What if we made a camera that sees in reverse?

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 6 тис.

  • @StuffMadeHere
    @StuffMadeHere  День тому +885

    If you’re interested in messing around with data from the camera I’ll be posting some of the raw data for these pictures on my Patreon: patreon.com/stuffmadehere. Also, THANK YOU to all the patrons who support these projects!

    • @Keenora
      @Keenora День тому +2

      Ohhh new video, I am down! x3

    • @Lavassin
      @Lavassin День тому +9

      He made stuff

    • @dogefort8410
      @dogefort8410 День тому +2

      What's the key benefits of Patreon membership again? 🤔

    • @Basement_CNC
      @Basement_CNC День тому +6

      Who needs drugs when you can have engineering???? I DO.... It's called coffee and red bull.....I'd also go for something stronger and less legal, but I've already blown my budget on the parts of the engineering project 😂

    • @ikesau
      @ikesau День тому +2

      i am so grateful that you continue to defy the incentives to make "lightning vs laser" videos or whatever. gonna finally sign up to your patreon now to hopefully help keep it that way 🤞

  • @smartereveryday
    @smartereveryday День тому +11154

    When you made the real life Orthographic Photo I was so happy for you. That's a huge deal.
    Awesome video!

    • @SS001-w3e
      @SS001-w3e День тому +24

    • @drhxa
      @drhxa День тому +114

      Agreed, this one is HUGE! Very impressive result, congrats!

    • @quertz42
      @quertz42 День тому

      There is an amazing video by Applied Science where he plays around with an actual physical lens that does the same!:
      watch?v=iJ4yL6kaV1A

    • @aargourdin
      @aargourdin День тому +59

      Incredible and has some pretty interesting implications for how the Nth iteration of this camera could be utilized. So cool!

    • @BojanMilic84
      @BojanMilic84 День тому +20

      Yo, Destin, shouldn't you be blowing something up? Why are you wasting time on YT? Just kidding, love your stuff.

  • @idoReadme2
    @idoReadme2 23 години тому +6320

    I know I'm probably the odd one but I liked it more when you didn't gloss over the details and the debugging process this much. It made me learn stuff so it wasn't just entertainment. Impressive project nonetheless!

    • @СемёнСемёнович-д9п
      @СемёнСемёнович-д9п 22 години тому +91

      Absolutelly

    • @UXXV
      @UXXV 21 годину тому +243

      Yeah this one was a bit rushed it felt

    • @luciomagno6195
      @luciomagno6195 21 годину тому +24

      Yeah same

    • @enneff
      @enneff 21 годину тому +259

      I could totally watch the 2 hour version of this video with all the blind alleys, code, math, everything.

    • @ljsmith8456
      @ljsmith8456 21 годину тому +83

      Big agree! You're not the only weird one... I find stuffs troubleshooting / trial and error inspiring and interesting, slightly missed on this video but still an amazing video!

  • @VenseyNess
    @VenseyNess День тому +5694

    All you need to see around walls is a dense enough object to perform gravitational lensing. Can your CNC work on singularities?

    • @MrBubmer
      @MrBubmer День тому +312

      Don't give him ideas, next thing we'll know is there's an apocalyptic event at a warehouse

    • @BlueGamingRage
      @BlueGamingRage День тому +64

      Bending light is a solution

    • @a64738
      @a64738 День тому +34

      Or just use mirrors and make a periscope...

    • @SkinnyObelix
      @SkinnyObelix День тому +22

      or a window

    • @cyanhacker
      @cyanhacker День тому +24

      Brick is dense enough to hit the wall

  • @lindybeige
    @lindybeige 10 годин тому +97

    Fantastic work! This must have some practical applications. I was disappointed not to see a perspectiveless picture of a cube. Could it be used to create clothing patterns on a mannikin? I suppose that existing 3D CAD can do that another way, but it might be a way to reverse engineer a pattern from clothing. Could you create a funky animated sequence by scanning the same thing many times with different lenses and then viewing the pictures in sequence?

    • @VcSaJen
      @VcSaJen 8 годин тому +4

      Yeah, I was expecting a cube, and a lot of other pictures. Just one picture per simulated lens type is really not enough.

    • @brianargo4595
      @brianargo4595 5 годин тому +4

      Oooh! It's Lindy! I'm allowed to be a pedant! A mannikin/manikin is an anatomical model, a mannequin is for fashion, though when I was in art class it was always a mannequin here in the US.

    • @ScottiStudios
      @ScottiStudios 4 години тому +1

      Yes! I cam here to say the same thing. Really wanted to see perspectiveless photo of a cube, and also a reverse-perspective photo of a cube. Please do a short, StuffMadeHere :P --- Great video tho, what a brilliant idea :D

    • @GhostGK21
      @GhostGK21 3 години тому

      It's Lindy Beige!

  • @Benlucky13
    @Benlucky13 День тому +2186

    if anyone else was curious, the transimpedance amplifier he talks about at 10:25 is listed at $537.91. I can see why he wanted to build his own

    • @sometimesleela5947
      @sometimesleela5947 23 години тому +220

      A cheap source of these is old supermarket checkout scanners. I used to get lots of these from the scrapyard to harvest the lasers and driver modules, but they're probably on the auction sites. The photodiode sits right on the amp board inside a shield. Great for making laserbounce listeners with just a simple lm386 audio amp added.

    • @turbochoochoo
      @turbochoochoo 22 години тому +82

      Id argue that's a pretty good deal considering the cost of his time.

    • @BooBar2521
      @BooBar2521 22 години тому +16

      Haha I even paused to check if there was a price

    • @InservioLetum
      @InservioLetum 22 години тому

      ...hang on there's a machine to impede trans people?

    • @zilfondel
      @zilfondel 21 годину тому +5

      Is that a real word?

  • @nerfherder4284
    @nerfherder4284 20 годин тому +1397

    I wonder if your camera could be used to simulate what animals with different shaped irises would see such as horses, goats or cats, or octopuses.

  • @ElectroBOOM
    @ElectroBOOM День тому +1728

    Awesome as always!!

  • @beavismount
    @beavismount 13 годин тому +31

    I wrote off the idea of an orthographic camera as impossible after years of playing in Blender and CAD, and now my feeling of awe is intense! This was a joy to see, please keep taking pictures with that thing.
    I'd also enjoy a separate video going over the image building code and component selection in moderate detail. Like the kind of broad strokes that apply across languages and software.

    • @vexnity460
      @vexnity460 5 годин тому

      IKR? i was super amazed by the orthographic camera

    • @idontknowanygoodnames1498
      @idontknowanygoodnames1498 3 години тому

      There does exist lenses for regular cameras that give an orphographic perspective.

