In regards to image quality, especially sharpness and resolving power, I feel as confident shooting at 1.2 on the WR as I did at f4 with the old version.
I'm using this lens on my XT5 and I love it. The best lens I've bought so far by miles. I also have the 33mm f1.4 and the 18mm f1.4. which are both great lenses. But the 56mm f1.2 has a certain kind of magic about it.
11:08 Fujifilm has incorporated 8 elements with the lens focus group that move when focusing. Thus they have managed to minimise aberration fluctuation from infinity to MOD, by moving the aperture together with the lens focus group. To move the focus group, a DC motor is used for autofocus. They have incorporated three bearing mechanisms with the DC motor for smoother autofocus performance. The bearing mechanics ensure highly accurate control of the DC motor. It's a technical masterpiece. -Fujifilm
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography I love to hear this-it will primarily be my first decent portrait lens for my X-T3, but will transition nicely to a walk around as well as when I add an X-H2s to my kit. Thanks!
I just got this lens and it’s incredible. I’m a headshot and portrait shooter and the 56 is my go to lens on my XT3. This new 56 is an amazing upgrade to an already great lens. I just ordered an XT5 and I can’t wait to try it on that camera. Fujis new lenses are really good. I also got the 33mm which is really really nice also.
Donovan, can you talk about the 33mm. I am a portrait photographer. I photograph families (small-2 members and large-up 25 members), kids, headshots, bridal portraits, etc. My go to lens for families is the 35 1.4. How does the 33 1.4 compare?
@@anthonytriana4209 the 35mm 1.4 is a FANTASTIC lens. Probably one of the coolest lenses Fuji ever made. I loved it. Optically it’s amazing, and the images that lens resolves are unmatched. But the 33 comes VERY close in terms of “magic” with slightly better bokeh due to more aperture blades. And the focus speed and accuracy is FAR faster than the 35. It’s also noticeably sharper and focuses much closer, and it’s silent to focus. No hunting. BAM, nails focus. For faster moving subjects like kids I’d go with the 33. I have shot fast moving subjects with the 35 but the keepers on the 33 are way more. Hope that helps! Oh, and it’s slightly closer at 33 to an actual “50” FOV, vs the 35 which is more Ike a 53mm. Not a big difference but ever so slightly wider than the 35, which I love. Also, it’s weather sealed.
@@babyboy1971 Thank you for your prompt response. I’ve been really enthused about the X-H2 and the X-T5, but I might hold off and get the 33 and new 56 instead and just keep my X-T4.
@Luca Petralia Photography Great to hear. I know maybe it's too much to ask for. But I guess it could be interesting to see how those two compare to each other given the price difference and the fact that the Sigma is said to be a pretty good performer as well.
I'm curious as well, don't get me wrong, but I can't afford to buy new every new lens that comes out. I'm investing already a lot in this channel. However, if and when I'll have the opportunity, I will do my best to compare them
Great video 👌 how does the image quality compare to the gf110mm ? I have the gf110 and gf80mm lenses and I’m thinking is there a must to have this lens too?
The 110 is one of the fest G mount lenses - not comparable. But if you would look at the results in a small screen I doubt that non-photographers would note the difference - maybe in certain situations slightly side by side side as contrast may be higher with the 110 and the DoF is slightly less (1.6 vs 1.8 ish on full frame) but really the 80 will look more different due to angle of view, DoF depending on distance and will also have more color fringing to correct 😂
Whether I pick up the 50 f1 or 56mm f1.2 will come down to Af Performance…speed, accuracy, and actual hit rate. Not sure I would want to deal with the CA of the 50mm but it would be worth it if it hit focus consistently! Does your gut think lens is better than the other in that respect? I’m only interested in stills.
Based on the reviews I've seen on the 50mm, I'd say the 56 focuses faster. However those tests were done with the X-t4, while mine are done with the xh2/xh2s. This can make a big difference. In general, having the wider aperture and moving more glass, the I'd be surprised if the 50mm did better than the 56
@@shy-guy5544 credible reviewers don't claim it. You won't see Frost, Laing, etc use the term. By definition a camera with good contrast has good 'microcontrast' however you wish to define it, and vice versa. You don't see lens manufacturers claim it for the same reason. There is no generally accepted definition of the term because it's not real.
