Timeless Questions & Gospel Insights Lecture 1: Cosmos & Creation | Truman Madsen

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @HaleStorm49
    @HaleStorm49  6 років тому +30

    Lecture 1: Creation & Cosmos
    @1:30 The most disastrous marriage that ever occurred was the marriage of Greek Philosophy and Hebrew Christianity. There has never been a divorce.
    @9:15 The world’s rejection of the book of Abraham
    @9:40 Eternal Nature of Element. Chaotic Matter and its inherent glory
    @11:00 Pure principles of element are yours forever.
    @11:10 The Earth and the World are not synonymous. We are participants with the Earth in transformation. Two Bible verses are incorrectly translated and lose this meaning.
    @12:25 The Earth’s origin and progression
    @12:50 Jews believe the Earth had to be veiled from sources or intense light.
    @13:10 Science has discovered stars a TRILLION times brighter than ours. Isaiah said that God dwells in everlasting burnings. Fire purifies & glorifies.
    @14:35 The book of Abraham talks about the creation not as days, but as “times”
    @15:00 IN the day you eat of the fruit you shall surely die. What does this mean?
    @15:50 Greek ideas of time & space vs Christian ideas vs Modern Revelation
    @18:10 How long is an eternity?
    @19:45 Density of black hole
    @20:30 Life in the universe? Do elements contain life? Do they possess consciousness?
    @21:58 Inhabitants of other worlds are saved by same truths and powers as we.
    @24:20 Tremendous knowledge learned EONs ago manifested as faith
    Adam having dominion over the Earth means he is already in the likeness of God
    @25:14 Heraclitus on the reality of change, but how then is God unchanging?
    @26:40 Abraham & Kolob
    @29:20 “I AM that I AM” Hebrew reading can mean, “I WILL Become what I WILL Become”
    @35:20 John Taylor mocked in the 1870s for suggesting our cosmos began with a “tremendous explosion” This is widely accepted today.
    @37:20 If the universe is infinite, can it possess a center? Will we be able then to travel faster (much faster) than 186k miles/sec?
    @40:20 Can any father claim his title without a mother? Do universal principles only apply to the creation or to the creator also?
    We can count the seeds in an apple, but can we count the apples in a seed? The fullness of the glory of the Father is a "fullness and a continuation of the seeds" This is the significance of the promise made to Abraham.

    • @jeanrakisits7005
      @jeanrakisits7005 6 років тому

      Oh Hale YEAH!
      the happy year through

    • @ruexcited2WholeHearted
      @ruexcited2WholeHearted 5 років тому

      Thanks!

    • @otuafirst9122
      @otuafirst9122 4 роки тому

      I JUST LANDED ON A JACKPOT, THANK YOU SO MUCH

    • @michaelwunderlich8111
      @michaelwunderlich8111 4 дні тому

      4kb v. N nnb8 ji676f😮7in jji ok 999gddidd b7 v b 🎉g t 6uI I 6 u ry v f 5G hi by 8iib😢ik. 🎉bnn9 bb 7 8h 8i b 7fh😊 🎉bring 9 v😅t uh b y6 h.

    • @michaelwunderlich8111
      @michaelwunderlich8111 4 дні тому

      Hhbb66b 😊 b cr6b v😅8😮and vh😮 i😮😮

  • @louccideavon7116
    @louccideavon7116 6 років тому +17

    While I love Hugh nibley, I really do believe that Truman is the most relevant Lds scholar for unveiling the beauty and intellectual bottomless pit of mormon philosophy. Nibley focused more on discussions of antiquity and historicity, which don't get me wrong I find compelling and interesting. Nibley also unpacks our doctrine in relevant ways. but with Madsen's philosophical exploration of mormonism im already convinced of mormonism just from understanding its ideas and implications rather than historical arguments. "Which God is more worthy of our love?"

    • @cokkep
      @cokkep 5 років тому +1

      This, for me, is not a dichotomy. I love them both, and both teach me things that edify ...

    • @kinger609
      @kinger609 10 місяців тому

      Wow....Beautifully said!

