MQ9 Reaper Crash Su-27 Fighter Jets | How it Crash
Вставка
- Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
- Comment below your Versions
who knows we might redo the entire Animation base on the Assumptions above.
Choose Scenario 1 ,2 or 3 or Comment to help us Animate better.
The MQ-9 Reaper is the primary offensive strike unmanned aerial vehicle for the U.S. Air Force, took it’s first flight in the year 2001, at an estimated Cost of $32 million.
While the Russian Sukhoi Su-27, Natoh designation Flanker, is a Russian air-superiority fighter plane, introduced into the air forces in 1985.
Used by Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Indonesia, India, China, and Vietnam it was built at an Estimated cost of around $35 million.
Find us on Facebook
/ aitelly-1089. .
Support us in Buy Me a Coffee
www.buymeacoffee.com/aitelly
Instagram
/ aitelly3d
Twitter
/ aitelly3d
We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe
www.blender.org/download/
Peace Out
As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers. - Фільми й анімація
Please Sub
Thank you
ok
@@damntrain1494 Thanks
you made a video in such a short time from what happened, that's amazing.
yes for sure I'll Sub!
@@ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow Yes in 2 days , with just 1 guy .Stay tune for next week much Better Quality
Already done ✅
That Sukhoi pilot might be the first pilot to record a kill without even firing a bullet.
what we saw in the news the Rules of Engagment - No weapons in Intertational Waters so this was the only way the Russian could take out the Drone.
But a few years back On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.
@@Aitelly waht
he escaped death thats for sure.. fuel + sparks =
No. In WW2 an ace (i think it was a polish ace in the battle of britain but i cant remember or find the source) killed an enemy plane which he chased for a long time at treetop altitude by flying very close above it startling the enemy pilot and forcing him instinctively to pull down thus crashing the plane. The ace did that because he ran out of ammo. An american pilot also scored a kill with no bullet fired in the pacific theater.
Not exactly. In late WW2, a British pilot (I think using their first jet, the Gloster Meteor) downed a V1 Rocket (a German kamikaze drone/missile) by tipping his wings on the V1's wing. Reason is that the Gloster Meteor often faced the issue of it's canons jamming. Hence, the last resort.
I like that you just tell us about accident. Not even a word about "bad russians" or "bad americans", only facts. Respect
Don't know what exactly happened, but since both Russian flankers were able to land normally....gotta admit they must have some legendary flying skills. I mean no missiles and still downed a top notch drone. That requires talent
They were following the rules of engagement no Weapons allowed on international Waters
@@Aitelly а когда это сами Соединённые Штаты соблюдали международные законы и правила ведения войны , уважая суверенитет других государств , если начиная с 1945 года и по сию пору Вашингтон сверг более 70 законно избранных правительств по всему Земному шару ???
@@Aitelly they didn't know Russians don't need weapons to put someone or something down 😉
Yup
Probably a highly skilled and well trained pilot
@@Aitelly At least praise the skills of Russian pilot.
Us used its advanced fighter jet to knock out a balloon and russia knock out us armed drone without using a single bullet or missile.
Edit:- appreciation for being neutral in this vedio
Thanks
The American government and capitalists are simply fomenting a war, and making money from the war in Ukraine. They do not understand that only they want a war, and not the people of Russia or the United States. I hope that the idiot capitalists have the brains not to start such a war just to make money.
Well the ballon was just above the surface ceiling of the f22 an they didnt use gun as the shells would not detonate from hitting a ballon so a missile was required an taking down they could have easily used guns an i can only assume the reason they didn’t was probably because that pilot would be told to take it down without destroying it for recovery reminds me when during the cold war as Soon after a u-2 was detected, Lieutenant General of the Air Force Yevgeniy Savitskiy ordered the air-unit commanders "to attack the violator by all alert flights located in the area of foreign plane's course, and to ram if necessary" an one soviet pilot shot down by friendly anti air missile
Much cheaper than using an AIM 9X Sidewinder from a F22 to shoot down a balloon. Hoorah!
I think they are Russian are not to Escalate in International Waters
and succed at the second attempt
but the R-27 is much cheaper than the Reaper, and the Su-27 also has a gun. Therefore, the reason for the ram is definitely not the price.
