Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
Every historian knows. Except for Khmer people who don't know. Including Khmer academics who do not dare to accept the fact that their own country was once a colony of Thailand for over a thousand years. Since the Ayutthaya era until Siam country. Because Khmer people were given incorrect information and was brainwashed by the dictatorial government of Hun Sen. 😭😭
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king. Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.
You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king. Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.
understand khmer sorry But it's the land of Thailand Thai people have been living in the area for a long time, not relying on them. People in the area said that they were 100% Thai.
It is not Khmer art. Phimai was born before Khmer. It is an ancient Thai-KHOM art. Angkor Wat, located in Cambodia, was previously owned by the Thai-KHOM people. Thai-KHOM people created it. Khmer people are only slaves. The Khmers did not have any art or culture of their own when the Thai-KHOM power weakened, the Khmers revolted and later took over Angkor Wat. And the Phimai stone castle was the prototype for later construction of Angkor Wat. 🙏🙏☹☹
Hello cambodian do you know Indian culture? Do you know Hinduism? Do you know Pali language? Do you know Sanskrit? Do you know the Indus Valley Civilization? Where did all of this originate? The answer is India. Indian civilization is the birthplace of this civilization. A beautiful civilization could not have been created by a savage who just discovered the internet.
Crying Cambodia. All they live in thousand years ago . Angkor wat . When Cambodia way up all land lot to Thailand lao Vietnam. Haaaa . Keep crying Cambodia. Thailand lao Vietnam love to see it
You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king. Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.
It is not Khmer art. Phimai was born before Khmer. It is an ancient Thai-KHOM art. Angkor Wat, located in Cambodia, was previously owned by the Thai-KHOM people. Thai-KHOM people created it. Khmer people are only slaves. The Khmers did not have any art or culture of their own when the Thai-KHOM power weakened, the Khmers revolted and later took over Angkor Wat. And the Phimai stone castle was the prototype for later construction of Angkor Wat. 🙏🙏☹☹
Every historian knows. Except for Khmer people who don't know. Including Khmer academics who do not dare to accept the fact that their own country was once a colony of Thailand for over a thousand years. Since the Ayutthaya era until Siam country. Because Khmer people were given incorrect information and was brainwashed by the dictatorial government of Hun Sen. 😭😭
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
អរគុណពួកសៀមដែរ ដែលបានជួយថែរប្រាសាទខ្មែរបានល្អជាងខ្មែរ ... ។
ឃើញផ្ទាល់ ស្អាតមែន
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
អោយតែប្រាសាទខ្មែរនៅថៃភាគច្រើនមានពណ៍សបុររូបរាងនៅស្អាតល្អមិនសូវបាក់បែក ពិតជាសោកសោកស្តាយណាស់
គេដាក់អ្នកថែរាល់ថ្ងៃ និងមានចំនួនច្រើន
The local thai people keep these temples well maintained always as we respect angkorian varaman king. We value these culture than cambodian does.
