NEW JETSURF GP100 AND 2017 YAMAHA SUPERJET!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 лис 2016
  • Instagram: / byronfoth
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 32

  • @danblanzara3174
    @danblanzara3174 11 місяців тому +2

    They should make one of these with a 250 thing would be fucking mental

  • @jasonsiig
    @jasonsiig 6 років тому +1

    Had a 2011 jet ski now have a jetsurf .I would never go back....

  • @brandonshowalter757
    @brandonshowalter757 7 років тому

    I am about to put a deposit down on the Pro. Would love to hear your opinion of the jetsurf. Is it worth 12k?

  • @KellyRicketts
    @KellyRicketts 3 роки тому +1

    Love the Powered wakeboard, take some skill and finesse, Take that over a jet ski, the Trike version of a Motorcycle. I have 4 gas powered jet Surfs and an Electric Lampuga. The lampuga is fast but you only get maybe 20 minutes ride time, and a couple hours to recharge!

  • @bitcoinbeast
    @bitcoinbeast 4 роки тому

    What a sweet lake, man made right?

  • @Jetsom
    @Jetsom 7 років тому +3

    Two awesome looking toys! Question: If you had to choose ONE, which would you go for?

    • @buickbusiness
      @buickbusiness  7 років тому +4

      The superjet, because it is really fast.

  • @restrepo88
    @restrepo88 6 років тому +4

    Question: I was wondering, where is the air intake for the engine located?
    Cheers

    • @womackke
      @womackke 3 роки тому

      the boot where the control cable goes into the board is the intake

  • @moz9794
    @moz9794 Рік тому

    Is this board on electric of benzine

  • @bradwhit381
    @bradwhit381 6 років тому

    How do you like the Jetsurf? How's the reliability?

    • @buickbusiness
      @buickbusiness  6 років тому

      Jet surf is a ball of fun. We havnt had any problems with it.

  • @tedschmitt178
    @tedschmitt178 7 років тому

    Looks like the Surf Jet is very tough to ride in even light chop.

    • @cheafy2758
      @cheafy2758 7 років тому +2

      TED Schmitt It's not since it's heavier it plows through waves

  • @royceroller7095
    @royceroller7095 6 років тому +3

    to expensive haven't seen anyone using in Florida

  • @adastra79
    @adastra79 7 років тому +1

    where was this filmed?

    • @buickbusiness
      @buickbusiness  7 років тому +1

      Сергей Журавлёв a private pond in Wisconsin

    • @adastra79
      @adastra79 7 років тому

      Byron Foth damn nice place, dude! Oh and the equipment rocks!

  • @jypsydog6079
    @jypsydog6079 7 років тому

    I WANA PLAY!!!

  • @supertrillo
    @supertrillo 7 років тому +10

    it seems to me that this must be extremely boring after using it for more than an hour

    • @sonictheedgehog5360
      @sonictheedgehog5360 6 років тому +3

      Jorge Merlevede for 15k yeah its not worth it

    • @S0RELOSER
      @S0RELOSER 6 років тому +2

      Looks way more fun than wake boarding tbh.

    • @JS-qg1ie
      @JS-qg1ie 6 років тому +2

      Jorge Merlevede So does sex after an hour but I still enjoy it the next time🤪

    • @cameraman1234567890
      @cameraman1234567890 3 роки тому

      Nah, it starts at 9,900 which is still pricey to me

  • @IROF76
    @IROF76 2 роки тому

    I 60 kmh col cazzo che li fa

  • @WesV
    @WesV 6 років тому +1

    Hmmm 100hp jetski or 3 horsepower wakeboard....

    • @johnlongdong2231
      @johnlongdong2231 5 років тому +1

      Wesley Vaughn Different riding experiences, gomer.

    • @cameraman1234567890
      @cameraman1234567890 3 роки тому

      The Wakeboard is actually about 20HP

    • @WesV
      @WesV 3 роки тому +1

      @@cameraman1234567890 according to whos number? their race model has a 100CC 2 stroke in it in a hard to breath space, they claim they are rated for close to 11kw....if power is what youre after you can do alot better for 20g.

    • @cameraman1234567890
      @cameraman1234567890 3 роки тому

      @@WesV Fully aware and Im not disagreeing, The reason why you pay so much is because its a top of the line brand and because its a completely different sport. MSR Engines is what makes it so expensive with all of the latest technology as well. Another thing to note is that your analogy of Horsepower is inadequate. 20 Horsepower on a smaller vessel is a different scale of performance numbers since there is far less weight and mass. Since there is far less weight and mass, less energy is needed to achieve 30+ Mph. Then you look at a Jet ski that is 500 lbs and obviously has more room, a bit better of breathing room, and has the room to fit a supercharger/forced induction method. So obviously the ski will be faster and such. Dont even get me started on trailer hassles and such. I personally almost feel an electric board is more practical in terms of cost and raw performance, but unfortunately is alot of energy to recharge.

    • @WesV
      @WesV 3 роки тому

      @@cameraman1234567890 im well aware of power to weight ratio, the real numbers come from the volume of water going through the nozzle. Havent done the math but ib be willing to bet that the ski puts the power down WAY better.