I love how you focus on the technical aspect without leaning towards any sides. Very educational !
Great video good job!
subbed
Thanks 🙏👍
But his source of information is from a Western propaganda point of view, so it can't really be said that he doesn't really lean on one side. In any case, I appreciate the effort.
Give us a video on the f22 not being able to shoot down a balloon in its first shot.
Stupid troll.
What the hell is the US doing in the Black Sea anyway??
NATO
Because the Black Sea is not only russia. It is also Turkey, Bulgaria, Romania(NATO) and Ukraine. Check the map.
@@bewareofthedg It is not necessary to stick your nose everywhere, especially where there are military operations. You can lose your nose...
@@AitellyExactly, and the aggressive behavior of NATO (and it's core member states US, UK & France) is the sole reason for the war.
Western hypocrisy in motion.. ☜ (↼_↼)
Tryin to make war with Russia
. Like napoleon. Hitler now Biden
Try spraying kerosene into your car's air filter while the engine is running and you will see how it behaves, there is no secret. The engine runs on air.
The Sukhoi maneuvers great, even the F-15 and Rafale have never maneuvered like that
But the F15 was not built for dogfights .
Also, yeah the sukhoi is amazing in maneuvers!
That's basically a tail slide. But you often see it in heavy fighter such as F14. (Coincidently both F14 and flanker series have very similar aft section design). But yeah, i never see F15 or Rafale doing that (but i might overlooked them).
@@ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow not? USA s air superiority fighters: F15,F22
... the su-27 has maneuvers which are also called "airshow maneuvers"... why? cause they make you lose all your speed and in modern day dogfights speed is life.
No matter what that Russian pilot earned global respect not for Russian intentions but for its great piloting skills.
You did a great job describing all the possible scenarios, although I think that the su 27 did not suffer severe wing damage in this case, if the tip hit the propeller as you said in the video 👍
I like it ♥️
Yes Agreed but the US Airforce Command suggest the SU27 Suffered severe damage
@@Aitelly thanks for the information 😊♥️
Wich is better Turkish drones or usa drones or Chinese ?
@@arnyarny7991 well any drone in its class is the best, there is also a ratio of price/effectiveness that we should take into consideration, turkish drones proved to be effective and low cost asset in a battle field with low air defense protection, same thing goes for the Chinese drones I think, the US drones are more sophisticated but expensive so the loss of one drone is already a big deal.
@@Aitelly I don't think that's true... they've to announce something to the public and the peoples to keep them boiled down which is that the enemy has also suffers the damage at the result of collision 💥...!
Russian way of advertising cheap gas is great 😂
Bullseye!!! 🏹🎯
Какой высший вилотажь у летчиков,так ювилирно задеть пропеллер этой консервной банки,высший пилотажь молодцы наши ребята.
Lucky pilot, and extremely unprofessional.
@@bryanwozniak8861 Непрофессиональный пилот сбил бы дрон ракетой или из пушки..
Great skill of the pilot without needing to fire a bullet or missile at fast moving target unlike the huge slow white weather balloon that needed to be taken down by a stealth jet with quarter million dollars missile.
No Use of weapons allowed in Internationation Water - by the Russian Airforce - Trying not to Escalate the Situation - i think
It's very funny that none tell possibility to damage the propeller with kinetic energy of dumped fuel. SU-27 was very near to the reaper so this scenario was very possible. The fact is that stabiliser was not damaged if there was contact between them, will be damaged to.
This is probably what happened. The minor prop bending was caused by the density of the fuel in combination with the thrust vectoring. If there’d have been actual physical contact the damage to the propellers would have been significant, not just a bend and would have affected all the blades. Plus this also explains why we don’t see a complete video showing the actual contact.
I seriously don't get why so many people deny the dumped fuel scenario do they not know how much pressure the fuel dump creates
@@dirckthedork-knight1201 на этом самолёте нет технической возможности сброса топлива
👏👍
@@dirckthedork-knight1201 probably not but they can try it to themself ;)
1:16 a small correction. India doesn't exactly use Su-27, but the Su-30, precisely, the Su-30MKI variant, built for India specifically. I had to point out because Su-27 is single seater, while Su-30s are twin/tandem seater.
agreed we missed that
@Tailor series India and ASEAN were usually hyped about their military stuff especially you praise it lol
Then another clarification. Su-30 fighters are also used by: Armenia, Algeria, Venezuela, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, Uganda.
