Boltzmann's Entropy Equation: A History from Clausius to Planck

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 тра 2024
  • Boltzmann's entropy formula was created by Max Planck in 1900! So, why did Planck create this equation and how did it end up on Boltzmann's grave? I used primary sources to explain the history of this famous and confusing equation.
    My Patreon Page (thanks!):
    www.patreon.com/user?u=15291200
    The music is from the awesome Kim Nalley of course www.KimNalley.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 420

  • @thomassynths
    @thomassynths 2 роки тому +84

    Correction: `log` is a transcendental function, not a trigonometric function. (Side note: all the trig funcs are transcendental.) Transcendental means that the function cannot be described by a polynomial.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 роки тому +36

      Thank you for clarifying. I had never heard of the term transcendental functions (The problem of learning my math solely to help me with my physics). I wish I could fix my videos after publishing.

    • @profjoshtan
      @profjoshtan 2 роки тому +14

      While this is true, one can, of course, derive the logarithm using only trigonometric functions via infinite series! :)

    • @thomassynths
      @thomassynths 2 роки тому +8

      @@profjoshtan Sure, but the same can be said about using infinite polynomials. So to be more pedantic, the addendum is "finite polynomial".
      (Can also talk about coefficients needing to be a "rational" field, such as real rationals, complex rationals, etc... but simplifying here for the non-mathies.)

    • @thomassynths
      @thomassynths 2 роки тому +2

      @Arthur Fair enough. I've yet to read Wildbergers Rational trig, though I'm a fan of his channel.

    • @nasseemmuttur778
      @nasseemmuttur778 2 роки тому +4

      @Arthur , interesting to follow your debate. Am no mathematician nor physicist but just have an inerest in physics among many other subjects. I never stop learning. Greetings from Mauritius.

  • @jackd.ripper7613
    @jackd.ripper7613 4 роки тому +68

    Bassi.
    You are just friggin' awesome. The most underrated channel on UA-cam.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks - blushing now

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 роки тому +1

      Jack, I decided to start with the life of Planck as that got the most votes AND I am going to Bologna in June to study more about Laura Bassi's life so I will probably make the video about her in July. I wrote more about it (and her) on Patreon:
      www.patreon.com/posts/my-next-video-is-33502544

  • @family-accountemail9111
    @family-accountemail9111 3 роки тому +46

    We had to write an essay on the first and second laws, we had thought we were finished until we watched this now we can rewrite making it a lot clearer how the ideas evolved and correctly attributing them , you're very good at getting the information across and I thank you very much for your work. I will be watching more!

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  3 роки тому +5

      How do you like the video, sorry I made you do more work. I also videos on the origin of the first and second long as you might want to check them out as long as you’re changing things are ready and please tell me if I can help.

  • @anonymous.youtuber
    @anonymous.youtuber 2 роки тому +28

    Thanks for these very interesting stories. So often the historical context is missing from the teachings, which is a pity because it makes the study of science so much more colorful.
    It really struck me that the quantization concept emanated from kinetic gas theory, up until now I was made to believe it was only considered to explain the discrete character of spectral lines in relation to atomic theory.
    Your videos are so enlightening. Respect !

    • @jamesboulger8705
      @jamesboulger8705 2 роки тому

      I worked very hard to understand the historical context because it helps tremendously if you write on these subjects.

    • @MrHARRYGOODNIGHT
      @MrHARRYGOODNIGHT 2 роки тому +1

      The historical point of view also aids in the overall technical understanding of the subject. Kudos.

  • @jakelabete7412
    @jakelabete7412 2 роки тому

    Your 'lectures' are absolutely delightful.

  • @demeloalex
    @demeloalex 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you! So clarifying! Your explanations shine like a sun in my mind!
    🙏🙏🙏

  • @exwhyz33
    @exwhyz33 2 роки тому

    Your videos (all of them) are nothing short of fascinating, not least for the amount of work you put into finding the facts and their lineage - Thank you very much.

  • @anjinsantaipan4393
    @anjinsantaipan4393 9 місяців тому

    Love your videos explaining the history and especially all the interplays between the main characters. Well done and please keep it up!

  • @sonarbangla8711
    @sonarbangla8711 2 роки тому +5

    Extremely beautifully and masterfully explained by Kathy. Why Plank's equation was engraved on Boltzmann's tomb stone is one of paying respect out of indebtedness on the part of Plank, perhaps saddened by the death of a great man and teacher. Kathy you video sounded like music to my ears. Thank you.

