Get in the Upswing Lab to get access to Aaron Barone's exclusive training lessons! Use coupon code LEVELUP to save $50: upswingpoker.com/the-poker-lab-coaching
Is Jared's turn call with AQ no backdoor standard? I realize there are tons of draws that we beat but being OOP and having no interaction with the board facing this bet size isn't great for us, especially when Nick's polarized sizing implies that the river probably isn't going check/check too often.
it beats all bluffs and there's only 6 bigs in the pot on a paired board. Can't be too bad to call with AQ. Granted we'll have to x/f the non club/A/Q rivers, but you're supposed to have folds on each street!
What do you guys think about Bleznick leading river there? He called turn so essentially he’s not believing Shulman has a 9 there correct? So 5 of hearts comes river why not lead fire river there representing a slow play 9 or pocket pair? As always great content and analyzation. Thx guys!
His combo itself isn't great to lead there for a couple reasons. 1) Doesnt have a flush or straight blocker 2) Usually we want to be leading textures that favor our range, given the action/board I don't think this one qualifies 3) If he's leading out with AQ, is the plan to make Shulman fold better? Or just to not get bluffed?
Schulman with the triple barrel is now repping 9x+ here. clubs missed, T8,J8. Its not good that Bleznick has the Ac, but it was also a limped pot so less likely Schulman has an A anyway. 56 hits river, pretty unlikely he is going to bet 350k into 450k with 5x though, a smaller sizing maybe. Bleznicks hand looks straight up A high, 4x, and a ridiculously played flush draw that bricked lol
Solvers dont solve much, in my opinion. Then the other solver says something different ? Im not understanding how playing a one strict way is always right according to solvers. Llimp AQ, in the small blind is a bad play almost always
Why not? If you raise you'll probably fold out weaker hands that you could get value from post flop on some boards. Or you limp and get jammed on and you can call it off being ahead most of the time vs a big blind all in. Obviously it's not something you do every single time but mixing it up is valuable especially against stronger players
whoever is doing the captions here needs to be told that "medal" and "mettle" are different words. hehe. words, the stuff that's their job to be aware of and all.
not the same thing as "keyboard warrior" vs an input by one of say us. a closed caption's specific job is to know the language in which they're dealing with. here, that's gotta be like 6th grade or lower.
@@thebarrybarry all good baby. Appreciate the feedback though would be much more helpful if it was specific. We just recorded another one and I let him do more of the heavy lifting.
Get in the Upswing Lab to get access to Aaron Barone's exclusive training lessons! Use coupon code LEVELUP to save $50: upswingpoker.com/the-poker-lab-coaching
Great review. I will recoment Barone's study videos. They are very good. Go get upswing poker study. I did, and i love itt.
My man!
Love these videos, cheers guys! Keep em up
Is Jared's turn call with AQ no backdoor standard? I realize there are tons of draws that we beat but being OOP and having no interaction with the board facing this bet size isn't great for us, especially when Nick's polarized sizing implies that the river probably isn't going check/check too often.
it beats all bluffs and there's only 6 bigs in the pot on a paired board. Can't be too bad to call with AQ. Granted we'll have to x/f the non club/A/Q rivers, but you're supposed to have folds on each street!
If he plans on calling on better rivers, then its ok. But calling and hoping for a shutdown might be a mistake.
What do you guys think about Bleznick leading river there? He called turn so essentially he’s not believing Shulman has a 9 there correct? So 5 of hearts comes river why not lead fire river there representing a slow play 9 or pocket pair? As always great content and analyzation. Thx guys!
His combo itself isn't great to lead there for a couple reasons.
1) Doesnt have a flush or straight blocker
2) Usually we want to be leading textures that favor our range, given the action/board I don't think this one qualifies
3) If he's leading out with AQ, is the plan to make Shulman fold better? Or just to not get bluffed?
wtf is Bleznick repping if he leads river here? If you think he has 9x here then I mean, maybe poker is not for you.
how standard is the 63s defend? can we see the hrc output plz
Schulman with the triple barrel is now repping 9x+ here. clubs missed, T8,J8. Its not good that Bleznick has the Ac, but it was also a limped pot so less likely Schulman has an A anyway. 56 hits river, pretty unlikely he is going to bet 350k into 450k with 5x though, a smaller sizing maybe. Bleznicks hand looks straight up A high, 4x, and a ridiculously played flush draw that bricked lol
Solvers dont solve much, in my opinion. Then the other solver says something different ? Im not understanding how playing a one strict way is always right according to solvers. Llimp AQ, in the small blind is a bad play almost always
Why not? If you raise you'll probably fold out weaker hands that you could get value from post flop on some boards. Or you limp and get jammed on and you can call it off being ahead most of the time vs a big blind all in. Obviously it's not something you do every single time but mixing it up is valuable especially against stronger players
And saying solvers don't solve much is just wrong. Solvers have completely changed the game, especially amongst the best players
Shulman thinks he has 4x its an great/easy play by Schulman.
Very well played by Schulman, This is why you don’t play like a stain and limp AQ guys 🍻
whoever is doing the captions here needs to be told that "medal" and "mettle" are different words. hehe. words, the stuff that's their job to be aware of and all.
not the same thing as "keyboard warrior" vs an input by one of say us. a closed caption's specific job is to know the language in which they're dealing with. here, that's gotta be like 6th grade or lower.
Horrible analysis... easy x back on turn and can still bluff river
Too lengthy and boring for my level of skill.
Will do my best to be more exciting next time
Well to be fair if you normally play $1-$3 against awful players, none of this discussion applies to your games anyway. Poker is weird that way.
@@tarlkudrick1174 Doesn't apply as often, but always good to be prepared so you're ready if the situation arises
@@abarone68I mean you did great the other guy ruined the hand
Aaron is great the other dude is clueless and should just let barons break down the hand .
he's the pro! What did I get wrong?
@@mbradycf sorry man I just think Aaron breaks it down well and your trying just a bit too hard to show your knowledge . Feels bad
@@thebarrybarry all good baby. Appreciate the feedback though would be much more helpful if it was specific.
We just recorded another one and I let him do more of the heavy lifting.