What The Good Place Teaches Us About Justice

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 бер 2020
  • The Good Place is a funny show, but it also teaches us some important lessons about justice. In this video, I take a look at how the show answers the question "What is justice?" and how that changed over the course of its four seasons.
    ♥SUPPORT ME
    Patreon (monthly): / rileyjaydennis
    PayPal (one-time): paypal.me/rileyjaydennis
    ♥SOCIAL MEDIA
    Twitter: / rileyjaydennis
    Instagram: / rileyjaydennis
    Website: www.rileyjaydennis.com
    UA-cam: / rileyjaydennis
    ♥GAL PALS PODCAST
    More info here: bit.ly/GalPalsPod
    ♥MY PRONOUNS
    She/they
    ♥PATREON SUPPORTERS
    Andrea Breanna, Carin Maja Brooks, Emily Renee, Kristen Walker, Maya Jones, Nefarious Devil, Rahn & Shaina (AKA Raina), and others who wish to remain anonymous.
    ♥MUSIC
    Lakey Inspired: / lakeyinspired
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 48

  • @MarinaSharpe
    @MarinaSharpe 4 роки тому +116

    "The point is, people improve when they get external love and support. How can we hold it against them when they don't?" - Michael

  • @katherinemorelle7115
    @katherinemorelle7115 4 роки тому +79

    There really aren’t that many shows that are both funny and deep, rich with meaning and philosophy. That really teach people while they’re watching it. And hopefully the show itself will make people think a bit about what it is to be good, and to support restorative justice over retributive justice.

  • @SatireFire
    @SatireFire 4 роки тому +45

    I just watched the finale! The ending is so satisfying. Thanks for the vid. Great analysis and editing :)

  • @professorariel
    @professorariel 4 роки тому +14

    I'd say the show even indicates the judge, demons and the other supernatural beings themselves have personalities and can get better. They're conscious beings with their own will and history just like us.
    Also, I think the show is an example of how people can easily disagree and judge with any proposal of an afterlife and ask how's that moral, but can't when the same thing is said about their religion, and their idea of Heaven, Hell, Samsara, Hades, etc.

  • @hettyscetty9785
    @hettyscetty9785 3 роки тому +6

    While I know it isn't very realistic, justice systems around the world could learn a lot from this show. Justice isn't about locking someone up and throwing away the keys. It's about retribution for doing something wrong, it's about allowing someone the opportunity to do better. That's one of the reasons the ending of the good place is so satisfying because we've seen these characters grow and we know that they've done everything possible to give people the opportunity to do better and make it into the good place and we get to see them enjoy themselves and enjoy the outcome if their work. We all can learn from this show.

  • @rosadiamonds2204
    @rosadiamonds2204 4 роки тому +2

    I've been binging the show for a third time by now. It's such a fucking good show and I'm literally recommending it to everyone I talk to

  • @pythonjava6228
    @pythonjava6228 4 роки тому +22

    Paradise for the few and hell for the many sounds a lot like earth

  • @R0DisG0D
    @R0DisG0D 4 роки тому +115

    My one problem with the show is that it fails to adress the point it raises in season 3: That life on earth is "too complicated" for anyone to actually be a good person. Every actioin has unintended consequences, and so even an act of kindness like buying flowers for your mother has a negative impact on the world. With this point established, personal improvement isn't sufficient anymore: canonically noone in hundreds of years was good enough to make it into the good place. It all but stated outright that there is no ethical consumption under capitalism.
    And the solution offered by the show is hardly one we can adapt for us. We cannot simply restart society to get rid of the unintended consequences. Instead we have to change existing society by actually adressing issues of systemic discrimination. If we simply adopt a model of restorative justice, the unintended consequences (wich really are consequences of systems of discriination) wouldn't automatically be rectified. By outsourcing it's solution to the afterlife, imo the show ignores the conditions that by its own admission constitute the problem in the first place. This isn't to say that the show is wrong in what it proposes, but rather that it is incomplete.
    Still love this show though. Rarely do you see a show utilise it's concept so well to make a point, have amazing characters and also ends before it starts to drag on. It has been a while since a piece of media resonated so much with me, in the final episode I cried tears of joy and sadness at the same time.