អ្នកបុរាណវិទ្យាបរទេសបានបង្ហាញភស្តុតាងនោះ។ វត្តភីម៉ៃត្រូវបានកសាងឡើងកាលពី៣០០ឆ្នាំមុនវត្តអង្គរ។ និងសាងសង់ឡើងដោយជនជាតិថៃក្នុងសម័យនោះ។ គឺព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី1 លុះមកដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី2 ទ្រង់បានធ្វើចំណាកស្រុកមកកសាងអង្គរវត្តនៅពេលក្រោយ ដោយសារគ្រោះរាំងស្ងួត។ នៅពេលដែលប្រាសាទអង្គរត្រូវបានគេសាងសង់ ជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជាត្រូវបានគេប្រើប្រាស់ជាកម្មករ។ ប្រាសាទអង្គរមានរហូតដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទជ័យវរ្ម័នទី9។
មែនហើយ មានជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចម្នាក់ដែលបះបោរ ជននោះគឺជា ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1។ ព្រោះគាត់ជាទាសករយូរមកហើយ។ នៅពេលគេបណ្តេញជនជាតិថៃដែលបានសាងសង់ប្រាសាទអង្គរវត្ត និងជាវណ្ណៈគ្រប់គ្រងចេញពីទឹកដី។ ដូច្នេះ ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1 បានប្រកាសខ្លួនឯងថាជាស្តេចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជា។
នេះហើយជាមូលហេតុដែលវត្តភីម៉ៃត្រូវបានគេកសាងឡើងមុនវត្តអង្គរ។
ហើយមាន ប្រាសាទភ្នំរូង ផងដែរ។ វានៅប្រទេសថៃដែលចាស់ជាងវត្តអង្គរ។
ខ្មែរយេីងឆ្លងកាត់សង្គ្រាមជាច្រេីនទសវត្សរ៍ មាននរណាមេីលថៃរក្សា ថែទទួលសុខសន្តិភាពគ្មានសង្រ្គាម
Every historian knows. Except for Khmer people who don't know. Including Khmer academics who do not dare to accept the fact that their own country was once a colony of Thailand for over a thousand years. Since the Ayutthaya era until Siam country. Because Khmer people were given incorrect information and was brainwashed by the dictatorial government of Hun Sen. 😭😭
សូមឱយព្រលឹងវិញ្ញាណក្ខន្ធបុព្វការីនៃមហាបុព្វបុរស និងព្រះវិញ្ញាណក្ខន្ធនៃព្រះមហាវីរក្សត្រខ្មែរគ្រប់ជំនាន់ សូមសណ្ឋិតនៅគង់តាមថែរក្សានូវអ្វីៗទាំងឡាយជាសម្បត្តិរបស់ជាតិសាសន៍ខ្មែរនៃទ្រង់ សូមឱយបានត្រឡប់មកម្ចាស់ដើមវិញនាពេលអនាគតដ៏ខ្លីខាងមុខ
លំបាកបន្តិចហើយ
Owner is not cambodian but angkorian. Cambodian dont even know how to build it
ប្រាសាទខៅព្រះវិហានមិនគ្រប់គ្រាន់ទេ?
Too much naka okun
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
ខ្មែរបាត់បង់ទឹកដីច្រេីនណាស់មុនសម័យបារាំង នៅសម័យកសាងមហានគរ ប៉ុន្តែគង់វិលមកវិញក្នុងសង្គ្រាមលោកទីបី បានបព្ចាប់កូនខ្មែរអ្នកមានបុណ្យចេញជួយមនុស្សលោកអោយដឹងបុណ្យ និងបាតនោះហើយបានដឹងថាមហានគរខ្មែរទឹកដីអស្ចារ្យ
មិនងាយព្រោះសម័យនឹងមនុស្សអាត្មានិយមមានច្រេីនណាស់គឺមិនខ្វល់អ្វីទាំងអស់
แผนดินนี้ของคนสยาม
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king.
Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face
Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.
ហេតុអីបានប្រសាទនេះមកនៅប្រទេសថៃវិញ?
ស្ដាយណាស់ម្ចាស់ថ្លៃ។
ស្តាយ!
សោកស្តាយណាស់មើលហើយស្រក់ទឹកភ្នែក
សោកស្តាយ
ខ្មែរយេីងភាគច្រើន ទាល់តែបាត់បង់ទេីបនឹកស្តាយក្រោយ
មិនបាច់ប្រាប់ក៏ដឹងថាជារបស់ខ្មែរដែរ ព្រោះក្បូរក្បាច់រាចនាមិនខុសពីប្រសាទអង្គរវត្តឡើយ🇰🇭♥️
ចុកចាប់ណាស់😢😢😢😢😢🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
ยินดีต้อนรับ
ប្រែថាម៉េចទៅលោក?
