100 Rarest American Old Cars of All Time You've Never Seen
Вставка
- Опубліковано 16 вер 2024
- Welcome to 100 Rarest American Old Cars of All Time You've Never Seen
Have you ever thought about the rarest American old cars that are hardly seen anywhere? From forgotten classics to hidden treasures, these vintage vehicles hold stories waiting to be told. Each car is a testament to the creativity and innovation of its era, showcasing unique designs and engineering marvels. Join us as we explore the 100 Rarest American Old Cars of All Time You've Never Seen
--------------
Copyright Disclaimer
We do not fully own the material compiled in this video. It belongs to individuals or organizations that deserve respect.
We use under: Copyright disclaimer section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976. "fair use" is allowed for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching. scholarships and research.
--------------
#musclecars
#fastestcars
#luxurycars
#vintagevehicles
The 1940 Lincoln photo was a Lincoln from the 1960's , the Buick Skylark was from the 1970's , the " 1953 Corvette " was actually from the 1960's. What's going on here. ? Don't you guys know your cars ?
This crap needs to be banned. So much misinformation and error. The author is probably somebody in their 20s who never saw, much less owned , one of these old cars, and is lousy at research.
The person who did this shouldn't ever comment on vehicles again
No they don't
Fr saying a 70s Skylark was in the 50s get outta here 😂
The 1953 Skylark is actually the 1970 Skylark. This video needs corrections!!
It needs a LOT of corrections
You need to get you years right for example 63 Corvette stingray not a 53 and there was several other year mistakes. Love your show as it brought back memories to me. Thank you.
Yep he showed a pic of a "73" buick skylark & called it a '53' 9 other screw ups a will never watch this again he knows nothing about cars.
This is terrible! I was truly interested in seeing this, but the photos and the information about the vehicles are often incorrect.
Thank you for input. Saved me lots of time. Gremlins, Pacers, any AMCs. Yugos...you SEE the latest 4 door ? Called a WEGO. Stay cool.
@@bilboardman3430Yugo? That barely classifies as a car.🤣What a joke of a car. A girl had one in highschool. She could never find it. 3 or 4 people could pick it up and move it
Same with the Datsun 210
If you want to be an expert on classic cars, then get it right!!! This is sad.
@@briankennedy5578wŵ
Oldsmobile 455 did not come out till 68
The SS Chevy Chevelle isn’t a 1970 , it’s actually the 1968 , it’s the first year with the rounded body style and the only year to have the slim tail lights , I bought one at a garage sale when I was 18 years old and it needed a cam and lifters , it was worn out and was the first car I tore apart by myself as a kid , it was an experience. After I finished it I drag raced a gremlin with a 304 in it , it sounded good but wasn’t even a close match for my Chevelle , got a ticket that night and had to sell it to pay for my court costs and fines , so sad , I loved that car , but I was a stupid kid at the time.
👍👍👍✌️✌️✌️
I had one also, it was blown engine, my uncle gave me a 455 Olds engine, Trans, helped me install it, he had a garage and did lots of swapping engines, that little chevelle was wicked. 😊
I must say I love most of these old vehicles, just unique and classy......well done.💯🇹🇹
The Corvette in the video that they say is a 1953 Corvette is actually a 1963 split window Corvette.
I owned a 63bSplit Window Corvette. It was green exterior and had tan leather seats. I drove it and blew the 327 transmission, i sold it in 1969 for 1,000.00. Little did i know the value of that great car today. I was 20 years old then. O have regrets!
So good
They really need someone who knows years and real engine information.
Lots of incorrect pics
Yes, a lot of errors. I'll go elsewhere
Not to mention the narrator is severely irritating with "his" pronunciations & randumb, misplaced annunciation. It's like he's rushing words without reason.
This shows you A.I. sucks! The kids are gonna be lost...
Thinking a Oldsmobile is a Ford... Lol This is sad
Possible AI@@jasonrusso9808
Did not include 1940 Lincoln Continental which the first of the LC MARK series
That restored Pontiac 1957 convertible was oh so SWEET.
The click pic is the best one. A Monte Carlo Chevelle...a Montelle.
The AMC AMX two seaters were produced 1968 ,69,70 the 1970 AMX is the rarest with only 4000 produced
The car in the thumbnail on this would be cool looking if it was ever made
Every time the narrator talks about the famous Chevy tri five series he keeps showing a 53 or 54. If you’re going to talk about one of the tri five series, the least you could do is show an accurate representation.
I had a 1973 Pontiac Granville convertible great car
After much thought and careful deliberation, I have come to the conclusion that I want one of every car on this list. Too bad I can't even afford one of them.
