2016 vs 2000 Air Jordan 11 Space Jam Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 158

  • @rccharger21
    @rccharger21 8 років тому +23

    That 2000 pair is gorgeous btw! lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +2

      Yes they are! Surprised no sole separation

    • @fer4616
      @fer4616 3 роки тому

      I kno while 2016 is conpletely trash iam never buying the 2016

  • @HowIanLives
    @HowIanLives 8 років тому +12

    everyone knocking the higher patent leather wtf is that doing too you its still the same shoe... and its still sick

  • @222c30
    @222c30 5 років тому +3

    The heel part goes down 3 spaces on the 2001 and that is how it was drawn

  • @ScratchinAway
    @ScratchinAway 3 роки тому +1

    the 2000 says “Jumpman Jam” on the tongue too vs “Jumpman Jordan” on the ‘16’s

  • @cdiggs3783
    @cdiggs3783 8 років тому +1

    Some people may be saying there aren't any peaks because on the SNKRS app the pics show no peak on the toe box. But there is a peak on one side of the shoe.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Yea i am not sure why the SNKRS App doesn't have a peak on the toe..it's weird.

  • @zacharyturtleslayer9772
    @zacharyturtleslayer9772 8 років тому +3

    Awesome video man!!!! Thanks for taking time out of your day to make this video for us!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      No problem at all! Thank you for watching

  • @Spixiez
    @Spixiez 6 років тому +1

    Thank you, kinda got scared because on the recent space jams have a higher patent leather and I wasn’t quite sure...

  • @KevinDaWolf
    @KevinDaWolf 8 років тому +1

    Next time for future videos you should get a little flash light and use it to look inside at the color of the insoles when you can't take them out

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +2

      Appreciate that. I will do that for sure.

    • @KevinDaWolf
      @KevinDaWolf 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com thanks SF and also thanks for coming through with detailed comparisons and reviews they are really good!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Yung Gawblin Thank you so much! I greatly appreciate that. Helps me keep going.

  • @rccharger21
    @rccharger21 8 років тому +4

    OMG!!! Footlocker just called me and I won a raffle!!! My entire day has been made :) So happy I can't even explain... It's my absolute favorite shoe of all time!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Congrats! I am happy for you! Love that feeling.

  • @Djogbee
    @Djogbee 8 років тому +3

    The sole turning really makes the shoes in my opinion they should of made them that way

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Seems like a lot of people like the yellow look. I think it's cool, don't mind it.

  • @onimusha222000
    @onimusha222000 8 років тому +3

    i still take the 2016. the blue sole is dope and match. well.. may not 100% og but...sneaker also need some upgrade or renew, right? still.. the old version of sneakers must have a better leather quality. Man..it is sad at some points that we now pay more but we are not getting the same good quality of leather...
    Good video.. thanks! you make me love 11 more does before.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Appreciate the compliment! Yea I think I have leaned more toward the 2016 release..really like them.

  • @vtrang721
    @vtrang721 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder if nike will ever use a different material for the soles that doesn't oxidize

  • @LeBeautiful
    @LeBeautiful 8 років тому +1

    Classic comparison for Classic shoes. 👏👏👏

  • @rccharger21
    @rccharger21 8 років тому +1

    Also, one interesting thing that I noticed about the official images of the shoes on the nike website and on the snkrs app, they don't have peaks on the toe box. Interesting, but those images were undoubtedly taken a while ago lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +3

      Yea I am not sure why that is to be honest. I have had my hands on two different pairs from two different authentic retailers and it's exactly the same.

  • @CJmk3supra
    @CJmk3supra 8 років тому +1

    Love your vids, gotta get me some 2000 space jams. They got the jumpman twerking lol

  • @derekdaniels9906
    @derekdaniels9906 8 років тому +5

    dope video👍an comparison imo I can't say one is better than the other they're both fire an different shoes one is the real space jam(2000) an the other is a MJ PE(2016aka*black concords*) the reason I say that is due to the 16 having the 45 an JB only threw the spacejam title on these to hype up the shoe even more which I felt was unnecessary because it's a Jordan 11 they're gonna sell regardless.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you! I honestly feel like they are two different models..both unique, both classics and dope!