    • @mo9633
      @mo9633 4 роки тому

      So what’s the consequence of bring your mother flowers? And please don’t say hurting the earth

    • @R0DisG0D
      @R0DisG0D 4 роки тому +3

      @@mo9633 I don't remember the exact points the show brought up, but basically the phone the flowers were ordered on was assembled by child labour, the production process of the flowers and the delivery hurt the environment, etc.
      The show contrasted this with a person cutting flowers and bringing them to their mother a few hundred years ago and gaining points for that.
      It isn't necessairily about the flowers, but how about when doing something as simple as buying a seemingly harmless product, there may be a lot of harmful aspects involved in the production. You can research these up to a point, but the average person doesn't have the time to do so for everything, making it basically impossible to always act in an ethically responsible manner.

    • @ezgi214
      @ezgi214 4 роки тому +10

      @@mo9633 When we grow the flowers, we use stuff to keep insects away, the flowers are transported with vehicles that use oil. Both contribute to polution.

    • @hbluemole6941
      @hbluemole6941 4 роки тому

      I get your point but don't forget they are just humans, dead humans. There's no way they could get rid of the consequences in the living world from up there. Chidi cant say ,,From now on eating this sandwich isn't homophobic anymore" but he did help the people that only had negative points because of that to ultimately go into the good place. Of course if you were a good person with unknown consequences you would only need one attempt to earn your place in the good place. I hope you understand what I mean

    • @natashalawely2900
      @natashalawely2900 3 роки тому

      @@mo9633 It's not necessarily "hurting the Earth", but it IS paying money for the end of another organism's life. By The Good Place's previous point system, any happiness the flowers brought to your mother would be negated by the use of pesticides, fertilizer, lack of biodiversity, and destruction of another organism's life.

  • @KarolMarcjan
    @KarolMarcjan 4 роки тому +5

    I've finished the show so I could watch this without spoilers.
    So here's one for the algorithm.

  • @mehlover
    @mehlover 4 роки тому +8

    Loved this show and your essay! I'm hoping these two will encourage people to consider more of restorative justice system

  • @pythonjava6228
    @pythonjava6228 4 роки тому +53

    Hands down one of the best shows of the decade!

    • @dushy35
      @dushy35 4 роки тому +1

      better than game of thrones ?

    • @pythonjava6228
      @pythonjava6228 4 роки тому +4

      @@dushy35 Definitely. Especially with the insult that was season 8

  • @julie7238
    @julie7238 4 роки тому +4

    enjoying your videos on this fantastic show!! it quickly became one of my favourites of all time and the finale really cemented that

  • @BSR-zy2so
    @BSR-zy2so 4 роки тому +23

    As much as I liked the show, I feel like the solution they came up with still had some flaws. In particular, it felt like the moral system used to measure the progress of the humans was very subjective, as I would argue that any moral system is. I could reasonably argue that many of the actions that the system deemed “bad” were actually good from a different ethical lens, and vice-versa. Forcing individuals to eternally participate in a test until they adopt your morality seems immoral to me and is akin to brainwashing.
    If I were designing the system, I would have included an option to live in an Earth-like plane minus the mandatory death and with the Euthanasia option designed for the good place if they decided against being tested. Also, I would be more interested in seeing people develop their own moral philosophies, rather than forcing my own on someone. I would have testing participants reason out their own moral philosophy before the test and judge them based on how closely they followed their moral precepts. At the end of the test, they could alter their philosophies based on nuances that they may not have considered before. In which case, they would be tested again based on their new moral system. They would be permitted to decline testing at any time and return to the earth-plane once an individual test was completed. If the person found a moral code that they were able to live by and be treated in accordance with, then they could go to their own heaven plane and create biological copies of loved ones. They could even enter another’s heaven plane with permission. Their world would be governed by their morals, but they could go through testing at any time to create new moral systems or even return to the earth plane.
    I know it’s not perfect, but I feel that it’s a better system than the show ended on. This system wouldn’t dogmatically assert a universal “good” and “bad,” which I think oversimplifies morality as a whole. Also, it would give each individual the greatest amount of autonomy possible.

    • @jenglishmann2355
      @jenglishmann2355 4 роки тому +3

      I think that you've hit the nail on the head there. The show has the structure of the journey right: humans fare better and do better things when they are with other humans. But the content of the show implies that there IS an absolute moral good, which just isn't the case. Morality is subjective.

