The Ghostbusters Novel is Unbelievable

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 січ 2023
  • The original novelization of Ghostbusters had a lot of weird and interesting extra bits with also deleted scenes and older script draft elements in it!
    My Site ► phelous.com
    Support on Patreon ► / phelous
    Twitter ► / phelous
    Instagram ► / phelanporteous
    Facebook ► / therealphelous
  • Комедії

КОМЕНТАРІ • 319

  • @Predator20357
    @Predator20357 Рік тому +169

    So we got extra horniness, character growth, Egon and his Snacking addiction, curse words being removed and added, original rough cut scenes being added, Peter being an extra jerk, people are extra angry when they get mad. Sounds like a good time for a Book based on a movie.

    • @BouchIsOnTheLoose702
      @BouchIsOnTheLoose702 Рік тому +1

      I collect Ghostbusters merchandise and I have a lot of stuff. I even have an empty can of Heinz Pasta of The Real Ghostbusters from the 1990s. I'm going to wait a little while until I sell it. I've had it for 30 years and it's in great shape. In 2019, I had an offer of $250.00 however, I turned it down.

  • @iKadaj
    @iKadaj Рік тому +56

    also i love the other girls being all "get out! out! i'll scream!" all flustered and frustrated and then Ripley is just "get. out." and he shuffles off before she can get her flamethrower.

  • @TheSmart-CasualGamer
    @TheSmart-CasualGamer Рік тому +204

    I love the idea that Janine created the logo. It makes a lot of sense to me. Like she suggested it as a dismissive joke when Ray went to interview her for the job, but he took it as a serious suggestion. I can't imagine either Egon or Peter being that bothered about a logo at all.

    • @Shades14
      @Shades14 Рік тому +15

      If I thought they'd put in that much effort, I'd almost think that's why they had Chris Hemsworth's character pitching logos in Answer the Call, as a reference to the book.

    • @TommyDeonauthsArchives
      @TommyDeonauthsArchives Рік тому +5

      Glad to see that scrapped idea was used in Paul Feig's Feminist crap that guest starred close approximations to Ghostbusters...

    • @MrOwwl
      @MrOwwl Рік тому

      @@Shades14 THAT MOVIE IS FORBIDDEN IN THIS REALM!!! 🚫

    • @oxman5571
      @oxman5571 Рік тому +3

      @@TommyDeonauthsArchives cries a lot into his Underoos, which he hasn't changed since his mommy died.

    • @hdervish2497
      @hdervish2497 Рік тому +7

      @@TommyDeonauthsArchives hate it because it's bad, not because it's feminist.

  • @jdenoe69
    @jdenoe69 Рік тому +80

    Ah the Richard Mueller novel. It does give greater insight into the characters backgrounds and motivations. It's no wonder JMS hired him as a writer for The Real Ghostbusters.

  • @cheezemonkeyeater
    @cheezemonkeyeater Рік тому +27

    "Looked at. With your eyes!"
    This is somehow the first time I've ever heard this line. Boy, I wish that had made the final cut, it's such a good one.

    • @jamesoblivion
      @jamesoblivion Рік тому +3

      An early example of the comedic Christopher Walken impression.

    • @JohnDoe-wq5eu
      @JohnDoe-wq5eu Рік тому

      It really is all about Murray's delivery.
      It takes an okay line and absolutely makes it hilarious.

    • @mitchfletcher2386
      @mitchfletcher2386 10 місяців тому

      ​@@jamesoblivionIt sounded more like John Travolta.

  • @BugsyFoga
    @BugsyFoga Рік тому +10

    “READING MAKES ME FEEL GOOD”

  • @Jim-Mc
    @Jim-Mc Рік тому +9

    The first scene with Dana and Peter in her apartment definitely only works because she's so clearly not really threatened by him. Props to Sigourney Weaver.

  • @captainautobots
    @captainautobots Рік тому +61

    Wonder what the Q5 version of this story would be. Probably just a picture book of Slimer and the rest going on a picnic (prepared by Jeanine of course). Then Slimer eats all the food, and Peter proclaims "I love you, spud!" The last 3 pages are blank because the story was cancelled due to low interest.

