Is THIS confusing? What do you think?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- Tonight we're trying to explain about singing in 'waves', or not!
TIME STAMPS -
0:00 Intro
0:45 The Advice
1:10 Breaking it Down
3:38 Singing Flat (or ‘out of tune’)
4:09 Singing ‘Without Waves’(Digital vs. Human)
5:37 Singing into a Tuner vs. Pitch Correction
7:24 Setting Realistic Goals & Interpretations
For more, check out my other sites! / wingsofpegasus www.wingsofpegasusband.com/ / wingsofpegasus Twitter - @wingsofpegasus Insta - @wingsofpegasusofficial - Розваги
So many people giving 'expert' advice. Fil - you'll go mad if you try to correct it all but thanks for the explanation, as usual.
I'm not sure why he is doing. I'm afraid I'm one who's starting to think it's a bit much.
@@Alec_Collins78 He is doing it because he is one of the few of us who actually care about music and keeping it real.
@@Alec_Collins78 he is doing it because people purchase music believing the singers are phenomenal and its a multi-million dollar industry that is faking the music. Its like paying full price for a 2024 Porsche with Yugo parts in it.
Precisley, & thank god Fil is doing this, & will hopefully continue to do so.. A true genuine vocalist does not need all of this digital fake crap, it defeats the purpose of singing, ñ takes away emotion, expressed feelings ñ nuance ~
I'm not sure you can speak English @Alec_Collins78
Lesson number one: If you're serious about learning to sing, find a reputable human voice coach and take lessons from said human.
I've learned things from videos, helped my technique, but that can't replace a teacher who teaches and gives real time , personal feedback
For sure. Listening to instagram or tiktok videos for lessons on how to sing is like using web md to check for what's wrong with your car. It will always be cancer.
Is a reputable human voice coach the "said human"? I don't know why in the last or two I'm seeing "said" this and "said" that all over, much more than before, and not in the context of a legal document. Is this a new trending speech pattern, like "literally" used for everything?
@@fredbloggs6080 "said x" just means "the x I just mentioned." It is an expression I've been aware of and used for the last 50 years. Maybe you are just noticing it now?
@@roadrunnercrazy Sorry, I was looking at the original commenters photo, but I'm still probably older than you. Here's my comment again--there were some dictation typos in it also. I know what it means. I very rarely saw it except for the last couple years, except in legal documents--even on the Internet. It seems that maybe it's used more in certain dual language English speaking countries, like The Philippines, or perhaps others. I would assume you don't say something is literally this or literally that all the time, as has been going on for a few years, I think with Gen Z.
Fil = One of the best singing instructors on You Tube! As I've said before on his other videos, I've learnt more from Fil about how to sing than just about anyone. Love your videos !
Hi Fil! It can be confusing, but you explained it well! Thank you!
I'm not an expert.
But...
The vibration is the most beautiful in a (singing) voice.
I want to hear the vibration, the emotion.
I'm glad I grew up in a time everything was real & sometimes the inperfection made it perfect!
🤘💜
I'm guessing you mean vibrato. Vibrate is what the vocal chords do inorder to create the sound (wave).
Yes, good singers are capable of an extreme amount of vibrato. That’s why they are great singers. They are not applying it to that extreme all the time, though.
@@soundguyHielmi
Yes.
I said I'm not an expert.
Sorry 🫣
@@Sonia-xyz I read your comment which is why I tried to explain things to you. ;)
@@soundguyHielmi
Thanks.
I appreciate it. 💕
Hey, found it interesting Beyonce stated she wanted authentic pure sounds and didn’t even want guitars perfectly in tune on her latest album… I think an analysis of parts of Cowboy Carter to show this, instrumentally and vocally, and explain how her decision contributes to the overall music experience would be fascinating- could this start a trend away from digital correction? Thanks for all you do!
Our vocal cords, our mouth, tongue jaw etc was designed to speak and we can all sing, but some of us not well. Our ears hear our voice and our brain tells us what we hear. That is the gift humans are given. Those same humans are now changing this wonderful gift into a horrible machine that is artificial and ugly. Our voice is a beautiful gift. Some of us do not have a voice, or cannot hear it, they have machines/computers to give them a voice. Only man could think a mechanically altered human voice is a good idea.
Addendum: only greedy people would think altering a lovely human voice would be great.
