UK Bad Drivers & Driving Fails Compilation | UK Car Crashes Dashcam Caught (w/ Commentary) #79
Вставка
- Опубліковано 22 жов 2024
- ⭐This video featuring driving fails, instant karma, close call, road rage, hit and run, car crashes, good drivers, bad drivers, and many more... This video can be utilized as a learning tool, so the viewers can learn from other mistakes, not their own.
*Driving safely should be your number one concern behind the wheel. Following these defensive driving tips from our videos to improve your own road safety.
⭐Ruby Dashcam Academy provides actual footage of road incidents captured on dash cams. There's a story-line & our own unique contributions (TEXT COMMENTARY & VOICE-OVER) throughout the video. We have also added the special editing effects, trimming, zooming, etc with the footage throughout the compilation. This whole process required our 3-5 days for producing a video.
⭐These videos with own unique contributions can be used as an educational and informative resource for viewers to analyze and evaluate situations, stay alert and get out of a potentially dangerous situation on the road in the future.
⭐Visit our official website for defensive driving tips: rubydashcamaca...
⭐ALL VIDEOS USED WITH LICENSING AGREEMENT FROM COPYRIGHT OWNER!
If we made a mistake or you just want to remove your clip, please let us know here: hannahbruntnell114@gmail.com
⭐Submit your clip for the feature here: rubydashcamaca...
---------
Thank you for watching and stay safe!
#ukdashcam #ukcarcrashes #baddrivers #drivingfails
The lorry driver picking up the debris after the mobile crane hit the traffic light was, in fact, carrying the ballast for said crane. He's probably dying laughing at his colleague. 5:18
Many years ago a very large, multi-wheeled trailer (96 wheels IIRC) and pulled by a Scania heavy-haulage tractor visited the factory that I worked at, to move a 140 tonne gas-turbine powered, 24MW generator set. A couple of weeks later it was back to move the second unit, but demolished the traffic lights at the end of the road when turning in - the council, ignoring that we sent out more than 50 oversized loads per year and had 500+ people working there, had re-laid out the junction, making it impossible oversized vehicles to get around without hitting the lights!
judge was an audi driver
Are the TT really Audi or just a VW Golf with a body mod? Either way a hairdressers car
Another incorrect commenter that believes the lies the cammer wrote. Don't change lanes in a roundabout, simple really, like those that believe him.
@@johnt.848 The cammer didn't change lanes.The Audi did.
@@justjay3890 Audi driver are we?
Don't know if I'd be driving so closely behind that swaying trailer full of straw bales in that first clip.
I know I wouldn't.
i would have baled out
Yes, the trailer was clearly overloaded, I thought we were in India for a mo !
No 14: The judge was clearly part of the Audi Drivers' Alliance. If NOT being clairvoyant makes you 75% to blame, there's no hope for any of us...
Yep, Red Audi driver clearly at fault, as a cyclist that driver should be holding back as an HGV is allowed to cross lanes on roundabouts due to their size when turning also being too close will mean you be in the driver blind spot not smart
Clearly the judge is either an Audi driver or has never seen the stupidity of Audi drivers. So all vehicles with limited visibility should take responsibility for the actions of vehicles with superior visibility that can easily spot something ten times bigger than their puny dick of a car.
@@insoft_uk I thought it was the Audi's fault at first, (it usually is) but I watched it a few times.
I could be wrong but it looks to me like the lorry is waiting at the roundabout in the right hand lane, the Audi is in the middle lane.
They enter the roundabout and the lorry moves left in to the middle lane onto the Audi, making it the lorry's fault.
Whenever I've driven lorries I've spent more time looking in the mirrors than looking straight ahead, this driver doesn't seem to check them much. If I was in the Audi though I would have stuck my foot down and got away from the lorry as soon as the lights went green.
@@Ian-ww6mf No... the lorry driver is absolutely obeying the signs and road markings correctly.
The left lane at the lights takes the A34 exit.
The middle lane at the lights, after the A34 exit, becomes the left lane, which is for M3 North. This is the lane the Audi was in.
The right lane at the lights then becomes the middle lane (or right lane) for M3 South.
@@sw8296 You are correct, the lorry was in the right hand lane, the Audi was in the middle lane.
The lorry then moved in to the middle lane that the Audi was in.
By any definition that is not "obeying the signs and road markings correctly".
