How big can you build? Revisiting a Kerbal Classic
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 сер 2024
- ▶ Patreon - / shadowzone
▶ UA-cam membership - / @shadowzone
🠴Join me to stay in the loop for more KSP stuff and general madness, Kerbal, space or otherwise!🠶
▶ Discord - / discord
▶ Mastodon - mastodon.social/@ShadowZone
▶ Twitter - / the_shadowzone
0:00 Revisiting a classic
2:11 Launching the Beast
6:53 Finally in Space
8:27 Escape Pods!
#ksp2 #kerbalspaceprogram2 #spaceship
🠴Interested in the vehicles I make in Kerbal Space Program? Check out my KerbalX🠶
▶ kerbalx.com/The_ShadowZone/
▶ steamcommunity.com/id/the_sha...
🠴Music🠶
"Invictus Outro" (c) The ShadowZone
Get my Music here:
▶ Spotify:
open.spotify.com/artist/0F8ZM...
▶ Apple Music:
itunes.apple.com/ca/artist/sh...
▶ Google Play:
play.google.com/store/music/a...
▶ Deezer:
www.deezer.com/de/artist/5298...
▶ Tidal:
tidal.com/browse/artist/10500010
"Failing Defense", "District Four", "The Show Must Be Go" and "Hypnothis" all (c) Kevin MacLeod ( incompetech.com/music )
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...
🠴HELLO everybody and welcome to the ShadowZone🠶
Here you can find weird and funny videos about Kerbal Space Program and other video games. In general, if you like space, space ships, space stations or any space related video game, this channel is the right place to be!
I try to deliver you fascinating creations, tutorial and how-to videos about KSP and other video game content.
I also compose my own music from time to time.
Stay a while and join the shadowzone community by subscribing to my channel or following me on those social thingies up there. - Ігри
Oh here we go with the classic Shadowzone epic crafts, AGAIN!!!!
The fix for wobble works great for rockets, but its still not enough for large, complex builds. You either have to waste half the partcount on strutting the thing to high heavens, or watch as it starts performing exotic danses before unceremoniously blowing up
Anyway, amazing build!
Yeah, I had a really hard time with this. Not so much because of wobble but because of insufferable lag. I had like 2-3 seconds per frame. All launch footage is sped up 8x. It's insane.
RO is an entirely different game. Challenging. Might be an option for additional channel Contant. Unfortunately, you can’t really do the giant awesome cruisers very easily.
i have noticed with procedural parts in the mods, you can make bigger crafts with much lower part counts and much more rigid bodies, so the fps stays a fair bit higher overall in RO/RP-1 than it does in "vanilla" modded ksp
@@williambrown3699 That’s true. It’s just much harder to get craft into orbit in realism overhaul and huge ships have very low mass to weight ratio and that can be painful.
It's been years since I put any time into KSP, but RO/RP-1 is the only way I can play.
I have to agree. Shadowzone should consider either RP1 or heavily modded ksp1. Try the USI with WOLF logistics.
Either way, I’ll be watching!
What is ro or rp1?
I guess, you need to make megamaid.
I love the airbrake doors; very cool!
I'd love to see someone try some of the better-looking planet packs in KSP1. I remember a screenshot of KSC on a beautiful habitable moon in orbit of a big blue ringed gas giant. I think there could be plenty of content in missions and even grand tours in various planet packs. There seems to be quite a lot of good-looking planet packs around these days, perhaps infinitely many if you include the procedurally-generated systems of Infinite Discoveries by Sushut.
9:59 Just like the Titanic, not all the escape pods got away! XD
At least the accident while testing the escape pods can give some consistent lore, some disaster happened (nuclear meltdown?) which caused the crew to evacuate via the escape pods, then the disaster blew up the ship as they were evacuating
Aeroshield? Nah. How about a giant air scoop in front of the rocket. Fun for the whole Space Centre! 😅
0:44 No way... I'll go watch some of your older videos then...
Beautiful interior...
I never understand how you can torture yourself like that. LMAO
Not gonna lie, I am beginning to question why I am willing to endure all of this.
@@ShadowZone if they had used UE4/5 it would easily support a ship like this. UE4.20 (I think possibily later) eliminated physx while supporting hardware physics. It made it possible to have 100k interactions without dropping framerates.
Always good to see shadowzone post
With that giant opening at the front I thought it was the Cant at first
I thought more of the Cortez from Babylon 5 when I built it.
But yeah, remember the Cant!
reminds me of macey dean
Make an rocket that pulls the cruiser up. That's how I got my 747 to duna
If we got some kind of interior decorating/modelling system in KSP 2 that would have been awesome. I guess it would be like some kind of IVA construction?
I wish there was some way to allow for 1000+ semi-rigid body space ships so players could push their creativity and ambitions, but also keep some of the fun and challenging soft body physics. I think KSP 2 settled for some kind of dynamic welding scheme where similar parts are treated as a single rigid body, but it is still somehow slower than KSP 1. Maybe for some reason the physics colliders on the parts are more detailed and therefore more expensive to simulate, idk?
Was really looking forward to some kind of IVA construction mode where you could decorate/build the interiors of spaceships and colonies. Would have also allowed for optimisations like separating the interior/exterior physics simulation into separate scenes so you could have arbitarily complex interiors without adding load to the external physics engine. It's hard to do detailing especially for interiors when the game begins to crawl at the 300+ part count mark.
