In 1985 the Super Bowl were in California won by a Team from California In 2022 the Super Bowl will be in California all i can say watch for the Chargers they and the 49ers are the only teams that never left the state
There are a some that you didn't mention. 1. Mascots similarity in both the winners and losers. Winning teams were the Raiders and Buccaneers. Losing teams were the Redskins and Chiefs. 2. You can also draw some similarities to the previous year's Super Bowl. Washington won Super Bowl 17 by 10 points despite trailing going into the fourth quarter. The Chiefs won Super Bowl 54 by 11 points despite trailing going into the 4th quarter. 3. Both Plunkett and Brady were drafted by the Patriots. Both were raised in the Bay Area.
The parallels between this game and the 83 Redskins are scary. Both the Chiefs and Redskins finished 14-2. Both were Indian themed(Chiefs and Redskins). Both teams played and beat pirate themed teams(Raiders and Buccaneers) in the regular season. Both averaged 30 points a game(Chiefs 29.6 which rounds up to 30)in the regular season. The two pirate teams they beat in the regular season by 2 and 3 points in each game beat them by 30+ points to 9 points(raiders 38 washington 9 and Buccaneers 31 chiefs 9). Both offenses looked unstoppable only to be easily shut down in the super bowl.
I was thinking about this when I was watching the Super Bowl especially with the Native American and Pirate Mascots. Also the first TD in Super Bowl XVIII was blocked punt.
@@deanjo57790 But very different paths. Brady was a nobody coming out of college and had very good success early in the NFL. Plunkett was superstar in college (Heisman) but took a while to find success at the pro level.
If the normal network rotation was followed for this Super Bowl Al Michaels would have called it for NBC. His two Super Bowl calls from Tampa were the iconic SB25 and SB43. Instead CBS covered the game. That makes the scores of their three Super Bowls from Tampa (SB18, SB35, and SB55) 38-9, 34-7, and 31-9.
Another sort-of parallel; the last QB before Brady to win a SB in his 1st season with his new team was Trent Dilfer of the 2000 Baltimore Ravens in SB XXXV, another team with a vaunted defensive unit. And that Super Bowl was played....in Tampa.
Actually, the Raiders had lost a SB before. SB II: Green Bay 33 Oakland 14. I will admit, however, that it wasn't called the "Super Bowl" at the time. Lamar Hunt coined the term a year later. If we ignore the pre-merger era, the Packers would have 2 rings, Chiefs 1, and Jets 0
Kind of hard to ignore the Jets' win. I am not like certain idiots who think SB III brought about the AFL-NFL merger, because that was already agreed upon. But without that victory, I wouldn't be surprised if the merged NFL would have decided to drop the Super Bowl altogether.
@@eddiejc1 Oh no doubt. Namath’s guarantee in SB III will always be remembered. I hope the Jets go back soon. Things can turn around very quickly in this league, see the Bengals.
So on a Monday Night Football Game during November 2023, we should anticipate Mahomes breaking his leg in a gruesome way during a botched Flea Flicker.
Against a star NFC opponent defender picked second overall 5 years prior. 2019's 2nd overall pick was Nick Bosa and with the addition of the 17th game the niners could very well play the chiefs in 2023
I got one for you guys: Superbowl 10, Steelers 21, Cowboys 17 Steelers scoring was a touchdown, a touchdown and missed conversion, two field goals and a safety. Cowboys scoring was two touchdowns and a field goal... Superbowl 36 Giants 21, Patriots 17 Giants scoring was a touchdown, a touchdown and missed conversion, two field goals and a safety. Patriots scoring was two touchdowns and a field goal...
The team names and mascots are similar as well Washington and Kansas city had native American mascots and Los Angeles and Tampa Bay have basically pirate mascots as well
I've already read other comments talking about super bowl 2, but there is one detail you left out regarding the quarterbacks of the winning team. Both Jim Plunkett and Tom Brady were drafted by the patriot's. Not to mention that the losing team in both games have similar mascots.
Also the fact that in super bowl 19 featured a california team in the nfc west winning their second title in franchise history against a quarterback in his second season where as in super bowl 56 featured a california team in the nfc west winning their second title in franchise history against a quarterback in his second season.
The 2020 was eerily similar to the 2002 season 2002: The Buccaneers won the super bowl in blowout fashion against an AFC West team 2020: The Buccaneers won the super bowl in blowout fashion against an AFC West team 2002: The Browns played the Steelers in the wild card round. 2020: The Browns played the Steelers in the wild card round. 2002 was also the last year the Browns made the playoffs before 2020 2002: The Patriots missed the playoffs 2020: The Patriots missed the playoffs 2002: The Broncos beat the Patriots in Foxboro 2020 The Broncos beat the Patriots in Foxboro Let all that sink in for a second.
I kind of find it funny that 100% effort for accuracy of resemblance wasn't achieved in regards to NFL team logos in some of these older network telecasts. I mean, that's Super Bowl XVIII, and the team's logos look like they were designed by a second grader (I also noticed that on the clip promoting the 1980 game between Tampa Bay and the Rams). I'm okay with it in retrospect, but I'm just surprised that the NFL was fine with how their league's helmets were portrayed onscreen (I know that technically every team is individually owned, but no way that something like this could last).