  • @larrylaffer3246
    @larrylaffer3246 Рік тому +94

    It's nice when the novelization is a bit different than the film it's based on. Much like BTTF novel. They can write in some deleted scenes, ideas that were good but were either too hard to film/didn't work pace wise, and adding characters that had to be cut.

    • @theblocksays
      @theblocksays Рік тому +1

      Yeah I read the novelization to Albert Pyun's The Sword and the Sorcerer by Norman Winski, liked how he added some more lore to the setting but was also kinda funny how "horny on the main" some of the writing was.

    • @kendragon2012
      @kendragon2012 Рік тому +1

      I remember reading the novelization of E.T. The Extraterrestrial as a kid a few years before I got to see the actual movie on VHS. I was very confused at how much was missing from the movie. Especially not hearing ET have full blown conversations with his potted plant.

  • @jessie3268
    @jessie3268 Рік тому +18

    With the "modem" science. It was probably that the reprint was made by scanning the original into a computer and the OCR fucked up. This happens with a lot of reprints where they don't bother proofreading

    • @markiangooley
      @markiangooley Рік тому +3

      It’s not just novelizations. Some Kindle editions of books are scanned from a print edition, then not proofread at all. I got a Kindle version of the usual Penguin Books paperback edition of The City of God by St. Augustine. Thousands of copies of several of the same few scanning errors, plus a few each of dozens of others. They didn’t even have some unpaid intern flag the errors for correction, they just did nothing.

  • @yoshikfireball
    @yoshikfireball Рік тому +37

    ah yes, the series we've all come to know and love, phelous and the books

  • @WillKeaton
    @WillKeaton Рік тому +24

    Just when you thought Phelous had reviewed _Ghostbusters_ on every format known to man...

    • @ebwarg
      @ebwarg Рік тому +2

      There’s still the British novelization…uh, novelisation!

    • @47Jaspers
      @47Jaspers Рік тому +2

      @@ebwarg Ghostbustres

    • @gracekim25
      @gracekim25 Рік тому

      @@47Jaspers it’s spelt the same 😂

  • @nosprings82
    @nosprings82 Рік тому +6

    1:25 Joan Benji is the first person to actually "just get beyond Thunderdome."

  • @Martialartfruituser
    @Martialartfruituser Рік тому +37

    One thing that will always make me curious about reading a novelization or the comics of a movie that has a cartoon...Whose voices do you imagine saying these lines more? The movie cast or the cartoon cast.

    • @mitchfletcher2386
      @mitchfletcher2386 Рік тому +7

      I go for a mix of both.

    • @phelous
      @phelous  Рік тому +25

      Definitely went with the movie voices in my head for this one.

    • @TheSmart-CasualGamer
      @TheSmart-CasualGamer Рік тому +4

      The two have merged a bit in my head. Ray and Winston are total hybrids of their live action and animated selves.

  • @matthewjones6786
    @matthewjones6786 Рік тому +8

    I haven't even seen Ghost Busters yet, but I find myself still watching Phelous' videos just for little moments like him enunciating "Gooomph!"

  • @FNGLHR
    @FNGLHR Рік тому +37

    Man, novelizations are awesome. Even if they're not as good as the movie, you get to see some of the previous version of the film make it onto the page. Also, impressive note taking, that's a full on clipboard there. Overall, this review makes me wanna watch Ghostbusters again. Timeless classic of a film.

    • @CrisisComics
      @CrisisComics Рік тому +1

      The X2 novel is a great example of that, since it includes the ending where Jean Grey survives instead of being lost at Alkali Lake... and also has much more visceral descriptions of what Stryker's Anti-Cerebro does to mutants.

    • @Geospasmic
      @Geospasmic Рік тому +2

      I haven't read the Mortal Kombat novelization in a while but I remember it had Kano surviving and being arrested by Sonya Blade at the end.

  • @felipechalreo
    @felipechalreo Рік тому +7

    Egon wanted to take over the world.
    I shouted: "Of course!!!"
    If you know, you know.

  • @GleeChan
    @GleeChan Рік тому +73

    Off topic, but I love how Phelan makes fun of UA-cam thumbnails in his own thumbnails. He's still king of meta humor. See, it's that little extra detail that makes this channel great.