  • @ofelia829
    @ofelia829 3 роки тому +1

    Full of light.
    Thank you so much for uploading.🌻✨

  • @ourlifeinwashington4114
    @ourlifeinwashington4114 5 років тому +2

    Thank you for the Real Truman show! May it strengthen and nourish my body. You get it.

  • @sydneybond8793
    @sydneybond8793 5 років тому +3

    Fabulous. Thank you Truman. Oh Hale YEAH thanks for the post.

  • @ryanpalmquist4823
    @ryanpalmquist4823 3 роки тому

    BEST. CHANNEL. EVER!!!!

  • @robertthompson3447
    @robertthompson3447 4 роки тому +2

    To anyone who is having trouble understanding mainstream christianity, this lecture is for you!!

  • @penelopelambson9128
    @penelopelambson9128 4 роки тому +6

    Not sure if this lecture makes me feel insignificant or enormously significant.

    • @HaleStorm49
      @HaleStorm49  4 роки тому +1

      It depends which direction you are facing;)

  • @gannynnewbold1215
    @gannynnewbold1215 5 років тому +2

    Loved it ❤️

  • @littleiamful
    @littleiamful 5 років тому

    Omgosh. 💕💕💕💕

  • @arielilariooredvi257
    @arielilariooredvi257 4 роки тому

    The reason for why man suffers is just the process of answering a question God the Father places on the induvidual in means of helping out by means of burdens of relinquished spirit or intellectuals merit badge is attained either by God or his handy upper class Elders... after sufferage is baned from the network of the individual...

  • @LIOTBs
    @LIOTBs 5 років тому

    Love it! Is there a way to get this in writing with the references? Did he do that? Also, there are one or two things in this that he contradicts in later lectures, but still love this!

    • @HaleStorm49
      @HaleStorm49  5 років тому +1

      Not that I am aware of, I'd certainly love to have them. Can you elaborate on the later contradictions?

    • @LIOTBs
      @LIOTBs 5 років тому

      Later he quotes Joseph Smith stating that God is in the "eternal now" where time does not exists and that past and the future are one. Here in this lecture he contradicts that. Maybe later he changes his thinking. I didn't feel the Spirit at all when ht talked about time and God's perception of time, etc. God and Christ are outside of time. Time is malleable to God we are only placed in it. When prophet tell of the future, it's because they are only reporting on events that they saw and were commanded to share. It's not as Brother Madsen describes it. They actually see into the future, the Book of Mormon and Joseph Smith's patriarchal blessing are very clear about this. Time travel is possible to God, but unlawful to us and would destroy the atonement. Christ's atonement, faith, and other principles and powers are outside of time or and can effect both forwards and backwards, thus the effect of having faith on the atonement which to the ancients' perception had not happened yet, but yet it was in force as they were worthy to have the Gift of the Holy Ghost, receive revelation, etc. The atonement is infinite and to God's perspective always has been. So just a few things. @@HaleStorm49
      Thank you for getting back with and for posting all these things from brother Madsen. He was the original person that got me studying the Gospel and to really love Joseph Smith!

    • @ej3382
      @ej3382 5 років тому +1

      @@LIOTBsLet me have a listen and get back to you on the time thing, it's been a while since hearing this lecture.

    • @LIOTBs
      @LIOTBs 5 років тому

      Sounds good, but no worries. And thanks for keeping in touch.

    • @ej3382
      @ej3382 5 років тому +1

      Ok my friend I think i can see where the misunderstanding is..
      At the beginning of the lecture Madsen mentions how the absorption of Greek Philosophy into Hebrew Christianity is a disastrous marriage, where a divorce has never taken place. I believe that he means that ancient Greek philosophy skews correct doctrine.
      So if you skip to the 15:50 to 17:10 mark, Madsen makes a comment on the concept of God and time, according to the Greeks.
      If I understand him clearly he isn't agreeing with Plato or Augustine who assert that God exists outside of time and space. He's saying the opposite, that God is indeed subject to preexisting Eternal constructs of time and space. Hope that helps.