Favoloso!!! Grazie mille. Ho scoperto per prima la lezione su Qoelet ed è stata illuminante!!!! Ho capito, finalmente. Prima non capivo, era un testo oscuro, incomprensibile, se pur affascinante. E ora mi ascolto tutte le sue lezioni. Un enorme GRAZIE da una peccatrice tornata all'ovile....e che ha tanto bisogno di leggere e capire
Non ci sono parole per esprimere la mia ammirazione per il Prof. Mazzinghi. Una preparazione e un livello di conoscenza di rara portata. Grazie a chi ha chi condiviso questo seminario. Massima stima per il Professore per la sua posizione imparziale, per come passa dall' ebraico al latino al greco. Altro che nobel qua ci starebbe un monumento! Ah no sarebbe da idolatri 😂😁.
Dio è in tutto perché come conclude ultimo salmo tutto ciò che vive sulla terra dia lode a Dio da ci fa capire che senza di lui l'uomo non può vivere perciò bisogna darle gloria ied esaltato ciò che merita DIO è vita grazie fratello.
I will point to the difference between Jesus and everything else, according to what I understand. Before that I will add two comments, different, but in connected points that have become one, with now (this comment) a third one, becoming together with the other two, as a one comment. And it is this. I have a suggestion I will add, after adding a comment I wrote on a different but very connected point. (All that begins with ((trauma)) as it's known and declared point, will have a ((certain)) end, and by having began as a trauma, it's end will also be of such, ((in many cases amplified immensely, by the default of being the very end)). This is a title I have used for something I have written recently, and as a paragaphical explanation at the end of it, I wrote this also....! Because it is based on the principle of a line between two points, and any point with and within what is eternal is always by the default of its start a trauma, which cannot be in existence with and within what is eternal, hence it has to end, and it's end will always be more likely as it's beginning, if not... more amplified. And after I have finished this comment, I will take it and use it on another point, related to the problem of the existence of ((bad)) and of the ((devil)). The referred unwritten laws (on the literary writings) by the character of Antigone, are I believe, not fully explained as of their existence. First and foremost the laws are known as (unwritten) because of the simple fact of (writing) not being of much use for anyone or anything in relation to day to day existence, and the (written) laws when written, it happened so only when (writing) was considered as a use for day to day existence, plus once (written) almost all of the laws reflected point for point with the origins, that of the (unwritten) laws. It means that both (unwritten) and (written) laws matched almost always in relation to begin with and within anyone. Until control (levels of power) saw a beneficiary outcome in not having it so. Which meant that quite often, according to necessity, reason and logic either set of laws (unwritten and written) did not match, in fact went in opposition against each form. What the literary case of Antigone, put's a finger on (per say), is this....! Once faced with a reality or possibilities of a reality, then the (written laws) have no reason or logic not to have a match with (unwritten laws) and vice versa. If not......! Something very bad, dark and much later known as the (devil) is at play often with as much peaceful manifestation as a very sound reason and logic. All because of the line principal, that of (a line) from a point to another, and that of (a line) from a point and continuing. This form of being, although it is not attributed to the (unwritten laws), but instead to (written ones) and later to be known as (mathematics), is in fact the core of what is always (unwritten) later to be known as divine. The difference between (a start and an end, and a start and continuing) is immense, making for one being known as (divine) and the other as the (devil). This is the comment I wrote on a different but connected point. Now taking the comment on it's entirety.... a question should be asked. Is there, in all that is, systems that exist in being so without functions such as the ones we human in being and other biological beings have!?!? Meaning, grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc simultaneously without being an intrinsic part of the very system doing so. And if so.....! What does it take, for what is being grabbed, moved, pushed, held, braked, split, thrown, crushed etc etc to be an exact part of the system that is doing so.....!?! The answer to that, gives anyone an idea of what is considered as (bad) and the (devil) is. That of a line that started as a consequence of a grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc, and instead of aiming to become an intrinsic part of the start, it continues in using exactly the same actions