What do complex functions look like? | Essence of complex analysis #4

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лип 2024
  • A compilation of plots of different complex functions, like adding and multiplying complex constants, exponentiation, the power function (including nth roots), and logarithm. Issues like branch cuts, branch points, and branches in general will also be discussed as the result of inability to construct the plots. Finally, we will do a 4D rotation (composed of two 4D reflections) to the typical Riemann surfaces pictures, and see that it should be the same as its inverse functions.
    The video is going to be jam-packed with visuals and animations, so while it may sometimes be too quick, you can pause the video; or you can just simply appreciate the visuals, the plots, and the animations.
    Some interesting plots are usually the vector plots, like for the power functions, we have different regions of flow. The formula of 2(n+1) when n is positive can be left as an exercise - it is not TOO difficult to see why, but it is not the focus of the video, or not the primary feature that I want to discuss; or for negative powers, we have dipole, quadrupole, and octupole, and in general multipole, which might be familiar to physicists, because in electromagnetism, we use multipole expansions to see the dominant effects of the electric field.
    Watch the previous video to see what the 5 methods of visualisation I am referring to, and also watch the Problem of Apollonius video for the next video!
    Video chapters:
    00:00 Introduction
    01:01 Adding constant
    02:51 Multiplying constant
    06:14 Exponentiation
    09:47 Power function - integer powers
    14:11 Power function - complex inversion
    15:39 Power function - square root branches
    20:37 Power function - Riemann surfaces
    22:53 Logarithm
    26:51 Logarithm - 4D rotation
    Music used:
    Recollections - Asher Fulero
    Stinson - Reed Mathis
    Beseeched - Asher Fulero
    White River - Aakash Gandhi
    Other than commenting on the video, you are very welcome to fill in a Google form linked below, which helps me make better videos by catering for your math levels:
    forms.gle/QJ29hocF9uQAyZyH6
    If you want to know more interesting Mathematics, stay tuned for the next video!
    SUBSCRIBE and see you in the next video!
    If you are wondering how I made all these videos, even though it is stylistically similar to 3Blue1Brown, I don't use his animation engine Manim, but I will probably reveal how I did it in a potential subscriber milestone, so do subscribe!
    Social media:
    Facebook: / mathemaniacyt
    Instagram: / _mathemaniac_
    Twitter: / mathemaniacyt
    Patreon: / mathemaniac (support if you want to and can afford to!)
    Merch: mathemaniac.myspreadshop.co.uk
    For my contact email, check my About page on a PC.
    See you next time!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 147

  • @mathemaniac
    @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +25

    Yes, the merch store is here now: mathemaniac.myspreadshop.co.uk/
    Patreon if you want to see the videos 24 hours in advance: www.patreon.com/mathemaniac
    As always, pause the video if necessary.
    I realise that making a whole video series about complex analysis is a really monumental task - much, much, much more than what I expected - but don't worry, I will still make them *eventually*, just that (1) I need a lot more time, so the next video is not going to appear at least until mid / late Dec, and (2) I might have to sometimes switch up, i.e. only occasionally putting out videos on CA, and not necessarily all uploads would be about CA. This is a problem I found myself into, like the group theory series, that I feel like some people might not like CA all the time (or at least, will get bored after something like half a year), which is why I want to give a heads up that this might happen if I feel like it.
    This video is much better viewed with a good degree of familiarity of the stuff mentioned at the start, so PLEASE watch those first; and of course, watch the video on Problem of Apollonius as well for the next video on Möbius maps.

    • @jacobhoward7579
      @jacobhoward7579 2 роки тому +1

      Nice I might buy a mug man ... Glad you've got a monetary support structure external to YT internal issues... Also added a comment about electrical engineering and how we use the Möbius transform as a tool via the smith chart

  • @MathPhysicsEngineering
    @MathPhysicsEngineering 2 роки тому +100

    This time you outdid yourself, an absolutely incredible job! It gonna be on the must-watch list for my students. You set the bar really high this time, you inspire me to put more work into my videos!

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +7

      Thank you so much for the kind words!

  • @jill6776
    @jill6776 2 роки тому +29

    This is why I freaking love complex analysis

  • @ProCoderIO
    @ProCoderIO 2 роки тому +23

    LOVE complex analysis. These visual tactics to SHOW complex functions is pretty cool. Thanks!