If the lorry hadn't moved over in to the lane the Audi was occupying they would never have come together.
Of course we change lanes all the time but it has to be done safely, which the lorry driver failed to do.
I'm not talking totally out of my backside, I used to be an HGV instructor.
#JusticeForDaryll That Audi was clearly in the wrong and so was that judge.
#15 - you have to feel for the lorry driver - the Audi effectively drove into him, it is not as if the lorry is small.
totally. the court basically said he should have anticipated the audi driver would be a typical audi driver which gives them an excuse to keep being fucking awful.
@@gdwnet Yeah, it makes no sense. You did everything correctly but didn’t anticipate someone else being a moron and you’re to blame? Seems crooked if ever i heard crooked, id defiantly appeal in that case. No way it would hold up, judge was clearly very biased here for some reason.
As a lorry driver myself, these types of accidents are inevitable in these sort of situations and are massively frustrating when people can't work out which lanes to use. However, i'm afraid the lorry driver did himself no favours, as he never bothered to check his mirrors - before starting off or whilst on the move, possibly why the courts went in favour of the car driver.
I assume you mean clip 14. The thing is that the cammer moves into the lane with the Audi in it so that’s why it’s the LGV driver’s fault regardless of who’s in the right lane. I am a class 2 driver and I certainly would be expecting faster traffic coming from my left if I was in the right (hand) lane. I’d also be checking my left mirrors to get myself over to the left side as soon as possible that would include the kerb view mirror. I don’t know why the cammer is in the right lane going into the right side of a three lane roundabout before cutting back into the middle lane but that’s just me and I honestly and obviously don’t know the circumstances or the area it happened. The best thing my LGV instructor told me was to be assertive but generally to let all the other traffic do what it’s doing when possible. The right lane is the last place I’d want to be and that seems the same for this driver, unfortunately he needs to check all the mirrors I’d be 50/50 mirrors and looking ahead. Shame this incident has shaken that driver so much as to quit the industry.
@@steveblick168You dont see his Head when the Video start so thats Speculating, also he did look in the Mirrlr at 7:23
#14 I'm not a big vehicle driver but, that seems insane to me that it was his fault?? Is this the norm when it comes down to accidents that involves large vehicles? They're blamed because they didn't anticipate someone not driving properly ?
I have known similar situations, the lorry driver probably wasn't held at fault more that he wasn't able to claim from the other driver. One guy in a truck who was hit at a roundabout by a red light runner was asked 'have you ever seen anyone else run that light?' when he said 'yes, a few times' then the judge decided his lack of anticipation contributed to the accident and was therefore not able to claim off the other driver. It's madness, really, but in the same situation be very careful how you answer questions.
Should get lawyer and an expert witness (to confirm you can’t see them) and take it to the court of appeals.
Actually watching it again, the red Audi is alongside the lorry at the lights (you can see it in the lorry's wing mirror) and it was the lorry driver who moved from the right hand lane to the middle lane where the Audi was. Car drivers should learn never to sit alongside large vehicles as they do not have great rearward visibility. In this case the red Audi should've accelerated in front of the lorry to get out of it's way.
Yeah the lorry looked to be in the far right lane at the lights on a 3 lane junction. Then decided to move over to the middle lane and cut off the audi. So clearly the lorry driver fault this one.
@@shaunmaloney9646 The left lane of the 3 was left turn only, as the recap video at the end of their clip shows. The middle lane became the left hand lane on the roundabout after that turn off, and the right lane became the middle lane. The lorry didn't "decide to move over" they followed the lane for their route correctly.
If we all go to court and get asked "have you ever seen an Audi driver doing something stupid before?" and then get penalised for not anticipating that they are likely to do something stupid then they really will own the road like a large number of them already think they do!
#14 Makes me scratch my head. I can only assume the judge is an Audi driver, or his wife ran off with an HGV driver?
#11's thoughtful HGV driver was carrying the weight blocks for the crane, least he could do to be honest
Driver of a crane would not even see that he damaged anything while making turn.
@ukaszjurys2475 That crane truck is left-hand drive, so the driver would have a good view of it in his wing mirror.
@@MiguelSantini19-57 He was not even watching his side.Mirror probably too small to see top of the rear end.Though driver from second truck would have tell him and they would both go without informing the police about situation
@ukaszjurys2475 How do you know the driver didn't check his wing mirror, and how do you know the other driver spoke to the crane driver, and they both decided not to inform the police?