@@ericfitzgerald9214 I don't know though, don't you think the logos could still be a little better, even without digital & 4k, which are relatively new to the medium?
At least one other ditto stat....both winning quarterbacks were in the twilight of their careers, and both started their careers in New England. Also, both winning teams are versions of pirates.
That was great, thanks much. In my 74 years I've never been much of a prognosticator, but I actually predicted that picksix because Theisman had thrown that very pass so many times before. All those similarities I would never have guessed; you have good instincts for this stuff young man.
He even threw it in the regular season game against the Raiders in almost the same situation, but it went for a huge gain. The Raiders expected the play in the Super Bowl.
Not quite. The scores were 31-9 and 38-9 respectively. The only common themes were that the defending champion scored 9 points as high-powered offenses, they were rematches and the location was in Tampa. But I can see the parallels between the two. Fairly accurate otherwise. Good video. Worth a subscription for the effort and detail.
Bob Costas said the same at the have time of the second time the ny gaints faced the new patriots when the score was 9 gaints and 10 patriots . When in the gaints first time went to the super bowl against the broncos the score was 9 gaints and 10 broncos at half time.
And here's another fun fact--guess who Tampa Bay beat in its first Super Bowl appearance to win Super Bowl XXXVII? The Oakland Raiders, formerly...the Los Angeles Raiders, who won Super Bowl XVIII... BTW, what was Reid thinking with those timeouts? You're playing against Tom Brady--an aging Tom Brady, yes, but there's a reason he's one of the best QBs of all time (including several wins against Reid-coached teams), and you're giving him MORE time?!? At least Mahomes wasn't playing against the 1985 Bears defense--he'd need an ambulance, given how hard they hit...
The winning teams wore different shades (Raiders wore dark, Bucs wore light) However they WOULD have matched if TB had worn the unis they were supposed to have. Remember it was an odd numbered year, so the Bucs (NFC) should have worn their dark jerseys.
Should’ve but I think they went with the white jerseys because the trend of teams wearing white jerseys winning the super bowl that dates all the way back to super bowl 33. From that point up to super bowl 56 only 6 teams wearing dark jerseys have won the super bowl. And two of these dark jersey winning teams were quarterbacked by Tom Brady.
Just sayin' ---> one last similarity that some may have overlooked between these two Super Bowls: the winning teams' monikers had to do with pirates(Buccaneers, Raiders); the losing teams' names had to do with American Indians(Redskins, Chiefs). I'll show myself out now...
True but the Raiders are 3-2 in Super Bowls. They lost their second SB which was their last appearance to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 48-21 in San Diego. The pirate bowl! Gruden bowl which Tim Brown said it was sabotage!
2010: Green Bay Packers 2011: New York Giants 2012: Baltimore Ravens 2013: Seattle Seahawks 2014: New England Patriots 2015: Denver Broncos 2016: New England Patriots 2017: Philadelphia Eagles 2018: New England Patriots 2019: Kansas City Chiefs
actually i was thinking that aside from mahomes having already won a super bowl and brady about to win his 7th instead of just his second, this reminded me a lot of super bowl 19
Other similarities Both games aired on CBS. LV was actually NBC’s turn but the two networks swapped games because LVI is happening during the 2022 Winter Games when NBC is televising that event & the major networks have an agreement not to put on any other programing during the game Both games were won by the team that are synonyms for pirate over the team that has issues with portrayals of indigenous persons (there’s a reason why Washington is at this time called the Football Team) Pirate synonym was the designated home team in both games (Raiders in XVIII, Buccaneers in LV). Both teams won Regular season meeting 1983: aired on NBC, which had the AFC package at the time 2020: aired on CBS, which as of this posting has the AFC package Also: this game would’ve been played in Los Angeles… if it wasn’t for some rain…
1. The Raiders actually lost a Super Bowl by that point, Super Bowl 2 vs Green Bay. 2. How about parallels to Super Bowl 36? Tom Brady, in his first full year starting for his new team, leads an 11-5 team into the Super Bowl. There they played an offensive juggernaut from Missouri who had won the Super Bowl within the previous two seasons and went into the game with a record of 14-2, which included going 8-0 on the road. Whew. 3. For what it’s worth I thought of the same parallels to Super Bowl 18, but not quite to the depth you did.
Another correlation you could potentially make is that the Raiders and Buccaneers are both teams that ressemble "Pirates" and the Redskins and Chiefs are both teams that could ressemble "Natives." Just something else to imagine.
Cliff Branch clipped Anthony Washington on that play! I realize now that it did not affect the play of the game so it was not called but as a 8 year old I was kicking and screaming about it when it happened live.
You forgot to add that both the Chiefs and Redskins are "Indians" and both the Buccaneers and Raiders are "Pirates". Both games the Pirates beat the Indians.
1983 Redskins were better offensively and defensively than the 2020 Chiefs. 83 Redskins were 3 points away from an undefeated season and set a scoring record which stood for a generation.
