idk considering how many times shes said "You only have to prove that it was more likely than not" you'd think the plaintiff would have been awarded for damages. considering that the place was so bad it was literally deemed uninhabitable, it wouldn't be a stretch to assume any mattresses in there would get damaged.
I don’t agree with the way that JM seemed to be dismissing and diminishing the plaintiff’s experience. She keeps saying *”You got to live there rent-free”* but she’s ignoring the fact that the man says he had bedbugs, roaches, heating issues, water issues, etc. Would SHE consider living anywhere under those circumstances to be fully compensable by not paying rent, and therefore, she need not complain? Also, if the place was actually found to have bedbugs, then *of course* he would have gotten rid of some items…I know I would have, and since he didn’t have proof of the actual amount of loss, she should’ve done a bit of a that “rough justice”, and awarded him *something!* Preponderance of evidence? 🤷🏽♀️
Judge Milian explained in the "After the Verdict" segment with her husband that he was given an award by not having to pay rent elsewhere. He had a choice, move out earlier into an apartment that was not infested and pay rent, or stay where it was inhabitable for 5 months and not pay rent. He made his choice, so he already benefitted.
JM was having a really bad day. Living in a place for 3 months with no heat and no cold water is ridiculous. He was willing to pay her as long as she fixed the issues. He wasn't getting over on anyone. And the judge should know plenty about bedbugs and how hard it is to get rid of them. I wouldn't have taken the furniture either. She was just upset about something else and showed her emotions through this case.
Because he had no proof of his damaged furniture, it was explained that his "compensation" was the fact he didn't pay rent while staying at the place FOR MONTHS. Yes the place was gross AF, but he *stayed there*. Having to ditch his furniture was the price he paid for - ideally - saving up money that would have gone to rent. Did you not watch the ending where she discussed the case with her husband??
There was literally no proof of bedbugs or fleas and no proof anything was damaged or discarded and judges deal in proof. It was already explained in the case.
He was rude as all get out trying to railroad the judge and speak over her. He wouldn't even answer her questions. She doesn't need the filler, yes or no and move on.
Smh 😔 so disappointed with the judge for the way he handle this. The guy had a video of the flees like wtf if the previous judge deemed it uninhabitable then how tf you don't think that his stuff will be ruined.
The disgusting defendant literally had that man living in a rundown barely habitable shack because she knew it was what he could afford. She didn’t care about anything, and the judge clearly found the place uninhabitable. The Plaintiff should’ve got the security, but also the fees. Milian can be so tight on the People’s Court wallet sometimes. Also, they really need to get back into the courtroom. They can barely hear each other and the delay makes it hard for them to communicate without talking over each other. That’s getting annoying quickly, not just to them, but also to us watching them interrupt each other.
Yes and the judge never seems to comprehend or take into consideration the fact that there will be lagging or a delay in the connection but yet she always seem to say “ok stop talking!” She sure is moody half the time.
It makes me curious if she feels like she needs to be a bit more like JJ now that her long running show has ended. I also agree about getting back in the courtroom. The restrictions have been lifted in most places and lots of other live shows have started back up. I always think it’s weird when she gets snappy with them because I live where there’s bad internet and phone connections and know how delays and cutting out can happen.
I agree. And by looking at the landlords appearance w the hair towel on her head shows she has an "I don't care attitude" because even though it's on the remote system, it's still court & that isn't court appropriate. Plus the background of wherever she's online, is terrible. She knows she's a slum lord. And the Judge knew it was unlivable so she should know his belongings would be unusable. He was only asking for $400, she should've given him that.
She does! She'll ask a question then inurrupt w another question before they answer. Anyone else noticed she's been super rude lately ...usually unprovoked
It irks me when she always ask them questions and then will rudely interrupt them and say please stop talking but gets mad when they start talking while she has interrupted them
I'd bet anyone 100$ that Judge Milian wouldn't dare leave her mattress in that apartment overnight yet she said this plaintiff had no proof for damages lol.
