Real Lawyer Reacts to The Social Network (Full Movie) // LegalEagle

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,9 тис.

  • @robpolaris7272
    @robpolaris7272 6 років тому +3176

    One of the best quotes from this movie. "You can't win in a deposition, but you can lose."

    • @shailygupta5849
      @shailygupta5849 4 роки тому +15

      He said it was from a movie not this movie

    • @nateds7326
      @nateds7326 4 роки тому +21

      @@shailygupta5849 ok which movie

    • @gheller2261
      @gheller2261 3 роки тому +32

      That's very similar to what I tell my clients, which is "nothing can be gained by your deposition." I signal to them that the less they say, the better. Answer the question asked and keep it short.

    • @Keyblade21
      @Keyblade21 2 роки тому

      Yea

    • @MickeyMouse-lm6zj
      @MickeyMouse-lm6zj Рік тому +4

      in the end, the brothers got paid and then invested the money and became billionaires, so by being smart the lawsuit turned out extremely well for them

  • @Matrim42
    @Matrim42 6 років тому +8855

    Zuckerberg: I’m not a bad guy.
    Narrator: He was.

    • @n00n50
      @n00n50 6 років тому +273

      now the story of a wealthy family who lost everything

    • @DJL396
      @DJL396 5 років тому +238

      For a second there I almost convince myself that Zuckerberg was played by Michael Cera.

    • @ChaosTheory9
      @ChaosTheory9 5 років тому +50

      n00n and one lawyer that had to make sense of all this nonsense...this is the Social Network

    • @brennenbjorgan5748
      @brennenbjorgan5748 5 років тому +17

      Matrim42 except how he bought that guys stocks illegally

    • @smokeymayrand4757
      @smokeymayrand4757 5 років тому +2

      Really ?

  • @jakeevara
    @jakeevara 4 роки тому +5359

    Lawyer: Let's break for lunch
    LeagleEagle: That's EXACTLY what a lawyer would say!

    • @armstrongtixid6873
      @armstrongtixid6873 3 роки тому +9

      969 likes ... nice almost at 1K.

    • @morganruiz7097
      @morganruiz7097 3 роки тому +10

      It is 999 likes for me rn but I’m not gonna like

    • @armstrongtixid6873
      @armstrongtixid6873 3 роки тому +4

      @@morganruiz7097 lol I liked it, when it was on 999

    • @armstrongtixid6873
      @armstrongtixid6873 3 роки тому +5

      @@morganruiz7097 And now I've unliked lol because why not ... I was technically the 1000th like, but I just retracted it.

    • @PrettyGuardian
      @PrettyGuardian 3 роки тому +11

      A+ for legal realism.

  • @mespn520
    @mespn520 5 років тому +8653

    I like to believe you're not actually wearing any pants in these videos, just a suit jacket and shirt and tie.

    • @MrFlik55
      @MrFlik55 5 років тому +171

      HAHAHAHA that would be really funny if true

    • @moonymonster
      @moonymonster 5 років тому +184

      We'll never prove he doesn't, so...

    • @alburomarkjoseph
      @alburomarkjoseph 5 років тому +55

      That always happen to my friend.. he's an online teacher.... hahahahaha.....

    • @Meep_Sheep
      @Meep_Sheep 5 років тому +167

      Objection! This is speculation.

    • @jobkramer560
      @jobkramer560 5 років тому +56

      @@Meep_Sheep the other side has not given any evidence in the first place. Contradicting or otherwise.

  • @larafaceroli_
    @larafaceroli_ 4 роки тому +3510

    just as an aside, the “movie star” is natalie portman who was actually attending harvard at the time.

    • @StevExMachina
      @StevExMachina 4 роки тому +148

      Holy SH1T. Thanks for not making me go to google 😅

    • @iainronald4217
      @iainronald4217 4 роки тому +214

      I also remember reading that she gave David Fincher a guided tour of the campus so he could get a feel for "Harvard Life" in the pre-production phase.

    • @formulahank1250
      @formulahank1250 4 роки тому +107

      I always assumed it was a reference to Matt Damon's time there, but Natalie Portman was a student at the time so I guess that makes more sense

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 4 роки тому +40

      Henry Campbell youre 17 years off.
      Only 17 years. You almost had it. Almost.

    • @MrBraddles3128
      @MrBraddles3128 4 роки тому +21

      Damn, Natalie Portman got into Harvard?

  • @ryanm.191
    @ryanm.191 6 років тому +3988

    My fav line in this movie is where one of the twins says
    “I’m 6ft 5, 220 and there’s two of me”

    • @xanon4210
      @xanon4210 5 років тому +50

      I'm pretty sure Ty said it.

    • @Belofsky1
      @Belofsky1 5 років тому +51

      Cringey

    • @jamesd7678
      @jamesd7678 5 років тому +405

      VoltGe it’s well written. They’re supposed to sound like rich stuck up Harvard boys with good genes. It makes sense

    • @zappawench6048
      @zappawench6048 5 років тому +9

      @@DeuPKay Well said!

    • @sable.11
      @sable.11 5 років тому +3

      Very cool also mine

  • @Redbaron_Gaming
    @Redbaron_Gaming 6 років тому +3712

    I enjoy this format.
    A real professional talking about his field in a non-condescending manor to my semi understanding brain.
    Good job, sir.

    • @vicmartone
      @vicmartone 5 років тому +78

      Manner, not manor :)

    • @jacob8565
      @jacob8565 5 років тому +18

      You might like Dr Hopes Sick notes

    • @ayyylmao101
      @ayyylmao101 5 років тому +17

      @@jacob8565
      YES, omg. You can tell he loves to teach and learn about the field he is so passionate about (said field being medicine, of course.)

    • @gawkyadroit5869
      @gawkyadroit5869 5 років тому +7

      You should try Dr Mike

    • @Beegrene
      @Beegrene 5 років тому +23

      @@vicmartone He might be in a manor. You don't know where his office is.

  • @sebiieex
    @sebiieex 3 роки тому +2452

    so sad the scene of “.03%” wasn’t included. such a hard hitting scene.

    • @quanicle101
      @quanicle101 3 роки тому +363

      SORRY MY PRADA’S AT THE CLEANERS
      garfield is so good

    • @thatfilmydesaikid
      @thatfilmydesaikid 3 роки тому +82

      I think he excluded that coz of what he said about the whole Saverin part of the deposition: It didn't make sense.
      In retrospect, I also think the company shares % part was revealed for the audience to empathize (or sympathize) with Garfield's version of Saverin (in truth he got the boot from FB for a very different reason) since The Social Network is told through four distinct perspectives - Zuckerberg, Saverin, Winklevoss twins & Divya (as co-storytellers), and Parker - and Saverin seemed the most sympathetic character to write.

    • @sebiieex
      @sebiieex 3 роки тому +21

      @@thatfilmydesaikid i mean i understand why he didn’t put it but still i enjoy that scene and kinda wanted to see his reaction.

    • @Mister_Mag00
      @Mister_Mag00 3 роки тому +46

      @@thatfilmydesaikid "in truth he got the boot from FB for a very different reason" you literally have zero evidence to back that up, you sound like a zucker fanboy

    • @lonelyone69
      @lonelyone69 2 роки тому

      @@thatfilmydesaikid What Zuckerberg did was a complete violation of SEC law as saverin was not informed of the 7 times that his shares were diluted. Zuckerberg created the Delaware corporation on his own and then diluted saverins shares down after the old company was bought over.

