Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
The burden of proof in criminal law l definition l general rule l exceptions l legal principles.
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 тра 2022
- The video generally covers the burden of proof in criminal matters, the definition, the general rule, the position of the law on burden of proof under statute, case law & the exceptions to the general rule governing the burden of proof. Contact us for any details on: 0703-490014
I'm counsel Micheal and I have appreciated your service.
You are welcome Cnsl Micheal.
Thanks so much sir. I fully understood you.
# counsel Napoleon
Gulu University
You are welcome
❤
it is interesting how the burden of Rebuttal(BOR) keeps shifting between the prosecution and the Accused if your defence is always solid the ball will always be in their half and sooner or later they will acquit you as long as you keep the BOP less than 95% you're safe It is all mental s calmness and having your facts in check. FAILURE TO PROVE BOP=LOSS OF CASE, failure to rebut evidence effectively can weaken ones case but doesn't result in an automatic loss.
This is to full satisfaction in studies 😊
Thank you counsel but I would like you to explain for me the M'Naghten case
Thank you so much Cornarad,I am in 🇷🇼 but your tutorial has helped me so much
You are welcome sir
You are welcome sir. I wish you the best in your endeavours.
Thanks sir 🙏
You are welcome my brother.
would you please write the cases you have cited in the description. it will be easy to look for them
🙏
Thank you Sir ,,,l really appreciate the fact that, you have made learning easier
You are welcome.
Thank you very much
You are welcome Musiimenta.
Thank you so much
Your welcome
Counsel can't I raise a defence of voluntary intoxication under circumstances like to Carryout an act of revenge with the intent
The purpose of raising a defence as an accused is to adduce (weaken) the evidence of the prosecution, that you committed the crime under intoxication. For your defence to succeed, you must prove that the toxication was involuntary (eg. Another person maliciously added a toxic substance into your soft drink without your knowledge and you took your drink with an honest belief that it was free from any toxicant. However, if the prosecution finds out that the intoxication was voluntary, your defence fails, and you face the consequences of your actions.
An accused person who voluntarily admits and confesses to having committed a crime incriminates him/herself once proves to the court that your confession was voluntary (not obtained by fear or prejudice, or by hope of advantage or lenient sentence). Such evidence is admissible and is used against the accused.
Thank a lot
You are welcome
Thanks much
You are welcome
It's indeed benefiting
You are welcome
More clarification about agent by estoppel
Thank u
You are welcome
Asante
Your welcome.
Webale nyo 😊
Naawe weebale kusiima. Mukama akunkuumire.
😂