@@hillaryconsultingservices Iwas just about to say this. Judge Millian has shown a few times how nasty she might be. First, she expected the lady to wash white towels she used to clean sewage back up in her bathroom (no compensation), then she couldn't understand why a man would leave his property from a flea infestation and refused to compensate him, and then there was another case that had me confused. I would never eat her food at the company pot-luck!!!
The plaintiff is a youth development specialist in Syracuse NY. He was on the show another time. I think it was regarding a used car sale. I remember him, but not the case. It will come to me. In this case, Marilyn was very rude to him. No surprise there.
They really need to get back to doing the cases live. Trying to do them over video-conference creates a delay, and issues with communication. They’re talking over each other, not knowing when to stop, and not knowing when to answer because of the delay from the webcam and the fact that they aren’t in the same and can’t see other live. I mean it’s cool, but it’s kinda contributing to making the communication messy and more abrasive than it needs to be.
Douglas needs to be there to turn on / off the lights. Rumor has it Doug was using the empty court house to sell his Rolecks watches and Lewy Viton bags.
Everyone is mad at the judge for not awarding the case to the Plaintiff; but he had no physical proof of the damages to his furniture Edit: and the judge explained all the way at the end that because the guy wasn't paying rent while still living in the gross apartment - THAT'S his compensation
The judge is so disrespectful to the plaintiff, she accuses him of talking over her, but in fact she keeps shouting over him, and where does she get off accusing him of living there 'rent free' when the place was infested and considered 'uninhabitable by the courts. And it goes without saying that when a place is 'infested' you throw all bedding away, would the judge use her same bedding after it has been infested. I'm sure if the plaintiff had been a different colour she might have been more understanding and awarded him damages...
She's constantly being rude and disrespectful to only certain people and it's just ridiculous! She cuts people off and does not listen! JM used to be a good Judge!🤦🏾♀️🤔
I see many comments slamming the judge for not letting the litigants finish sentences...come on now, the judge is asking direct questions and the litigants keep talking like they don't hear her....is it a technical issue or just both of them trying to lay out as much information even though the judge doesn't need to hear it?
I think those complainers don’t understand how court or life work. Someone in a leadership position asks for information and you are supposed to give that information, not talk about what you want or give the speech you practiced. Plus, I think there may be some unconscious bias in these complainers.
@@mercedeshughes3350 She interrupts when people ramble on and do not answer a question she posed to them. She interrupts with the original question. Re-watch this episode and watch a few more. You’ll see.
Plaintiff says that he had to have someone at his place 24/7 because there were no locks. Then he said the handyman felt uncomfortable working at his apartment when no one was there. What happened to whoever was sitting there in place of installing a lock?
I noticed that too. Im sorry but I couldn't be in an apartment w/o a door lock. I would've went to the hardware store on day 1 to buy a door knob w a lock & went back to install it myself then saved the receipt days her to refund me.
I thought the way he came up with that “I guess the handyman was scared” line was kinda convenient for him especially given he gave the handyman specific orders to come in anyway while he was away.
These zoom cases frustrate me. Not because of quality of the video or anything like that. Thank u for the uploads. Over the computer there can be a delay. So it may take the plantiff and defendant an extra second to even hear a question or hear that the judge started talking. Then she is telling them to stop talking. Then just a bunch of her yelling stop talking and them still talking
That's why i always ask about bug's before moving in even if the place had bugs year's before but clean now i still wouldn't move in I have a huge phobia to roaches and don't take any chances once they're in those walls they're there forever no matter how many times you exterminate
I've been renting for 15 years. Dealt with a roach problem once; I'm forever phobic "lol" - the landlord wasn't doing sh*t, the exterminator barely helped, so I bought construction foam and filled EVERY space and crack... Never saw a roach again for the rest of the lease
Judge MM was very frustrated. BUT, I get it...Most times, either party will NOT answer the question asked. They give an entire dissertation without answering the question.
