Introduction to quantum cryptography - Vadim Makarov
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- I introduce the basic principles of quantum cryptography, and discuss today's status of its technology, with examples of optical schemes and components. No prior knowledge of quantum mechanics is required :).
This first lecture is about the basics of quantum cryptography. Lectures 2 and 3 cover quantum hacking:
• Quantum hacking - Vadi...
• Quantum hacking - Vadi...
Presentation slides of the entire lecture course can be downloaded at:
Power Point (95 MiB, with videos and animations) - www.vad1.com/la...
PDF (14.8 MiB, static images only) - www.vad1.com/la...
Vadim Makarov is a research assistant professor at the Institute for Quantum Computing, heading the Quantum hacking lab - www.vad1.com/lab/
This course was part of a lecture series hosted by CryptoWorks21 in August 2014 in Waterloo, Canada.
Find out more about IQC!
Website - uwaterloo.ca/i...
Facebook - / quantumiqc
Twitter - / quantumiqc
cool t shirt
Ой, какой же русский акцент..
Не, мне-то наоборот всё понятно, но вот англоязычным, наверное, тяжело.
I need the class on how to build the equipment.
You and me both
Great explanation in the beginning
SLLLAYYYEERRRRRRRRR
Brilliant lecture, would love to see the second part!
Thanks
Really helpful for my semiconductor exam
I do appreciate
if Alice is not sharing the bit information with Bob but only the chosen basis for a particular number of photons, then how Bob concludes the retained bit sequence by itself? if you say that it is Universal for bit value 1 for horizontal and 0 for rest of the polarization then it is possible for Eve to masquerade like Alice!? Still, it is not clear that what information Alice share with bob after 1000 photon transmission in your example! -retained bit? again how Bob knows whether its retained bits are with the lowest 'error' rates?
How do Alice and Bob determine the secure key without Eve eavesdropping on their method for determining the secure key?
Very good information.
Much appreciated.
thanks
It seems to me you're trying to make it too complex. Take two identical dictionaries give every defined word a number than use a system with say! with 10,000 or 10,000,000 single individual digit. Give every number or word its own individual digit after that your options are almost endless.
Awesome.... sir.. thank you
Thanks
Hello, can any natural-English-speaker tell me, please, if this accent ok? Is it understandable/distractive? I think, as Russian, I have similar one..
I am not a native English speaker, But live in the UK for a very long time. It is totally understandable.
I've taken part in a few Makarov lectures - I find his accent a little difficult to follow, but it could certainly be far, FAR worse.
Looks like he speaks English much less than writes/reads. Nerd-cryptohacker, keke.
I'm a native, the accent is thick but it is very clear and understandable
This not broken chick legs.