@@Lynnpjjbdndji Just have a think. What have either of the two parties ever done to make your life or this country better.?🏴👍Time for a complete clear out.
Why does a guy who's Starmers age want to go to a Taylor Swift concert anyway. Isn't he a bit too long in the tooth for all that ' teenybopping ' business ?
She is a Billionaire and should be able to pay for all her SECURITY in any town she wants to play. Really, locals should not pay if they can’t afford to see the concert! Just saying😂❤
It's a catch 22... on one hand, I agree it's gross to have taxpayers cover security costs for a wealthy individual... On the other hand, the cost to taxpayers is literally MORE than covered by the tens of millions in taxes and revenue to local businesses her concert is bringing in. If she refuses to attend because she doesn't feel safe, then that's tens of millions in taxes and local business revenue and tourism lost because of it. The cost of using police, in a worst case scenario, might be couple million... but the taxes generated by the concert would far exceed that, so it's a net gain for the city.
@@Andrew-tx9jy So..she has the funds to provide her own security then.Shes an overhyped,overgrown teenager,she has no right to demand anything.Its ridiculous how this pathetic Govt seem to have treated her like bloody Cleopatra.
@@Andrew-tx9jy I would think those billions went into her bank account.If our economy is going to based upon american teeny bop idols then we are truly screwed.She should still have paid for her own security.I dont get the hype over her.
I do dislike it when someone gives an opinion but disguises it as a statement of fact - which it is not. I think she is an above average singer but an exceptional poet and musician.
Our politicians are now completely out of control, and Nandy is not a very convincing liar. Each and every one of this channel's eight million subscribers will obviously be able to see this for themselves.
I once saw a little old lady in the back of an annonmous looking Jag, with just two motorbike outriders navigating past Marble Arch and she was the Queen of England.
In saying that, myself & others drivers were forced over to the verge in the Highlands of Scotland when sleazy Bill Clinton was here writing a book apparently. If not for that carry on no-one would have known or cared but maybe that was the reason, to make him feel important. Can't stand him 🤢🤮🤮
I'll summarise the conversation: "Even though we recieved a bunch of freebies, and provided preferential treatment for the people that provided the freebies, the relationship between those things are purely coincidental, and we defienitely do not partake in any forms of bribery **wink wink**.
An average American singer with an outstanding publicity department working overtime for her. Will anyone be singing her songs in 50 years time? I really doubt it.
I would like to know if visitors to this country are ALLOWED to provide their own security. They are not allowed to be armed (but the police are) and there had been credible threats earlier.
We will never know if Sadiq Khan was also escorted to Wembley with her in the limo as he is too small to see out of the windows. That is unless he sat on a few TFL patterned cushions.
Its fair that politicians pay tax on gifts like the rest of us. Keir owes £50k in tax on gifts. Politicians should pay tax exactly the same as us. Gifts should be investigated under bribary laws when things like this arise
The cost of protecting Taylor Swift is insignificant compared with the MILLIONS of Pounds she brought to London. Probably less than the amount she gave to London's Homeless charities.
I’d rather Taylor Swift was given a blue light escort, & additional security, than that she was injured or killed, given the serious, & very real, bomb threat that her concert in Vienna had just been cancelled because of, and thank goodness it had been. I would expect any world famous (& so recently vulnerable) superstar to be appropriately protected, & if that means police, blue light escorts, so be it. Taylor was a huge asset & financially benefited the economies of every city she visited, London especially benefitted from number of shows she did. She’s a human “asset” & a fine human being & should be kept safe!
I believe this was more transport security than venue but probably had more to do with her not having to get stuck in traffic like the rest of the plebs 🤷♂ venue security should really be up to the promoters/record label in my view
@@AL-ud2is maybe we don’t know the details of the threat assessment that was made. She doesn’t publicise the details of the threats she receives, for the same reasons she never publicises which of her homes she’ll be staying in; has to have a bullet proof car & keeps wound dressings in her homes! She gets threats, has stalkers who believe they’re married to her (ffs) and has even had someone break in to her home and sleep in her bed. That’s a level of threat I can’t imagine living with. So it’s very possible there were threats made on her life that we know nothing about. I truly doubt such security would be provided just ‘cos she’s a popular musician.