  • @johnchessant3012
    @johnchessant3012 2 роки тому +21

    These animations are brilliant! This really makes clear what a branch point is and why it's necessary for sqrt and log. I can't wait to see the visualizations for the Mobius transformation!

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +2

      Thanks so much for the appreciation!

  • @Iudicatio
    @Iudicatio 2 роки тому +9

    My favorite are the Re-Im plots even if they are less useful because looking at them I am in awe of the beauty and the complexity of the 4th dimensional world they came from. In the others it's not quite so obvious to see.

  • @antoninperonnet6138
    @antoninperonnet6138 2 роки тому +4

    The inverse function on the z-w plane is really nice and helpfull, thank's !

  • @borial01
    @borial01 2 роки тому +9

    It's clear how much effort goes into these videos, thank you! Great work!

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks so much for the appreciation!

  • @gn7586
    @gn7586 2 роки тому +4

    What serendipity to have your next video be on moebius maps just when I will need it for uni - brilliant series man.

  • @battlelance279
    @battlelance279 2 роки тому +13

    Just discovered the channel today. I am a big fan of how you explain the topics in all your videos. I look forward to seeing what you make in the future :)

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +2

      Thanks so much for the kind words!

  • @yurisich
    @yurisich 2 роки тому +6

    Those 29 minutes went by fast. I can't believe you managed to get that much into one video. Looking forward to the Möbius maps video!

  • @enbyarchmage
    @enbyarchmage 2 роки тому +23

    Wonderful video! Little gems like this are one of the things that make me keep loving math 🥰
    P.S - Try not to worry too much about your French pronunciation. My French teacher (who is French herself) once told me that "French words are like Christmas trees: full of seemingly ornamental letters".

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +2

      Oh thank you!

    • @Neme112
      @Neme112 Рік тому +1

      Lol, that's what other language speakers say about English :D

    • @enbyarchmage
      @enbyarchmage Рік тому +2

      @@Neme112 I've seen a native English speaker say that about English...

  • @antoine2571
    @antoine2571 Рік тому

    Thank you so much for this series. really amazing

  • @tanchienhao
    @tanchienhao 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome channel and video!! Im glad somebody is finally making videos to illuminate the beauty of complex functions

  • @angeldude101
    @angeldude101 2 роки тому +5

    This actually solves one of the mysteries behind a fractal that I found. I didn't know why there was a discontinuity along the real axis and now I know, because I'm taking roots of the inputs. I also managed to find a single white pixel at the origin which would be the branch point. The exact roots also depends on the inputs which demystified what frankly should've been obvious which was white around the point -1. The specific roots that I was taking was z+1. When z is -1, taking the reciprocal before using it as an exponent makes it blow up to infinity. Now I'm curious what I'd get if I tried plotting it in 3D so it would avoid the branch cut.

  • @rektwatermelon6746
    @rektwatermelon6746 2 роки тому +4

    Worth the wait

  • @little_bit_curious5122
    @little_bit_curious5122 2 роки тому +2

    wonderful video... currently I'm reading about translation, rotation, inversion, magnification and this video helps me a lot to understand z and w plane visually
    Many thanks :)

  • @PunmasterSTP
    @PunmasterSTP 2 роки тому

    Branch cut? More like “This is the stuff!” I’m enjoying your videos immensely and I can’t wait to watch the rest of them.

  • @hom0morphism
    @hom0morphism 2 роки тому +3

    wow! amazing video! the apollonius video was the first of your videos i watched and i absolutely loved it! thanks for making this content. waiting for the next video :)

  • @mnada72
    @mnada72 2 роки тому +2

    🤐 and 😭
    How could any complex analysis course go on without these kind of visualization!! Thaaaaaaaaaasank you
    BTW this 28 min video needs 2 weeks to internalise.

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      These visualisations do take a fair bit of effort, which is probably why a lot of courses wouldn't do these.

  • @MsSlash89
    @MsSlash89 2 роки тому +1

    Can’t wait for the next video about Möbius Transformations!

  • @vector8310
    @vector8310 2 роки тому

    Enchanting and illuminating

  • @MichaelMaths_
    @MichaelMaths_ 2 роки тому +1

    I like the z-w plane method the most, but the 3d plot showing different 4d perspectives is really amazing and mind-boggling when I first saw it!

