@Hyper Borea there is info out there if you know where to look, the adverse side effects to all the CV19 vaccines are on the government website, but it's not being spoken about so most don't know it's there, nevermind what the side effects, both serious and mild are
@Hyper Borea nah we will all belive you instead...you seem a lot more credible. I have just finished preparing a roast chicken and have some tin foil left over. Want me to make a hat for you...?! 🤣
@Hyper Borea these figures aren't good, the government wouldn't have any reason to lie about them. But I know about it because I did my own research before making a decision to not have it, and the choice needs to be an individual one for all not pressurised into it one way or the other. As a side note gene therapy and therapeutics are different things. Therapeutics are things like the remdesivir or steroids to treat the symptoms, the gene therapy which is what I think you were meaning isn't used. It used mRNA that messenger cells that take the recipe for for body to create the proteins. Now we don't know enough about it, but it isn't gene therapy. Always check up on wjat you hear anyone saying, do your own research, of people like GP's and the people with strange theories online.
@Hyper Borea I'm not saying you should and I support your choice, I made the same choice. I'm saying you need to research the wacky theories because you sound like an idiot and that doesn't help the message your trying to share.
@@JACOPO.OFFICIEL yes and countries are too busy trying to control the spread of covid to properly investigate where it originated. China have definitely covered up all the evidence by now
No vaccine or medicine is 100% safe. It is therefore understandable that pharmaceutical companies want some legal protection before making a vaccine - otherwise there would be no incentive to start the process at all, and the world would be without vaccines.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 So why aren't ALL drugs companies immune also? Don't you think that making a system where people can make any old shit with no consequences. I'll see what I can whip up in my lab and sell it yeah? Do you think that people that were affected by Thalidomide shouldn't have been able to sue?
@@morlanius That's a reasonable question. Pharmaceutical companies don't have *complete* legal protection- and they can still suffer the consequences for unsafe development etc. But ultimately this comes down to what is profitable, in this imperfect world we live in. Vaccines can and do, in extremely rare cases, kill people. This is offset against their massive contribution to a healthy society. Thalidomide was a terrible tragedy and a scandal, but this was 50-60 years' ago. Regulations have been very significantly tightened since then.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 But not, not only have they been loosened to make it easier for the vaccine to be released and the companies given ADDITIONAL legal protection. Not to mention we have a media and a legal system that will literally persecute people for being critical. If the protections were adequate when why do they need more? if the risk prevention practices are good then why were they slacked off? So we have slacked off risk prevention and reduced culpability to the producers .. whatever could go wrong?
@@morlanius It's one of the main issues with the legalities of medical practice. Consider that medical doctors are legally allowed to inflict harm on a patient that absolutely no-one else would be allowed to do. They are allowed to do this under the objective of seeking to prevent a greater harm. For example, cutting a chunk of flesh out of someone in the hope of carving out the cancer growth that is present in that chunk of flesh. Another example, breaking someone's bones because they haven't healed right from an earlier break and the healing process needs to be restarted. This is analogous to that. Vaccines can't be flawless. There will always be an element of risk. However, in nearly every case the risk posed by the vaccine is trivial to the point of insignificance next to the risk posed by the disease to anyone who catches it. Yet if a person suffers an adverse reaction to a vaccine the costs of legal fees in the sueing process can potentially break a company, which can prevent the production of the vaccine. So the companies get protected from prosecution in a manner similar to how the doctors are protected. It's not an exact parallel in dynamic but it's close. Obviously it's not a perfect way to prevent a cessation of vaccine production as we can all see a potential for abuse here, but that's life. The alternative of allowing anyone to sue a vaccine company if they think the vaccine has harmed their kid or whatever has its own problems
Really odd that the EU is complaining about the UK getting an "unfair share" of the AstraZeneca vaccine, but at the same time stating they don't want to use it because of safety concerns.
Not true at all. Some countries paused vaccination because of young healthy women who took the vaccine died. Vaccination is continued again. The EU lacks millions of doses which AZ promised to deliver. That is the problem.
Pro tip: The EU and individual European countries are not the same and can act independently of eachother. But looking at your Brexit success I'm not surprised you don't know that.
@@deleder557 No they didn't. Their deaths had nothing to do with the vaccine. AZ did not "promise to deliver" you moron, the contract is to deliver what is available. The EU made the contract public. The problem is you still don't comprehend that.
@@Komodo1312 Not for their vaccine programme they're not. Yeah looking at the UK's Brexit success especially with vaccinations it's not surprising we know more than you do. Bit funny how you being the moron thinks you're in the know? You're an intellectual lightweight here Komodo.
@Elliott Wright Everyone is entitled to their opinion and point of view. Do what makes you happy. Not everyone wants to participate in this national solidarity..for or against. Some of us just want to enjoy or lives not being told what to do.
@Elliott Wright I don’t know what baseless opinions you are referring to. Even so, what’s it to you? If you don’t agree with said “baseless opinions”, then you don’t agree. Get on with your life. Quite simple really.
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 Do I really have to explain this to you. I will go ahead and explain it to you I will just presume that you got starved of oxygen during child birth. And only have the limited intellectual development. I was making a point because at the time the BBC did not have any coverage of the march that was happening in London.
They don't want to talk about that. Here in US, we have several Governors who are in hot water (thank goodness) over that issue. Quarantined covid positive patients into nursing homes at the beginning of the pandemic, exposing elderly people to the virus and lots died. Cuomo in NY, Whitmer in MI, NJ and PA governors. Cuomo in trouble now. Whitmer on the way. I hope those Governors get what they so rightly deserve.
@@robinbradshaw2060 yeah but thay shouldnt be, the only reason that this is the case is because before 1986 vaccine manufactorers were being sued by a lot of people because their products were injuring people, but in 1986 they were somehow granted immunity for their products, by the way, I am not an antivaxxer, i am just stating the past events that has set the precedent for why these companies can't be held accountable.
@@robinbradshaw2060 no if you are seriously disabled up to 60% from other vaccines you get a 120k pay out from the government thats standard just not with the coronavirus vaccine.
Sorry, just trying to find a news channel. Just thought there might be some coverage of the thousands of people marching through London protesting the lockdown fiasco.
Then why come to a video titled like this one? It obviously wasn't going to be about that so why don't you find one of the many ones that ARE about it?? Are you stupid or something?
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 Just browsing really, and as i'm forced to pay £159.00 bbc licence fee i would like to see the lockdown march on the bbc, do you know if it will be on.?
Nothing is 100% safe, even getting into bed. If you want vaccines to be made, the rules have to stay the same. You can get compo from the government though, so don't worry.
People think this is a new thing for this vaccine, this has been the case for most vaccines, you can still sue! It’ll just come from the government/tax payer rather than the company it’s self
@@gumjuicee6746 the payout is limited otherwise the government would go bankrupt but it’s going to be bankrupt soon anyway so there will be nothing for anyone, you’ll be sick as a dog and no one will care.
@Trigger Roddy No one is forcing your relative to take the vaccine. By the way you asked the question the vaccine would be better off with someone else than with your degenerate gene pool. Everything has risks but with this vaccine the benefits heavily outweigh the risks.
@omega 98 aren’t half population vaccinated? And all elderly and vulnerable, if there’s another lockdown will prove vaccines are useless , people marching are 96.4 percent safe if anything they will naturally get heard immunity!