@@ReflexVE plenty of people talk about microcontrast, if you look it up there’s articles explaining what it is exactly. I think Liang actually mentioned it specifically for this lens being improved
I haven't tried the 90mm on the new cameras yet, but if I have to guess, and based on my experience, I'd say 90mm can probably beat the new 56 in speed performance. But again, I haven't performed a specific test yet
56 mm WR is absolutely amazing ,compare to third party lenses (used to own Vitlrox 56 mm 1.4 ) The colour rendering and bokeh on this lens is breathtaking . Thanks Luka for detailed review
Come si comporta l'autofocus è preciso e soprattutto fa rumore come l'obiettivo serie mk1 ? Con il vecchio obiettivo avevo 6 foto su 10 a fuoco le altre spesso non ero fuori fuoco impossibile usare la lente in afc
Hi Luca! I have just received the new XF56mm F1.2 R WR and it seems to me that it has an issue: I use it on X-E4 and it is very noisy and focus hunting constantly regardless of settings. When I press play to review photos it also makes a weird noise (as the focus inside moves) - is it the same with your copy? I have previously used XF56mm F1.2 R and I don't remember it having this focus noise. Could you advise me whether this is normal and what is your experience with the new lens? Is it possible I have a bad copy? Thanks in advance!
I had an issue where the aperture ring wasn't working properly and the weather sealing rubber didn't seal the mount correctly. I think they may have done quality control issues with this lens.
@@KOJIWITHAFUJI Was this issue with the new XF56mm F1.2 R WR? If yes - can you let me know your experience with the noise - do you hear it constantly moving inside?
I don't think you have a bad copy. When pressing play to review pictures mine moves as well. For the continuous hunting check if you accidentally activated the pre-af feature. In this case is always looking for focus and it keeps moving. Le lens is not noisy in my opinion. Non perfectly silent, but I wouldn't say noisy
GFX vives, similar wow factors... that is the sentence i've been waiting for someone to write. Fujifilm has been for years trying to squeeze some of the GFX 3d pop into the x system, and looks like the tonal resolution of the new sensor/processor and lenses is getting there.
I'd say this camera/lens combination is as close as it gets for this. Of course there is still a difference, it would be silly to think there's no gap, but this combination is insanely good
Many thx for the presentation of your initial impressions. It was not only informative but also nice to and fun to watch. I just sold my 56APD a while ago and would be interested in a comparison with the 50/1.0 as well. I rented that one for a weekend once and loved the output - there are the obvious drawbacks though and for taking it out for a walk with the family you think twice 😅 So I would love to see a bokeh comparison and general character, especially on the 40MP sensor.
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Perfect 👍 Enjoy! I am planning to go to the local dealer end of next week - if they have the time, I can try to find out, as well. Keep you posted! 😎
I’ve heard from other reviews that the AF is still very fast and the no LM was just for less added weight. Have heard the 50 is still slower due to all the glass that has to move.
I was recently fooling around with my old 56, 1.2 version and discovered that I could get much better auto focus by using the limiter. I suggest people use this technique before spending all that money on a new version that doesn’t sound like it’s improved all that much with the auto focus to justify the purchase!
On one hand I get it, on the other hand let me tell you that the AF is vastly improved, and not only that. The image quality is also very much improved. This is not too say the old one is bad, cause it's definitely not, but the premium you pay with the new one is not just a negligible AF improvement
Good video as usual Luca. I know that I’m not comparing apples to apples, but for the very few times that I photograph people and someone wants a headshot, I use the XF50 f/2 (as you suggested) and the images are more than good enough, if the family wants a portrait, the XF33 f/1.4 again is more than good enough, having said that, if I was doing professional work, I would definitely get this lens. Be well and stay safe.
