Hi xFirebird925x, I like and agree with your comment here. "这个时代连团结都不会，还能干什么呢？从来就没看见过老美上别的国家网站上跟自己人对骂的，学学人家吧". Don't just quarrel with each other. Stand up, plan and do real good things. That is the top priority now.
@Acedscy Accuracy is highly debatable in a history book. For example, William of Tyre was the official historian of the Kingdom of Jerusalem during the 12th century. However, his book is touted as being biased towards a certain faction. As a historian, one must use one's mind to analyze information and decide whether it's correct or not. You might agree with a certain historian, but that doesn't make your opinion any more valid than someone else who disagrees with that historian.
@Acedscy (cont) There was very little change in the three and a half centuries that the Ming ruled, whereas the Islamic world and Europe blossomed, and the latter in particular. That's because the Europeans did not shut off the outside world. They sought to explore it and learn about it. The Chinese didn't learn from their neighbours. That, in part might have been because their neighbours were too busy with surviving in harsh climates to develop high culture.
@Acedscy (cont) If you compare the philosophy and technology of the Manchus right after they conquered China, you will find they adopted Ming philosophy and culture. They were not a highly cultured people with a lot of philosphies of their own. When you look at the later Qing, you will find the Manchurians adopted the habits and language of the earlier Ming aristocrats and forgot their own warrior culture (which might have saved China if they hadn't lost it).
@ Acedscy The Mongols adopted Islam/buddhism/the culture of wherever they conquered. The Manchurians did the same in China. That's why some Mongols ended up as Christians and others as Muslims and still others as buddhists. And that's also why the Manchurians ended up with Confucian philosophy.
@Acedscy Both the European nations and the Ottoman Turks were much further behind the Chinese in the 14th century, which is when the Ming began. By the end of the Ming, China still had the same political systems, more or less the same technology, and the same philosophies. By contrast, England had established a new political system, new weapons had been developed all over the continent and a plethora of new philosophies had blossomed.
@papertiger7 The way I see it, they continued on a bad path set down by the Ming. That's not to say they didn't make their own mistakes, especially the Empress Tsi Xi (spelling?) but the Ming is the main culprit because they established the cultural stagnation which made China fall behind the rest of the world.
@TelcontarRulz Those 2 aren't normal books, those are official history books that tells the history of Ming Dynasty. Just that 明史 is less accurate while 明史稿 is the other way round.
@papertiger7 (cont'd) The Manchurians didn't know any better because the Han culture was the most dominant in the region, and they believed they had to be like the Ming, so they took up that culture when they conquered China. They just get blamed for China's downfall because they're not Han, but in reality, the stage for downfall was set when the country started stagnating in the Ming.
@papertiger7 No, I mean Ming. They took over China in the 14th century and cut off all ties with the outside world because they thought they were so brilliant, stopping trade with Central Asia and the Middle East, causing China to stagnate whilst in the west, Europe was having a blooming rennaissance. It was during the Ming when footbinding was introduced, and there was a new interpretation of Confucian values which made people very obedient, thus stalling development.
@Acedscy I have not read either of those books. I base my understanding and opinion on empirical facts, not on what one historian says. The Ming shut off contact with the outside world. This is a fact. If you compare the technology and philosophy that existed at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty to those that existed at the end of the Ming, you will find not very much has changed while the rest of the world has moved on, leaving China behind.
@Acedscy The lack of change is why I say the Ming caused China to stagnate and sowed the seeds for its defeat. You are free to disagree, of course, but I still don't think it's right to blame the Manchurians for all the woe China has suffered. And, to be quite honest, for me, the recent Confucian revival is a symptom that modern China is still making the same mistakes the Ming made.
@TelcontarRulz Ming Dynasty didn't shut off themselves to the world, if that is the case, what is Zheng He 7 voyages to the western sea is all about? Even after official seafaring has been terminated after Zheng He, private and commercial seafaring still continue. If you want to talk about technology please read through 武備志 and 天工開物 first. Philosophy wise, go read about those books written by 王守仁 first. His Confucius philosophy until now still has an influence in Japan and Korea.
