I've been involved in felony trials for over 35 years. Every single word this gentleman says is 1,000 percent gospel, fact, truth. One of the best videos I've ever seen.
As a retired law enforcement trainer this gentleman explains this topic in a simple and easily understood manner. It’s never about being able to shoot, it’s when you should or shouldn’t. The problem is the nano second you have to make that decision .
Great stuff as always! Extremely valuable and informative. CT is not only tier 1 when it comes to training but the wisdom that he provides (and Paul Sharp) is unmatched. I always make my son watch your videos because truly good people is who I believe he should surround himself with, even if he is 19 and can be a fart sometimes :) Kids am I right! A genuine thank you from us here in North Carolina 🤙🤙
Every GunTuber wants to talk, shoot or review guns but no one ever talks about gun laws or knife laws during self defence or in a real life situation. We need more education on this. What good is it to train in weapons if you dont know when to use them in the correct legal manner. We need more videos like this and if possible for every state.
I am about to sue Riverside County and California for their unconstitutional CCW scheme in Federal Court. I was denied my CCW after appeal and I'm an FFL, I have an out-of-state CCW, I'm a range safety officer, I'm well trained, no drug or mental health history, and i can buy firearms and pass a NICS background check. I also have a letter from the DOJ and NICS saying i can Buy, possess and carry firearms but since Chad Bianco and his CCW unit didn't like me for whatever reason my right to carry is now infringed based on Arbitrary Rules and Subjective Standards against The Bruen decision and other SCOTUS rulings. I was told my case is a winner but i just need to find an attorney who is willing to start this with me. I asked AI if Riverside County CCW scheme was Unconstitutional. This is what it said....... The key question revolves around whether Riverside County’s CCW scheme complies with constitutional standards post-Bruen. The Supreme Court emphasized that rights protected by the Second Amendment should not require individuals to demonstrate special needs or burdensome criteria imposed by state or local governments. Good Cause Requirement: The requirement for applicants to show “good cause” is now viewed as overly restrictive and likely unconstitutional based on the precedent set by Bruen. This suggests that any similar requirement in Riverside County would face significant legal challenges. Subjective Criteria: The use of subjective assessments regarding an applicant’s moral character raises further concerns about constitutionality. Legal experts have pointed out that such criteria could lead to arbitrary decisions and discrimination against certain groups of people. Recent Injunctions: The permanent injunction against discouraging non-citizens from applying indicates judicial recognition of broader access rights under the Second Amendment, which may extend to all lawful residents regardless of citizenship status. Given these factors, it is reasonable to conclude that aspects of Riverside County’s CCW scheme are indeed unconstitutional as they conflict with both the spirit and letter of recent Supreme Court rulings regarding gun rights. Conclusion Based on these considerations, the Riverside County CCW scheme is likely unconstitutional, particularly concerning its previous requirements for demonstrating good cause and other subjective assessments related to moral character. That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some CCW issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes. To prove my point if you're a Riverside County Resident who was denied contact CRPA and ask them to start a case against Riverside County or to file a Writ of Mandate and they will turn you down. Why did they choose to sue Los Angeles and refuse to sue Riverside? Too much money being made. Look it up. Earlier this year Riverside County Sheriff held a CCW Symposium and guess who was to benefit from all the money made at the event? You guessed it, CRPA!!! This is a conflict of interest for CRPA members paying dues in Riverside. We don't want our 2A organizations to be in bed with Tyrants for monetary gain. Our rights are being sold at a high price gentlemen. They need to be stopped. They need to be sued.
About $100 worth... I'm F'd! To make it worse, I've always had the natural protector mindset! Without thought of myself my instinct is to help and protect others
Love how every self defense insurance say their plan is the best. I’ve been a member of a couple and thank god I never had to use them, but I find it funny each compares their service to others saying they’re top tier coverage.
When you need this kind of educated and experienced lawyer to keep from going to jail in a clear self-defense case then you know the judicial system is fucked.
Great segment. In IL, the cook county sheriff taught the following: IMOP - IL has the first 3 - Intent (I am going to kill you) - Means (they have a butcher knife) - Opportunity - happening now - Preclusion (not a requirement in IL) - Disparity of force
I wonder about a life threatening fast attack with a weapon, it fails and do not follow up with a 2nd attack, then they walk away 20 yards loitering around. When the victim goes to leave the perp. approaches again but stops just at the victim's extended fingertips. Question: would it have been legal to attack with weapon at the 2nd approach?