  • @pieteruys2032
    @pieteruys2032 2 роки тому +6

    As a student one of the subjects in my final undergraduate year was Statistical Mechanics. I was hugely impressed by the sheer brilliance of the reasoning involved. it is an intellectual tour de force. Thank you for presenting this history

  • @j.raimundosilva2101
    @j.raimundosilva2101 2 роки тому +1

    Your channel is great and unique!!! I just got here and i'm marveled with the context you put to scientific discovery and how people made the theories. Thanks and keep up this great work, it's not easy to find these informations. It would be good if you put your sources on the vídeo description for those willing to research on their own as well.

  • @9613ENKI
    @9613ENKI 2 роки тому

    thank you. this kind of historical context makes clearer even the math of thermodynamics. great video.

  • @picksalot1
    @picksalot1 2 роки тому

    Only recently discovered your videos. Been enjoying them. It's important to get the history right. Thanks

  • @bobbymcdingdong
    @bobbymcdingdong 4 роки тому +2

    Ooooh Kathy, you are spoiling us! Another fantastic entropy video - many thanks!

  • @SudaNIm103
    @SudaNIm103 2 роки тому

    This was my favorite video of yours so far!

  • @BrightBlueJim
    @BrightBlueJim 2 роки тому +2

    I find myself becoming deeply absorbed in your articles, with an ever-increasing enthusiasm.
    Keep it up - you are a gem.

    • @jgboyer
      @jgboyer 2 роки тому

      My sentiments exactly, Kathy is enlightening!

  • @profjoshtan
    @profjoshtan 2 роки тому +3

    From watching this, I have come to appreciate for the first time why we focus on Boltzmann's H-theorem in spite of it not quite doing what many physics teachers who teach it claim it does. In classes where the H-theorem is taught, it is often argued that it proves the second law of thermodynamics. A bit of judicious searching the internet will find all sorts of debunking of that claim and, indeed, it does not *quite* do such a thing. But it is weird that it is a topic, then, in so many statistical mechanics courses. Why this weird theorem that doesn't really have much practical application beyond its cute result? Well, one possible answer struck me when watching this video. This is the work that Planck identified as being the first invocation of the logarithm in relation to statistical mechanical properties. So it is an homage to primacy rather than anything truly fundamental.
    This is why I like this channel. In my physics education, I was taught superficial anecdotes about a lot of this history which gave almost hagiographic accounts of discovery and scientific advancement. Kathy approaches the subject from a much more contextual approach that uncovers some of the weirdness and arbitrariness that still infects our choice for approaching physics to this day. Thank you for this channel!

  • @aletheia4581
    @aletheia4581 2 роки тому +9

    Wow! I've just discovered this channel. Amazing piece of history. Amazing piece of work by Kathy. I think it is important to understand the historical context of physics, which is often disregarded, as we pursue of the fundamental laws of nature.

  • @225rip
    @225rip 3 роки тому

    You put so much energy into your videos.

  • @lawrencedoliveiro9104
    @lawrencedoliveiro9104 2 роки тому +15

    4:42 Maxwell’s equations were derived very much from the experimental work of Michael Faraday. Faraday was a gifted experimenter, but he lacked the mathematical background (indeed, any kind of formal education) to make theoretical sense of his own empirical numbers.

    • @jaybingham3711
      @jaybingham3711 Рік тому

      Adding even more issues of dubious attribution to the mix as today's referenced Maxwell equations are actually Heaviside-Hertz derived equations.

  • @wim0104
    @wim0104 2 роки тому +4

    Your work should be on the freshmen curriculum for every STEM course! I was lucky to have a physics and an optical physics instructor much like this, starting from the basics and open our eyes.

  • @skshum
    @skshum 2 роки тому

    Kathy makes physics history fun to listen and learn. Thank you

  • @swangleewatanakarn7701
    @swangleewatanakarn7701 2 роки тому

    Love your video. Thank you for post it here.

  • @ogbanugot6078
    @ogbanugot6078 4 роки тому +14

    This was so good. Please do Bohr's model and then Planck. But I'll probably watch all four if you do them.