    • @andreasnickmann370
      @andreasnickmann370 Рік тому +6

      he's the self-proclaimed Tsar of reviews

    • @gracekim25
      @gracekim25 Рік тому +2

      Oh gosh I never caught that😂 good eye!

    • @Hijiri_MIRACHION
      @Hijiri_MIRACHION Рік тому

      @@andreasnickmann370 Man, that's a reference and a half!

    • @ToruKun1
      @ToruKun1 Рік тому +1

      BRUH I'm subscribed to you on DeviantArt! Never thought I'd see you here even if you've drawn Phelous/Good Times-centric fan art.

  • @PetaHatingChris42
    @PetaHatingChris42 Рік тому +4

    I'm wondering if the Baby Ruth references were meant to be a callback to the infamous scene in "Caddyshack", which starred Bill Murray and was co-written/directed by Harold Ramis. "It's no big deal!"

  • @UJEvans
    @UJEvans Рік тому +14

    I love unhinged movie novelizations.
    I once read a Creature from the Black Lagoon released 23 years after the movie. Where the Gill-Man was changed to a giant frog-dolphin and the doctors spend a whole chapter looking at his junk.

    • @JohnDoe-wq5eu
      @JohnDoe-wq5eu Рік тому +1

      That's pretty amusing and frankly incredible. The stuff left in and taken out of novelizations are always fascinating to me.

    • @UJEvans
      @UJEvans Рік тому +2

      @@JohnDoe-wq5eu the book also gives insight into what the crew members think of the female lead.... And their thoughts are not pure....

    • @JohnDoe-wq5eu
      @JohnDoe-wq5eu Рік тому +2

      @@UJEvans
      I mean if they could spend an entire chapter about looking at this thing's dong I'm sure lascivious and lecherous thoughts are plentiful among the male characters.
      I mean considering the stuff in this otherwise pretty tame Ghostbusters novelization that doesn't surprise me one bit.

  • @TheaterPup
    @TheaterPup Рік тому +11

    I've read all three versions (the novelization and the kids versions). It is quite interesting to compare and contrast actually.

  • @leafyfeathers
    @leafyfeathers Рік тому +3

    20:43 the sound cutting out makes it ten times funnier

  • @straker454
    @straker454 Рік тому +6

    I always enjoy novelizations that are based on early drafts and scripts. The Back to the Future novelization by George Gipe is a favorite of mine. The original ending with the DeLorean driving to a nuclear bomb test site is bookended brilliantly with the original book opening of Marty, already in school and in class where a film of the bomb test from 1955 is being shown to the class. There's a lot of odd changes and I find it interesting that the description of Marty in the book as the outfit that Eric Stoltz is wearing in his performance of Marty, including a US Patent Office T-shirt with an electric guitar on it and green sneakers.

  • @ATippingBarn
    @ATippingBarn Рік тому +4

    I actually do remember reading the ghostbusters 2 novelization and being very confused about extra scenes not featured in the movie. Thanks for the memories, Phelan!

  • @spaghethenoodle
    @spaghethenoodle Рік тому +8

    I'm glad there is no rap rap joke in the book

  • @MissAshley42
    @MissAshley42 Рік тому +13

    I'm impressed by how you made a video talking about a book so visually entertaining. I'm glad to have looked at it. . . _with my eyes!_

  • @GoodOldGamer
    @GoodOldGamer Рік тому +20

    Ernie Hudson on the new Quantum Leap has aged really well. Much better than the other busters.

    • @5roundsrapid263
      @5roundsrapid263 Рік тому +4

      He probably didn’t get heavy into booze and drugs like they did.

    • @otakunthevegan4206
      @otakunthevegan4206 Рік тому +9

      @@5roundsrapid263 The Garfield Movies took a good 15-20 years off Bill Murray's health.

    • @gigabuster_87
      @gigabuster_87 Рік тому +5

      @@otakunthevegan4206 mental health?

    • @TheSmart-CasualGamer
      @TheSmart-CasualGamer Рік тому +3

      I don't think running a Vodka company has done Aykroyd any favours.

  • @MyRetroLife
    @MyRetroLife Рік тому +2

    I thoroughly enjoyed this breakdown of the novelization. Thanks man!