    • @hbluemole6941
      @hbluemole6941 4 роки тому +7

      But that's what I like about it, it's flawed. Just like every system will be - there can't be an ultimate test for something this subjective. As Eleanor said to Michael, they dont know if another system will take over because it could always change, just like living on earth does

  • @hannavignolo6454
    @hannavignolo6454 4 роки тому +15

    Michel Foucault aproves this message

  • @bobguy3939
    @bobguy3939 4 роки тому +12

    Disco Janet

  • @shockingheaven
    @shockingheaven 4 роки тому +2

    I'll miss this wonderful show

  • @UshioKiss
    @UshioKiss 4 роки тому

    Excellent break down. thank you for the video!

  • @MagnoliaPantherWoman
    @MagnoliaPantherWoman 4 роки тому +1

    Excellent. Thank you.

  • @Luna_Christine
    @Luna_Christine 4 роки тому +2

    Great show on the Philosophy of Morality

  • @Hou413
    @Hou413 3 роки тому +1

    “Each of us is more than the worst thing we've ever done.” - Bryan Stevenson

  • @Yoooonis
    @Yoooonis 4 роки тому

    This is so relevant. Especially now

  • @moonstarstories1298
    @moonstarstories1298 3 роки тому +1

    Justice is actually a topic in my tutoring class! It's pretty interesting to see it here.
    P.S When you mentioned William Shakespeare, I thought of that what humans consider a good person may be different.

  • @MeryRodVar
    @MeryRodVar 4 роки тому +1

    I wish you could make a video essay about anne with an e feminism (or any other topic about the show). Your video essays are amazing.

  • @SallyLock103emeCaris
    @SallyLock103emeCaris 4 роки тому +4

    Thanks for this great video :)

  • @moonstarstories1298
    @moonstarstories1298 3 роки тому +1

    1:21 What if I'm curious what blowing my nose like that sounds?

  • @Samuel115s
    @Samuel115s 4 роки тому +1

    Very interesting. The justice system dose need this type of reform.

  • @LoudlyListening
    @LoudlyListening 4 роки тому

    Goodness I Fucking love this show 💞💛

  • @elsiemon
    @elsiemon 4 роки тому

    Precisely

  • @recordplayer-jpeg3193
    @recordplayer-jpeg3193 4 роки тому

    What platform can I watch the finale on? I have Netflix, but it ends on season 3.

  • @epicmonkey6663
    @epicmonkey6663 4 роки тому

    This would be my afterlife system when you die before you get to go to a good place you experience any unjustified emotional or physical suffering that you've caused to others and you experience their emotional pain for as long as they have had to live with it and any physical pain as well so if it take somebody 12 years to get over a violent burglary that's how long is that person who caused the pain would experience it for and that's just one person there's a whole list of people who's pain that some people would have to experience it might even take them decades to reach the good place it really depends on the person and the life they lived

  • @moonstarstories1298
    @moonstarstories1298 3 роки тому

    1:21 Can I do it when I'm alone and not bothering anyone? (The blowing nose one.)

  • @femmefuntime
    @femmefuntime 4 роки тому +2

    So if the place we see in the show isn’t the good place, what is it?
    This show also takes a stance against grading on a curve.

    • @onlyAerik
      @onlyAerik 4 роки тому +1

      I take it you haven't watched it?
      the demon Michael (Ted Danson) had an idea to create a version of the bad place that's disguised as the good place. He places 4 people (the primary cast) there amongst a town full of demons in disguise so that they grate on each other and grow more hateful and resentful and toxic and bad until they become their own torturers. So the demons involved could laugh their asses off at it for all eternity.

    • @summermermaidstar756
      @summermermaidstar756 4 роки тому +1

      The original "good place" was a torture simulator with demon actors where they use the 4 carefully selected humans (Our protagonists) to torment each other. It wasn't the actual good place.
      Riley didn't go over the final seasons conclusion as it isn't related to justice and instead tackles the issues with a permanent paradise. In a world where everything is amazing all the time, eventually us humans would be numb to the feeling. If nothing ever bad happens, then the good things that happen to us just become normal regular life.
      Eleanor and the rest of the protagonists then create a system where paradise isn't permanent, they make an "exit door". You are free to stay in the good place for however long you want, BUT there is an exit door who will destroy your very essence. Basically it's a peaceful "Permasleep" button so nobody is stuck in said afterlife. When you are ready to go, you can go. Rather then a paradise that eventually loses its charm

  • @smokeymcbongwater4141
    @smokeymcbongwater4141 4 роки тому +1

    Fake