I'm just confused. How can they declare it safe when it hasn't been tested for the required amount of time that is usually needed to assess such things
You BBC haters truly are their biggest fans 😂 you can't resist clicking on their videos, giving them a view and a comment. They'd go under if it wasn't for people like you giving them what they want. Well done 👏🏻
@@jgt_ Conspiracy theorists use their brains and read between the lines(lies) on the tv news .They study for hours on what's being told to validate whether truth or lie They are very wise people with much knowledge
@@doveronefoxtrot4417 If that were the case then you would want to train your immune system so that is has some in-built protection against a virus hitherto unknown in humans. In other words, you would take a vaccine.
It's really quite simple. Anything new that's produced in record time with a liability disclaimer and for vast profits is bound to be at the very least suspect.
You do realise that, contractually, the AstraZeneca vaccine cannot be profitable until July this year at the very earliest? They have nothing to gain by pushing vaccines out as fast as they can now while they make no profit.
@@TASIAawful1 she's ok now but who knows about the consequences. The side effects she had experienced can't be normal. Also, ambulance refused to come as they didn't know how to treat her.
@@alexkoluzh8173 Wow, that is horrible! i will not be taking the vaccine, AZ and modern and pfizer are all dangerous! they say they will all be mandatory eventually to work/buy/sell you must have the vaccine in the future! will you take it ? i wont, what will we do then though? this is pure evil
@@elsa9026 If it becomes mandatory at any point, I think it is a reason for serious protest. It will become absolutely obvious that something isn't right with this whole story. I am not going to take it as I am feeling just great, as usual. There is no answer to the question: "why should one take it if they never got sick?"
@@alexkoluzh8173 exactly, healthy people dont need it and it can even get sick from it, the unhealthy can die from it in the longterm, some people are saying its safe cus there are no short term effects, its the longterm that is the issue! people dont understand that! we must stay vigilant!
@@chriswhittaker5075 many vaccines and medicines that took much longer to develop using tried and tested methods were then later recalled due to safety fears, nothing on this scale, all these jabs bypassed animal testing so guess who the Guinea pigs are?
That figure is absolutely untrue; wherever you read that was trying to mislead you. 0 people have died from taking the vaccination after many millions of doses, and the blood clotting is probably unconnected, and in line with national averages.
I got it. My blood didn't clot. I didn't start buying microft. No microchips in it. No side effects whatsoever. Except I feel strangely less irritated by all the Windows bugs now.
I've just had my first one too. Like you I don't know whether to have the second jab. There is so much fear mongering going on about the AZ at the moment.
If there’s a more smug, condescending, sneering know it all I’m yet to know them. My colleague, this expert, politicians, this issue, I know cause I’m a “journalist” yeah sure you do.
@@danierinash7952 do you not even consider that a possibility? You don’t think the BBC would have actors from the security services to promote govt propaganda? Really? Read “propaganda” by Edward bernays and come back to me on that one. Naive or stupid, I’m not sure? But they most certainly will as would most countries.
75% effective (according to the manufacturers of course) against an illness with a 99.7% recovery rate without need for experimental chemicals with unknown long term health risks
“Benefits far greater than the risks”might well be true for some categories of people but that is a very different statement from “safe and effective” certainly than “perfectly safe”.
I took this vaccine and my arm is still sore from three days ago. I couldn’t move it at all yesterday morning, I was ill yesterday night. I drank some handmade ginger, garlic, turmeric and lemon tea and felt better and the soreness has reduced and the headache as well. I’m not sure I want a second jab.
That means the vaccine's working. It's putting the virus in you so your immune system has a response and analyses it. Learnt it in biology, from a trusted source.
Exactly what they say you might expect before you are given the jab. We are back in the space of the MMR jab scare, a generation not taking that jab due to bad information then as young adults outbreaks of mumps etc making there very sick. Follow your own path not what other people tell you. Remember, the jabs are to make your body react so it recognises the virus in future so its primed to attack it so it doesn't impact you as badly should it happen. Like anything in life this is risk management.
Perfectly safe vaccine, i had shortness of breath and fevers for atleast a week! Not just me but my colleagues as well. And they never listed SOB in the expected side effects. I always have yearly vaccines and i never experienced such reactions. Some even had cellulitis on their arm. Time for them to really review this vaccine.
yea the vaccine can be pretty dangerous for young healthy people since they most likely would survive covid no problem but might get really bad cases of blood clots all over their body and die as we in Norway experienced.. only reason we were looking so much into it is because medical workers, very healthy medical workers with no problems got bad cases of blood clots and had to be treated at the hospital and one medical worker died.. they would have a higher chance of surviving covid than taking the vaccine.
@@Djnffnoeosmfasjjd Moderna quote- Using mRNA to create medicines is a complex undertaking and requires overcoming novel scientific and technical challenges. We need to get the mRNA into the targeted tissue and cells while evading the immune system. If the immune system is triggered, the resultant response may limit protein production and, thus, limit the therapeutic benefit of mRNA medicines. We also need ribosomes to think the mRNA was produced naturally, so they can accurately read the instructions to produce the right protein. And we need to ensure the cells express enough of the protein to have the desired therapeutic effect. Doesn't sound like your normal vaccine. What do you think???
A national embarrassment. Oxford is supposed to make the world believe it to be one of the worlds greatest universities. When push comes to shove - it isn't!
It made a mom pass out and her child died in the bath. Working on all your addresses, make sure your kids still live and know what all of you did. You are a hate crime. Life in prison.
I had it today and it was ok to start with. But I don't feel great now. Getting pain in hands and right leg now. Don't no what they put in this vaccine.
ASTRA (WEAPON) ZE (THAT) NECA (KILLS) ua-cam.com/video/2zoSSHx9QtA/v-deo.html & earthheroestv.com/search?search=fitts do. you notice chaos around the w0rld? look "they" are behind everyth1ng and 7 bi11ion of us are aga1nst this sup3r r1ch and the1r space pr0jects worth watching these to the end to see who they are ASTRA(WEAPON) ZE (THAT) (NECA (KILLS)
"This vaccine is safe and effective in preventing COVID-19 and it's benefits continue to be far greater than it's risks." What are the risks is the question.
J Thomas again, what a busy person you are. All over this comments section just like Covid. All anyone has to do Is look on the "Yellow Card" reporting system on the Goverment website. There Is loads more data available via the "office of national statistics"
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 There's an old man who comes into my shop every day and buys 2 Twix. He's 95 years old and he refuses to get that poison in his arm. He said he's seen too many pricks like you in his time.
@Emz 3103 It's literally impossible to die from the vaxx. There are numerous news stories about young healthy people dying within 24 hours, not to mention the 1,700 deaths reported on VAERS. But last night NBC reported that nobody has died from the vaxx.
Millions are attending the CV Freedom marches all over the world today. With by far the biggest in London. And what have you seen on the BBC about the march? ZILCHO.
@@oliverbeedham where do i start?? Maybe youre being sarcastic? Maybe try the UK Colomn, here on youtube, for some information for a start. Listen to aome doctors and scientist who are currently being censored because theyre deviating from the official narrative.
@@joetaylor8602 Yes they do!, they may not be so open and blatant about it, but you must have your head up your... in a dark smelly place, if you cant see it!