Thank you Enrique. As you said, this is a professional lens, not an everyday lens. And I know the 50mm F2 is a great lens, although I have only tried it a couple of times. But it more than enough for casual shooting
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Just to give you an idea, the last time I used the XF50 f/2 was about a year ago for my wife’s passport photo, I just put a white towel behind her head and they accepted the photo, not to mention the fact that my wife told me that I’m a better passport photographer than the guy at Walmart (and she saved the seven dollars)🤣🤣🤣
The 56mm f1.2 gives you the look of an 85mm f1.8 on full frame. So technically speaking, you can get the same look for considerably cheaper on full frame. Take for example the Z 85mm f1.8 S lens on the Nikon Z system. That lens not only gives you the same look, but it also seems to perform better optically wide open. I’m really disappointed they didn’t put LM in this. ☹️
The debate on equivalence can go on and on forever. This is still a 1.2 lens, and when you are in low light you have 1 stop advantage there. I don't know that lens specifically, so I can't really confirm whether it performs better or not
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Not really, you can push ISO 1 stop in full frame and compensate for loss of light. Full frame sensors of similar generation are at least 1 stop better iso than apsc.
You can get cheaper alternatives on FF, but Fujifilm lenses generally are somewhere around or slightly below things like GM/L glass. The 85mm f1.8 Z is likely not their "pro" line since there's rumours of a f1.2 version coming out. Another strong advantage of the Fuji 56 WR is the minimum focus distance. Almost all full frame 85mm lenses have MFD of 85cm or more, making the Fujifilm 56 WR far more versatile. As for ISO, it's hard to compare since every brand has different ISO scales. E.g. Sony A7iv is brighter by 2/3 stops vs Fujifilm XH2S, so Sony ISO 1600 = Fuji 2500. Not sure about the recent Z bodies. In that sense, it's likely Sony has even better ISO sensitivity and potentially more than 1 stop advantage. FF can push higher ISO, but generally it matches due to equivalency. I was using the A7R4 and 35mm GM, shooting indoors in a cafe. In order to get the food in focus I was at f/5.6 or even f/8, and ISO 6400. On the Fuji I would be simply around f/4 around ISO 3200 or less due to the better IBIS. The noise looks rather similar after downsampling the 61MP to 26MP.
The only difference between this and the 50 f2 was… actually nothing, except this lens is more expensive, to let you know consciously that this lens is better in every way. But it’s not, no body cares but the people who bought this lens.
![[ENG] Fujifilm 18-120mm F4 LM PZ WR Initial Review](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/nuTOQQQ5bZU/mqdefault.jpg)
![[ENG] Fujifilm 18-120mm F4 LM PZ WR Initial Review](/img/tr.png)
In regards to image quality, especially sharpness and resolving power, I feel as confident shooting at 1.2 on the WR as I did at f4 with the old version.
I'm using this lens on my XT5 and I love it. The best lens I've bought so far by miles. I also have the 33mm f1.4 and the 18mm f1.4. which are both great lenses. But the 56mm f1.2 has a certain kind of magic about it.
I guess the magic is probably due to the longer focal length, which helps blurring the background. They are all great lenses, that's a
Fact
11:08 Fujifilm has incorporated 8 elements with the lens focus group that move when focusing. Thus they have managed to minimise aberration fluctuation from infinity to MOD, by moving the aperture together with the lens focus group.
To move the focus group, a DC motor is used for autofocus. They have incorporated three bearing mechanisms with the DC motor for smoother autofocus performance. The bearing mechanics ensure highly accurate control of the DC motor.
It's a technical masterpiece. -Fujifilm
Great review! This is actually my next lens, so I’m glad I found your review!
You will love it. The more I use it, the more I love it
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography I love to hear this-it will primarily be my first decent portrait lens for my X-T3, but will transition nicely to a walk around as well as when I add an X-H2s to my kit. Thanks!
I just got this lens and it’s incredible. I’m a headshot and portrait shooter and the 56 is my go to lens on my XT3. This new 56 is an amazing upgrade to an already great lens. I just ordered an XT5 and I can’t wait to try it on that camera. Fujis new lenses are really good. I also got the 33mm which is really really nice also.