I'm no fan of hers, but I think people are missing a somewhat important point here. The cost to taxpayers is literally MORE than covered by the tens of millions in taxes and revenue to local businesses plus tourism her concert is bringing in. If she refuses to attend because she doesn't feel safe, then that's tens of millions in taxes and local business revenue and tourism lost because of it. The cost of using police, in a worst case scenario, might be a couple million... but the taxes generated by the concert would far exceed that, so it's a net gain for the city. It's curious that politicians would fail to point this out, I worked for my city as a bookkeeper and anytime we had big concerts, the revenue, tourism and taxes generated by them far exceeded the extra taxpayer expenditure we had to put in place to make the events safe, clean etc. Big concerts like this 99% of the time are REALLY good for the city, financially.
The point is she should have her own security, for her own safety , MET should be providing security for the public who attend , the optics are simply they bought security with bribes .. nothing new for this sleazy government 👎🏼
Agree but it’s the sleazy freebies … and the miss use of public service that makes this turn sour. Come on Lib Dem pull your finger out and save Britain.
Since when was " she doesn't feel safe.." qualify as credible evidence that a terrorist threat existed, if one had been made the police should reveal the details and if it was thought necessary, cancel the concert for the safety of the audience! Taylor Swift is the ultimate prima donna buoyed by a sycophantic media, she thinks the world revolves around her, for instance her endorsement in the US presidential race was "eagerly" awaited, that choice may have been why the TDS suffering Mayor of London took the decision he did. He certainly doesn't care about local businesses in London so we can discount that straight away.
IT'S AMAZING HOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN EVEN CHANGE THE ENGLISH DICTIONARY NOW 🤔....I THOUGHT A " BRIBE " WAS CALLED A " BRIBE" ? NOT CALLED A " DONATION " !
What a mendacity and idolatry 😂 this pop stars are producing money for themselves and who finance them. The real entertainment and culture is not like that at all.
Sadik Khan was given tickets to Taylor Swift's concert and he agreed for the blue light police escourt despite police assessment that it was not necessary.
At the tax payers expense? Is this a joke. Was this an emergency? What could the officers in the motorcade have been doing. This has to be a joke. The police had already said she didn’t need this level of security.
@@TimComley don’t be salty coz Labour are even more sleazy then the Tory’s (which I thought was impossible lol 😂) and just see the working class like dirt! So for me , but we’re see what they do after MI5 have rang the bell 🛎 🤔🤷♂️
Operational matter for the police, what the hell is going on in this country, it is a matter for the Public to say NO to spending Public monies for those who can afford their own protection.
A security threat would come in the stadium, not halfway along the motorway surely! If they refused to escort a Prince of this country then why would they escort a multi million pop singer? Doesnt make sense unless Taylor Swift demanded it after all the free tickets the Labour party received!
Nonsense, greedy hypocrites. Amazing how they find a way to justify their greed. They all took tickets and then used influence to help the pop star. Crooks
At round about .50 onwards she seems to contradict herself...On the one hand she says the Home Sec doesnt have the power to tell the police who to provide security for,THEN she says but the Home Sec has to review the police decision....SO basically yes,the Home Sec agreed to provide the police protection!She could have said NO,its tax payers money.
The fact that this is controversial is mad. She obviously qualifies for any additional security we can give, given the threats she gets alone but the absolute magnitude of good she did for the UK is well worth the expense. In just 15 dates, she boosted the UK economy by £1 Billion. Not to mention the approx. £300,000 she personally donated to British food banks. There's never outrage about the royals getting their police escorts and motorcades depiste how often they have them, and I fully agree they should. However it takes the Royal Family about 9 months of service, with tonnes of police security throughout, to have the same economic impact Taylor Swift made in fifteen days.
I should have a police escort to walk round where i live. Its blooming dangerous.