    • @phelous
      @phelous  Рік тому +1

      Thanks! Glad you enjoyed it, man!

  • @garrettcarter5622
    @garrettcarter5622 Рік тому +2

    19:05 - Hey, Peter actually says a VERY similar line in the Video Game. Funny that.

  • @WillDaBeard
    @WillDaBeard Рік тому +3

    Is anyone else loving Phelous getting to roleplay as his heros for a video?

  • @shenloken2
    @shenloken2 Рік тому +26

    Novelizations of movies are fascinating in that they’re kind of like world building! I’ve also read novelizations of other 80’s films like ‘The Empire Strikes Back’ and ‘Clash of the Titans’; and they really do have the luxury of expanding on characters and settings more than a movie is allowed to within so much time given.

    • @mightyfilm
      @mightyfilm Рік тому +1

      I once saw the kid's picture book version of George of the Jungle, and even that included a scene deleted from the movie. Had a photo of the scene and everything.

    • @JimmyC1994
      @JimmyC1994 Рік тому

      My favourite was the novelisation of The League of Extraordinary Gentleman (not as good as the comics but superior to the crap movie in every way)
      That made it a book based on a movie based on a comic based on a series of books

    • @anthonybernacchi2732
      @anthonybernacchi2732 Рік тому +1

      And, IIRC, Yoda is blue in the "Empire" novelization, just as Slimer is yellow in the "Ghostbusters" book.

    • @jacksonteller3973
      @jacksonteller3973 2 місяці тому

      same with the novelization of the Fifth Star Trek film, it adds a lot that would be difficult to depict onscreen

  • @nickthepick8043
    @nickthepick8043 Рік тому +6

    Novelizations are better than people give them credit for. Like the Revenge of the Sith novelization. Vader's reaction to his surgical transformation is the most haunting thing I've ever read. That said, I've put off reading the rest of my Ghostbusters Novel, so I can't watch the rest of the video yet, but as far as I'm concerned, I'm extra-happy today that you got to reading it. Your Ghostbusters content is my go-to when I'm in a bustin' mood. I recommend the IDW stuff if you haven't yet.

  • @samwill7259
    @samwill7259 Рік тому +4

    It's like all the weird parts of adapting a novel in reverse. Instead of having to cut out sub plots to fit within 2 hours of film you need to add them in to make 2 hours of film fit 500 pages of book!

  • @SmeddyTooBestChannel
    @SmeddyTooBestChannel Рік тому +9

    honestly the unused "Later, man!" scene with winston is incredibly fucking funny. i dunno if it would've killed the pacing in the montage, but the delivery is ace.

  • @DrGamelove
    @DrGamelove Рік тому +1

    “I have seen Jazz that’ll boogle your mind.” Much as I enjoy a good curse, that’s a pretty creative workaround.

  • @nickmanzo8459
    @nickmanzo8459 Рік тому +11

    Amazing video Phelous. Novelizations are kind of becoming a lost art, replaced more and more by things like Disney’s kind of reimaginings like UnBirthday and what have you, so it’s interesting to see media like this discussed. Loved it.

  • @wstine79
    @wstine79 Рік тому +8

    Does it include the chapter where Ray and Egon capture the Wabuu ghost while Peter Coulier and Old Man scarf food?

  • @lotus-prince
    @lotus-prince Рік тому +2

    17:40
    Maybe they just changed the design of the prop, but I'd imagine that "trinocular goggles" are supposed to have three lenses rather than two. Either it refers to a different piece of a equipment or they just made regular goggles and changed the name because they didn't want to deal with that.

  • @wstine79
    @wstine79 Рік тому +10

    This sounds exciting. It reminds me of the Ghostbuster 2 comic book adaptation, which was done in the Real Ghostbusters artwork. Even includes the Ray gets possessed side plot.

    • @psychodfunk
      @psychodfunk Рік тому +1

      What about the frog ghost in the subway scene???

  • @Cassandra112
    @Cassandra112 Рік тому +5

    someone that gets the "serious" aspect of Ghostbusters. finally.