1984 is when the "smart grid" went active. Remember the Macintosh computer commercial featuring apple products? Now we have Gates wanting to inject us with the "matrix" because of CO--D-1984. Superbowl 54 and Superbowl 17 were eerily similar as well!!! KC storms back with the help of anemic quarterback play from Garropolo. Reminded me of David Woodley! Superbowl 51...Patriots down 28-3 vs Atlanta....Superbowl 28 played in Atlanta. Georgia guidestones!!!! We are in a matrix!!! Deja vu and synchronicity abound!
He included all these obscure similarities but left out one of the more obvious in that a team with a pirate mascot beat another team with an Indian mascot. Anyone wanna take a guess as to why?
You left out that The Redskins and Chiefs are references to Native Americans and Raiders and Buccaneers are references to pirates. Also that both Plunkett and Brady are former Patriots QB’s.
I don't think that they are the same. Super Bowl 18 was the Los Angeles Raiders VS. The Washington Redskins. Super Bowl 55 was between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. And the Raiders lost Super Bowl 2 before Super Bowl 18.
@@teto85 Yeah, that was a joke based on the fact that from the age of 15, Plunkett looked retirement age, and the fact that Brady will probably be winning Super Bowls at age 75.
The main thing that undid the Chiefs was missing their 2 starting OTs. That combined with the Bucs having NT Vita Vea available for this game (missed the 1st meeting with a broken ankle) and needing to be double-teamed meant that Jason Pierre-Paul and Shaq Barrett got singled up by backup OTs. The only reason why Patrick Mahomes was sacked only thrice is because of his athleticism.
Excuse me! But the Raiders lost Super Bowl II by the score of 33-14. Oh, I'm not the 1st person to notice this error. The score right before the half of Super Bowl XVIII was by the defense, and the score right before the half of Super Bowl LV was by the offense. What ifs count for nothing.
Every since Roger Goodell took over as commissioner there has been a lot of funny business going on in the result of most of these games he is mostly about the show and less about the sport more like P.T Barnum.
Superbowl winners during the 2010's. 2010: Green Bay. 2011: New York. 2012: Baltimore. 2013: Seattle. 2014: New England. 2015: Denver. 2016: New England. 2017: Philadelphia. 2018: New England. 2019: Kansas City.
No repeat champion in a period consisting of a specific decade 1920s: Canton Bulldogs, GB 1930s: CHI 1940s: CHI | AAFC: CLE 1950s: DET, CLE, BAL (today IND) 1960s: GB (5/7, last to win 3 straight) | AFL: HOU (today TN), BUF 1970s: PIT (4/6, back-to-back twice) 1980s: SF (needed Montana magic in SB23) 1990s: DAL, DEN 2000s: NE (most recent back-to-back champion) 2010s SEA: Malcolm Butler INT ended Seahawks reign NE: went to 3 straight games, but sandwiched between 28-3 & lowest scoring game ever is Philly Philly KC’s Super Bowl appearances are in 2 different decades but their quest to repeat ended - just like WSH in 1983 - in a blowout L in a Super Bowl in TB
As I've pointed out.. its' the NFL rehashing an old story from the past with different teams. 1982 Team with a Native American name (Washington Redskins) defeats a team from FLORIDA... 27-17 1983 Same team with a Native American name loses in a blowout to a CALIFORNIA team 9 to 38 (scoring only 9 pts) 2020 Team with a Native American name (Kansas City Chiefs) defeats a team from CALIFORNIA... 31-20 2021 Same team above... loses in a blowout loss to a team from FLORIDA while scoring only 9 points. 9-31. Hollywood does this crap in the world of movies. They rehash past successful films keeping the same flow of the film.. they just give it a new name, new actors, and the locales may change in the story. But otherwise, it's considered a "formula" that is repeatable. Look for this to happen AGAIN in the coming years. But try and figure out what past they are trying to replicate. Also, don't think they could rig this? Think again. Go all the way back to the Tampa-Atlanta game in the season (Game one)... where Tampa was losing and the referee picks the ball up and moves it one full yard (without explanation) to give Tampa a first down (I think it was about to be 4th down if he didn't). That referee was the son of the referee who called the "Tuck game" (research it). They are very good friends with Brady. Tampa got a touchdown on that drive and ended up winning the game. In fact, thereafter, they did not lose a single game. 7-5 at the time... ran the table after that. NFL was suffering from massive ratings losses. In a "pandemic", where everyone had nothing else to do but stay home and---watch tv--- were tuning out. Tom Brady is the poster boy for the NFL. The "G.O.A.T." as is branded even by the league. The NFL's Michael Jordan, Wayne Gretzky... etc But oddly, it seems they are also following a script. Early in the 2000's the NFL *did* in fact change the definition of their league from "Sports League" to... "Entertainment". This should be concerning for a lot of reasons. It means they don't have to legit anymore when it comes to the outcomes of certain games. The weird irony is that sometimes even attempts to "fix" a game backfires and the other team still wins. I believe that's happened before because not everyone can be "in" on a conspiracy. Too many people would ruin it.. But still... this is more than just an oddity or a coincidence. The two teams that both the Redskins faced in the 80s and that the Chiefs faces lately... are from the same states. Florida and California. With each team going 1-1 vs them. They just changed around the order. (remember what I said that Hollywood does with scripts about changing a few things around so it's not so obvious?) Sounds crazy right? Well this entire world has gone stupid crazy these days. I honestly don't know what to think anymore
Bro you missed one of the biggest ones. The starting QB for the winning teams were both former QBs for the Patriots and were both drafted by the Pats. Some of these are good but on others you could do some digging and find lots of comparisons between other SBs. Plus, in SB XVIII the Raiders scored a special teams TD on a blocked punt and a defensive TD on a pick 6. The Bucs in LV didn't score a special teams or defensive TD. Also, KC was primarily a passing team with Mahomes. Even though Theismann was the 83 MVP somehow, Washington was a running team primarily with Riggngs running for 1347 yds and 24 TDs. Not sure how that's not the MVP of 83 but whatever.