  • @dougieh9676
    @dougieh9676 2 роки тому +3

    Love Boltzmann ❤️❤️❤️
    I’ve been obsessed with Thermodynamics for sometime now. It’s both fascinating and disturbing. Can’t get enough!!!
    RIP Ludwig!!!
    The world wasn’t ready for you in your time but your ideas are common knowledge now.
    More Thermodynamics pretty please. ❤️

  • @Andres-is3lj
    @Andres-is3lj 2 роки тому

    best physics channel on youtube. Rare passion for thermodynamics right here

  • @minioasislibrary5222
    @minioasislibrary5222 3 роки тому

    Kathy, thanks for your interesting video ! this is awesome ! you explained the history that always skip in the class...

  • @klingeron5929
    @klingeron5929 Рік тому

    These videos are incredibly interesting and unique, thank you

  • @Richardj410
    @Richardj410 2 роки тому

    I just found your channel. Thank Thank You. Oh my this is wonderful. Alas how could anyone give these a thumbs down.

  • @enricolucarelli816
    @enricolucarelli816 2 роки тому +3

    Wow! From Spain, all my respect and gratitude. I always thought that the historical development of knowledge is an essential ingredient towards its comprehension. Your videos are amazing 👏👏👏👏

  • @Stafford674
    @Stafford674 2 роки тому

    I have only just discovered your channel. It is awesome.

  • @h2energynow
    @h2energynow Рік тому

    Awesome loved all the illustrations.

  • @hansvetter8653
    @hansvetter8653 Рік тому

    Great story telling! Thank you!

  • @stauffap
    @stauffap 2 роки тому

    I can't believe i've never seen your channel! I have loved videos about the history of scientific discoveries for years! This video especially was very interesting :)

  • @a1m1i1r1g1a1l
    @a1m1i1r1g1a1l 3 роки тому +2

    love your videos, show them to my students. thank you

  • @chinaskarina698
    @chinaskarina698 2 роки тому

    This is a great video!!! Thank you for sharing your knowledge! :D

  • @afowler13
    @afowler13 2 роки тому

    your channel is brilliant!

  • @jhee0419
    @jhee0419 2 роки тому

    Thanks a lot for posting this wonderful clip

  • @codemant5224
    @codemant5224 4 роки тому +1

    I love your videos soooo much! Great information and charming enthusiasm!!

  • @bobvar72
    @bobvar72 2 роки тому +9

    This was pretty awesome! Great history here. I always thought Boltzmann came up with it. My respect for Planck grows even further.

  • @sherafgankhan9327
    @sherafgankhan9327 11 місяців тому

    Madam you are awesome. Ive been out of university since 1999, working as an electrical engineer now. Your videos make me go back in time and question what i have learned. In a good way! Thank you for your videos...

  • @JagdishCVyas
    @JagdishCVyas 2 роки тому

    Enlightning story on Boltzmann's constant. Thanks.

  • @nassehk
    @nassehk 2 роки тому +1

    I really enjoy your videos. As a metallurgist these names and formula were my bread and butter at school but I never knew the history behind them. Thank you and please keep up the good word.

    • @vibratingstring
      @vibratingstring 2 роки тому +1

      Exactly! Gibbs-Duhem equation, Boltzmann's constant, Carnot-Clausius theorem, Curie temperature, Debye tempurature, Maxwell-Boltzmann equation...Nernst heat theorem, Neumann-Kopp rule, Taylor's theorem, Schottky defect, Wulff plot...Poisson's ratio, Young's modulus---alll of them have stories--and many more!

  • @ericreiter1
    @ericreiter1 2 роки тому +1

    I love you Kathy. Curious of your references, sources.

  • @vibratingstring
    @vibratingstring 2 роки тому +2

    This is so cool to hear. Like someone else said below, we learn all the science out of its original context. Really really interesting to learn the dynamic personal interplay that resulted in the seeming magic of modern physics.

  • @valipearuna6372
    @valipearuna6372 3 роки тому

    I can clearly see the passion you have for physics...
    Keep up the good work
    Do some episodes on classical mechanics

  • @arleygutarra9776
    @arleygutarra9776 4 місяці тому

    Absolutely delightful. Thank you very much for your thorough and comprehensive research. I'm currently self studying Statistical mechanics and the relationship between quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics often confused me (mainly because of the intercalation of them, I was unsure if what ideas and/or experimental results inspired the respective equations). Although this is not a university Lecture and you didn't explain the maths, trust me that you really helped me a lot in my studies.