  • @jessie3268
    @jessie3268 Рік тому +6

    I remember reading the book version of Gremlins and it was interesting since it went into the thought of gizmo and stripe

  • @kaijukidsam
    @kaijukidsam Рік тому +3

    Potato face, huh? Well I guess now we know why Peter loves to call him "Spud" so much in RGB.

  • @lostnfoundmedia26
    @lostnfoundmedia26 Рік тому +5

    I actually found a children's Ghostbusters book recently called "Lights Out For Ghosts: An Adventure with The Real Ghostbusters" The art is pretty bad and I wouldn't be surprised if it was done by the same people who did the illustrations in the Ghostbusters joke book from a while back. A highlight is Winston left at the station sorting receipts, and Ray apparently has no face.

  • @clippers1731
    @clippers1731 Рік тому +7

    I'm glad that whenever I come back to your channel from time to time, you still make videos about things I would never have heard of even if I tried to find them. I also like how you still post consistently after all these years. Even though you didn't gain that many subscribers throughout time on youtube, nor are you getting many subscribers today, which you certainly deserve, you still do what you love.

  • @iamRAYZILLA
    @iamRAYZILLA Рік тому +2

    As a young kid, I used to not like Ghostbusters for a very odd reason - at the time, I didn't realize other people could be named Ray. Certain parts, like when Venkman encounters Slimer - "It's right here, Ray, it's looking at me" - I used to think Venkman was talking to ME. That weirded me out so much.
    Anywho, I'll do what Phelous says at 8:07. He was totally talking to me when he said that.

  • @DemonicNightmare
    @DemonicNightmare Рік тому +1

    I love how you do an approximation of Lorenzo Music whenever you do Peter's voice, I always get a kick out of it.

  • @RaphBlade7
    @RaphBlade7 Рік тому +9

    I agree novelizations are interesting. Take for example the Dragon Ball Super: Broly light novel which reveals Broly achieved his Super Saiyan form not due to rage but intense sorrow over Paragus' death. I personally like the idea as losing someone can make one feel a variety of emotions as I imagine Krillin's death made Goku feel other emotions besides intense rage (guilt over failing to finish Frieza off & sorrow over losing his best friend & not having a way to resurrect him as Krillin had already died once before & the Namekian Dragon Balls were a no go at the time)! One could argue that Kale achieved her LSSJ form due to her intense jealousy brought on by her fear of abandonment. Sure it may seem counterintuitive to make a light novelization of a Dragon Ball film, but I think it can be interesting & besides anything that might get a person to read is a plus!
    Nice to hear that they hired Ricard Mueller to work as a writer on the Real Ghostbusters cause he did the novelization of the films, as its good to have writers already familiar with the characters & setting. Also, the fact he gave Janine credit for the NO GHOST LOGO is a good call as far as I am concerned!

  • @RaphBlade7
    @RaphBlade7 Рік тому +26

    Ahha, so I was right all along! Ray's ghost BJ was a wet dream all along! As a kid, that scene thankfully went over my head, though I always felt it was a weird dream Ray was having & as an adult I could always accept Ray might have a ghost fetish (consciously or subconsciously) & that it was just a wet dream resulting from said fetish. My other theory was that Ray had an interaction with a SUCCUBUS as its a supernatural entity (demon) that preys on men sometimes in their dreams. Personally, I think it works best as a dream sequence rather than something that actually happened!
    Still, the writer could have gone with the SUCCUBUS angle as some versions depict them as invading the dreams of men! I assume it was meant to be a dream in the script, or that is how the writer interpreted the scene!

    • @Nalwonk
      @Nalwonk Рік тому +1

      I didn't even see that scene until I was in my 20s, the copy we had never had it. It was really weird seeing that out of nowhere.

    • @Cowboy-crown
      @Cowboy-crown 3 місяці тому

      My best friend has never seen ghostbusters not once in his life but somehow can recall that entire scene to me and it frightens me

  • @mikethegrunty5968
    @mikethegrunty5968 Рік тому +6

    11:17 it’s kinda sad when the TV edit works better with jokes than the novelization.