Agreed. In Syracuse, you can kill people by shutting off heat in winter. I lived there for years. It's definitely illegal to shut off anyone's heat for any reason.
It's wild to me she states he was ordered out by a judge. He was *allowed* out because it was uninhabitable. They were both annoying with how they wanted to stick to their stories instead of just answering questions, but judge really didn't handle this properly imo. She was pretty rude. I don't understand why she wouldn't award him for his things, either. Bedbugs alone are a nightmare to get rid of, plus fleas?? Some people throw away all of their furniture after dealing with bedbugs for a while.
Neither one of these people could answer a straight question. Every answer he gave started off with "ok so" and then he proceeds to give her more background instead of answering. The defendant was no better, she kept just trying to get her story out as well instead of answering.
JM wasn't "meaner" to the plaintiff any more than the defendant. She wasn't on her period, y'all. 🙄 She just hungry. Bet this case was right before lunch.
When someone asks you a question, just give them the answer and ONLY the answer. The plaintiff tries to complain about something and then talks about 4 or 5 unrelated things. She's trying to drive the train in a straight line and doesn't need to be clouded with a bunch of useless information. She'll get to it when she gets to it
So if an adult chooses to live somewhere that not habitable they don't have to pay what they agreed to?? That's not right. They should get 5 days to get out or pay rent.
They both are liars. One big hole in the plaintiff's testimony.... How did he testify first thing saying that the place had no locks and that he had to have someone there 24/7, then he used the excuse that the handyman was unable to fix anything because "he's a working man" and no one was there to let the handyman in everytime he came by..... uuuuhhhh, which one is it??
If the renter/court says a place is uninhabitable then the tenant should have to be out in 5 days. Not a month or more. If it was so bad why did he not move immediately???? No he didn't pay rent for 6 months and that's ok? No. She should have gotten rent since he stayed and lived there. Ridiculous tenants know what and how to play the system
I feel that the judge was racist in how she treated the plaintiff. No one else will say it but I will. She had no excuse repeatedly interrupting and yelling. In addition, she has done enough of these cases that even given she is privileged she should know by now that bed bugs ruin mattresses. Very disappointed in her.
All yall babies in the comments complaining but still watching lmfao make it make sense yall complain about judge Judy too but still watch 😂😂😂😂 i love it
"that's a problem for you and that's why u lost your case." this shade is called "no shame shade." it's obvious and in yo face like a late 80s tyson uppercut.
I hate this new format!! It was already bad with the litigants on the screens but I got used to it. Now Milian is on the screen?? She broke her foot so wonder if that’s why
This isn't the new format. These are old episodes. This is how they were doing cases when COVID first started. They're just uploading them to UA-cam now.
Yall forget roaches are common pests depending where you live, it doesnt make it inhabitable or slummy.. #1 , #2 bedbugs can legit come from anywhere places like NYC have them even in bougie hotels, too many damn buildings and ppl in one area i guess. So you can’t claim damages on that.
Now he just said he has to have someone there 24 hours a day so strangers can’t get into the house but when the maintenance people came he was working lol What happened to the 24 hour person?
WOW! IF i ever stopped paying rent, i'd sure remember when i stopped paying it!! That vid was WAY too fast. I didn't see any fleas there! WOW! if i ended up in landlord tenant court, i'd sure remember THAT day as well
Hmm well he's getting the 800 and I get she would've given him the 400 if he had photos or sum kind of proof of wat was damaged. Reading these comments fig it'd have been her going off on him but. Really just seemed like her being her and was trying to get to the point only time she really got upset was when he was over talking her. And she even said he kept his money he would've spent on rent so yeah I understand her judgement on that.
Dude is Disgusting I would’ve moved out if there was an infestation. Breaking the lease would’ve been on the landlord if there was ample time given and still didn’t fix the issue.
