The Real Reason NASA Is Developing 100s of Mars Helicopter Drones!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 лип 2022
- NASA Reveals Plans to Find Life On Mars using a fleet of Ingenuity drones and more Space News!
Last Video: How NASA Plans To 3D Print A Mars Colony!
• How NASA Plans To 3D P...
SpaceX News and Updates: • SpaceX News and Updates
Mars Colonization News and Updates
• Mars Colonization News...
The Space Race is dedicated to the exploration of outer space and humans' mission to explore the universe. We’ll provide news and updates from everything in space, including the SpaceX and NASA mission to colonize Mars and the Moon. We’ll focus on news and updates from SpaceX, NASA, Starlink, Blue Origin, The James Webb Space Telescope and more. If you’re interested in space exploration, Mars colonization, and everything to do with space travel and the space race... you’ve come to the right channel! We love space and hope to inspire others to learn more!
► Subscribe to The Tesla Space newsletter: www.theteslaspace.com
Business Email: derek@ellify.com
#Spacex #Space #Mars - Наука та технологія
Great content. As always bringing content forward that I will probably hear about in a week or so.
Keep up the great work 👍
They should start with Aerostats (Mini-Blimps and Balloons). The raise into the atmosphere when the Sun is up, and land on the regolith when the Sun goes down. Just cameras, probe arms and detectors, with telemetry uplinks to satellites. Super cheap - so much so that 20,000 of them could be in place with just one mission to Mars. Gyro-copters are very expensive, complex.
Great idea
Are you aware of how light the martian atmosphere is lol.
@@yuriaddict4245 Indeed, looks like we have to use the balast system to the nth degree! (Around Mars in 80 Days Balloon, lol) - Sorry, my humor is suffering from heat stroke...
Angry astonaut did a video on that - before i had never realised - Hydrogen balloons would be totally safe -- no oxygen for combustion
@@tonyug113 Mars the place where zepphilin survive
Thank God.
Now we can finally play Ride of the Valkyries or Fortunate Son on another planet.
I love your videos. You are a great teacher & communicator!
Why can't those core samples just be stored in the explorer until the retrieval vehicle comes? Wouldn't that make it a lot easier to find the samples? They would be much less likely to be buried in a dust storm or damaged by a meteor near miss. I've never heard the logic behind doing it this way, dropping them in random places to be picked up in several or many years. They are tiny and the rover is the size of a VW!
1: perserverence can shot down in any moment.. for this they let the sample down.. and 2: perserverence she make selfie with every sample she take.. and the other rover have a shovel it.s not problem to take them..
@@youandme4ever46 Good English dude 👌
@@danielkrikorian8727 i don.t give a fuck about my english dude.. if i understand,write and speak i don.t care if i write corect gramatical or not!
yes. this is my question too. it seems kind of stupid to throw them all over the place randomly, instead of hold them in a single place!? 🤷
@@johnpenner5182 If the samples are stored in the rover and it dies they're lost unless the entire rover is retrieved.
Your thumbnails look amazing.
The coptors are useful for radar mapping the caverns and caves of Mars..
A lot of free storage space awaiting us there, just needs 3D mapping... :)
Lol google Maps has to start somewhere
Nice video!
I think this sounds like China testing technology that will allow them eventually to capture smaller astroids. Which when scaled up would be highly useful if they decide to mine astroids.
Right on. NASA is no looking for life. It is looking for minerals and other things to exploit in space exploration.
China won’t be a country long enough to get there.
Asteroid mining is a valid and great idea.
Why we haven't attempted it yet. When there is so much $ to be made from it. unbelievable.
The state of robotics would allow for the entire thing to be automated.
The use of renewable and cheap power also valid. Does it matter if it takes longer if it costs nothing to operate ?
Or a test for when apophis comes by
If the rover can turn over a rock, that might help to find protected amino acids. A recent meteor crater or rock slide would be other places. I wonder if NASA plan to do that?
Turn over a rock? bruh, fr?