  • @martingrillo6956
    @martingrillo6956 2 роки тому +1

    As I don't like Entropy that much, I cannot consider this episode the best of all the more than good ones you created. It's a bit too much content for a single video to me. Keep up adding your excellent work. Cheers

  • @davidkleinthefamousp
    @davidkleinthefamousp Рік тому

    Ty for a great series

  • @Tom-sp3gy
    @Tom-sp3gy 2 роки тому +2

    Please make a video on Edwin Hubble and George Lamaitre and how Mr Hubble didn’t believe in the Doppler effect explanation of redshift

  • @ABCD_V
    @ABCD_V 3 роки тому

    Awesome ! Please keep making stuff like this ♥️

  • @TheMrgoodmanners
    @TheMrgoodmanners 2 роки тому

    this channel is just awesome!

  • @jbflores01
    @jbflores01 3 роки тому +1

    Fascinating!... as always! Finally found the source of why Quantum Mechanics was created!

  • @Trp44
    @Trp44 2 роки тому

    The real joy you bring is not dependent on anything you say… you are electricity…
    I enjoy so much your grasp of truth

  • @Pedritox0953
    @Pedritox0953 2 роки тому

    Wonderful video Kathy!

  • @neuronerd5211
    @neuronerd5211 Рік тому +1

    Love, love, love! And your enthusiasm is also the best. I've always thought that physicists have the best sense of humor.:))

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  Рік тому +1

      I often think we have the worst sense of humor but I may know too many physicists 🤣

  • @speckofdust272
    @speckofdust272 3 роки тому

    Really great delivery that I greatly enjoyed ... more please 👍🙏👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

  • @artdonovandesign
    @artdonovandesign 2 роки тому +1

    That was an incredible and mesmerizing video! Thank you, Prof. and... What is that beautiful painting on the wall?

  • @diemilio
    @diemilio 2 роки тому

    OMG! My new favorite UA-cam channel!

  • @mariocanedo196
    @mariocanedo196 4 роки тому +9

    A video on Bohr's model would be awesome!

  • @Sandcat87
    @Sandcat87 3 роки тому

    Been on UA-cam since 2007 and never bothered to subscribe to anyone but holy smokes, that was awesome! Do them all, I'll watch them all. Fantastic explanation of a side I'd never known before (read Louisa Gilder's Age of Entanglement, which picks up more or less where you leave off here). Fantastic! Thanks

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  3 роки тому

      Wow what a lovely compliment (and I guess I need to check out the Age of Enlightenment book)

  • @SustainableDreams
    @SustainableDreams 2 роки тому

    Back after a PBS vid. Go get ‘’em Gal! Your narrative surpasses the pros! Thanks for being awesome!

  • @afifakimih8823
    @afifakimih8823 2 роки тому +1

    So all of those years we were wrong!! From today I will introduce students Boltzmann entropy equation is actually Planck Entropy equation.
    And Thanks to this channel, I learn many truth about Science!!

  • @petematthews9346
    @petematthews9346 Рік тому +2

    I had to laugh when I heard "…but we already have a Planck's constant." Reminds me of Euler-how many things are named for or attributed to him? My favorite comment about Euler was that all of the things attributed to Euler should be named for the second person to have discovered them. Anyway, thanks for the wonderful survey of the history of the Thermodynamic Laws.

  • @rasmusfriberg5520
    @rasmusfriberg5520 2 роки тому

    Fantastic work on scientific history. You should actually write a book on all your insights of the scientific history.
    You just made me realize that Planck is an even greater scientist than i thought. It is also easier to understand why he came to the conclusion: "Science advances one funeral at the time"

  • @timjohnson979
    @timjohnson979 4 роки тому +2

    Great video as always, Kathy. Please do all the videos you mentioned. The order is not important, just their stories.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 роки тому +1

      Will do Tim. Don't know how long it will take me but I will definitely make all 4 videos.

  • @user-ym6gp2oz5p
    @user-ym6gp2oz5p 2 роки тому

    Wow very well explained!

  • @tomasb7645
    @tomasb7645 4 роки тому +6

    WOW, EXTREMELY well done. Abstract info enmeshed in practical context makes learning easy and fun; you obviously do this well Kathy!!! THANK YOU for sharing your talent and this great stuff.

  • @jonathanjackson7047
    @jonathanjackson7047 2 роки тому

    Great videos. As a grad student, we would take courses in Statistical Mechanics and Thermodynamics without any of the historical background. It's very interesting to see the evolution of these ideas and how people were thinking about things. As an idea for a future video, I'd love to know how Newtonian mechanics progressed into Lagrangian and Hamiltonian mechanics. We use the later extensively, but I'm not at all sure of how they were formulated. They seem to pop up out of nowhere in Mechanics courses like magic.