  • @CharlieKellyEsq
    @CharlieKellyEsq День тому +5902

    I know it takes a REALLY long time to create your projects and edit them. But I'm going to need you to take stimulants, stay up 72 hours per day and pump out one of these every 3 or 4 days

    • @drake1636
      @drake1636 День тому +180

      He already does

    • @artiumromanov9798
      @artiumromanov9798 День тому +104

      Crazy comment. Hilarious too

    • @MrCandyPants
      @MrCandyPants День тому +66

      He owes it to humanity

    • @MonkeMan54
      @MonkeMan54 День тому +9

      Definitely

    • @Vik1919
      @Vik1919 День тому +25

      ​@@MrCandyPants He owes nothing. You need to contribute instead, he's already doing it by being himself.

  • @Spirit532
    @Spirit532 День тому +1840

    Fun fact: all of these wacky lenses simulated in this video actually exist, and are widely used in manufacturing and inspection! Telecentric(no perspective) lenses are most common and very popular in metrology, but pericentric(seeing more than one side of the object), hypercentric(seeing behind and/or underneath the object), and even wacky combinations with mirrors. This allows you, as a common example, to inspect the cap on a plastic bottle from all sides, at the same time, using the same camera. Above, around the corners, from the side, AND from below!

    • @evanbarnes9984
      @evanbarnes9984 День тому +75

      Shane used a telecentric lens on the puzzle robot!

    • @The_NSeven
      @The_NSeven День тому +13

      These lenses are so cool. If only they could easily (and cheaply) be adapted to digital cameras.

    • @LenovoIdeaPad3
      @LenovoIdeaPad3 День тому +1

      i need an example

    • @genesises
      @genesises День тому +5

      @@evanbarnes9984 it's almost as if you watched the video

    • @ivanjermakov
      @ivanjermakov День тому +30

      Yep, it's just hard to apply on normal-life-sized objects because this would requite aperture to be meters in diameter.

  • @jakobfink6007
    @jakobfink6007 22 години тому +501

    There’s absolutely no other UA-cam channel that I look forward to as much as this one! The content here is simply outstanding, the quality is unmatched, and the way complex topics are presented in such an engaging and fascinating way is truly remarkable. Every new video feels like a gift, and I can’t wait for the next one to drop. This channel isn’t just entertaining; it’s a genuine contribution to society. Incredible work, keep it up!

  • @HartleysFilms
    @HartleysFilms 13 годин тому +2

    As a filmmaker and camera lover, this was seriously amazing. This kind of camera could make some amazing art. I can't help but wonder what video would look like from some of these configurations.
    Speaking of art, you said this camera feels a lot more like creating art. Art is all about making *choices*. And here you're making a LOT of choices about the way you're photographing your subject.

  • @x0urce942
    @x0urce942 18 годин тому +419

    We definetly need a StuffMadeHere2 video about how you even came up with the idea and how you went from nonsense to actual Images @11:56
    There are a lot of questionst that, as you said, went unanswered

    • @stuartallen2001
      @stuartallen2001 14 годин тому +27

      Maybe it could be called StuffMadeThere?

    • @willierants5880
      @willierants5880 14 годин тому +2

      @@stuartallen2001 Good one.

    • @teemukarjalainen5361
      @teemukarjalainen5361 13 годин тому +1

      My guess is there was some bug with the code mapping angle sensor output to real world position. About the idea I'm betting he was pondering one day what would it take to make a real life ortho camera. I sure have pondered the same but quickly thought it must be impossible. This still baffles me though that it seemed to work so well. How far can you see with the thing? what if you point it a mile away? What if you point it to the moon (assuming there was so super accurate rig to keep it pointed at the same spot on moon surface?

    • @Stirdix
      @Stirdix 13 годин тому

      @@teemukarjalainen5361 I'd think the primary limitation is the angular resolution, determined by the length of your tube - keeping in mind also that a longer tube is a narrower field of view, hence less light and therefore noisier. [And also, at least if you actually look at the moon, atmospheric distortions.]

    • @helper_bot
      @helper_bot 12 годин тому

      seems like it was just warped and the equations didnt line up
      if he was using a still image pattern wall for debugging instead of an actual wall, could've probably debug it easier

  • @danny2667
    @danny2667 День тому +1626

    "Medusa whack-a-mole, where you fix a problem and two more appear"
    You got your mythological creatures mixed up. You were thinking of a hydra ;)

    • @BarrytheSuperScot
      @BarrytheSuperScot День тому +125

      I immediately paused the video and came to the comments to see if anyone caught that! 🤣

    • @Josh-qm7fl
      @Josh-qm7fl День тому +23

      @@BarrytheSuperScot Same xD

    • @NOTNOTJON
      @NOTNOTJON День тому +165

      'Like playing Medusa whack-a-mole where you fix one problem and it proptly truns some part of your project into stone and eventually all the problems in your project are heavy weights you drag over the finish line.' Is what I think he meant.

    • @Derixyleth
      @Derixyleth День тому +5

      @@Josh-qm7fl Also same lol

    • @Galerak1
      @Galerak1 День тому +13

      Hail Hydra

  • @mploehrer
    @mploehrer 15 годин тому +206

    14:07 You blew my mind with that image. I just paused the video and thought for a long time before resuming. Incredible work.

    • @ultralysp
      @ultralysp 10 годин тому +5

      I think this image made me realize what perspective really is. I’ve had my share of decades in this life, so it’s a big deal to have a smart person explain complex things in a simple way!

    • @Verchiel_
      @Verchiel_ 10 годин тому +4

      He krilled styro pyro
      Styro pyro has been reduced to mannequin

    • @Dasspapirfly
      @Dasspapirfly 9 годин тому +1

      Had the same experience, just sitting and thinking and then looking around in the office and trying to visualise how it would look without perspective

    • @rooknado
      @rooknado 9 годин тому

      I concur. It only gets crazier!

    • @pumbaa667
      @pumbaa667 8 годин тому

      Same.
      And then the one at 14:45 blew each previous mind-particles again.

  • @Yamyatos
    @Yamyatos 8 годин тому +15

    I knew looking around stuff was impossible, but the way you sold it, im still disappointed by the (overall pretty cool) result lol. It's just.. the camera looks "around" stuff, basically the same way somebody with a selfie stick would look around whatever you are hiding behind. By moving the camera such that it has direct line of sight. In in a way, it doesnt look around anything, at any point in time. It's just that the stationary center of the camera has no direct line of sight.. but the camera does. I think you could have sold this camera differently to make it less disappointing.

