It's more of a moral crime, not an unlawful one. However, during a divorce settlement, the adulterous partner should be put in a disadvantageous position
Morals are the base for law. Assault for example is illegal because it is immoral and hurts the victim of it, the same goes for Adultery. Marriage is not only a religious thing it is also a governmental contract and as such the punishment for Adultery should include a fee to pay and a loss of many privileges during the trial when it comes to the inevitable divorce.
व्यभिचार! सबके मन का विचार, खुले आम करो यार, कोई न करेगा वार, ना होगी जेल करो कितनी बार। ज़मीर पे एक लात ज़ोरदार, व्यभिचार! Some outrageous statements in the SC Judgement. Adultery is not a crime anymore but "merely" a civil dispute between 2 persons. What utter debauchery! Here's my conspiracy theory, by passing controversial & somewhat ridiculous judgements, they want SC to lose credibility as a protector of rights & undermine its efficacy in providing genuine relief to public by addressing litigation. In short reversing the phenomenon of legal & judicial activism which has until now thankfully empowered citizens & checked governments. So when it comes to Judicial appointments, politicians can say with more ferocity, look! your judges know not what they do! let us guide them. Thus ultimately politicians rule the roost.
Adultery is absolutely criminal otherwise it is as good as a vegetarian become non-vegetarian when you're are served non veg and vice versa. And in my opinion arranged marriage are likely to commit more adultery than Love marriage, because you can't arrange/fixed someone's Love but likeliness can develop in the union of couple based on wealth, caste, religion etc....
wow, 12:38 - lady says indian supreme court is a coward and is its aired in primetime show and the anchor didn't say a word to stop. Now we started bashing the supreme court too...breaking all kinds of contempt of court
Contempt of Courts Act of 1971 - section 2(c) (i) Scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court there is a law on our country for ur kind information which governs the judgement of the court from abuse or suspicion You can file a contempt case against this person and the channel for allowing this by paying Rs 130/- in the local court and hearing will be in 30 days. aab iske saada explain karna hai to aapko legal charges deena padega bhai
As a Result: As per the latest HIV estimates report (2019) of the Government, India is estimated to have around 23.49 lakh people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) in 2019.
India's law should be in Indian culture standard . It should not be copy from other country. If necessary law can rectify only giving equality to women keeping offence & crime the adultery. Otherwise not offence adultery is why become so necessary in country like India ? To whom it is more necessary.......
It should be illegal for many reasons because for some ppl it can cause a rage attack and someone can get hurt in my case I was loyal for 6 years he wasn’t helping me out with anything he cheated on me with his exe that cheated on him and I thank the lord I didn’t see them because honestly idk how I would’ve reacted after waisting 6 years expecting to have a good marriage
Can't hear anything esp., with the sound of rains here. This is the only channel which reduces the volume in the original video before uploading in the UA-cam.
if you don't fucking love your wife or husband leave them and go for somebody else if child is the problem laws should be made to provide the wife with money to support the children govt must force the husband to give money to wife for this purpose or they both should provide for children after divorce.
All women in the show are MISSING ONE VERY GRAVE POSSIBLE situation ... Which is actually a very simple logic... I promise you will agree too... Allow me to tell that .... As now section 497 is " de - creaminalised " ... In simple words it has actually lifted fear from at least significant PENALTY FEARED MEN (as earlier only married/unmarried men were being prosecuted ) that HE will not now go to jail if gets caught while having extra marital affair with a married woman .... So now these PERSIUT OF HAPPINESS attempts will increase obviously because sexual , mental need excites everyone (THE LAW was deterrent for least some PENALTY FEARED MEN ) this will increase chances of getting caught , which can in tern increase number of divorce ..... And we all agree that such UNPLANNED BROKEN MARRIAGES almost always badly affect ( FINANCIALLY , EMOTIONALLY , PSYCHOLOGICALLY etc ) all the 4 or 3 persons involved in that case .... REAL Solution of unhappy marriage is trying to solve the exact problem or getting divorce .... though many a times it's difficult to take divorce keeping in mind issues of children , old aged dependents ... Very sorry to see and surprised that THESE PERTICULAR ( EDUCATED , GOOD JOB HAVING AND SO CALLED SENSIBLE ) WOMEN TALKING ACTUALLY and unconsciously *AGAINST* AT LEAST 75% WOMEN & THE REAL SITUATION THROUGH WHICH 75% INDIAN WOMEN'S ( LESS EDUCATED ,JOBLESS , SKILL LESS ,POOR ,INHERENTLY superstitious , conservative) ARE GOING THROUGH ... But really happy all men in the show are actually speaking for 75% women ... I say both man and woman should be be prosecuted under 497... And both man and woman should have the right to file a case against his/her partner and the third person ....