Patrick Mahomes had to run all over the place to throw the football oline was not helping him since the starters were injured and the defense not doing their job
Hell look at the names of the team names and mascots Washington and Kansas city had native American mascots and Los Angeles and Tampa Bay had basically pirate mascots
To make matters worse, Bucs NT Vita Vea, who missed the 1st meeting, played the Chiefs this time and because Eric Bienemy already knew he had to have two OLs on him, keeping the Bucs' edges in check was gonna be nearly impossible due to backup OTs having to handle those guys one-on-one.
To prove my point further next year we will finally get our superbowl l rematch KC v Green Bay that will be Aaron Rodgers Swann song Roger Goodells NFL is so scripted it isn't funny anymore.
Also a Pirate team beat a team with a Native American mascot
Facts
back before soy boys posted on the internet, we call them indians
@@johnliberty3647 more like back when people were complete idiots and called people not from India “Indians.”
@@Eli-ss9gj yes, everyone who doesn't see the world the way you do are all idiots
Yarrrrrrrr! 🏴☠️
Even more crazier both games was aired on CBS
In 1985 the Super Bowl were in California won by a Team from California In 2022 the Super Bowl will be in California all i can say watch for the Chargers they and the 49ers are the only teams that never left the state
@@coreylevine3856 wrong its the rams but they are in California
2:15 The Raiders lost Super Bowl II to the Packers. Nevertheless, it's a good video.
How do you remember Super Bowl 1 but not 2
Did you actually forget to mention that BOTH games were pirates versus Native Americans?
back when men discussed suck thing we called them Indians
Thank you; I posted on this just earlier today.
@@johnliberty3647 aren't they basically the same thing? Lol
Love this dreamy tune you use in your videos sometimes.
Donkey Kong Country underwater level vibes
There are a some that you didn't mention.
1. Mascots similarity in both the winners and losers. Winning teams were the Raiders and Buccaneers. Losing teams were the Redskins and Chiefs.
2. You can also draw some similarities to the previous year's Super Bowl. Washington won Super Bowl 17 by 10 points despite trailing going into the fourth quarter. The Chiefs won Super Bowl 54 by 11 points despite trailing going into the 4th quarter.
3. Both Plunkett and Brady were drafted by the Patriots. Both were raised in the Bay Area.
The parallels between this game and the 83 Redskins are scary. Both the Chiefs and Redskins finished 14-2. Both were Indian themed(Chiefs and Redskins). Both teams played and beat pirate themed teams(Raiders and Buccaneers) in the regular season. Both averaged 30 points a game(Chiefs 29.6 which rounds up to 30)in the regular season. The two pirate teams they beat in the regular season by 2 and 3 points in each game beat them by 30+ points to 9 points(raiders 38 washington 9 and Buccaneers 31 chiefs 9). Both offenses looked unstoppable only to be easily shut down in the super bowl.
I was thinking about this when I was watching the Super Bowl especially with the Native American and Pirate Mascots.
Also the first TD in Super Bowl XVIII was blocked punt.
Chiefs and Redskins: Native American related names. Buccaneers and Raiders: Pirate related names.
Tom Brady = Jim Plunkett? (Actually, both former New England QBs, so there's that.)
And both members of AARP when they won.
@@deanjo57790 But very different paths. Brady was a nobody coming out of college and had very good success early in the NFL. Plunkett was superstar in college (Heisman) but took a while to find success at the pro level.
One difference- SB LV lacked a signature play ala Marcus’ 74 yard TD run or the Squirek INT
The only thing i can think of is Mahomes throwing that pass while falling (if that)
If the normal network rotation was followed for this Super Bowl Al Michaels would have called it for NBC. His two Super Bowl calls from Tampa were the iconic SB25 and SB43. Instead CBS covered the game. That makes the scores of their three Super Bowls from Tampa (SB18, SB35, and SB55) 38-9, 34-7, and 31-9.
Another sort-of parallel; the last QB before Brady to win a SB in his 1st season with his new team was Trent Dilfer of the 2000 Baltimore Ravens in SB XXXV, another team with a vaunted defensive unit. And that Super Bowl was played....in Tampa.
Pat Sumerall and John Madden.
