The Real Reason SpaceX and NASA Are Going To The Moon!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 тра 2024
  • Use TSR55 to get 55% off your first month at Scentbird sbird.co/3zskBoT
    This month I received...
    Peau by Arquiste sbird.co/3xBQmLc
    #02 Grapefruit & Sandalwood by David's Perfume by David Dobrik sbird.co/3NALfjW
    Well Played by Confessions Of A Rebel sbird.co/3H55HH4
    The Real Reason SpaceX and NASA Are Going To The Moon!
    0:00 Start
    2:00 Why use the Moon
    5:37 Scentbird
    7:05 The perfect environment for space ships
    11:00 Moon port alternatives
    Last Video: SpaceX Is Launching Starship To Orbit In July 2022!
    • SpaceX Is Launching St...
    SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
    Mars Colonization News and Updates
    • Mars Colonization News...
    The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
    ► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
    Business Email: derek@ellify.com
    #Spacex #Space #Mars
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 394

  • @TheSpaceRaceYT
    @TheSpaceRaceYT  Рік тому +9

    Use TSR55 to get 55% off your first month at Scentbird sbird.co/3zskBoT

    • @pimbu936
      @pimbu936 Рік тому

      Hey bud, you don’t know the first thing about material science, engineering, technology, geopolitics, IP theft, practicality, and especially morals. Keep shilling for the CCP & their IP theft campaign and cyberwar against your own country, see how well that turns out for you. It’s obvious you have zero original IP to lose. It’s just hard to wrap my head around someone being such an anti-patriot.

    • @pimbu936
      @pimbu936 Рік тому +1

      Still can’t get over the video you did a couple weeks back on how “China has the most competitive aerospace industry in the world” 😂😂😂 read a book, literally any book on the topic and you might understand what a stupid & foolish proposition that is. Ever heard of intellectual property theft??? Clearly not.

    • @pimbu936
      @pimbu936 Рік тому

      The Chinese Communist shill simultaneously promoting a genocidal communist regime on the other side of the globe & his capitalist schemes lmao

    • @pimbu936
      @pimbu936 Рік тому

      Just remember: the true believers are the first to get sent off to the concentration camps, buddy.

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      @@pimbu936 he is 30 years old but stupid as shit, like any other mouth-breather = just an ideologue and slave to china.

  • @fredestrada2428
    @fredestrada2428 Рік тому +53

    I’ve been saying this a long time ago. Of course all of this comes with many challenges but if you take in account that there are some companies looking into asteroid mining, developing those technologies on the moon is our best bet before trying to hunt down passing rocks.

    • @vincentcleaver1925
      @vincentcleaver1925 Рік тому +1

      Plus the first asteroids we will mine are impact ore bodies in the lunar craters

    • @GrandChessboard
      @GrandChessboard Рік тому +2

      Lol, how old are you? You don't need to be on the moon to monitor passing rocks as you call them...

    • @V3racious3
      @V3racious3 Рік тому

      Asteroid mining is a joke. It would be more feasible and resource conscientious to develop fusion reactors to power matter printers that produce matter out of pure energy.

    • @GrandChessboard
      @GrandChessboard Рік тому +2

      @@V3racious3 spending trillions of dollars trying to mine resources will make those resources extremely expensive so not really worth it unless you want to spend 20 trillion mining 20 ounces of gold. What is gold going to cost or any other resource for that matter...

    • @V3racious3
      @V3racious3 Рік тому

      @@GrandChessboard replying to the wrong person fukwit.

  • @Zuringa
    @Zuringa Рік тому +8

    Argghh! I hate the fact I was so young the last time I watched a Moon landing, but will be so old next time! It's still just as exciting though.

    • @bto1533
      @bto1533 Рік тому

      They never made it to the moon. All lies

  • @RandomVideos66
    @RandomVideos66 Рік тому +16

    If they are going to build bases on the moon, I hope that they'll name them after H G Wells and Jules Verne.

  • @kevinj834
    @kevinj834 Рік тому +26

    I've always said this. From all I understand, it's easier to build megastructures in space. And it's also easier to launch, from space. We should be dedicating more resources to a moon base to help launch us into the rest of the solar system, like Mars and Titan

    • @armr6937
      @armr6937 Рік тому

      I think eventually all heavy industry will move to Luna.

    • @reversicle212
      @reversicle212 Рік тому

      @Kevin J
      Exactly! Going to Mars is a FUCKING STUPID ASS IDEA. Watch Adam Something’s video on why going to Mars is shit

    • @dianapennepacker6854
      @dianapennepacker6854 Рік тому +2

      I agree. A network is the best step.
      Have a nuclear powered station. Use cold welding and 3D printing.
      Build shit.
      The moon sucks for everything. Unless they figured out the space dust problem. Maybe have an inflatable shield.
      I know nothing BTW.