#6 Camera truck is completely in the wrong. There's even a massive arrow on the road showing the red car took the correct path.
My thought exactly
Yes 100% correct. I go past here every day and at times both lanes are full coming off the A45 here.
Where the car came off the lane changes on the A45 to give you the option to exit the A45 here. At no point is there anything to say the the left exit lane splits off into 2 lanes. If a driver switches lane here from the left it is clearly a case of checking nobody is exiting the A45 in that lane.
Every day i see drivers just drift from the left into the other lane thinking the left lane turns into a second lane.
It's really poor lane marking... Going up to the junction only the left lane is leaving according to road signs. At the junction, there is an exit arrow suggesting it's ok to leave from lane two, despite previous markings. Seems to be a Northampton thing, as same as it is the same as A428 exit as well... Bottom line is both drivers are changing lanes, and both could be equally at fault given the markings...
Abysmal markings. IMPO red car should give way as crossing markings whilst the cammer isn’t.
@@pcr8918As much as I hate to say it, you're wrong. That lane is solely for traffic leaving the motorway, and the cam truck is changing lanes. I have seen other identical setups elsewhere too. It's a poor layout, but the truck with the camera is definitely in the wrong.
#11 the lorry driver who picked the debris up was travelling with the crane. He had the rigger mats and ballast on the trailer
clip #14 is at Winnall in Winchester M3/A34 junction 9 for those that don't know it. I used to use that route every working day and that happens all the time. The countless times it happened to me, I became wise to it. It's a very poor road layout anyway. Having to get from lane 3 to lane 2 on a roundabout in about 30 yards is ridiculous. They should change it so that lanes 2 and 3 entering the roundabout stay as lanes 2 and 3 at the next set of lights for the M3 south, but these road planners think they know best
Yep im down there all the time in the truck, never used the right lane though as its clear that you can use the middle lane and avoid this drama alltogether.
The signage is terrible there. The Lorry and Audi joined from Easton lane where a sign states M3S is right hand lane only, middle lane is M3N. Once on the roundabout, it changes to left lane is M3N and middle and right lanes are M3S. Lorry drivers heading to the M3S should be then in the middle lane to allow faster moving vehicles to be in the right lane. If only the person who designed this mad layout actually drove vehicles, many accidents could be prevented.
Didn't anticipate the Audi driver? No one can anticipate anything an Audi driver does. They have their own rules after all 😂
#8, if only there was someone there to arrest the driver for dangerous driving, firstly turning left and cutting in front of a car from the middle of the road, and secondly crashing into the barrier after the turn
I think he may have hit the car waiting at the junction to pull out as well.
And no blues until after the turn.
the driver who was a drunk teenager was arrested at the scene
@@georgebarnes8163oh, it wasn’t an officer?
No, the cop car was stolen.@@Whydidmyhandlechange414
3:00 Lukasz is a flipping liability! Didn't he cause a couple of crashes in the last video? It's perfectly fine for the red Qashqai to exit in to that lane, it's literally signed on the road! What on earth was Lukasz thinking?!
I'd argue that's debatable. Lukasz was in the correct lane and his lane was splitting into two lanes, where he continued in the right hand lane. While there was an arrow for the red car that also meant they had to change lane, as their lane went straight on. I'd say that's at least a 50:50, as the car changing lane has to make sure the lane is clear before moving.
@@ArminGrewe This junction is near me and I know it very well, the red QQ driver did nothing wrong. Lukasz's lane did not split, it's clearly marked that it's for traffic in lane 2 as the dashed lines go right back to the junction and there's a massive left arrow! Every time I use this junction, vehicles are doing exactly what the red QQ did.
@@shm5547 i would say you have no brain, my brain is very close to me. Red car change lane or you are blind?
@@ArminGrewe the lorry was the one that should be looking to see if the lane is clear. the red car didnt come out of nowhere. it was always on the lorrys offside and was indicating to exit the motorway. Lukasz would have seen this if they had bothered to check their mirrors before moving.
I know what he was thinking. Pierdole. Basically.
#8 Impeccable driving from a “professional” driver, performing a safe overtake in wet conditions and then full stop having encountered an obstruction. All jokes aside the driver should be reported for driving without due care and attention (due to the lack of care for other road users) and dangerous driving. At least they can’t be charged with failing to stop hahaha
Police officers are not professional drivers, a professional driver is someone who gets paid to drive.