Friend nobody's asking,probing ,questioning, informing, and esp "warning you" of these things you have suggested,," blood clots= blockages= strokes= heart attacks,, nobody as ever suggested or warned me, I've had strokes,i have brain diseases etc etc,,but people"patients " are made to look silly,"oh what would you know","we are experts" we know better what's best for you
@@worldpeace8299 it depends, there are some experts who are honestly just educated idiots who will just parrot what ever they are told to, good example neil furgason.
@@sean3874 You mean people who are called experts but are not experts? Hmmm. Or do you mean by the expression "educated idiot" that "parrots" what they are told to someone who know the truth but is telling a lie because someone else has told them to?
@@worldpeace8299 i am talking about people who dont scrutinise the official narritive or ask any questions about what the mainstream media, governments and special interest groups are pushing they basically say what they think is the truth, but they never confirm it, they have misplaced trust in people and organisations that have an agenda so their opinion is always based off their faith in what some tv expert or expert with conflicts of interest said, for example, dr fauci is the highest paid person in the us government, why has this not been investigated? and why do so many people including other experts treat what this guy says as some kind of gospel?
I love how often they feel the need to have a 'scientist' say 'ah but vaccine good! vaccine good!'. Becoming a parody of itself. That first lady was spot on in the first half of her sentence though.
ASTRA (WEAPON) ZE (THAT) NECA (KILLS) ua-cam.com/video/2zoSSHx9QtA/v-deo.html & earthheroestv.com/search?search=fitts do. you notice chaos around the w0rld? look "they" are behind everyth1ng and 7 bi11ion of us are aga1nst this sup3r r1ch and the1r space pr0jects worth watching these to the end to see who they are ASTRA(WEAPON) ZE (THAT) (NECA (KILLS)
They even said in the news report that it is not a cause of DVT, this is about an exceedingly rare type of clotting in the brain which there isn’t sufficient evidence to be linked to the vaccine. If you are worried about the exceedingly rare brain blood clots these would, in theory, occur pretty much within the first few days of being vaccinated. Some countries are suggesting that if you have had a headache for 4 days after the vaccine you should go and see your doctor. Honestly this is a 1 in a million event at best. It needs to be investigated but it’s not something anyone who is thinking of getting the vaccine or who has had the vaccine already should worry about.
Plenty of shit goes down in this world to report on. For all its faults the BBC is yet to get deep into youtube conspiracy land mind fuck that its detractors take with their tea each morning.
BBC News says holidays this summer unlikely because.., wait for it...., (There is a risk!)..., is that the way we are to live our lives now, because there MIGHT be a risk?
This analysis can also be useful to British citizens. In examining the data published on the website of the Istituto Superiore Sanità in Italy, it can be seen that at 1 March 2021 the number of deaths attributable to Covid was about 96,000. All the people who died were recorded as "positive" at Covid, not as dead "because" of Covid. It necessarily follows that an undetermined part of the deaths did not occur exclusively due to Covid, even if no one could deny that the Sars-cov-2 infection, together with other coexisting pathologies, may have been a contributing cause of death. However, as regards in particular the positivity of the deceased, there are some logical inconsistencies, as emerges from the analysis carried out by the IIS itself, relating to a sample of about 6,000 medical records, evidently considered representative of the entire number of deaths positive. In fact, from the examination of these folders, it appears that: 1) In 90.4% of the records the diagnosis of hospitalization referred to conditions such as pneumonia, respiratory failure and symptoms such as fever, dyspnoea, cough, compatible with SARS-CoV-2. 2) In 600 cases, the diagnosis of hospitalization was not related to the infection; 3) In 83 cases the diagnosis of hospitalization concerned only neoplastic pathologies; 4) In 195 cases cardiovascular pathologies (for example acute myocardial infarction-AMI); 5) In 247 cases the diagnosis of hospitalization concerned other pathologies; 6) In 75 cases gastrointestinal pathologies (for example cholecystitis, intestinal perforation, intestinal obstruction, cirrhosis); If the sample is true and completely representative, it must therefore be assumed that at least 9.6% of the deceased, even if cataloged together with the others in the IIS report, did not have to do with Covid, nor as a direct cause. nor as a contributing cause, unless it is shown that the infection occurred during hospitalization or intensive care, which until now does not appear in official data. Not only that, if the remaining 90.4% of the deceased presented in the hospitalization diagnosis conditions and symptoms simply "compatible" with Sars-Cov-2, it is not possible to exclude that some or many of them have been hospitalized and then died precisely for pneumonia or respiratory failure due to other diseases. Furthermore, if at the time of hospitalization the deceased people had conditions and symptoms that were simply "compatible" with Sars-Cov-2, when their "positivity" or the degeneration into a real disease of this positivity was definitively ascertained ? The only moments in which positivity and illness could be ascertained were those of hospitalization or intensive care, but this is not apparent from the examination of medical records carried out on a sample basis by the IIS. For the above, there are good reasons to believe that a certain number of the 96,000 deaths that died positive at 1 March 2021, did not actually die from Covid.
So why is it in the UK we do not have enough AstraZeneca vaccine in April? If everybody does not want AstraZeneca vaccine then why we do not have enough in the UK to jab people?
There is a tactic in marketing, and psychological manipulation based on the reaction to supply and demand. If you make something seem as though it is very desirable to others, and is in short supply....well, I'm sure you can guess the rest. It's a racket, think of 'Black Friday', and the diamond cartel.
So have I, do I care about what the politicians are saying? no. people who suffered blood clots after AZ is 12 and no. of people who suffered blood clots after Phisfer is around 10. After approx. 20m vaccines being given there is no spike in blood clots. This is all fear mongering nonsense yet again from the dishonest BBC.
@Stuart Cumings That makes no sense. What wasn't tested on a virus? the AZ vaccine. 100% sure it was ... What about society and travel?? I want my old accustomed freedom. I was born with that right and I want it back. Doesn't mean you have leave the house. You are free to do as you please this is the foundation of a free democratic society and people handed it away with such ease. Again, can you re-write your reply to make sense please?
@@tetraquark2402 you'll be alright mate, my father got the astra/oxford vaccine and hes in good shape but he was already healthy anyways and habitually takes responsibility for his health instead of relying on big pharma conpanies to keep him alive.
This hasn’t aged well. Who’s here in 2024 who knew the truth all along?
👍👍👍👌👌💖💖
Many not here in 2024 who didn't.
It's very nostalgic 😊
To anyone reading the comments in the future, as of May 2024 AstraZeneca pulled its vaccine completely globally, due to risk of 'rare' side effect.
The U.K. leaving the eu does not look like such a bad thing. As someone who voted remain I am pleased we left this horrible organisation
ditto
Remain ?????!!!! Go have a jab you fool !!!!
you definitely didn't vote remain
@@method9787 i don’t want to remain I am happy to admit I made a mistake voting to remain
@@knucklesamidge 😂 I don’t give a shit what you think or believe carry on with your stupid name
Simple solution for all this is to give people a choice of what they wish to get inside of their body. IF THEY WISH TO TAKE IT THAT IS.