that started it, to go on, with the aim of eternity. Making what is known as (bad) and the (devil) very much evident. Taking the whole writing in consideration then the difference between Jesus and everything else is more clearer to think about at minimum and it totals to this. After having pointed to knowledge existing in relation to the end all, Jesus emphasises that (no one, nothing, angels, including him, knows when, how, and what is the end of all). Pointing that anyone aware of this, should be and live in a way that keeps anyone ready. Meaning that anyone should always look, recognise and use the (unwritten laws) in matching with the (written laws) referred to in the literary writings by the character of Antigone. Meaning that the difference between the two is....! That a line that has a start as a consequence of a grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc should become an intrinsic part of the system that initiated it in the most unforced way, as quickly as possible, not making it continue instead through the very actions that started it. Just as light does, wind, rain, leaves, seeds, a human body, a biological form, any form on the universe etc etc, which are all lines that have a start with what is known as (God), what is eternal, what is everything, having no need to (continue) as a specific line. Making for an end to all, of a most certainty in being. Because almost everything in all that is, exists through no actions such as grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc except here as far as we know. And whatever line has a start on such a method will end, becoming an intricate part of its start, with the aim in realisation of all that is, if not made to grabb, move, push, hold, brake, split, throw, crush in order to start or be a line of any type then it should not be, just because it can. In thinking about this, anyone can think over also, of why and what Jesus means when saying that the (known as the beatitudes verses) will inherit the kingdom of heaven and earth. Because their lines will have almost no opposition to that of which is all, becoming an intrinsic part of what is known as (God) eternity, in the quickest unforced way at their end, at the end of all. Which means eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and earth, just as Jesus says it is.
Bravissimo questo professore, colto e preparato. E' un piacere ascoltarlo.
Favoloso!!! Grazie mille. Ho scoperto per prima la lezione su Qoelet ed è stata illuminante!!!! Ho capito, finalmente. Prima non capivo, era un testo oscuro, incomprensibile, se pur affascinante. E ora mi ascolto tutte le sue lezioni. Un enorme GRAZIE da una peccatrice tornata all'ovile....e che ha tanto bisogno di leggere e capire
Il Siracide è uno dei miei libri biblici preferiti, grazie per questa meravigliosa meditazione
Non ci sono parole per esprimere la mia ammirazione per il Prof. Mazzinghi. Una preparazione e un livello di conoscenza di rara portata. Grazie a chi ha chi condiviso questo seminario. Massima stima per il Professore per la sua posizione imparziale, per come passa dall' ebraico al latino al greco. Altro che nobel qua ci starebbe un monumento! Ah no sarebbe da idolatri 😂😁.
Dio è in tutto perché come conclude ultimo salmo tutto ciò che vive sulla terra dia lode a Dio da ci fa capire che senza di lui l'uomo non può vivere perciò bisogna darle gloria ied esaltato ciò che merita DIO è vita grazie fratello.
Molto bravo, competente e conoscitore della Bibbia.
Grazie di cuore Padre 🙏
Io sono innamorato di questo libro Siracide e Quoelet
muito bom. Obrigada meu professor Mazzinghi! Saudades dos anos 92-96 a Firenze!
Avvincente.
Ottimo
Si preferiscono le dichiarazioni della Madonna ma chi lo assicura?
Non è un libro che è nella Bibbia, non l'ho conoscevo....
Ma cosa dice? Ma come non è nella Bibbia?
I will point to the difference between Jesus and everything else, according to what I understand. Before that I will add two comments, different, but in connected points that have become one, with now (this comment) a third one, becoming together with the other two, as a one comment.
And it is this.
I have a suggestion I will add, after adding a comment I wrote on a different but very connected point.
(All that begins with ((trauma)) as it's known and declared point, will have a ((certain)) end, and by having began as a trauma, it's end will also be of such, ((in many cases amplified immensely, by the default of being the very end)).
This is a title I have used for something I have written recently, and as a paragaphical explanation at the end of it, I wrote this also....!
Because it is based on the principle of a line between two points, and any point with and within what is eternal is always by the default of its start a trauma, which cannot be in existence with and within what is eternal, hence it has to end, and it's end will always be more likely as it's beginning, if not... more amplified.