The skylark that you display in this video is from the 1970s not the 1950s
I HAVE seen most of them!!!! How the hell do you know what I haven't seen????
The voice sounds like an AI bot reading its own script. A lot of errors and mismatched scripts. Does have good pics however. Many great cars were ignored…!!!
Yes I agree several mistakes with the wrong year for different cars
One of the rarest production cars is the 1918 Krit. It was a two seater with a T-block engine. Only 18 were left in 1974. Don't know if any exist today.
Tucker was destroyed by the big 3, they didn’t want his masterpiece to show the best we could of had
Some of the info is off, but the cars save the video
Commentator describes a car (example) 53 Corvette while showing a 63 Vette. He does that several times with other cars like a 50's Lincoln while showing a late 60's Lincoln.
There was 51 Tuckers. 50 production models and the one they used for testing and eventually wrecked.
What is becoming rare and something you've never seen is a UA-cam automobile video that's devoid of inaccurate AI drivel.
The Thundebird you showed was not a 1957, but a 56!
You did not show a 1956 Chevrolet Bel Air either, but the same 1954.
True, what a waste of time!
I could not agree more
What the he'll is a 58 Cadillac
" brew - ham "??
,I had a 58,' Broughm
I bought it used and it still had the magnetic shot glasses in. The glove box.
I never saw a 57 or 58 Mercury Turnpike Cruiset either.
There are a few flaws in the presentation of the cars. I know the GSX wasn't a car from the 50's. They're talking about a 50's car with a 70's body. Is this the Mandela effect?
Mostly comments pointing out that this video should have been re-edited prior to posting thou there is alot of correct info and really nice pics - there's just more than a few mis-matched of the 100 along with a few omitted that were more rare than the 100. posted.
Advice : take it down - do a tad more research - re-edit everything - repost for nothing but positive feedback - the results will speak volumes.
Yes I agree there are several mistakes in this video. The 1954 Chevrolet Belair is used for the 55 and 56 years and possibly more. The corvette shown is not the correct year for the first corvette year and I believe there was a Lincoln that was called a 1940 that was around a 1960 or there about. Maybe the person who made the video relied on UA-cam for accurate pictures of vehicles and we all know that UA-cam and Google are hardly a reliable source for accurate or truthful information.
At first I thought it might be just showing different models of what was being discussed. But they repeatedly gave info on the 1953 corvette while showing a 1963 and that's the only picture they showed
What’s the car on the cover photos ?
Who the hell. Checked this vid before putting it out...showing wrong cars at times...😂
The "53 Corvette" is a 63 Split Window. 🤔
Whover put together the videos apparently has no clue what classic cars actually look like. The Studebaker coupe is actually a pickup. The 1940 Lincoln Continental is actually a 60's Continental. And there are so many other mistakes. Let me know if you need me to identify the vehicles. I've been around for most of them.
You guy’s need to fix this video it would be great to watch if your pictures and information actually was correct
At 18:40, that is DEFINITELY NOT a 1940's Lincoln! More like the mid 60's!!!
Who the hell wrote the script???
Love the picks but it's too frustrating for the ignorance.
Got the years mixed up !!!
do you people even watch your content before you post it, I like your narrator because he doesn't mispronounce words like so many do, but several cars were the wrong year by 20 years for what he was talking about
You really scrud the puch on the kervet and the phantom etc etc etc .
The Corvette displayed as the 1953 Corvette is not the 1953 Corvette it is a Corvette with the split rear window in the 1960s
That is NOT a 1940 Lincoln , It's a 1960
Sad that the AI is so dumb that it misses that it is talking about a truck while showing a car! LOL Work's great!
So much narration vs pics wrong here ....
THE CHEVROLET IN THE COLOR GOLD IS NOT IN THIS VIDEO UA-cam LIED AGAIN THEY STOLE 70 MINUTES FROM MY LIFE
ITS NOT FAIR
This A.I. kills me...
Cool cars, but the info is so vanilla, basic. Pictures of the wrong cars.... Just use captions.