@Hyper Borea there is info out there if you know where to look, the adverse side effects to all the CV19 vaccines are on the government website, but it's not being spoken about so most don't know it's there, nevermind what the side effects, both serious and mild are
@Hyper Borea nah we will all belive you instead...you seem a lot more credible. I have just finished preparing a roast chicken and have some tin foil left over. Want me to make a hat for you...?! 🤣
@Hyper Borea these figures aren't good, the government wouldn't have any reason to lie about them. But I know about it because I did my own research before making a decision to not have it, and the choice needs to be an individual one for all not pressurised into it one way or the other.
As a side note gene therapy and therapeutics are different things. Therapeutics are things like the remdesivir or steroids to treat the symptoms, the gene therapy which is what I think you were meaning isn't used. It used mRNA that messenger cells that take the recipe for for body to create the proteins. Now we don't know enough about it, but it isn't gene therapy. Always check up on wjat you hear anyone saying, do your own research, of people like GP's and the people with strange theories online.
@Hyper Borea I'm not saying you should and I support your choice, I made the same choice. I'm saying you need to research the wacky theories because you sound like an idiot and that doesn't help the message your trying to share.
@Hyper Borea where ever you got gene therapeutics from...
Look into their eyes. Look at how empty and soulless they are as they lie to you day in and day out.
DEMONS.
@@NowisEvollovetion You are very silly people.
@@NowisEvollovetion Why are you on their channel ? Who forced you ?
I love how the biggest critics of the BBC are actually their biggest fans 😂 you can't stay away.
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 I think they are here to have their say in this democratic society.
P.S: have you had you're A.Z jab yet.
China - "can't believe how easy this was".
It's not only China... there are alot of powerful people and businesses on this one 😉
I hate China this isn’t a naturally occurring virus like they claim.
DR Anthony Thanos Fauci
@@Mrjoboo1 it's man-made 😉
@@JACOPO.OFFICIEL yes and countries are too busy trying to control the spread of covid to properly investigate where it originated. China have definitely covered up all the evidence by now
Why else would the vaccine companies get immunity from being sued over it before the release of vaccines?
No vaccine or medicine is 100% safe. It is therefore understandable that pharmaceutical companies want some legal protection before making a vaccine - otherwise there would be no incentive to start the process at all, and the world would be without vaccines.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 So why aren't ALL drugs companies immune also? Don't you think that making a system where people can make any old shit with no consequences. I'll see what I can whip up in my lab and sell it yeah? Do you think that people that were affected by Thalidomide shouldn't have been able to sue?
@@morlanius That's a reasonable question. Pharmaceutical companies don't have *complete* legal protection- and they can still suffer the consequences for unsafe development etc. But ultimately this comes down to what is profitable, in this imperfect world we live in. Vaccines can and do, in extremely rare cases, kill people. This is offset against their massive contribution to a healthy society. Thalidomide was a terrible tragedy and a scandal, but this was 50-60 years' ago. Regulations have been very significantly tightened since then.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 But not, not only have they been loosened to make it easier for the vaccine to be released and the companies given ADDITIONAL legal protection. Not to mention we have a media and a legal system that will literally persecute people for being critical. If the protections were adequate when why do they need more? if the risk prevention practices are good then why were they slacked off?
So we have slacked off risk prevention and reduced culpability to the producers .. whatever could go wrong?
@@morlanius It's one of the main issues with the legalities of medical practice.
Consider that medical doctors are legally allowed to inflict harm on a patient that absolutely no-one else would be allowed to do.
They are allowed to do this under the objective of seeking to prevent a greater harm. For example, cutting a chunk of flesh out of someone in the hope of carving out the cancer growth that is present in that chunk of flesh. Another example, breaking someone's bones because they haven't healed right from an earlier break and the healing process needs to be restarted.
This is analogous to that.
Vaccines can't be flawless. There will always be an element of risk. However, in nearly every case the risk posed by the vaccine is trivial to the point of insignificance next to the risk posed by the disease to anyone who catches it. Yet if a person suffers an adverse reaction to a vaccine the costs of legal fees in the sueing process can potentially break a company, which can prevent the production of the vaccine.
So the companies get protected from prosecution in a manner similar to how the doctors are protected.
It's not an exact parallel in dynamic but it's close.
Obviously it's not a perfect way to prevent a cessation of vaccine production as we can all see a potential for abuse here, but that's life.
The alternative of allowing anyone to sue a vaccine company if they think the vaccine has harmed their kid or whatever has its own problems
Really odd that the EU is complaining about the UK getting an "unfair share" of the AstraZeneca vaccine, but at the same time stating they don't want to use it because of safety concerns.
Not true at all. Some countries paused vaccination because of young healthy women who took the vaccine died. Vaccination is continued again. The EU lacks millions of doses which AZ promised to deliver. That is the problem.
Pro tip: The EU and individual European countries are not the same and can act independently of eachother. But looking at your Brexit success I'm not surprised you don't know that.
@@deleder557 She got a blood clot, the vaccine didn't kill her, if she was taking birth control pills that could have easily been responsible.
@@deleder557 No they didn't. Their deaths had nothing to do with the vaccine. AZ did not "promise to deliver" you moron, the contract is to deliver what is available. The EU made the contract public. The problem is you still don't comprehend that.
@@Komodo1312 Not for their vaccine programme they're not. Yeah looking at the UK's Brexit success especially with vaccinations it's not surprising we know more than you do. Bit funny how you being the moron thinks you're in the know? You're an intellectual lightweight here Komodo.
The lesson being learnt is people don’t trust everything they’re told. People no longer want to be herded along.
@Elliott Wright Everyone is entitled to their opinion and point of view. Do what makes you happy. Not everyone wants to participate in this national solidarity..for or against. Some of us just want to enjoy or lives not being told what to do.
@Elliott Wright It makes them feel special. People with insignificant lives believe they can escape their mediocrity by disbelieving the system.
@Elliott Wright I don’t know what baseless opinions you are referring to. Even so, what’s it to you? If you don’t agree with said “baseless opinions”, then you don’t agree. Get on with your life. Quite simple really.
When you can show that they keep lying, why should anyone believe them.
Hospitals near me are quiet
They just admitted it
So isn't the BBC reporting on what is actually happening in London.
Depends what is in the small print when you get funded by certain bodys.
Yes they are. But what can you say? More protests, more clashes with police.
Probably not on a video with this title. As well you knew when you clicked on it.
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 Do I really have to explain this to you. I will go ahead and explain it to you I will just presume that you got starved of oxygen during child birth. And only have the limited intellectual development.
I was making a point because at the time the BBC did not have any coverage of the march that was happening in London.
@@carlneilson700 Incidentally, anyone who wants to starve their brain of oxygen, wear a mask. It works perfectly.
How come there is no inquiry about thousands that have died in care homes
ua-cam.com/video/3jbethXIwK0s/v-deo.html
They don't want to talk about that. Here in US, we have several Governors who are in hot water (thank goodness) over that issue. Quarantined covid positive patients into nursing homes at the beginning of the pandemic, exposing elderly people to the virus and lots died. Cuomo in NY, Whitmer in MI, NJ and PA governors. Cuomo in trouble now. Whitmer on the way. I hope those Governors get what they so rightly deserve.
It's so safe we weren't offered it until they were waived any litigation.
Its so safe that its not fda approved
All makers of vaccines are free from prosecution. All of them not just the covid. It’s nothing new.
@@robinbradshaw2060 yeah but thay shouldnt be, the only reason that this is the case is because before 1986 vaccine manufactorers were being sued by a lot of people because their products were injuring people, but in 1986 they were somehow granted immunity for their products, by the way, I am not an antivaxxer, i am just stating the past events that has set the precedent for why these companies can't be held accountable.