    • @caspianmaclean8122
      @caspianmaclean8122 3 години тому

      I thought it was going to calculate the view behind an wall by inferring from indirect lighting and shadows, like if you could see a shadow poking out from behind a wall, you might know something is there, and with careful calculations and assumptions you could get more detail. Pretty sure I saw someone working on something like this for "looking" around a corner in a corridor.

  • @philipdirnberger
    @philipdirnberger 20 годин тому +174

    I’ve always loved your videos and appreciate the effort you put into them! Lately, though, I’ve noticed a shift, they seem to gloss over some of the details that used to make them so engaging. I understand you might be catering to a younger audience, but for many of us who watched for the in-depth problem-solving, that was the real draw. Have you considered creating a second channel or series for those of us who enjoy the deeper dive? It could be a great way to cater to both audiences!

    • @nictheregulardude
      @nictheregulardude 18 годин тому +7

      I’m with you on this!

    • @poolkrooni
      @poolkrooni 18 годин тому +4

      He does in fact have a second channel!

    • @poolkrooni
      @poolkrooni 18 годин тому +9

      Stuff Made Here 2, it was made for that very purpose (deep dives), but now sees way less frequent uploads than the main channel

    • @philipdirnberger
      @philipdirnberger 16 годин тому +3

      ​@@poolkrooni Woah! Thank you lol-I had no idea it existed! I just checked it out, and it looks like a great start. However, it feels like there could be more content related to what’s posted on the main channel. I was hoping to see more.

    • @nononanonon
      @nononanonon 8 годин тому +1

      I would pay for extended cuts. This content has real value. Just saying.

  • @sodmade9446
    @sodmade9446 20 годин тому +304

    Him dropping a video is almost like Christmas. It immediately makes my day at least a bit better

    • @petertomasini3294
      @petertomasini3294 18 годин тому +1

      Same

    • @VicJang
      @VicJang 17 годин тому

      JCS Criminal Psychology dropped a video on the same day too. Today is insane.

    • @spaced5155
      @spaced5155 17 годин тому

      stop the glaze poof

    • @13donstalos
      @13donstalos 16 годин тому

      I also find Xmas to be rather unsatisfying

  • @aJaklin
    @aJaklin День тому +392

    15:08 sick album cover

    • @MetalShopBuilds
      @MetalShopBuilds 23 години тому +2

      ya

    • @NotGabe001
      @NotGabe001 23 години тому +19

      that was my first thought for the first color photo

    • @osmium7738
      @osmium7738 21 годину тому +1

      That's exactly what I thought, lol

    • @pablogriswold421
      @pablogriswold421 21 годину тому +6

      v a p o r w a v e

    • @nauga2295
      @nauga2295 19 годин тому

      I was coming to comments to say that exact same thing.

  • @sebastiansteffen4554
    @sebastiansteffen4554 4 години тому +2

    This project can not stop with this video. Dont start a next one yet, instead have some fun with the camera and do a second vid. The picture turn out too nice to put it aside now

  • @gk5947
    @gk5947 День тому +419

    11:39 wait, isn't the hydra the creature that grows back their heads?

    • @fikus7879
      @fikus7879 День тому +17

      That's what i wanted to say!

    • @Jack93885
      @Jack93885 День тому +24

      Yup, Medusa was the mortal Gorgon (a creature that can turn people who look at them to stone) who was killed by Perseus

    • @Bassalicious
      @Bassalicious День тому +11

      not just grow back - grow back more than it lost

    • @wretchedexcess1654
      @wretchedexcess1654 День тому +4

      Dammit an hour too slow...

    • @tolkienfan1972
      @tolkienfan1972 День тому +3

      I had decided not to point this out. 😂

  • @ilyassyakie
    @ilyassyakie 16 годин тому +38

    I only just started watching the video but I already love how there's this precise optical device and it's clamped to a piece of lumber. Makes me feel right at home!

  • @robertschwien6396
    @robertschwien6396 День тому +282

    You may want to use a first surface mirror if you're not already doing so. I used to make machine vision applications and if the camera angle needed to be changed. Using a regular mirror would result in the primary image from the reflective surface on the back of the glass, and a second ghost image reflected from the front of the glass.

    • @moos5221
      @moos5221 День тому +4

      what would it be like, just a highly polished metal sheet without glass?

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 День тому +20

      @@moos5221 - Can be, or sometimes silvered glass but you put the silvered surface on the front (i.e., use the glass just as a substrate, so you only need a very thin layer of deposed metal).

    • @bluerendar2194
      @bluerendar2194 День тому +8

      @@moos5221 Glass behind metal instead of metal behind glass
      Reason why it isn't usually done, the glass protects the metal for one, also it's much easier to make flat glass surfaces (and deposit metal, making the metal contacting it flat) than making flat metal surfaces

    • @moos5221
      @moos5221 День тому

      @@RFC3514 @bluerendar2194 ok, understood, makes sense.

    • @stevenpolak4801
      @stevenpolak4801 День тому +1

      Those are common in laser applications too, like lasercutters. Preventing heat buildup in the glass

  • @KieranSmit
    @KieranSmit 9 годин тому +1

    This has probably, surprisingly, been my favorite of your videos to watch so far. Obviously being able to control perspective to a degree in 3D software is one thing. But to see the images you've created is almost like discovering a new colour or smell. The theory makes sense and seems obvious as to what will happen but seeing it for real (watching a video) is pretty exciting.

  • @brannon5688
    @brannon5688 День тому +488

    "Who needs drugs when you have engineering" lol I absolutely love it xD

    • @9000ft
      @9000ft День тому

      Shh...they'll they will ban creativity next.🤫

    • @DaxCyro
      @DaxCyro 22 години тому +7

      I felt that one. Some of the stuff I've worked on has felt like teetering on the edge of madness.
      And Stuff Made Here works on even crazier stuff than me.

    • @Madfox88
      @Madfox88 18 годин тому +6

      “Why not both?”

    • @xWood4000
      @xWood4000 17 годин тому +2

      I need coffee for my engineering

    • @mrbdmnable
      @mrbdmnable 16 годин тому +4

      Merch!

  • @U_Geek
    @U_Geek 23 години тому +72

    So fun fact, most images you have seen of stars from telescopes looked around an obstacle. Newtonian telescopes have two mirrors with the secondary mirror being in the middle of the of the scope's fov but when well focused it doesn't appear in the final image.

    • @urgay1992
      @urgay1992 20 годин тому

      You can also just buy catadioptric telephoto lenses for normal digital cameras that work on a similar principle. A quirk of them is that out of focus highlights form rings instead of spheres because of the ring shaped aperture.