@Acedscy (cont) China's geography didn't do it any favours. In the north and north west, it was separated from Russia and Central Asia by desert. In the west and southwest it was separated from India by the Himalayas. However, the Ming was the period where the Silk Road pretty much ceased because one emperor decided China was too good for the rest of the world. Therefore, it could not benefit from the the Renaissance in Europe or the Golden Age of the Ottoman Empire.
@Acedscy Massacres are common in the past. Everyone did it. I don't approve of it but it doesn't make the Manchus or the Mongols any worse than anyone else of their era. Have you ever heard of the Massacre of Jerusalem? Or perhaps the great number of Chinese killed by other Chinese in various ways? The thing is the Manchus and the Mongols adopted the culture of the conquered. The fact that they massacred those people had little to do with it.
@TelcontarRulz It seems you read too much Qing version of Ming Dynasty history. Go read 明史稿 instead of 明史 . Historian acknowledged 明史稿 as the most accurate in reflecting Ming Dynasty history. 明史 produced by the Manchu Qing court has been edited to many times and its accuracy is highly doubted but it will be a good book to compare with 明史稿
it's regretful that few individuals are trying to seek stupid independence in southwestern and southeastern, I am so confused what benefits can you get!Is there anything wrong about a unified China!!! 哎,要等到哪年啊, tears...
Why do so many people fight on youtube! It really isn't a place to talk about politics and to also to speak derogatorily about each other. It's so futile and stupid. Lets just enjoy the music and keep our unpleasant opinions civil or to ourselves. Peace.
韩磊真是难得的帝王之声！大气磅礴的浑厚感！太棒了！
难得一个蒙古族这么歌颂汉族 哈哈
假蒙古族而已，内蒙古四百万蒙古族至少一般都是假的，为了混政策而已
父亲是汉族
一群小人挑拨是非
没有足够的教养和深度的内涵是发不出这样大气磅礴的歌声的，不愧为歌坛一帝王！
韓磊唱歌真好聽!!很適合唱歷史劇!非常棒!! 氣勢磅礡!!!
這個歌手是蒙古族 這麼 歌頌 漢族 真是丟蒙古人臉
@@妙瓦底终结者-无精 不要破坏民族团结，匈奴不等于蒙古。
@rundstedt7305 尔小人之心
@@妙瓦底终结者-无精 煞笔日本杂种，懂大中华吗？金日磾、哥舒翰、高仙芝...，为中华传承做出贡献的非汉族人多了去了，就你个劣等倭奴，想加入中华大家庭都没门，恶心。
@@妙瓦底终结者-无精 匈奴人又不是蒙古人，不是汉人赶跑了匈奴人，后来就没有什么蒙古人了
Great Song ... Love from Pakistan
因為這首歌..我又再看了1次漢武大帝...
真好听！声音浑厚！
特別喜歡這類歌,鼓舞人心,從小立志躍馬中原,如今已近半百,期待有生之年,再創大漢盛世.
会的 一定会的每个华夏儿女奋斗的目标
现在我们头顶上仅剩下一个美国了。
根本童年啊。
Seriously, awesome music and a very majestic voice. Nice!
我为我是汉人感到骄傲！犯我强汉者虽远必诛！但同样，汉朝也并非是一个闭塞的王朝，她和盛唐一样，都是海纳百川，这才是一个伟大帝国的根本！
好听，又气势，有内涵。喜欢！！
华夏民族和汉民族一直讲究的都是文化的认同，而并不一定要求是纯正的血缘关系。只要是认同汉民族的衣冠礼仪与为人道德，都可以称得上是汉族的继承人 :)
没有足够的教养和深度的内涵是发不出这样大气磅礴的歌声的，不愧为歌坛一帝王！
好有力量的一首歌!