សោកស្តាយណាស់សម្បិត្តរបស់ខ្មែរពិតៗ ប្រែក្លាយទៅជារបស់គេទៅវិញ🙁🙁🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽💐💐💐🇰🇭❤️🇰🇭
អតីតហួស ជួសដោយការត្រូវរឹងមាំថែរបស់ដែលកំពុងមានស្រាប់
You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king.
Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face
Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.
ចងបានវិញណាស់
ហ៊ឺ!
understand khmer sorry But it's the land of Thailand Thai people have been living in the area for a long time, not relying on them. People in the area said that they were 100% Thai.
មេីលហេីយស្រណោះណាស់
ចាស
ស្តាយណាស់
ស្តាយមែន!
សូមលោកអ្នកមេត្តាជួយសម្រួលពាក្យប្រាសាទភ្នំរូង អតីតប្រាសាទដូនតាខ្មែរ បច្ចុប្បន្នថៃយកទឹកដីខ្មែរ មិនមែនពាក្យថាបច្ចុប្បន្នក្នុងទឺកដីថៃទេ អរគុណ
តាមដែលខ្ញុំដឹងមក ការបាត់បង់ទឹកដីខ្មែរទៅដៃសៀមនេះ នៅក្នុងសម័យសង្រ្គាមខ្លះ និងក្នុងសម័យបារាំងខ្លះ(ការកាត់កងខេត្តគ្នាទៅវិញទៅមក)។
ល្អណាស់បង
Thanks!
ប្រាសាទអង្គរតូចមួយឆ្នាំព្រះអាទិត្យរះចំកពូលពីរដង នៅប្រាសាទភ្នំរូងរះចាក់ក្លោងទ្វារទាំង១៦ដែរ ពិតជាស្ថាបត្យកម្មអច្ឆរិយមែន បើនៅក្នុងប្រទេសខ្មែរទាំងពីរមិនល្អប៉ុណ្ណាទេ តែគួរឲ្យស្តាយមួយបែរជាបច្ចុប្បន្នស្ថិតក្នុងប្រទេសគេទៅវិញ😳
នេះហៅថាស្តាយម្យ៉ាង និងសំណាងម្យ៉ាង។ សំណាងម្យ៉ាងគឺប្រាសាទនេះនៅមិនឆ្ងាយពីស្រុកខ្មែរយើងឡើយ ចេញតែពីច្រកអូរស្មាច់ទៅមួយម៉ោងនឹងដល់ហើយ។ បើកូនខ្មែរពិតជាចង់ឃើញប្រាសាទដូនតាខ្មែរប្រាកដមែន ច្បាស់ជានឹងបានទៅដល់។
It is not Khmer art. Phimai was born before Khmer. It is an ancient Thai-KHOM art. Angkor Wat, located in Cambodia, was previously owned by the Thai-KHOM people. Thai-KHOM people created it. Khmer people are only slaves. The Khmers did not have any art or culture of their own when the Thai-KHOM power weakened, the Khmers revolted and later took over Angkor Wat. And the Phimai stone castle was the prototype for later construction of Angkor Wat. 🙏🙏☹☹
ស្ដាយណាស់😫😫
ប្រាសាទនឹងមែនដែលថៃថតរឿង នាគី ហើយភូមិជើងព្រៃមានពិតមែនអត់ ?
ចាស ប្រាសាទហ្នឹងហើយដែលថៃថតរឿងនាគី
ស្តាយណាស់😓
មែនហើយ
ការបាត់បង់ប្រាសាទ ដោយមូលហេតុខ្មែរ
មិនចេះសាមគ្គីគ្នា គិតតែដណ្តើម អំណាចគ្នា
គួរ ឲ សោកស្តាយណាស់
ស្តាយមែន
តើចំណាយប្រាក់ប៉ុន្មានបើយើងធ្វើតំណើរពីច្រកអូស្មាច់?
មិនច្រីនទេ
នៅខេត្តបុរីរាម ចូលពីព្រំដែនខ្មែរទៅប្រហែល ៥០ គីឡូម៉ែត្រ។
@@phuongsophat4891 😍😘
@@kongchhaykuan5611 អរគុណ!