@@hasanabireactionsclips Perhaps with some long lever?
Great content.
Great show! Lots of current reality details! Not sure I agree with all described plans, but experiments are the basis for scientific theory refinement! Whoohoo!
the martians are like; I saw a ufo...i swear!
Your outro speech is still cut off bud! Great vid as always.
Just a thought. Take a copter over one of the rovers to see if they can blow off the dirt from the solar panels. Also, they want to go deeper into the soil on Mars. Perhaps creating an impact of their own, then send in the core sampler after impact. It probably wouldn't need to be very deep...just deep enough.
Elon is a good guy and I think he's got a good ideas what he needs somebody to put them into Overdrive
I'd go up to Mars with a shovel for 83 million, saving you 2 million.
they have developed a new way of drilling using fusion technology to melt and vaporize the rock, miniaturizing one and putting it on mars to drill in deep could be a viable option
They've had it for decades that's how they built secret underground tunnels across us
Can you give more details on this, especially names?
In the series 'Mas' they use a series of drones to scout and provide aerial data for Martian astronauts.
What exactly does this drone do? I never seen any pictures from it and it can’t do much of anything else if it can’t lift nothing but itself. What good is it?
If they could develop a kinetic penetrator Something that takes a core sample as it penetrates With Leaver bars at the end of the shaft t That would effectively use the impact to then recoil eject an in capsulated sample core Maybe with something so it can be tracked And then retrieved by the helicopter There's not much in the atmosphere for it to burn up on Reentry It would be an easy way to collect a lot of samples , Depending on how you design the penetrators You should be able to go down to depths as much as 40 feet Assuming you don't hit any rock
Verrry nice you think there is gold has to be right
That's great and all, but we have to start looking at other ways to detect other forms of life in the universe.
Some one please let me know where he gives us the real reason for 100’s of drones as stated in the title.
So now we have internal propelsion devices . Why are we not using them?
LOVELY ! i LIKE MUCH YOUR NVIDEOS 1 GOD BLESS YOU !
Like to know why if a small dull rottor copter , that is needed to left a small amount of weight dos it mean those large raptor engines will work the same on mars has earth in order to land?
Imagine, you're just looking for life on Mars but found gold instead? Kidding, it's really the other way around.
It's definitely a good idea to test and develop colonization techniques for long term space missions, but the real question, Will the drones deliver for Amazon and Domino's Pizza?
Yes some lived to go on . Now look at our earth . Here we go again
Explosion 💥💥💥
Elon sez wait till April 2023...
How much power to lift more weight
I like your videos, it would be Cool if you made videos longer. I like the Content.
Great for kids to watch.
Keep Up The Good Works.
😎👍👍🔭📡🌌🎶
Try a propeller powered balloon next. With propane. Or whatever gas would lift it.
What NASA and Space X can do, is build and test inflatable modules and test them on the ISS, for future deployment on new Space Stations.
How do you fly in such thin atmosphere
Make a big one to retrieve everything.
Whenever I hear about destroying asteroids, I can’t help but hear Aerosmith in the background. “I dnt wanna close my eyes…”
Why can't they just put a small propeller above the solar panel to blow dust off as needed?
NASA stands in the way
They need to send a Boston Dynamics Spot robodog to Mars next time.
Do we have a rough idea of when astronauts will go to Mars?
September
Musk recently mentioned 2029 for a Space X manned mission.
@@distantthunder12ck55 Thank you!
@Phil Failla Why decades? Are you unaware of the spacecraft presented in this very video? What magic would make it take them decades to get to Mars? Smooth brain.
Never. It's fake
There’s an area by the ice caps where the temperature is warm enough to thaw it out and then it freezes back in the night time but I believe there’s a zone we are water is liquid they just don’t wanna let us know just yet because other people from other countries and private businesses we’ll be headed there the next morning
Strange. The hought that an asteroid 780m long should have enough gravity to have a moon and to allow a spaceship to rotate around it.