The new set of primes is simply incredible
Donovan, can you talk about the 33mm. I am a portrait photographer. I photograph families (small-2 members and large-up 25 members), kids, headshots, bridal portraits, etc. My go to lens for families is the 35 1.4. How does the 33 1.4 compare?
Definitely a good step forward. The 33 is a great lens
@@anthonytriana4209 the 35mm 1.4 is a FANTASTIC lens. Probably one of the coolest lenses Fuji ever made. I loved it. Optically it’s amazing, and the images that lens resolves are unmatched. But the 33 comes VERY close in terms of “magic” with slightly better bokeh due to more aperture blades. And the focus speed and accuracy is FAR faster than the 35. It’s also noticeably sharper and focuses much closer, and it’s silent to focus. No hunting. BAM, nails focus. For faster moving subjects like kids I’d go with the 33. I have shot fast moving subjects with the 35 but the keepers on the 33 are way more. Hope that helps! Oh, and it’s slightly closer at 33 to an actual “50” FOV, vs the 35 which is more Ike a 53mm. Not a big difference but ever so slightly wider than the 35, which I love. Also, it’s weather sealed.
@@babyboy1971 Thank you for your prompt response. I’ve been really enthused about the X-H2 and the X-T5, but I might hold off and get the 33 and new 56 instead and just keep my X-T4.
What comes out of this lens is incredible. AF improved quite a lot while still keeping to deliver that magic look the old one did.
Definitely agree
Just bought this new lens and an X-T5. Loved your video, especially the fun intro. I guess I will just HAVE to subscribe now.
Well... You don't HAVE, but I'd love if you did!
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography I just did. Oh, and greetings from London, England.
Thank you for this review. It's really helpful. Is it possible for you to compare it to the Sigma 56mm 1.4?
I'll try. I need to find the sigma first, but I'll try
@Luca Petralia Photography Great to hear. I know maybe it's too much to ask for. But I guess it could be interesting to see how those two compare to each other given the price difference and the fact that the Sigma is said to be a pretty good performer as well.
I'm curious as well, don't get me wrong, but I can't afford to buy new every new lens that comes out. I'm investing already a lot in this channel. However, if and when I'll have the opportunity, I will do my best to compare them
Great video 👌 how does the image quality compare to the gf110mm ? I have the gf110 and gf80mm lenses and I’m thinking is there a must to have this lens too?
But this is for the X system. The 110 is a better lens, but it is also coupled with a different camera. I can't really compare them too much
The 110 is one of the fest G mount lenses - not comparable. But if you would look at the results in a small screen I doubt that non-photographers would note the difference - maybe in certain situations slightly side by side side as contrast may be higher with the 110 and the DoF is slightly less (1.6 vs 1.8 ish on full frame) but really the 80 will look more different due to angle of view, DoF depending on distance and will also have more color fringing to correct 😂
Whether I pick up the 50 f1 or 56mm f1.2 will come down to Af Performance…speed, accuracy, and actual hit rate. Not sure I would want to deal with the CA of the 50mm but it would be worth it if it hit focus consistently! Does your gut think lens is better than the other in that respect? I’m only interested in stills.
Based on the reviews I've seen on the 50mm, I'd say the 56 focuses faster. However those tests were done with the X-t4, while mine are done with the xh2/xh2s. This can make a big difference.
In general, having the wider aperture and moving more glass, the I'd be surprised if the 50mm did better than the 56
Hi. Please may I ask, once focus is acquired, would you trust the video AF of this lens for making talking head videos with no camera operator?
I'd say yes, although I haven't tried this specific setup (I may try however)
Thanks for your reply, Luca! I hope you can try it. It'll make a fun UA-cam video, at least!! Jesus loves you!
Great review. I was thinking you were using the 33 1.4 for recording this video. Very surprised with the 18 1.4!