  • @queson52
    @queson52 3 роки тому +632

    "Not uncommon to have the entire room packed with attorneys" Gotta get those billable hours in.

  • @figboot
    @figboot 5 років тому +2531

    The Courier New font family could be used because that is one of the only fixed-width fonts. This means that every character is just as wide as the others.
    Take these lines from example:
    "iiiiiiiiii"
    "WWWWWWWWWW"
    These lines appear different lengths although they are both ten characters long.
    This property of a font family can make it quite easy to make tables / charts with solely text.

    • @jordansullivan5764
      @jordansullivan5764 5 років тому +51

      Thank you! That is fascinating! :D

    • @figboot
      @figboot 5 років тому +62

      It could also be because typewriters typically used a font that looked like that

    • @johnrinck617
      @johnrinck617 5 років тому +150

      Yes. Mechanical typewriters (and probably electric ones) placed the letters one at a time, moving a fixed distance between them. This is still used in TV, stage, and movie scripts to make it easier to estimate the run-time of a scene at a glance. Maybe the stenographers use that font for a similar reason?

    • @AlexAyoub_
      @AlexAyoub_ 5 років тому +65

      I came here to say precisely this. As a research scientist, we also use this in sequence alignments when looking at conservation amongst different organisms to see precisely if and where deviations occur in both their coding sequence and translated protein sequence.

    • @Rohaq
      @Rohaq 5 років тому +92

      It's not just its monospaced nature, it's also because each character looks distinct: There's little issue determining the different between uppercase "i"s and lowercase "L"s, or the number 1, for example.

  • @jamesmcmichael6127
    @jamesmcmichael6127 6 років тому +732

    The legal stuff is interesting and all but the true brilliance of this channel is the pure love and passion for the law

    • @JaelinBezel
      @JaelinBezel 5 років тому +6

      Rico: "LLLLAAAAAAAAAUUWWWWWW!!!!"

    • @Logan912
      @Logan912 2 роки тому

      @@JaelinBezel I am… the luh!

  • @justinz9225
    @justinz9225 6 років тому +1468

    FINALLY I HAVE SOME KNOWLEDGE TO OFFER THIS CHANNEL!!!
    Courier is used in screenplays (and probably courts) because the letters are all equidistant from one another, contrary to most other fonts which have a varied width depending on the letter (consider "l" versus "m"). Because of that, it's very easy to estimate the length of a transcript by evaluating how many pages there are. One page of screenplay is about one minute of screen time. I suspect it's something similar here. You can very easily estimate the number of characters per page of transcript because the font is uniform. Unfortunately, this also makes it slightly harder to read, as you pointed out, because there are bizarre gaps between letters that don't usually exist.

    • @JayJonahJaymeson
      @JayJonahJaymeson 6 років тому +82

      The font was designed to resemble that of a typewriter, so I assume stenographers just kept using it so their records remained fairly consistent.

    • @raimarulightning
      @raimarulightning 6 років тому +5

      Yes!!!

    • @Mr_Beaubles
      @Mr_Beaubles 6 років тому +22

      Came here to say this. Up voted your correct answer instead.

    • @justinz9225
      @justinz9225 6 років тому +65

      @@JayJonahJaymeson It does resemble a typewriter font, however the reasoning behind its use is that the columns will always be uniform due to the equal width of each letter, which gives a page of text a predictable length.

    • @GamesFromSpace
      @GamesFromSpace 6 років тому +82

      It's called a monospace font, programmers always use a font which has that quality.

  • @OwenMorganTelltale
    @OwenMorganTelltale 3 роки тому +1576

    a big reason for why courier is so common is because all the letters are exactly evenly spaced from each other. programmers use this font sometimes too, for that reason

    • @EnterJustice
      @EnterJustice 3 роки тому +131

      It's called a monospaced font and, yes, programmers usually use them when writing code because it makes everything line up nicely.

    • @nikhilsanka172
      @nikhilsanka172 3 роки тому +15

      I love your channel man.

    • @GlitchClaw
      @GlitchClaw 3 роки тому +49

      I'm a programmer and I can say most important thing is the indention and when using a monospace font, lines align perfectly. There are many amazing monospace fonts but I've never seen a programmer code in a normal font (not monospace).

    • @aminuteinlife9503
      @aminuteinlife9503 3 роки тому +9

      Well, you are someone I didn't expect here😅

    • @ajalanbrown2200
      @ajalanbrown2200 3 роки тому +10

      I’m a programmer and could care less what the font is the indentation is the important part

  • @russellward4624
    @russellward4624 5 років тому +577

    The lawyer missed a trick with the "I'm sure that's the first time someones lied under oath" to respond "Is that from personal knowledge?"

    • @GriffinPilgrim
      @GriffinPilgrim 4 роки тому +82

      I dunno, that might have come across as bullying. I mean the statement taken literally would be naive and taken in it's obviously sarcastic tone would be common knowledge. Implying that saying that was because he was lying under oath would be implying someone is a criminal because they knew a crime exists. I know murders happen, suggesting I am a murderer because of that would be absurd.

    • @Jartran72
      @Jartran72 4 роки тому +8

      @@GriffinPilgrim Who did you murder? I know what trust is so you can trust me with your secrets :)

    • @GriffinPilgrim
      @GriffinPilgrim 4 роки тому +3

      @@Jartran72 But if you know what my secrets are they will no longer be secrets but you'll still know what secrets are even though they aren't...I'm sorry, I think I just created a hole in reality via paradox.

    • @omarsaletovicprins9632
      @omarsaletovicprins9632 2 роки тому +3

      he chose his words pretty well, “guess” and “first time” implying he doesnt know about lying under oath and that its his guess

    • @GriffinPilgrim
      @GriffinPilgrim Рік тому +2

      @Zoomer My point exactly; his position is weak and it would only have improved his situation if she had attempted a weak insinuation.

  • @pranavharikrishnan9840
    @pranavharikrishnan9840 3 роки тому +319

    Another possible reason as to why this movie is really accurate is that both of Aaron Sorkin’s siblings are lawyers and that he has shot a lot of legal dramas. His sister was the person that advised him to write the script for his first movie A few good men

    • @saintlynnie4037
      @saintlynnie4037 3 роки тому +5

      Wasn't he also heavily involved with the series The West Wing? I loved that show, even though there was a hell of a lot of talking and waking going on. Lol

    • @matityaloran9157
      @matityaloran9157 3 роки тому +4

      @Saint Lenny, Sorkin created The West Wing

    • @tonic316
      @tonic316 2 роки тому +4

      he also has a particular style of writing. basically making the characters say stories that circle back to the point they are trying to prove

    • @kid-ava
      @kid-ava Рік тому

      interesting that he comes from a family of lawyers, I never knew that!

  • @joshua4875
    @joshua4875 6 років тому +2956

    Thank God, something to distract me from my homework.

    • @ChancellorScar
      @ChancellorScar 6 років тому +88

      Instead of being distracted by Facebook, you were instead distracted by a pleasant reaction video of a deposition of... Facebook.

    • @tricksterhuaun
      @tricksterhuaun 6 років тому +65

      If you're studying law you can excuse this as research.

