Newton Goes Prime Time (bonus footage with Steven Strogatz) - Numberphile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 49

  • @bossaddict08
    @bossaddict08 5 років тому +72

    Oh my gosh, Mr. Strogatz’s excitement is heart warming.

  • @ruinenlust_
    @ruinenlust_ 5 років тому +52

    I _FEEL_ Steven Strogatz' excitement!!

  • @13thloona
    @13thloona 5 років тому +50

    Newton: it is my belief I invented calculus and here are my proofs
    Jury (also Newton): oh my you're correct
    Judge (also Newton): say no more

  • @Semtx552
    @Semtx552 5 років тому +6

    This is such a great formula, showing professors the crown jewels of their field. Could be a series on itself. I’d love it!

  • @Nimasho2go
    @Nimasho2go 5 років тому +13

    It is so cool to watch people getting extremely excited about things. I would certainly get enamored by the experience of seeing the manuscript, but to someone like Mr. (Dr. ?) Strogatz who has based a large part of his life on the things first published in that book, it must have been an amazing experience for him.

    • @Headhunter_212
      @Headhunter_212 5 років тому

      Nim plays you should check out Brady’s Objecivity YT channel.

    • @stevenstrogatz1
      @stevenstrogatz1 3 роки тому +1

      It WAS an amazing experience!!

  • @Depressed_Dinosaur
    @Depressed_Dinosaur 5 років тому +9

    Brady, objectivity fans would love to hear about this as well. Newton + Keith + Calculus = fun!

    • @xGaLoSx
      @xGaLoSx 5 років тому

      Agreed, I clicked by chance without knowing Keith was in it, objectivity would love this.

  • @walkingwriter4325
    @walkingwriter4325 5 років тому +8

    I'm surprised that they're not wearing gloves when touching the pages of these manuscripts. And will historians a few hundred years from now have anything to hold and look at with wonder from our time as everything is going to digital format? At least Brady will have all that brown paper from his episodes to preserve for posterity!

  • @hardrocklobsterroll395
    @hardrocklobsterroll395 5 років тому +13

    Yes! I was so excited for this podcast! STEVE IS SO CUTE OMG

  • @PetrFlosman
    @PetrFlosman 5 років тому +1

    Numberphile podcast is a masterpiece I tell you! It’s really like a diamond in the world of podcasting.

  • @StreuB1
    @StreuB1 5 років тому +5

    This was absolutely STUNNING!!! Professor Strogatz excitement and intensity is unreal. He is the real deal. As a calculus student myself, this was amazing and addicting to experience.

  • @xGaLoSx
    @xGaLoSx 5 років тому +1

    KEITH!!!!!!! why is he not in the title? Fucking legend.

  • @CaptainMarvel4Ever
    @CaptainMarvel4Ever 5 років тому +3

    how funny, I just finished the podcast as I got back from work and here's the bonus footage.

  • @rrand1
    @rrand1 5 років тому +10

    Newton's interest in infinite series looks forward to the current tool for solving differential equations by using perturbation methods.

  • @NoriMori1992
    @NoriMori1992 5 років тому +1

    3:32 Here come the waterworks! I love Steven, he's so endearing ❤

  • @mrnarason
    @mrnarason 5 років тому +6

    Professor Strogatz fanboying lol! Crazy how recognizable notation is even after almost 500 years.

  • @rossmillington8700
    @rossmillington8700 5 років тому +1

    Wonderful podcast, wonderful video, wonderful guy

  • @wennarhys8582
    @wennarhys8582 5 років тому +1

    just astounding

  • @1996Pinocchio
    @1996Pinocchio 5 років тому +1

    These books are so fascinating.

  • @imetr8r
    @imetr8r 9 місяців тому +1

    Why arn't these people using gloves to handle these priceless documents!

  • @fly7188
    @fly7188 2 роки тому

    I think Newton wasn't too worried about sharing his work because he was so enraptured by his recent findings, I can imagine stumbling into the magic of calculus and not thinking of much else.
    Even as a student of mathematics hundreds of years later I am still quite taken by the wonder of it all and I can only imagine what it must of been like for Sir Isaac

    • @whitb62
      @whitb62 11 місяців тому

      I don’t think this is actually accurate. All the historical evidence shows how very peculiar Newton was and the amount of time he spent on different subjects. Mathematics and physics were very far down the list. Most of his time and private writings were dedicated to other intellectual pursuits such as alchemy and mostly biblical prophecy.