    • @GT_Void
      @GT_Void Рік тому

      Ugh, grow a brain. We cannot got to space- never have never will.

    • @kevinj834
      @kevinj834 Рік тому +5

      @@GT_Void lol why even be here on this video if this is your viewpoint

  • @vic-g
    @vic-g Рік тому +7

    "... in the centuries to come." I love your futuristic world view and this is the reason I would happily pay for your content! 👍

  • @vincentcleaver1925
    @vincentcleaver1925 Рік тому +6

    The best thing ever about the craters is that we should be able to figure out which ones have useful ore bodies in them!

  • @zroku123
    @zroku123 Рік тому +5

    This is a similar thing I say anytime I have a conversation with Someone about colonization. The very first and most important thing we need is to establish a logistics system before anything else. That could be an orbital station or the moon but it needs to be something that can act as a checkpoint between planets and stars. From there we would have the ability to build space only ships that would never touch an atmosphere allowing them to be much larger haulers for people and resources between these checkpoints. With an established logistics system it would be 10x easier to expand beyond our world as we would just need to build more checkpoints to any location we wish to visit.
    Btw we already have the full capability and technology to build a space station or moon base however at the moment no one wishes to pay the astronomical cost it would be to start. On the other hand, whoever is first will have a significant monopoly over the entire aerospace industry and easily be able to get their return as everyone else will be unwilling to do the same thus funnelling through the sole owner of said structure

  • @hawgryder13
    @hawgryder13 Рік тому +5

    At 72 years old I'm just hoping I see us land on the moon again and get started on staying there this time.

  • @Advoc8te4Truth
    @Advoc8te4Truth Рік тому +13

    I always wondered why they committed so much resources to the International Space Station considering how tiny it is when a Moon Base just makes so much more sense?!

    • @douginorlando6260
      @douginorlando6260 Рік тому

      The decision makers did not want change. They wanted a nice safe endless stream of NASA money to the connected corporations.

    • @NSResponder
      @NSResponder Рік тому

      It's a lot more expensive to get on and especially off the moon than it is to go to a space station in near earth orbit. Even 1/6 G is a major gravity well.

    • @thomassherer5962
      @thomassherer5962 Рік тому +1

      Republicans, back in the days actual Republicans roamed the Earth, is the reason. Nixon and Raygun made Lame decisions that have trapped us on this rock for 50 years.
      Since the 60s we had been expecting to travel to the Moon regularly 'anytime'.
      Instead, we became trapped, like Sisyphus, in a seemingly endless cycle of filling up a flying pickup with crews and stuff to go remodel a tincan.
      They had no vision.
      Now, we have repugLieQons, who are regressive wanting to drag Americans back to 7th century BC.
      God only knows how much damage they will cause before Daylight scatters them to the Dark corners.

    • @Advoc8te4Truth
      @Advoc8te4Truth Рік тому +1

      @@thomassherer5962 The 7th Century and since when have Republicans caused irreparable harm to the USA? I think your refering to the Democrats the party of Compassion, the party of BLM, the party of ANTIFA, the party of RIOTS, the party of FREE CRIME, the party of MURDER etc.
      Feel free to blame Republicans for whatever you want being the compete and utter epitome of Palpatine whenever they get even a snippet of power goes to the Democrats however.

    • @rickystarduster
      @rickystarduster Рік тому +1

      the radiation bombarding the moon and lack of knowledge of how to protect against it as well as the cost of launching from the moon even though it has reduced gravity there is still gravity and it was not researched enough at the time. now that we know more it is much for feasible

  • @shnasuel6492
    @shnasuel6492 Рік тому +1

    Definitely an underated channel
    I freaking love your videos

  • @richardcornell6739
    @richardcornell6739 Рік тому

    Enjoy, can't wait. Wishing happy times.

  • @averagejoe8255
    @averagejoe8255 Рік тому +12

    Hey TSR, love your tutorial-style videos. They can be placed on a larger Television for kids to watch and learn from. There are a few mistakes here and there (I’m a retired aerospace engineer), but the tone and flow is really good, and will hold the attention of young ones. Great job! You have my sincere thanks.

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      The id.iot fuck has enunciation~pronunciation errors that are unacceptable to expose children to. Why suggest such child abuse?

    • @terryblack5725
      @terryblack5725 Рік тому

      You are so right that's a great idea!! Hook the young ones get their ideas and watch out!

    • @patrickcummins79
      @patrickcummins79 Рік тому +1

      I sent this to my friend, her kid would like these videos.