Exactly! I hope no students are being taught that idea she has. Thank you!
Hi Fil,
This was an interesting video today. Not really sure where she was going with this so called “tip”. I can see where this can get confusing for new or beginning voice students. Thanks for doing this one, great job! Debbie☮️
Any good or great singer sometimes will ask a piano player to play a certain note to they can attune to that note, especially if they were going to do an impromptu performance. This person in the video needs to understand that sound is measured in soundwaves using a tool with a microphone (to turn sound into an electrical signal), some software/hardware (to turn that signal into data) and a screen (to display the data. The two tools to use to accomplish this are an oscilloscope or a phone with a frequency recording app as she was doing in the video.
If a singer today is only concentrating on hitting or being close to the note they want to sing to sing in tune, then that will remove any expression that the voice would normally produce when they sing.
This is funny. Just as I was listening to her hold that note a train passed nearby and blew its horn and it was the same note. But the train note didn't wave...😀 - (but it did change pitch as it moved further away)
LOL
Good clarification of the use of the term, "waves". A tuner app on my phone is handy, as I've been training myself to hear in my head, and then sing an E4 out of the blue. I can usually get pretty close now, but can't ever make my voice stay stuck on the line, because human vocal cords aren't keyboards😊 Thanks, Fil!
Jimi Hendrix when asked if he played music with his teeth
said "I play music with my EARS"
She definitely went off semantically. Music has a language, as we know, and although we can't all be expected to be experts in music theory a vocal coach should stick to accepted terminology. Otherwise you end up with a confusing "lesson," which is exactly what she did here.
Thanks for the break down FIL! It concerns me that these misleading tidbits are floating all over the internet. Videos like this get pushed to people who don’t know any better and then they get confusing info from “vocal coaches” (people that are meant to be a good authority on singing and can communicate the subject well). I’m not saying she was ill-intentioned but some more clarity was needed on this one. Hopefully her other videos make more sense.
EXACTLY
Valuable feedback. Thanks for sharing Phil.
This is fascinating to me and very interesting. I love learning about this, even though there’s no way I could ever be a singer. As I come from a family that is pretty much all tone deaf. People would laugh at us when we would all try to sing happy birthday together. Which we honestly didn’t mind at all because we laughed at ourselves. Probably pitch correction software would start smoking and short circuit if ever applied to my family. 😮
Great job Fil.
Fil, Yes, she was very confusing ! I watched this twice to make sure I was hearing what she was saying correctly . Your explanation was excellent ! You are quite the teacher and make sure that you present every one of your analysis videos in a way that is understandable and educational. Thank you for that.💜
I had to watch it twice, too. She’s very confusing.
I know ! I am glad I wasn't the only one who had to watch it twice !@@SuziQ.
I think it's just semantics. I don't think she meant frequency waves, but a wavy (high variance of pitch) output.
I agree. Now I won’t bother adding a comment.
That's what I thought too.
I kept thinking: What's wrong with vibrato?
Agreed, maybe wavering is the term she wants.
Either way, it was a poor word choice.
Hi,Fil,i like the way you tell it as it is,brilliant.cheers,Roly🇬🇧.
Fil, great video and you explain this well. To give you a warning I am an electrical engineering professor and I only say that as a warning that my explanation here will be boring. A pure tone is a sound wave at one frequency. Your pitch monitoring software plots the pitch frequency on a y axis. A human voice produces sound at a pitch frequency by modulating that pitch around a range of frequencies that show up quasi-periodic waves with amplitude variations on the y axis and a quasi-period on the x-axis. The vocal cords create physical movement in a periodic fashion to create this modulation and that is what makes the human voice unique and beautiful. This instagram is confusing that with wave behavior and as you show by zooming in, even the auto-tuned voice of someone intentionally trying to 'hold it to the line' still has modulated behavior. Pitch correcting software, when it makes the pitch 'bang to the line' de-humanizes the voice and frankly makes it sound weird. Thanks for isolating vocals to show us this. If this pitch correction movement continues we might as well just listen to a melodica as opposed to a human voice.
I felt that she was speaking more about strength of the voice. If your voice isn't at all robust, it can waver wildly and not sound in pitch.
electronic tuners calibrate & divide the pitch into 100 ´cents'
all people and most instruments have some audible vibrato
****ACTUALLY it is not about strength of voice that is at issue----It is about
an auditory function.