@CarryTrainer to be more explicit, that happened to me. A guy threw a 3" diameter round white birch "club " at my face from across a fire at night. Very close. Because he did not like the respectful political discourse I was having with my friend and property owner. Guy was drunk, but coordinated drunk. I dropped into a deep squat under the birch covering my head if it came downwards. I popped up expecting and he walked away. I waited for him to be at enough distance to walk to the driveway to get out. He walked to me, I fenced out my arms and hands, he stopped at my finger tips without touching. Telling him I am leaving. I had always figured if I burned him down I would still be guilty because the threat had ended. But always wondered because he had nearly hurt or killed me with a weapon in front of witnesses how was I to know there was not a second attempt. Will never know, all turned out oaky enough. And I figured if gone another way, at best it would be in court.
@CarryTrainer I wanted to see it because it's a shooting hold that I use and there's no name for it. I don't see anyone ever use my preferred grip method
Oh come on. Obviously Brian Malinowski grabbed an evil-black rifle and went to the ATF office where he set out to murder the agents. If he’d simply been home minding his own business or even fired a warning shot into floor in front of invaders in his home - he would have been perfectly safe.... right?
I am sorry, how do I sign up for Ur carry insurance, please ? You said I believe if I understand $9 per month for 5yrs. I have questions. How do I get in touch with you?
I had a talk with a defense attorney about this very subject years ago. The only reason you're ever justified in pulling that firearm is if someone is actively trying to kill you or family member or friend. "Actively trying to kill you". Everything else is a crap shoot.
For $300.00 a year to protect your assets is small change ! If you spend $ 1,000.00 for a hand gun and back off on the premium of $300 to protect yourself; you’re foolish. Or keep it in the box or in your home.
Good info but i think it sucks that all case are looked at the way and because of that you can end up in prison sounds like the justice system just has a revolving door like convict imprison, convict imprison, screw the details
Note regardless if you go to he best so called lawyer, your defense is literally in your hands. Judges are arrogant tyrants, prosecutors are usually lawyers in training and are heartless bastards going for any type of conviction or plea bargain to feed the system. The likelihood of your defense lawyer educating on what what to wear what not say, investigating deeper into your case like movies is zero. Carrying a gun means walk away, sticks & stones will break my bones, names will never happen. It is only for the unexpected situation of life & death. Carrying a gun and brandishing it as a deterrent makes you the criminal on the way to prison. Cops are public enemy number one. They are corrupt and liars with legal protection to use tyrannical force. You can’t talk yourself out of jail. Take the 5th, call lawyers, and ask for medical help. After a shooting the stress could cause a heart attack & uncontrolled hypertension. America is not free and your right to carry comes at an astronomical cost that nobody appreciates. As this lawyer stated, pulling a gun in self defense a life or death situation may cost $300,000 dollars or more. And if you have so called defense insurance read the fine print. You may think your covered & your not. Get all your assets into a trust.
Not all judges are tyrants. Not all prosecutors are newbies. I have friends who are both and they are honorable people. The fact is, the individuals who often get caught up, did somethings they shouldn't.
@ I’m glad you’re a believer. Happy for you. Lawyers learn the law to circumvent it. To manipulate it. There are no ethics among lawyers. Judges believe tat their court room is their domain and they dictate their version of law. There is no connection to truth or justice. Any man or woman who faces a court in this country is lucky that there is a jury system. This takes away much of the potential tyrannical behavior of the Judge. Note a jury rarely sees all the information that was privy to the lawyers or judges. Every second a lawyer spends on you is charged for. Legal malpractice is rampant but rarely is taken to court as no lawyer wants to sue another lawyer. But I’m happy that you are a believer. May you never need to rely on a lawyer or the legal system.
Same here, I don't own any guns much less carry one. As long as communist cops keep arresting innocent people for protecting themselves family and property.
So according to this video "innocent people go to jail all the time" yet the "right to life" crowd are in favor of the death penalty? something ain't adding up here...
@@CarryTrainer If innocent people go to jail and are wrongly convicted of a capital crime such a murder, which happens more frequently than most people realize, that would be a strong argument against the death penalty wouldn't it? Yet it seems a large segment of the right to life crowd are religious conservatives who own guns and support the death penalty which is incongruent isn't it?
I’m here to listen
EVERY AMERICAN, who decides to carry a gun for self protection, needs to listen to this podcast!
Priceless advice. Thank you.
This should be taught in every school in America !
I've been involved in felony trials for over 35 years. Every single word this gentleman says is 1,000 percent gospel, fact, truth. One of the best videos I've ever seen.
As a retired law enforcement trainer this gentleman explains this topic in a simple and easily understood manner. It’s never about being able to shoot, it’s when you should or shouldn’t. The problem is the nano second you have to make that decision
.