  • @richweborg3753
    @richweborg3753 Рік тому +2

    I love these videos. Thanks guys

  • @danwelsh6706
    @danwelsh6706 Рік тому

    Another enlightened video my friend 💯

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      Interesting way to spell "idiot," this "enlightening" thing.

  • @epicdaniel508
    @epicdaniel508 Рік тому +2

    Incredible video! Very well done!

  • @chadlymath
    @chadlymath Рік тому +3

    I've got an entire illustrated story project, in development, regarding this (spanning about a 40-50 future timeline). I plan to share a first draft, publicly, to get some thoughts on fact or fiction (even if there's some intentional fiction, mixed with theory or guesses)... Was working on it for a year or two, then you can say got caught up in its prequel project, that's 10 years ahead & takes place on Earth. But, definitely could work off the moon, & really wonder if NASA or anyone else is fully aware of what prolonged deep space (for Mars, but exposed to it through Artemis) means. I think there's still some unanswered questions, before people personally take that journey deep dive, that between the Earth & Moon can possibly answer.

  • @zombiediet
    @zombiediet Рік тому

    I loved ad astra and the way they portrayed the moon sites! Loved seeing the highway signs on routes to other bases like back home on earth.

  • @ad2mars
    @ad2mars Рік тому

    Just want to say thanks for this kind of video.

  • @evandipasquale9255
    @evandipasquale9255 Рік тому +2

    This was my view as well, I don't think the star ship should be what we use to get to Mars. But rather we should use it's huge payload capacity to build an interstellar ship either in orbit or on the moon. By removing the need for a space craft to have to ability to escape the earth's atmosphere. Having ship built in space and remaining in space really allows you get creative and focus on what's best for the mission at the time.

  • @daviddoherty7171
    @daviddoherty7171 11 місяців тому

    Great documentary

  • @k.sullivan6303
    @k.sullivan6303 Рік тому +1

    Okay...how about some ideas about a revolving space port anchored onto the moon? It still would have to be over 1 Km in diameter to avoid getting sick.

  • @jonatkins229
    @jonatkins229 Рік тому +1

    Is it possible to smelt the aluminum during the daylight hours on the moon? Would the additional heat make it easier for robots or astronauts to make metal from the moon regolith. Could use machines to mine and collect ore then during a certain time could smelt all of it during the hotter parts of the day.

  • @wingsley
    @wingsley Рік тому +5

    Returning to Earth's Moon, and developing bases there for science and industry, should be viewed as essential to meaningful space exploration and our planet's technological advancement. We need to develop cislunar space infrastructure, partly to avoid excessive launch costs from Earth, and partly to make space programs and space industry more self-sufficient. We need to look at the possibilities for developing moonbases in underground lunar lava tubes, which would offer invaluable protection from the harsh environment of the lunar surface (solar storms/radiation, meteors, cosmic rays, temperature extremes). The basins of great lunar craters are filled with the remains of meteors, which were originally asteroids before they encountered the Moon. The former asteroids can contain many valuable substances, including rare earths, which would benefit both lunar/space industry and Earth society tremendously. Colonizing the Moon will undoubtedly mean industrial activity, possibly using robots for production and skyhooks and/or electromagnetic catapults for launching personnel and goods into space. It is not clear if human space programs are prepared to actually settle personnel onto the Moon or Mars full-time. It is not clear if the diminished gravity of these bodies would be compatible with long-term human health. If human health and vitality requires 1.0g, humans could only live on or near the surface of these bodies part-time at best. A necessary element of both spaceports and general space infrastructure will probably have to be orbiting forward bases (space stations) with rotating habitats to provide more human-compatible workspaces and residential spaces with simulated 1.0 g. The raw materials and fabrication for space station components will undoubtedly come from ISRU. (In the case of Earth's Moon, from the Moonbases). Solar power on the Moon's surface would be problematic. But is you have a space station in orbit, you could build a solar power satellite based on a FlowerSat design, capture the sun's rays in space, and beam the power down via Wifi transmission to the bases. Isaac Arthur's science and futurism channel came up with some key videos on the sbjects touched upon here: "Power Satellites" [ ua-cam.com/video/eBCbdThIJNE/v-deo.html ], "Becoming an Interplanetary Species" [ ua-cam.com/video/_Ihdb8-h5Ek/v-deo.html ], "Colonizing Cislunar Space" [ ua-cam.com/video/gOr-Gd58zu8/v-deo.html ], and "Skyhooks" [ ua-cam.com/video/TlpFzn_Y-F0/v-deo.html ]

    • @Myrddnn
      @Myrddnn Рік тому +1

      We also need to stop with the tribalism here on Earth and cooperate to build out the future you describe.