Damn she was in a mood!!! The Plaintiff handled himself very well 👏🏼
I admire the plaintiff’s patience 🙏🙌
idk considering how many times shes said "You only have to prove that it was more likely than not" you'd think the plaintiff would have been awarded for damages. considering that the place was so bad it was literally deemed uninhabitable, it wouldn't be a stretch to assume any mattresses in there would get damaged.
She wasn't on her game today at all... she really upset me on this trial
Couldn’t agree more 💯
He was compensated because he didn’t pay rent 2 months
He should've took pics of the beds he had to throw out. The judge needed proof.
@@Pinkdiamond12 i dont think you read or understand what i said lol
I don’t agree with the way that JM seemed to be dismissing and diminishing the plaintiff’s experience. She keeps saying *”You got to live there rent-free”* but she’s ignoring the fact that the man says he had bedbugs, roaches, heating issues, water issues, etc. Would SHE consider living anywhere under those circumstances to be fully compensable by not paying rent, and therefore, she need not complain? Also, if the place was actually found to have bedbugs, then *of course* he would have gotten rid of some items…I know I would have, and since he didn’t have proof of the actual amount of loss, she should’ve done a bit of a that “rough justice”, and awarded him *something!* Preponderance of evidence? 🤷🏽♀️
He literally wouldn't let her fix things despite it supposedly being an emergency (no heat) so he ruined his own chances.
She’s a landlord herself so sometimes in these cases, I’m not even shocked.
Judge Milian explained in the "After the Verdict" segment with her husband that he was given an award by not having to pay rent elsewhere. He had a choice, move out earlier into an apartment that was not infested and pay rent, or stay where it was inhabitable for 5 months and not pay rent. He made his choice, so he already benefitted.
She explained it in the after the verdict segment.
It's simple move somewhere different
Its weird that only Douglas is in the court room with 3 monitors 😂
He stays ready! 😂
JM was having a really bad day. Living in a place for 3 months with no heat and no cold water is ridiculous. He was willing to pay her as long as she fixed the issues. He wasn't getting over on anyone. And the judge should know plenty about bedbugs and how hard it is to get rid of them. I wouldn't have taken the furniture either. She was just upset about something else and showed her emotions through this case.
Because he had no proof of his damaged furniture, it was explained that his "compensation" was the fact he didn't pay rent while staying at the place FOR MONTHS.
Yes the place was gross AF, but he *stayed there*. Having to ditch his furniture was the price he paid for - ideally - saving up money that would have gone to rent.
Did you not watch the ending where she discussed the case with her husband??
There was literally no proof of bedbugs or fleas and no proof anything was damaged or discarded and judges deal in proof. It was already explained in the case.
This was weird the judge was annoying. She kept cutting him off and was just so rude. Landlord was a slumlord
He was rude as all get out trying to railroad the judge and speak over her. He wouldn't even answer her questions. She doesn't need the filler, yes or no and move on.
@@danaspetrini8338 thank you!!! Those where simple yes or no, positive or negative, 1 for yes 2 for no questions. He was annoying
I think there was lag honestly
@@Shaquitra1 That's what I was thinking too! I've seen the lag in several other virtual PC cases.
I agree.
Smh 😔 so disappointed with the judge for the way he handle this. The guy had a video of the flees like wtf if the previous judge deemed it uninhabitable then how tf you don't think that his stuff will be ruined.
The disgusting defendant literally had that man living in a rundown barely habitable shack because she knew it was what he could afford. She didn’t care about anything, and the judge clearly found the place uninhabitable. The Plaintiff should’ve got the security, but also the fees. Milian can be so tight on the People’s Court wallet sometimes. Also, they really need to get back into the courtroom. They can barely hear each other and the delay makes it hard for them to communicate without talking over each other. That’s getting annoying quickly, not just to them, but also to us watching them interrupt each other.
Yes and the judge never seems to comprehend or take into consideration the fact that there will be lagging or a delay in the connection but yet she always seem to say “ok stop talking!” She sure is moody half the time.