There are even distinctions in regards to insurance as to what constitutes professional driving and driving as part of your job.
The cop car was stolen driven by a drunk teenager not a professional driver
I think he had some explaining to do back at the station.
My biggest question is why hasn’t the cammer stopped? They should have stopped and held position before the junction when seeing and hearing the police vehicle to give it options. The cammer moving is one of the many causes of the incident.
blues are on and all, could easily have been trying to respond to a stabbing, or someone literally dying. Did he fuck up? yeah sure, but saying "should be reported for driving without due care and attention" is so fucking reductive it's unreal. People get pissed when the police do their job and pissed when they don't, it's a lose lose for the average bloke on the beat.
#14 As a truck driver of 36 years no way would I be accepting any blame for that bullshit.
#3 a muted video pointing out 2 drivers were shouting at each other, they walk amongst us 😂
That jag at the end is a legendary clip 😂
3:32, it's because he's a taxi driver and believes he isn't subject to the same rules. That's one that needs sending to his Licensing Authority; conclusive proof of wrongdoing isn't necessary to them - but a welcome bonus when it's there!
3:05 totally the lorry drivers fault. Guess the massive white arrow on the road was in his blind spot when he decided to cut into the other lane
#1 Personally I'd have dropped back a bit. Those hay bales might look soft and fluffy but they weigh close to a ton and will, at best, write your vehicle off if it hits you and at worst crumple your roof like a tin can. I saw one roll off the top stack of a trailer and onto a (thankfully empty) defender once and it crushed the entire cabin down to the seats, if you didn't die instantly I don't reckon you'd have long left by the time the fire brigade had cut you out.
Maybe the drivers kid has a rabbit.....
#9, an alternative reading is you made it difficult for him to merge back in as you didn’t like being overtaken, then he had to brake as you left him no room to the car in front so he had to make reasonable room or he’d be in the back of them.
#9, initially it's a solid double white line, not to be crossed.
You'd anticipate those attempting to merge in front would judge accordingly, if it's not possible to drop back, not continue over solid double whites.
The expectation with an overtake is for a safe place to re-enter the lane, not bully your way in.
It can be argued the ford made a massive mistake but you'd typically see some degree of confidence in re-entering the lane assuming the individual can drive, additionally, you'd anticipate some gentleness to the braking, to gradually increase distance rather than getting a bit sharp causing alarm and inconvenience to the one immediately behind and those further behind.
To sum it up, the ford's a massive cock, the dashcammer could've done with a touch more understanding and increasing his following distance due to the fords inability to predict and drive.
@@britishcadet the Ford does start the overtake too early, which is a mistake, but the “lack of confidence” and “sharp braking ar E because the cammer doesn’t give them a big enough gap. Of course they “lack confidence” coming back in as the cammer is right on the back corner of their car, probably in their blind spot. The cammer isn’t giving them sufficient room to come back in (which is against the Highway Code) and the Ford has no option but to break more sharply.
The Fords manoeuvre isnt good, they should have been more patient, but the cammer is also at fault here.
#6 you’re in the wrong and the amount of people who think they can do what you did is amazing.
The road signs before that junction make it pretty clear what lane you’re supposed to be in.
You just cut the car up.
Yes he did, there was no need to change lanes.
4:40 #9. When you realized what was happening, slowing right down to let them in would have avoided any problems.
#14 truck driver went from the outside to middle and cut him up in the red car. Sorry,I normally back the hgv drivers but you definitely messed up!
Love that emergency stopping action by the police car - I believe it was a "pole stop"....
P.S. Does that judge own an Audi.
Amazes me some people that want to brake check an HGV.
The type of person who goes home at the end of every day to extract every little piece of imperfect driving captured in their dashcam to upload to UA-cam is a very sad person. To post every little "he got too close", "she didn't indicate" and "he's speeding" clip online is just ridiculous. Welcome to driving in the real world!
number 12 at last someone that obeys the rules of a box junction, well done young man/woman/thing/ it/ them
7.03 Something very similar to this happened to my missus. She was going straight on at a four lane round about, when a woman next to her (one her left) decided she wanted to take the third exit (a right turn). The wife's insurance said that it was "pressing for a cases of both at fault 50/50, as my missus should have 'anticipated the woman on her left would turn right".