@@robinbradshaw2060 and thalidomide was perfectly ok for pregnant women.
@@robinbradshaw2060 no if you are seriously disabled up to 60% from other vaccines you get a 120k pay out from the government thats standard just not with the coronavirus vaccine.
We have a huge problem with the vaccine in S Korea. Many people doubt its safety of the AZ vaccine, but no one give them a clear answer.
Sorry, just trying to find a news channel. Just thought there might be some coverage of the thousands of people marching through London protesting the lockdown fiasco.
Idiot, that's all over the news
Then why come to a video titled like this one? It obviously wasn't going to be about that so why don't you find one of the many ones that ARE about it?? Are you stupid or something?
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 Just browsing really, and as i'm forced to pay £159.00 bbc licence fee i would like to see the lockdown march on the bbc, do you know if it will be on.?
@@Jerry21238 yes jerry it will be on in a minute.
@@chriswhittaker5075 Watch the Voice Of Reason, and it's freeee.
Welcome to this afternoon's edition of the Truman show.
*YOU ARE IN ON THE CONSPIRACY. SO ARE THE REST OF THESE SOCIAL MEDIA COMMENTERS. THIS COMMENT SECTION LIKE ALL IS FAKE. SECRET CONSPIRACY CULT.*
If it's safe then why can we not sue if our relative dies from it. ? Or hold the makers accountable . ?
Nothing is 100% safe, even getting into bed. If you want vaccines to be made, the rules have to stay the same. You can get compo from the government though, so don't worry.
People think this is a new thing for this vaccine, this has been the case for most vaccines, you can still sue! It’ll just come from the government/tax payer rather than the company it’s self
@@gumjuicee6746 the payout is limited otherwise the government would go bankrupt but it’s going to be bankrupt soon anyway so there will be nothing for anyone, you’ll be sick as a dog and no one will care.
@Trigger Roddy No one is forcing your relative to take the vaccine. By the way you asked the question the vaccine would be better off with someone else than with your degenerate gene pool. Everything has risks but with this vaccine the benefits heavily outweigh the risks.
@@danieltj6194 what benefits?
Just the tip of the ice berg,its very very bad news
London looks good today what what!
What?
@omega 98 aren’t half population vaccinated? And all elderly and vulnerable, if there’s another lockdown will prove vaccines are useless , people marching are 96.4 percent safe if anything they will naturally get heard immunity!
The covid bots are out with their ai responsea
@omega 98 You pathetic 77th *anchor.
@omega 98 Bedwetter!!!
Amish communities don’t have COVID because they said they ‘don’t have TV’
That joke is 9mths old an on thousands of videos, but true
Shut up dr moncliovic ur old it’s a joke it’s funny
That and the fact they don't mix with normal people...
Hahaha! Fools
A simple google search tells you this just isnt true
Politicising science means corrupting science
science is corrupt, it's based on unproven theories.
@@eddieash1669 like religion made of fairytales
I'm just confused. How can they declare it safe when it hasn't been tested for the required amount of time that is usually needed to assess such things
They can't its piffle
thats the smell of the RAT! and why i didnt touch a drop of it.
I have some news to share with you!
nothing ‘confusing’ about ZERO long term safety &/or efficacy data
THEY CHANGED THE PAMPHLET
EVERY TIME A SIDE EFFECT IS DETERMINED OR DETECTED
Paracetamol has side effects do you read the leaflet ?
@@terencereeder9830 YES THANKS
Loving the daily PSYOP updates. Thank you BBC 🥰
Pos tony wasted money on war
You BBC haters truly are their biggest fans 😂 you can't resist clicking on their videos, giving them a view and a comment. They'd go under if it wasn't for people like you giving them what they want. Well done 👏🏻
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 nothing wrong with seeing what the enemy is saying
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 Stop talking bollocks you silly government troll.
@@tonythephonyblair9355 his account was created last year... Always a good way to figure them out 👌
77th brigade and GCHQ government bots and trolls incoming.
@@jgt_ Conspiracy theorists use their brains and read between the lines(lies) on the tv news .They study for hours on what's being told to validate whether truth or lie They are very wise people with much knowledge
@@juliehornby7948 no, they are people who choose to believe the non reality every time for the hell of it
@@chriswhittaker5075 f we're going to mention Hell - do you seriously trust Mr Gates, Mr Fauci et al ? If you do - Good Luck with that. God Bless you
@@chriswhittaker5075 Chris Witty? Shill alert!!!
@@juliehornby7948 fkn,, lol. such brains they don't know the difference between there, their and they're.
Just watched the latest news today! Now what? Omg. Looks like this issue was right all along
Im not touching that thing with a 40ft pole.
Your loss.
Me neither. 👍 I value my body too much.
@@doveronefoxtrot4417 If that were the case then you would want to train your immune system so that is has some in-built protection against a virus hitherto unknown in humans. In other words, you would take a vaccine.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 This is such tosh. At least 99.95% of peoples immune systems can cope already, including mine.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 Why?
Red flag! Thats all i could say! Mistakes and damaged can not be undone when it comes to your health.
No medicine or vaccine is 100% safe. Covid is a much greater threat than the tentative and probably unrelated chance of blood clots.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 no it isnt.
@@JACOPO.OFFICIEL Okay Dr. Michelini, enlighten us why, with evidence and research of course.
@@hgbnkbggj2915 no it isn't. You can avoid the virus you cannot avoid the vaccine
@@Ethan-km4lx we aren't taking anything that has zero liability .would you drive a car with no insurance ?
Perfectly safe is an oxymoron.
How can they still be saying that.
It's really quite simple. Anything new that's produced in record time with a liability disclaimer and for vast profits is bound to be at the very least suspect.
You do realise that, contractually, the AstraZeneca vaccine cannot be profitable until July this year at the very earliest? They have nothing to gain by pushing vaccines out as fast as they can now while they make no profit.
@@JackHaarriiss Sweeping statement
@@JackHaarriiss lololol bore off
@@joesmoke9624 How is that a sweeping statement? They contractually can't make a profit yet, there is no other way to twist it.
@@puglian0 He's right you idiot.
Our nanny had severe side effects from AZ. She couldn’t sleep, walk, talk for two days straight.
😱 omg how awful hope she’s ok now
@@TASIAawful1 she's ok now but who knows about the consequences. The side effects she had experienced can't be normal. Also, ambulance refused to come as they didn't know how to treat her.
@@alexkoluzh8173 Wow, that is horrible! i will not be taking the vaccine, AZ and modern and pfizer are all dangerous! they say they will all be mandatory eventually to work/buy/sell you must have the vaccine in the future! will you take it ? i wont, what will we do then though? this is pure evil
@@elsa9026 If it becomes mandatory at any point, I think it is a reason for serious protest. It will become absolutely obvious that something isn't right with this whole story. I am not going to take it as I am feeling just great, as usual. There is no answer to the question: "why should one take it if they never got sick?"
@@alexkoluzh8173 exactly, healthy people dont need it and it can even get sick from it, the unhealthy can die from it in the longterm, some people are saying its safe cus there are no short term effects, its the longterm that is the issue! people dont understand that! we must stay vigilant!