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      Whole lot of womanly phrased noise but no substance to your misuse of text.

  • @fifski
    @fifski Рік тому +3

    I know it's incredibly expensive, but I can see a some kind of a maglev slingshot (or similar) on the moon, Perhaps the best location would be around the equator, and it would go round the moon many times before accelerating to any significant speeds. However, these speeds would open the rest of the solar system to us, without needing 'silly' gravity assists from other planets

    • @gregorysagegreene
      @gregorysagegreene Рік тому

      We need to build one of the Earth first; so we can shoot all the jobless, homeless, and poor people up there first ... my inexhaustible faith in humanity's ability to solve *all* it's problems just hanging tf out there.

  • @kevinsamphere7874
    @kevinsamphere7874 Рік тому +1

    WOW SHIBTASTIC 💯 so many possibilities 👍

  • @JustAThought01
    @JustAThought01 Рік тому

    Good discussion.

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      ... what!?... A discussion ia dialogue, this shit script is a monologue = ranting and not discussing.

  • @carbon1479
    @carbon1479 Рік тому +1

    I'm not as sure that it's that far away. I get that we're used to thinking of colonization as having milestones in hundred year increments but I really think that if we really open space for commercial enterprise we might have significant mining and industrial on the moon, Mars, possibly other places by 2040. What's been missing is money to be made and practical means, and it starts with getting that first stable 'thread' of industrial activity up and running and likely goes exponential after that (ie. more activity and proof of concept means more people looking to pursue mining and industry profit off-planet).

  • @alanrutkowski3332
    @alanrutkowski3332 11 місяців тому

    These are wonderful videos.
    Sure I'm a geek. And I like it because there's others out there i'm not alone.
    The producers of this and other Ideas are right up how I feel.

  • @kuramiian
    @kuramiian Рік тому

    building something on place with lower gravity and use it later to land on place with higher gravity or with atmosphere might not work well or i could be wrong?

  • @rap4656
    @rap4656 10 місяців тому

    Thanks!

  • @bobbutton8081
    @bobbutton8081 Рік тому

    Makes good sense!

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 Рік тому

    I'm wondering if a large enough space port and station built on the moon say if they actually at some point built a moon city say the size of New York what would the effect be in the gravitational pull of earth would it effect the tidal pull possible cause tidel waves and coastal flooding

  • @eugeneminton2613
    @eugeneminton2613 Рік тому

    some day we may be able to move pluto to be closer to the "habitable" zone to mine it? i mean if you can move it, you should be able to spin it faster and turn it into a sat. right?? i do have a very strange question beyond that thou.... how much of the moon would we have to mine as to reducing its mass enough that it would effect tidal currents?

  • @johnbourlier411
    @johnbourlier411 Рік тому

    Let get going

  • @lm7490
    @lm7490 Рік тому

    What's the status of research into zero-g 3D printing?

  • @richardrigling4906
    @richardrigling4906 Рік тому +1

    An L5 space ship factory makes a lot if sense. Even at 1/6 g, the Moon still represents a deep gravitational well. So by limiting Lunar operations to mining and resource harvesting g, coupled with mass drivers (rail guns) to launch refined materials to L5, we get the best of both locations, Lunar raw materials and micro gravity industrial site. Keep in mind, that L5 hangs above the moon, just as does the Earth, therefore, building the mass driver in the correct orientation is a once done problem.
    Also, do not forget that Lunar dust is hazardous to both human lungs and to bearings in equipment - so locating industries off the Moon simplifies a variety of issues.
    Dr. Geral O'Neil, Princeton (?) physicist, detailed this concept in the '70's with his book High Frontier: Colonies in space.

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому +1

      Your touchscreen device betrayed you, it put "huna" where you clearly typed human... I am sick of correctly typing a qord, only to look back and see loes like this, points where letters are missing and replaced qith letters I didn't even touch... look at how it switched out the "w" I vlearly pressed with a "q" and fucked the ford *clearly* into "vlearly."
      These deviced are traitors, designed that way to aggravate us all.

    • @richardrigling4906
      @richardrigling4906 Рік тому

      @@linyenchin6773 I often re read after posting, then edit some more. I'll fix the original

  • @irasthewarrior
    @irasthewarrior Рік тому

    I give you credit for saying compression instead of friction.

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 Рік тому +1

    Once you had a base on the moon and started building rockets and such you could doing shot ships into space with ease increasing the distance we can travel emensly while also lower the fuel load of an intergalactic ship

  • @samracey236
    @samracey236 9 місяців тому

    Landing starship will create a crater that will or might make it impossible to return to orbit. Changing the land configuration to a side landing for a one way landing to establish a base to create a landing pad for future missions.