  • @climbeverest
    @climbeverest 2 роки тому +1

    Madam you are incredible!! I am loving all your videos, please before history of physics melts away, continue what you do please

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  2 роки тому +1

      Thank you so much I’m not worried about the history melting away as much as me melting but thanks for the nice comment

    • @climbeverest
      @climbeverest 2 роки тому

      @@Kathy_Loves_Physics please I am loving Dirac and the start of positron, if you find more, please, also debroglie, planck, anyone who lived on the cusp 19-20th century, after 50s I think physics became so complicated, thanks!

  • @ulotrichous
    @ulotrichous 4 роки тому +2

    This was a terrific video! Thank you Kathy! I vote for Bassi too.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 роки тому

      Glad you liked it. Now I don't know what I would prefer to win as I want to make all 4 videos next. Hrmm.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  4 роки тому

      I decided to start with the life of Planck as that got the most votes AND I am going to Bologna in June to study more about Laura Bassi's life so I will probably make the video about her in July. I wrote more about it (and her) on Patreon:
      www.patreon.com/posts/my-next-video-is-33502544
      (you don't have to be a Patron to read the page)

  • @rienzitrento8397
    @rienzitrento8397 2 роки тому

    Do all of them . Really interesting thanks

  • @manuelhe46
    @manuelhe46 8 місяців тому

    I’m reading Schrödinger’s What is Life and this really helps the background

  • @brucerosner3547
    @brucerosner3547 6 днів тому

    50 years ago I was taught college physics by the sequence kinematics, dynamics, electromagnetics, and finally a little quantum theory pulled more or less out of thin air. Thermodynamics was taught as a minor theory of gasses and heat engines. Today I believe thermodynamics is far more fundamental and I wish I had studied it in more depth. Modern hot topics like black holes and theories of the universe rely heavily on thermodynamic principles. Incidentally the main reason Planck calculations were so accurate is that precise optical measurement devices were developed at the time for the new electrical lighting industry.

  • @billclinton6040
    @billclinton6040 2 роки тому

    I had to take statistical thermodynamics as an undergrad. It was one of the last courses I took long after I had studied thermodynamics from a non-statistical or classical point of view. The professor was really good and made what could've been a horribly confusing topic somewhat comprehensible. I always marveled at that class because despite its name, the class devoted a big chunk discussing quantum mechanics (we basically derived Schrodinger's Equation from statistical thermodynamics). So, in a bizarre twist, even though I was not a physics major, I have had at least an intro to quantum mechanics. And for what it is worth, that class was much easier than my class on electromagnetism. Anyway, perhaps it was explained (I don't recall though), but now I understand the link between statistical thermodynamics and quantum mechanics and Planck's role. Max Planck's name was mentioned all throughout that course, and I grew to marvel just how brilliant that man must have been. I still have my notes and textbook from that class (even though it has been decades) because many of the derivations we did were quite literally works of art.
    I too have struggled to understand entropy. I know this comment is way late, but I think a follow up to this video that includes Claude Shannon's thoughts on entropy is definitely in order.

  • @ardecki7961
    @ardecki7961 4 роки тому +4

    You're doing amazing work. I really appreciate how much effort you're putting in these videos.
    As for the next topic I would prefer Bohr's theory, but other's ideas seem fine too.

  • @michaelzumpano7318
    @michaelzumpano7318 2 роки тому

    I’m so glad you don’t shy away from a little math.

  • @Zamicol
    @Zamicol 3 роки тому

    Another excellent video.

  • @abelquiron2653
    @abelquiron2653 2 роки тому

    How interesting! Thanks.

  • @TenzinLundrup
    @TenzinLundrup 2 роки тому

    Thanks for this video. I shall now call k, Planck's first constant (usually attributed to Boltzmann). Planck not only introduced it but determined its value.

  • @edwinrg5768
    @edwinrg5768 3 роки тому

    Wooooow. I loved it!
    Amazing video!

  • @PabloMayrgundter
    @PabloMayrgundter 4 роки тому +3

    Bohr. Tho, I'd love to see Gibbs to have this taken to the modern era. He also influences the development of radio which might help with your upcoming vid on TV. Cheers! Great work :)

  • @brucejackson4219
    @brucejackson4219 4 місяці тому +1

    Well presented amiga.