汉军威武，汉军威武，汉军威武！
就是一首歌而已，没必要太上纲上线。这首看起来充满了大汉族主义的歌曲，词作者蒙古族，曲作者朝鲜族，演唱者 韩磊也是蒙古族。是英雄各民族都喜欢
我擦，太牛逼了，你俩真是能说啊，还从头到尾不带翻脸的，佩服！
Beautiful song.
大爱此歌！电视剧也不错，勾起很多回忆。。。
底下的都不要吵了好不好，烦死了。什么蒙古人汉人的，现在都是中国人。这个时代连团结都不会，还能干什么呢？从来就没看见过老美上别的国家网站上跟自己人对骂的，学学人家吧。
Hi xFirebird925x,
I like and agree with your comment here. "这个时代连团结都不会，还能干什么呢？从来就没看见过老美上别的国家网站上跟自己人对骂的，学学人家吧".
Don't just quarrel with each other. Stand up, plan and do real good things. That is the top priority now.
外国人不用嘴，直接枪干
陈瞻 你错了，老外喜欢搞Propaganda（宣传），来拉拢人心。中国人就是不会这个。老外真正比中国人好的是宣传，而不是什么武器军队。
xFirebird925x 中国人不会propaganda？ 开什么玩笑。不过只是现在似乎中国甘当依附（政治上）。想当年太祖在世多威风。美国人权运动，太祖说我支持；小兄弟被揍了直接送军火甚至派军，虚个锤子；弄得后来日本有毛派，印度有毛派，以至于至今美国一些人抗议时还举个毛主席像。这都不单是舆论宣传搞得好，同时中国能言行一致，说什么就是什么。而现在，呵呵呵。 中国当然不能走争霸的路线；但是我们在政治意识形态上必须独立。ps。 陈瞻的说法其实也有道理的；美国的作风其实很像笑傲江湖里的左冷禅：说你是勾结魔教便弄死你；武力是他们宣传的后盾，宣传有时不过是内裤罢了，其实穿不穿都无所谓。
FOX LIGHTMAN 对，“甘当依附”，于是就让别人抢先占领了道德高地，这种落后不是一年两年就能逆转的。
好有霸气的歌声，喜欢韩磊的歌
韩磊、葛根塔娜与张宏光，被业界广泛认可的“乐坛铁三角”。知名导演胡玫，李少红，张黎，张新建，毛卫宁御用歌者及词曲作者。
提昇正能量的歌曲
这首歌的作者葛根塔娜是蒙古族。我爱汉族，因为我是汉族。我爱中国的各个民族，因为我是中国人。历史上没有一个文明能通过民族压迫来稳定的。
民族国家这玩意这是欧洲带来的, 中国自古以来就没有这概念, 你认同中华文明, 大家都是一家人, 你不认同, 就算你黑头发黄皮肤, 你也不是一家人
大巧不工。好聽。
氣勢磅礡
这才是我大汉民族的气势
漢人崇拜漢朝無可厚非！本就應該如此，漢人不是搞民族主義，而是提高民族共識！
+苏徽 说得好
+苏徽 你见过官方的言论或行为里什么时候倾向汉族，或提过汉族？一律都是中华民族的好吗？
56个民族，55个少数民族的学生高考时都加分，都享受两少一宽政策。相比汉族才是二等民族吧！我倒是希望我的身份证上是少数民族！
+苏徽 你完全搞不清中共的民族政策--56的民族同属中华民族，汉族在大陆没有任何被强调的动作，我们也不能说含有太强汉民族主义的话，一切都是中华民族这个前提。少数民族受到各方面优待，在很多非边境地区，不少维吾尔族搞盗窃，藏族卖假药，地方政府都不敢管，因为牵涉民族团结，这个问题会上纲上线。
--以上
不知道的還以為你腦子進水啥的。呵呵，笑死我了。
少數不少數本不是問題!大家和睦相處!問題出在少數受到帝國主義思想煽動!中國大多的少數民族是本份過日子!