To sing without STRAYING from the pitch :
hear your tones in your mind's ear first
then sing. (you dont toss a basketball first, then try to guide it along with your hand)
dont search for the tones with your "throat". Usually It's too late at that point.
the undesireable "wavering" is someone trying to aim & self-correct after they're already producing a tone
this like trying to play darts or hopscotch but you forgot to aim.
You can't use your EYES to sing or use a feedback mechanism (whilst singing) that registers AFTER you have already produced the tone.
I think she might be talking about when you don't have a strong anchor point for your voice you tend to have this longer pitch wave to your voice couse you don't know / feel / hear where the notes are and you drift in and out without control so it helps if you find a way to stay steady. I had a friend who had voice like that and he would go easily 50 cents sharp when singing louder and flat when singing more quiet. It had this uuuuAAAaaaaa... like long wave to it. My advise for him was to try to play the melody on guitar and try to hear the notes and sing with the guitar
If you want to sound like a signal generator, sing bang on the note every time. The wonderful sound of a good human voice singing is due to the flexibility between notes and how they change with the music.
Thank you Fil for the explanation 😊
Great update as always Fil. Happy Easter to you all to.
Thanks Fil for the breakdown of this vocal coach instructional video. I loved how you explained the natural abilities of the human voice with regard to creating sound, especially when you mentioned that the human voice sings in waves. In a way, it was refreshing to hear something that wasn’t pitch corrected. I myself have utilized voice apps to aid in my own voice and singing on key. I’ve noticed the waves happening when I’m singing vibrato and the app will go slightly sharp, slightly flat or “Perfect” and I’m thinking, “Okay I guess I’m getting somewhere.” Claude Stein teaches workshops on “The Natural Singer.” I’ve attended several of them, including a week long retreat workshop. Thanks for doing this, Fil!
Hello Fil. Yes I learned that sound travels in waves when I was in high school 60 years ago.
Another great video. Thanks Fil.
The best way to stabilize pitch is to sing with vibrato. What she sang there is barely off pitch and probably sounds more like a randomized chorus effect in a recording. Let’s remember people are trying to make money off of add revenue on UA-cam.
We ALL sing in waves. I am a voice coach. I know how to give specifics.
You always present good information.
My interpretation is she is using 'waves' to refer to going into and out of pitch. Glad you always remain objective and professional, Fil!
One confusing thing is that the term "tuning" in singing just means singing in tune as accurately as you can, and has nothing to do with modern artificial pitch correction or auto-tune. Vocal coaches who are also opera singers sometimes use the term "tuning", probably because they use other terms like "resonance tuning" and "formant tuning" in opera - but when they say something is "well tuned", they are most likely just saying that the relative pitch of the notes of a passage or run is good. I think this person was just using the word "wavy" to mean all over the place, or unstable.
Thanks for the explanation.
"Sing the song in tune." Genius LOL
Love will tear us apart 😂
@@highlandsprings5752sad to say you've just lost the millienials 😅
lol. Happy Easter, Maestro. Take it easy. ❤
The term she's looking for is "vibrato". And vibrato is just microshifts in pitch that are very much part of Western (and many others) musical performance practice. Telling someone to sing without vibrato, tho...usually, that results in a weird, forced sound that sounds utterly unnatural. Kind of like Autotune, but really annoying since vibrato is a natural feature of the human voice. It's bad enough when a voice gets hard-tuned, but "DIY hard-tuning" just sounds bad.
What's confusing here is that the person who posted this "advice" just says "singing in waves". And this could be just pitch (as shown by the pitchsquigglies), or it could be tremolo, meaning a periodic and cyclical change in volume. On an oscilloscope, that looks like "waves".
But ONE thing I know from years of study and performance in voice (about as close to a synth as academia was willing to tolerate 30-40 years ago) is that I was NEVER told to not "sing in waves".
Perhaps the poster would enlighten us with which particular "waves" she means here... because her argument falls apart because she's using the wrong descriptive/technical term. And we're just as in the dark as you, Fil.
She obviously doesn’t know what she is talking about. I feel sorry for anyone who takes lessons from her.
Waves !
Yeah, she has a different definition of the word "wave" than the rest of us do. Speaking of singing into tuners, have you ever checked out Amanda Harvey? She was a contestant on AGT a few years ago. She had gone profoundly deaf as a teenager, but then taught herself to sing using a tuner and learning the "muscle memory" of how it felt to sing each pitch. The result was very impressive indeed.