Indeed
As always, Mr. Branca is outstanding. He is the "Top Gun" of Law the law of Self defense.
Atty Branca provides Excellent, valuable content!!!
25:40 thanks so much for the information God bless America n carry trainer n the s12 family 26:18
I'm here to learn as much as I can.
MUST know.
7:15 The reason I'll never intervene in someone else's situation.
Great stuff as always! Extremely valuable and informative. CT is not only tier 1 when it comes to training but the wisdom that he provides (and Paul Sharp) is unmatched. I always make my son watch your videos because truly good people is who I believe he should surround himself with, even if he is 19 and can be a fart sometimes :) Kids am I right! A genuine thank you from us here in North Carolina 🤙🤙
A+++ video Micky!!!
Excellent Mick
This was a wonderful video
Thanks for posting this
Great content
Great content eye opening
I'm loving it
Every GunTuber wants to talk, shoot or review guns but no one ever talks about gun laws or knife laws during self defence or in a real life situation. We need more education on this. What good is it to train in weapons if you dont know when to use them in the correct legal manner. We need more videos like this and if possible for every state.
Not only that but every Gun Tuber is a cop boot leaker. They are suffering from Stockholm disorder
I’m locking that bit of information into my memory banks.
I am about to sue Riverside County and California for their unconstitutional CCW scheme in Federal Court. I was denied my CCW after appeal and I'm an FFL, I have an out-of-state CCW, I'm a range safety officer, I'm well trained, no drug or mental health history, and i can buy firearms and pass a NICS background check. I also have a letter from the DOJ and NICS saying i can Buy, possess and carry firearms but since Chad Bianco and his CCW unit didn't like me for whatever reason my right to carry is now infringed based on Arbitrary Rules and Subjective Standards against The Bruen decision and other SCOTUS rulings. I was told my case is a winner but i just need to find an attorney who is willing to start this with me.
I asked AI if Riverside County CCW scheme was Unconstitutional. This is what it said.......
The key question revolves around whether Riverside County’s CCW scheme complies with constitutional standards post-Bruen. The Supreme Court emphasized that rights protected by the Second Amendment should not require individuals to demonstrate special needs or burdensome criteria imposed by state or local governments.
Good Cause Requirement: The requirement for applicants to show “good cause” is now viewed as overly restrictive and likely unconstitutional based on the precedent set by Bruen. This suggests that any similar requirement in Riverside County would face significant legal challenges.
Subjective Criteria: The use of subjective assessments regarding an applicant’s moral character raises further concerns about constitutionality. Legal experts have pointed out that such criteria could lead to arbitrary decisions and discrimination against certain groups of people.
Recent Injunctions: The permanent injunction against discouraging non-citizens from applying indicates judicial recognition of broader access rights under the Second Amendment, which may extend to all lawful residents regardless of citizenship status.
Given these factors, it is reasonable to conclude that aspects of Riverside County’s CCW scheme are indeed unconstitutional as they conflict with both the spirit and letter of recent Supreme Court rulings regarding gun rights.
Conclusion
Based on these considerations, the Riverside County CCW scheme is likely unconstitutional, particularly concerning its previous requirements for demonstrating good cause and other subjective assessments related to moral character.
That's the thing about it. Most "2A Organizations" have no interest in overturning permitting schemes especially in California. They are affiliated with, have holdings or just make way too much money to overturn the CCW Permitting Schemes. It's literally a giant money grab due to Training, application fees, mental evaluations, and attorneys making money off CCW Appeals for denials. In California an attorney will charge $5000 to $10,000 dollars for a CCW Denial Appeal. Do you think they want to overturn the CCW permitting system? Also in California some CCW issuing agencies use private companies like PERMITIUM to process applications with a standard fee of $125+. Think about it. If you charge $125 and your PRIVATE company processes 100,000 new applications and another 150,000 renewals every year your PRIVATE company is making $62,500,000 every year just processing applications. Then add training, psych evaluations and other fees, you'll see they are making money hands over fist. I would volunteer for a 2A organization and I saw first hand how many in leadership either are CCW trainers or involved with companies that provide training. Michele and Associates do not work pro Bono for members and are one of the ones charging $10,000 just to start an appeal with other fees piling up. Our rights are being sold at a high price and no one wants to do anything about it. I'm looking for an attorney who would use my case and my denial to overturn California's Unconstitutional CCW scheme but not one has any interest. I'm an FFL, highly trained in firearms, range safety officer, DOJ confirmed I can own, possess and buy firearms, no drug or mental health history and nothing in my record that makes me a disqualified person yet the courts still used false allegations from my ex wife and a dismissed case to use towards my denial. The paperwork filed against me using false allegations said "PROSECUTOR REFUSAL" because the investigator knew she was high on drugs and full of crap using the system to try to get back at me for leaving her after she abused my daughter and I found her stash of meth, heroin and syringes.