国恒以弱丧，独汉以强亡。惜哉？壮哉！
我觉得汉亡完全是因为太过刚强了，道家刚柔并济还是很有道理的
明明是主幼，外戚干政，太监乱政的必然结果！
Long live China
让一缕缕火焰翩翩起舞
大福将至
好样的!我顶!
河洛之水，炎黄之胃，耽耽枕戈而眠。打败了农耕民族蚩尤，为汉人争了一片繁衍生息的沃土，黄帝后代又有向北迁徙至极北苦寒之地，肃真，鲜卑诸民族的祖先。真是伟大的人啊！
Cheers! ... For China, and for being Chinese!
巍巍大汉！战无不胜，攻无不克！宜悬头槁街蛮夷邸间，以示万里。明犯强汉者，虽远必诛！
光我神州, 耀我中華~
听个歌，看了半天的评论。。。
大魔王
寇可往，吾亦可往
@Acedscy Accuracy is highly debatable in a history book. For example, William of Tyre was the official historian of the Kingdom of Jerusalem during the 12th century. However, his book is touted as being biased towards a certain faction. As a historian, one must use one's mind to analyze information and decide whether it's correct or not. You might agree with a certain historian, but that doesn't make your opinion any more valid than someone else who disagrees with that historian.
汉武大帝和朱元璋两部电视剧看的时候就是
这首歌的曲调有很浓厚的蒙古特色。
并没有
你的“历史知识”明显来源自网络，相当的具有小说色彩。
我可独立研究匈奴很多年了，看到你这样发言的还真不少。
可想而知，学术跟平民意识还是很大的区别的。
漢軍威武
大漢威武
民者,公也.
君者,私也.
為上者,謀私.習以為常.民亂之源也.
故天下為公,執政為民;則治之大道.
治民以法,上下一從.則雖千絲万縷而不亂也.
不管執政者誰人;有法可依,則如火車之行於軌.雖有不同駕者,路則同也.
法之不存,冇所依托.是故結党,拉幫以自保.
亂之源.
@Acedscy (cont) There was very little change in the three and a half centuries that the Ming ruled, whereas the Islamic world and Europe blossomed, and the latter in particular. That's because the Europeans did not shut off the outside world. They sought to explore it and learn about it. The Chinese didn't learn from their neighbours. That, in part might have been because their neighbours were too busy with surviving in harsh climates to develop high culture.
1 [0:46/0:54/1:02/1:10]
2 [1:19/1:27/1:33/1:42/1:49/1:57]
@Acedscy (cont) If you compare the philosophy and technology of the Manchus right after they conquered China, you will find they adopted Ming philosophy and culture. They were not a highly cultured people with a lot of philosphies of their own. When you look at the later Qing, you will find the Manchurians adopted the habits and language of the earlier Ming aristocrats and forgot their own warrior culture (which might have saved China if they hadn't lost it).
@ Acedscy The Mongols adopted Islam/buddhism/the culture of wherever they conquered. The Manchurians did the same in China. That's why some Mongols ended up as Christians and others as Muslims and still others as buddhists. And that's also why the Manchurians ended up with Confucian philosophy.
@Acedscy Both the European nations and the Ottoman Turks were much further behind the Chinese in the 14th century, which is when the Ming began. By the end of the Ming, China still had the same political systems, more or less the same technology, and the same philosophies. By contrast, England had established a new political system, new weapons had been developed all over the continent and a plethora of new philosophies had blossomed.
韩磊唱歌就是给爷们儿听得
1】东归路
2】好男儿
3】碧血剑
4】秦始皇
5】向天再借五百年
6】浩浩乾坤
7】千百年后谁又记得谁
8】心灵睡过的地方
9】等待
10】最后的倾诉
。。。
是男人的，顶！
蒙古长调的汉族歌曲
@papertiger7 The way I see it, they continued on a bad path set down by the Ming. That's not to say they didn't make their own mistakes, especially the Empress Tsi Xi (spelling?) but the Ming is the main culprit because they established the cultural stagnation which made China fall behind the rest of the world.