Just to clarify things a bit, since there’s some potentially confusing terms and explanations both in the original reel and this video.
It’s true that vocal cords produce sound by vibrating, and sound travels as longitudinal waves through the air (or other medium). However, that is a completely separate issue from if the _pitch_ of a tonal sound has vibrato / waves / fluctuations, or not.
From the viewpoint of physics, the pitch of any sound can be 100% steady and perfect, regardless of its source (human, digital piano, etc). It’s not like we are always going to find some small magical waves if we just zoom close enough in the pitch monitor. Sound _does_ look like waves when we look at it in an oscilloscope, but this is a different tool, and should not be confused with analysing and plotting the pitch of a sound.
All sounds are produced by something vibrating and moving the air and creating sound waves, and if this something vibrates at a steady rate, the pitch of the resulting sound is also going to be 100% steady. With any natural human voice, there will of course always be some imperfections (or “waves” or vibrato etc.) in the pitch, but this is not in any way caused by the fact that vocal cords vibrate to produce sound, or that sound propagates as waves - it’s because humans are humans, and we just can’t vibrate our vocal cords at a 100% steady rate.
Enjoyed.
I think even inexperienced singers can tell she's giving false advertisement by saying "use a piano", is like saying "use sunglasses when driving in the daylight". She could get a job doing local news.
She should had said sing on pitch... a pitch is a wave and why it can be measured in hertz such as A=440hz, that's a wave vibrating 440 times a second.
All the same there are times on near every instrument (obviously can't on a pipe organ) that you may want to slide or alter out of semi-tone pitches and back again (like vibrato) or maybe quarter-tone bends for instance. i.e. every single good blues song does that iow... not a b5 or a #4 but a wavering somewhere in between those.
Take the Locrian mode 1 b2 b3 4 b5 b6 b7 add more sliding and quarter-tone bends into it and you'll be able come up with some really great melodic phrases which sound very middle-eastern.
Only a pure sine wave can be on exactly 1 frequency, or pitch. Of course, that sine-wave frequency can then fluctuate and be at any pitch. I think she was trying to describe overall frequency fluctuations or pitch drift as waves that look like random water waves.
Yes…she was confusing until Fil explained it! 👍👍👍
To answer the question in the title--yes. Though you can only see the waves on pitch monitoring software, it's not clear from the IG reel. It does seem like she's talking about pitch.
I think her advice is fine; it's just expressed a bit ambiguously. I think she could have been clearer about what she meant if she' had not used the word wave in her explanation. As an exercise for aspiring singers, attempting to match the steady pitch of a reference point is probably a good idea.
It's reinventing the wheel - how can we make it sound great if we don't use software?! How about some natural talent and lots of hard work practicing. I mean, not everyone can or should be a singer right - or have we lost that bit of common sense as well?!
One is not actually singing words. We are singing the vowels mostly. So vowels are more like waves, as she misinterprets. The consonants are more like punctuation.
So, here's what I think ... back in the day, 30/40/50 years ago and beyond, voices sounded better because they were naturally good and people knew this because they actually heard music with their ears. Today, people see music with their eyes and feel the need for "voices" to be on the lines. This has led to modern recordings sounding robotic and all the same, with the pervasive use of pitch correction making the voice devoid of any artistic expression or emotional storytelling. Now, if people don't even understand how vocal chords work, fundamentally, then we may have already lost the battle today in support of real voices over fake voices ...
^
So you're saying that video killed the radio star....📺🎶 Sounds like a good idea for an MTV video....😃
@@RSVPini No, I think what I'm saying is that the pervasive use of pitch correction has sucked the life out of modern recordings - new music and re-releases of our favourite music from days gone by ie before the late nineties when pitch correction technology became widely used. But, yes, there should be an MTV video made about this practice and why its use should always be disclosed.
@@elizabethmiller7291 I understand. My earlier comment was a lame attempt at a joke but also to point out that MTV was the first step toward the kind of sanitizing of music, where the raw sound was beginning to be replaced with visual distractions and many consumers of music were being attracted to video images as much or more as the songs themselves. Songs with a good video attached might sell better than a better song with no video. All that is to say, that I agree with you and I think pitch correction is a terrible part of the evolution (devolution) of the music industry.
