Justice Roberts said "Bring out your dead, Bring out your dead! " The ATF says "Its not quite dead yet" Justice Roberts says " BONK! It is now" Its been a GREAT WEEK! Maybe next week we have Jim Jordon starting the grill to cook UA-cam's censorship! Ill supply the BBQ sauce....
It will more than likely benefit big corporations more than it will the regular joe or mom and pops. That why they need to reconsider the personhood of corporations.
I have to read the rulings but it seems Great! I've been fighting ATF & DEA over our Individual Rights, which looks like Chevron Deference is DEAD! Curt, great seeing ya on G&G (the "debate")!
The Chevron Deference refers to a decision where it was deemed that the agencies of the Executive branch were to be given power to interpret ambiguous statutes included in rulings of the Judicial branch within reason. This allowed agencies such as the FDA to use experts in relevant fields like biology to prevent companies from using know harmful materials in their products. The original case was Chevron U.S.A., Inc. vs Natural Resources Defense Council and was decided in 1984. Essentially, the courts deemed it would be impossible for judges to litigate every detail of a policy, and left it up to agencies who had better experience in regulating their respective fields. This new decision will allow any company to challenge any policy set forth by government agencies and will require federal judges to hear much more cases then they do now.
I don’t think this is great. Now we will have judges with little to no background on the topic making decisions that affect our water, air, food, and more. Judges should interpret law not make law. This is what they will be doing and we will have lots of different interpretations from a multitude of judges. Chaos will arise. The Supreme Court can only decide so many cases a year. Therefore, we are going to have one ruling in one Appeals district and another in a different appeals court. Let’s tear our country into even more pieces.
I agree wholeheartedly. These fools are listening to their capitalist masters who want to sell "freedom" when all they sell is more destruction of our rapidly depleted planet.
@@gabeswitala2292a lot of horrific things were done in the past ecologically and we didn't have half the population we do now. Greed is on the rise as population rises and we have more folks going after the basic laws like "gee maybe don't dump here" and trying to find a way around said laws...hence why we need smarter regulation to stop these smarter greedy entitled people.
@fuxan The EPA, or other agency isn't being abolished. Congress will consider 3rd party testimony. Congress will write the law, which will probably continue to be written by the agency - if the law passes. The lobbyists will influence the House reps. The 435 House members must vote, some for, some against. It sounds liked added workload to the committee. It should be like before 1983.
@@timothykeith1367 This will hamper protections. We already see how our judicial system works. Going backwards is not going to make protections better.
Thank you for getting this out there even if you don’t have a full video ready yet. The courts made a step in the right direction, that’s enough to make my day.
That hat looks like Joe Biden’s face before the 15 face lifts and 27 Botox treatments lmao 🤣 Just joking man I know how it goes when you love a hat you love you just can’t pitch it.
Justice Roberts said "Bring out your dead, Bring out your dead! " The ATF says "Its not quite dead yet" Justice Roberts says " BONK! It is now" Its been a GREAT WEEK! Maybe next week we have Jim Jordon starting the grill to cook UA-cam's censorship! Ill supply the BBQ sauce....
Everyone who has been imprisoned over this should get a lawyer and sue the hell out of the DOJ.
It will more than likely benefit big corporations more than it will the regular joe or mom and pops. That why they need to reconsider the personhood of corporations.
I have to read the rulings but it seems Great! I've been fighting ATF & DEA over our Individual Rights, which looks like Chevron Deference is DEAD! Curt, great seeing ya on G&G (the "debate")!
And trump won’t be able to remove immigrants. And the va won’t be able to decide disability.
Interesting hat choice 🧐
Free my man CRS.
EXACTLY!!!!
💯
I think this is good news with regard to the ATF, but for the CDC? FAA? FCC? maybe NOT. 🤔
It gets worse. This opens the door for a lot of abuse and corruption by the Judiciary
@@jamesricker3997 I guess we'll see how it works out. I kinda see the issue from multiple points of view, but I have concerns.
and OSHA
And epa
Since Roberts wrote the opinion I am sure he liberally spread a whole lot of L special sauce on this so-callee win-sandwich.
This is big time. Free the 2A and free the diesels!
But bye e logs
The 1st thing I thought about was the epa mountains of rules, not laws.
This can be used to right a lot of wrongs since 1985.
Wtf is chevron deference anyway ? A company??
The Chevron Deference refers to a decision where it was deemed that the agencies of the Executive branch were to be given power to interpret ambiguous statutes included in rulings of the Judicial branch within reason. This allowed agencies such as the FDA to use experts in relevant fields like biology to prevent companies from using know harmful materials in their products. The original case was Chevron U.S.A., Inc. vs Natural Resources Defense Council and was decided in 1984. Essentially, the courts deemed it would be impossible for judges to litigate every detail of a policy, and left it up to agencies who had better experience in regulating their respective fields. This new decision will allow any company to challenge any policy set forth by government agencies and will require federal judges to hear much more cases then they do now.
Looks like the pistol brace rule just got weaker.
I don’t think this is great. Now we will have judges with little to no background on the topic making decisions that affect our water, air, food, and more. Judges should interpret law not make law. This is what they will be doing and we will have lots of different interpretations from a multitude of judges. Chaos will arise. The Supreme Court can only decide so many cases a year. Therefore, we are going to have one ruling in one Appeals district and another in a different appeals court. Let’s tear our country into even more pieces.
😂😂😂😂
How did America ever survive for 200 years without it?
I agree wholeheartedly. These fools are listening to their capitalist masters who want to sell "freedom" when all they sell is more destruction of our rapidly depleted planet.
@@gabeswitala2292a lot of horrific things were done in the past ecologically and we didn't have half the population we do now.
Greed is on the rise as population rises and we have more folks going after the basic laws like "gee maybe don't dump here" and trying to find a way around said laws...hence why we need smarter regulation to stop these smarter greedy entitled people.
@fuxan The EPA, or other agency isn't being abolished. Congress will consider 3rd party testimony. Congress will write the law, which will probably continue to be written by the agency - if the law passes. The lobbyists will influence the House reps. The 435 House members must vote, some for, some against. It sounds liked added workload to the committee. It should be like before 1983.
@@timothykeith1367 This will hamper protections. We already see how our judicial system works. Going backwards is not going to make protections better.
Another pp slap for the AFT!❤
What an awesome brithday present!
Happy Birthday, man! 🎉🎉
Good bye e log hello paper
the hell is up with that hat lol.
This is awesome!
I don’t see how the va can decide disability anymore
Thank you for getting this out there even if you don’t have a full video ready yet. The courts made a step in the right direction, that’s enough to make my day.
Show me them Super Safeties!
Ok now red flag “laws”
So CRS should be let out!!!
done deal😊
Thanks Bro.
Wonder how much they paid the judge
FJB FJB FJB
That hat looks like Joe Biden’s face before the 15 face lifts and 27 Botox treatments lmao 🤣
Just joking man I know how it goes when you love a hat you love you just can’t pitch it.
This is such great news, now if something must be regulated, it must be debated in the House and Senate.
That's chaotic and inefficient. Yall regret this.
@fuxan A republic is inefficient so as to prevent consolidated powers. The federal government is not intended to be a well-oiled machine