    • @MrNikolidas
      @MrNikolidas 6 років тому +19

      @@tricksterhuaun This is my excuse.

    • @joeburgess2464
      @joeburgess2464 6 років тому +7

      Zuckerberg is a lizard we all know it.

    • @joshua4875
      @joshua4875 6 років тому +5

      @@tricksterhuaun unfortunately not. I'm a nursing student

  • @JMulvy
    @JMulvy 6 років тому +827

    YES! MY useless education in graphic design finally pays off! Courier font is a monospaced font, which means that all characters have the same width, it is more practical in documents which contain aligned columns of text so they can all be legible across various platforms and mediums. There are several other more useful monospace fonts available but a trend has already been set.

    • @omegachaos32
      @omegachaos32 6 років тому +27

      I love that there are 3 comments in a row about this exact thing! Thanks for your added clarification of this issue.

    • @Waishwhw72i19sjx7
      @Waishwhw72i19sjx7 6 років тому +10

      I fell asleep half way through your comment.

    • @JMulvy
      @JMulvy 6 років тому +27

      TLDR makes me weep for future generations.

    • @thatunnamedredshirt
      @thatunnamedredshirt 6 років тому +6

      Courier is an elegant tool used for crafting formal documents. Courier New is trash I wouldn't wish upon my worst enemy.

    • @writershard5065
      @writershard5065 6 років тому +2

      .... are we seriously going apeshift over a minor difference in fonts.

  • @wjhull
    @wjhull 6 років тому +196

    Just some quick support: I used to work in publishing, and courier was often used in transcripts because (A) it's serif, which means there are no 'I/l' errors in reading, and each character has a fixed width (IE if you have a row of Is and a row of Ms, they will fill with the same number of characters), which means that the length of the transcript can be more accurately gauged by the page count. Courier was based off of typewriters, which shunted the roller forward with every key press and so each letter had to take up the same amount of space, which is why it's unique--most fonts you see have variable width, so narrow letters will look more 'smashed-together' and can mess with your page-based word count.The fixed width also makes it much more 'neat' if you're manually justifying, which is handy for formatting screenplays or drawing little pictures or patterns with the letters (like Jack Torrance's manuscript in Kubrick's The Shining).
    For stenographers, I imagine page count isn't that important, but I imagine from the clip that formatting is important, and at-glance readability is far more important than aesthetics.

    • @borismuller86
      @borismuller86 6 років тому +5

      William Hull it’s monospaced.

    • @wjhull
      @wjhull 6 років тому +5

      @@borismuller86 Right! That's the word. I only recall like half of the typography terms I probably ought to know.

    • @o00nemesis00o
      @o00nemesis00o 6 років тому +2

      There are lots of monospaced fonts more legible than Courier tbh...

    • @Polikaize
      @Polikaize 5 років тому +2

      i guess, for a stenographer using the font that allows for more accurate page length is important for the same exact reason it's important in screenwriting - there they actually use page length to count out the approx. screentime (and by approx. i mean down to some 5 minutes, so YEAH).
      You can imagine, time is a big deal in movie making. It may as well be so in court procedures?
      upd: It's actually down to a minute (or at least it is in screenwriting, not sure about court transcripts).

  • @timothyrenuart1067
    @timothyrenuart1067 5 років тому +360

    OBJECTION:
    This man’s tie is FAR too fabulous.

  • @abc68130
    @abc68130 5 років тому +780

    Objection! Despite always complaining about Judges not ruling on objections, I almost never see you actually rule on objections in the comments.

    • @PompeySomerstown
      @PompeySomerstown 5 років тому +31

      I take it that means the objection is not overruled.....!

    • @SenjynAhkci
      @SenjynAhkci 5 років тому +3

      What up cadaver?! Vish objection!!!

    • @TerrorBlades
      @TerrorBlades 5 років тому +30

      He sticks around for 1 hour after publishing the video and does that.

    • @ProbLemChiLd1983
      @ProbLemChiLd1983 Місяць тому

      You need to tag a channel owner, there's thousands of comments usually, PLUS REPLIES to those comments, so in future you should say: "Objection @LegalEagle ..."

  • @Devedrus
    @Devedrus 6 років тому +548

    Objection! No one actually leaves their comments in the form of an objection, therefore they should all be invalid!

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  6 років тому +291

      Sustained.

    • @88michaelandersen
      @88michaelandersen 6 років тому +8

      I used to try to keep mine in the form of an objection.

    • @Dreaded88
      @Dreaded88 6 років тому +12

      *Objection!*
      I've left plenty of objection-styled comments on various *LegalEagle* videos!

    • @swampwitch6133
      @swampwitch6133 6 років тому +8

      Objection! Argumentative!!

    • @AdamJames15
      @AdamJames15 6 років тому +3

      I prefer to leave my comments in the form of an amicus brief.

  • @freebiehughes9615
    @freebiehughes9615 4 роки тому +114

    That scene where Zuckerberg talks to the second year associate at the end is my favorite! "It doesn't matter. I asked the question, now they're thinking about it." Pure gold!

  • @thatdirtyninja5829
    @thatdirtyninja5829 5 років тому +534

    man being a lawyer worth any salt has to be taxing on sanity, i give proper lawyers credit for putting up with all the crap

    • @rammsteinrulz16
      @rammsteinrulz16 5 років тому +24

      100%. Take a look into family law, see how long you would last XD

    • @swine13
      @swine13 4 роки тому +6

      Its like that for a lot of the top jobs. Being a surgeon cant be easy when youre on hour 16 of an operation, you really need to take a whizz and you've just realised that one of the clamps you had on isn't accounted for.
      Or how about the person in charge of the McFlurry machine at McDonald's?
      That's a pretty... high-octane environment. No room for error with those Oreo crumbs! Plus you gotta turn it off for a few hours each night to wash it and then what if someone orders a mcflurry then? Well you're stuffed then, aren't you?
      So not everyone has an easy time of it at work...

    • @reservoirfrogs2177
      @reservoirfrogs2177 4 роки тому +25

      @@swine13 the person stuck at McDonald's likely goes through worse hardships outside of work than the doctor or lawyer

    • @Tofu_va_Bien
      @Tofu_va_Bien 4 роки тому +9

      @@swine13 At least doctors and lawyers don't get treated like the dirt under somebody's boot for the abhorrent crime of... hmm let me see here... being poor. Of course! Lazy, filthy, poor people am I right? Oh you can't afford to college so you have to work in the service industry? Lol, your fault, should have gone to med school loser.
      Please, you sound like Mr. Burns dude. Give it a rest.

    • @systemsoversymptomsvisionw9806
      @systemsoversymptomsvisionw9806 4 роки тому +3

      @@rammsteinrulz16 i'd rather be the fry guy at McDonald's than practice family law. ANY practice area is trying as a lawyer, but Family Law has to be the worst...

  • @martinafurlan8340
    @martinafurlan8340 3 роки тому +61

    David Fincher said in his dvd commentary that the actress who plays Gretchen (Eduardo's lawyer) is an actual lawyer who also picked up acting!

  • @kaneviktorovich99
    @kaneviktorovich99 2 роки тому +31

    Growing up both of my parents were lawyers, my dad still is (my mom is a judge now) and yet I’ve never learned and actually understood so much about our US legal system than I have from watching your videos.