3:06 the guy on the red car is in no transgression. arrows in the pavement say that lane can go front or left
Just because there is an arrow saying you can change lanes doesn't mean you can if that lane is already occupied.
The lane didn’t even exist before they met
@@BrunoLopes-lc9kw the red car is changing lanes without checking if the lane is free. The cammer is continuing on a lane that's splitting into two. Bad driving by both, but most of the fault I'd say on the red car for an unsafe lane change
@@BrunoLopes-lc9kw Indeed hence they both should have made sure it was empty before going into it, arrow or no arrow
@@ditch3827 Yes, defensive driving is good, but the cammer is still at fault. if you are changing lanes on a sliproad, especially as early as the cammer did, then you should check for traffic that is also exiting. He didnt look. Thats inexcusable, especially driving a vehicle that large.
Awful maneuver from the police car at 3:40, should have held off a little…but could the cammer be guilty of not being aware of the blue lights there too? Continuing at the same pace until turning left instead of slowing down and allowing the police to get past safely?
I looks like they did slow a bit. Maybe for the turn but it's hard to tell. It's also hard to spot which way a police car with all the flashies in is indicating. Little orange light gets lots in the christmas tree. Made worse by the conditions. Last point, I believe that emergency services are under obligation to drive safely before all other actions, and should have received additional training on the subject.
He should have pulled over and then maybe the police wouldn't have felt the need to race around him and beat him to the corner in the rain. Poor driving by cop, clueless driving by cammer.
@@markgambrill you're spot on with what you're saying, couldn't agree more. I don't think the cammer was aware of the police car until it was in front of them though, which made the corner a lot tighter for the police than it could have been. But yes, very poor maneuver from someone who should be a highly trained driver.
@@bestintheworld568 the driver was a drunk teenager who had stolen the car, he was arrested at the scene
@@georgebarnes8163really? If that’s the case then maybe the channel should do a bit more research on the clip and explain that.
3:41 When you know the laws of the land, but not the laws of physics
At 5:28 is the result of road design experts still using the Morris Minor as the standard for lane width. They also did the same near my home such that the buses demolished the bollards. The lanes were then widened.
7:15 - In what world was that the lorry drivers fault?
His positioning was perfect all the way through. The Audi driver tried to enter his lane and took no action when they saw a HGV getting closer to his face. The driver is so stupid they even decided to pull off on a sliproad entrance to a motorway.
Apparently this sort of thing is a big issue and something that causes a lot of lorry drivers to leave. Apparently there's always somebody penalising them for random crap.
Hierarchy of Road Users. Highway Code Rule H1 "Everyone suffers when road collisions occur, whether they are physically injured or not. But those in charge of vehicles that can cause the greatest harm in the event of a collision bear the greatest responsibility to take care and reduce the danger they pose to others". Basically you are fucked if you are a HGV driver and could anticipate there may be a collision.
@@BigDavie2000 That's all good and well but the Audi drove into the HGV... that's what I don't get. Yet, as a cyclist, when drivers from a side road, pulled out infront of me, when I have priority (and already going 30+mph), police are just "sorry, no action taken"
#9 driver sped up to prevent the guy from being able to overtake and filter back in - that's why you got brakechecked. Both drivers in the wrong.
He lied when he said he left space. Also, the first sentence “he wouldn’t give up overtaking” tells us there was probably a bit of speeding up to discourage overtaking before the clip began.
@@jeremypnet definitely
The driver already let a van and a car merge in, they are under no obligation to let a third car do the same especially when the merge lane is ending. The overtaking car should have held back and gone in behind.
@@Saeglopur2 he should let the vehicle in if he wants to help prevent a head on smash. Attitudes like yours contribute to many deaths every year.
@joyork Yeah sure, lay the blame at those who drive correctly but not the dangerous drivers who take stupid risks and put everyone else in danger. Pushover/victim blaming attitudes like yours are why the UK is in the mess it's in right now.
As a truck driver the first one gives me so much anxiety!
3:42 golden 😂😂😂
#8 - cakes offence for sure!!