The scary thing is they don't deny they are thieving griffters🤬🤬🤬
Who?
@@andrewjenkinson7052 modern politician's of all party's
@@andrewjenkinson7052 the liebour party of course & 2 tier 3bie kier is king of the grifters
People will judge this Labour Party rotten to the core
Some people will still vote Labour no matter what.🏴👍
@@Hunterfinn625 sad but true
The liebour party
@@Hunterfinn625 Yes we will lmao. Conservative electoral Oblivion. Lmao
@@Lynnpjjbdndji Just have a think. What have either of the two parties ever done to make your life or this country better.?🏴👍Time for a complete clear out.
Why does a guy who's Starmers age want to go to a Taylor Swift concert anyway. Isn't he a bit too long in the tooth for all that ' teenybopping ' business ?
So that Sadiq Khan can bragg, and maybe his young family would appreciate the music.
He likes em young
@@danielnorwood7023 wouldn't surprise me.
Diddy
It’s free
"I paid for my tickets" killed Nandy stone dead.
5 years of this, buckle up. God help us
10 years
@@paulie19671 early elections now, please !
@@paulie19671 3rd world war before then, old chum.
@@paulie19671 not going to happen 😂😂😂😂
14 years of absolute madness and incompetence under conservatives
Taylor is woke , Labour are woke and Wokes of a feather flock together
Embarrassing, struggling to justify their incompetence. The worst collection of MPs this country has ever had
She is a Billionaire and should be able to pay for all her SECURITY in any town she wants to play. Really, locals should not pay if they can’t afford to see the concert! Just saying😂❤
It's a catch 22... on one hand, I agree it's gross to have taxpayers cover security costs for a wealthy individual... On the other hand, the cost to taxpayers is literally MORE than covered by the tens of millions in taxes and revenue to local businesses her concert is bringing in. If she refuses to attend because she doesn't feel safe, then that's tens of millions in taxes and local business revenue and tourism lost because of it. The cost of using police, in a worst case scenario, might be couple million... but the taxes generated by the concert would far exceed that, so it's a net gain for the city.
@@HathurI agree with this. The benefit to local economies far outweigh the cost.
Some people like to moan about anything
Security is the countries responsibility not the visitor .
We dont want private armies
And if she was attacked and Londoners or concert goers were injured or killed you’d rightly be asking where the security was
@@Hathur then the people who want to attend her concert should pay - not the average tax payer
No donations, no freebies, no gifts to all MP’s and political parties.
She's NOT English so how come WE as Tax payers are footing this bill???
Why is this overgrown teenager controlling the Met police?
She provided a boost to the economy of our country to the tune of several billion so I'd say it was sound business to look after her.
@@Andrew-tx9jy So..she has the funds to provide her own security then.Shes an overhyped,overgrown teenager,she has no right to demand anything.Its ridiculous how this pathetic Govt seem to have treated her like bloody Cleopatra.
@@j.4332 Those billions in boosting went into OUR economy, without her we wouldn't have had them.
@@Andrew-tx9jy I would think those billions went into her bank account.If our economy is going to based upon american teeny bop idols then we are truly screwed.She should still have paid for her own security.I dont get the hype over her.
How does someone like this get to be Culture Secretary?
Most jammy and overrated politican of recent years.
Diversity,Equality,Inclusion.
@@TrumptonMayorShe ticks the box.
guess!
If the concert was such a security risk why did half the government and mayor of London and prime minister attend .Why wasn't the concert cancelled.
And how much was their security detail?
What a load of Tosh comes out of these MP's mouths.
This woman is clueless on any sporting issues and as for an in depth knowledge on culture??????????
She should pay for her own transportation like poor people do everyday in London, she’s a very average singer.
I do dislike it when someone gives an opinion but disguises it as a statement of fact - which it is not. I think she is an above average singer but an exceptional poet and musician.
@@andrewjenkinson7052oh please
Our politicians are now completely out of control, and Nandy is not a very convincing liar. Each and every one of this channel's eight million subscribers will obviously be able to see this for themselves.