    • @denverarnold6210
      @denverarnold6210 2 роки тому +2

      I'd say that's a matter of if they are trying to teach, and how well jargon is broken down into layman terms, both of which he seems to do well.

  • @noxure
    @noxure 6 років тому +525

    Courier is monospaced and every symbol is clearly distinct from other. So There can be no confusion between I and l or 0 and O. That also makes it the best font to digitize a physical page with OCR software accurately and map the coordinates in the text.

    • @sdstorm
      @sdstorm 5 років тому +9

      Actually, lowercase L and 1 are very similar in Courier New font.

    • @BugsHaveProtein
      @BugsHaveProtein 5 років тому +11

      The monospacing is typically the most important part in the screenwriting side at least, as it allows the average translation of a page of dialogue to a minute of film.

    • @itsmealex8959
      @itsmealex8959 5 років тому

      Is that i and L or L and i.

    • @ScottMStolz
      @ScottMStolz 5 років тому +4

      The original Courier font is more distinct than Courier New. In Courier New, the 1 and l are indeed different, but are very similar, whereas, in the original Courier font, the difference between 1 and l and I is very obvious.

    • @vsync
      @vsync 5 років тому

      '0' isn't slashed in Courier....

  • @V_4_Versace
    @V_4_Versace 6 років тому +167

    Objection! I very randomly saw you at Howard Law today and fangirled endlessly but no one outside of law school understood my joy

    • @symbiotegod2069
      @symbiotegod2069 5 років тому +19

      Overruled! That has nothing to do with this video.

    • @MasterChiefSamus
      @MasterChiefSamus 5 років тому +9

      @@symbiotegod2069 You mean Overruled: Irrelevant.

    • @symbiotegod2069
      @symbiotegod2069 5 років тому +2

      @@MasterChiefSamus same thing

    • @indigowendigo8165
      @indigowendigo8165 5 років тому +6

      Hey, let the fan girl have her fun. :p

    • @symbiotegod2069
      @symbiotegod2069 5 років тому +4

      @@indigowendigo8165 Overruled! What she has mentioned is completely irrelevant to the topic within the video. As is your response to defend her action. I'll let you both off with a warning. But if either of you go off the subject at hand again. I will place you both in contempt of court.

  • @jamesfleming1155
    @jamesfleming1155 6 років тому +194

    That tie is so dope

  • @CarlosRodriguez-et8it
    @CarlosRodriguez-et8it 5 років тому +581

    Hey man, I would like to see you review The People v O.J Simpson: American Crime story show.

    • @miamiamia1000
      @miamiamia1000 5 років тому +7

      Yes!

    • @mediaproductionpro
      @mediaproductionpro 4 роки тому +6

      Agreed

    • @BlueGeen
      @BlueGeen 4 роки тому +4

      Omg YES.

    • @irislou964
      @irislou964 3 роки тому +4

      ooooh that’s a good one

    • @Mister100Percent
      @Mister100Percent 3 роки тому +9

      It might be touchy to some, but you gotta admit that the entire case is fascinating as hell to look at. Couldn’t write the amount of shit that went on during that entire thing.

  • @JustinR316
    @JustinR316 4 роки тому +44

    13:34 the movie star is Natalie Portman. She was interviewed by the author of the book that inspired the film. She was a senior on campus when Facebook was founded

  • @Bellidentical
    @Bellidentical 6 років тому +646

    So some other suggestions
    -Legal Eagle Plays Ace Attorney
    - Trial scenes from the British series "Broadchurch"
    -The trial from the Bee movie.
    -The movie "Legal Eagles"

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  6 років тому +182

      I can't see David Tenant as anything other than the 10th Doctor.

    • @Bellidentical
      @Bellidentical 6 років тому +34

      @LegalEagle
      While I really want you to review Broadchurch, I could not think of a better response. Also his name has two Ns

    • @dandelyon1830
      @dandelyon1830 6 років тому +1

      LegalEagle Amen

    • @justincaviness
      @justincaviness 6 років тому +2

      Jesse Schoedel He's also in the new Rooster Teeth show gen:LOCK.

    • @dark_knight109
      @dark_knight109 6 років тому +11

      He did review the first case of Ace Attorney - it was the anime version, but it's basically the same as the game.

  • @Hero323
    @Hero323 6 років тому +565

    Objection! Your ad transitions are too smooth for UA-cam.

  • @TheDantheman12121
    @TheDantheman12121 6 років тому +101

    OBJECTION!!!!!! I do not believe you have legs!!

    • @mrerri2363
      @mrerri2363 5 років тому +2

      Ambrose lmfao, maybe he doesn’t wear pants...

  • @TheDayDreamingOwl
    @TheDayDreamingOwl 3 роки тому +74

    For anyone wondering, im fairly certain the "movie star" referred to in the deposition by the twins is Natalie Portman. She attended Harvard at the time.

    • @SlyScribeV
      @SlyScribeV 3 роки тому +5

      She actually was that very movie star!

    • @sarahhopper8891
      @sarahhopper8891 4 місяці тому

      I’m fairly certain that the reason why the question went unanswered in the film was so the audience would go “duh”.

    • @TheDayDreamingOwl
      @TheDayDreamingOwl 4 місяці тому

      @@sarahhopper8891 Well, Natalie Portmans alumni wasn't common knowledge for me, so I looked it looked up lol

  • @vyvansified
    @vyvansified 3 роки тому +93

    “This is one of the most accurate legal dramas I’ve ever seen in my entire life”
    “I give it an A-“
    how does one get a perfect score

    • @gabrielherman8930
      @gabrielherman8930 3 роки тому +7

      The bar was pretty low

    • @ValerieJNorse
      @ValerieJNorse 3 роки тому +9

      Ryan Sperling -- Check out his review of "The Rainmaker," which he gave an A+.

    • @randomguy6679
      @randomguy6679 2 роки тому +4

      By being My Cousin Vinny

  • @CAndIGaming1
    @CAndIGaming1 6 років тому +344

    You should cover the deposition on The Office between Jan and Dunder Mifflin Inc!

    • @LegalEagle
      @LegalEagle  6 років тому +58

      What episode is that?

    • @higginsandrew11
      @higginsandrew11 6 років тому +45

      @@LegalEagle season 4 episode 12

    • @vincent6845
      @vincent6845 6 років тому +52

      @@higginsandrew11 I don't think Mr legal eagle is prepared for such advanced and complex cases!

    • @adventureking5369
      @adventureking5369 6 років тому +25

      @@vincent6845 thats what she said

    • @Zinx10
      @Zinx10 6 років тому +12

      @@higginsandrew11 Netflix says it's Season 4 Episode 8 titled "The Deposition"

  • @garenw10
    @garenw10 5 років тому +80

    There was this one scene later on where Eduardo finds out his shares were diluted to almost nothing and he confronts Mark about it. He also tells him to lawyer up because he’s coming back to take over the company. I was wondering how much of that would be possible legally.

    • @retronymph
      @retronymph Рік тому +4

      Well, the deposition that we see is a result of that lawsuit, and as Rashida Jones' character indicates, if the suit had gone to trial, Zuck could have lost and yes, Eduardo could have basically gotten the whole company. Obviously, Eduardo was perfectly happy to just take an unknown settlement but he could have declined and taken it to trial if he wanted, but at a certain point it's just not worth the risk for either side

    • @Dctctx
      @Dctctx Рік тому

      None of it

  • @laurene988
    @laurene988 6 років тому +75

    Random person : Legal eagle won't ever do a legally blonde or bee movie video
    Me: OBJECTION!