  • @ChandrasegaranNarasimhan
    @ChandrasegaranNarasimhan 10 місяців тому

    It is interesting that you mention he is using summations. Negative binomial is summation. So no surprise he invented it. First step in derivative is binomial expansion.

  • @PaoloDonadeo
    @PaoloDonadeo 5 років тому +1

    This video is wonderful and still the funniest part of it is the 6 "dislikes", in the moment I'm writing.

  • @JavierSalcedoC
    @JavierSalcedoC 5 років тому +4

    0:20 - 0:27 Kiss without makeup

  • @topilinkala1594
    @topilinkala1594 Рік тому

    Newton dabled with spectra but new bothered to look it through a magnifying glass. So how curiouous was he?

  • @-fitzy-3335
    @-fitzy-3335 5 років тому +4

    Prime time 😏

  • @cleon_teunissen
    @cleon_teunissen 5 років тому +1

    As to why Newton didn't initially submit his work to the Royal Society. Keith offered the possibility that was mainly Newton being adverse to conflict. Inevitably there would be pushback, including pushback from men with a lower level of understanding, which Newton would be loathe to deal with.
    There is a problem with that suggestion, and the evidence for that is at the very start of the video. By the time Newton was president of the Royal Society Newton conducted an ardent behind-the-curtains campaign to establisch himself as the only developer of Calculus, and opposing the view that Leibniz had independently developed Calculus.
    For Newton's mindset I endorse the view that he was extremely possessive. When talking to fellow scholars Newton could not resist the temptation to demonstrate the extent of his abilities, but at the same time his predominent mindset, it appears, was to think of his discoveries as personal possessions.
    This would explain why later in life Newton would be so vindictive. Even though early in life Newton had not published any of his Calculus, he still went on a campaign agains Leibniz, asserting priority.

  • @patriciapinilla6654
    @patriciapinilla6654 Місяць тому

    It makes me nervous they are not using gloves.

  • @deepshikhachatterjee9146
    @deepshikhachatterjee9146 2 роки тому

    Well calculus was actually discovered 200 years before Newton or Leibniz was even born. This discovery was made in India more precisely in the preasent day state of Kerela by the researchers of the Kerela school of Mathematics at that time. Now don't get me wrong here I am not saying that Newton copied this work by the Indians, no, but what I am saying is that the scientific advancements in ancient India were far more advanced than the scientific advancements of Europe at that time and unfortunately these works are not known by many people these days as compared to the Western works.

  • @reteipdevries
    @reteipdevries 5 років тому

    Wethouder Hekking!

  • @PetraKann
    @PetraKann 5 років тому

    Archimedes was at the beginning of Calculus.

  • @PassionPopsicle
    @PassionPopsicle 5 років тому +1

    Keeeeiiiiith!!!! Ahem

  • @Fourestgump
    @Fourestgump 5 років тому

    😎

  • @TheBlackbirdii
    @TheBlackbirdii 5 років тому

    all smart people had/have long noses ...prove me wrong

  • @robl4836
    @robl4836 5 років тому +1

    I invented Calculus last year. Imagine how gutted I was when I saw this video.

  • @trdi
    @trdi 5 років тому

    Seems like Newton was quite an asshole. I'm also not convinced about him being the "inventor". First of all, Leibniz is without a doubt inventor of the notation. Secondly, I have invented internet, hypersonic weapons and cure for cancer. I am just not choosing to present it to the public. And I'm not even calling Newton a liar. Simply put, if you have any interest in being recognized as an inventor of anything, the most basic concept is to present it to the public. You don't have to be genius to understand that.

  • @thenorup
    @thenorup 5 років тому

    This guy clearly has not read the Principia.
    It is actually a really interesting and fairly easy read, if you have a physics degree.

    • @knaperstekt7953
      @knaperstekt7953 5 років тому +12

      Best case scenario is that is you are a troll. And that case is very bad. Shame on you.

    • @maxwellsequation4887
      @maxwellsequation4887 3 роки тому

      Wtf are u srs? Its such a difficult book to read even for physicists and mathematicians.

    • @thenorup
      @thenorup 3 роки тому

      @@maxwellsequation4887 I should have said "surprisingly easy to read".
      The language is fairly modern, and the subject matter is taught in high school.