No one can possibly know if any of them are safe, no long or even medium term testing.
physiologically, there aren't going to be medium or long term effects that arent obvious developing short term
And yet vaccines have been with us a very long time now
@@worldpeace8299 exactly, vaccines take one or two doses. Drugs you take every day have way more potential for long term harm
@@chriswhittaker5075 many vaccines and medicines that took much longer to develop using tried and tested methods were then later recalled due to safety fears, nothing on this scale, all these jabs bypassed animal testing so guess who the Guinea pigs are?
@@chriswhittaker5075 you are dead wrong, you can simply stop taking the medication, you can't get unvaccinated now can you?
Why is old hospital footage being used? Regarding the overrun of Hospitals? 😔
You already know the answer, it's to twist the truth.
I’ve been bed ridden since Astra Zeneca vaccination.
Australia just banned it cause how bad it is for you sorry to hear u got it
Considering a disease with a 99.7% chance of survival, they're now saying the small proportion who are dying are nothing to worry about.
Absolute idiot.
That figure is absolutely untrue; wherever you read that was trying to mislead you. 0 people have died from taking the vaccination after many millions of doses, and the blood clotting is probably unconnected, and in line with national averages.
erm where's this data it's 99.7 SURVIVAL rate?
@@hgbnkbggj2915 Sweeping statement.
@Mike Kane Its even lower than that. People who still have covid HAVEN'T yet survived. I think this is what people get mixed up.
3yrs in .. They actually said that it might have the possibility of the blood clot 😂
And many young people have already died of heart attacks ever since due to "unknown" reasons
Why did our national broadcaster not cover the HUGE London protests and worldwide protests yesterday????
It’s because it doesn’t fit with them when there was anti lockdown protesters last year they did not broadcast them either.
They did - first item. What are you talking about?
@Elliott Wright It irks me that there are so many stupid people in this world... I have a feeling we'll lose a lot of them next winter.
I got it. My blood didn't clot. I didn't start buying microft. No microchips in it. No side effects whatsoever. Except I feel strangely less irritated by all the Windows bugs now.
I am suing AZ now
i had this yesterday and been very unwell from the side effects sickness dry mouth headache aches sweating . dont fancy the second one
Get a grip!
@@ghar7566 fuck u
Don't get a second one Janna. Still experimental
I've just had my first one too. Like you I don't know whether to have the second jab. There is so much fear mongering going on about the AZ at the moment.
@@Chris-mf4no ive also heard 7 people in uk died from the jab
This presenter is obviously a MI5/6 officer/asset
Oh yes, obviously. Because this is standard field work for them.
If there’s a more smug, condescending, sneering know it all I’m yet to know them.
My colleague, this expert, politicians, this issue, I know cause I’m a “journalist” yeah sure you do.
😂😂😂
What?! Are you on drugs or off your meds?
@@danierinash7952 do you not even consider that a possibility? You don’t think the BBC would have actors from the security services to promote govt propaganda? Really? Read “propaganda” by Edward bernays and come back to me on that one. Naive or stupid, I’m not sure? But they most certainly will as would most countries.
NEVER TAKE ANYTHING WHEN NO ONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR WHAT THEY ARE INJECTING YOU WITH.
ua-cam.com/video/3jbethXIwK0w/v-deo.html
💯
75% effective (according to the manufacturers of course) against an illness with a 99.7% recovery rate without need for experimental chemicals with unknown long term health risks
“Benefits far greater than the risks”might well be true for some categories of people but that is a very different statement from “safe and effective” certainly than “perfectly safe”.
I took this vaccine and my arm is still sore from three days ago. I couldn’t move it at all yesterday morning, I was ill yesterday night. I drank some handmade ginger, garlic, turmeric and lemon tea and felt better and the soreness has reduced and the headache as well. I’m not sure I want a second jab.
That means the vaccine's working. It's putting the virus in you so your immune system has a response and analyses it. Learnt it in biology, from a trusted source.
Exactly what they say you might expect before you are given the jab. We are back in the space of the MMR jab scare, a generation not taking that jab due to bad information then as young adults outbreaks of mumps etc making there very sick. Follow your own path not what other people tell you. Remember, the jabs are to make your body react so it recognises the virus in future so its primed to attack it so it doesn't impact you as badly should it happen. Like anything in life this is risk management.
@@davidoldham8951 lol that's what i said
@@davidoldham8951 sort of
@@slanderco. there is no virus in this vaccine...it’s mRNA.
Perfectly safe vaccine, i had shortness of breath and fevers for atleast a week! Not just me but my colleagues as well. And they never listed SOB in the expected side effects. I always have yearly vaccines and i never experienced such reactions. Some even had cellulitis on their arm. Time for them to really review this vaccine.
yea the vaccine can be pretty dangerous for young healthy people since they most likely would survive covid no problem but might get really bad cases of blood clots all over their body and die as we in Norway experienced.. only reason we were looking so much into it is because medical workers, very healthy medical workers with no problems got bad cases of blood clots and had to be treated at the hospital and one medical worker died.. they would have a higher chance of surviving covid than taking the vaccine.
Lol. That time was a couple of years ago.
When everything is Money & Political, saving lives are the least priority!
*NEWS IS FAKE. COMMENTS ARE FAKE TOO. GOVERNEMNT FAKE. CELEBS FAKE TOO. TOGETHER IN SECRET CONPIRACY*
Yup
where's the news about the protest? hahahahahaha
live on the sun tin foil kiddo
Not mentioned on this particular story? Must be a conspiracy.
They won't show it cos they're losing in mindcontrol
@@Djnffnoeosmfasjjd oh that trustworthy tabloid. :D:D
@@Djnffnoeosmfasjjd Moderna quote- Using mRNA to create medicines is a complex undertaking and requires overcoming novel scientific and technical challenges. We need to get the mRNA into the targeted tissue and cells while evading the immune system. If the immune system is triggered, the resultant response may limit protein production and, thus, limit the therapeutic benefit of mRNA medicines. We also need ribosomes to think the mRNA was produced naturally, so they can accurately read the instructions to produce the right protein. And we need to ensure the cells express enough of the protein to have the desired therapeutic effect.
Doesn't sound like your normal vaccine.
What do you think???
A national embarrassment. Oxford is supposed to make the world believe it to be one of the worlds greatest universities. When push comes to shove - it isn't!
It made a mom pass out and her child died in the bath. Working on all your addresses, make sure your kids still live and know what all of you did. You are a hate crime. Life in prison.
Bbc,any reason you are wilfully failing to report on the anti lockdown protests in London?
Any reason why you expect them to talk about the protests on a video about the vaccine? I mean, it's clearly labelled.
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 oh dear oh dear
@@slapshot0074 some heads look solid but are actually hollow inside
I had it today and it was ok to start with. But I don't feel great now. Getting pain in hands and right leg now. Don't no what they put in this vaccine.
I'm having leg spasms, its so weird
My head actually revolved around in a complete circle.. weird or what..
How do you feel now dear,is everything ok ?
I've NEVER seen the BBC analyse Boris BS with this much effort
Kasey turner died 2 weeks after taking it. In Manchester UK.
Honestly, I wonder how you people spleep at night... Do you have no conscious?!
The propaganda is on full throttle.