Also Super Bowl XXVIII was the last Super Bowl win for the AFC for 14 years. If the AFC wins the next 13 Super Bowls then that would be very crazy!
Actually, the Raiders had lost a SB before. SB II: Green Bay 33 Oakland 14.
I will admit, however, that it wasn't called the "Super Bowl" at the time. Lamar Hunt coined the term a year later.
If we ignore the pre-merger era, the Packers would have 2 rings, Chiefs 1, and Jets 0
That was the day I was born!
Kind of hard to ignore the Jets' win. I am not like certain idiots who think SB III brought about the AFL-NFL merger, because that was already agreed upon. But without that victory, I wouldn't be surprised if the merged NFL would have decided to drop the Super Bowl altogether.
@@eddiejc1 Oh no doubt. Namath’s guarantee in SB III will always be remembered. I hope the Jets go back soon. Things can turn around very quickly in this league, see the Bengals.
The Super Bowl was called the Super Bowl starting with Super Bowl I.
@@markgraham2312 Yes the first SB was played in 1967. However, its official name was AFL-NFL Championship until 1969.
So on a Monday Night Football Game during November 2023, we should anticipate Mahomes breaking his leg in a gruesome way during a botched Flea Flicker.
Against a star NFC opponent defender picked second overall 5 years prior. 2019's 2nd overall pick was Nick Bosa and with the addition of the 17th game the niners could very well play the chiefs in 2023
Oh God nooooooo!!!!
His predecessor, Alex Smith, already had that happen.
Yeah, but it will just be Smithed and not Theismanned.
Nope but Washington QB broke his leg similarly as Joe Theisman 33 years later with Theismsman in attendance.
I got one for you guys:
Superbowl 10, Steelers 21, Cowboys 17
Steelers scoring was a touchdown, a touchdown and missed conversion, two field goals and a safety.
Cowboys scoring was two touchdowns and a field goal...
Superbowl 36 Giants 21, Patriots 17
Giants scoring was a touchdown, a touchdown and missed conversion, two field goals and a safety.
Patriots scoring was two touchdowns and a field goal...
Super Bowl 36 was Patriots vs St. Louis Rams. Super Bowl 46 was the NYG Patriots rematch
Didn’t Jim Plunkett, the Raiders QB used to play in New England. Just like Tom Brady on the Buccaneers.
The team names and mascots are similar as well Washington and Kansas city had native American mascots and Los Angeles and Tampa Bay have basically pirate mascots as well
I was waited for him to point that out
But now it’s a big w
thats the first thing i noticed...
I've already read other comments talking about super bowl 2, but there is one detail you left out regarding the quarterbacks of the winning team. Both Jim Plunkett and Tom Brady were drafted by the patriot's. Not to mention that the losing team in both games have similar mascots.
The winning teams had similar mascots is well. And not only were Plunkett and Brady drafted by the Patriots but both were from the Bay Area.
Also the fact that in super bowl 19 featured a california team in the nfc west winning their second title in franchise history against a quarterback in his second season where as in super bowl 56 featured a california team in the nfc west winning their second title in franchise history against a quarterback in his second season.
Both games were broadcasted on CBS
The 2020 was eerily similar to the 2002 season
2002: The Buccaneers won the super bowl in blowout fashion against an AFC West team
2020: The Buccaneers won the super bowl in blowout fashion against an AFC West team
2002: The Browns played the Steelers in the wild card round.
2020: The Browns played the Steelers in the wild card round.
2002 was also the last year the Browns made the playoffs before 2020
2002: The Patriots missed the playoffs
2020: The Patriots missed the playoffs
2002: The Broncos beat the Patriots in Foxboro
2020 The Broncos beat the Patriots in Foxboro
Let all that sink in for a second.
That was cool. It's crazy how many similarities there were between those games. Good job breaking it down.
oh wow I had not thought about this but you are 100% correct! I saw both games and I agree with you
I have another one for you, 55-18=37 and in SB 37 Tampa Bay Defeated the Oakland Raiders (Raiders were the Victorious team in SB 18).
”A team that has never lost the Super Bowl”
Super Bowl 2: am I a joke to you?
I kind of find it funny that 100% effort for accuracy of resemblance wasn't achieved in regards to NFL team logos in some of these older network telecasts. I mean, that's Super Bowl XVIII, and the team's logos look like they were designed by a second grader (I also noticed that on the clip promoting the 1980 game between Tampa Bay and the Rams). I'm okay with it in retrospect, but I'm just surprised that the NFL was fine with how their league's helmets were portrayed onscreen (I know that technically every team is individually owned, but no way that something like this could last).
High definition graphics did not exist yet in 1984, and also the the broadcast signals were different. This was before digital signals and 4K.
@@ericfitzgerald9214 I don't know though, don't you think the logos could still be a little better, even without digital & 4k, which are relatively new to the medium?
The teams are individually owned like a McDonald's franchise is individually owned. They all have to follow basically the same rules.
At least one other ditto stat....both winning quarterbacks were in the twilight of their careers, and both started their careers in New England.
Also, both winning teams are versions of pirates.