It makes me curious if she feels like she needs to be a bit more like JJ now that her long running show has ended. I also agree about getting back in the courtroom. The restrictions have been lifted in most places and lots of other live shows have started back up. I always think it’s weird when she gets snappy with them because I live where there’s bad internet and phone connections and know how delays and cutting out can happen.
I agree. And by looking at the landlords appearance w the hair towel on her head shows she has an "I don't care attitude" because even though it's on the remote system, it's still court & that isn't court appropriate. Plus the background of wherever she's online, is terrible. She knows she's a slum lord. And the Judge knew it was unlivable so she should know his belongings would be unusable. He was only asking for $400, she should've given him that.
This was filmed during the worst of the covid in 2020 and 2021 and 2022.
Do not like place-move
She kills me interrupting the litigants as they are trying to finish a sentence.
Glad to know I'm never alone 😆😆🤣🤣 arrogance oozing all over the place!
First: she’s the judge. Second: see first statement. Third: she doesn’t have time for them to ramble on things she didn’t ask.
She does! She'll ask a question then inurrupt w another question before they answer. Anyone else noticed she's been super rude lately ...usually unprovoked
Omg yes! And then she has the nerve to get mad when they do it to her!
And she do it all the time she'll ask a question then interrupt why ask a question if she already know the answer to it well she think she does
It irks me when she always ask them questions and then will rudely interrupt them and say please stop talking but gets mad when they start talking while she has interrupted them
Yes!!!!!!
He stays ready! 😂
Judge Milan is incredible rude and loud for no reason. I guess she thinks she's talking to her kids
I'd bet anyone 100$ that Judge Milian wouldn't dare leave her mattress in that apartment overnight yet she said this plaintiff had no proof for damages lol.
She expected black lady to keep towels used for sewage backup.
@@hillaryconsultingservices I was *JUST* about to bring up that very same case! She is ridiculous.
Photos he could take photos
@@hillaryconsultingservices Iwas just about to say this. Judge Millian has shown a few times how nasty she might be. First, she expected the lady to wash white towels she used to clean sewage back up in her bathroom (no compensation), then she couldn't understand why a man would leave his property from a flea infestation and refused to compensate him, and then there was another case that had me confused. I would never eat her food at the company pot-luck!!!
her first question to him " when did you stop paying rent" .. she's never asked that as a first question. she started off rude. I wonder why
Where is the rule that she must ask the same first question mark every time?
Can’t wait for everyone to be back in the courtroom!
Why was she being so rude to the plaintiff. It seems like she just didn’t like him.
The plaintiff is a youth development specialist in Syracuse NY. He was on the show another time. I think it was regarding a used car sale. I remember him, but not the case. It will come to me. In this case, Marilyn was very rude to him. No surprise there.
They really need to get back to doing the cases live. Trying to do them over video-conference creates a delay, and issues with communication. They’re talking over each other, not knowing when to stop, and not knowing when to answer because of the delay from the webcam and the fact that they aren’t in the same and can’t see other live. I mean it’s cool, but it’s kinda contributing to making the communication messy and more abrasive than it needs to be.
Yes! And she yells at them to stop talking, but the delay makes it so that they don't know she's talking yet!
They stopped that and the show is over
These virtual shows are annoying. She acts like she doesn’t know there’s a lag and she doesn’t stop interrupting.
I'll say this for every one of these COVID episodes......poor Douglas is all alone 🥺
I don't understand why he's there. If the judge isn't there and no ppl who's to protect or pass papers to and from lol
@@TheDirtydee118 I agree. But, if he's not there, he's not getting paid. It seems silly, but at least he still has a job.
@@TheDirtydee118 he's there so things feel "more real".
Imagine how silly it would be if Douglas tuned in on a monitor 😅
Strange format 3 tv screens talking to each other in an empty room except for Douglas 😮
Very strange! Don’t like it
This case is from 2020. The new season starts Monday. Everyone is back in the courtroom. There will be no gallery of people though.