  • @Mik3Mcflyy
    @Mik3Mcflyy 8 років тому +1

    Awesome comparison man! This video helped me understand why the 2016 came out the way they did.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Thank you very much! I appreciate that.

  • @Blasian_guy
    @Blasian_guy 8 років тому +1

    Another dope video! 🙏🏿

  • @donairechristianp
    @donairechristianp 7 років тому +1

    Thinking about it now, the peak is bothering me (OCD Life) lol.

  • @QS-si3cq
    @QS-si3cq 6 місяців тому

    Important to note, even years later, that when you say "OG" here, you are referring to MJ's Space Jam pairs which had the concord accents, because the Jam was never released until 2000. So, the concord coloring is OG to MJ's pairs, but the royal blue is the OG 2000 public release color.
    Also, respectfully, you forgot to point out that the external tongue tag says "JUMPMAN JAM" on the 2000 and "JUMPMAN JORDAN" on the 2016 (2009 says this as well). MJ's personal pairs had the non-JAM tag. Again, "OG" is relative here between Jordan's personal pairs and the first official public release of the shoe.

  • @kenheales559
    @kenheales559 8 років тому +1

    I love the 2016s. Love the concord sole!!!

  • @chalonbrown7121
    @chalonbrown7121 8 років тому +1

    those look mad nice

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Yea I can't lie..both are super dope

  • @AliFrazier100
    @AliFrazier100 8 років тому +1

    Keep it up Bro

  • @sneakerexplorer7522
    @sneakerexplorer7522 8 років тому +1

    I get a pair just today lucky im soo hype right now

    • @staledog1417
      @staledog1417 8 років тому +2

      Rafael Bug-os u are a very very very lucky person

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Glad you got them!

  • @billthomas9562
    @billthomas9562 8 років тому +1

    I am glad they went with the slanted toe box

  • @sneakercrazy16mn54
    @sneakercrazy16mn54 8 років тому +3

    good to see the 2000 and 2016 very nice video man I still like the 2016 more I know leather is better known the 2000 but leather cut on 2016 it's a bit higher just love the one blue sole keep it coming bro💪

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Thank you! Yea I love both but love the higher cut patent leather as well.

  • @TheDudeAbides1998
    @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому +3

    I will just call the P.E. versions the Black Concord 11s.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      That's dope..nothing wrong with that.

    • @TheDudeAbides1998
      @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com
      one guy that was doing a comparison was going with that nickname (black concord) as well.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      EmperorJBO LOL which guy was that?

  • @spectacular_god9763
    @spectacular_god9763 8 років тому +1

    I'm tried of all these space jam 11 vids cuz I'm starting to think he making fun of ppl like me who don't have them lol. but for real I like both pairs I can't wait tell this Saturday

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +3

      Not meaning to rub it in. Just wanted to showcase to everyone the differences between the two. Good luck on your pair this Saturday.

    • @spectacular_god9763
      @spectacular_god9763 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com I know lol but thanks I should be able to get em

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Spectacular _God Did you cop?

  • @davidbrown1995
    @davidbrown1995 6 років тому

    If I got a DS pair of the 2000s do you think it’s wearable?

    • @aj-mn9fk
      @aj-mn9fk 5 років тому

      Yea but I wouldn’t lmaoo you can sell them bitches

  • @SVTVasquez
    @SVTVasquez 8 років тому

    does the GS pair come with the same box as the adult?

  • @VintageDonny216
    @VintageDonny216 4 роки тому

    I’m Sorry But 2016 Pair Isn’t Space Jam W/45 It’s Black Concord PE Why? MJ Worn These In 2 Of Last Series Of ECSF In 95 Against Shaq And Penny Right After He Got Fined By NBA From Wearing Regular Concord W/45 And Changed His Regular Number 23 On The Jersey Side Way Before The Movie Came Out A Year Later On The Flip Side There’s Actual Space Jam In 2000 Release Even The Tag Said “Jumpman Jam” On It

  • @NYCBiGDEAZ718
    @NYCBiGDEAZ718 8 років тому +1

    so you wouldnt wear the 2000 11s? cuz im tryna buy it on ebay but i dont wanna wear it then they seperate and i crack my ankle or something? lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I wouldn't wear the pair here..but I would wear them. Just know that separation could happen...just need to re-glue.