  • @Freyrin
    @Freyrin 5 років тому +81

    I think I’m most disappointed that you didn’t review and comment on the actions that zuckerberg’s lawyers took to screw Ed out of his shares. And how he thought they were his lawyers too; I’d be really interested to see what an attorney thinks of what they did

    • @msl1689
      @msl1689 Рік тому +4

      Clearly unethical.

  • @asianfoodface
    @asianfoodface 5 років тому +97

    I'd be very interested in hearing your take on the legal ramifications of the Theranos and Elizabeth Holmes fraud scandal. How would you approach this case if you were the defense and what potential consequences could there be for all the board members involved with the company?

  • @taliorion917
    @taliorion917 6 років тому +32

    The reason that courier is often used is because it is a public domain font due to it never being trademarked by its creator, IBM. It is monospaced and installed on virtually every operating system, so when GUI's were not as common on computers it was important to have usable font. This made it very useful in the past, but today it is still used because nobody can seem to be bothered to change to a more modern font.

    • @rtg5881
      @rtg5881 6 років тому +2

      I dont think you can trademark fonts. I mean you can, youcan trademark anything, but it being enforcable is another question. The only placewhere such a thing would be enforcable is if the font is used in someones company logo and even then only if that logo can be confused for the trademark holders logo. Trademarks exist to do one thing and one thing only, prevent customers from confusing two products.
      And if i trademark a name for a handcreme you can still use that name for anything unrelated to beauty products.

    • @button9
      @button9 6 років тому +1

      TaliOrion I think the biggest reason it’s used is the monospacing and has a serif. Most modern monospaced fonts now are all sans serif, but serif is said to still be (debatable) easier to read. But yeah, a mix of tradition, cross platform, serif and monospace.

    • @ScottLongwellR
      @ScottLongwellR 6 років тому +3

      @@rtg5881 He meant copyrighted. Most fonts are copyrighted by their creators.

    • @rtg5881
      @rtg5881 6 років тому

      ​@@ScottLongwellR
      Hm.Got to say it is a bit surprising that the average font would rise to the creative level of being copyrighted (but thats different from place to place, for instance, while germany is not as puritanical as the US german courts dont typicly recognise a copyright for porn) - if theyare, by the way, you dont have "to copyright" it. It is protected with creation, you can file a copyright for the record but all thats for is so you can easier proof that you are indeed the creator.

    • @ScottLongwellR
      @ScottLongwellR 6 років тому +1

      @@rtg5881 There are three main ways to protect a typeface:
      1. Trademark;
      2. Copyright;
      3. Patent;
      In the U.S., typefaces (the design of the letters) don't receive copyright protection, although they do in most other countries.
      However, in the US, fonts can be copyrighted as computer files or programs that tell your computer how to display or print the typeface.
      IBM invented the Courier typeface and protected it with a design patent and a invention patent (for the means of producing it.)
      Howerever, *they neglected to trademark the name of the typeface* and so once the design patent expired other people could sell Courier typefaces and call what they were selling "Courier" typefaces.
      This means that a regulation or policy can specify "Courier" typeface and not be locked into a particular vendor for that typeface -- since "Courier" is not a trademarked name and it has passed into general usage like the term "Escalator".
      -----------------------------
      You're right that under current law copyright attaches upon creation. But if you don't register your copyright within three month of creating the work of art then (under US federal law) people are (legally) free to use your work without having to pay you damages.
      The best you can do is register the copyright and then get an injunction against future use and sue for damages (and attorney fees) that accrue after the date you registered the copyright.

  • @edbehn3617
    @edbehn3617 6 років тому +83

    Objection: There is a Supreme Court case that pertains to addressing a person by their first name. In Hamilton v. Alabama, the court ruled that a African-American witness is entitled to be address using a honorific (Miss/Mrs./Mr.) if white witnesses are.

    • @chrisjung7139
      @chrisjung7139 6 років тому +21

      Agreed but when they request their client be called mr. But refer to zukerberg as mark. Kind of negates the request as being " fair".

    • @davidpuckett3079
      @davidpuckett3079 6 років тому

      Coming from the legal eagal law firm : we'll allow it

  • @pyrotheevilplatypus
    @pyrotheevilplatypus 6 років тому +187

    How about the American Crime Story series The People vs. OJ Simpson? I imagine it's EXTREMELY accurate, but I'd still like your critique.

    • @sanna9062
      @sanna9062 6 років тому +1

      This is a great idea!

    • @fabianmorales2280
      @fabianmorales2280 6 років тому

      If you look at the real footage of the trial the show is a 100% recreation of them with tiny dramatic liberties in things like voice tones and such.

    • @ukaszdomagaa8998
      @ukaszdomagaa8998 6 років тому

      "the glove didn't fit" :D

  • @Sandwich_Bites
    @Sandwich_Bites 3 роки тому +31

    In film school we learned that currier is used because every letter takes up the same amount of space on the page, meaning that every page contains the same number of characters. They've clocked it and each page equals 1 minute of screen time so if you have a 90 page script it will be a 90 minute movie.

  • @HagSIN
    @HagSIN 5 років тому +484

    OBJECTION: Do the Office episode with the deposition for Jan's firing. Thanks. You rock!

    • @jayabhandari8428
      @jayabhandari8428 5 років тому +12

      I thought of the exact same thing when I was watching this!! Glad someone else thinks this too haha :D

    •  5 років тому +8

      You two should get married

    • @jarjar4095
      @jarjar4095 5 років тому +7

      You three should get married

    • @TheDiceMan360
      @TheDiceMan360 4 роки тому +6

      You four should get married

    • @anomaloustick4471
      @anomaloustick4471 4 роки тому +5

      You five should get married

  • @Eli-yn9bp
    @Eli-yn9bp 6 років тому +180

    I would love for you to analyze the To Kill a Mockingbird trial!

  • @thesparrow1116
    @thesparrow1116 5 років тому +31

    Lawyers and Coders can collide together in celebration of how accurate this movie portrays their work!

    • @supersani21
      @supersani21 2 роки тому

      Businessmen and businesswomen too thanks to the whole Eduardo fiasco

  • @legendsneverdye8949
    @legendsneverdye8949 6 років тому +36

    I watched the "what is a photocopier" video and completely recommend it. It made me laugh so hard😂😂🤣

  • @drewcummings2453
    @drewcummings2453 3 роки тому +7

    Courier is used because it's an "evenly spaced" typeface, every character takes up the same vertical and horizontal space, making the font easy to read and consistent across the page. It also makes it much easier to write notes in the margin. It's used a lot in lit mags to make slush readers lives easier

  • @Balefactor
    @Balefactor 5 років тому +66

    I can't be the only one who got "Did you know that Ryan Reynolds is also a lawyer?" from the thumbnail

    • @TwoStupidGeniuses
      @TwoStupidGeniuses 5 років тому +7

      I need a movie about Deadpool going to law school

    • @jjducci
      @jjducci 5 років тому +1

      Looks more like
      John Krasinski to me

  • @stickyblicky11
    @stickyblicky11 6 років тому +186

    I bet he doesn't wear pants

  • @gjb520
    @gjb520 6 років тому +214

    Not an objection, just a note for the record. The description you've given about court reporters is accurate. Although in the movie, from the way they were stroking the keys, I could tell they were not real court reporters. And I've never seen a court reporter put their steno machine on top of a table. It's usually on a tripod about waist level to the reporter. Typing with arms and hands up that high, as depicted in the movie, would cause great muscle strain to the arms and back. I'm guessing the reason the steno machines were on the table must have been so it would be visible on camera.