大漢民族！萬歲萬歲，萬萬歲！
兩千多年過去了，1949幸好出了（十大元帥 ---- 十大內戰英雄，抗戰狗熊）中華民族真幸運！難怪他們年老時都不得好死......哈哈哈！
@TelcontarRulz Those 2 aren't normal books, those are official history books that tells the history of Ming Dynasty. Just that 明史 is less accurate while 明史稿 is the other way round.
@papertiger7 (cont'd) The Manchurians didn't know any better because the Han culture was the most dominant in the region, and they believed they had to be like the Ming, so they took up that culture when they conquered China. They just get blamed for China's downfall because they're not Han, but in reality, the stage for downfall was set when the country started stagnating in the Ming.
@papertiger7 No, I mean Ming. They took over China in the 14th century and cut off all ties with the outside world because they thought they were so brilliant, stopping trade with Central Asia and the Middle East, causing China to stagnate whilst in the west, Europe was having a blooming rennaissance. It was during the Ming when footbinding was introduced, and there was a new interpretation of Confucian values which made people very obedient, thus stalling development.
@Acedscy I have not read either of those books. I base my understanding and opinion on empirical facts, not on what one historian says. The Ming shut off contact with the outside world. This is a fact. If you compare the technology and philosophy that existed at the beginning of the Ming Dynasty to those that existed at the end of the Ming, you will find not very much has changed while the rest of the world has moved on, leaving China behind.
fucking awesome！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！！my blood pressure is going up！！
@Acedscy The lack of change is why I say the Ming caused China to stagnate and sowed the seeds for its defeat. You are free to disagree, of course, but I still don't think it's right to blame the Manchurians for all the woe China has suffered.
And, to be quite honest, for me, the recent Confucian revival is a symptom that modern China is still making the same mistakes the Ming made.
横眉冷对千夫指，俯首甘为孺子牛！
@TelcontarRulz Ming Dynasty didn't shut off themselves to the world, if that is the case, what is Zheng He 7 voyages to the western sea is all about? Even after official seafaring has been terminated after Zheng He, private and commercial seafaring still continue.
If you want to talk about technology please read through 武備志 and 天工開物 first. Philosophy wise, go read about those books written by 王守仁 first. His Confucius philosophy until now still has an influence in Japan and Korea.
振奮神經 絕對耐聽
汉文化还是中国文化之正统
@Acedscy (cont) China's geography didn't do it any favours. In the north and north west, it was separated from Russia and Central Asia by desert. In the west and southwest it was separated from India by the Himalayas. However, the Ming was the period where the Silk Road pretty much ceased because one emperor decided China was too good for the rest of the world. Therefore, it could not benefit from the the Renaissance in Europe or the Golden Age of the Ottoman Empire.
@TelcontarRulz You mean the Qing right? Please elaborate.