  • @27maganoo
    @27maganoo Рік тому

    OMG! You have an amazing idea here, Space Port on the moon!

  • @douginorlando6260
    @douginorlando6260 Рік тому

    1st … earth orbit transfer station for rendezvous of dedicated station to moon commute rocket (it’s the fueling station, plus loading cargo plus transferring people)
    2nd… moon colony
    3rd … moon orbit station to assemble huge commute ship from moon metal, earth components, moon fuel, moon oxygen, water, etc. and for people embarking to mars (or earth)
    4th… park the huge ship at Deimos moon of Mars. This is the ideal colony location. Deimos dirt serves shielding as the huge ship is buried and covered. Deimos material fuels all rockets and replenishes water, air food, etc. 24 hour sunlight for energy. Super low escape velocity from both Deimos and Mars
    5th… The metal asteroid. If it’s the center of a planetoid then it’s worth more than anything else in the solar system.

  • @jurgennolte7577
    @jurgennolte7577 Рік тому

    Yup build a space station and then you can build big ships on that with smaller ones in a space garage for use in entering and leaving a planet.

  • @Agent77X
    @Agent77X Рік тому

    This has all ready done in: Space 1999! TV Show!

  • @oldmountainmarineandmetals9736

    I have already applied for a job erecting the Space Port's many panels that it's going to take and from what I've been told it may be a one way ticket but, that's alright

  • @robertpaul7048
    @robertpaul7048 Рік тому

    What about the dust problems??

    • @Riteaidbob
      @Riteaidbob Рік тому

      No one seems to care about that.

  • @stonehaven2289
    @stonehaven2289 Рік тому

    Host: It takes a couple of days to get to the moon..
    DARPA: Hold My Beer 😁

  • @thomasherzig174
    @thomasherzig174 Рік тому

    most serious studies for lunar habitats chose sites close to the poles, which offer locations where sunlight is almost permanently available, and we also are close to permanently shadowed regions where water Ice can be mined.
    With team of scientists I made a design study for a Moon Habitat funded by the European Space Agency . We found a suitable place on the lunar South Pole where the longest dark period only is for 4 days twice per year. So, the problem of 14 Days of lunar night can be avoided. And we don't need nuclear reactors to produce electricity ,because natural sunlight is available almost constantly.
    Regarding the use of resources from the Moon to produce fuel and even build spaceships in future, and benefit from the low delta-V, I totally agree. And even for these industrial processes sunlight can be used to melt metal inside a solar oven

  • @gordonsmith5589
    @gordonsmith5589 Рік тому

    Miles, not klicks for FS 🤦🏻‍♂️

  • @Josh-si4rx
    @Josh-si4rx Рік тому

    Agreed

  • @AcidGambit419
    @AcidGambit419 Рік тому

    We need to learn how to cut and stack giant rocks on the moon and mars. Far more efficient option for building large structures without having to transport material. That or we need a way to make lunar and martian concrete with local supplies.

  • @johnstewart579
    @johnstewart579 10 місяців тому +1

    Looking forward to humanity finally returning to our Moon and inspiring new generations. We are, in fact, the last generation to be able to look up at a totally uninhabited Moon.... for now

  • @marknelson463
    @marknelson463 Рік тому

    Just wondering if we can live on the moon when it has been reported that the moon dust destroys space suits within 24 hours. Not the suits themselves but the dust gets into the joints and makes the suits less airtight according to the reports that I have seen.

  • @Rose_Harmonic
    @Rose_Harmonic Рік тому

    8:30 correction. Not friction, compression of the air is what turns it to plasma.

  • @erikwalters5142
    @erikwalters5142 Рік тому

    7:33 plag or plague? lol

  • @matthewprovencio6020
    @matthewprovencio6020 Рік тому +1

    Could there be any danger with the tides or any other moon related activities if we changed the weight of it through mining and taking resources back to Earth?

    • @darylingoteborg3178
      @darylingoteborg3178 Рік тому

      Infinitesimal at best unless we worked at it for an extreme amount of years and never took notice of the analysis data from the changes wrought

  • @duanium
    @duanium Рік тому

    A big honking around the lunar equator particle accelerator, a cryogenic laboratory in lunar caves, a radio telescope shielded from earth radio traffic on the other side of the moon, an astronomy observatory, and a whole bunch of other applications that become available as time goes on as soon as the establishment of the first lunar cities get built on the Moon....

  • @MaxB6851
    @MaxB6851 Рік тому

    Can't parts for rockets be manufactured on the Moon and hauled into orbit with a cable to be assembled there?