Just Say NO To Taylor Swift ,...
I once saw a little old lady in the back of an annonmous looking Jag, with just two motorbike outriders navigating past Marble Arch and she was the Queen of England.
In saying that, myself & others drivers were forced over to the verge in the Highlands of Scotland when sleazy Bill Clinton was here writing a book apparently. If not for that carry on no-one would have known or cared but maybe that was the reason, to make him feel important. Can't stand him 🤢🤮🤮
Has anyone checked if Rowley or members of his family received any tickets ?
Declaring grift does not justify it. NO need for any politician to get free tickets and Taylor Swift can afford her own security
And that's the reason for doing so - to hold it up to scrutiny.
Considering the level of knife and general crime in London this is disgusting.
I'll summarise the conversation:
"Even though we recieved a bunch of freebies, and provided preferential treatment for the people that provided the freebies, the relationship between those things are purely coincidental, and we defienitely do not partake in any forms of bribery **wink wink**.
Spot on there mate
nicely put !
She was due to appear on Talk TV - she backed out!
Snouts in the trough guys, snouts in the trough.
Perfect quote for Our Keirs mob. 😂
And the home secretary along with the London Mayor received free tickets no doubt.
Western troll 🤣🤣🤣
Nothing to see here. Politicians behaving badly ? Shocking 🤣
Same old same old that is why hardly anyone bothers to vote anymore.......
I am 80..I have no idea who Taylor Swift is..
I only heard a a few tiny bits of her singing. Sounded ordinary to me.
Maybe it's cos she performs in her knickers? That she is popular?
Nor does the PM, but it’s free .
An average American singer with an outstanding publicity department working overtime for her. Will anyone be singing her songs in 50 years time? I really doubt it.
@@Simonsimon-fy3hq painting-by-numbers 'music', with no originality whatsoever. She'd have to pay me to watch her.
@@joeblack8915 "no originality"? Could that be why Starmer went to see her three times?
Free tickets anyone?
Labour is so twisted, they just can't help themselves
Anyone been to Wigan..? This woman's delusional
Oh come on, some of the pie shops are worth the risk! and there's the Pier...
@@Simonsimon-fy3hq Im sorry they skimp on the ingredients of chicken pie/pastie and many more I will concede pound bakery is a life saver sometimes 😅
How dare she bring up the murdered concert goers in Manchester to justify grabbing free tickets. That’s sickening.
Again she should have made her own transport security. Was this paid gor by the tax payer yet again.
I would like to know if visitors to this country are ALLOWED to provide their own security. They are not allowed to be armed (but the police are) and there had been credible threats earlier.
I hate watching TV and having that feeling I could be spat on any second
Another labour grifter !!!!
GRIFTER, without a shadow of doubt.
We will never know if Sadiq Khan was also escorted to Wembley with her in the limo as he is too small to see out of the windows. That is unless he sat on a few TFL patterned cushions.
Deflecting is not a good look. Just be honest.
I'm sure that Labour will just "shake it off" with this latest scandal.
No Swift references please...
Two Tier Keir = freebies
So Taylor Swift’s security is more important than British citizens…
chief sandrat Sad IQ insisted "his" police should do it .. wonder why
It's reported freebie Freddie Starmer accepted tickets for TWO Taylor Swift concerts. Is a Swiftie super fan the right person to be PM ?
They are treated different! So nice. Two tier interviewing also.
Its fair that politicians pay tax on gifts like the rest of us. Keir owes £50k in tax on gifts.
Politicians should pay tax exactly the same as us.
Gifts should be investigated under bribary laws when things like this arise
If Nandy wasn't an MP she'd be working in B&M.
If everything is declared why are we talking about this?
It's because it wasn't declared.
Shocking two tier freebies
Declared / undeclared.
oh to be Taylor Swift! Nady gave it multiple go's at deflecting. It's not a good idea to have a moan at Sky, though, in front of Kay Burley!
I don't recall Khan being so welcoming to Donald Trump.