@@RSVPini I knew that. :) And, that was very well put. Do you know about the petition that Fil started about the disclosure of the use of pitch correction. It's not getting the number of people signing it that I had expected. :(
Interesting details. There are three strings for one note in the acoustic piano...lol
Curious to know how artists in the field address these matters live on stage to date. Pfff
Happy Easter y'all, bless you. Rock !
I can achieve Leonard Cohen ranges, but not Tom Petty or Van Morisson, both of whom I love.
I think she’s just chosen some really confusing language to describe what she means. When she says “waves”, I don’t think she means sound waves. She means (I presume) excessive fluctuation of pitch.
Ah normal service had resumed. 😃 It sounds like this is a very early lesson.
If you just make a noise with you're voice its a sound wave. BUT I think she might mean the waves are drifting over a large range. BUT we have seen vibrato over range over 3 full notes. 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Poor lady has us all confused and I am have been a musician for 50 years.
Great video 2x👍
My impression is that the person was absent from school when the lesson was about the nature of sounds.
Trchnically, a digital piano does create waves, as its speaker cone is vibrating. To support Fil's point that, sound is frequency waves, in the air striking our ear drums, and transfering those vibrations to the bones in our ears.
Sound waves
Fil, I like hearing waves, lol. Oh, she doesn't mean vibrato!👍💙💙💙🥰✌
Lol the thumb nail "what do you think?" looks like "you where being careless with your whisper" or another chocolate covered snack
Ken Tamplin is one of some vocal coaches who not only teach, but he also sings.
I'm probablly wrong, (not the first time this hour), but something in my ear or my head is telling me that she is referring to uncontrolled vibrato. when she refers to vibrating vocals. Otherwise, what she is saying is kind of hard to figure out
I think she must have meant not _wavering,_ i.e., sticking close to the desired pitch? That's what her tip was trying to address, anyway.
It is the natural variations in the sound wave of the human voice that gives it's individuality and beauty.
Maybe there's a danger that if younger people become so used to the sound of pitch corrected and/or autotuned vocals that they will think the goal is to emulate that sound naturally, that the artificially altered sound is superior.
This is interesting, because there are some singers who are/were notable for not using vibrato EG the late Kirsty MacColl. But there must have been SOME vibrato, just not a very obvious vibrato.
“Singing in waves” is not just a physiological, but a physical imperative. All sounds are waves.
So interesting,..
Would love for you to do an analysis on Kaleo. They just had a live release of their newest song "Lonely Cowboy". Thanks!!
I had to watch this twice.
I don’t think she understands the right words to use. She’s very confusing.
Does she mean “scales” when she says “waves”? Scales are for vocal practice without words.
I still don’t know what she means by “waves” (because “sound waves” are how sound travels).
Not confusing I just don't understand but singing in the shower with the water running helps cover up misteaks and even sounds halfway decent. 🌊
What she really meant to say or should have said, is if your pitch wanders up or down from the correct pitch... That reminds me of a joke someone made a long time ago. He told a guy his hair was starting to wave -- It is? -- Yes, it is starting to wave goodbye.
I suspect she meant waves as in 'wild' variations or flutters in pitch and/or volume, not the actual sound waves themselves. Either that or she is a T-1000 from the future and John Connor should start running for cover! 😁
Fil, I know being the gentleman you are, you don't like to name names and criticize, but! Could you please find a way to address how on the old American Idol show one of the judges CONSTANTLY misused the term "pitch?" "You're a little pitchy..." "She's too pitchy..." "That was a bit pitchy..." Saying someone is "pitchy" means NOTHING! That's like saying "You're a little soundy."
I think this is a case of "I sang a song once, so that qualifies me to give advice on singing." I'mean the OP not you Fil.
This has a lot to do with the lead guitarist following the singer, but as I keep telling people the singer is the in continuity ( like the B string on their guitar) of a band.
Yes I understand that the lead guitarist has a hard time but if you want it to sound good then your going to have to keep up and understand that the lead guitarist can also express themselves in the same way ( where we get guitar solos from ).
She doesn't mean the waves of a vibrato, she means the 'bigger' waves of loosing the pitch on aa long note.
The F in Fil stands for FFT.
Also, that girl is lucky StarWars hasnt copyright struck her yet for the wookie noise.