ឈឺចាប់ពេកក្រៃ គ្មានអ្វីប្រៀបស្មើ
ហ៊ឺ!
អរគុណបង
😘
ខ្មែរយើងបាត់បង់ច្រើនណាស់បង
ចាស
Like so Much temple khmer on the world 💗💓👍
😘
អ្នកបុរាណវិទ្យាបរទេសបានបង្ហាញភស្តុតាងនោះ។ វត្តភីម៉ៃត្រូវបានកសាងឡើងកាលពី៣០០ឆ្នាំមុនវត្តអង្គរ។ និងសាងសង់ឡើងដោយជនជាតិថៃក្នុងសម័យនោះ។ គឺព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី1 លុះមកដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី2 ទ្រង់បានធ្វើចំណាកស្រុកមកកសាងអង្គរវត្តនៅពេលក្រោយ ដោយសារគ្រោះរាំងស្ងួត។ នៅពេលដែលប្រាសាទអង្គរត្រូវបានគេសាងសង់ ជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជាត្រូវបានគេប្រើប្រាស់ជាកម្មករ។ ប្រាសាទអង្គរមានរហូតដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទជ័យវរ្ម័នទី9។
មែនហើយ មានជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចម្នាក់ដែលបះបោរ ជននោះគឺជា ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1។ ព្រោះគាត់ជាទាសករយូរមកហើយ។ នៅពេលគេបណ្តេញជនជាតិថៃដែលបានសាងសង់ប្រាសាទអង្គរវត្ត និងជាវណ្ណៈគ្រប់គ្រងចេញពីទឹកដី។ ដូច្នេះ ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1 បានប្រកាសខ្លួនឯងថាជាស្តេចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជា។
នេះហើយជាមូលហេតុដែលវត្តភីម៉ៃត្រូវបានគេកសាងឡើងមុនវត្តអង្គរ។
ហើយមាន ប្រាសាទភ្នំរូង ផងដែរ។ វានៅប្រទេសថៃដែលចាស់ជាងវត្តអង្គរ។
There are many constructions like this in Thailand.
Yes
បើនៅប្រទេសខ្មែរបាក់បែកអស់ហើយ
😢
ដោយសារសង្គ្រាមផ្ទៃក្នុង គ្មានអ្នកថែរក្សាជួសជុលទេ គឺមានតែជនខិលខូចក្នុងជួរគូជំលោះប្រដាប់អាវុធទាំងសងខាងហ្នឹងជាអ្នកគាស់កកាយបំផ្លាញប្រាសាទថែមទៀតដើម្បីរុករកវត្ថុ រូបសំណាក់បុរាណទៅលក់ឲ្យបរទេស ពិសេសសៀមនោះឯងជាអ្នកប្រមូលទិញ ដោយសារពេលនោះប្រាសាទនៅស្រុកយើងមិនទាន់បានចុះបញ្ជីជាបេតិកភ័ណ្ឌពិភពលោកនៅឡើយ។
ខ្មែរសម័យនេះបានត្រឹមតែមហាថោកឬាបគឺវាអញ្ចឹងហើយ ។
កាលណា GDP ខ្មែរស្មើនឹងអាមេរិកប្រសាទនិងវិលត្រឡប់មកវិញ។
អ្ហូ!
សោកស្ដាយណាស់😢😢😢
ចាស
ក្មេងៗ វារើស បានលុយ តិចឮច្រើន ក៏ ដោយ័ វាក៌ដើ រ មចាស្ស់ ដើមបីសង់ វិញ. ដ ប្រសាត្រ គេរ មិច យើងមិន សងទៅគេរ ប្រែជា ទៅ ទុក ធ្វើ ទ្រព្ប របោះ ខ្លួនឯង ចឹង ❓❓❓❓❓❓❓
ឈឺចាប់ណាស់បាត់ទាំងប្រាសាទបាត់ទាំងទឹកដី🥺🥺
😢😓
បាត់ថែមទាំងដែនសមុទ្រ រ៉ែក្រោមដី ប្រជាជនខ្មែរអ្នកចេះដឹងសម័យនោះវាគៀរយកទៅទៀតប្រូ
@@phuongsophat4891 សម្លាប់ដោយ ប៉ុល ពត
เราผายแพร่ต้องเสียแผนดินไป
សូមជួសម្រួលជាភាសាខ្មែរផង! អរគុណ!