  • @redvelvetunderground
    @redvelvetunderground Рік тому +3

    i admire your restraint in not adding tasha yar saying "i don't belieeeeeve this!" at denise crosby's audition/read bit. also i hate thinking too deeply about the proton packs but man does the fridge logic of the guys getting radiation poisoning from those fuckin proton packs strapped to them for ages really get to me, especially in the novelization's descriptions lol

  • @GloryHulle
    @GloryHulle Рік тому +4

    Thank you for this latest dose of awesomeness, Phelous! You have the happiest knack for finding the oddest yet most fascinating things. I loved this look at the Ghostbusters novelization. Do you think you'll go over the novelization of Ghostbusters II? That reminds me; I should re-watch that movie. It's been so long since I've seen it that I barely remember it!
    Glad you made it through the hurricane safely! But ugh, being without power for so long must have been just dreadful. So happy you're back to normal! Stay awesome, Phelous. ❤

    • @phelous
      @phelous  Рік тому +3

      I don't think there are as many interesting differences in the GB II novel but if I find I'm wrong about that I might go over it. I'd like to possibly go over the comic The Real Ghostbusters in Ghosbusters II at some point though.

    • @GloryHulle
      @GloryHulle Рік тому +1

      That would be so awesome! I'd love to hear your thoughts on the comic - you've always got the most interesting and unique takes on things!

  • @Psilocervine
    @Psilocervine Рік тому +1

    ...I thought I imagined this book but some of these excerpts were like a slap to the face

  • @mightyfilm
    @mightyfilm Рік тому +4

    It's nice to know that Janine and Egon's relationship came from somewhere, and how it was expanded upon in both cartoon series. I always hated how they pawned her off on Louis in the sequel, and then turned them into morons for some reason.

  • @jonbourgoin182
    @jonbourgoin182 Рік тому +1

    I always wondered what the novelization was like. Thanks for making this video

  • @SHINOBI-03
    @SHINOBI-03 Рік тому +1

    This is the stuff I like about these books adaptations of movies. More specifically the ones based on earlier scripts before finalizing them. The differences in favorite quotes, the deleted scenes, reordered scenes, inner monologues, all of that is great to discover.

  • @duomaxwell6523
    @duomaxwell6523 Рік тому +2

    So the Ghostbusters novelization is like either an expansion pack or a parallel dimension version with extra content?

  • @KasumiKenshirou
    @KasumiKenshirou Рік тому +2

    7:49 That reminds me of a scene from an episode of a show on Fox in the 90s called Bakersfield, P.D.. A cop is really exited because his new partner is black, just like in the movies!

  • @Spindash54
    @Spindash54 Рік тому +1

    15:31 - Random New Yorker side-bit, we say the area code as “Two One Two”.

  • @andreasnickmann370
    @andreasnickmann370 Рік тому +3

    11:07
    When Charlie realized that he can't catch the sunlight, he cursed: "oh jazz, raw!"

    • @andreasnickmann370
      @andreasnickmann370 Рік тому

      12:00 Science has nothing to do with breasts. Science is, when Oro flies. SCIIIIIIIENNNNNNCE

    • @andreasnickmann370
      @andreasnickmann370 Рік тому

      12:55 Coca Cola warehouse? What about Aldi?
      Man, we really need Dingo's version of Ghostbusters

  • @keijijohnson9754
    @keijijohnson9754 Рік тому +1

    5:31 - Now this is a meme worthy image if I’ve ever seen one!😂

  • @andreasnickmann370
    @andreasnickmann370 Рік тому +3

    This episode was brought you by Baby Ruth

  • @matthewpaul6904
    @matthewpaul6904 Рік тому +1

    It's funny to hear Ramis and Aykroyd portray Venkman in these auditions.

  • @KillerCaitie
    @KillerCaitie Рік тому +1

    I appreciate the dedication of the handwritten notes! The power was gone for so long!

    • @phelous
      @phelous  Рік тому +2

      Yeah, I was glad reading and taking notes on this novel gave me something to do during part of the black out at least.

  • @ruggiebuggie3195
    @ruggiebuggie3195 Рік тому +1

    We need more movie novelization reviews on UA-cam.

  • @johngleeman8347
    @johngleeman8347 Рік тому +3

    Seeing older cinematic snapshots of famous places like New York City makes me sad. Good review though!