    • @cerebrumexcrement
      @cerebrumexcrement 6 років тому +12

      they’re called “actors”.

    • @gjb520
      @gjb520 6 років тому +16

      @@cerebrumexcrement. Thank you for that clarification

    • @donkeyhobo34
      @donkeyhobo34 6 років тому +2

      @@gjb520 I love you

    • @Widestone001
      @Widestone001 6 років тому +14

      I loved to see her waving her hands at the steno machine and watching words appear on the laptop screen. In general, when using computers, movies are very often not overly accurate.
      People hit a button, mash a couple of keys and within about 2 seconds the computer is fully activated, a program is opened and the screen is filled with several windows full of outputs from that program. Very amusing xD

  • @DemonBoy3223
    @DemonBoy3223 6 років тому +10

    I would love to see more movies set in deposition meetings, _Social Network_ did it so well, especially in how director David Fincher and writer Aaron Sorkin managed to craft an interesting narrative structure to it.

  • @adriannaz7954
    @adriannaz7954 5 років тому +141

    OBJECTION! You did not call the twins the “Winkelvi”.

    • @StandardGoose
      @StandardGoose 3 роки тому +2

      I think they'd actually be the Winklevoi.

  • @jasonapollo9916
    @jasonapollo9916 3 роки тому +12

    The Social Network, a movie that actually borrowed heavily from a deposition, got the same grade as Lionel Hutz.

  • @Matrim42
    @Matrim42 6 років тому +23

    Re: Courier typeface
    I imagine the reason stenographers use it is the same reason screenwriters use it. It’s a monospaced font, meaning each character takes up an equal amount of space (as opposed to proportional fonts where smaller letters like “i” take up less space than bigger letters like “w”) and this makes the text layout much more predictable and easier to reference across different platforms.

    • @alexm566
      @alexm566 4 роки тому +1

      software engineers use it too for the same reason. it's the default font on most command line terminals and code editors.

  • @VivaFrei
    @VivaFrei 6 років тому +324

    There is nothing better than one lawyer trying to tell the stenographer to stop typing, and the other lawyer telling the sonographer to keep typing to keep it all on the record. P.S. I was usually the lawyer telling the stenographer to keep typing to keep everything on the record. So often, lawyers want to go off the record to say things that opposing counsel really would want to be on the record ;-)

    • @3ngin33r7
      @3ngin33r7 6 років тому +21

      How much can that be abused? 'Cause I can see myself as a lawyer adding 10 hours to a deposition for no reason other than to be difficult.

    • @gjb520
      @gjb520 6 років тому +96

      That's happened to me. I was reporting a deposition. One counsel told me to go off the record. The other counsel immediately responded by telling me not to go off the record. And then about 5-minute argument ensued with the attorneys going back and forth arguing about whether I should keep typing or not. I kept everything on the record, taking down their argument, but felt so uncomfortable. It was only about 5 minutes, but felt more like a half hour to me.

    • @VivaFrei
      @VivaFrei 6 років тому +40

      Tlz Tlsrz haha! Classic! Lawyers always go off the record to say something that they would never dare say on the record. I try never to give them that opportunity. As far as I’m concerned, nothing should ever be “off the record” except settlement discussions.

    • @stufffstufffington
      @stufffstufffington 6 років тому +24

      @@3ngin33r7 If another party behaves in an abusive or harassing manner during a deposition you can try calling the judge to get an order as to certain behavior or questioning, or you can continue the deposition until such time that you can get in front of a judge.

    • @cerebrumexcrement
      @cerebrumexcrement 6 років тому

      lol damn

  • @Boyzby
    @Boyzby 6 років тому +11

    These transitions in to sponsors at the end of the videos are always good. If someone compliments you on ads, you're doing pretty well. XD

  • @MJFERMEZLA
    @MJFERMEZLA 5 років тому +566

    OBJECTION : "Intolerable Cruelty", the Coen Brothers movie for a next video. That would be fun and instresting.

    • @bossmorris1
      @bossmorris1 4 роки тому +5

      Good you havethe kids this is doordash o

    • @elalesound
      @elalesound 4 роки тому +1

      It's an AAAAWEEEEESOOOOOME movie!!!! Brilliant and cynical!!!

    • @sokratech
      @sokratech 4 роки тому

      @@bossmorris1 das nicht trotzdem noch ein bisschen zoophil das nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein ist jede natürliche Person ist das denn für eine Rolle spielt sie mir die Rechnung von ihnen erhalten wie ich das Gefühl das zu spät für dich auch nicht viel verändert die ganze Woche zu kommen falls das für sie da war der erste große Freude gemacht eine Rolle spielt sie mir die Rechnung von ihnen erhalten wie ich es anders nicht geht aber nicht haja ich das nicht trotzdem noch nicht einmal eine Mail von Frau macht es ist ein megakolon das nicht der vorgesehene Empfänger sein ist jede natürliche Person ist das denn was die Absicht war doch auch ein bisschen Interesse entwickle kommt ihr mit der hand das nicht trotzdem ein paar Monate alt ich habe ich mich nicht 4

    • @LuisSierra42
      @LuisSierra42 3 роки тому

      Very funny movie sir, i like it a lot

    • @ethersecure2432
      @ethersecure2432 3 роки тому

      Sustained.

  • @eedwardgrey2
    @eedwardgrey2 4 роки тому +1

    7:33 Im reminded of the court martial scene in Blackadder goes forth where Baldrick has to testify against captain Blackadder and is told to "deny everything" . He then denies his own name, rank and when the defense lawyer (Percy, his squadmate) says "Come on Baldrick it's me" he replies "no it isn't" .

  • @Mirach84
    @Mirach84 6 років тому +86

    13:32 It's Natalie Portman, for those wondering.

    • @ArjonRahman
      @ArjonRahman 4 роки тому +3

      Flavio Fernandes Matt Damon and rashida jones too (the woman who plays the junior associate in this movie)

    • @tommytimp
      @tommytimp 4 роки тому +7

      @@ArjonRahman Neither of them was at Harvard in 2004.

    • @itsjestic7682
      @itsjestic7682 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah, she was in Star Wars during this time

  • @concernedcitizen6313
    @concernedcitizen6313 6 років тому +7

    Courier may be used in legal documents, as well as screenplays and such, in part just because it was very common in olden times (a few decades ago) but also because it's what's called a "monospaced" font, meaning that each character uses the exact same horizontal space as any other. I'm not entirely sure why this would be useful for legal documents, except perhaps for creating makeshift tables using the space key to separate items in such a way that they align properly. Really, the fact that characters align from one line to the next is the only useful feature that I can think of.

  • @eat_ze_bugs
    @eat_ze_bugs 6 років тому +505

    Oh wow, I didn't know Facebook was real! What a surprise!