Dear author of the channel, I think the drone was damaged by the afterburner of the engines, and not by the wing of the Su-27. The power of 2 afterburner engines is enough to overturn a light car, a very powerful and hot stream. If it was a wing touch, then all the blades would be damaged, and not just one, as in the video. Regards and greetings from Russia.
Thanks good Feedback
That is almost impossible. SU 27 is too fast to arrange position in front of reaper while reaper is too slow as reaper fly by gliding. Too slow will not enought lifting force.
@@kartinosurodipo4520 Everything is possible. Watch the maneuver "Cobra Pugachev" on the Su-27 and you will immediately understand. It can slow down to 100-150 km per hour for a few seconds.
@@Vitamin_71 No, cobra maneouver is possible because it goes up so lifting and speed is balanced. A jet cannot slow down while moving forward as jet cannot glide.
@@kartinosurodipo4520 Su-27 does not go up, it just raises its fuselage by 90 degrees and continues to move.
The colliding the plane with the propeller scenario is just ridiculous.
🙃✅
Пропеллер сделан из дешёвых полимеров. Он расплавился от топлива.
Looks like collision would take tail wing also, not just propeller.
That's exactly what happened you can see from the original released video the damaged propeller after the jet hit it.
@@antoniok4735 Yeah, I saw the damaged propeller. Just seems difficult to avoid colliding V-shaped tail wing. Propeller arc is quite small.
The hard work this channel put to make a video like this needs more appreciation.
Thanks next Friday a very detailed Video of around 12 minutes.
work*
Точная работа пилота сухого. Браво!
I think that fighterpilot simply pees on the drone 😂😂😂
:)
I Appreciate your hardwork for making this animation video.🙏
Thanks
It is not the first time in our history that Russian pilots have "watered" enemy planes with fuel. The bottom line is that after the fuel, you heat it up with engines. And in the video itself, it can be seen that the screw rather melted due to poor assembly, or incorrect materials, and not because of the impact. Rather, someone saved on material when assembling the MQ-9.
wow bro, the best animation about the incident.
your animation is better then US defence and big media like BBC and CNN
Thanks - Next week even beeter Content almost 45 dyas of work and research put into our upcoming Video
Your work is commendable dude 😎. Definitely gonna share this channel to my knowns.
What actually happened is probably the fuel sprayed on top of the drone got sucked in from the air intake on the back of the drone, and then exploded in the exhaust pipe right on front of the propeller(on the back end of the top of the drone), the explosion warped 2 out of 4 propeller blades, the engine was probably already destroyed during the explosion, in the later video showing the broken propeller, the propeller wasn't spinning by the engine, it was just slightly moving because of wind.
As far as is known from open sources, this aircraft does not have a fuel discharge system, especially since the smoke in the video is not fuel, at least because this smoke comes out of the engines and if it were fuel, it would burn.
@@Putov_Ilya It would not burn, the engine exhaust is not enough to burn the fuel.
This aircraft does have a fuel discharge system connected to the afterburner. the pilot can dump fuel out by not igniting the afterburner.
Downing a plane without firing any missile or gun. Wow!
I don't see how the russian jet pilot will risk his life and the aircraft by touching the propeler. This seems ridiculous. I think as per videos from the drone, the first time, they didn't quite well spill the fuel, but on the second pass, the russians managed better and the fuel damaged the engine through the engine intake. This animation must have been made before the footage of the drone has been released, but it still makes no sense. I'm not trying to be offensive 😊
Agreed from all the comments we got .It safe to assum that it's an Accident. The Russian pilot simply did not want to damage his own Aircraft.
Remember that we live in the age of deep fakes. For me personally, I wouldn't trust any video/radar and/or satellite footage released by US Government/Pentagon.
Their standard procedure is always, always to control the narrative at any cost, whether it's factual or not. History shows mostly not.
/🖖👽✨
I think the engine burning theory is a bit far fetched as the drone was probably flying below Sukhoi stall speed, so they couldn't maintain the same speed as each other. This is probably also the reason why they had to do pretty wild angle fuel dump runs on the drone, since they couldn't just simply position themselves above the drone.
