Simple solutions don't necessarily get anyone closer to the truth. You make a solid case for why it is easier to cause chaos than order, which I can get behind. As for entropy: Order and chaos aren't moral concepts, they're neutral states of being - what's the supposed relationship between the two? There is more chaos than order because systems physically deteriorate over time, but can the same be said about human interaction? Are we all doomed because we're deteriorating on the subatomic level? "In reality, things are really simple - said the human brain in an attempt to understand the world." The reality is, that we're not equipped with the mental faculties to understand objective reality. We evolved to survive, not to make sense of the world. So can anything really be known? Debatable, but I would propose that things, in reality, are rarely as simple as they seem. What the hell is good, and what is bad? And how could you be sure that bad really outweighs the good in the world? Have you measured it, have you considered the cognitive biases that make us more perceptive to harm-avoidance than the perception of good? - Fellow overcomplicator.
For a long time I was told that good and bad things happening to myself must be approximating to 50/50, so I wondered why it doesn't match that way in reality... Until I realised that it was never supposed to be that way to begin with. Moreover, good things never happen by themselves, it's pretty much always you, who makes them happen. Unlike bad things, which may quite often occur accidentally. And yeah, 20m to 2h essays on topics that can discussed and simplified to few sentences are outrageous.
![LAVROV's interview with Tucker CARLSON 😁 [Parody]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mbMemqc-QEk/mqdefault.jpg)
It is written: narrow is the way that leads to life, wide is the way that leads to destruction
Simple solutions don't necessarily get anyone closer to the truth. You make a solid case for why it is easier to cause chaos than order, which I can get behind. As for entropy: Order and chaos aren't moral concepts, they're neutral states of being - what's the supposed relationship between the two? There is more chaos than order because systems physically deteriorate over time, but can the same be said about human interaction? Are we all doomed because we're deteriorating on the subatomic level? "In reality, things are really simple - said the human brain in an attempt to understand the world." The reality is, that we're not equipped with the mental faculties to understand objective reality. We evolved to survive, not to make sense of the world. So can anything really be known? Debatable, but I would propose that things, in reality, are rarely as simple as they seem. What the hell is good, and what is bad? And how could you be sure that bad really outweighs the good in the world? Have you measured it, have you considered the cognitive biases that make us more perceptive to harm-avoidance than the perception of good?
- Fellow overcomplicator.
Shopeandhouser say: more bad than good.
Schopenhauser sad.😢
Alber Cumyou say: whatever.
One must imagine Cumass happy.😁
Your choose🤨
For a long time I was told that good and bad things happening to myself must be approximating to 50/50, so I wondered why it doesn't match that way in reality... Until I realised that it was never supposed to be that way to begin with. Moreover, good things never happen by themselves, it's pretty much always you, who makes them happen. Unlike bad things, which may quite often occur accidentally.
And yeah, 20m to 2h essays on topics that can discussed and simplified to few sentences are outrageous.
Read Karamazov brothers
I disagree