😢😢😢😢😢😢
😳😢
😍😘
Thanks!
បានត្រឹមតែស្ដាយ
ចាស
ថាបិច សត្សទី19 😔😔😔😔
មែនហើយ សព្វថ្ងៃខ្មែរសិរិន្ទ បុរីរ៉ាំ ឧប៊ុនជាដើម នៅនិយាយខ្មែរទេកន្លែងខ្លះ។
សូមបញ្ជាក់ពីពេលវេលាដែលបាត់បងអោយច្បាស់តិតបងបង 🙏🏿
@@denrathana3286 ស.វ. ទី១៩(ឆ្នាំមួយពាន់ប្រាំបីរយប្លាយ)
@@kongchhaykuan5611 អគុណ
@@denrathana3286 ស្តាយ!
ប្រហាក់ប្រហែល ប្រាសាទបន្ទាយសំរ៉ែ
😍😘🌷
Hello cambodian do you know Indian culture? Do you know Hinduism? Do you know Pali language? Do you know Sanskrit? Do you know the Indus Valley Civilization? Where did all of this originate? The answer is India. Indian civilization is the birthplace of this civilization. A beautiful civilization could not have been created by a savage who just discovered the internet.
Why
ព្រោះតែសង្គ្រាម
😭😭😭😭
🇰🇭🇰🇭♥️♥️
🥺😢😭
🇰🇭🇰🇭🇰🇭😭😭😭😭
😭😭🇰🇭🇰🇭💪
ចោសៀមចង់រ៉ាយ់
ចោរសៀម
យើងខ្សោយ
เขมรกระจอกอุปโลกน์ว่าตัวเองเป็นขอมโบราณ
Crying Cambodia. All they live in thousand years ago . Angkor wat . When Cambodia way up all land lot to Thailand lao Vietnam. Haaaa . Keep crying Cambodia. Thailand lao Vietnam love to see it
រឹងមាំឡើងCambodia!
You try carefully going back and reading. Nothing mentions Khmer at all. Read carefully the Prasat Hin Phimai. All around area are surrounded by ancient building date back to 11th or 12th century and in presumption this place ws built by one of Khmer's king his name is Jayavarman I. So, King Jayavarman not Khmer but he is the ancient Thai-KHOM king. Not a Khmer king.
Historian that studied about Phimai historical site said that these buildings are the same architecture technique as Angkor Wat in Cambodia. Of course, because the Phimai stone temple was the prototype of the later Angkor Wat, only 900 years old. But Prasat Hin Phimai is more than 1000 years old. Prasat Hin Phimai is a grand palace that center this historical site. It's one of the ancient palace that still in perfect condition compare to the other palace from the same era. Unlike the other palace from the same era that was built to face
Finally, he concluded about the Khmer art. Because Khmer art has its roots from ancient Thai-KHOM art original.