谈笑渴饮匈奴血 壮志饥餐胡虏肉
Lei Deng 壮志饥餐民工肉 谈笑渴饮百姓血
@@alikalik4032 这哪跟那啊，胡扯瞎扯，你是愤青嘛？
@@宁静致远-o5f 去学历史。
@@alikalik4032 愤青。
@@宁静致远-o5f 无力讲理，直接扣帽子，就是你这类人的特色。
汉武雄魂 长存
有高音质的吗？这个音质不太好。
看到下面蒙古族和汉族辩论感觉悲哀。汉代和匈奴战争是历史也是事实，个人感觉这部电视剧表现更多的是汉朝（影射中国）对抗匈奴（影射西方），以及宫廷中的政治斗争，顺便溜须了一下当朝政治人物。拍电视剧你总不能要求他架空历史吧。汉朝打败匈奴就是历史。大陆还拍过成吉思汗的电视剧呢。大家都是中国人，就不要自己内斗了吧？中国行，大家才行。出国了，人们很少关注到你的民族，更多是你的国家。
杨阳 没办法，民族主义是经济发展人民生活水平提高的必然结果，随着人们物质条件不断改善，普通民众尤其是平民知识分子们寻根倾向越来越严重，什么汉服运动，《明朝那些事儿》走红都是对其具体反应和表现。还有就是中国西藏，新疆地区常年不稳这一现实原因也有一定推波助澜的作用。最根本的原因还是自苏东剧变其意识形态全球瓦解后中国当局为维护统治，转移人民视线纵容默许中国民族主义蓬勃发展已作为“新”意识形态，结果没想到引申出如此问题。
兄弟見笑.我讀史,也是軍迷.
我國有99式,也有wz-10.但祗會裝備數大部隊,不會是全面的.尤其是wz-10,尚未批產.
中國大建軍日子不遠,卻非今天.
汝等年輕有材之士,他日必將大用.
鐵騎民族這稱號,留給你們吧.
不過,別忘記"民治"在前為要.
@so0o0n 你写了几十版了,说得好
寇可往，吾亦可往。
先把汉服普及一下吧，重温祖先文明，传承香火，汉服真的很美
@Acedscy Massacres are common in the past. Everyone did it. I don't approve of it but it doesn't make the Manchus or the Mongols any worse than anyone else of their era. Have you ever heard of the Massacre of Jerusalem? Or perhaps the great number of Chinese killed by other Chinese in various ways? The thing is the Manchus and the Mongols adopted the culture of the conquered. The fact that they massacred those people had little to do with it.
@so0o0n well said!
评论永远比视频精彩！
這首可以重新上傳嗎? 太小聲了, 有點可惜
@TelcontarRulz So..what about the Qing?
匈奴属于阿尔泰山系和突厥属于一系，发源于阿尔泰山附近，战斗力比较弱，跟中原王朝争斗一般处于下风，蒙古属于东胡，和鲜卑属于一系，发源地约在呼伦贝尔草原，额尔古纳河一代，契丹也有部分发源于此。战斗力明显比突厥系的强悍.现代学者通过考古发现匈奴属于黄种人跟蒙古人是差不多的，但有一部分属于白种，其实是暗白种人，这主要是因为匈奴攻灭了大月氏，大月氏逃到中亚至阿富汗附近，匈奴抢掠了大量的大月氏妇女，并强娶了她们，大月氏是白种人，混血后属于显性基因，这部分人约占匈奴的六分之一，属于图兰人种，芬兰跟汉族接近这事不靠谱，不过有证据说明，有一部分芬兰人的祖先是黄种人，还有匈牙利人，或许有马扎尔人血统，但这些人现在已经几乎都欧化了，与我们相差很远
保家卫国，是每个人的本分，开疆扩土，乃是帝王之奢欲。
不战而屈人之兵，上之上策也。为黎民苍生，请随孙武，模仿帝胄。
哈哈。喜欢享乐的帝王才不愿意干开疆拓土得苦差事呢。
有点奇怪啊：为什么这么多以中文（国语）为母语的人用英文在讨论呢。中文（国语）不是更好么？简体繁体当然没有关系，但为何会用英文呢？
其实汉民族文化复兴很好，但是大汉民族主义大家还是忘却吧。现在不是几百年前了已经，想起初中年少轻狂的时候还很气愤：为什么岳飞不是民族英雄（至少鲁教版教科书是这样的），我反驳老师：那假如几百年后中日合并张灵甫孙立人将军也都不是民族英雄了？若干年后才明白我们要活在当下。
额，不知汉武大帝的MV为何讨论多尔衮呢？