To prove my point if you're a Riverside County Resident who was denied contact CRPA and ask them to start a case against Riverside County or to file a Writ of Mandate and they will turn you down. Why did they choose to sue Los Angeles and refuse to sue Riverside? Too much money being made. Look it up. Earlier this year Riverside County Sheriff held a CCW Symposium and guess who was to benefit from all the money made at the event? You guessed it, CRPA!!! This is a conflict of interest for CRPA members paying dues in Riverside. We don't want our 2A organizations to be in bed with Tyrants for monetary gain.
Our rights are being sold at a high price gentlemen. They need to be stopped. They need to be sued.
Thanks for sharing!
So if it costs several hundred thousand dollars then it would be fair to say money buys justice
sad thing is our government has deep pockets to use against the citizen of America. Yes we are priced out of our legal system.
How much justice can you afford?
About $100 worth... I'm F'd! To make it worse, I've always had the natural protector mindset! Without thought of myself my instinct is to help and protect others
Excellent info👍🏼👊🏼
Love how every self defense insurance say their plan is the best. I’ve been a member of a couple and thank god I never had to use them, but I find it funny each compares their service to others saying they’re top tier coverage.
I'm pretty sure this is how any business works.
Welcome to the world of commerce, lol
Insurance companies are a scam. They will do everything they can to leave their customers in the lurch.
I have CCW for the reasons you indicated and Carry Trainers Recommendation.
When you need this kind of educated and experienced lawyer to keep from going to jail in a clear self-defense case then you know the judicial system is fucked.
The only lawyer I'm going to listen to has years of experience trying self defense cases in my state.
Sometimes ask for a bench trial but that depends on the judge and your atty's advice.
Come to South Dakota, Colorado, Nebraska area please.
How andnwhere do i sign up??
This is all fine and dandy in states/cities that are mostly pro 2nd amendment. They actually follow the law.
@@kylewood8327 listen to the whole thing
Great segment.
In IL, the cook county sheriff taught the following:
IMOP - IL has the first 3
- Intent (I am going to kill you)
- Means (they have a butcher knife)
- Opportunity - happening now
- Preclusion (not a requirement in IL)
- Disparity of force
Are you only in Tennessee?
Do you ever come to wa. State?
Sad thing is were not allowed to do self defense in canada
How do we take advantage of this offer?
I wonder about a life threatening fast attack with a weapon, it fails and do not follow up with a 2nd attack, then they walk away 20 yards loitering around. When the victim goes to leave the perp. approaches again but stops just at the victim's extended fingertips.
Question: would it have been legal to attack with weapon at the 2nd approach?
Why not just leave? Why would you possibly stay in a situation that required force? These are the things that get people locked up.
@CarryTrainer to be more explicit, that happened to me. A guy threw a 3" diameter round white birch "club " at my face from across a fire at night. Very close. Because he did not like the respectful political discourse I was having with my friend and property owner. Guy was drunk, but coordinated drunk. I dropped into a deep squat under the birch covering my head if it came downwards. I popped up expecting and he walked away. I waited for him to be at enough distance to walk to the driveway to get out. He walked to me, I fenced out my arms and hands, he stopped at my finger tips without touching. Telling him I am leaving.
I had always figured if I burned him down I would still be guilty because the threat had ended. But always wondered because he had nearly hurt or killed me with a weapon in front of witnesses how was I to know there was not a second attempt.
Will never know, all turned out oaky enough. And I figured if gone another way, at best it would be in court.
@@CarryTrainer”The victim goes to leave” and the perp comes back an apparent 2nd attempt.
@@gungadingo leave if you're leaving
i love america
0:02 what video is the one where you're in the orange sweater??? I tried looking for it and can't find it
@jason200912 we haven't shared that video yet
@CarryTrainer I wanted to see it because it's a shooting hold that I use and there's no name for it. I don't see anyone ever use my preferred grip method
Innocence is on the list, and that means that you were not the aggressor, you didn't start it. Then how can police breaking in claim self defense?
Oh come on. Obviously Brian Malinowski grabbed an evil-black rifle and went to the ATF office where he set out to murder the agents. If he’d simply been home minding his own business or even fired a warning shot into floor in front of invaders in his home - he would have been perfectly safe.... right?