It is not Khmer art. Phimai was born before Khmer. It is an ancient Thai-KHOM art. Angkor Wat, located in Cambodia, was previously owned by the Thai-KHOM people. Thai-KHOM people created it. Khmer people are only slaves. The Khmers did not have any art or culture of their own when the Thai-KHOM power weakened, the Khmers revolted and later took over Angkor Wat. And the Phimai stone castle was the prototype for later construction of Angkor Wat. 🙏🙏☹☹
Every historian knows. Except for Khmer people who don't know. Including Khmer academics who do not dare to accept the fact that their own country was once a colony of Thailand for over a thousand years. Since the Ayutthaya era until Siam country. Because Khmer people were given incorrect information and was brainwashed by the dictatorial government of Hun Sen. 😭😭
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
ខ្មែរបាត់បង់ទឹកដីច្រេីនណាស់សម័យបារាំង
😗
បាត់មុនបារាំងទៅទៀត បានបារាំងមកជួយទាមទារយកខេត្តបានខ្លះដូចជា បាត់ដំបង សៀមរាប ពោធិ៍សាត់ ម្លូព្រៃ(ព្រះវិហារ) ស្ទឹងត្រែង តែដូរខេត្តត្រាត, ច័ន្ទថាបុរីជាប់សមុទ្រឲ្យទៅសៀមវិញដែលធ្វើឲ្យខ្មែរបាត់បង់ដែនសមុទ្រយ៉ាងធំ។ សៀមឆ្លាតវាដូរយកតែខេត្តជាប់សមុទ្រទេ បេះនឹងធ្វើឲ្យខ្មែរបាត់បង់ដែនសមុទ្ររលីង។ នឹកឡើងរឿងចាស់គឺសោកស្តាយខ្លាំងណាស់។ ខ្មែរត្រូវតែចងចាំទាំងអាខាងកើតទាំងអាខាងលិច!
@@phuongsophat4891 និយាយរួមទឹកដីខ្មែរ៨០% ត្រូវបារាំងកាត់អោយទៅសៀម យួន និងឡាវ សូមផ្តាំទៅកូនខ្មែរជំនាន់ក្រោយកុំយកបរទេសមកត្រួតក្បាលអោយសោះប្រយត្ន័ស្រលះដៃធេង ,ដូនតាក្មែរជំនាន់មហានគរខំច្បាំងដេីម្បីការពារទឹកដីសុវណ្ណភូមិប៉ុន្តែក្រោយសម័មហានគរគ្រប់យ៉ាងបានបាត់បង់ម្តងបន្តិចៗរហូតក្មែរនៅសលទឹកដីតែ២០%តែប៉ុណ្ណោះពេលបច្ចុប្បន្ននេះ! គួរអោយស្រណោះណាស់ដោយសារស្តេចខ្មែរសម័យក្រោយមហានគរចាញ់មនោគមជនបរទេសនិងជាតិសាសន៍ផ្សេងបាត់បង់ជំនឿចិត្តលេីជាតិសាសន៍ខ្លួនឯងទេីបធ្វេីអោយបាត់បងគ្រប់យ៉ាងបែបនេះ!
No, hundreds of years before france came in. It was because ancient Khmer internal politics, they killed each other for power.
ខ្មែរយើងបែកបាក់សាមគ្គីខាត់បង់រហូត៎គួសោកស្ដាយចង់បានមកវិញកេរ្ត៍តំនែលខ្មែរយើង
សាមគ្គីគ្នាឡើង!
Not all stone castles in Cambodia are their own. It belonged to the Thai-KHOM people in the past. Cambodia has never had a king. There is no civilization whatsoever. Even the language the Khmers were also influenced by the Thai-KHOM language which is the root of the ancient Thai-KHOM. The Khmers were just slaves of the Thai-KHOM, Thai-Siamese people in the past. There was no knowledge of building ancient castles or temples. At present, the stone castle is in ruins and there is no way to repair or maintain it. also appealed to the Indian government and the Thai government came to help study and repair and maintain it. And how can Khmer people claim to be civilized masters? Even today, Khmers still do not know how to take care of or preserve ancient stone castles and temples.
អគុណថៃដែលមិនបំផ្លាញហើយថែរក្សាបានល្អណាស់❤️
បើឃើញផ្ទាល់ ពិតជាស្រលាញ់
Local Thai people keep all temples well maintained to respect angkorian varaman kings.