  • @Joseph-ku7eb
    @Joseph-ku7eb Рік тому +1

    Great video. I love novelizations that add extra backstory, scenes, and dialogue. As a few other people have said, the Gremlins novelization by George Gipe is great and definitely worth a read if you enjoy weird movie novelizations.

  • @Ten80pete
    @Ten80pete Рік тому

    Those Baby Ruth references plus your caricature voicing of a more dumbed down Egon (and probably the 80's connection) and I couldn't help but think of Chunk in The Goonies.

  • @Pendelook
    @Pendelook Рік тому +1

    Great video! I love the silly lil non canonical details you can get outta novelizations.

  • @anthonymarziano9984
    @anthonymarziano9984 Рік тому +2

    The novel is like listening to a very water down version of the movie, it's a curious take on the characters as well as adding in some delete scenes, as well as the characters acting out of character.

  • @a_jerk
    @a_jerk Рік тому +2

    The cheery receptionist was probably q5 Janine

  • @mikevltg3
    @mikevltg3 Рік тому +2

    1:31 Oh come on, can't we all just get...Beyond Thunderdome?
    :D

  • @EdgeO419
    @EdgeO419 Рік тому +2

    I didn't know Denise Crosby auditioned for Dana Barrett

  • @trent5501
    @trent5501 Рік тому

    I love how the book gives a backstory to the Frightened Librarian Lady from the first movie about her love life sucking and how the last date she had the guy stole her TV... Richard Mueller is funny as hell

  • @angbandsbane
    @angbandsbane Рік тому +1

    How sad is it that the Superman discussion immediately made me think "Yeah, that's right since Krypton had a red sun he would've been little different from a human."

  • @bashcrash9148
    @bashcrash9148 Рік тому +1

    I own this book and have never read it…
    Now I will.

  • @WOLVERINE25TH
    @WOLVERINE25TH Рік тому +1

    I loved the original novel. Read it several times until I had to tape the already shoddy cover back on. Before the advent of the internet and all the deep-dive wikis, this book had the most information we'd ever gotten on the guys--whatever remained canon or not. Love that they finally reprinted it for a whole new era of GB fans to discover.

  • @ToonamiT0M
    @ToonamiT0M Рік тому

    This was so fun. I'd love more videos like this.Phelous should going over more novelizations of films.

  • @limalepakko6074
    @limalepakko6074 Рік тому +3

    I love your Egon voice

    • @andreasnickmann370
      @andreasnickmann370 Рік тому

      His Wabuu voice: "his Egon voice is sooooooooooooooo stuuuuuuuuuuuuuuupid"
      His Old Man voice: "his Egon voice is completely useless now"
      His Baltard voice: "but Baltard (voice)..."
      His Vegeta voice: "too bad it's Friday. His Vegeta voice is even better on Sundays."
      His Egon voice: "shut up, guys! You're just jealous because @limalepakko6074 said she loves me."
      One of Dingo's Dalmatian puppies: "what does that mean?"
      His Egon voice: "just that: She loves me."
      His Wabuu voice: "was... Was Dalmatians 3 supposed to be dubbed in English?"

  • @jrr2480
    @jrr2480 Рік тому +2

    Great video, I'd love to see you do more novel 📖 adaptations of classic movies like:
    Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles 1990
    Gremlins
    Transformers
    Masters of the Universe
    etc

  • @elwoodjblues
    @elwoodjblues Рік тому

    I got the book and read both movies and I was thinking the whole time was this: So these are all the deleted/alternate scenes we didn't sees:

  • @KaiatoMoon
    @KaiatoMoon Рік тому

    How’d I miss this upload?! I find the idea of novelisations of movies interesting, never read any myself but watched UA-cam videos like this on them. I love the little differences in the story from the original script and random ideas from the authors minds

  • @CactusJackIV
    @CactusJackIV Рік тому +1

    Keep up the awesome work! Love the channel.

  • @christophermcbride2522
    @christophermcbride2522 Рік тому +4

    Cool. I hope this new series continues, and you eventually review the Resident Evil novel series by S.D. Perry.

    • @FNGLHR
      @FNGLHR Рік тому

      Oh that shit is gonna be hilarious.