And after I have finished this comment, I will take it and use it on another point, related to the problem of the existence of ((bad)) and of the ((devil)).
The referred unwritten laws (on the literary writings) by the character of Antigone, are I believe, not fully explained as of their existence. First and foremost the laws are known as (unwritten) because of the simple fact of (writing) not being of much use for anyone or anything in relation to day to day existence, and the (written) laws when written, it happened so only when (writing) was considered as a use for day to day existence, plus once (written) almost all of the laws reflected point for point with the origins, that of the (unwritten) laws.
It means that both (unwritten) and (written) laws matched almost always in relation to begin with and within anyone. Until control (levels of power) saw a beneficiary outcome in not having it so. Which meant that quite often, according to necessity, reason and logic either set of laws (unwritten and written) did not match, in fact went in opposition against each form.
What the literary case of Antigone, put's a finger on (per say), is this....! Once faced with a reality or possibilities of a reality, then the (written laws) have no reason or logic not to have a match with (unwritten laws) and vice versa.
If not......! Something very bad, dark and much later known as the (devil) is at play often with as much peaceful manifestation as a very sound reason and logic. All because of the line principal, that of (a line) from a point to another, and that of (a line) from a point and continuing. This form of being, although it is not attributed to the (unwritten laws), but instead to (written ones) and later to be known as (mathematics), is in fact the core of what is always (unwritten) later to be known as divine.
The difference between (a start and an end, and a start and continuing) is immense, making for one being known as (divine) and the other as the (devil).
This is the comment I wrote on a different but connected point. Now taking the comment on it's entirety.... a question should be asked.
Is there, in all that is, systems that exist in being so without functions such as the ones we human in being and other biological beings have!?!? Meaning, grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc simultaneously without being an intrinsic part of the very system doing so.
And if so.....! What does it take, for what is being grabbed, moved, pushed, held, braked, split, thrown, crushed etc etc to be an exact part of the system that is doing so.....!?!
The answer to that, gives anyone an idea of what is considered as (bad) and the (devil) is. That of a line that started as a consequence of a grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc, and instead of aiming to become an intrinsic part of the start, it continues in using exactly the same actions that started it, to go on, with the aim of eternity.
Making what is known as (bad) and the (devil) very much evident.
Taking the whole writing in consideration then the difference between Jesus and everything else is more clearer to think about at minimum and it totals to this.
After having pointed to knowledge existing in relation to the end all, Jesus emphasises that (no one, nothing, angels, including him, knows when, how, and what is the end of all). Pointing that anyone aware of this, should be and live in a way that keeps anyone ready.
Meaning that anyone should always look, recognise and use the (unwritten laws) in matching with the (written laws) referred to in the literary writings by the character of Antigone. Meaning that the difference between the two is....! That a line that has a start as a consequence of a grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc should become an intrinsic part of the system that initiated it in the most unforced way, as quickly as possible, not making it continue instead through the very actions that started it.
Just as light does, wind, rain, leaves, seeds, a human body, a biological form, any form on the universe etc etc, which are all lines that have a start with what is known as (God), what is eternal, what is everything, having no need to (continue) as a specific line.
Making for an end to all, of a most certainty in being. Because almost everything in all that is, exists through no actions such as grabbing, moving, pushing, holding, braking, splitting, throwing, crushing etc except here as far as we know.
And whatever line has a start on such a method will end, becoming an intricate part of its start, with the aim in realisation of all that is, if not made to grabb, move, push, hold, brake, split, throw, crush in order to start or be a line of any type then it should not be, just because it can.
In thinking about this, anyone can think over also, of why and what Jesus means when saying that the (known as the beatitudes verses) will inherit the kingdom of heaven and earth. Because their lines will have almost no opposition to that of which is all, becoming an intrinsic part of what is known as (God) eternity, in the quickest unforced way at their end, at the end of all.
Which means eternal life in the kingdom of heaven and earth, just as Jesus says it is.
Prof colto ma sui perché del male ha detto poco... Tanto fumo e un poco di arrosto!
Ti sei perso la seconda parte
No