  • @eclips4385
    @eclips4385 11 місяців тому

    I love vectorial representation and its links with magnetism

  • @GEMSofGOD_com
    @GEMSofGOD_com Рік тому +2

    Super cool, keep on

  • @emmynoether5878
    @emmynoether5878 2 роки тому +1

    Can't wait for the mobius map video

  • @TheJara123
    @TheJara123 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliancy as your standard..so we thank you and get messssmerised by your presentation...

  • @rogeriogouvea7278
    @rogeriogouvea7278 4 місяці тому

    Wow made me feel nostalgic of complex analysis.

  • @darthtleilaxu4021
    @darthtleilaxu4021 2 роки тому +1

    Merci pour cette vidéo.

  • @julesthomas3335
    @julesthomas3335 2 роки тому +3

    As always that's a beautifull video

  • @TheMemesofDestruction
    @TheMemesofDestruction 2 роки тому

    Thank you so much for this explanation! I understand theta much better now. ^.^

  • @arthurmenezes5772
    @arthurmenezes5772 2 роки тому +2

    The video actually came! Never doubted of it though. Amazing :)

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      Thanks so much for waiting!

    • @arthurmenezes5772
      @arthurmenezes5772 2 роки тому

      I feel like the "this picture comes from f(z)=1/z" was made for me 😔👉👈

  • @a.osethkin55
    @a.osethkin55 2 роки тому +2

    Thank you!!!

  • @entertainmentupdates5730
    @entertainmentupdates5730 2 роки тому +3

    nice explanation .. really apprecitable

  • @hewwo3743
    @hewwo3743 2 роки тому +2

    oooh can’t wait for midterms to end so I can watch this!! 😂🥳

  • @i18nGuy
    @i18nGuy 2 роки тому +1

    Brilliant and Beautiful!

  • @dzuchun
    @dzuchun 2 роки тому +1

    Amazing video. Reveal such bizarre information for the one, who studies complex analysis, that you're like "AAAAAAAAAA"

  • @anshumanagrawal346
    @anshumanagrawal346 2 роки тому +1

    I'm really glad I found your channel when I did ∫

  • @DestroManiak
    @DestroManiak 2 роки тому +1

    daaaamn this is haard work

  • @Xayuap
    @Xayuap 2 роки тому

    asking wich way to plot I like most is like tell me to choose an icecream flavor

  • @JojiThomas7431
    @JojiThomas7431 2 роки тому

    very nice

  • @liufeng2095
    @liufeng2095 2 роки тому +1

    Really comfortable hearing this guy explaining in clear-spoken English, supongo que no es 👳🏾‍♂️

  • @user-iw1qn3mt7e
    @user-iw1qn3mt7e 2 роки тому +1

    tnx!

  • @mathanimation7563
    @mathanimation7563 2 роки тому +1

    Waiting for next video

  • @falsechinese2435
    @falsechinese2435 2 роки тому

    Got an idea for a t-ahirt: At 17:16 there's the image of the branch cut, really nice pastel colors, it would be really cool that image on a t-shirt and the colors extending all the way through the shirt including the back (though the back coud be in a pinkish white, instead of white)

  • @chonchjohnch
    @chonchjohnch 2 роки тому +1

    That exponential 3d Plot be looking dummy thick

  • @tapnix7300
    @tapnix7300 2 роки тому +4

    First, Cant wait to learn about the concept!

  • @kennethvaten9259
    @kennethvaten9259 Рік тому +2

    Hey, I think there's a small mistake at 5:03. Matrix multiplication on the right side of the equation, the second row first column spot should be "ad + bc"!

    • @matveyshishov
      @matveyshishov Рік тому

      Yeah, I was wondering about the same. A second check is that complex number a+bi is represented by a matrix [[a, -b],[b, a]].

  • @clay.tennis
    @clay.tennis 2 роки тому +1

    Sweet.

  • @jaeimp
    @jaeimp Рік тому

    Excellent job! Can I ask you how you generated the flowing Polya fields?

  • @bookman9897
    @bookman9897 2 роки тому +5

    Looks like UA-cam algorithm is withdrawing from drugs

  • @CV-wg5dp
    @CV-wg5dp 2 роки тому +2

    Great videos, they help me a lot. Do you have a tutorial on how to plot the figures you present (software, code, etc.)?