That was great, thanks much. In my 74 years I've never been much of a prognosticator, but I actually predicted that picksix because Theisman had thrown that very pass so many times before. All those similarities I would never have guessed; you have good instincts for this stuff young man.
He even threw it in the regular season game against the Raiders in almost the same situation, but it went for a huge gain. The Raiders expected the play in the Super Bowl.
Not quite. The scores were 31-9 and 38-9 respectively. The only common themes were that the defending champion scored 9 points as high-powered offenses, they were rematches and the location was in Tampa. But I can see the parallels between the two. Fairly accurate otherwise. Good video. Worth a subscription for the effort and detail.
The scores would've been identical if not for Joe Haeg dropping that TD pass. The Bucs turned the ball over on downs on that drive.
@@marcus813 close but no cigar
Also CBS aired both
Bob Costas said the same at the have time of the second time the ny gaints faced the new patriots when the score was 9 gaints and 10 patriots . When in the gaints first time went to the super bowl against the broncos the score was 9 gaints and 10 broncos at half time.
Cliff branch should be in the Hall of Fame already WTF.
And here's another fun fact--guess who Tampa Bay beat in its first Super Bowl appearance to win Super Bowl XXXVII? The Oakland Raiders, formerly...the Los Angeles Raiders, who won Super Bowl XVIII...
BTW, what was Reid thinking with those timeouts? You're playing against Tom Brady--an aging Tom Brady, yes, but there's a reason he's one of the best QBs of all time (including several wins against Reid-coached teams), and you're giving him MORE time?!?
At least Mahomes wasn't playing against the 1985 Bears defense--he'd need an ambulance, given how hard they hit...
The winning teams wore different shades (Raiders wore dark, Bucs wore light) However they WOULD have matched if TB had worn the unis they were supposed to have. Remember it was an odd numbered year, so the Bucs (NFC) should have worn their dark jerseys.
Should’ve but I think they went with the white jerseys because the trend of teams wearing white jerseys winning the super bowl that dates all the way back to super bowl 33. From that point up to super bowl 56 only 6 teams wearing dark jerseys have won the super bowl. And two of these dark jersey winning teams were quarterbacked by Tom Brady.
Just sayin' ---> one last similarity that some may have overlooked between these two Super Bowls: the winning teams' monikers had to do with pirates(Buccaneers, Raiders); the losing teams' names had to do with American Indians(Redskins, Chiefs). I'll show myself out now...
At 2:17 you said ‘the Raiders had never lost a Super Bowl before’
The Raiders lost to the Packers 33-14 in Bowl Ii
True but the Raiders are 3-2 in Super Bowls. They lost their second SB which was their last appearance to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers 48-21 in San Diego. The pirate bowl! Gruden bowl which Tim Brown said it was sabotage!
@@oldschoolman3557 we can reword it, never lost a Super Bowl as an NFL team
Let’s just pretend that this game ever happened
I've been doing that with SB XVIII since I was 8.
Superbowl winners during the 2020's.
2020: Tampa Bay.
2021: ?????
2022: ?????
2023: ?????
2024: ?????
2025: ?????
2026: ?????
2027: ?????
2028: ?????
2029: ?????
2010: Green Bay Packers
2011: New York Giants
2012: Baltimore Ravens
2013: Seattle Seahawks
2014: New England Patriots
2015: Denver Broncos
2016: New England Patriots
2017: Philadelphia Eagles
2018: New England Patriots
2019: Kansas City Chiefs
2021 : Rams
2022 : KC
2023 : Las Vegas
2024 : Cleveland
2025 : Washington
2026 : Dallas
2027 : Chicago
2028 : Miami
2029 : Jacksonville
@@last7509
2021: Buccaneers
2022: Packers
2023: Chargers
2024: Dolphins
2025: Chiefs
2026: Chargers
2027: Jaguars
2028: Eagles
2029: Giants
You can also look at parallels in the 2015 Texas Bowl: Fournette dominated while Mahomes got no o-line nor defensive help
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
actually i was thinking that aside from mahomes having already won a super bowl and brady about to win his 7th instead of just his second, this reminded me a lot of super bowl 19
Tremendous analysis and comparisons--Amazing how almost identical these games were.
The difference is the Raiders didn't pay the refs off
Other similarities
Both games aired on CBS. LV was actually NBC’s turn but the two networks swapped games because LVI is happening during the 2022 Winter Games when NBC is televising that event & the major networks have an agreement not to put on any other programing during the game
Both games were won by the team that are synonyms for pirate over the team that has issues with portrayals of indigenous persons (there’s a reason why Washington is at this time called the Football Team)
Pirate synonym was the designated home team in both games (Raiders in XVIII, Buccaneers in LV). Both teams won
Regular season meeting
1983: aired on NBC, which had the AFC package at the time
2020: aired on CBS, which as of this posting has the AFC package
Also: this game would’ve been played in Los Angeles… if it wasn’t for some rain…
Both teams also lost to pirate based teams and each super bowl also contained 1 AFC West team
1. The Raiders actually lost a Super Bowl by that point, Super Bowl 2 vs Green Bay.
2. How about parallels to Super Bowl 36? Tom Brady, in his first full year starting for his new team, leads an 11-5 team into the Super Bowl. There they played an offensive juggernaut from Missouri who had won the Super Bowl within the previous two seasons and went into the game with a record of 14-2, which included going 8-0 on the road. Whew.