Douglas needs to be there to turn on / off the lights. Rumor has it Doug was using the empty court house to sell his Rolecks watches and Lewy Viton bags.
Question: WHY is this so strange when this is what was going on during the PANDEMIC and they made a plan so WE could keep watching court cases? 🤔
He was so sweet, patient and respectful the judge must’ve been dealing with menopause that day she was rude as hell for no reason at all I mean damn
SHITTY LIFE TIPS FROM MONET: Every time a women wants a direct answer = menopause
Glad the plaintiff won !!!
The defendant PURPOSELY tried to deceive the court but Milian had more smoke for the plaintiff. 😐
Straight facts.. it annoyed me... she can be so elitist at times...
I rolled my eyes when she was trying to make him feel bad for withholding the rent for three months
Drove me nuts how she would ask him a question but then talk right over him while he was trying to answer it!
Cuz the judge is a landlord to their like cops they got the "rent wall" landlords united and s#!+
Everyone is mad at the judge for not awarding the case to the Plaintiff; but he had no physical proof of the damages to his furniture
Edit: and the judge explained all the way at the end that because the guy wasn't paying rent while still living in the gross apartment - THAT'S his compensation
She was not in the mood as said as she said thank you Douglas...
The plaintiff was so patient with the judge. She is so ridiculously rude
nope, the judge was not rude at all.
The judge is so disrespectful to the plaintiff, she accuses him of talking over her, but in fact she keeps shouting over him, and where does she get off accusing him of living there 'rent free' when the place was infested and considered 'uninhabitable by the courts.
And it goes without saying that when a place is 'infested' you throw all bedding away, would the judge use her same bedding after it has been infested. I'm sure if the plaintiff had been a different colour she might have been more understanding and awarded him damages...
She's constantly being rude and disrespectful to only certain people and it's just ridiculous! She cuts people off and does not listen! JM used to be a good Judge!🤦🏾♀️🤔
I see many comments slamming the judge for not letting the litigants finish sentences...come on now, the judge is asking direct questions and the litigants keep talking like they don't hear her....is it a technical issue or just both of them trying to lay out as much information even though the judge doesn't need to hear it?
I think those complainers don’t understand how court or life work. Someone in a leadership position asks for information and you are supposed to give that information, not talk about what you want or give the speech you practiced. Plus, I think there may be some unconscious bias in these complainers.
she IS asking those direct questions whilst they are speaking tho.
@@mercedeshughes3350 She interrupts when people ramble on and do not answer a question she posed to them. She interrupts with the original question. Re-watch this episode and watch a few more. You’ll see.
Plaintiff says that he had to have someone at his place 24/7 because there were no locks. Then he said the handyman felt uncomfortable working at his apartment when no one was there. What happened to whoever was sitting there in place of installing a lock?
I didn't even notice that slip up there lol. Surprised the judge didn't either.
I noticed that too. Im sorry but I couldn't be in an apartment w/o a door lock. I would've went to the hardware store on day 1 to buy a door knob w a lock & went back to install it myself then saved the receipt days her to refund me.
Yes, when I heard that, I was like...WHAT...You just said that somebody always had to be there, due to no locks on the doors. 🤔
I thought the way he came up with that “I guess the handyman was scared” line was kinda convenient for him especially given he gave the handyman specific orders to come in anyway while he was away.
The judge was extra rude in this case.
These zoom cases frustrate me. Not because of quality of the video or anything like that. Thank u for the uploads. Over the computer there can be a delay. So it may take the plantiff and defendant an extra second to even hear a question or hear that the judge started talking. Then she is telling them to stop talking. Then just a bunch of her yelling stop talking and them still talking
That's why i always ask about bug's before moving in even if the place had bugs year's before but clean now i still wouldn't move in I have a huge phobia to roaches and don't take any chances once they're in those walls they're there forever no matter how many times you exterminate
I've been renting for 15 years. Dealt with a roach problem once; I'm forever phobic "lol"
- the landlord wasn't doing sh*t, the exterminator barely helped, so I bought construction foam and filled EVERY space and crack... Never saw a roach again for the rest of the lease
Cannot stop laughing 😆😅🤣😂🤣🤣🤣this landlord-woman looks like she is wearing a hat with ears 🐰
Judge MM was very frustrated. BUT, I get it...Most times, either party will NOT answer the question asked. They give an entire dissertation without answering the question.