Love Khmer ancient temples. ❤️from Thailand 🇹🇭
សូមឱ្យប្រសាទខ្មែរទាំងអស់ហោះមកប្រទេសខ្មែរវិញ🙏🙏🇰🇭
ខ្ញុំយល់អារម្មណ៍មួយនេះណាស់
មើលរឿងប្រឌិតបែបវិទ្យាសាស្ត្រច្រើនពេកអត់ល្អទេអូន។
អ្នកបុរាណវិទ្យាបរទេសបានបង្ហាញភស្តុតាងនោះ។ វត្តភីម៉ៃត្រូវបានកសាងឡើងកាលពី៣០០ឆ្នាំមុនវត្តអង្គរ។ និងសាងសង់ឡើងដោយជនជាតិថៃក្នុងសម័យនោះ។ គឺព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី1 លុះមកដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទសូរ្យវរ្ម័នទី2 ទ្រង់បានធ្វើចំណាកស្រុកមកកសាងអង្គរវត្តនៅពេលក្រោយ ដោយសារគ្រោះរាំងស្ងួត។ នៅពេលដែលប្រាសាទអង្គរត្រូវបានគេសាងសង់ ជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជាត្រូវបានគេប្រើប្រាស់ជាកម្មករ។ ប្រាសាទអង្គរមានរហូតដល់រជ្ជកាលព្រះបាទជ័យវរ្ម័នទី9។
មែនហើយ មានជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចម្នាក់ដែលបះបោរ ជននោះគឺជា ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1។ ព្រោះគាត់ជាទាសករយូរមកហើយ។ នៅពេលគេបណ្តេញជនជាតិថៃដែលបានសាងសង់ប្រាសាទអង្គរវត្ត និងជាវណ្ណៈគ្រប់គ្រងចេញពីទឹកដី។ ដូច្នេះ ព្រះបាទស្រីសុរិយោពណ៌ទី1 បានប្រកាសខ្លួនឯងថាជាស្តេចនៃប្រទេសកម្ពុជា។
នេះហើយជាមូលហេតុដែលវត្តភីម៉ៃត្រូវបានគេកសាងឡើងមុនវត្តអង្គរ។
ហើយមាន ប្រាសាទភ្នំរូង ផងដែរ។ វានៅប្រទេសថៃដែលចាស់ជាងវត្តអង្គរ។
បងប្អូនខ្មែរយើងត្រូវចិញ្ចឹមចិត្តទុកថ្ងៃណាមួយយើងខ្លាំងយើងនឹងយកមកវិញមិនថា50ធ្នាំរឹ100ធ្នាំទៀតនោះទេជនជាតិថៃវាបានបណ្តុះគំនិតជនជាតិវាអោយមានជាតិនិយមទើបប្រទេសវារុងរឿងហើយពង្រីកទឹកដីធំៗទៅឯចំនែកយើងតូចៗទៅគួរអោយសោកស្តាយណាស់ប្រសាទយើងនៅក្នុងទឹកដីវាច្រើនណាស់
Nationalism in Thailand is not strong. We didn’t expect new generation for love our culture. It’s their choice. The World is diversity.
ឥឡូវវាកំពុងតែជួបគ្រោះធម្មជាតិទឹកលិចរាល់ធ្នាំរយះពេល10ធ្នាំហើយតាំងតែពីរឿងប្រសាទព្រះវិហារមកបន្តិចទៀតវារហាមហើយដលពេលដែលវាសងញើសឈាមខ្មែរហើយរោងចក្រនៅប្រទេសថៃខូចខាតសម្បើបណាស់គេលែងចង់រកសីុនៅប្រទេសថៃហើយទឹកលិចរាល់ធ្នាំអោយសមមុខអាស្តេចថៃឈ្លើយណាស់
ភ្នំរូងប្រែជាភាសាថៃថាយ៉ាងណាប្រាប់បានខ្ញុំចង់ដឹង
ប្រាសាទបុរាណខ្មែរនៅពេញទាំងប្រទេសថៃអ្នកយល់ទេខ្មែរនៅថៃនិងរក្សាទុកឲ្យបានគង់វង្សខ្មែរកម្ពុជាកំទូចចិត្ត