The 18 is an amazing lens for this (and for several other things). Thanks for stopping by
Very nice review. Do you think that the microcontrast has been improved? This was one criticism in the previous version as far as I know. Thanks
It definitely has. It is a crisp lens, with a dreamy bookeh...
You mean contrast. It does not come in micro and macro varieties. Contrast is contrast.
@@ReflexVE Sorry but you are wrong. It is a specific concept in photography.
@@shy-guy5544 credible reviewers don't claim it. You won't see Frost, Laing, etc use the term. By definition a camera with good contrast has good 'microcontrast' however you wish to define it, and vice versa. You don't see lens manufacturers claim it for the same reason. There is no generally accepted definition of the term because it's not real.
@@ReflexVE plenty of people talk about microcontrast, if you look it up there’s articles explaining what it is exactly. I think Liang actually mentioned it specifically for this lens being improved
How does it compare to the 90mm f2 in terms of sharpness and AF speed? I have the xh2
I haven't tried the 90mm on the new cameras yet, but if I have to guess, and based on my experience, I'd say 90mm can probably beat the new 56 in speed performance. But again, I haven't performed a specific test yet
56 mm WR is absolutely amazing ,compare to third party lenses (used to own Vitlrox 56 mm 1.4 )
The colour rendering and bokeh on this lens is breathtaking . Thanks Luka for detailed review
Thanks you. And yes, this lens is otherworldly
Come si comporta l'autofocus è preciso e soprattutto fa rumore come l'obiettivo serie mk1 ?
Con il vecchio obiettivo avevo 6 foto su 10 a fuoco le altre spesso non ero fuori fuoco impossibile usare la lente in afc
Molto meglio, senza dubbi. Però come dico nella recensione, la prova l'ho fatta con le nuova macchine, magari parte del merito è loro
Hi Luca! I have just received the new XF56mm F1.2 R WR and it seems to me that it has an issue: I use it on X-E4 and it is very noisy and focus hunting constantly regardless of settings. When I press play to review photos it also makes a weird noise (as the focus inside moves) - is it the same with your copy? I have previously used XF56mm F1.2 R and I don't remember it having this focus noise. Could you advise me whether this is normal and what is your experience with the new lens? Is it possible I have a bad copy? Thanks in advance!
I had an issue where the aperture ring wasn't working properly and the weather sealing rubber didn't seal the mount correctly. I think they may have done quality control issues with this lens.
@@KOJIWITHAFUJI Was this issue with the new XF56mm F1.2 R WR? If yes - can you let me know your experience with the noise - do you hear it constantly moving inside?
I don't think you have a bad copy. When pressing play to review pictures mine moves as well. For the continuous hunting check if you accidentally activated the pre-af feature. In this case is always looking for focus and it keeps moving.
Le lens is not noisy in my opinion. Non perfectly silent, but I wouldn't say noisy
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Thanks a lot for your feedback!
GFX vives, similar wow factors... that is the sentence i've been waiting for someone to write. Fujifilm has been for years trying to squeeze some of the GFX 3d pop into the x system, and looks like the tonal resolution of the new sensor/processor and lenses is getting there.
I'd say this camera/lens combination is as close as it gets for this. Of course there is still a difference, it would be silly to think there's no gap, but this combination is insanely good
How does it compare to the 50 f2 in terms of image quality?
I haven't done a specific test on this yet. But I can definitely do it in the future
Yes! great review but please, compare this against the F1.0 and the older one as well, please!
I'll try to do it
Many thx for the presentation of your initial impressions. It was not only informative but also nice to and fun to watch.
I just sold my 56APD a while ago and would be interested in a comparison with the 50/1.0 as well. I rented that one for a weekend once and loved the output - there are the obvious drawbacks though and for taking it out for a walk with the family you think twice 😅
So I would love to see a bokeh comparison and general character, especially on the 40MP sensor.
I'm definitely going to look for one to test it out.
