If Russia has all this equipment, it should have been easy to overrun Ukraine. I dont get it, why they are fighting for two years now? Either Russia does not have all this equipment or something else is going on.
Its because their problem is strategy. They didnt consolidate their gains, didnt significantly bomb enemy targets, sent giant unprotected convoys into enemy territory and more. Also, they didnt expect the west to send advanced equipment to Ukraine in the 1st week
@deaghostyt2217 you said the sent advanced weapons in the first week ... That's not true the west had sent those weapons years before invasion and Russia would have known javelin and stinger were in ukraine when they invaded .. The miscalculation was that they expected the ukraine military to surrender and not fight . Putin thought it would be another crimea and over in a week .
No they wouldnt, sorry to say that but EU has less than 2 million soldiers, Russia on the other hand counting reservists has the same amouth if not more, EU might have higher military budget but we dont produce, we cant, our former military factories are inactive and it would take years to start producing again in large amouths, Russia on the other hand has many military factories since world war and most of the soviet former tanks like t72s are being modernised to t72b3/b3m which are better than first t90s, they can produce more ammo than whole EU which was their goal since early 2000s, in fact if Germany, France and UK combined tried to outproduce Russia it would take them maybe 5-8 years but probably even more, we rellied too much in the US, and Europe wouldnt allow Germany to arm itself again, our armies are only suitable to hold uprisings in africa against unequipped armies, we fought only against enemies in sandals with AK47s, our soldiers are not experienced to right against someone equal/more advanced
@@adamoleksak3528 EU has a population of nearly 450 million people and a much larger economy. EU has also a much higher technology level than Russia. Russia have big trouble in Ukraina and Poland alone is much stronger than Ukraine. Wake up.
That's not entirely true, in the event of an attack there is a treaty in the EU that is even stricter than in NATO. If one country is attacked, every country has to help militarily, that's not the case in NATO.
@@bjorndebar8361 Je n'ai pas la traduction en français mais j'ai à peu près compris votre réponse, oui vous avez raison sur le plan du droit européen mais je pensais plus à la motivation des combattants , les capacités d'organisation , s'accorder sur une stratégie commune , en bref réussir une cohésion efficace des 27 pays de l' UE , on a déjà vu dans le passé des batailles gagnées d'avance par une supériorité théorique écrasante et finir par la victoire de David contre Goliath. La Russie n'est certes pas invincible mais ça n'est pas gagné d'avance
@@roucy9023 You are right, but I still believe that with a population of almost 500 million people in the EU, there are enough people who are motivated if Finland or the Ballticum is attacked, but you are right, there is still a lot of work ahead of us. We would have no other choice, or do you want to have a king named Putin, it is motivation enough for me to prevent that.
@@bjorndebar8361 Si la Russie attaque un membre de l' OTAN je suis d'accord avec vous et avec ou sans Trump les États-Unis interviendront et l'issu de la guerre ne fait aucun doute , mais si on ne considère que l'Ukraine et la Moldavie c'est plus compliqué, je pense qu'un militaire portugais ou grec serait motivé pour défendre les baltes et les scandives mais pas forcément l'Ukraine et la Moldavie , surtout si les cercueils reviennent par milliers, et si vous ajoutez les problèmes économiques les opinions publiques des différents pays européens risquent de se lasser très vite , en tous cas c'est ce que je crois
![[Premiere] Russia vs Ukraine - Military Social Ads Comparison (with English translation)](/img/n.gif)
we stand with Europe
I don't think we need the help of the US if they leave the NATO.
The more united the European Union is, the more democracy there is in the world. Europe needs to increase its weaponry equipment early.
EUROPEAN❤❤❤❤
🇪🇸🇪🇺💪🏼
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
@@abdillr17 🇵🇸❤️. 🇷🇺🤮
🇪🇺🇪🇦🏳️🌈🤡🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮
🇷🇺😎>>>>>>>>>>>>🇪🇦🏳️🌈🇪🇺🤮
There's an important difference between a "petrol vessel" and a "patrol vessel"...
EU STRONGER❤
Bro is happy when 27 countries are weaker than 1 country RUSSIA. Russia stronger than all little b*tches 🇷🇺🇷🇺💪💪
Support EU from South Korea 🇰🇷❤️🇪🇺
Support Russia from China 🇨🇳❤️🇷🇺
If Russia has all this equipment, it should have been easy to overrun Ukraine.
I dont get it, why they are fighting for two years now?
Either Russia does not have all this equipment or something else is going on.