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      Thanks for the appreciation. For software related questions, you can read the description.

  • @jursamaj
    @jursamaj 2 роки тому +3

    13:20 The quadrupole is normally arranged in a square.

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +2

      Yep, that's right. The reason I did that was essentially making it clear that it is just composed of two opposite dipoles, and also that it aligns (somewhat) with the vector field generated.

  • @md.adnannabib2066
    @md.adnannabib2066 11 місяців тому

    i like the 3d plot

  • @Learath2
    @Learath2 Рік тому +1

    I love Mod-Arg plots. Argument just maps so well to hue that other graphs just confuse me :)

  • @Xayuap
    @Xayuap 2 роки тому

    I think z^(1/2) color plane has spin 1/2 so the branch cut is an effort to project the helix in a 2d plane

  • @ArthurRainbow
    @ArthurRainbow 10 місяців тому

    Around 5'55'', what is the function you use to transform z into e^z smoothly? When you were transforming z into z+c the intermediate steps were clearly z+tc with t going from 0 to 1. To display cz, you used z->tz, with t going from 1 to `c`. However, I can't guess which methods generated the intermediary step when you switched progressively from the identity function to the expoential function

  • @darthstarch
    @darthstarch Рік тому

    Do you have any recommendations for best available graphing software for complex analysis? I'm a fain of the level curve transformations you use in this video for example.

  • @harshavardhan9399
    @harshavardhan9399 2 роки тому

    Amazing visuals!!!
    But my only feedback is that you should explain the dynamics and should add some rigor before showing your visualizations, that makes your visualizations much more beautiful than before.
    and this is what makes visual complex analysis book beautiful.
    for example, while showing the z-w plane graph of exponentiation you should have shown that e^x corresponds to magnitude and e^iy corresponds to arg, so, as x increases magnitude increases and as y increases arg increases

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      Thanks! I hope that was more clarifying when I showed and explained more in the domain coloring plot, but thanks for the feedback!

  • @jelenahegser445
    @jelenahegser445 2 роки тому

    i created a method of visualisation of complex functions which uses movement through a time axis as one dimension. shal f:C->C ,z->f(z)=r(z)*exp(i*phi(z)) be a complex function in its polar form with z=x+iy. Then consider a parametric Plot g_t:R^2->R^3 , t element [0, 2pi] as folows:
    g_1(x,y)=x
    g_2(x,y)=y
    g_3(x,y)=Re(f(z))*cos(phi(t))+Im(f(z))*sin(phi(t))
    if you plug in any complex function and 3D-Plot with t as parameter which you can control afterwords, you can spin around in a cycle through the 4D Graph of the function displaying one angle at a time. if you would animate it, so that t continusly goes from 0 to 2pi in a loop, you get a "4D" animation, which represents the whole function. Also you could role around other Planes, like the input Plane to get more insight.
    I found this method very usefull, when i studied complex functions in more detail.

  • @yeahok2278
    @yeahok2278 Рік тому

    In regards to polya vector fields, what is the exact definition of them for a beginner? Is it just an animated vector field, and what does the animation depict? I am not too sure, sorry if I have missed anything :)

  • @erawanpencil
    @erawanpencil 7 місяців тому

    @11:30, can someone explain why the identity function divides the plane into 4 flowing quadrants? I would have thought it would just be a static vector field since each vector is just itself after identity?

  • @gudmundurjonsson4357
    @gudmundurjonsson4357 2 роки тому

    13:46 well it also makes sense since two sets of two charges are grouped up, so they just act as a stronger version of a monopole, so it can also be viewed as just the 6 charges

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      Thought about this as well, but the thing is you can use the same argument to a quadrupole (there would be 3 monopoles together in this case), yet there are 4 loops for a quadrupole...

    • @gudmundurjonsson4357
      @gudmundurjonsson4357 2 роки тому

      ​@@mathemaniac hmm yeah that is weird. then the way id think of it is: the octapole is a combination of two "opposite" quadripoles side by side, their opposite nature means that a plus an a minus meat in the middle and "combine" the sections that the quadripoles would generate by themselves. This doesnt happen from the dipole to the quadripole since their equal charges meet in the middle. i'd think this holds for higher numbers aswell. but then again it doesn hold for monopole to dipole, since those dont "combine" in the way i've described.