    • @Iukeafk
      @Iukeafk 6 років тому +8

      smh

    • @Matt_10203
      @Matt_10203 6 років тому +3

      @@Iukeafk joke.wav

    • @Iukeafk
      @Iukeafk 6 років тому +13

      @@Matt_10203 r/woosh

    • @TheSefirosu200x
      @TheSefirosu200x 5 років тому

      What

    • @echt114
      @echt114 4 роки тому +2

      It's real in the same sense that a psychosomatic illness is real.

  • @BlueGeen
    @BlueGeen 4 роки тому +6

    Thank you for making me watch “What is a photocopier”. Amazing

  • @mattcampbell4150
    @mattcampbell4150 5 років тому +103

    OBJECTION! 2:28 you missed a perfect opportunity to say, "The tip of the Jesse Ice-enberg."
    I rest my case.

  • @aiamehinamori9738
    @aiamehinamori9738 6 років тому +52

    The Wire reaction please (Omar testifies against Bird and Clay Davis takes the stand). Season 2 Episode 6 (plus maybe S2 Ep5 - explains part about Omar's clothes) and Season 5 Episode 7 (plus maybe S5 Ep4 - Clay Davis Grand Jury testimony).

    • @aceshighdueceslow
      @aceshighdueceslow 6 років тому +4

      yes, finally someone else demanding The Wire

    • @omegachaos32
      @omegachaos32 6 років тому

      You should include the episode name or season/episode number if you want him to consider it. He may or may not be familiar with the show and your comment is far too vague for someone that hasn't seen it. (I mean this in a constructive way, not trying to be a jerk).

    • @aiamehinamori9738
      @aiamehinamori9738 6 років тому

      @@omegachaos32 Yeah, you're right, thank you.

    • @evilgeek87
      @evilgeek87 6 років тому +1

      That show is scarily true to the reality of what is happening on the streets of Baltimore. The bigger plot points though do have a degree of cinematic license, but nevertheless I feel like since David Simon was a reporter in the area for many years he has a very good understanding of the reality of what is happening in the city. Plus a huge pro-union pro-newspaper bias, like seasons 2 and 5 seem like they are the point of the whole show, with the rest of the seasons being corroborating evidence from his perspective. Regardless it's a great show and I'd love to see it covered.

    • @blindey
      @blindey 6 років тому +1

      I said the same, OP. Would love that. Davis' scene is s5e7.

  • @CandidLynn
    @CandidLynn 6 років тому +75

    Class was canceled today because of the cold weather but this is a far more entertaining substitute.

    • @donkeyhobo34
      @donkeyhobo34 6 років тому

      I'm in love with you

    • @CandidLynn
      @CandidLynn 6 років тому +4

      @@donkeyhobo34 well this escalated quickly

    • @donkeyhobo34
      @donkeyhobo34 6 років тому

      @@CandidLynn marry me?

    • @sanna9062
      @sanna9062 6 років тому +1

      It's so funny to me that in some countries classes are cancelled. In Finland, classes aren't cancelled even when it's freezing cold outside (-20 Celsius).

    • @CandidLynn
      @CandidLynn 6 років тому

      @@donkeyhobo34 Im not ready for that kind of commitment, lol

  • @confusedwhale
    @confusedwhale 6 років тому +31

    Yes, but an affidavit doesn't make good viewing.
    Maybe it's actually an affidavit, but it was dramatized as if it was a deposition.

  • @renehenriquez4021
    @renehenriquez4021 2 роки тому +2

    I love this channel, I just discovered some days ago and I always surprised all the movies and series he already analyzed, it's awesome!

  • @zeusmasterson4117
    @zeusmasterson4117 5 років тому +37

    The movie star was Natalie Portman, if anyone else has wondered.

    • @allsmightykill
      @allsmightykill 5 років тому

      What

    • @GerryBolger
      @GerryBolger 5 років тому +11

      @@allsmightykill Natalie Portman was the movie star Mark Zuckerberg went to school with.

    • @allsmightykill
      @allsmightykill 5 років тому

      @@GerryBolger thanks

    • @akmonra
      @akmonra 5 років тому +2

      If I'm correct, they couldn't mention it in the film for legal reasons.

    • @thelordofhellaz
      @thelordofhellaz 4 роки тому +2

      @@akmonra She was consulted and gave info on Harvard at her time for the movie to use......which is why they made that line of dialog :-)

  • @chimerablack4913
    @chimerablack4913 6 років тому +33

    OBJECTION - Do you object to things in a deposition, or just say "my client isn't answering that"?

  • @bigmclargehuge8219
    @bigmclargehuge8219 5 років тому +77

    "I invented Facebook." "There's some truth to that."

  • @acidiclight
    @acidiclight 3 роки тому +8

    There was once a time in school where we needed to study a local police report for a cosed case so we would learn how police reports looked like and what the police did. It was elementary school. Fun fact: The entire thing was typed in Courier font.

  • @adambarkham6116
    @adambarkham6116 5 років тому +4

    This might be the only time I've seen a wix ad that convinced me its not bad😂

  • @womensarmycorpsveteran2904
    @womensarmycorpsveteran2904 5 років тому +2

    It’s called a stenographer machine. We don’t call it typing, we are “writing”. We use different combinations of keys to record syllables and also “briefs” which are abbreviations for standard phrases.

  • @jake3551
    @jake3551 6 років тому +275

    Objection! Your shirt wrinkles in a weird way.

    • @God-cc6yp
      @God-cc6yp 6 років тому

      lmao

    • @davidpuckett3079
      @davidpuckett3079 6 років тому +40

      Overruled that has nothing to do with the case

    • @erinc.1610
      @erinc.1610 6 років тому +34

      Objection! He simply cannot stop his great manly body from trying to get out of that shirt.

    • @joelmacdonald8332
      @joelmacdonald8332 6 років тому +9

      crap now i cant unsee it

    • @fredfredburger5150
      @fredfredburger5150 5 років тому +1

      It's too tight/tailored incorrectly. Hence the whiskering.

  • @DragDenDFO
    @DragDenDFO 6 років тому +4

    8:47 Automatic subtitles: "... the plaintiff's lawyer is asking questions of sucker" :D

  • @ScottMStolz
    @ScottMStolz 5 років тому +4

    In the scene where the lawyer is deposing her own witness, the testimony (or similar testimony) might actually be from an affidavit, and the filmmakers decided to present it as a deposition for cinematic effect.

  • @migueltc4210
    @migueltc4210 5 років тому +6

    6:30 OBJECTION!
    Im studying audiovisual comunication
    And in script they teached us that we must write in courier or courier new because its an standar
    In theory 1 page of script in courier its equal to 1 min in the real world
    I suppose that they use courier so you can get an aproximation of the time of the speach

  • @SpikedGamingOfficial
    @SpikedGamingOfficial 5 років тому +1

    Man I love this channel. Probably one of the most interesting series of videos I've seen in a loooong time

  • @PutingPinoy
    @PutingPinoy 6 років тому +25

    Yay!!! I super love your videos, Legal Eagle! Please do more about Better Call Saul and Breaking Bad! Have you done To Kill A Mockibgbird yet? I understand that that is majorly idealized, but I would still love your view on it!

    • @starwarsnerd100
      @starwarsnerd100 6 років тому

      Idealized? In TKAMB Atticus loses the case.

    • @PutingPinoy
      @PutingPinoy 6 років тому +3

      I meant that as a lawyer Finch was majorly an idealist, and I am curious about how accurate of a reflection that is of the world of lawyers.