The cost of protecting Taylor Swift is insignificant compared with the MILLIONS of Pounds she brought to London. Probably less than the amount she gave to London's Homeless charities.
Swiftly changed the subject!😂
Give football teams blue light ?
lol! Skynews already know that they evidence from leaks that home secretary lied intervened!!!😂😂😂😂
Nandy is another Labour Blagger.
Out of her depth.
Fair play to Kay Burley, she does an outstanding job at making me despise sky news on a daily basis.
This is what our nation has been reduced to: a supposedly serious discussion about Taylor bloody Swift. How shallow, how demeaning, how unserious.
I’d rather Taylor Swift was given a blue light escort, & additional security, than that she was injured or killed, given the serious, & very real, bomb threat that her concert in Vienna had just been cancelled because of, and thank goodness it had been. I would expect any world famous (& so recently vulnerable) superstar to be appropriately protected, & if that means police, blue light escorts, so be it. Taylor was a huge asset & financially benefited the economies of every city she visited, London especially benefitted from number of shows she did. She’s a human “asset” & a fine human being & should be kept safe!
I believe this was more transport security than venue but probably had more to do with her not having to get stuck in traffic like the rest of the plebs 🤷♂ venue security should really be up to the promoters/record label in my view
@@AL-ud2is maybe we don’t know the details of the threat assessment that was made. She doesn’t publicise the details of the threats she receives, for the same reasons she never publicises which of her homes she’ll be staying in; has to have a bullet proof car & keeps wound dressings in her homes! She gets threats, has stalkers who believe they’re married to her (ffs) and has even had someone break in to her home and sleep in her bed. That’s a level of threat I can’t imagine living with. So it’s very possible there were threats made on her life that we know nothing about. I truly doubt such security would be provided just ‘cos she’s a popular musician.
I'm no fan of hers, but I think people are missing a somewhat important point here. The cost to taxpayers is literally MORE than covered by the tens of millions in taxes and revenue to local businesses plus tourism her concert is bringing in. If she refuses to attend because she doesn't feel safe, then that's tens of millions in taxes and local business revenue and tourism lost because of it. The cost of using police, in a worst case scenario, might be a couple million... but the taxes generated by the concert would far exceed that, so it's a net gain for the city. It's curious that politicians would fail to point this out, I worked for my city as a bookkeeper and anytime we had big concerts, the revenue, tourism and taxes generated by them far exceeded the extra taxpayer expenditure we had to put in place to make the events safe, clean etc. Big concerts like this 99% of the time are REALLY good for the city, financially.
News broadcasts will not cover this because it's not Bad News.
The point is she should have her own security, for her own safety , MET should be providing security for the public who attend , the optics are simply they bought security with bribes .. nothing new for this sleazy government 👎🏼
Agree but it’s the sleazy freebies … and the miss use of public service that makes this turn sour. Come on Lib Dem pull your finger out and save Britain.
Since when was " she doesn't feel safe.." qualify as credible evidence that a terrorist threat existed, if one had been made the police should reveal the details and if it was thought necessary, cancel the concert for the safety of the audience!
Taylor Swift is the ultimate prima donna buoyed by a sycophantic media, she thinks the world revolves around her, for instance her endorsement in the US presidential race was "eagerly" awaited, that choice may have been why the TDS suffering Mayor of London took the decision he did. He certainly doesn't care about local businesses in London so we can discount that straight away.
Oh please. Lol
Did Alli get upset when Keir went to watch a young girl perform ?
This is silly.
Nandy is getting very fat -- too much good living is taking it's toll on her !!!
IT'S AMAZING HOW THE GOVERNMENT CAN EVEN CHANGE THE ENGLISH DICTIONARY NOW 🤔....I THOUGHT A " BRIBE " WAS CALLED A " BRIBE" ? NOT CALLED A " DONATION " !
Only cost her a couple of concert tickets…
Kickbacks!
What a mendacity and idolatry 😂 this pop stars are producing money for themselves and who finance them. The real entertainment and culture is not like that at all.