  • @kevinsamphere7874
    @kevinsamphere7874 Рік тому +2

    This makes me wonder if it is possible to somehow create an atmosphere on the moon first before we do it on MARS ???

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      No, it can not be created but it can be generated, formed, crafted or produced at tremendous cost that is beyond the scope of power in our global economy.
      Finote beings NEVER *"create"* aka *manifest something from nothing.* Only mouth-breathers are stupid enougn to mistake our powers of generation as the act of "creating," the type that ate stupid enough to take this channel as brilliance rather than see it as the stupidity that it is.

    • @96ace96
      @96ace96 Рік тому

      Sure we could. It would be quite a bit easier than doing it on Mars. If we're lucky it'll only take 5 centuries or so before we have something that won't instantly kill you if you step outside without a space suit.

    • @GrandChessboard
      @GrandChessboard Рік тому +1

      We cannot do that on the moon or mars due to the lack of a strong magnetic field...

    • @96ace96
      @96ace96 Рік тому

      @@GrandChessboard Nah. That's a misconception. A magnetic field stops the atmosphere from being stripped away over millions of years. That's nothing on geologic terms, but if terraforming mars takes 5000 years it'll still barely be noticible.

    • @GrandChessboard
      @GrandChessboard Рік тому +1

      @@96ace96 nah, you would first have to add enough greenhouse gas to over come the amount lost which we have not come up with. Solar winds are intensifying so to achieve we would have the release an ever increasing amount. What good will that do when there is no magnetic field to protect life in the first place in a terraformed planet. A thin atmosphere is meaningless if life can not survive high energy particles and radiation...

  • @kingace6186
    @kingace6186 Рік тому +1

    Why Space X is partnering with NASA so often. Because the Artemis Program will turn the moon into an interplanetary gateway "station" (to Mars).
    And, of course, cooperating competitivity leads to better results in a more efficient & timely manner, as opposed to individualistic monopolism.

  • @ryanlebeck259
    @ryanlebeck259 Рік тому

    Hardened Structures is a company that builds bunkers. If they designed a geodesic dome then it would hold strong against the environment of the moon.
    The group that does the underwater farms could work with them to design a system that with dry hydrogen cells the 'hyrdogen distillation ' effect to form clean pathogen free water for the system.
    Culturing Lichens would provide oxygen and deplete carbon dioxide (as would the farms) with minimal energy cost (insofar as resources we're concerned.) and electrostatic separation could be used to 'vacuum' up the rock and dust for the moon and categorize the different material for later use so that the mineral content of the water is properly formulated by each plant growing in the farms.
    The technology exists, as does the technology to design a low fuel craft to carry the supplies to the moon.

  • @Bareego
    @Bareego Рік тому +2

    The point of the Moon is, that you could build a railgun to shoot mass into orbit. No atmosphere, low escape velocity, and also it would be easy to keep the superconductors requiter cool enough without need for cooling devices. Why would you use a rocket when you can just use electricity to accelerate the mass from the Moon.

    • @darylingoteborg3178
      @darylingoteborg3178 Рік тому

      This was proposed in (among other things) the original cyberpunk roleplay sourcebook 20 or so years ago

    • @Rose_Harmonic
      @Rose_Harmonic Рік тому

      Keep in mind that vacuum is a great insulator. It would take an entire day for a body to freeze in space. Cooling would have to be done using radiators. There would probably be entire facilities of radiators that coolant would be cycled to and from.

  • @indigdoc
    @indigdoc Рік тому

    There will be a moonbase or 3 in your lifetime. Loving all of your optimism.

  • @Freshwaterboy
    @Freshwaterboy Рік тому

    Helium 3 for Aneutronic fusion fuel. Pretty much it.

  • @billsmart2532
    @billsmart2532 Рік тому

    It would be wonderful to build industries on the moon, begins with mining of raw materials, then refinement of those, followed by manufacturing.

  • @dentonator2010
    @dentonator2010 11 місяців тому

    One of the biggest drawbacks is trying to manufacturer on the moon is the apparently lack of appreciable amounts of copper. I'm not saying there's none, but from the regolith that has been tested don't seem to have much Cu. In addition to silicon, most of our technology requires copper. You might be able to get away with using aluminum, but your electric motor and wiring won't be as efficient and you run higher risk having the wires getting too hot and decomposing the insulation causing shorts or fires, if in O2 atmosphere.
    Hopefully they find useful amounts of Cu so that we can bootstrap mining operations.