  • @NetAndyCz
    @NetAndyCz 6 років тому +6

    Courier font is mono-spaced, every character has the same width, which means every line has the same amount of characters. It looks weird because 'w' and 'm' are the same width as 'i' or 'l', but it has some uses, it is helpful especially in programming (the spaces are as wide as characters so you can have nice hierarchic structure of the code), though I can see how it could be useful to screenwriters too. Not sure how it is useful to stenographers, but I assume they find it handy for similar reasons.

    • @seraphina985
      @seraphina985 6 років тому +1

      It's probably useful to be able to gauge timing for any exerts that you plan to read out at trial etc as planning out the timing of your presentation is likely to be important especially to make sure that you don't end up losing momentum by running up against the end of a sitting at a critical stage in the testimony etc. I can see this being even more important when planning things like cross examinations especially if they are going to be long and run over multiple sittings, being interrupted by a recess in a key line of questioning on cross is probably going to turn out badly, not only do you lose momentum but you could easily end up tipping your hand to your opponent and then give them time to think over their response to the rest of your line of questioning.

  • @Contemplativeman101
    @Contemplativeman101 6 років тому +25

    I hope you’ll try Philidelphia (1993)

    • @Dang3rousd
      @Dang3rousd 6 років тому +1

      Having just rewatched this on TCM, I was thinking the same thing.

  • @Lark1610
    @Lark1610 4 роки тому +21

    That movie star part is about Natalie Portman, who actually studied at Harvard around the same time Zuckerberg did (she started few years before him I believe) and was providing some inside for Fincher and Sorkin for this movie.

  • @Megan-ii4gf
    @Megan-ii4gf 4 роки тому +33

    "based on a real person"
    I'm glad the lizard people finally have human rights.

  • @EvaStrikerZero
    @EvaStrikerZero 5 років тому +3

    I've been binge watching these videos and by gosh they're all so entertaining.

  • @derecksheppard5913
    @derecksheppard5913 6 років тому +59

    In high school a technical college talked to the seniors about jobs they probably didn't know about. Since I was a _total nerd_ that had a computer (mid to late 90's where very different) who typed like 290 GWAM (*edited*)I thought that court reporter really sounded interesting. I waited until after the class was done to ask her about it so I didn't seem like an even bigger nerd, then actually followed through with it. Until I was given a CD that had lessons and a cardboard Stenotype. I couldn't even begin to function with it and couldn't get used to the single stroke methods or phonetic aspects. In all these legal shows/movies I focus on them because of that experience and knowing how hard a skill it actually is.

    • @osmium6832
      @osmium6832 6 років тому +17

      I imagine it might've been particularly difficult for you specifically because you were so good at typing on a regular keyboard. Switching to something like a DVORAK would also be incredibly challenging because of the muscle memory you developed to be able to type 290 wpm (I looked it up and world record is 216 wpm, but I'll just assume you were misremembering and you typed at a rapid but realistic speed, like 120-150, which is still 3-4x faster than average). Learning a stenographer's keyboard is like relearning how to speak with one of those Steven Hawking voice boxes. Similar outcome (recording information or communicating verbally), but very different methods.

    • @derecksheppard5913
      @derecksheppard5913 6 років тому +2

      @@osmium6832 As far as all those "quick brown fox" type of programs can be accurate. But yeah, re-reading my message it was GWAM not WPM. When you where done with your assignment 5-10 minutes into the 45 minutes they gave you in typing classes back then they'd just have you screw around with the teaching software. The only thing that could slow you down was when you had to reach for numbers really.

    • @ingriddubbel8468
      @ingriddubbel8468 5 років тому +1

      Were not where

    • @cutienerdgirl
      @cutienerdgirl 5 років тому

      I could do single stroke methods because I'm horrible at typing the proper way.

  • @ben_clifford
    @ben_clifford 6 років тому +4

    "You may have heard of Facebook" Brilliant outro.

  • @pinkace
    @pinkace 2 роки тому +1

    7:49 oh my god thank you for pointing me to that video, that's one of the funniest thing I've ever seen.

  • @AkashChocks
    @AkashChocks 4 роки тому +12

    The amount of knowledge I've gained in the last 20 minutes is crazyy

  • @MrKaje72
    @MrKaje72 6 років тому +4

    I just wanted to say thank you. I'm going to be finishing my business degree next year(I'll be an accountant). After watching your videos I think I'm going to go to law school in the coming years

  • @a_serious_musician
    @a_serious_musician 6 років тому +10

    Objection, Zucc wasn't refusing to answer that he answered "yes" to a prior question, he was mocking the use of the phrase "the affirmative" to mean "yes."
    "Do you remember answering in the affirmative?" (i.e Do you remember answering yes?)
    "The affirmative" (i.e. yes)

    • @EnterJustice
      @EnterJustice 5 років тому +1

      He wasn't refusing to answer, nor was he actually saying "yes". He was mocking the attorney for his choice of words.

  • @liquidrock2u
    @liquidrock2u 6 років тому +23

    I've always wondered how the Stenographer could type so fast. How does the machine work exactly?

  • @NonTwinBrothers
    @NonTwinBrothers 17 днів тому

    I'm in court reporting school and this is my favorite video to watch :D

  • @McChick
    @McChick 3 роки тому +1

    I really found this video interesting and some comparison to Canadian law:
    1. In Canada (or at least Ontario) we call depositions Examination for Discovery.
    2. Opposing parties are allowed to sit in on other party’s discovery but it is pretty rare.
    3. After a discovery (or disposition) we don’t go to summary judgment motion… we go to mediation if mandatory and then pretrial and trial (years later).
    I really liked this video and found it very interesting to see the differences and similarities!

  • @Pannemat
    @Pannemat 5 років тому +151

    You talking: volume accurate.
    Movie clips: volume too low.
    Exam grade tune: volume too high!
    That scared the shibeebus out of me and it looked like an annoying ad.

    • @Chaotic_Good94
      @Chaotic_Good94 4 роки тому

      True

    • @ValerieJNorse
      @ValerieJNorse 3 роки тому

      I literally had to turn on closed captions to understand the movie clips.

  • @podemosurss8316
    @podemosurss8316 6 років тому +5

    5:18 I'm imagining a legal argument about having lunch...
    OBJECTION! In your previous testimony you said you wanted to have lunch and called to the Pizza Hut! But now you want to buy some burgers!

  • @LegionKilo
    @LegionKilo 5 років тому +3

    He paid 65 million to the Winklevoss twins, Tha Zuck is worth 73.9 billion, and the market cap of Facebook is 566 billion. 20:13 It's a speeding ticket alright.

  • @NotEnoughAlpacas
    @NotEnoughAlpacas 4 роки тому

    I was listening to this in my pocket at work and didn't realize it had switched over to an ad so I listened to a minute and a half of an ad about weight loss, the entire time thinking "this was an odd turn for this video to take."

    • @ValerieJNorse
      @ValerieJNorse 3 роки тому

      Josh Calvert -- I literally LOL'd!

  • @jonbondMPG
    @jonbondMPG Рік тому

    6:30 it's not "courier" per se, it's any fixed width font so that the character kerning does not interfere with the literal context, and then you can align items without any formatting tools. This is very much why us programmers also almost always use fixed width fonts too.