Absolutely
*COMMENT ACTOR PRETENDING TO OPPOSE BUT IS IN CAHOOTS WITH GOVERNENT/MEDIA/CELEBS AND MANY ORDINARY PPL.*
ASTRA (WEAPON) ZE (THAT) NECA (KILLS) ua-cam.com/video/2zoSSHx9QtA/v-deo.html & earthheroestv.com/search?search=fitts do. you notice chaos around the w0rld? look "they" are behind everyth1ng and 7 bi11ion of us are aga1nst this sup3r r1ch and the1r space pr0jects worth watching these to the end to see who they are ASTRA(WEAPON) ZE (THAT) (NECA (KILLS)
Yah-dah, yah-dah. Should have told the truth in the first place and let people make up their own minds.
What 'truth' and who is lying? And who is preventing you from making up your own mind and how?
@@danierinash7952 oh dear
"This vaccine is safe and effective in preventing COVID-19 and it's benefits continue to be far greater than it's risks." What are the risks is the question.
@@jgt_ I thinks risks and benefits need to listed clearly so that public can take an informed decision.
@@jgt_ You’re quite the regular, have you been paid to shill?? Enjoy your shekels pal.
J Thomas again, what a busy person you are. All over this comments section just like Covid. All anyone has to do Is look on the "Yellow Card" reporting system on the Goverment website. There Is loads more data available via the "office of national statistics"
Read the ONS yellow card reports, updated every Friday, scary stuff...
@@jgt_ 18 spontaneous abortions in the UK Post Pfizer jab last week, thoughts?
It's all about money that's the bottom line
And control
That's the truth.
Plus, a world cull overtime
The AstraZeneca’s not for profit. The others are.
@@pandora8478 I right
At no point even now the government or the companies advising people to eat healthy and build our immune systems.
IT'S A TRAP!
ua-cam.com/video/3jbethXIwK0s/v-deo.html
This is becoming a species selection event now, if you know what I mean.
Yep. Those who get vaccinated will live. Moronic losers who listen to conspiracy clap trap and don't get it will die off (No great loss)
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 your mad mate we won’t die we will survive my freind right to the bitter end
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 There's an old man who comes into my shop every day and buys 2 Twix. He's 95 years old and he refuses to get that poison in his arm. He said he's seen too many pricks like you in his time.
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 It's intelligent to wait for further vaccine studies, it would be 'moronic' not to
@@youneverseeanoldmaneatinga7416 Exactly! The global gene pool will be better off in the long-run...
Depopulation/Population control
I really dislike this news anchor
What do they expect when they barely tested it
*Public Health England:* "All deaths with a positive specimen (including at post-mortem) are counted *REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF DEATH!"*
The irony is, soon they might start saying, "These people died of blood clots 'with' the AZ vaccine, not 'from' the AZ vaccine"
Most people already know this. PHE published that information ages ago... That’s what initially sparked doubts about the government statistics!
We have a pandemic of heart attacks?
@Emz 3103 It's literally impossible to die from the vaxx. There are numerous news stories about young healthy people dying within 24 hours, not to mention the 1,700 deaths reported on VAERS. But last night NBC reported that nobody has died from the vaxx.
Millions are attending the CV Freedom marches all over the world today. With by far the biggest in London. And what have you seen on the BBC about the march? ZILCHO.
It's currently the third most popular story on BBC website. You're not looking very hard, are you?
@@hgbnkbggj2915 I would not be seen dead on the BBC website. I have seen nothing by them about it on YT.
@@NowisEvollovetion Then you are in a extreme minority. Many millions more people use the website than UA-cam.
We see through your lies BBC.
What lies?
@@oliverbeedham where do i start?? Maybe youre being sarcastic? Maybe try the UK Colomn, here on youtube, for some information for a start. Listen to aome doctors and scientist who are currently being censored because theyre deviating from the official narrative.
@@oliverbeedham the bcc, and most other mainstream media are propaganda, double speak machines! Try reading 1984 or Brave New World too.
All scripted and staged propaganda. 🙂
And you're here for it 👏🏻 giving them the audience they want.
Goes against the Nuremberg Protocols
Top quality journalism once again from the BBC. I wonder if they'll do a three-year update?
I'd just like to take this opportunity to say thank you to the BBC engineers who installed my gas lighting. 🙏
I also got gas ☁
@@jgt_ are you sure? I mean, did he really say that? 😉
"How doubt and suspicion are easily created" from the channel that does nothing but that.
Well said! 👍
They just don't though do they? The BBC isn't CNN or Fox. Watch either of those and you'll see what the Americans mean when they say biased media.
@@joetaylor8602 Yes they do!, they may not be so open and blatant about it, but you must have your head up your... in a dark smelly place, if you cant see it!
BBC is a propaganda arm - so you always need to filter everything through that. What is disingenous, is that they won't admit it.
Because of the economic crisis and the rate of unemployment now is the best time to invest and make money 💯
Exactly....nice words
Investing in crypto currency is one of the best chance of making money 💸
Buy gold and crypto
I wanted to trade crypto but got confused by the fluctuations in price
@@alanfernandes1035 That won't bother you if you trade with a Professional like Mr Fredrick ried
*They managed to dpdge the truth long enough to make nearly a trillion dollars.* Bravo. 😢
This hasn't aged well. Uk banned az now
The irony of the BBC highlighting PR and jingoism is hilarious
Still the commentator failed to mention the fact of %60 efficacy.
Exactly, it’s more effective than most vaccines on the planet right now
It's not 60%. It's nothing like it. Probably not even 10%.
@@blab.7688 I wouldn't give it to the rats..
Advice anyone to get a platelet count before getting a jab, theres a direct relationship between platelet count and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis
Friend nobody's asking,probing ,questioning, informing, and esp "warning you" of these things you have suggested,," blood clots= blockages= strokes= heart attacks,, nobody as ever suggested or warned me, I've had strokes,i have brain diseases etc etc,,but people"patients " are made to look silly,"oh what would you know","we are experts" we know better what's best for you
@@terencebarrett2897 And experts generally do know better. It is in the name. Of course they are human and make mistakes too.
@@worldpeace8299 it depends, there are some experts who are honestly just educated idiots who will just parrot what ever they are told to, good example neil furgason.
@@sean3874 You mean people who are called experts but are not experts? Hmmm. Or do you mean by the expression "educated idiot" that "parrots" what they are told to someone who know the truth but is telling a lie because someone else has told them to?
@@worldpeace8299 i am talking about people who dont scrutinise the official narritive or ask any questions about what the mainstream media, governments and special interest groups are pushing they basically say what they think is the truth, but they never confirm it, they have misplaced trust in people and organisations that have an agenda so their opinion is always based off their faith in what some tv expert or expert with conflicts of interest said, for example, dr fauci is the highest paid person in the us government, why has this not been investigated? and why do so many people including other experts treat what this guy says as some kind of gospel?
It is a shame the BBC do not allow an open debate about the concerns about the vaccine. Scientists with different view points would be a start.
I love how often they feel the need to have a 'scientist' say 'ah but vaccine good! vaccine good!'. Becoming a parody of itself. That first lady was spot on in the first half of her sentence though.
imagine being a leader with so much envy and jealousy towards the UK that you're willing to allow your own people to suffer... ;/
Exactly they are being petty arnt they because we won them to it the vaccine.