3. For what it’s worth I thought of the same parallels to Super Bowl 18, but not quite to the depth you did.
The Chiefs are from Kansas
@@bRETTfAVREatgbnyjmni The Chiefs are from Kansas City, Missouri, not Kansas City, Kansas
@@chriserrington5958 dang Ive been lied to... My bad
How about this: a team with a pirate mascot blew out a team with a Native American mascot.
Don’t forget that the Tom Brady team lost to the Missouri Team in the regular season.
Great video love it
As a Raiders fan I hate to say we lost sb2
Another correlation you could potentially make is that the Raiders and Buccaneers are both teams that ressemble "Pirates" and the Redskins and Chiefs are both teams that could ressemble "Natives." Just something else to imagine.
Evan more weird the buccaneers scored exactly 31 points against every playoff opponent
Both games... Indians vs Pirates
At 5:55, you said ‘the final touchdown of each game’ Allen’s 74 yarder.
That was not the final TD, that made it 28-9.
Cliff Branch clipped Anthony Washington on that play! I realize now that it did not affect the play of the game so it was not called but as a 8 year old I was kicking and screaming about it when it happened live.
Radiers lost Super Bowl 2. And the Super Bowl in the was the only Super Bowl between two dynaties.
You forgot to add that both the Chiefs and Redskins are "Indians" and both the Buccaneers and Raiders are "Pirates". Both games the Pirates beat the Indians.
Redskins scored a TD and the extra point was blocked by Hasslebeck.
The Chiefs scored on 3 FGs
1983 Redskins were better offensively and defensively than the 2020 Chiefs. 83 Redskins were 3 points away from an undefeated season and set a scoring record which stood for a generation.
1984 is when the "smart grid" went active. Remember the Macintosh computer commercial featuring apple products? Now we have Gates wanting to inject us with the "matrix" because of CO--D-1984.
Superbowl 54 and Superbowl 17 were eerily similar as well!!! KC storms back with the help of anemic quarterback play from Garropolo. Reminded me of David Woodley!
Superbowl 51...Patriots down 28-3 vs Atlanta....Superbowl 28 played in Atlanta. Georgia guidestones!!!!
We are in a matrix!!! Deja vu and synchronicity abound!
Raiders lost Super Bowl II… also, first TD of Super Bowl XVIII was on a blocked punt. Everything else seems to be pretty accurate.
He included all these obscure similarities but left out one of the more obvious in that a team with a pirate mascot beat another team with an Indian mascot. Anyone wanna take a guess as to why?
A glitch in the Matrix.
You left out that The Redskins and Chiefs are references to Native Americans and Raiders and Buccaneers are references to pirates.
Also that both Plunkett and Brady are former Patriots QB’s.
1980s redskins Are a Look at the 2020s chiefs
I don't think that they are the same. Super Bowl 18 was the Los Angeles Raiders VS. The Washington Redskins. Super Bowl 55 was between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. And the Raiders lost Super Bowl 2 before Super Bowl 18.
Also, wasn't Plunkett like 75 years old at the time of that Super Bowl, much like Brady is.
Plunkett was under 35 and Brady is almost 45. Plunkett had accumulated more injuries in his career..
@@teto85 Yeah, that was a joke based on the fact that from the age of 15, Plunkett looked retirement age, and the fact that Brady will probably be winning Super Bowls at age 75.
@@deanjo57790 Well, Plunkett had a harder life than Brady as well. Especially when Plunkett played for the Pats.
The main thing that undid the Chiefs was missing their 2 starting OTs. That combined with the Bucs having NT Vita Vea available for this game (missed the 1st meeting with a broken ankle) and needing to be double-teamed meant that Jason Pierre-Paul and Shaq Barrett got singled up by backup OTs. The only reason why Patrick Mahomes was sacked only thrice is because of his athleticism.
Excuse me! But the Raiders lost Super Bowl II by the score of 33-14.
Oh, I'm not the 1st person to notice this error.
The score right before the half of Super Bowl XVIII was by the defense, and the score right before the half of Super Bowl LV was by the offense.
What ifs count for nothing.
Every since Roger Goodell took over as commissioner there has been a lot of funny business going on in the result of most of these games he is mostly about the show and less about the sport more like P.T Barnum.
Superbowl winners during the 2010's.
2010: Green Bay.
2011: New York.
2012: Baltimore.
2013: Seattle.
2014: New England.
2015: Denver.
2016: New England.
2017: Philadelphia.
2018: New England.
2019: Kansas City.