  • @XAirForce
    @XAirForce Рік тому

    Bet you we could get it done and goto Mars in 10 years if we build up Starfleet which I started 12 Jul 2022 in-line with JSWT picture release. Starfleet Adm. Abe One K’Nowledge - Jedi

  • @robcastleton3359
    @robcastleton3359 Рік тому

    Cepot, eh?
    I just did like 10 minutes ago until I blazed that shit down dude

  • @VenturiLife
    @VenturiLife Рік тому

    Interstellar means between stars. So it wouldn't be an interstellar spaceport. Interplanetary is closer I guess, but the moon is not a planet either, but a satellite planet. The blue lava "lake" on the moon would be very high in Titanium percentage-wise.

  • @serronserron1320
    @serronserron1320 Рік тому

    space is big

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 Рік тому

    You could harvest the matter from space to make huge earth batteries to start with and help make clean energy for a space station

  • @SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands
    @SideWalkAstronomyNetherlands Рік тому +3

    Don't see Nitrogen in those lists, with out it you can not grow food...

    • @starlex8334
      @starlex8334 Рік тому

      import nitrogen aka trade

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      The word is without, it is not two words but one.

  • @zarl5238
    @zarl5238 Рік тому +1

    With all the negative stuff going on on our planet i plan not to end it all now but to wait till we reach the Moon and then Mars...then i can go with a smile on my face knowing that the human race will survive :)

  • @anthonybautista531
    @anthonybautista531 Рік тому +1

    It's very simple why we're going to the Moon the Moon doesn't have an atmosphere quite like the Earth where we can exist without extra equipment for oxygen and pressure differences therefore if we can make a space station on the moon we can make a space station and other planets

  • @timthompson7205
    @timthompson7205 Рік тому

    You’re forgetting the most important part... oil
    You can’t make anything you need there without oil.

  • @zackfox5222
    @zackfox5222 Рік тому

    Even though the new space race will be a race of manufacturing in space/ on the moon, I'm here for all of the advancements it will bring. Imagine Google mapping a lunar base and being able to go down the halls. Even though only scientists and the wealthy will physically go there first, being able to view it in first person virtually will be amazing. (I know I'm making assumptions, but it's safe to assume all non-classified areas will probably have a virtual tour type feature).

  • @seriousbutfunny2
    @seriousbutfunny2 Рік тому

    Wonder if changing the composition of the moon will have adverse effects on the Earth?

  • @aquariussoda007
    @aquariussoda007 Рік тому

    Build on the dark side or twilight.

  • @robertjohnson7960
    @robertjohnson7960 Рік тому

    You forgot helium 3

  • @samdonelson8050
    @samdonelson8050 Рік тому

    The Scifi writers Heinlen, Azimov, they were all about starting at the moon.These books were writen during the fortys and fiftys

  • @kevinsamphere7874
    @kevinsamphere7874 Рік тому +1

    GO SPACEX SPACEFORCE & NASA.

  • @tr7b410
    @tr7b410 Рік тому

    According to remote viewer Ingo Swann, there is an alien base on the dark side of the moon involved in a mining industry.
    Spoiler alert;they are not the warm & fuzzy type.
    How that translates into a successful earth driven colony on the moon should be an interesting engagement.

    • @jebes909090
      @jebes909090 Рік тому

      ya cause they cant find EVERYTHING thats on the moon in the asteroid belt and have a much easier time with it too.

  • @jamespalazzi7990
    @jamespalazzi7990 Рік тому

    It's so important that we get some Men & Women living on the Moon In a self sustaining environment.
    Then on Mars.
    The Earth is not going in the best Direction.
    Man cannot change it at this point.

  • @dalemogk38
    @dalemogk38 Рік тому

    @10:15 or so - gravity on Luna is 1/6th earth, not anywhere near 1/4 earth's gravity. Knowing something about your subject is desirable.

  • @rennyotolinna2863
    @rennyotolinna2863 Рік тому

    It is not bad to think and even plan these matters for a long period of time, say 100 or 200 years, it is very likely that resources will be needed present there, but right now I wonder if they have thought about how to send the giant machines and put them in a factory to made that chips on the moon, if right now on earth and with abundant water just under a dozen producers of high quality semiconductors and only two of the highest technology (counting TSMC), apart from having to not not only develop but invent a mining that does not use water (necessary to produce alumina among others) Another approach to the subject may be to send the raw material to the earth, but a method to do so is not yet known, unless the mythical space elevator is invented. Other challenges not mentioned is the harmful lunar dust, which would need to build solid landing strips where the spacecraft land without covering everything with that dust, and even then, how to deal with what inevitably spreads everywhere. But, you have to start with something, only you don't have to have false expectations and learn.