ASTRA (WEAPON) ZE (THAT) NECA (KILLS) ua-cam.com/video/2zoSSHx9QtA/v-deo.html & earthheroestv.com/search?search=fitts do. you notice chaos around the w0rld? look "they" are behind everyth1ng and 7 bi11ion of us are aga1nst this sup3r r1ch and the1r space pr0jects worth watching these to the end to see who they are ASTRA(WEAPON) ZE (THAT) (NECA (KILLS)
How long does it takes to develop DVT after the AstraZeneca vaccination?
How do we even know whats really in it ?
They even said in the news report that it is not a cause of DVT, this is about an exceedingly rare type of clotting in the brain which there isn’t sufficient evidence to be linked to the vaccine. If you are worried about the exceedingly rare brain blood clots these would, in theory, occur pretty much within the first few days of being vaccinated. Some countries are suggesting that if you have had a headache for 4 days after the vaccine you should go and see your doctor. Honestly this is a 1 in a million event at best. It needs to be investigated but it’s not something anyone who is thinking of getting the vaccine or who has had the vaccine already should worry about.
Between 15 -45 days if there is going to b any after effects . Tragically for some within 24 hours .
@@doveronefoxtrot4417 you look it up online or you ask a pharmacist.
@@doveronefoxtrot4417 By looking it up, doing your own research from trusted sources. Duh.
Without this pandemic all the news stations would be fkd , wall to wall repeating on all stations , same old repeats ,repeats , repeats
Plenty of shit goes down in this world to report on. For all its faults the BBC is yet to get deep into youtube conspiracy land mind fuck that its detractors take with their tea each morning.
BBC News says holidays this summer unlikely because.., wait for it...., (There is a risk!)..., is that the way we are to live our lives now, because there MIGHT be a risk?
You can shove it. I dont want DVT
This analysis can also be useful to British citizens.
In examining the data published on the website of the Istituto Superiore Sanità in Italy, it can be seen that at 1 March 2021 the number of deaths attributable to Covid was about 96,000. All the people who died were recorded as "positive" at Covid, not as dead "because" of Covid. It necessarily follows that an undetermined part of the deaths did not occur exclusively due to Covid, even if no one could deny that the Sars-cov-2 infection, together with other coexisting pathologies, may have been a contributing cause of death.
However, as regards in particular the positivity of the deceased, there are some logical inconsistencies, as emerges from the analysis carried out by the IIS itself, relating to a sample of about 6,000 medical records, evidently considered representative of the entire number of deaths positive. In fact, from the examination of these folders, it appears that:
1) In 90.4% of the records the diagnosis of hospitalization referred to conditions such as pneumonia, respiratory failure and symptoms such as fever, dyspnoea, cough, compatible with SARS-CoV-2.
2) In 600 cases, the diagnosis of hospitalization was not related to the infection;
3) In 83 cases the diagnosis of hospitalization concerned only neoplastic pathologies;
4) In 195 cases cardiovascular pathologies (for example acute myocardial infarction-AMI);
5) In 247 cases the diagnosis of hospitalization concerned other pathologies;
6) In 75 cases gastrointestinal pathologies (for example cholecystitis, intestinal perforation, intestinal obstruction, cirrhosis);
If the sample is true and completely representative, it must therefore be assumed that at least 9.6% of the deceased, even if cataloged together with the others in the IIS report, did not have to do with Covid, nor as a direct cause. nor as a contributing cause, unless it is shown that the infection occurred during hospitalization or intensive care, which until now does not appear in official data.
Not only that, if the remaining 90.4% of the deceased presented in the hospitalization diagnosis conditions and symptoms simply "compatible" with Sars-Cov-2, it is not possible to exclude that some or many of them have been hospitalized and then died precisely for pneumonia or respiratory failure due to other diseases.
Furthermore, if at the time of hospitalization the deceased people had conditions and symptoms that were simply "compatible" with Sars-Cov-2, when their "positivity" or the degeneration into a real disease of this positivity was definitively ascertained ? The only moments in which positivity and illness could be ascertained were those of hospitalization or intensive care, but this is not apparent from the examination of medical records carried out on a sample basis by the IIS.
For the above, there are good reasons to believe that a certain number of the 96,000 deaths that died positive at 1 March 2021, did not actually die from Covid.
They have to answer to the people regarding the neglect to their health.Tune in tomorrow for indepth programme WHY THE BBC HATE BRITAIN.
They don't, they have to do as they are told by Cummings.
Hey Michael. Maybe you should turn your paranoia down a notch or two.
"People tend to believe, nowadays they'll believe anything" -Mysterio (Spider man far from home)
@@JACOPO.OFFICIEL We don’t live in a multiverse you know. 😂That’s such a stupid argument. By your reasoning I should be a flat earther by now.
@@georgeholroyd7037 you are the proof my comment makes a valid point....
@@JACOPO.OFFICIEL they don’t believe your quote that says people’ll believe anything nowadays. Hmmmmm..... something tells me that quote isn’t true.
It's all politicking and it needs to stop. Both the EU and the UK. Get on with what you are paid to do. Or get out and let somebody in who can do it.
So why is it in the UK we do not have enough AstraZeneca vaccine in April? If everybody does not want AstraZeneca vaccine then why we do not have enough in the UK to jab people?
There is a tactic in marketing, and psychological manipulation based on the reaction to supply and demand. If you make something seem as though it is very desirable to others, and is in short supply....well, I'm sure you can guess the rest. It's a racket, think of 'Black Friday', and the diamond cartel.
The whole world is a show . All of us one time was fooled
Are you literally a flat earther?
@@gimblesfan4lyfe No. They are a ball earther and they know it.
not all of us, you might be fooled, but i'm not. i'm no fool like you
Takes a fool to believe the earth is flat.
I’ve had this jab
So have I, do I care about what the politicians are saying? no. people who suffered blood clots after AZ is 12 and no. of people who suffered blood clots after Phisfer is around 10. After approx. 20m vaccines being given there is no spike in blood clots. This is all fear mongering nonsense yet again from the dishonest BBC.
So have I
@Stuart Cumings That makes no sense. What wasn't tested on a virus? the AZ vaccine. 100% sure it was ... What about society and travel?? I want my old accustomed freedom. I was born with that right and I want it back. Doesn't mean you have leave the house. You are free to do as you please this is the foundation of a free democratic society and people handed it away with such ease.
Again, can you re-write your reply to make sense please?
And next you’ll be telling me the BBC don’t tell lies
They seek the truth & people listen worldwide to radio news too know what is happening in the world like Trump is a conman..
So why is the US not approving Astrazeneca?
Sounds so petty like they hate the UK it's stupid. Everyone should be joining together to get past corona it isn't a competition.
Ofcourse they do!
I just had my first shot of it. Felt crap for a day but ok now.
the not even fda approved shot, just saying , i have never and will never take medicine that isnt fda approved.
@@sean3874 Well if I die you can the satisfaction of being right then.
@@tetraquark2402 you'll be alright mate, my father got the astra/oxford vaccine and hes in good shape but he was already healthy anyways and habitually takes responsibility for his health instead of relying on big pharma conpanies to keep him alive.
You would be able to go to the hospital even if you have blood clots because you have the vaccines
I feel like at this point we know more about Covid than we do the vaccines.
What’s the difference between a conspiracy theory and reality? About 1-2 years.
Nowadays it's just months.
Poison .