    • @gudmundurjonsson4357
      @gudmundurjonsson4357 2 роки тому

      @@mathemaniac great visuals btw

  • @hansisbrucker813
    @hansisbrucker813 2 роки тому +2

    I love it. 😁👍
    Am I correct in my observation that the flow of the vector fields in the integer power parts look hyperbolic? 🤔

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks!
      Yes, it IS hyperbolic. You can even prove this is hyperbolic, if you know a very useful tool in fluid dynamics: streamfunctions.

    • @hansisbrucker813
      @hansisbrucker813 2 роки тому

      @@mathemaniac Cool 😎

  • @Abbas-fl3bw
    @Abbas-fl3bw 11 місяців тому

    At 4:58 in the multiplication section, isn't the bottom left element supposed to be bc+ad as opposed to ac+bd?

  • @denelson83
    @denelson83 2 роки тому +1

    Why are you not using black for zero in your domain colouring plots?

  • @MesbahSalekeen
    @MesbahSalekeen 2 роки тому

    any way to get the code to generate the riemann surfaces?? I tried a lot but could not finish it.........

  • @Akshaylive
    @Akshaylive 5 місяців тому

    @4:55 there's a mistake in the multiplication of matrix.

  • @mnada72
    @mnada72 Рік тому

    How the vector plot is generated? What software is used ?

  • @ujjwalgupta6503
    @ujjwalgupta6503 Рік тому

    I just lerped the input and output points and it looked almost the same as the exponentiation one

  • @artkutyuska9842
    @artkutyuska9842 Рік тому

    Complex sin cos tan and hyperbolic counterparts please.

  • @user-gv5wm3ru6j
    @user-gv5wm3ru6j 2 роки тому

    Apollonius Circle

  • @dereathacross1991
    @dereathacross1991 8 місяців тому

    Why does the octupole only have 6 loops? Seems it should have 8? Would the plus minus bubble things be arranged in a ring alternating plus minus? I'm not an expert in this subject matter, just trying to learn and understand. I'm probably not understanding something.

  • @KKulou
    @KKulou Місяць тому

    Hello author, I've recently been working on a mathematical physics chronicles content and I very much need to edit 5 seconds of footage using the footage from the video you created, I really, really need the 5 seconds of material. I'll be sure to credit the source of the footage and @ your channel when I'm done with my work. I very much recognize your work and thanks again. : )
    (The above text was translated by me, using a translation program, so please forgive me if I use the wrong words)😀

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  Місяць тому

      If it is just 5 seconds of footage, and you credit the channel, feel free to use it.

  • @agrajyadav2951
    @agrajyadav2951 Рік тому +2

    bro beautiful

  • @user-gv5wm3ru6j
    @user-gv5wm3ru6j 2 роки тому

    Inversion transformation

  • @samuelthecamel
    @samuelthecamel 2 роки тому

    Fun fact: In power functions, the number of branches corresponds to the denominator of the exponent

  • @y4nik
    @y4nik 2 роки тому

    Can anyone explain why the identity function vector field is split in 4 parts while the z^-1 function has the shape of an magnetic monopole. For me they look swapped, where is my mistake?

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +1

      I was plotting the Polya vector field, so I am plotting the vector field generated by the **conjugate** of that function. This convention is explained in the previous video on how to visualize complex functions in general.
      The advantage of using Polya vector field is that it makes complex integration a lot easier to visualize, and also that it actually represents invsicid, incompressible, irrotational flows.

    • @y4nik
      @y4nik 2 роки тому

      @@mathemaniac ah yes, this makes sense of course. Thank you for the fast response.
      And for the fantastic video, I love it!

  • @ColeCoug
    @ColeCoug 2 роки тому +1

    This video slaps ass. Incredible animations great explanations

  • @forheuristiclifeksh7836
    @forheuristiclifeksh7836 3 місяці тому +1

    0:05

  • @zzeuqdhd9598
    @zzeuqdhd9598 2 роки тому

    Puisque peut cree un ordre dans la desordre , exemple les nombre premier le probleme la difernte p(n+1)-p(n) la desordre malgre π(x)=1-k +x/π +1/π ×la somme de 1 linfini de sin nπx/m /n p(n+1) - p(n) =2m k appartiene 0 vers l infini la correction donne que l unicite dans la circonference [nπ/2, (n+1)π/2] de p l axe de sin .