I mean, it's so obvious the mistakes, the cars pictured are from an entirely different design era. And they use the same images for the 55, 56, and 57 bel air none are correct
Your Corvette shown, was not a 53!!! The 55 Bel Air shown was not a 55, it was a 54! Your editing Stinks!
is the car on the thumbnail real?? i cant tell if its ai or not
You did not show the 55 or the 56 Chevy Bel air or sports. All you did was repeated showing the 54 Chevy 🤬😡
This might be good if you made sure the pictures you're showing are the ones being talked about. Talking about a Studebaker coupe and showing a pickup and several other things like that is bad enough but talking about the 1940 Lincoln Zephyr and the cars you showed were 1961 and 1962 Lincoln Continental. Seriously? And 1953 Buick Skylark convertible? Funny how it looks like a 1972 two door Skylark Coupe. Come on
I was about to share this video,,until the bloopers showed,,not much of rare cars showned
None of the skylarks shown were from the fifties
Nice pictures but years are wrong for most ( do some research )
How bout a 1965 Nova ss with a 230 6 cyl, powerglide? Shift console, bowtie tach on top, factory ac, dark green tinted glass, from Miami. Paid $200. Airport seizure compound. Started right up
Very Strange
I've never seen so many gaffs, incorrect images, and incorrect information in a automotive history video. I was looking forward to this. I cut it off 1/3 of the way into it. Ridiculous. You need to go back and research your historical facts again.
1953 Buick Skylark Convertible, huh? Do you even car bro?
Poorly done in my humble opinion, incorrect picture with model yrs, some photos used were over 20 yrs apart! Posting a hardtop for a convertible. Shameful. Stopped watching at the 30 min mark. Do better.
I dont see how a i is an improvement in any way.
Wish you would go back and fix the 1955 ‘56 entries for Chevrolet . You show the same 54 Chevy for all tri fives! Annoying!
#3 Talbot Lago & #2 Delahaye
ARE FRENCH CARS FROM "FRANCE", THEREFORE THEY'RE NOT AMERICAN.
This is what happens when you it up to AI to make these videos.
So much misinformation, malinformation and disinformation.
Where's the big blue box warning us about the dangers of misinformation, UA-cam?
Keeps showing the same cars.
Click bait,,,as usual.
Fire your AI voiceover people!
This is horrible. Pictures don't match the voice over....
One of the worst, uninformed about subject matter videos I've ever seen. The 1970 Chevelle is actually a1968.
Furthermore, the picture shown as an introducer to open the video is a fake picture. Chevrolet never produced this production model.
The 1953 Corvette and the 1955 and 1956 Chevy are the WRONG cars shown = This video is terrible!!!
THIS IS BOTCHED NARRATIVE DID NOT MATCH THE PICTURES
THE INFORMATION WAS VAGUE AT BEST
VERY LONG VERY LONG AND I GIVE IT ( D ) GRADE
I was going to sub to this channel but all of these mistakes are just terrible. Thanks for doing your research and identification correctly…ugh!
You have earned a do not recommend channel click !
Why is this video so popular?
It's probably not. Only has less than 250 likes
Your getting about half of the years wrong on your cars like you called a 67 corvette a 53 and you go your 40 s thru your 60 s 60 percent wrong but the cars are pretty anyway
This is such BS!!! At Minute 31:40 it starts talking about the 1955 Bel Aire... THe Ultimate Classic Chev. YET is shows a 1954 What a JOKE! IF that's wrong, you can't trust ANYTHING here!
no where near a 1953 skylark shown looks more like a 1970-73 too many more mistakes to bother if your gonna do something like this again please get your facts right before you makes fools of yourselves--- hey maybe you can do the 100 mistakes on video about cars.... (your video could account for maybe 50 of them)
Just like pronouncing Willys as Willy's , if you knew what you were talking about you would the proper pronounceation
Absolutely crap they don’t know there car’s at all
Years are messed up such as #63 js a 1970
Fayton! Is this ai generated??? Phantom. P h a n t o m
This program is full of stupid mistakes
Why even air it!
DEI video poor quality and inaccurate.
26:49 this 1953 buick skylark was 20 years ahead of it's time😂😂
or this
18:41 beautiful 1940 continental was also 20 years ahead of it's time too 😂😂
27:32 this is 1953 corvette?!😂😂
31:48 that is not 1955 bel air,that is 54
34:01 this same 1954 BelAir,that was 1955 at 31:48 is now 1956?😂😂
57:45 wasn't this 1953 buick skylark at 26:49?🤣🤣
58:19 that is 1970 Chevelle SS it is 1968!
SUCH GARBAGE VIDEO,ALL CARS AFTER 1946 WERE AVAILABLE AND NONE OF THEM ARE THE ONES WE'VE NEVER SEEN
This really was horrible!! Called a 63 split window Vette a 53? Hate when they don't know what they're talking about! Shitty video!
All kinds of wrong.
Lots of misinfo
😂😂😂
You showed like a 68 Buick. G s and the g t o you showed was a sixty six, not a sixty fiveYou showed like a 68 Buick. Gs and the GTO you showed was a 66, not a 65.
So many mistakes. SMH
Terrible wrong facts😂