I think he ment that it was attempted to be ignited after the fuel had been dumped on it so the exhaust may ignite the drone easily
Highly likely Russian wanted the drone to survive in some form after the crash to reverse engineer, or else they could have just hit it with a AA missile or used the canon to blow it up
I heard they are trying to recover the drone
i doubt that. Russia has a way more advanced drone, S-70 Ohotnik (Hunter), now it's being tested
@@player1GR you praise russia like a god. First off its not even about getting intel for better tech. Its can also be getting intel to understand its weakness or maybe how to jam it or something. But sure Russia dont need to learn from other because russia is god and west are dumb evils right?
@@player1GR true but still it's always better to see what your enemy has , i mean remember that mig 25 that landed in japan ?
@@player1GR its not about wether the drone is advance but rather they want to know a way to counter this drones should they face against it
Appears you've underestimated fuel energy and left out SU thrust. The difference in speed at engagement is also off. On whole, good job
In Soviet Russia, fuel dumps you!
Я думаю большой объём топлива попал в воздухозаборник дрона, после чего произошла детонация этого топлива в двигателе дрона, с отказом его работы
А как пропеллер тогда повредился? И у этого самолета нет сброса топлива
Being in international waters is also speculative. Emil Cosman argues from the topography of the official footage that it could not have been the 22 kms asserted by the Pentagon, but only a few kms or miles off the Crimean coast.
Still the cost of engagement for the Russians was a lot less than the $400,000 spent on the two missiles to down a balloon, and that's not counting the cost of the aircraft deployment.
I would like to congratulate you how accurate and fast you prepared this video after a couple of days from event
Thanks for understanding the amount of Work it requires to pull this off with just 1 guy.
Next Video on a veray popular tank
@@Aitelly Вам намекнули этим комментарием, что Ваше видео - враньё.)
@@Toha14, это точно, они и верят только сми. Сказочники ляпуют, во что хотят верить - помельчал разум человеческий. Что бы и как бы там не написали - все у них правда, другому мнению и быть нельзя. 35млн.$ Су-27 в РФ не стоит. От касания полукрылом на скоростях винт бы в щепки разлетелся и законцовка полукрыла ВС была бы повреждена.
MQ9 Reaper:
- just don't hit me! Just piss on me!
Su-27:
-ок
Aitelly is the best and most updated military animation 🔥
Appreciate you posting the video so fast... please continue your good work.
And they turned off the transponder.... Go figure...
But man that pilot's skill... Ace materials
what we saw in the news the Rules of Engagment - No weapons in Intertational Waters so this was the only way the Russian could take out the Drone.
But a few years back On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.
i love this new style of video explaining a situation and variations of it
Thanks 🙏👍
@@Aitelly next time you do a video like this you should also talk about alternative ways to avoid situations like the collision in this one
It is impossible to damage a single propeller blade without damaging the other blades.
lol
Are you making a video about the lancet drone? Anyways thanks for your amazing content(:
There is very little information about it.
Next week a much detail video of the Abrams tank
better make a video about Reaper
Reaper got ripped apart without going into an actual fight with the Russians!
вряд ли крыло пострадало от столкновения настолько что это могло привести к гибели самолета, этот самолет очень тяжелый и потрясающи живучий, этот самолет умеет летать так как не способен летать не один натовский самолет, вы не учитываете скорость и вес машины а также материалы из которых сделан су 27 и беспилотник, к тому же летчик не стал бы жертвовать своим самолетом что бы сбить американский драндулет ценой собственной машины, русские летчики очень любят свои машины на которых летают а этот обмен не равноценный потерять один из лучших самолетов которых у рф не сказать что много ради летающего американского "недоразумения" такой себе размен.
US Pentagon : A higly unresponsible and unprofessional maneuver...
Dude that Su27 is probably an expert pilot doing a higly profesional maneuver!! Both fighters landed safely so that's tell us a lot about the jets building quality and pilot skills
Go pump 20ltrs of fuel into a jerry can and feel the weight of it. Now quadruple it and imagine it being thrown on top of a drone. More than likely this was the cause of the bent prop
Are you sure I thought I saw it clipping the propellers.