#1 - I nearly had my trailer full of bales turn over on me. Fortunately it was a private farm track and the horses knew to stop. I was 8…
Shouldn't the judge of atleast taken in to consideration that the hgv driver actually pulled in after the audi went off down the slip road(from the lane the audi should of remained in) It is plainly obvious this is a warped verdict. How many drivers would of just cleared off and called it 'knock for knock'?
First clip is absolutely fine. There farmers. Can do whatever they want.😳
#6 is a case of confusing road markings if ever I saw them. The initial road markings show the left lane going left, but at the junction there is another arrow showing you can slip off to the slip road too. So the red car was following one set of markings. Also the slip road lane markings are very faded.
The markings arent that confusing. The red car did nothing wrong. the cammer should check for overtaking traffic before changing lanes unnecessarily. It helps if you pay attention.
@@spiderbootsy But equally the red car should check that the lane is clear before changing lanes and it would have helped if the driver of the red car paid attention too. The fact is that both vehicles tried to enter the new lane at the same time and neither yielded to the other.
@@spiderbootsy the cammer wasn't changing lanes, the lane split for the cammer and they continued on the right hand one. The one changing lane was the red car, as their lane went straight on following the main road.
@@ArminGrewethe lane didn’t spilt, a new lane was created for vehicles exiting at that point. As indicated by the massive white arrow on the road. The lorry changed lanes the marking for the new lane go right back to the junction.
There are two junctions like this near us, road signs and road markings say one thing ahead of the junction and the road markings at the junction show something completely different actually at the junction. Whoever thought that was a good idea needs to have rethink
7:39 - Clearly the judge is an Audi driver who subscribes to the rule that Audi drivers can do what they want on the roads & the rest of us have to drive around them. Surely the Audi driver should have anticipated that the lorry was moving in that lane and probably couldn't have seen the Audi so should have shown the same level of awareness that the judge expected of the lorry driver. At least the banana appeared untraumatised.
5:31 I’m sure I’ve seen other incidents captured on this same camera before!
No 1.
Many many years ago I followed a tractor towing a very overloaded trailer carrying hay bales. It went under some power lines.
6 bales got wiped off the top. The power lines survived.
My sister got 6 free bales of hay, for her horse. I stopped. I Loaded them up. Thanks for the free horse food.
number 11 , that HGV driver is carrying the ballast for the crane , so likely works for the same company
#14 needs a new solicitor.
Very true. People are self centred and only think about themselves and think they are the most important person on the planet. Having a licence to drive is a privilege not a right
To be fair, the crane probably didn't realise he has clipped the traffic lights. I doubt that the contact was even felt by him.
No 1. Sorry mate, I would have been following that haybale from a mile further back!
No. 13 I had to chuckle 2 idiots causing their own mayhem, the car signalling and turning right obviously didn’t check the offside mirror and the twerp overtaking a line of traffic, well!
#13 - always advisable to overtake two cars with a junction/opening either side. Just unlucky on this occasion
Loving the sarcasm here today :) i guess it's also unlucky as it was stolen
Not so sympathetic with #9 - Yes, an idiot in the Ford, but the cammer looks like they were deliberately speeding up to make that (stupid) maneuver even more difficult/dangerous.
Yes, gearing any large vehicle can be a pain, but all they had to do was let off the gas for 2-3 seconds.
he clearly put his foot down.
I would appeal against that verdict. That's an absurdity. He wasn't in front of you so had no right to overtake. F1 rules should apply
You don’t get the choice to appeal as the case is between insurers and they clearly didn’t think it worth it.
#14 I had similar injustice back in 2014. Head on 50mph crash when someone turned right across my path. Both vehicles ended up in the field on my side of the road, even my skid marks are at the very edge of my side of the road. He claims I came round the corner on the wrong side of the road, goes to court, I lost! Turns out his lawyer went to university with the judge 😡 I'm left with knackered knees for the rest of my life, he got his car replaced and £12k compo!
Sadly there is no justice. You are in the wrong class , the working class
That’s actually disgusting, and even more disgusting that just because his lawyer went to uni with the judge he was on his side
The cowards in that Civic after the crash. Does my head in.
Boba Fett is getting his 5 a day
the silence spoils the footage , as real life doesn't get muted.....................
How the fuck was the lorry driver penalised for what a stereotypical Audi driver did? The judge even accepted that the Audi driver was in the wrong lane, and was hiding in the lorry driver's blind spot while making an unsafe and illegal lane change. But it's still mostly the lorry driver's fault? How is that right or fair? If it were me I'd be locked up for contempt of court.