So when I was climbing a mountain (hill) in Ireland and I felt like the neighbouring mountain was trying to pull me maybe I wasn't imagining it.
for the outsider, science happens when something spins. a rocket does not spin, so it is boring after the big boom lose its natural sting. literally. had a few media guy in my lab a few weeks ago, show them the insanely expensive equipment, some nice color changing liquid some other experiments and such, only two thing really interested them, the needle used for precise measure of small amount of liquid (needle, spooky) and the spinning magnet that helps to mix liquids, one of the cheapest stuff in any lab. it spins, so it is sciency.
I really liked the impressed Chuck Norris :D --> 1:10
Maybe one day they'll dig deep and find bones of ancient life
@11:31 'Everyday an Astronaut'??
I did hear about a mock up to a much larger drone? Not to lift a human but about a 100 pounds. Airships seem better for that purpose.
Why they did not use the quantum particle physics the study the quantum structure and use the chemical to difuse the atoms in the big stone so it will be changed to ash and collected with a sample and the world will be safety place using the capturing by running the same speed as the large stone it is possible to do that a guess ..so it will be a permanent solution on the earth dwellers thanks
put Ingenuity on Fcc mode!
you won`t have to fly few hundred meters.
Oh yeah we now have hyper missilse
Nice Armageddon reference
why dont they just use an explosive to penetrate deeper into the soil...they could actual open up a large area and discount material identified with the explosion itself...seems like we are moving in slow motion on all of this...the Saturn program would still be on the ground if it moved at this pace
What if they find life on mars and return in here and it gets out?
Yes, since we didnt find HollowEarth, there must a thriving civilisation in HollowMars. OFC!
I am probably in the minority hoping that they do not find life on Mars. If they do find something it will most likely be some uninteresting microbes. If they do then there will probably be a focus on preserving them. In my opinion this will get in the way of what we really need to be doing and that is colonising Mars, finding water sources to sustain life.
Plenty of life on earth yet we don't preserve it here what makes you think we will do it on another planet?
@@antonbriggs5680 - because it will be alien.
We do not need to colonize Mars. At all.
@@anatomicallycorrectmuppets8180 You backup your computer don't you? We need to backup the human race.
@ Muppets - not many people realise this but with our current technology we CANNOT detect an Earth destroying sized meteor within a 100 year window. Hence there could already be an Earth destroying meteor on its way within 100 years. We also currently do not have the technology to deflect such an object despite what Hollywood might suggest. If it wasn’t for SpaceX we would still be relying on Soyez. NASA have had zero intention of progressing our space fairing technology. If left to government we would still be using Soyez in 2100. I genuinely believe in 70 odd years from now mankind will be saying thank you to the foresight of one individual who decided to push the boundaries of reuseable space Tech.
When is the next manned mission going to the moon?
Officially it is 2025 but it is likely to be at least several years later than that, if not longer.
big bro
Land in the CYDONIA region of Mars. We know there was life there.
I have mentioned to Elon that the infrastructure of Tesla has to be increased by starting a Tesla Texas rental. This will allow more people the opportunity to drive a Tesla for a week or a month allowing them to be the next on the list for a lease or purchase, if so inclined. Also small businesses have to come before the multiple fleet sales by corporations, this allows more distribution of product amongst the population again offering more free word of mouth advertising. So orders under 10 come before orders over 10 or 100 this prevents someone like Herts rental to get all their Tesla's before the starter businesses do. Until production of the Tesla Semi can reach more than 4000 trucks a week I think it is important to keep the fleet sales at 100 trucks or less. If they can Mass produce more than that I would be one of the first to help them with their commercial fleet sales but I also believe in being able to help the smaller businesses get there trucks at the same time and not have to wait in behind for larger orders. So let's shoot for the Moon and Mars, then we will end up amongst the Stars!!
They should launch balloons with cameras that drift and film while checking weather.
👍
Yep when yer in nars, look behind you, thhars a mars ranger.