  • @onlythewise1
    @onlythewise1 Рік тому

    people body will suffer lack of gravity get weak so how fix that

  • @robertroberts9178
    @robertroberts9178 Рік тому

    The moon worst issue? Moon dust. Micro Fine grains of sharp glass-like dust. Scratches, rubs through holes, clogs, clings, and as you can imagine.. quickly ruins everything. Like keeping sand out of your car at the beach, though many times many times as worse, it's everywhere. Even floating in the air of the capsule sitting on the moon. Longest stay on moon is days because of it. Less building a factory on it to mine it into aluminum rockets ships.
    Though side note: to drop off guided warheads completely fixed and enclosed? No atmosphere, minimal gravity? Be a warship in the sky

  • @davidking6174
    @davidking6174 Рік тому

    Well in space you can build bigger spaceship I do hope they're built faster.

  • @AndriasTravels
    @AndriasTravels Рік тому +1

    Moon dust is a game-stopper. See "The Problem with the Next Moon Mission" by Real Engineering.

  • @U.K.N
    @U.K.N Рік тому

    Me deciding whether I should watch this vid or a WorldBox vid : 🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯

  • @rchristie5401
    @rchristie5401 Рік тому

    ilmfao! "We should build spaceships on the moon". Good luck with that.

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 Рік тому

    If enough matter was transported to the moon and increased it's weight I'm sure it would take a lot but it would have it's effect on earth probably should be careful what they do up there I've seen all those dooms day movie's where the moon blows up not good but what if it gets to heavy

  • @josephhartwell6214
    @josephhartwell6214 Рік тому

    This makes since they should be investing everything into this and further population of our solar system

  • @stevemickler452
    @stevemickler452 Рік тому

    Although I agree that the gravity of the Mood is a huge advantage, I must mention an often overlooked method to create artificial gravity: a hanging tether in orbit around Earth or another planet. A tether thousands of miles long will create “gravity “ at it’s top and bottom ends. Such a tether could be sized to create Lunar level or greater “gravity “ and spacecraft raised to the high end would “fall” away giving them velocity toward escape to an interplanetary trajectory.

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      *generate not "create," you generic mouth-breathing piece of shi.t.

    • @darylingoteborg3178
      @darylingoteborg3178 Рік тому

      Look up ‘space elevator’: a proposal set forth at least 30 or 40 years ago

    • @stevemickler452
      @stevemickler452 Рік тому +1

      Yes I was reading about beanstalk tethers decades ago but hanging tethers don’t come all the way to me ground. One interesting aspect is that as the tether is constructed the velocity needed to match the lower end”s speed goes down. If the tether can push against the Earth”s magnetic field to raise its orbit the velocity needed to put payload in orbit goes down. Alternatively solar electric propulsion would greatly decrease the propellant that would have to be brought up with the payload. As the tether gets longer it gets easier to make it longer.

    • @darylingoteborg3178
      @darylingoteborg3178 Рік тому

      @@stevemickler452 the greatest thing about the space elevator concept is it stays stationary while the earth moves so you can can basically go up and by the time you come down you’re in a different place.
      It’s quite similar to the space folding idea of circumventing faster than light travel via manipulation of volumetric distortion: although personally I’ve been a fan of superluminal effects and photonic entanglement as a means to life hack the limitations of distance over time limits.
      I’m sure science will propose many more viable solutions given enough time though

    • @stevemickler452
      @stevemickler452 Рік тому +1

      The type of tether I”m describing is in orbit and the period off that orbit is determined by its center of mass.

  • @iheartbadmemes
    @iheartbadmemes Рік тому

    Moonbase spaceport is "first interstellar spaceport" 🤐

  • @BIGBaNANaBender
    @BIGBaNANaBender Рік тому +1

    Yes the reason is they want to be the first

  • @alainarchambault2331
    @alainarchambault2331 Рік тому +1

    If we have to go deep to avoid solar radiation, those ancient lava tubes are the way to go. They may even lead down to access rarer elements. Business is the only real reason to travel the solar system. With excess ores that can survive being shot through Earth's atmosphere to hit the surface in designated areas.

  • @EditioCastigata
    @EditioCastigata Рік тому +1

    Titan*i*um, Alumin*i*um

    • @linyenchin6773
      @linyenchin6773 Рік тому

      Aluminum has only one "i" and we do not pronounce the word like trash of mere england, it is never "al-lew-min-e-uhm" but *al-oo-min-um.*

  • @christophermacleod2599
    @christophermacleod2599 Рік тому

    I think we have to get off world as a species to be truly able to survive but personally i think we should be buildinf underground

  • @Hedriks
    @Hedriks Рік тому

    Every element and mineral that we have on Earth will be on the moon plus so much more that we don't even know yet. The earth is a floating magnetic body (the effect of the tides is evidence on earth). It attracts all elements in space to its presence. It is like one smart recycyling mass machine. More capable beyond our human understanding of the subject.