No repeat champion in a period consisting of a specific decade
1920s: Canton Bulldogs, GB
1930s: CHI
1940s: CHI | AAFC: CLE
1950s: DET, CLE, BAL (today IND)
1960s: GB (5/7, last to win 3 straight) | AFL: HOU (today TN), BUF
1970s: PIT (4/6, back-to-back twice)
1980s: SF (needed Montana magic in SB23)
1990s: DAL, DEN
2000s: NE (most recent back-to-back champion)
2010s
SEA: Malcolm Butler INT ended Seahawks reign
NE: went to 3 straight games, but sandwiched between 28-3 & lowest scoring game ever is Philly Philly
KC’s Super Bowl appearances are in 2 different decades but their quest to repeat ended - just like WSH in 1983 - in a blowout L in a Super Bowl in TB
2 SB'S SCRIPTED ON PURPOSE 2B IDENTICAL.
the 9 points Washington scored included a touchdown. the 9 points KC scored were three field goals
FALSE VIDE
1 game was 31 - 9
1 game was 38 - 9
So by 2060, the Chiefs will have to change their name?
As I've pointed out.. its' the NFL rehashing an old story from the past with different teams.
1982 Team with a Native American name (Washington Redskins) defeats a team from FLORIDA... 27-17
1983 Same team with a Native American name loses in a blowout to a CALIFORNIA team 9 to 38 (scoring only 9 pts)
2020 Team with a Native American name (Kansas City Chiefs) defeats a team from CALIFORNIA... 31-20
2021 Same team above... loses in a blowout loss to a team from FLORIDA while scoring only 9 points. 9-31.
Hollywood does this crap in the world of movies.
They rehash past successful films keeping the same flow of the film.. they just give it a new name, new actors, and the locales may change in the story.
But otherwise, it's considered a "formula" that is repeatable.
Look for this to happen AGAIN in the coming years. But try and figure out what past they are trying to replicate.
Also, don't think they could rig this?
Think again. Go all the way back to the Tampa-Atlanta game in the season (Game one)... where Tampa was losing and the referee picks the ball up and moves it one full yard (without explanation) to give Tampa a first down (I think it was about to be 4th down if he didn't).
That referee was the son of the referee who called the "Tuck game" (research it).
They are very good friends with Brady.
Tampa got a touchdown on that drive and ended up winning the game.
In fact, thereafter, they did not lose a single game. 7-5 at the time... ran the table after that.
NFL was suffering from massive ratings losses. In a "pandemic", where everyone had nothing else to do but stay home and---watch tv--- were tuning out.
Tom Brady is the poster boy for the NFL. The "G.O.A.T." as is branded even by the league.
The NFL's Michael Jordan, Wayne Gretzky... etc
But oddly, it seems they are also following a script.
Early in the 2000's the NFL *did* in fact change the definition of their league from "Sports League" to... "Entertainment".
This should be concerning for a lot of reasons.
It means they don't have to legit anymore when it comes to the outcomes of certain games.
The weird irony is that sometimes even attempts to "fix" a game backfires and the other team still wins.
I believe that's happened before because not everyone can be "in" on a conspiracy.
Too many people would ruin it..
But still... this is more than just an oddity or a coincidence.
The two teams that both the Redskins faced in the 80s and that the Chiefs faces lately... are from the same states. Florida and California.
With each team going 1-1 vs them. They just changed around the order.
(remember what I said that Hollywood does with scripts about changing a few things around so it's not so obvious?)
Sounds crazy right?
Well this entire world has gone stupid crazy these days.
I honestly don't know what to think anymore
WOW HOW BAZZZZZZZZAAAARRRRR
Bro you missed one of the biggest ones. The starting QB for the winning teams were both former QBs for the Patriots and were both drafted by the Pats. Some of these are good but on others you could do some digging and find lots of comparisons between other SBs. Plus, in SB XVIII the Raiders scored a special teams TD on a blocked punt and a defensive TD on a pick 6. The Bucs in LV didn't score a special teams or defensive TD. Also, KC was primarily a passing team with Mahomes. Even though Theismann was the 83 MVP somehow, Washington was a running team primarily with Riggngs running for 1347 yds and 24 TDs. Not sure how that's not the MVP of 83 but whatever.
Face it, Tom Brady's NO Jim Plunkett. 🏈
Yeah, but, how much worse does that SB loss to a flash-in-the-pan Eagles team, without HOFers, that completely imploded, within three years, look now.
Both were drafted by the Patriots.
Patrick Mahomes had to run all over the place to throw the football oline was not helping him since the starters were injured and the defense not doing their job
Hell look at the names of the team names and mascots Washington and Kansas city had native American mascots and Los Angeles and Tampa Bay had basically pirate mascots
To make matters worse, Bucs NT Vita Vea, who missed the 1st meeting, played the Chiefs this time and because Eric Bienemy already knew he had to have two OLs on him, keeping the Bucs' edges in check was gonna be nearly impossible due to backup OTs having to handle those guys one-on-one.
They were also aired on CBS
Pat Summerall broadcasted both games
And an Apple commercial aired during 55.
Interesting when you consider that Pat Summerall died 8 years before SB LV was played.
This is not just de ja vu these games are rigged give me a damn break I was born at night but not last night.
More subs
To prove my point further next year we will finally get our superbowl l rematch KC v Green Bay that will be Aaron Rodgers Swann song Roger Goodells NFL is so scripted it isn't funny anymore.
The nfl is rigged