This channel is always the ONLY ones with this type of single piece of news. You will not hear about this on any other news sites or channels. So either their really good and privy to many things because they’re wee ly I’ll tthr game of network
Amino acids are required for most carbon based life that we know of, but not all life requires amino acids, Please don't use blank statements that are categorically false, We know of far more types of life than just carbon based...
And even within carbon based there's extremea-files, And if extremea-files don't break the rules enough for you, you gotta start keeping a mind viruses and fire & crystals, anytime you start trying to define life You have to see if it keeps viruses in and fire out, Because there's very few definitions that actually do that...
Anybody know about the tic toc ufo?
If that is real, is it worth using time and money on new drones to try to find life? Should they use money on something else to get more technologi?
The Tic Tac UFO's are actually plasma balls produced by synchronising two laser beams. These can be tracked by both radar and infrared cameras. The US Navy has been experimenting with this for years as a possible anti aircraft/missile weapon.
@@sidstevens9035 hmm, what about Bob Lazar who since the 80s has said that he worked with this and its not from here?
I’m all for shooting anything at asteroids. Rockets, bombs, Bruce Willis; whatever!
Why do they vent it ? I mean isn't that wasteful and expensive over time why not put a vacuum chamber around the circumference of the base an pump the vented gas to a container of some sort i am not an engineer so this is probably a stupid question..
Ok....it's Mars
Dust storms.
And wicked storms that make anything here on Earth look really mellow.
And don't forget the temperature.
So....is going mechanical the brightest idea ?????
You can't have dust storms in a virtual vacuum so someone is telling lies about the atmospheric pressure on Mars
We don’t need to dig. Just lend near new cradle
The core samples retain signatures which ferment over strata not detected on initial trials. The move to deliver more flying vehicles is the kind of team based vision that got us to the moon. Regular visits and predictable time measures are the arena of business model accuracy.
Asteroid mining will advance the process and the idea of finding life will fall away, in favor of monetary gain. Same old story. We came for signs of life and stayed for the dollar
Sign.
Hmm, 33, raptor engines heat and electric motors?
I still think a small blimp would have been better than a helicopter 🚁 for the Martian atmosphere IMO.
People arent even there yet and we are littering. Even the robots now too. Damn
cant they use the helicopters to blow dust off solar panels?
Why can't it be a joint endeavor,before the war starts🤔
hi
What's doesnt make sense is why itll take longer to get home rather then when it left to get there... they're stalling and at this rate by the time we get answers we will be in the same early stages all planets go through like states in this video, were going to be very sweaty and crispy running for our lives into space where its alot cooler
What does Congress know about it?
Think how much more they could do working together. Instead of a space race.
Life on Mars?? Where's David?
Contrary to near-universal belief: the atmospheric pressure in some of the deeper areas, like bottom of Valles Marineris and Hellas Basin is sufficient to support liquid water ON THE SURFACE between 0 and 10 Celcius (up to 50 degrees F). NASA/JPL and MSSS don't like to talk about it, but we already have pictures of EXTANT liquid water on the surface in ponds, lakes, and possibly a few streams. That's there now, not millions of years ago and then dried up. All good wishes.
How big and deep are the lakes?
And they are really salty right
Citation needed. It's pretty ridiculous to suggest that the space agencies would not want to talk about liquid water on Mars, the thing they are looking for. Your claims are sus. Peer reviewed evidence of extant surface LAKES or GTFO.
Why do you come here and just boldly lie about obviously wrong shit?
Edit: you edited your comment after I commented, and it's STILL glaringly incorrect. LMAO
It's "near universally" believed because people believe the math, practical observations and experiments more than some idiot on the internet claiming to be smarter than all of humanity.
I'm surprised those drones even work in Mars if that atmosphere is really as thin as they say. Or maybe we're getting BSed
2.7 billion? that is insane considering your chances of surviving the trip there is almost zero and same for living there.
THEIR IS ABSOLUTELY NO REASON IT SHOULD COST THAT MUCH!!!!! PERIOD!!!
Wait...we found water on Mars?