    • @NovemberIGSnow
      @NovemberIGSnow 13 годин тому +3

      Another fun fact: If you cover the bottom half of a regular camera lens, it will still capture the full field of view. This is because even though the obstruction is blocking 50% of the light going to the lens, all of the light rays are still able to find paths to the detector through the uncovered half of the lens.
      This is in principle the same thing that happens with the secondary mirror in telescopes. The secondary mirror blocks a portion of the incoming light, but there are a bunch of other paths for the light to take that will hit the primary mirror.

  • @RyanMercer
    @RyanMercer День тому +1054

    Oh this should be fun, and semi-safe for once.

    • @Runefrag
      @Runefrag День тому +39

      A giant steel weight spinning around on an arm with exposed electrical wiring touching. Yeah, super safe.

    • @RyanMercer
      @RyanMercer День тому +45

      @@Runefrag safer than several of his last projects though.

    • @rhetorical1488
      @rhetorical1488 День тому +17

      engage your safety squints as prudence the safety goat is on the case.

    • @Voyajer.
      @Voyajer. День тому +5

      ​@@Runefragnow describe operating a car in the same style.

    • @BrockToews
      @BrockToews День тому +1

      You're right. It needs something sharp or explosive.
      Powder actuated spinny cam?

  • @HFZ420
    @HFZ420 12 годин тому +2

    This is so fuggin awesome.
    What an engeneering marvel and an honor to see it working.
    Feels unreal

  • @Ravin428
    @Ravin428 День тому +177

    You should use this camera to film some basic shapes like cubes, cylinders and cones to make a education video for teaching perspective. It could be super useful for art classes and drafting classes.

    • @RFC3514
      @RFC3514 День тому +15

      Basic shapes are easy to draw (or 3D render) with varying perspective anyway. The point of making a camera that can do this is so you can play with perspective in "real" (complex) scenes.
      Anyway, this isn't new. Search for "Hypercentric optics: A camera lens that can see behind objects" for a video published by Applied Science a few years ago (smaller lens, but it's the same principle and works in real time).

    • @dykm2
      @dykm2 22 години тому +1

      I was hoping to see 5 sides of a cube all at once

  • @WolfVidya
    @WolfVidya День тому +176

    16:26 HAVE YOU SEEN THIS MAN IN YOUR DREAMS?

    • @Ksoism
      @Ksoism 23 години тому +1

      Comment that in every other UA-cam video would have a different perspective.

    • @skedfinger
      @skedfinger 23 години тому +1

      Adam Driver you mean?

    • @onlyonecannoli7537
      @onlyonecannoli7537 21 годину тому

      That's my runescape character

  • @biggiecheese7489
    @biggiecheese7489 23 години тому +95

    it always interests me how long these incredible projects take. have you thought about maybe including some sort of date or time stamps throughout the video? its just something i would personally like to see, thats all. but i love getting to see almost every single little step of the process. great video!

    • @iAmGrizzlyBear420
      @iAmGrizzlyBear420 20 годин тому

      Yeah I'd love if the clips had timestamps

    • @brinckau
      @brinckau 18 годин тому +1

      This is his 3rd video in 2024, not counting the one released on January 1st because it was made last year. So, probably 4 months to make one video, on average.

  • @hust_man
    @hust_man 4 години тому +1

    this is actually amazing i subbed and liked.

  • @traviscunningham_1
    @traviscunningham_1 День тому +32

    12:01
    Somebody needs to make a super cut of all of the times Shane has a breakthrough and finally gets his builds to work.
    Truly inspiring stuff, keeps you going. Love these moments.

    • @raphiseth6942
      @raphiseth6942 23 години тому +2

      The best part is without any context this seams very weird to be happy about a picture like that

  • @Mr_Wh1
    @Mr_Wh1 День тому +236

    22:44 - We might never see a video from him again.

    • @Darkstar77_1
      @Darkstar77_1 День тому +10

      The cut was ominous.

    • @kABUSE1
      @kABUSE1 День тому +8

      Insert "totally worth it" meme here

    • @Bob-o-h4k
      @Bob-o-h4k 23 години тому +2

      Ya it’s not looking around a wall he is moving a camera around the wall? Not cool

    • @BroTeachesU
      @BroTeachesU 16 годин тому

      @@Bob-o-h4kThat better be sarcasm

    • @6apa6axx
      @6apa6axx 9 годин тому

      ​@@BroTeachesU He ain't wrong tho. It's a really cool contraption, but it is basically peeking around the object.
      To actually see something from behind you'd need a force capable of bending light rays. Like that demonstration of moving near light speed.

  • @nicknack125
    @nicknack125 День тому +64

    10:30 I 'm a EE at Thorlabs and couldn't agree more - even when prototyping a new product, I'll end up copying the a lot of the analog design from our dark magic wizard analog design engineers, or slapping one of those amplifiers in-line to verify everything works before trying a design myself. The analog stuff gets real funky real fast and it's always best to use something you know will work at first.

    • @williamcox8491
      @williamcox8491 День тому +5

      Does Thorlabs still send the goodie boxes? That was the best part of my PhD

    • @nicknack125
      @nicknack125 День тому +7

      @williamcox8491 Yes! Still doing the labsnacks with all the orders :)

    • @dulmi2317
      @dulmi2317 День тому

      @@nicknack125 My coworker is always getting labsnacks. Extras when they ship one order in multiple packages.

    • @alexandermarsteller7848
      @alexandermarsteller7848 День тому +3

      A very common question in my past with photo diodes: Do I want to go through the pain to try to build an amplifier for this, or buy a good, working one? After one attempt, the latter answer is the default now 😅

    • @Qpwrtm
      @Qpwrtm 23 години тому +1

      @@alexandermarsteller7848sometimes available TIA don’t give you needed amplification-bandwidth ratio. Then you have to design your own haha

  • @robbie123robbie123
    @robbie123robbie123 9 годин тому +1

    Dude, you are flying at such a high level. Your problem solving abilities combined with your relentless determinatin make you inspiring to watch. I'm 20 a solution architect in the software engineering space and restire motorcyclea in my spare time and you make me feel like im not tapping my full potential, in the most motivating way. Kudos to you. Cheers from Australia 😊

  • @hipstersavage
    @hipstersavage День тому +229

    16:52 unironically would go super hard as an album cover

    • @aj383
      @aj383 День тому +23

      I was thinking that a lot of those images could look quite good as disc art!