Please explain. I could not understand your point.
In my opinion it seems that I made pretty clear that I have a dislike of superstars 🤩
REFORM UK 🇬🇧
Sadik Khan was given tickets to Taylor Swift's concert and he agreed for the blue light police escourt despite police assessment that it was not necessary.
At the tax payers expense? Is this a joke. Was this an emergency? What could the officers in the motorcade have been doing. This has to be a joke. The police had already said she didn’t need this level of security.
Ariana Grande was not hurt remember so stop using that as an excuse.
So now we’re worrying about terra attacks 🤔🤦♂️
Grow up
@@TimComley don’t be salty coz Labour are even more sleazy then the Tory’s (which I thought was impossible lol 😂) and just see the working class like dirt! So for me , but we’re see what they do after MI5 have rang the bell 🛎 🤔🤷♂️
Operational matter for the police, what the hell is going on in this country, it is a matter for the Public to say NO to spending Public monies for those who can afford their own protection.
7:20 the relief in her voice when she could get back to the usual banter about Football!😂 This seems to be the religion of the Labour movement.
If I used company property as a favour for a client in return for tickets for an event, Id be sacked.
How can this woman sit there and defend the indefensible? She's a disgrace. God help us. We've got nearly five years of this .
A security threat would come in the stadium, not halfway along the motorway surely! If they refused to escort a Prince of this country then why would they escort a multi million pop singer? Doesnt make sense unless Taylor Swift demanded it after all the free tickets the Labour party received!
More BS from the BS party.
I am surprised that Nandy didn't get up on stage and sing " Hole in my shoe"
Nonsense, greedy hypocrites. Amazing how they find a way to justify their greed. They all took tickets and then used influence to help the pop star. Crooks
Nancy out of her depth, just a parrot talking.
Western troll 🤣🤣
Why is the cause of this risk not being discussed?
Fair play to Kay Burley for that interview...
They really believe that they are doing nothing wrong 😂
How does teenagers buying PepsiCo soda pop drinks at a concert help our economy?
Prince William sat in the stands at the Aston villa match. Obviously starmer thinks hes more important than a royal Prince.
Love it when she says she paid for her tickets lol. That smug look disappeared off Nandy's face
What a lot of nonsense. She is rich enough to pay for her security. Be real.
It wasnt for security of the public😡🤬 there was NO extra police for the public !!!!!!!!!
Never heard of this Taylor Swift fella. But whatever he does, I wish him the best. Not sure what this is all about.
Hes a big trans singer from the US,hes loved mainly by 10 year olds
At round about .50 onwards she seems to contradict herself...On the one hand she says the Home Sec doesnt have the power to tell the police who to provide security for,THEN she says but the Home Sec has to review the police decision....SO basically yes,the Home Sec agreed to provide the police protection!She could have said NO,its tax payers money.
but harry was told no he would have to pay for it
The fact that this is controversial is mad. She obviously qualifies for any additional security we can give, given the threats she gets alone but the absolute magnitude of good she did for the UK is well worth the expense.
In just 15 dates, she boosted the UK economy by £1 Billion. Not to mention the approx. £300,000 she personally donated to British food banks.
There's never outrage about the royals getting their police escorts and motorcades depiste how often they have them, and I fully agree they should. However it takes the Royal Family about 9 months of service, with tonnes of police security throughout, to have the same economic impact Taylor Swift made in fifteen days.
Who paid??
We did of course
This is awful journalism no longer a sky viewer
So what?, better use of police than being used as photo opps for Boris.
Did she just say starmer has integrity 🤣🤣🤣
THEY ALL GOT FREE TICKETS, STARMER IS UP FRONT SHE SAID DON'T MAKE ME LAUGH
What a joke comparing the Olympics to a bloody concert
Starmer open and transparent, do me a favour.
Culture 😂😂😂😂 purleassse Yvette didnt want the concert cancelled so gave Taylor her escort at our expense ffs
Labour on the take again. 5 more years of one rule for them.
Labour party are done no coming back