The propellers got Bent
@@Aitelly there isn't a video showing direct contact with propeller
Awesome scenarios and animation!
Thanks for the Visit.
Destroy the lot of weddings 😂
Hooking a drone's propeller with an airplane is like knocking down the ashes of a passer-by's cigarette with a car mirror. I believe in the version with dropping the SU 27 parachute onto a drone. 😁😄🤣
This channel just continues to deliver i am glad that i subbed and i look forward to tue future of this channel!!
Much appreciated!
The great amount of kerosine is like a big stone for the airscrew. Check the density of fuel to air!
First kill in Aviation history, SU27 didn’t fire a single round or missile, he just peee on drone😂
Scenario 4: the pilot opened the window and hit the drone with a shovel.
Great Job at making video in quick time especially about Important News Update. 👍👏
On my opinion, I prefer option 3 because dumping fuel on the drone won't make drone propeller dead, and dumping fuel on drone is a high risk because if there is spark in the fuel when it's dumped it will burn both the drone and fighter.
Agreed but it did not work so I guess they accidentally hit the drone
@@Aitelly thank you for you hard work and opinion.
I think they wanted the fuel to enter the engine intake probably and cause some sort of malfunction
That is a possible theory
Fuel can light up and possibly distroy engine
Dumb a few galon avtur ,an Rusia get 32 mil mq9 reaper..ITS,jackpot🎉..smart pilot
Nobody touched the propeller of the drone. on cameras
mq are directed to the screw - this is clearly visible. When a propeller touches a wing or tail, even if the propeller is idling, it will explode into atoms.
Track 27 is not a fuel dump, but a contrail from the afterburner and overtaking maneuver.
The UAV simply blew off the afterburner with mode 27.
I salute the Russian pilot ❤️...love from India
could it be Flanker D with landing hook? Russia has whole squadron that used to be on carrier Kuznjecov, all equiped with landing hook that isnt vital to aircraft but it could easely be droped to kill propeller or even brake a ving of any drone?!
Nice Feedback
if they use the hook then the whole blades and the V tail should be damaged too, i don't think it was Su-33 since it doesnt have any canard so its not have hook for carrier
nice job from you and Flanker..
Amazing sukhoi pilot!🎉
Guys who still keep saying that there was a touch with the drone, are you all right? Is everithing ok with your eyes, your brains and logic? The reaper's propeller cannot be touched without hitting the tail. The damage was caused solely by fuel and the laws of physics.
I think the pilot knew it would cause s bit of damage to the fighter jet but as he was coming from behind it would only be minor damage that would not affect its flight much and would be easily repaired it was with it to collect the drone later with minimum damage to the drones
Great Informative Comment 👍
Wow, I stumbled upon your channel and I am impressed by the quality of your videos! Your attention to detail and creativity is truly impressive. Keep up the amazing work, looking forward to more!
We did it in 2 days so stay tune for Next Friday Animation we took 45 days to finish that
@@Aitelly Sure sure, even I have a UA-cam channel too where I'm exploring the world of 3D modeling and animation. And your channel has definitely given me some great ideas!
@@glim3d.learning Thanks for the Tutorials .
You are the real Heros!
Ok. please prepare another video animation for another UAV to be gunned down soon😁
@@wendelllagaday7244 We do wot we do
great job on making it more detailed
Thank you! Cheers!
Your videos are amazing all the explanations are excellent it's easy to understand
Glad you like them! Thanks a 1000 ton
@@Aitelly i hope you get a million subscribers
@@Tarotbysangeeta Let's hope so
Ballon in USA.
Sidewinder 320.000 dollar rocket and F22 5th fighter.
Fighter Drone in Black Sea - little Galons of a Su27 3-4gen fighter. 0.0 Dollar for a weapon. Nice Russia skills pilot. Cheers
what we saw in the news the Rules of Engagment - No weapons in Intertational Waters so this was the only way the Russian could take out the Drone.
But a few years back On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.
Virgin US engineer: Noooo, you can`t take down my super drone without firing at it!
Chad Russian pilot: Sorry, big boy, did not see your toy while dumping my fuel
Sukkoi pilot is well experienced
Keep doing AiTelly
Thanks 🙏👍
First time I have seen canons on a reaper drone. If it was just doing observation and intelligence I doubt it had weapons. But I do think they should put a self destruct load on it, so not to be recovered, or better jet destruct while the enemies jets are close in self defence
I think the mass of the fuel combined with the speed it's moving at the propeller is enough to bend it.