    • @segfault-
      @segfault- День тому +10

      He was definitely onto something when he said these images "felt like art" it's basically an album cover machine

    • @scott_pilgrim
      @scott_pilgrim 21 годину тому +2

      18:32 too

    • @nabinnyc
      @nabinnyc 17 годин тому

      Either that or as CCTV footage of a serial killer in a Walmart.

    • @yommish
      @yommish 17 годин тому +1

      Would be cool as 12” label art, made me think of some of the labels for AFX - Analord

  • @Franch3ttz
    @Franch3ttz День тому +383

    Never clicked so fast

    • @Yellowsam4145
      @Yellowsam4145 День тому +1

      Same

    • @RekodeIt
      @RekodeIt День тому

      Back from work, sofa, open UA-cam, click first suggested video.

    • @ace1122tw
      @ace1122tw День тому

      dicked down

  • @BenniK88
    @BenniK88 19 годин тому +117

    That’s absolute insane. I work in the film industry and engineering and this it’s probably one of the most exciting thing in camera tech I’ve ever seen. I didn’t know it’s even possible to simulate lenses like this. Feels truly like a 3-D program. And even there I’ve only seen an autographic view not all the other crazy creative ideas. I can’t imagine how absolutely insane it would be to have this in high resolution with proper RGB read out. And then a proper photo campaign shot on it. Congratulations to this absolute insane achievement
    The only other absolute insane engineering. I’ve seen a few years ago, was a camera that’s basically reverse ray-tracing the light rays, and therefore can really look around corners and in other rooms without even being there. But seeing you engineering everything yourself from the software to the hardware and everything else is absolutely insane.
    After seeing your concept, I wonder if it’s possible to kind of use the same concept, if you have multiple images/photographs, undistort, account for their sensor size, and focal length and triangulate them, so you get their position in space, and then later, on the software side, fill in the blanks in kind of like a reproprojection setup to achieve basically the same as you did, but without having to have kind of like motion control rig. What’s what probably result in some that pixels probably could also work even though they’re not all on the same depth axes
    As a sidenote, it would be super interesting to know more about the hardware you used, I saw an Arduino but more insights about your tech stack and the math that’s making it possible would be super interesting

    • @MattH-wg7ou
      @MattH-wg7ou 18 годин тому +5

      It reminds me somehow of distributed aperture telescopes like the VLA Very Large Array. Maybe I'm off base but thats what I thought of.

    • @moosewithguns1134
      @moosewithguns1134 18 годин тому +3

      The idea of reverse ray-tracing light rays makes my head hurt

    • @DanielG-z8r
      @DanielG-z8r 16 годин тому +2

      all these lenses exist in a way that could be applied to a film camera, unlike this

    • @theShadeslayer
      @theShadeslayer 15 годин тому +3

      was the reverse raytracing another youtube video? I'd like to check that one out

    • @TPTurkey-x2i
      @TPTurkey-x2i 15 годин тому

      Things like this exist for applications like inspecting equipment or hard to reach places.

  • @itsJules8
    @itsJules8 12 годин тому +1

    Every project you do is just insanely great. I love everything about it. Keep it up !!

  • @michaelwagner8856
    @michaelwagner8856 23 години тому +18

    This is awesome, you should make an animation where you take a series of pictures with a progressively narrower field of view until it becomes orthographic then continue with a increasingly negative field of view. So you would start with being able to just see the cardboard then the card board would "shrink" eventually shrinking until it reveals the thing behind it.

  • @thomaskletzl6493
    @thomaskletzl6493 День тому +11

    I must really say i extremely appreciate that you let your projects be the star of the show. No extra hype or fancy showing it.
    Just the project, how its made and the engineering behind it.

  • @user-.--.-
    @user-.--.- 15 годин тому +59

    12:36 idk why, but i really like this one specifically. it feels like one of those captchas where they ask you to type the numbers but they're all squiggly

  • @purpshell
    @purpshell 3 години тому +1

    20:54 "I don't feel like I am making art on a digital camera". All your videos are art to me :D

  • @hclnet
    @hclnet День тому +10

    When you started describing this it immediately reminded me of things like mechanical tvs or the scanning cameras on satellites.There is a great video from Applied science where a similar effect is made with a big Fresnel lens. Making a scanner just rebuilds the lens one pixel at a time and that is so neat.

  • @JeffGeerling
    @JeffGeerling День тому +38

    5:24 - Pi 5: spotted!

    • @Jeff121456
      @Jeff121456 День тому +3

      I thought you had finally lost it looking at an Arduino Mega, then I spied the Pi 5 hidden behind.

    • @8bits59
      @8bits59 День тому +6

      He's got the whole US supply of them on that one camera :P

    • @JeffGeerling
      @JeffGeerling День тому +1

      @@Jeff121456 Haha I was like "there *has* to be some more grunt besides just an Arduino on there..."

  • @Fight2Survive559
    @Fight2Survive559 День тому +13

    The common don't have mentors to show us what lies past persistent effort... except for here. You and all of the educators / makers on UA-cam and other platforms bring the fear of failing into part of the process. You are an inspiration, man. Nothing but love towards you and those that support you. Keep it up.

  • @JordanRaj
    @JordanRaj 7 годин тому

    At 12:00 I actually out loud said "WOW!" that is amazing. Well done!

  • @antibrevity
    @antibrevity 21 годину тому +132

    Very cool. This isn't the first time you've built something complex enough that viewers might not be as impressed as they should be ;). You did a fine job of explaining the concept in 20 minutes, but you've obviously had to gloss over many of the image-building difficulties.
    This is an incredible camera and you've only shown us a few of things it can do; it's a virtual lens on a human-sized sensor. In a way, this reverses much of what digital sensors have been doing for decades; their pixels get smaller and their lenses focus light onto smaller areas to fit into more devices while your camera is a humongous sensor with large virtual pixels. Both strategies require software correction, but for different reasons.

    • @spaced5155
      @spaced5155 17 годин тому

      shut up mate stop yapping

  • @spencereaston8292
    @spencereaston8292 День тому +128

    11:20 was rough. I remember checking in a one line of code change after a week of debugging to have the boss ask me what I was doing all week. My soul was already broken and her question felt like a boot to the neck. Hang in there champ! You are doing good.

    • @privacyvalued4134
      @privacyvalued4134 День тому +26

      Nah. You should just find a new boss. Some bugs take a long time (weeks to months) to track down and are one-line fixes.

    • @joshd79
      @joshd79 День тому

      @@privacyvalued4134debugging is a skill you can improve. And one that should be taken into account for compensation…

    • @Houdini111
      @Houdini111 День тому +24

      @@privacyvalued4134 100%. There's a phrase usually used for repair people that's also relevant here. Don't remember the exact phrasing but it's basically "You don't pay $1000 to fix it, you pay me $100 to fix it and $900 for knowing how".
      Most people could do the same thing (literally just changing a character in a file) but most people also would have no idea how to find out what to change.