泰国有免费医疗那伙计更加搞笑，不知世界第一强国美国有免费医疗么？国土面积越大，人越多，历史背景越复杂，那么国家就越难以管理，会出现很多问题，这一点大家赞同吧。
总而言之，无论是哪一个民族，无论是台湾还是中国大陆还是港澳新加坡，我们留着华夏人的血，就少些内斗。有这骂战的功夫不如做点正事，例如做点研究什么的。
不知台湾港澳如何想的，个人和大陆多数人都认为在今天的西方主流世界，华夏人依然有很长的路要走。突然有点明白当年日本人为什么会用：大东亚共荣圈这个我之前不理解的口号了。 西方人的主流就是扼杀黄种人，无论是中国强，台湾强，日本强，还是韩国强。哪一个的崛起绝对会被美欧为首的西方所压制。这里面很多历史达人，而历史和政治也是不分家的。大家肯定都明白当年罗斯福与杜鲁门在中日韩三国之间以争议岛屿组成的战略部署。
无论是中国大陆，台湾，香港，澳门，还是新加坡（不知道新加坡人还认为是炎黄子孙么，听在新加坡留学的朋友说新加坡年轻人很少有会说汉语的了），希望诸位华夏之后团结奋斗。
最后喊一句中共很喜欢但真的很有道理的口号：中华民族的伟大复兴之路！
我从小到大没听说过岳飞不是民族英雄
外国人, 别造谣了
受不了这歌功颂德的歌词，什么你点燃了自己照亮了大地，敢情是教师节啊？
但音乐，节奏和画面实在太棒了，韩磊唱得也棒~~~
可惜啊，那是过去啦。好汉不提当年勇。反正共产党在就不可能有这样的日子
CCTV3
哪里有什么基因测序？哪本科学期刊发表过？有“民族基因”这种概念么？
翻翻网络文章就以为自己懂？
"汉字"是你发明的么？凭什么你要用？
民治不是民主;別驚.
民主也不會動亂,別怕.
中國憲法也列明有民主的嘛.
我國共產党也講党內民主的嘛.
美國立國沒有照搬英式民主.
我們偉大的祖國也可以有自己的政治形式嘛.你要俾人民幸褔.對嘛?
你會覺得自已個仔笨嗎?
還是你想他愚呢?
愛民如子嘛.你在乎他聰明或愚笨.
你就是要愛他,為他多想想,這才對嘛.
孔,孟我服他這半句話."民為責,君為輕."
一群民眾也不是愚笨的,是散沙而矣.有出頭鳥的.不過出頭烏的机因經過一代一代的愚民與極杈.都差不多死光了.
衹有飛翔的鳥,才見到天馬行空.
豬兄,我亦言盡於此. 后會有期
有沒有更清楚的版本？
@TelcontarRulz It seems you read too much Qing version of Ming Dynasty history. Go read 明史稿 instead of 明史 . Historian acknowledged 明史稿 as the most accurate in reflecting Ming Dynasty history. 明史 produced by the Manchu Qing court has been edited to many times and its accuracy is highly doubted but it will be a good book to compare with 明史稿
代价是什么?得到又是什么?
死的是誰?享受成果又是誰?
历史上汉族强则中国强，中国强则亚洲强。
Wo zuihode qingsu,shi:wei wo weiide jiezi bao chou!semir/Hong Bao/Krasznij Barsz/
it's regretful that few individuals are trying to seek stupid independence in southwestern and southeastern, I am so confused what benefits can you get!Is there anything wrong about a unified China!!! 哎,要等到哪年啊, tears...
要吵架/罵人的都不要進來
這是藉口
one world, one china~
一個世界, 一個中國~
是吗？据我所知匈奴有一部分蒙古血统，这样认为的科学家还挺多的，但我对这门学问没研究。
Why do so many people fight on youtube! It really isn't a place to talk about politics and to also to speak derogatorily about each other. It's so futile and stupid. Lets just enjoy the music and keep our unpleasant opinions civil or to ourselves. Peace.