Vocal coach here is misleading and quite pointless except to say, try and sing in tune.
concert pitch is normally A = 440 hertz, which surely is a frequency and other notes are different frequencies which is the time between waveforms or am i totally wrong?
When she said "singing in waves" I felt like throwing a fit. The vocal chords stretch and the vibrations cause the pitch and ability to vocalize. Vibration will cause the variation or "waves." It's just how the body works and it would be impossible to sing without waves since your chords HAVE to vibrate to generate sound and pitch. Even false chords are vibrating.
Fil , I'm terribly tired . But I am on your side . Shall we say . I am a singer . Vocal chords. ?? I think the best so gets just bust this .
WOW, play a piano note as a referee. Who knew???
I see a lot of the problem(s) as people being in too much of a hurry, especially to become famous.
Before the internet, the only "overnight" successes were people who had worked at their crafts for 10 or 20 years.
Now, a TikTok/Instagram/UA-cam "creator" can lip sync to a famous song, get 1,000 likes, and presto! They are a "star" 🎉. Not.
To her, "singing in waves" means your voice WAVERS and can't stay on the same pitch. My mother always complained that the reason today's singers do so many "runs" is because they don't have the skill to hold a steady note.
Hello sir, I am curious to know if you have heard the brother/sister band Lawrence? Sort of Tower of Power has a child with Hall & Oates and Stevie Wonder, (sort of). Check out the 'Acoustic'ish' version of Don't lose sight, if you get a chance. Seems like killer 'real' live lead vocals (Gracie) with lovely 'real live' harmony and background vocals. I hope I spelled most of the words properly. Their first proper Album (I'm Old) is called Breakfast from 2017, I think. It has the full complement of horns, keys etc. as do the live shows. The Henley tape/voice video was enlightening, thank you sir. I only listen to the Eagles because of Joe, I hope he is really playing, I don't see him faking it, so to speak, even at his age. Pun intended.
Fil, did you report the impersonator? I did, but I think it’s more effective when you report them and block them.
Why would someone want to try and sing on a "line" means nothing to me. If you cant deliver emotion through a song then ya just another singer...Have a listen to this and me tell why is it so important to "sing on a line" paste into your search Putri Ariani - Al I'tiraf cover LIVE 2024 (closing event performance) Eng Sub
All sound is a perturbation of the medium (air) produced by vocal chords. Without the perturbation, there's no sound.
Indeed, specifically sound is a pressure wave that travels through the medium. It can be caused by any vibrating object be that vocal cords, the string of a guitar, the cone of a loudspeaker or your next-door neighbour's lawn mower.
Merry Clayton please. ^^
Decent analysis. You don't sing in "waves". A sound is a waveform - square, sine, sawtooth - and has amplitude (determining how loud it is) and wavelength (determining the frequency or pitch). The examples in the reel show a frequency modulation akin to vibrato, nothing to do with waves😊
Interestingly an upright or grand piano make sound by vibrating a string creating a wave?
It creates a complex waveform, not the same thing as the vocal coach is talking about.
She was annoying lol. Thanks for the analysis & info Fil😊🌆🌜⭐️🎼
How processed is Bouncy.
Isn’t it the case that “sounds” don’t technically exist? It’s just an interpretation by eardrums to our brains of waves created through an atmosphere? If that’s right then the old saying about a tree in the forest falling doesn’t really make a sound unless someone is there to hear it. Or something with ears, I suppose.
Vibrato?
This was confusing, and I really wonder about the qualifications of some of these "vocal coaches". Maybe she was talking about trying to keep your voice from wavering, although obviously she was also talking about singing on pitch as well. Bad choice of words at any rate.
She's confusing a pitch trace with a sound wave. The trace is just showing the current pitch (which is made of waves).
Voices are not tuned to a piece of equipment i dunno
No energy, charge, photons, waves, spin, fields, potential, quantum,quarks, space, time, space- time etc. All Standard Theory/Model was replaced by Expansion Theory in 2002. Just a physics update for those interested- very few. “The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well..... everything. Off topic? Not really; much to be learned. Otherwise carry on!
😂😂😂
❄️🇨🇦❄️❤️
Its funny how she actually thinks she knows enough to try to post a video on singing.
@DS
Exactly my thoughts.
Did you know that you could use a piano note as a reference🤣
@@theonemodifierthat advice has changed my life 😆