I think you need an anchor to weigh the bottom down so it stays right side up.
I know, right? :) But the trouble with aerodynamics is it wants to put the heavy end first with the light but aerodynamically draggy end at the back. It's really bad when all your heavy engines are in the back, where they should be for spaceflight.
this is sick. i dont know how people build things like this. i can barely build an orbital class rocket💀
My laptop: 💻🔥💥
5:42 2 fps?? No no no here at KSP&Co we've the 2 spf 🤣
Very entertaining.
This size of craft, wait till the navball prograde shifts before going from straight up. And top it off, wait till 70,001 km before starting the orbital roll attempt. All the surface area from the forward bay will be effected by the slightest of atmosphere. As for the explosions when attempting the escape pods, is most likely due to pieces bounding boxes overlapping, even slightly. Also, engine plates the lower node is solid. Using them on the bottom of the rocket, with a strong engine under it, will keep it from actually lifting off the launch pad.
On the question of insufferable lag.. I just put my persoanl Duna Mission on hold because I could not power through flying at 5fps doing the crafts I wanted for any longer.. but I have put 1200 hours into KSP2 now.. and We'll see if I get back. Also.. we will see if there will be a last update before the door is locked and the lights are turned off
check out space engineers with mods. i belice there are aerodynamics mods, orbital etc at least it dosent LAG :-)
I have a KSP 2 0.2.1 and I want to open one of my campaigns but I don't see its flag, last time played and so on. How am I supposed to fix this?
Is this the ship that supposed to be on the cover for the channel?
It's amazing, I really wanted to be able to see and navigate inside the station. You can customize the interior of the station. But this is not implemented in the defunct KSP2.
Here to boost the algorithm!
big man:tm:
spaceship
March 2025, close Forum, Kerbal-X and SpaceDock. The business set up between streaming and IG is over. They were lucky, it lasted longer than they should. Now I want to see how they take care of the debts.
A return to form for mr zone
#AGAIN happening AGAIN
Do more ksp1 content
Simple constructions and global construction help with this! All you need is a routine mission manager.
What does global construction do?
@@eekee6034 You can build and supply ships to give little ships etc.
AGAIN!
Can we get a craft file? This is sick!
Your video covering the development of KSP2 was nothing short of excellent. I can't believe that Take 2 would stoop so low to tie the hands of the KSP 2 developers and abandon the game. I hope they sell off license to a developer who is passionate about KSP and cares about what this game means. Great videos shadow zone, and; AGAIN!!!!!!
should have used mods to tp it.
Thanks for keep doing things in KSP2, some of us still like it... unfortunatelly this experiment just prooved how unstable 2 is... 😅
But why would you still like it? It's a broken, unfinished game. No one is modding it any more. I switched back to KSP1 a couple weeks ago.
@@-Gorby- because it is a challenge, it has no IRSU, that made me feel like cheating when landing and coming back to orbit to every celestial body in KSP1, and no Mech Jeb. And because graphics are stunning and because it does not take 5 minutes to load.
@@juanignacioayalarico9410 I mean... you could just not use those things in KSP1. I've never done IRSU and it's real easy to not install Mechjeb - the same way you don't install the KSP2 equivalent, called Flight Plan. EVE and Parallax take care of the graphics. Seems weird to instead keep playing a game you yourself admit is unstable.
@@-Gorby- because I have installed all those, and honestly... KSP1 looks awfull. Bad animations, ugly spacesuits, the kerbals hair is a joke... dunno, maybe putting 3,000 hours into something is enough to say "hey, let's try a different approach". Does KSP1 have driven story like "For science!" does?
So your "different approach" is to play a less complete and less stable version of the exact same game? LOL what? All so you can have subjectively "better" graphics at 20fps? I've played both, with graphics mods KSP1 looks just as good - if not better - and I still get a solid 60fps everywhere. And yes, KSP1 does have a driven story, it's called "Career Mode". I'm starting to think you haven't played KSP1 in the last 4-5 years and don't know the current state of it.
The audacity to ask me to subscribe when you produce videos that don't address the title of the video... This is not quality content
Dude, why bother with KSP2 still? Just go back to KSP1 like everyone else - don't worry I'll still watch your vids
I’m making things up huh lol you’re just as sad as the rest of them.
@@IamJoeTV Yeah - I said he should play KSP1, which still "supports the company". You may not know this but Take Two owns both games.
I’m not even gonna watch this KSP2 crap, unless Take 2 sells the IP and the game starts improving again that piece of 💩 disappointment of the decade doesn’t exist.
Also, since they own the IP of Ksp 1 there’s little chance they’ll let the game be updated and improved. We shouldn’t be sad, we should be angry and demand triple A companies stop ruining games and destroying developers lives and communities in mass!!!
How? As long as the financial incentives behind doing this exist it will keep happening.
@@Pyxis10boycott in mass.
@@hitekkaifighter1825 Would work sure, besides maybe once with dnd I've never seen it actually happen sucessfully.
Uhhhh playing KSP2 just promotes the crappy company behind it.
Here come the Soy Boy replies!!
that company owns ksp 1. there is no way around it
Bruh KSP2 Bad we get it. Chill. Let the man play what he likes
@@applesaregoodeatings They bought the IP after Squad made the game. Big difference.
@@applesaregoodeatings Also we all know and loved Squad for what they did, not Take Two and what they have done.
@@avalanchas336 Just like your comment i can write one as well. You do realize any comment benefits his page.