Never complained before about the judge being rude as I normally like her feistiness, but she wouldn't let the guy finish a sentence!!
She can't shut off the Heat period!
Whether he legitimately had rent in Escrow or was just not paying
Agreed. In Syracuse, you can kill people by shutting off heat in winter. I lived there for years. It's definitely illegal to shut off anyone's heat for any reason.
She can and it is by law at the time....
@@trekgirl65
No you can't.
Its been that way for Decades
Watch Pacific Heights film 1990
Wow this was stressful
That house definitely ain't worth 1200 WTF
Not me trying to figure out his Funko pops 😅
Since he didn't technically sue for his stuff he probably still can.
Great point
Unfortunately all too common too have flawed crazy and greedy landlords.Out of seven landlords lve had in my lifetime only two were decent people.
If a judge asks what time is it, don't tell the judge how to fix a clock.
It's wild to me she states he was ordered out by a judge. He was *allowed* out because it was uninhabitable. They were both annoying with how they wanted to stick to their stories instead of just answering questions, but judge really didn't handle this properly imo. She was pretty rude. I don't understand why she wouldn't award him for his things, either. Bedbugs alone are a nightmare to get rid of, plus fleas?? Some people throw away all of their furniture after dealing with bedbugs for a while.
Neither one of these people could answer a straight question. Every answer he gave started off with "ok so" and then he proceeds to give her more background instead of answering. The defendant was no better, she kept just trying to get her story out as well instead of answering.
JM wasn't "meaner" to the plaintiff any more than the defendant. She wasn't on her period, y'all. 🙄 She just hungry. Bet this case was right before lunch.
He literally could have moved with the rent he withheld he didn't have to stay in an infested unit.
If it was infestation why wouldn’t he get damages for furniture sorry but JM was extremely rude to the plaintiff!
GREEDY LADY, TRYING TO SNEAK AND GET MONEY ANY WAY 😂😂😂😂
I thought he had to have someone there 24/7! So why would no one be there for the repair man?
JM’s head bow 😂
When someone asks you a question, just give them the answer and ONLY the answer. The plaintiff tries to complain about something and then talks about 4 or 5 unrelated things. She's trying to drive the train in a straight line and doesn't need to be clouded with a bunch of useless information. She'll get to it when she gets to it
So if an adult chooses to live somewhere that not habitable they don't have to pay what they agreed to?? That's not right. They should get 5 days to get out or pay rent.
The uneven scale in AFTER THE VERDICT still annoys me!
Why are the interviewer guys at the end always trying to throw shade? 😂
JM is annoying I can’t with her, he should of went to Judge Mathis.
Now if he REALLY didn't have heat.....you'd think he'd let them in immediately... Since he lives in Syracuse
They both are liars. One big hole in the plaintiff's testimony.... How did he testify first thing saying that the place had no locks and that he had to have someone there 24/7, then he used the excuse that the handyman was unable to fix anything because "he's a working man" and no one was there to let the handyman in everytime he came by..... uuuuhhhh, which one is it??
Does defendant have a head wound or is that a fashion choice?
If the renter/court says a place is uninhabitable then the tenant should have to be out in 5 days. Not a month or more. If it was so bad why did he not move immediately???? No he didn't pay rent for 6 months and that's ok? No. She should have gotten rent since he stayed and lived there. Ridiculous tenants know what and how to play the system
I live for this show LOL
Dont forget the comment section, its golden.
you can’t hold rent ransom for ANY reason.