  • @JJ-ud6xw
    @JJ-ud6xw Рік тому

    I'd guess the Baby Ruth was a winking reference to when Bill Murray ate the one from the emptied pool in "Caddyshack".

  • @GhostofKittyKatDawg
    @GhostofKittyKatDawg Рік тому +4

    I love my copy as it had stills from the movie halfway through. It's a bit dog eared these days though but it's a book that I'll never get rid of no matter what state it's in

  • @EmilyGloeggler7984
    @EmilyGloeggler7984 Рік тому +1

    Honestly, the book makes me appreciate the final films all the more. :) Now, about the Twinkies… how much spores, mold and fungus can they grow?

  • @Grey_Warden_Invasion
    @Grey_Warden_Invasion Рік тому +1

    It's interesting when the novel differs from its movie a bit.

  • @JamiesonHorton
    @JamiesonHorton Рік тому

    Great video! I often wondered how a novelization would read, when one of the lead actors famously improvised most of their lines.

  • @shmikex
    @shmikex Рік тому +1

    I always thought the bums would be stand-ins for eventually having Don Ameche and Ralph Bellamy reprise their roles as Mortimer and Randolph Duke from Trading Places (which had Dan Aykroyd and Eddie Murphy), since they had also appeared as them as bums in Coming to America (which also had Eddie Murphy).

    • @scottgrohs5940
      @scottgrohs5940 Рік тому

      Don Ameche and Ralph Bellamy would have been hilarious as the bums, particularly when one of them starts referencing Chuck Wepner.

  • @saturnknite
    @saturnknite Рік тому +2

    i'm listening to the audiobook of GhostBusters, the narrators voice for Lewis is spot on rick morannis

  • @ruggiebuggie3195
    @ruggiebuggie3195 Рік тому +1

    R.L Stine (creator of Goosebumps) wrote the Ghostbusters 2 novelization.

    • @phelous
      @phelous  Рік тому +4

      He wrote the one aimed at younger kids, the full GB II novelization was written by Ed Naha.

    • @ruggiebuggie3195
      @ruggiebuggie3195 Рік тому

      @@phelous Whoops. My poop.

  • @lorenzolamarche-welker9405
    @lorenzolamarche-welker9405 Рік тому

    The Baby Ruth maybe a reference to Murray's character in Caddyshack with the pool scene?

  • @mattjindrak
    @mattjindrak Рік тому

    I remember starting but never finishing the novelizations of Batman and Back to the Future Part II. The BTTF novel had the deleted scene of Marty meeting Dave outside if Biff's casino. I gotta find those and buy them and finish them.

  • @ari-dynamicarchive
    @ari-dynamicarchive 11 місяців тому

    Seeing the storyboard and then seeing the novelization, I for one would've loved to have seen ghosts of The Three Stooges appear in the Ghostbusters film, lol.

  • @renamon5658
    @renamon5658 Рік тому +3

    Awesome video

  • @mathieuleader8601
    @mathieuleader8601 Рік тому +1

    my headcanon is that the character of Mr. David is actually Dave Saville who is down on his luck after the Chipmunks had a bitter split.

  • @lynngreen7978
    @lynngreen7978 Рік тому

    I suspect that Baby Ruth was a reference to Caddyshack, directed by Ramis, specifically a scene involving Ackroyd.

  • @otakunthevegan4206
    @otakunthevegan4206 Рік тому +2

    And Egon said print is dead.

  • @lotus-prince
    @lotus-prince Рік тому +1

    I always love these reviews of somewhat esoteric media of otherwise famous properties. I eat them right up. Gooomph!

  • @cbhlde
    @cbhlde Рік тому +3

    Great meta with that upload game. 😀
    And great video, as always - I wish, we could see you more often! ;)

    • @phelous
      @phelous  Рік тому +4

      There's a new video almost every Friday.

    • @cbhlde
      @cbhlde Рік тому +1

      @@phelous Damn YT! I rarely get notifications, although following you for years now and hitting the bell icon every time... even twice! :p
      Just for you, I will go back to the good old days, make an entry in Google Calendar to remind me and then I check manually from now on! And yes, I will do this! :)
      Greetings from Germany and have a great new year! ;)