  • @strangeWaters
    @strangeWaters 2 роки тому

    Couldn't you visualize the branch points with helices? i.e. just visualize it as a multi-valued function extending in both directions. (Or as a single-valued function returning equivalence classes; same thing.) (You could also highlight a particular argument equivalence class on the helix with a different color, to indicate the "portal" the helix is periodically passing through.)

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      Are the 3D plots of square root and logarithm in the video what you mean?

  • @agrajyadav2951
    @agrajyadav2951 Рік тому

    69k views. Nice ;)

  • @forheuristiclifeksh7836
    @forheuristiclifeksh7836 3 місяці тому

    22:00

  • @tihyaayouz2801
    @tihyaayouz2801 2 роки тому

    نحتاج لترجمة please

  • @diktakt1187
    @diktakt1187 2 роки тому

    25:10

  • @nif4345
    @nif4345 2 роки тому

    Howdyou get the thumbnail

  • @forheuristiclifeksh7836
    @forheuristiclifeksh7836 3 місяці тому

    11:18

  • @NonuGamezRobloxE
    @NonuGamezRobloxE 2 роки тому

    dream

  • @mastershooter64
    @mastershooter64 2 роки тому +1

    23:34
    "since we chose the black color for 1"
    I think you meant 0, you kept saying 1 instead of 0

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому +1

      I did intend to say 1, because I meant that the color at 1 should be black, because log 1 = 0.

    • @mastershooter64
      @mastershooter64 2 роки тому

      @@mathemaniac ahh okay, awesome video btw, I really enjoyed it

  • @wugionyoutube
    @wugionyoutube Рік тому

    Nice visuals, thank you, eg, those transitions between inverse functions.
    Why not use "true 4D" visuals, is what I'm always wondering. A "simple" tool like Graphig Calculator 4.0 offers it, so why not more powerful tools?
    Compare for instance the Log z item (together with its inverse Exp z) with my "4D" video on it at
    ua-cam.com/video/YUmMXPE3Mpo/v-deo.html
    and many more functions on my "4D" channel there.

  • @xebatansis
    @xebatansis 2 роки тому

    Sometimes I fear humanity get stupider each generation. Now I don' t as much.

  • @LoveLifeLive1
    @LoveLifeLive1 4 місяці тому

    I hardly understand ur vedio.

    • @synaestheziac
      @synaestheziac 3 місяці тому

      Did you watch the previous ones on the playlist?

  • @Gordy-io8sb
    @Gordy-io8sb Місяць тому

    Also, the way you talk about the "hue" is very non-concrete. A mathematician's way of describing it is "The modulus is cyclic, and cycles n times for every 2pi radians along the unit circle.". But, you're not a mathematician, quite the opposite actually little buddy. 😊

  • @Gordy-io8sb
    @Gordy-io8sb Місяць тому

    It's more traditional to label the second angle φ, and the second radius ρ. But okay, whatever makes you feel better little buddy. You know nothing about mathematics.

  • @martinbakker7615
    @martinbakker7615 2 роки тому

    18 ad spots? ! Bye

  • @jonetyson
    @jonetyson 2 роки тому

    The images go by too briefly. It's better to linger on them a while without audio. For someone who already has a handle on complex analysis the talking is the least interesting part.

  • @BlackCat039
    @BlackCat039 2 роки тому

    What a boring introduction...

  • @pinklady7184
    @pinklady7184 2 роки тому +1

    I have viewed your entire playlist of complex analysis. I have learned much and thank you very very much.
    After watching your videos, I went exploring a list of complex analysi at Wikipedia. Reading is a pleasure.
    en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_complex_analysis_topics

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      Yes, complex analysis is a beautiful topic! The playlist is far from complete, since each video takes a long time.

    • @pinklady7184
      @pinklady7184 2 роки тому

      Mathemaniac I understand the lengthy time of creating animation and video editing. Do you make your own videos? What softwares do you use? I am guessing you use Blender, a 3D modelling software.

    • @mathemaniac
      @mathemaniac  2 роки тому

      I make all my videos, but for software, please read the description.