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Perfect 👍 Enjoy! I am planning to go to the local dealer end of next week - if they have the time, I can try to find out, as well. Keep you posted! 😎
Thanks
Update: just got the 56wr and will experiment with it today 🤩
Nice review. No LM, so I cancelled all my plans ... "a bummer", as you said... staying with the 50/1.0. A comparison would be very interesting.
I definitely want to compare them, the issue is finding a 50mm 1.0 around😅. Did you cancel your order because you were planning on using it for video?
I’ve heard from other reviews that the AF is still very fast and the no LM was just for less added weight. Have heard the 50 is still slower due to all the glass that has to move.
@@b3arodactyl and you're right. The AF is really good for such a lens
I was recently fooling around with my old 56, 1.2 version and discovered that I could get much better auto focus by using the limiter.
I suggest people use this technique before spending all that money on a new version that doesn’t sound like it’s improved all that much with the auto focus to justify the purchase!
On one hand I get it, on the other hand let me tell you that the AF is vastly improved, and not only that. The image quality is also very much improved.
This is not too say the old one is bad, cause it's definitely not, but the premium you pay with the new one is not just a negligible AF improvement
👍 Good Review! Thank you, Sir!👍
Thank you
Good video as usual Luca. I know that I’m not comparing apples to apples, but for the very few times that I photograph people and someone wants a headshot, I use the XF50 f/2 (as you suggested) and the images are more than good enough, if the family wants a portrait, the XF33 f/1.4 again is more than good enough, having said that, if I was doing professional work, I would definitely get this lens. Be well and stay safe.
Thank you Enrique. As you said, this is a professional lens, not an everyday lens. And I know the 50mm F2 is a great lens, although I have only tried it a couple of times. But it more than enough for casual shooting
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Just to give you an idea, the last time I used the XF50 f/2 was about a year ago for my wife’s passport photo, I just put a white towel behind her head and they accepted the photo, not to mention the fact that my wife told me that I’m a better passport photographer than the guy at Walmart (and she saved the seven dollars)🤣🤣🤣
🤣🤣🤣
The 56mm f1.2 gives you the look of an 85mm f1.8 on full frame. So technically speaking, you can get the same look for considerably cheaper on full frame.
Take for example the Z 85mm f1.8 S lens on the Nikon Z system. That lens not only gives you the same look, but it also seems to perform better optically wide open.
I’m really disappointed they didn’t put LM in this. ☹️
The debate on equivalence can go on and on forever. This is still a 1.2 lens, and when you are in low light you have 1 stop advantage there.
I don't know that lens specifically, so I can't really confirm whether it performs better or not
@@LucaPetraliaPhotography Not really, you can push ISO 1 stop in full frame and compensate for loss of light. Full frame sensors of similar generation are at least 1 stop better iso than apsc.
You can get cheaper alternatives on FF, but Fujifilm lenses generally are somewhere around or slightly below things like GM/L glass.
The 85mm f1.8 Z is likely not their "pro" line since there's rumours of a f1.2 version coming out. Another strong advantage of the Fuji 56 WR is the minimum focus distance. Almost all full frame 85mm lenses have MFD of 85cm or more, making the Fujifilm 56 WR far more versatile.
As for ISO, it's hard to compare since every brand has different ISO scales. E.g. Sony A7iv is brighter by 2/3 stops vs Fujifilm XH2S, so Sony ISO 1600 = Fuji 2500. Not sure about the recent Z bodies. In that sense, it's likely Sony has even better ISO sensitivity and potentially more than 1 stop advantage.
FF can push higher ISO, but generally it matches due to equivalency. I was using the A7R4 and 35mm GM, shooting indoors in a cafe. In order to get the food in focus I was at f/5.6 or even f/8, and ISO 6400. On the Fuji I would be simply around f/4 around ISO 3200 or less due to the better IBIS. The noise looks rather similar after downsampling the 61MP to 26MP.
The only difference between this and the 50 f2 was… actually nothing, except this lens is more expensive, to let you know consciously that this lens is better in every way. But it’s not, no body cares but the people who bought this lens.
The 50mm F2 is a great lens, especially considering price and size. But no way it is comparable to this in terms of image quality.