Because you may have dome something that strips that innocence or someone in the system may not see the facts of the case as you did
Because they are not your friends. They are the enemy of the people.
Its a money racket oops I mean system.
If your not a member I can't help you.
A PLATINUM member
@@UncleDanBand64 do you work for free?
@CarryTrainer not if I can help it
I am sorry, how do I sign up for
Ur carry insurance, please ?
You said I believe if I understand $9 per month for 5yrs.
I have questions.
How do I get in touch with you?
Visit @lawofselfdefense
@CarryTrainer i can't find his five year program????
The level of danger from another human is really unknown. Train mma for one class, and you know.
I had a talk with a defense attorney about this very subject years ago. The only reason you're ever justified in pulling that firearm is if someone is actively trying to kill you or family member or friend. "Actively trying to kill you". Everything else is a crap shoot.
I'd rather be tried by 12 than carried by 6 .
For $300.00 a year to protect your assets is small change ! If you spend $ 1,000.00 for a hand gun and back off on the premium of $300 to protect yourself; you’re foolish. Or keep it in the box or in your home.
Today it's not longer hard and easy to convict for prosecutors in this era. Now they take cases for personal political beliefs too
USCCA: how to go to prison while paying monthly to do so.
Lawyers on Retainer for the win.
The easiest way to survive a gun fight is not be involved in one.
USA USA USA
Wear a bullet proof vest it’s a pain but stops knives and bullets
USA not Canada
Good info but i think it sucks that all case are looked at the way and because of that you can end up in prison sounds like the justice system just has a revolving door like convict imprison, convict imprison, screw the details
Most of the time there is something at play that shouldn't have been done.
Check this out
ua-cam.com/video/udpoQz0fvys/v-deo.htmlsi=wEEQDleE149m0QSa
As usual it costs money to defend yourself
Note regardless if you go to he best so called lawyer, your defense is literally in your hands. Judges are arrogant tyrants, prosecutors are usually lawyers in training and are heartless bastards going for any type of conviction or plea bargain to feed the system. The likelihood of your defense lawyer educating on what what to wear what not say, investigating deeper into your case like movies is zero. Carrying a gun means walk away, sticks & stones will break my bones, names will never happen. It is only for the unexpected situation of life & death. Carrying a gun and brandishing it as a deterrent makes you the criminal on the way to prison. Cops are public enemy number one. They are corrupt and liars with legal protection to use tyrannical force. You can’t talk yourself out of jail. Take the 5th, call lawyers, and ask for medical help. After a shooting the stress could cause a heart attack & uncontrolled hypertension. America is not free and your right to carry comes at an astronomical cost that nobody appreciates. As this lawyer stated, pulling a gun in self defense a life or death situation may cost $300,000 dollars or more. And if you have so called defense insurance read the fine print. You may think your covered & your not. Get all your assets into a trust.
Not all judges are tyrants. Not all prosecutors are newbies. I have friends who are both and they are honorable people. The fact is, the individuals who often get caught up, did somethings they shouldn't.
@ I’m glad you’re a believer. Happy for you. Lawyers learn the law to circumvent it. To manipulate it. There are no ethics among lawyers. Judges believe tat their court room is their domain and they dictate their version of law. There is no connection to truth or justice. Any man or woman who faces a court in this country is lucky that there is a jury system. This takes away much of the potential tyrannical behavior of the Judge. Note a jury rarely sees all the information that was privy to the lawyers or judges. Every second a lawyer spends on you is charged for. Legal malpractice is rampant but rarely is taken to court as no lawyer wants to sue another lawyer. But I’m happy that you are a believer. May you never need to rely on a lawyer or the legal system.
This talk makes me not to want to carry a firearm...
That's valid
Same here, I don't own any guns much less carry one. As long as communist cops keep arresting innocent people for protecting themselves
family and property.
This knowledge will be good no matter how you choose to defend yourself.
@@kevinquick4844 Agreed.
@kevinquick4844 agreed
Half the time they don’t know what they are doing! I’ve never seen so much incompetence!
So according to this video "innocent people go to jail all the time" yet the "right to life" crowd are in favor of the death penalty? something ain't adding up here...
How are these things connected?
@@CarryTrainer If innocent people go to jail and are wrongly convicted of a capital crime such a murder, which happens more frequently than most people realize, that would be a strong argument against the death penalty wouldn't it?
Yet it seems a large segment of the right to life crowd are religious conservatives who own guns and support the death penalty which is incongruent isn't it?
@@CarryTrainer It appears my response was deleted.