    • @SystemsPlanet
      @SystemsPlanet День тому

      If your bugs take weeks to find, find another profession

    • @SrKinko
      @SrKinko День тому +31

      ​@@SystemsPlanetYou're the guy writing all the bugs

  • @Lockwren
    @Lockwren День тому +88

    We need a spin off series of shorts called Stuff Made Here: Failure Diary.
    Around 11:35 you mention 'fixing all the issues', it'd be cool to get a look at a few of the problems you solved going over "What is supposed to happen", "What IS happening", "What you suspect is causing the issue", "What IS causing the issue", and what decisions or misunderstandings led you to having the issue in the first place.

    • @Merok23
      @Merok23 День тому +1

      yeah! wish he used 'stuff made here 2' more and for these things!

    • @StolenBlock
      @StolenBlock 23 години тому +5

      Yea i'm missing the old videos. Like, how is he blending the pixels/light readings? Is he making more readings on the outside. How is he supporting everything with electricity, why this focal length for his lens, how is the balancing weight moving past the sensor when he's in the middle. Is the gearshaft not fixed to the rotating pole, how is he unswirling the patterns or is he measuring where the readings were taken. Why is there a bulge in the photo and why is he not fixing it. Is he taking a reading on time intervals so he is moving faster inwards because there is less area to scan...... I want all his thoughts and prayers

    • @cranemon
      @cranemon 22 години тому +1

      Honestly, as a hobbyist programmer, debugging is just not very fun or interesting. Usually it's something really dumb and simple that you overlooked (like letting the electrical contacts touch by accident), and you go through countless iterations of getting the computer to spit out its data at intermediary steps to follow where it's going wrong. It's already confusing enough as the programmer to debug, and even more difficult to explain your thought process behind it. Most of it will just be fruitless "I spent 5 hours thinking in was a problem with X, when it was a problem with Y."

  • @robot_spider
    @robot_spider 6 годин тому +1

    Why do I feel like this is the kind of thing that will have the DoD knocking on your door in a few weeks? Unspeakably cool stuff. I would have written this off as "too many variables" really early on. Great work.

  • @solomarkgulo
    @solomarkgulo День тому +70

    12:09 "Who needs Drugs when you have engineering?" needs to be a motivational poster

    • @dj5t0rm
      @dj5t0rm День тому +1

      MERCH!

    • @Tmanaz480
      @Tmanaz480 22 години тому +1

      An Adam Savage T-shirt.

  • @franchiniitalo
    @franchiniitalo 18 годин тому +7

    The level of complexity in this project is out of this world! Genius!

  • @jckf
    @jckf День тому +41

    The concept of looking "around" something is actually the least interesting here. Any camera can do this if placed on a long stick like this machine. Everything else is really cool though, especially the elimination of perspective!

    • @tomadams7553
      @tomadams7553 18 годин тому +1

      The looking around is interesting because the photo looks like it's taken from a stationary point behind the cover.
      Sure, you could put the camera over the top of the cover, but it would be a picture from above.

    • @_Stormfather
      @_Stormfather 9 годин тому

      ​​@@tomadams7553this. I don't think he emphasized enough why this was such a big deal. It's not about what you're taking a picture of, it's about the impossible perspective you produce with the final image, which no other camera will be able to do

  • @_BangDroid_
    @_BangDroid_ 7 годин тому +3

    My phone camera can see behind walls too, I don't even use a rotating arm, I just use my own arm and move the whole thing to peek behind it. Other than the data stitching, it's almost the same.

    • @stupid4President
      @stupid4President 5 годин тому +1

      I thought the same.. what's all the fuss about? This project borders on over-engineering unless that was the point. Bit confused by this vid.

  • @potaatobaked7013
    @potaatobaked7013 День тому +17

    One thing that would be interesting to see from this is a photo with a different fov at each angle. Like it could be normal at the vertical but go through orthographic and end up at reverse perspective at the horizontal. Probably would just look like a mess, but it’s an interesting idea

  • @milest9754
    @milest9754 21 годину тому +73

    Have it take a picture of itself in the mirror
    What would it look like??

    • @EternalPending
      @EternalPending 19 годин тому +2

      The same, or you would see the lens always

    • @milest9754
      @milest9754 19 годин тому +5

      @@EternalPending yeah I think you’d see the camera blurred everywhere

    • @_Stormfather
      @_Stormfather 9 годин тому

      ​@@milest9754you wouldn't see it blurred, but you would see the camera arm in each position overlaid all on top of each other. Basically imagine the camera has ten thousand identical arms all around the circle, and it's not moving. That's what you'd see.

  • @AlexsProjects
    @AlexsProjects День тому +11

    I love that you share your passion with your family. Best content ever.❤

  • @crazykittenvideos855
    @crazykittenvideos855 10 годин тому

    It is always worth the wait!! When a Stuff Made Here video drops it is just a joy and this did not disappoint. Fantastic project, a great idea! Now you need to make a really big one!!

  • @SpaghettiRoad
    @SpaghettiRoad 18 годин тому +14

    This is absolutely amazing! Could you make a photo of a globe with the last “lense” you used? 🌎

  • @phoenixking339
    @phoenixking339 21 годину тому +12

    ~ 11:45 Hydra, not medusa.

  • @eliotmccann2589
    @eliotmccann2589 21 годину тому +32

    0:43 WIFE!!!

  • @JTCF
    @JTCF 9 годин тому +1

    I find it poetic that the first cameras required the photographed person to sit still for the medium to expose and you also need this here.
    I think moving as much components as possible off the rotating giant thing could yield a better photographing time.
    Although the max "peeking" radius is directly tied to the radius of the rotating structure. Still, I think that can be done with some clever mirror setups and mechanical linkages.

  • @lordmwa25
    @lordmwa25 День тому +24

    "It's a very weird camera" I'd be very disappointed on this channel if it wasn't...... 😂

  • @KAYDdubz
    @KAYDdubz День тому +4

    The way you explain things and the visualizations you use are otherworldly. You make extremely complex topics that I otherwise would assume I could never understand, very very digestible and easy to comprehend.

  • @AlphaPhoenixChannel
    @AlphaPhoenixChannel 18 годин тому +6

    So on one monitor I'm watching this video, on the other monitor python is rendering almost the same graphic that appears at 2:14 (not quite). Weirdo cameras are awesome. Looking forward to the rest of the video =)
    Edit: this was awesome! Is there going to be a sequel with more wacky lens emulation? I love this. How on earth did this last 23 minutes - felt like 3. I totally feel the "this is art now" sentiment going along with the difficulty of running the rig - Congrats!