  • @mikebellamy
    @mikebellamy 2 роки тому

    This is clear, accurate and informative.. well done.
    Not spoilt by the shadow of faulty reasoning brought into the subject of entropy by naturalists confusing it to push their philosophy. (nonsense like entropy is not disorder or information is entropy) Although she uses the Wikipedia which is totally confused about the definition of entropy and the second law the quotes used are all ok except one tiny detail. (it confines macrostates to gases only)

  • @petercalkins3011
    @petercalkins3011 2 роки тому

    Kathy; Thank - You, Thank - You, Thanks - You. Your videos are on par with Bronowski's "Ascent of Man" and CalTech's "The Mechanical Universe". Please relate your basis of thermodynamic articles to Einstein's work on Brownian Motion. On another related topic, please bring to life the zeitgeist of the debate between the proponents and opponents surrounding the existence of molecules. The debate that is not appreciated today.

  • @orialtman6176
    @orialtman6176 4 роки тому +1

    I want to hear you tell all of these stories! But if I have to choose, let's hear Bohr's Model. Your explanations of the history really gives my chemistry class the context it's missing to understand it.

  • @xyz.ijk.
    @xyz.ijk. 2 роки тому

    P.S.: I LOVE the outtakes !!!

  • @wellesmorgado4797
    @wellesmorgado4797 2 роки тому

    Thanks for communicating this point the public! These 2 articles by Swendsen (doi: 10.1119/1.2174962 & 10.3390/entropy-e10010015), I believe at least the second one is open, might be of interest by showing how Boltzmann true entropy definition helps to get rid of Gibbs' paradox.

  • @user-li4xn6gm1f
    @user-li4xn6gm1f 2 роки тому

    Wow. wow, wow, a great video again !

  • @shawnmulberry774
    @shawnmulberry774 3 роки тому +9

    I thought entropy was a word from long ago being repurposed
    but I looked and sure enough its first use was in 1867.
    Clausius wins an award for a cool name.
    We get to say this word all the time now.

    • @Kathy_Loves_Physics
      @Kathy_Loves_Physics  3 роки тому +5

      Clausius wins for a lot of things. Grossly underrated scientist IMHO. (not really a humble opinion to be honest)

    • @varahamihiragopu6667
      @varahamihiragopu6667 3 роки тому

      ​@@Kathy_Loves_Physics We call them Newton's three laws of motion, even though the first law was known long before Newton.
      The laws of thermodynamics should properly be name Clausius' Laws. But perhaps his luck is similar to that of Antoine Lavoisier, after whom the Law of conservation of mass was originally named, but later removed

  • @freezoulou
    @freezoulou 2 роки тому +1

    you video are so good

  • @ihbarddx
    @ihbarddx 3 роки тому

    Wonderful presentation. You asked for suggestions for future topics. I would like to suggest Newton's Second Law. In another video, you mentioned (in passing) that it wasn't originally F=m*a. Physics teachers become combative whenever I mention this. No one else on UA-cam (that I can find) has addressed the issue. Perhaps you would be good enough?
    In any event, thank you for your good work!

  • @titicoqui
    @titicoqui 3 роки тому

    a wow presentation

  • @pstark4
    @pstark4 2 роки тому

    Thanks! Love the history. I remember his name but I love those ideas, I didn’t know they were his.

    • @pstark4
      @pstark4 2 роки тому

      I wrote a joke opinion, thinking that youtube counts comments, ei opinions and polemics make you money. Shame all that wind is wasted in reddit when It could support content creators.

  • @shambulardo
    @shambulardo Рік тому

    I don't mind your arms moving all over. At first it bothered me I must confess. Now I couldn't care less. The content and its delivery (pace, style, graphhics, etc) are absolutely captivating. Seriously, I don't mind. It's a part of the package that's totally fine with me.

  • @rogerpitcher2636
    @rogerpitcher2636 Рік тому

    How interesting you make Physics, almost makes me wany to pick up where i left off 60 years ago!

  • @camilorivera4685
    @camilorivera4685 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks Kathy. Greetings from Colombia.

  • @robertgladden9035
    @robertgladden9035 7 місяців тому

    love these videos even tho I am lost after 2 minutes

  • @ELECTRICMOTOCROSSMACHINE
    @ELECTRICMOTOCROSSMACHINE 2 роки тому

    I am a history addict, and this is like crack. Best stuff I've ever heard!.

  • @alphaomega1089
    @alphaomega1089 2 роки тому +1

    1. Theorist. 2. Experimenter. 3. Mathematician. Try to be all three when calling yourself a scientist. Never imagined history could be used to learn anything. An underrated discipline.