Then move out... I dislike people like the plaintiff; if it's that horrible then leave... She's not forcing you to stay!
What is on the defendants head?
Crazy door 99
Hex yeah zoom court!!!
Disorganized woman! Annoying tenant!
Not sure if it's the computers or the people, but they need a new format bc this is exhausting to watch.
I feel that the judge was racist in how she treated the plaintiff. No one else will say it but I will. She had no excuse repeatedly interrupting and yelling. In addition, she has done enough of these cases that even given she is privileged she should know by now that bed bugs ruin mattresses. Very disappointed in her.
SRB
you can't afford to live / that simple / here come a car
the judge has been so rude lately .. it’s not fun to watch when she’s just being unnecessarily rude.
All yall babies in the comments complaining but still watching lmfao make it make sense yall complain about judge Judy too but still watch 😂😂😂😂 i love it
Wow this seemed so out of character for the judge she's usually right on
"that's a problem for you and that's why u lost your case." this shade is called "no shame shade." it's obvious and in yo face like a late 80s tyson uppercut.
This guy is the problem he is the reason why he is the definition
Can Douglas share his anti-aging secrets? 😀
dude learn to shut up. i hate people that have to keep talking. this is why i like in person court.
It maybe time for JM to retire. Her nerves are getting bad. I can’t watch the show hardly
Is she wearing a Santa cap?
I don’t think they’re purposely talking over each other. There may be a delay because it’s all video
I hate this new format!! It was already bad with the litigants on the screens but I got used to it. Now Milian is on the screen?? She broke her foot so wonder if that’s why
It’s old from 2020
This isn't the new format. These are old episodes. This is how they were doing cases when COVID first started. They're just uploading them to UA-cam now.
They should be filming a new season right now!
He answered the picture issue 3 times.
Yall forget roaches are common pests depending where you live, it doesnt make it inhabitable or slummy.. #1 , #2 bedbugs can legit come from anywhere places like NYC have them even in bougie hotels, too many damn buildings and ppl in one area i guess. So you can’t claim damages on that.
The place looked like a dump.
Now he just said he has to have someone there 24 hours a day so strangers can’t get into the house but when the maintenance people came he was working lol What happened to the 24 hour person?
No biggie, she gets to keep his money and the show pays the judgement. TV justice!
Really? How do you know that?
@@terrybingham9524 That's how these shows work. Each party is paid an amount to be on the show and the verdict is paid out by the show as well.
I’m not saying you’re wrong I’m just looking for something other than you saying it. I find this very interesting.
Crazy money 91
It’s SOOOOOOO annoying when people don’t listen to Judge Millian. Just shut up for a second and listen to her question 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
Good ruling for the plantiff. Justice was served in this case.
You are starting to see JM's true colors! Good job!!!
The case of chatter box vs clueless
Why does she ask questions and interrupt answers within 2 seconds? If I wanted to watch this, I'd watch Judy (The best in the interruption biz).
He sounds like wah wah wah wah like Charlie brown teacher😴
🙄 The judge deemed he didn’t have to pay rent so why are you upset.
I don’t feel like she being rude JM is asking specific question and they information dump instead of answering the direct question at hand
Gentle boy 73
Judge gotta keep em on track
WOW! IF i ever stopped paying rent, i'd sure remember when i stopped paying it!! That vid was WAY too fast. I didn't see any fleas there! WOW! if i ended up in landlord tenant court, i'd sure remember THAT day as well
Hmm well he's getting the 800 and I get she would've given him the 400 if he had photos or sum kind of proof of wat was damaged. Reading these comments fig it'd have been her going off on him but. Really just seemed like her being her and was trying to get to the point only time she really got upset was when he was over talking her. And she even said he kept his money he would've spent on rent so yeah I understand her judgement on that.
Dude is Disgusting I would’ve moved out if there was an infestation. Breaking the lease would’ve been on the landlord if there was ample time given and still didn’t fix the issue.
Menopause will do that