Its because their problem is strategy. They didnt consolidate their gains, didnt significantly bomb enemy targets, sent giant unprotected convoys into enemy territory and more. Also, they didnt expect the west to send advanced equipment to Ukraine in the 1st week
@@deaghostyt2217ummm the west didn't sent much in the first week in fact no real heavy aid was sent for months
@@mikedon5205 nope. Javelins saved Ukraine during the battle of Kiev
@deaghostyt2217 the only weapons the west sent were javelins and long before the invasion but no heavy equipment made its way to ukraine for months
@deaghostyt2217 you said the sent advanced weapons in the first week ...
That's not true the west had sent those weapons years before invasion and Russia would have known javelin and stinger were in ukraine when they invaded ..
The miscalculation was that they expected the ukraine military to surrender and not fight .
Putin thought it would be another crimea and over in a week .
Uk or France could beat Russia by themshelves
No they wouldnt, sorry to say that but EU has less than 2 million soldiers, Russia on the other hand counting reservists has the same amouth if not more, EU might have higher military budget but we dont produce, we cant, our former military factories are inactive and it would take years to start producing again in large amouths, Russia on the other hand has many military factories since world war and most of the soviet former tanks like t72s are being modernised to t72b3/b3m which are better than first t90s, they can produce more ammo than whole EU which was their goal since early 2000s, in fact if Germany, France and UK combined tried to outproduce Russia it would take them maybe 5-8 years but probably even more, we rellied too much in the US, and Europe wouldnt allow Germany to arm itself again, our armies are only suitable to hold uprisings in africa against unequipped armies, we fought only against enemies in sandals with AK47s, our soldiers are not experienced to right against someone equal/more advanced
@@adamoleksak3528It is your opinión, but not the realitu
@@Z___________439 Russian bots are worst
🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺URAAAAAA@@javim3389
@@adamoleksak3528 EU has a population of nearly 450 million people and a much larger economy. EU has also a much higher technology level than Russia. Russia have big trouble in Ukraina and Poland alone is much stronger than Ukraine. Wake up.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤evropa🎉🎉🎉🎉
Eu or nr russia yudh koro jo jitega usko nobel prize milega
Russian have more vehicles than personel lol
Eu have better trained soilders and better equipment
As it states it’s the EU MILITARY maybe they should state EU + UK. AND INCLUDE THE UK EQUIPMENT ETC.
" N O W A R _ N O W A R "
YURTTA SULH CİHANDA SULH......
GAZİ MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK.......
TÜRKİYE CUMHURİYETİ..........
'Promosm' 😒
Russia ❤❤
Uraaaaaa🇷🇺
Ca n'est pas comparable l' UE n'est pas un état
That's not entirely true, in the event of an attack there is a treaty in the EU that is even stricter than in NATO. If one country is attacked, every country has to help militarily, that's not the case in NATO.
Article 42, paragraph 7
@@bjorndebar8361
Je n'ai pas la traduction en français mais j'ai à peu près compris votre réponse, oui vous avez raison sur le plan du droit européen mais je pensais plus à la motivation des combattants , les capacités d'organisation , s'accorder sur une stratégie commune , en bref réussir une cohésion efficace des 27 pays de l' UE , on a déjà vu dans le passé des batailles gagnées d'avance par une supériorité théorique écrasante et finir par la victoire de David contre Goliath. La Russie n'est certes pas invincible mais ça n'est pas gagné d'avance
@@roucy9023 You are right, but I still believe that with a population of almost 500 million people in the EU, there are enough people who are motivated if Finland or the Ballticum is attacked, but you are right, there is still a lot of work ahead of us. We would have no other choice, or do you want to have a king named Putin, it is motivation enough for me to prevent that.
@@bjorndebar8361 Si la Russie attaque un membre de l' OTAN je suis d'accord avec vous et avec ou sans Trump les États-Unis interviendront et l'issu de la guerre ne fait aucun doute , mais si on ne considère que l'Ukraine et la Moldavie c'est plus compliqué, je pense qu'un militaire portugais ou grec serait motivé pour défendre les baltes et les scandives mais pas forcément l'Ukraine et la Moldavie , surtout si les cercueils reviennent par milliers, et si vous ajoutez les problèmes économiques les opinions publiques des différents pays européens risquent de se lasser très vite , en tous cas c'est ce que je crois
Full support Russia 🇷🇺 ❤
Love from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
🇪🇺🇪🇺🇪🇺
Russia 🇷🇺 with love ❤️
From Russia with shit , Like united Shit of America.....
Cambia mestiere i tuoi dati non sono corretti 😂😂😂
Russia❤❤❤