@@zbf5h89ftb I'm not saying it should be trial by stereotype. I am just saying that the Audi driver IS a stereotype. He fucked up, and could not or would not accept that absolute fact. And the poor lorry driver somehow got right properly fucked over!
@@zbf5h89ftb But he did NOT change lane. The dumbarse Audi driver did|!
#15 Worst donuts I've ever seen
It always amazes me how people say "man it's just a straw bale..." bales are very heavy... If one was to fly off, there's a reason traffic cops will stop a vehicle with an unsecured load of bales. And Daryll wins this video purely because of his little Boba Fett standing guard over his carbonite frozen banana.
Where I live, brake checking is a criminal offence. And you can lose your license for 5 years, and have to retake your driving test.
That poor lorry driver! He didn't deserve any of that!
I would've appealed the judges verdict. It's an impossibility to anticipate what someone else is going to do 😡
NO. 15, a very slow doughnut by the jag’
I’d be making a complaint against the judge/magistrate in that last case. stab victims with get jail time. Because they should have anticipated the stabbing.
7:50 why would something so minor end up in court? Is this common for HGV drivers to end up in court over a minor scrape?
It would have been a civil dispute about fault and who pays for repairs, no more than that. I’ve been to court over a similar thing because other driver denied fault. My legal protection took it to court. I won easily, thankfully.
1:20 What is that advertising on the side of the building?
That judge needs to loose his license to practice law
#8 That's why you slow down and give emergencies free passage. They may want to turn off somewhere where you don't expect it. Sure, not very professional driving from the police car, but if the cammer would have slowed down, the police car could have turned left with less danger.
That police officer needs to drive slowly
it was a drunk teenager in a stolen cop car
7:30 - Never been in a HGV but have had this happen where I believe the HGV has got the wrong lane. What I do is either floor it, get in front (HGV's are slow around bends like these as drivers' attention is on keeping to the lane, which is hard) or brake and go behind. Carry on with life. Shit happens, people make mistake. In this case, HGV had correct lane... so how did the judge find it in the cars favour!? Yes, HGV has duty of care over the car but all the car had to do is turn a little to the left. They put themselves in danger... themselves. The HGV was crawling along so not hard to do!? Was the judge drunk or on drugs!?
Hgv didnt have the right lane at all. He went from the right lane to the middle without indicating when the middle lane and right lane on that roundabout are for the m3 S. Im a trucker and im down there all the time, we just use the middle lane cos we're not idiots.
@@LGTGHOSTHUNTING Middle lane clearly indicates it is for M3 N though, you would be cutting vehicles up by using it to go on to M3 S, as the left lane goes onto the A road, while the other lanes shift over a lane to the left, as it's a spiral roundabout. Being a HGV, you guys need to use the longer slip road, which is usually on the left, so HGV driver did it correctly, even if the road markings weren't 100% clear.
I assume at 3:07 the dash cam owner thought it was the red cars fault...clearly not!
#14: Maybe I just don't understand British roundabouts. How is the HGV not at fault? He's coming from a 3-lane road. Should he not be in the right lane on the roundabout? Switched to the middle lane with no indicator, while never checking his mirror for traffic that may be in that lane. I don't see any lane markings indicating that the right lane becomes the middle lane. The board shows right lane is A272. The roundabout shows A272 being the middle lane. So to me, HGV didn't indicate a lane change and merged on top of another vehicle.
No. 7 is perfectly all right because it is a taxi, enough said.
Oh, I *_do_* hope that the dash cam footage of the police car at 3:37 was given _to_ the police. If so that's going to feature in all future local police driving classes as a "This gentlemen, is how *not* to do it.". The driver's canteen nickname is now probably "Yolkie" because of all the egg that he's got on his face.
Yeah 14 is why I stopped driving large vehicles.
You will never win in a court of law if you drive an HGV and you are hit by a car.
4:45 Driver went on red/amber, didn't wait for green. Red means stop. Red always means stop.
Can see the stop line in the video, doesn’t matter when you start to move, it’s when you cross the stop line.
@@v52gc We both know that drivers do it 50% of the time. Drivers are thick and drivers go on red.
Lukasz … doing the exact thing people do all too often there and change lanes as you’re pulling off .. wait until your further up the slip road! The car pulling off the dual carriageway has priority it’s their lane to use not yours!