    • @sdspecto
      @sdspecto 13 годин тому

      My other favorite creator that explains complex science topics!

  • @LukeMaximoBell1
    @LukeMaximoBell1 10 годин тому

    The perfect example of engineering and creativity combined!

  • @mstreich
    @mstreich День тому +15

    "Looks like I've seen some stuff." Yes, ma'am, you have seen some stuff. 22:27

  • @gabriyeldoll1502
    @gabriyeldoll1502 День тому +60

    "Who needs drugs when you have engineering" - 12:10

    • @jordanbradford7729
      @jordanbradford7729 День тому +1

      I’ve been chasing that high for twenty years in my career. 😂

    • @BoxOfSnoo
      @BoxOfSnoo День тому

      Yup I loved this line! It accurately captures the *euphoria of triumph* over an extremely challenging problem.

  • @pootyskills
    @pootyskills 15 годин тому +30

    The 'nonplussed wife' gag on this channel is what keeps me coming back. That and the stuff made here

  • @drjimmaine
    @drjimmaine 5 годин тому

    Amazing. I really appreciate that you discuss the problems, and time and effort you take to deal with them.

  • @biltrex
    @biltrex 16 годин тому +6

    I wonder... If you changed out the photodetector for a very, very directional radio receiver and maybe spun it more slowly... if you could take a radio-spectrum "photo" of a city? You've got the movement and the math.... all you need is a different type of signal receiver... Also, you'd have to lose the mirror and point the detector straight ahead. But... still... that could be pretty amazing.

  • @Armbrust210
    @Armbrust210 20 годин тому +9

    5:48 is gonna be the next Firefox Logo 🔥

  • @Ryan-xc4em
    @Ryan-xc4em День тому +54

    No way people find this video through the search bar

    • @lenOwOo
      @lenOwOo 7 годин тому +1

      Yeah, i didn't too

    • @nixdorfbrazil
      @nixdorfbrazil 3 години тому

      I did. I saw it a snippet on tiktok, then looked it up on YT using the search bar.

    • @AlvinWasHereRn
      @AlvinWasHereRn 3 години тому

      Actually searched for a guy that got split in half by speeding F1 race car.
      Got this guy instead.

  • @vladimirsch.3015
    @vladimirsch.3015 5 годин тому

    I really enjoy content like this. It's both entertaining and useful. Thanks for sharing your knowledge in such an enjoyable way!

  • @HeyV63
    @HeyV63 День тому +23

    Just a quick note at 14:18 a true orthographic projection is AWESOME in that you can measure anything in the picture and get accurate measurements off of it.
    To say it more clearly once you know the measure of one thing you can measure everything else, because everything else will be to perfect scale.

    • @Triggerboy78
      @Triggerboy78 День тому +1

      side note: only on x and y axis, but not on the z axis.

    • @ZPdrumer
      @ZPdrumer 21 годину тому

      Its called a telecentric lens, they're commonly used in manufacturing lines as part of quality control

    • @_Stormfather
      @_Stormfather 9 годин тому

      ​@@ZPdrumeryeah but how many telecentric lenses are this big? Genuine question because I really don't know, but I doubt there's many

  • @thomasmccauley65
    @thomasmccauley65 21 годину тому +9

    made some of the hardist song cover art I've ever seen.

  • @syntactyx
    @syntactyx День тому +11

    In the future, I would choose Shane with a bottle of Adderall as humanity's champion in defense against the machines.

  • @Trance_
    @Trance_ 6 годин тому

    Your determination in the face of multiple failures with trial and error is inspirational.
    11:50 "The thing I've learned over the years is that there's a finite number of issues. And eventually... it works."

  • @omahuvisoongaro1207
    @omahuvisoongaro1207 День тому +182

    So, you basically put a camera on a stick, which is long enough to look behind a small barier the same way you'd put a mirror on a stick to look aroud edges.

    • @FirstLast-gw5mg
      @FirstLast-gw5mg День тому +10

      It's kinda like a digital periscope.

    • @adrien5568
      @adrien5568 День тому +32

      He did, feels like cheating.

    • @nicholas4839
      @nicholas4839 День тому +19

      Was thinking the same thing if the camera sticks past the edge then it could see him and not seeing behind walls

    • @linnickschlanter4712
      @linnickschlanter4712 День тому +4

      Yeah, had the same feeling

    • @TheSupsnow
      @TheSupsnow День тому +33

      "This camera can see behind things when I put it where the thing isn't obstructing what's behind"

  • @RandomPerson-vz3lc
    @RandomPerson-vz3lc День тому +552

    the camera isn’t seeing behind the wall though, you are just reaching the camera around the wall

    • @1813boo
      @1813boo День тому +92

      Yeah it's cool but not really a camera that can look around walls...

    • @ForeverHobbit
      @ForeverHobbit День тому +108

      yeah, the camera is peeking around different corners and then creating a flat image by combining different sides of the subject of the photos into 1.
      I love his projects but this is just not what he says it does

    • @neb_setabed
      @neb_setabed День тому +33

      Like if I was to take a normal camera and put it at the same place as his sensor I could take a better picture

    • @robinhood4640
      @robinhood4640 День тому +42

      Thanks for saving me 20 minutes.
      The spinning arm was enough for me to doubt the claim.

    • @timothybradford8216
      @timothybradford8216 День тому +20

      @@neb_setabed His sensor is in thousands of places. It would take you a very long time to put a normal camera at the same place as his sensor. Especially accurately.

  • @HawksNestYT
    @HawksNestYT 10 годин тому

    I don’t know if it’s been done before, but that ortho/parrallel projection image is SO cool. I’ve done it in 3D software but seeing it’s actually done is mind warping literally

  • @ElliotMitchellR
    @ElliotMitchellR День тому +9

    @3blue1brown *creates an entire library to articulate physics on video*
    @StuffMadeHere proceeds to scribble on an ipad while recording

    • @multiarray2320
      @multiarray2320 День тому +6

      manim might be more visually pleasing, but doing it with an ipad is way faster and most of the time good enough to understand the concept.

    • @mehmetcaneksi8388
      @mehmetcaneksi8388 День тому

      @@multiarray2320 stuffmadehere actually builds the thing. that helps. if it were only a ipad drawing you wouldnt watch it probably :)
      love them both

  • @lukestoolbox
    @lukestoolbox День тому +12

    i bet by the end of next year we get to see a homemade MRI machine🫡

    • @grungko
      @grungko День тому +1

      "I asked my wife to see what my interior looks like"
      "Looks like a crab."