In the form of ice and proof that there was liquid water on mars in the past
Mars Sample Return. Funding is ramping up from about $250 million to about $650 million for NASA’s contribution to MSR, an international mission to retrieve samples currently being cached by the Mars Perseverance rover, and the administration is seeking $822 million for next year. NASA notes the mission’s total lifecycle cost is expected to increase substantially as it moves to a two-lander architecture for conveying the mission’s rover and an ascent vehicle to the surface of Mars. The agency recently concluded that a single lander capable of carrying both vehicles would depart too far from proven designs. The landers are expected to launch in 2028, two years later than when the single lander was supposed to launch, with the aim of returning samples to Earth in 2033. With this kind of budget increase, it is highly likely many high tech drones would be deployed on arrival to survey all targeted areas previously analysed and mapped, which are most likely to have had life. Exact details on how deeper core samples beyond surface radiation/sterilisation depths will be drilled with a two-lander architecture, appears to be protected information.
Never take anything from another planet to yours.
Imagine if this whole time we've been paranoid of an alien invasion, but we're gonna end up being the aliens invading and exterminating some primitive martians.
Y don’t they make them like a quad drone
The atmosphere is too thin on Mars and smaller blades would have to spin too fast. A larger blade can spin slower.
How does any of this benefit humanity apart from our curiosity?
In the best case scenario it will cause more questions that require billions more to be spent without solving any of our problems here on our home planet.
There is a saying and it goes “curiosity killed the cat”
You're missing the last part of "curiosity killed the cat....."
".....satisfaction brought it back"
...we cant stay on earth forever. The Sun will flare, volcanos erupt, asteroids hit, etc. Eventually, humanity needs to explore the cosmos and leave earth.
But while we are on earth, space investment provides us with a couple things.
1. Research and development which eventually make its way down to the consumer (think about Space x propulsion or energy storage).
2. Resources (asteroid mining and such)
@@jevvf3246 Resurrection?
Are The Klingon in Mars ??
It's against international treaties for governments to claim territory in space
Yes. And countries never back out of those things...
@@stevenswitzer5154 lol they do start wars over it however
Imagine they find life and its a virus... we all dead
85 million for that wow. Send a commercial drone along with these next time. You know as a experiment. Cha ching!!! Lol
What Ingenuity really proved was that our estimation of the atmospheric pressure on Mars was extremely underestimated.
Why? Was the atmospheric pressure of Mars not well measured?
@@Hansulf obviously not
@@sidstevens9035 So... Then our estimation of the atmospheric pressure of Mars was not underestimated...
@@Hansulf ???
No it was well underestimated obviously
@@sidstevens9035 Bro, your comment makes no sense. Do you know what the word underestimated means?
why oh why did they decide to throw all the little sample tubes all over the surface of mars to be found and gathered - why not just collect them all in a 'cargo hold' of the curiosity rover, and when it is full, it is programmed to pop them out all together in one spot (or better yet - direct transfer to another robot which is coming to fetch them back to earth).
like scattering them randomly all over seems the worst method, holding in a rover cargo bay and then deposited all in one place (avoiding an error-prone seek mission when they are scattered) seems the second best method, and the best method seems to hold them all in a rover cargo bay and direct transfer to a fetch-back to earth robot. 🤷
im sure the nasa engineers thought of all this. the most likely explanation is that the cargo hold would be too heavy, and impact rover battery performance, so they need to drop samples instead of retain them because of weight. but then there will have to be another robot that can carry all that weight later on when it gets picked up - is this actually the case? or is this just a tremendous lack of foresight that they have to go picking them up scattered all over the place (possibly burried by sand, and lost) instead of one place?
Yeah governments fund it but I think individuals should be taking over that now
Does NASA and the US government tell us everything they find? If they have already found complex life on a celestial body, would they tell us?
If anyone already knows it’s them.
Elon's Teslabots will be the first denizens of Mars. It'll be up to them to establish the underground colonies in advance of a human voyage there.