Lukasz is a danger driving a wagon like that, manouvering without observations etc. He tried to barge the red car off the road. Cant believe he submitted the clip really, given how poor (and dangerous) his driving is
I disagree. The red car was changing lane. Lukasz was continuing on a lane that split into two.
@@ArminGrewe I drive that junction everyday. The middle lane of the carriageway can carry on or come off on to the right lane of the slip road … the left lane of the carriageway has to stay left in their own lane … the red car has done nothing wrong here
@@ArminGrewe its a motowrway exit. anyways, you shouldnt change lanes without looking
@@spiderbootsy and yet the red car did just that
Bro you gotta put some kinda music in the clips that have no audio, basically 80% of the video..
I was taught to drive by an ex Flying Squad policeman, those were the days. Yesterday I saw a police car parked just beyond a pedestrian crossing on the zigzags with the two police officers inside just chatting.
Police cars are allowed to park on zigzags; see Section 14 of The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016
@@ditch3827 Where does it say that they are allowed to? police cars when not on emergency calls are no different to any other vehicles and are subject to all traffic laws
@@ditch3827 I'll take your word for it but they didn't seem to be on an emergency call, they were just chatting. If it's wrong for us.....
@@spiderbootsy Section 14 (3)(c)(viii) of The Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016
@@rafthejaf8789 They don't have to be on an emergency call to be exempt, just be a car used by the police.
For #14 & every other driver out there, red & amber means stop, not go.
5 minutes 12 seconds 😂
You gotta love the Brits....dimmer than a 25 watt light bulb.
Got to love when people expose their own scumbag nature with these kind if comments.
Dimmer than the inside of a dogs colon.
I don't understand how these Judges come up with these verdicts makes absolutely no sense. For accidents like this they should have a judge who has actually driven HGV, would make our life a lot easier.
It's called back handers
#4 needs their licence taking off them. 🤷♂️
Completely legal and safe overtake, you can drive over hatchings bordered by a broken line if you deem it safe to do so. The lorry driver objected to being overtaken and his aggression exacerbated the stimulation. We also don’t know how long the car was held up behind to lorry and what his driving was like. The camera cars rarely show their sh1t driving.
7:19 #14 that ruling by the judge is absolute bs!!!! So now we're suppose to do the thinking for the other driver, one you can't even see from inside the hgv???? Judge must be an audi driver who drives like a typical audiot driver.... And if only audiot drivers understood, you aren't special, audi's are a dime a dozen.....
If you can’t see the lane is clear then moving into that lane is not due care.
#8 why isnt the driver pulled over to allow the police car to pass?
Looks to me the police car didn't have their emergency lights on until just after they passed the cam car. Should have had them on well in advance before doing a manoeuvre like that.
@@peter7582I wonder if him reaching to switch them on contributed to the crash?
The section at 7.29, cannot understand how it was any of the truck drivers fault.
The courts are a laughing stock so perhaps this explains that wrong decision.
10 instant karma unfortunately there are more and more people these days prepared to ignore a red light and not enough Police to get them
Always bad weather....
The judge dealing with the case at 8:00 minutes clearly is not fit for purpose and needs replacing.
John Everton from Liverpool, you send in the most boring videos!
First clip driver was a bit close behind those hay bales, if they HAD fallen, he'd have hit them before he could stop.
Clip 4, can idiots like the VW drive not receive points at least for that sort of driving?
#15 This is normal for St-Helens.
8:12 looks like the Audi driver from #14 has bought themselves a Jag.
6:02 I still cannot decide whether people are just so selfish or just thick as shit.
#14 - Let's imagine that we want to go on the A272 from where the lorry starts. We'd be in the right hand lane as the lorry was. We enter the roundabout and would go into the middle lane as that is the one marked to go to the A272. Lanes 1 and 2 don't go to the A272 on entry to the roundabout. Lanes 1 and 3 don't go to the A272 on the roundabout. Meaning lane 3 on entry is the same lane as lane 2 on the roundabout at that point. What is so hard to understand? Lane 2 goes to the M3(N) Lane 3 goes to the A272 and M3(S) at the entry. The Audi crossed into the truck's lane as if it was going to the M3(S) but if that was where it was going, why was it in the middle lane which goes to the M3(N)? 7:54