  • @feverfan0
    @feverfan0 8 років тому

    I cant believe I didn't receive any callbacks for these shoes. I will have to go online to try.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Sorry for the late reply, I am pretty sure I saw on another comment you got them from JJ?

    • @feverfan0
      @feverfan0 8 років тому

      I got them actually from Footlocker from those who didn't pick up their raffles because our JJ in the mall don't accept returns. I am glad I went up a 1/2 size because the 7.0 I secured from Nike had to be returned because they were too tight. So happy

  • @lamontmcdaniels322
    @lamontmcdaniels322 8 років тому +3

    2016 because it looks more to tha og's mj played in that retailed for 125$ lol

  • @beastvx
    @beastvx 8 років тому +1

    I need theesee

  • @Crazy-ek2ox
    @Crazy-ek2ox 8 років тому +2

    Really hope I can be the lucky one who wins the giveaway but I love these comparison videos it's really nice seeing what the old vs new looks like

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +2

      Thank you! Glad you enjoy them. Good luck to you!

    • @Crazy-ek2ox
      @Crazy-ek2ox 8 років тому

      SneakerFiles.com thanks ^.^

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      Itz Emerson no problem

  • @jaydee1950
    @jaydee1950 8 років тому +2

    You forgot that the 2000 it says Jumpman jam instead of jumpman Jordan

  • @lamemixedbreed17
    @lamemixedbreed17 8 років тому +2

    At first I wasn't a fan that it had the 45 on it but now I'm starting to like it more than the 23

    • @HeyOzzy24
      @HeyOzzy24 8 років тому +1

      maya lee I just appreciate the fact that Jordan Brand had the 45 stitched on instead of printed on.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      That 45 grows on people lol

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      agreed

  • @Anthony-xl3fx
    @Anthony-xl3fx 8 років тому +4

    Will the 2016 turn yellow?

  • @ceezgeez1793
    @ceezgeez1793 8 років тому

    the other day i said that Nike has hired all the rep factories to make their shoes. What do you think about this?

    • @fredmorris1481
      @fredmorris1481 8 років тому

      Ceez Geez totally agree every element of a fake 11 all in one

    • @fredmorris1481
      @fredmorris1481 8 років тому

      Ceez Geez widows peak, high patent leather, off shape on the toe box like come on...

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      LOL I see what you are getting at...but OG Jordan 11s did have all these elements.

  • @geraldomoya4151
    @geraldomoya4151 8 років тому

    Wussup, What's Hannin'! This is LACED WITH SOLE, I'm from San Francisco California. I'm here to bring in-depth views of the latest "Hyped" sneakers to drop. Yes, Yes I know it's almost been a week since release date but Finally decided to create a channel! Please Like, Comment, Subscribe and stay tuned for more. CHECK ME OUT

  • @zacharyturtleslayer9772
    @zacharyturtleslayer9772 8 років тому

    Also why in the world do you think they'd make them with the peaks?

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Closer to the Original release. They came with peaks.

  • @Syahidsahoarder
    @Syahidsahoarder 7 років тому

    what is the value of these 2000s?

  • @wax4168
    @wax4168 5 років тому +1

    2000 pair...JUMPMAN JAM

  • @sneakercrazy16mn54
    @sneakercrazy16mn54 8 років тому

    Man this have nothing to do with your video but I was checking my nike account and it says that my reservation for the DB 7 it's expired but I didn't know anything about now it says sold out do u know anything about that

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      For the DB 7? I know nothing about that...haven't heard anything.