Agreed
@@Aitelly But only one blade ?! I can tell you the video's only show the drenching attempts and i bet in the end the Su did a close pass offering one of it's vertical ampenages to the prop . That's safe and proffesional :)
Add that to the jet exhaust of an accelerating Su-27. That may have been enough in itself to break one or both of the drone's stabilizers and throw the resulting debris backwards into its propeller.
@@w.benson3011 Actually this is the only non contact scenario that is possible . For the ones that think fuel is capable to bend blades i can recoment watching low prop seaplanes in choppy water .
@@ketelin4285 the problem is the traveling speed of the liquid. It's like the equivalent of getting hosed by a firehose on steroid.
A short burst of air cannon would blast the drone out of the sky in no time. Much more effective, and zero risk.
No Use of weapons allowed in Internationation Water - by the Russian Airforce - Trying not to Escalate the Situation -
describing the content while maintaining neutrality without saying this side is bad or that side is bad is really tough but you manage to do it so far, thats unique thing you have so keep it up on track. nowadays many ''military channel'' are pretending to be neutral but their narrative clearly leaning to one side, so by having a pretty balanced and neutral views is pretty rare.
hopefully you'll make same content about T-90M Proryv and Type-10 Hitomaru.
Yes t90 we are modeling and animating the Autoloader .
Thanks for the feedback
OK. Let write about WWII neutral.
Scenario 4: The Russian pilot his opened cockpit and manually whacked the drone out of the sky with a SHOVEL.
Su-27 Pilot didn't get the permission to fire .
Love ur videos ❤❤❤
Thanks
Is it easy to hit only the propeller ? Not sure !
I think it's an accident
Was waiting for the part where the shovel was used.
Thanks Rahul!
F22 vs baloon china,su27 vs MQ reaper
Good one
I think the Rules of Engagment - No use of weapons in Intertational Waters so this was the only way the Russian could take out the Drone.
But a few years back On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.
Russia run out of jets due to sanctions last year, that was a Sukhoi Shovel vs Drone.
what we saw in the news the Rules of Engagment - No weapons in Intertational Waters so this was the only way the Russian could take out the Drone.
But a few years back On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.
Господи, какая сказка 🤣Сами придумали, сами поверили.Пилот вообще-то, сбил беспилотник сапёрной лапатой.
Meanwhile US uses F22 Raptor and a Sidewinder missile to shoot down some balloon LMAO
Clearly, Russian are fearless ,no matter what they are dealing with.
AAAA why the heck they didnt use the cannon.... may be hard to aim, but godddawn to hit the propeller with the wingtip seems way harder
Rules of Engagment - No weapons in Intertational Waters
Scenario 2: the SU27 was tryin to tip the drone's wing
Spitfire pilot in 1944: first time?
Yes 👍
Some sidewinders on Reaper drone could be useful next time 😅
Well the Russian pilot did a good job to down a spy drone 👍😹😹😹
Too bad MQ 9Reaper need to be more sturdier
Russian jet don't need missile they just need enough oil
Сухой сбил его топливом ))
it was the jet fuel that damaged the drone... at that speed, the jet fuel is like a bag of cement
It was the russian superman who knocked out the drone😂😂😂
what we saw in the news the Rules of Engagment - No weapons in Intertational Waters so this was the only way the Russian could take out the Drone.
But a few years back On June 20, 2019, Iran's integrated system of Air Defense Forces shot down a United States RQ-4A Global Hawk BAMS-D surveillance drone with a surface-to-air missile over the Strait of Hormuz.
I do not understand if su27 hit the propeler of drone then how come they remain safe and landed without damage
In the original video propeller seems melted after attack. So it wasn't a crash for sure.
Таран-оружие героев!
Thanks for animation, very interesting
It's also used by Ethiopia 🇪🇹
Ok
american cant digest this fact that russian fighter landed safely....
India not uses Sukhoi-27, India uses Sukhoi-30MKI..
Are you Sure?
Does India Use Mig 29?
@@Aitelly yes, India uses mig- 29..
Well presented