  • @Mike-B-Jackson
    @Mike-B-Jackson День тому +13

    14:00 - MIND. BLOWN. Never seen anything like this! Never even imagined it would be possible. This is cool!
    The funny thing is, the "seeing around objects" stuff at 16:30 is somehow less impressive, as you could really just move any old camera around the object without needing to spin it. But the no-perspective images are so unlike anything our eyes could ever see. I'm seriously impressed!

  • @kevinshu2683
    @kevinshu2683 13 годин тому

    As a mech eng. student, I can't stress how cool this is, We just our 2nd year class on sensors and instrumentation and our prof. spoke our heads off on how Impedance amplifiers and active filters work and when you showed a use case for it finally clicked for me (haha, no offence, he was a great prof). I find that eng. students like me often face the struggle of find a project like this to work on. I think the most inspiring thing about this is your ability to take ideas like this and turn them into a crazy-creative project. Definitely kickstarted my brain to try and finding awesome project ideas like this!

  • @scrubz_dev
    @scrubz_dev День тому +4

    Something cool to try would be to use the full censor of the camera, instead of just a point, save all of the images that it takes, and reconstruct the photo afterwards to use whatever lens / FOV you want.
    Awesome video as always!!

    • @9000ft
      @9000ft День тому

      I think that could work.

    • @heartofdawn2341
      @heartofdawn2341 День тому

      Light Field Cameras can do this already, but it would be interesting as none of them are anywhere near this big.

  • @CthulhusDream
    @CthulhusDream День тому +19

    11:42 I think you mean "hydra whack-a-mole" the hydra was the mythological creature that grew 2 new heads every time you cut one off, Medusa was the gorgon that had snakes for hair and turned you to stone if you looked at her.

    • @loganlyons1634
      @loganlyons1634 День тому

      Exactly what I thought when I heard that

    • @yoitszaitz
      @yoitszaitz 22 години тому

      I could be wrong i have not bothered fact checking, but dont medusa's snakes have the same property of kill one, two grow in its place? I did think the same thing at first tho which is how i found this comment

    • @CthulhusDream
      @CthulhusDream 21 годину тому

      @@yoitszaitz That I something I have never heard before, and if it is true it'd be so obscure as to not be a reference anyone would understand as "correct" when the more obvious cutting off heads and multiplying schtick Greek monster is the hydra.

    • @yoitszaitz
      @yoitszaitz 21 годину тому

      @CthulhusDream yeah i just fact checked myself and found nothing, idk where i heard it before

  • @HoldYourSeahorses
    @HoldYourSeahorses День тому +21

    “You kinda look like Thomas the Tank.” The rizz is strong in this one.

  • @blobooger
    @blobooger 14 годин тому

    as a filmmaker and camera assistant, I find this mind blowing, and a fantastic demonstration of the capabilities and functionality of what I work with. Gives me a better perspective, thank you.

  • @timwildauer5063
    @timwildauer5063 День тому +51

    There actually are cameras that see around corners. They measure the time it takes photons to bounce off a wall, hit the object, off the wall again, and then hit the detector. Then with tons of math you can get the general shape of an object that’s occluded. The Smithsonian Magazine has an article about it from 2012 if anyone is interested.

    • @steveb0503
      @steveb0503 День тому +7

      I was going to bring this up - it's an interesting ability that emerged out of the research methodology referred to as "femtophotography".

    • @Mismatch-
      @Mismatch- День тому +6

      I thought that this was kinda what he was going to do, cuz what he did doesn't really see "behind" the wall, the sensor just looks above/around it. I mean, it's still cool, but I wouldn't call it "seeing behind a wall".

    • @Gnaaal
      @Gnaaal 22 години тому +1

      While my amped up engineering senses think this is awesome, this is more like a fancy way of using a wall as a temporal mirror. I mean still freaking awesome, but kind of still cheating in a way :)
      We need really small black holes to really "see around corners". Oh, and also really strong walls.

    • @_Stormfather
      @_Stormfather 9 годин тому

      ​@@Mismatch-it's better than seeing behind it. It's seeing _through_ it, because the perspective is from a point that is directly blocked by the obstruction

  • @andreasboye7627
    @andreasboye7627 День тому +8

    great video, but a small correction for 17:40 Most cameras only have a single sensor per pixel, and on top of the sensor there is RGB Bayer pattern applied, meaning only some pixel see red, some green and some see blue. The final image is an interpolation of the data from each filter.

  • @alextheferret5674
    @alextheferret5674 День тому +7

    21:11 that is an alpaca

    • @jiroy1234_
      @jiroy1234_ 7 годин тому

      using my minecraft knowledge, that is a camel

  • @cornevanzyl5880
    @cornevanzyl5880 11 годин тому

    Your results are insanely good. I am in awe of your drive every time you post a video.

  • @wormius51
    @wormius51 День тому +21

    11:39 Did you mean Hydra? Medusa turns you into stone, doesn't grow more heads.

    • @deadlata9767
      @deadlata9767 20 годин тому +1

      Good way to bait insufferable people to get them to comment and boost the algorithm. He got himself a good haul looking through the replies.

    • @praiseafrogtoday
      @praiseafrogtoday 20 годин тому

      i was gonna say that 😭

  • @slinkytreekreeper
    @slinkytreekreeper 22 години тому +17

    Everything apart from the looking round objects bit was stunning. Camera on a stick can look round stuff regardless.
    The reverse and Orthographic stuff is mind bending, being able to create custom lenses is freaking nuts!

    • @_Stormfather
      @_Stormfather 9 годин тому

      Camera on a stick can look around things, but this is the only camera that can look around things with a perspective that looks like you're looking directly _through_ the obstruction. Notice how he's centered in the image, and you're not looking at him from the side. No other camera can do that.

  • @vedantgupta2145
    @vedantgupta2145 День тому +7

    Cant even imagine how huge of a headache this was to make 😂

  • @PhilipLeichauer
    @PhilipLeichauer 12 годин тому +1

    Love the camera :)
    Your optics are diffraction-limited, so if acting as a conventional lens, a touch of super-resolution should be trivial. This is essentially accomplished by deconvolving the image with the point spread function.
    But... for the Orthographic Photo, the point spread function depends on distance. So wherever you have contrast the point spread function can be detected and the distance can be calculated. So in short, you have a depth camera that can detect the distance of edges. That image would be awesome.
    To detect the point spread is relatively easy - it's a Gauss function with height proportional to the Laplacian of the image.