  • @gbjunior89
    @gbjunior89 8 років тому

    main difference between them all is that the 2000 is the only one that says "jumpman jam" across the tongue.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      My apologies. I must have missed that.

  • @teshajorden1838
    @teshajorden1838 8 років тому +2

    notification squad !!! 👍👍👍💋💋💗💗

    • @teshajorden1838
      @teshajorden1838 8 років тому

      classics are are stiil better to me, the bottoms on the 2016 are 🔥🔥

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Dope!

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      I respect that. Yea those soles are fire!

  • @jubeikibagami
    @jubeikibagami 8 років тому

    do they fit the same?

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      I am not sure to be honest..however the 2016 is true to size.

  • @rubenluvsmig
    @rubenluvsmig 8 років тому +1

    wish I had both lol cool review

  • @soundviewspill4792
    @soundviewspill4792 8 років тому +1

    I would have preferred a stitched in 23 instead of 45

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      I respect that. Most people seem to want that.

  • @djj1
    @djj1 8 років тому +4

    This shoe really jus shows how JB been steady bullshittin on retros over the last decade...as far as being true to form. "remastered"

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      LMAO...yea very true.

    • @TheDudeAbides1998
      @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому

      All they are missing on the 2016 is the leather quality on the ankle. Along with the padding on the ankle collar and tongue. IMO, wish they would go back to the black/gray shoe box they used in the 90's.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому

      EmperorJBO Yea that's very true. Would have been very nice to see that return. The Silver boxes from the 90s or the Jordan Face boxes from 2000s?

    • @djj1
      @djj1 8 років тому

      I jus peeped my og bred 11s, they have peaks but not as high up as these...like they emphasised these lol

    • @TheDudeAbides1998
      @TheDudeAbides1998 8 років тому

      dee jay
      why don't you just call the black/red 11s- Playoff 11s. It sounds silly to say bred 11s- sounds like your making a sandwich.

  • @Camjj89
    @Camjj89 8 років тому +2

    I put in 14 raffles and won 3 of em. So I had to double up and bought a 3rd pair to sell.

  • @oDarlynHD
    @oDarlynHD 8 років тому

    I want these so bad

  • @DawoodGaming
    @DawoodGaming 8 років тому

    Really hyped about the drop hope I won the giveaway

  • @JhalinskyMAn
    @JhalinskyMAn 8 років тому +1

    The 2016's are better imo. Also don't wear these with jeans. These look better with basketball shorts. Trust me...

    • @SupremeJ
      @SupremeJ 8 років тому +1

      Black Republican Lol do you know how to dress stylish or nah?

    • @JhalinskyMAn
      @JhalinskyMAn 8 років тому +1

      Oh no random ppl are cyberlly attacking me lol..but fr i got em already and they look weak with jeans.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      I have always thought the same!

  • @drakelit5752
    @drakelit5752 8 років тому

    nice

  • @222c30
    @222c30 5 років тому

    Nooo

  • @geddowarrior8125
    @geddowarrior8125 8 років тому

    tha yellowin look$ pi$$y but at tha $aym tyme it givz tha $hoo a gum boddum type of look az well.

  • @KillzoneLOL
    @KillzoneLOL 8 років тому +2

    bruh break the shoes in and the leather will get softer

    • @keneishawilliams7864
      @keneishawilliams7864 8 років тому

      you know the difference between the feel even if you have wore the shoes

    • @delfra70
      @delfra70 8 років тому

      True, that's the only reason the 2000 ones leather is like that because it's broke in. The 2016's will look that way too when their broke in.

    • @sneakerfiles
      @sneakerfiles  8 років тому +1

      Leather does break in..but quality is still better...

  • @ax1338
    @ax1338 8 років тому

    Like if you think the 2009 pair is the best

  • @jacobarana2834
    @jacobarana2834 8 років тому

    Aye wsp

  • @jesusmoreno852
    @jesusmoreno852 3 роки тому

    The 2016 is garbage compared to the 2000, let’s be honest

  • @fer4616
    @fer4616 3 роки тому

    Compmetely different shoes 2016 trash quality