You are totally right, and have illustrated well.... I feel the same thing. There will always be cases (in fact in majority) when sincere spouses will be cheated. The word cheated doesn't begin to do justice to emotional trauma suffered by the innocent spouse, god forbid even his/her children. What about the justice for them? No punishment? It's the point where humans begin relinquishing their humanity & adopt animal-like tendencies(like thousands of years ago, no). Such "freedom" is not honourable. It's evil will, not to be allowed but abhorred. How can people come to accept that shattering someone's dreams in a dishonest & vulgar manner after bonding with them in the first place is alright. It's disgusting moral fraud, a crime. If you don't have the wherewithal to mend differences in a marriage and create an amicable environment, at least get a proper divorce first. As we all have come to know by now, IPC 497 can be broken down into 2 aspects - Gender Neutrality & Criminality of Adultery. Only the former ought to have been corrected, and it should have been done long ago. The judgement text says that adultery isn't necessarily a cause for grief in marriage but may be a response to grief in marriage. Are you going to justify & let go wrongs done to innocents then? There can always be apparent explanations for such reactions to circumstances, but it has to be done in the right way. At least in theory, in a legal deterrent, a precedent. If not, then nothing matters and no law or principle need be followed, only the will of individuals. This judgement indeed has the potential to let people rip with gay abandon and complete impunity. Honest people will be made to suffer, without even a semblance of chance of punishment. Its morally and logically flawed. Massively. It sets a very bad standard, to not have any criminal punishment, only divorce or compensation. I really hope this is just a temporary situation before a proper law is created. Consider some of the rhetoric in support of this, which is available on quite a few platforms, it's pretty revealing and frankly ridiculous. 1) "No physical activity between 2 consenting persons can be considered a crime in the 21st century." Why? Whats so special about the 21st century. The Era in which u belong has nothing to do with legitimacy or otherwise of human actions. Human values are timeless & universal. Decriminalizing Adultery reveals an indiscriminate short-sightedness; it lacks wisdom. Wisdom is a virtue hidden deep inside the conscience & intellect of every individual bar none. It has to be extricated painstakingly through moral & logical reasoning. This is neither easier today nor was any harder centuries ago. One just has to withdraw a little bit from whats happening in the world and apply their own mind. 2) "Justice Chandrachud is reversing the sins of his father." Meanwhile wasn't this a unanimous judgement, which is even more startling.
I totally agree with you. This abolishment of the law will make impact very much in our society. On the other hand , it is making adultery legal . Woman are talking about right. But they are not knowing about the consequences of it. They will have to face DIVORCE in future. Be ready woman.
@@dhananjaybarman880 Actually The law and The judges never really care about honest women who's husbands indulge in extra marrital affairs and if seen critically you will know that such cases are majority in the total cases because of our highly patriarchal society ... So Earlier as well as now also the law didn't gave a chance to honest women to seek justice ...
I saw this when the torrential rains stopped & I could listen to the conversation. I feel that Nisha Khanna made a lot of sense when she said that there should be premarital counselling which the non working so called housewife mothers gave their children in the previous gen. Better still 'relationship' can be made a subject to be taught once a week without exams & marks where the students can discuss their domestic problems with a kind listener & be interactive. It was there in joint families of yore. Full marks to Nisha Khanna. At last a psychologist who is worth her salt & tells it as it is & does not speak for the gallery.
If the wall is broke or looks shabby , fix it or Rebuild it!! Instead of that ,the court demolished the entire wall and now calling it a landmark.!!😅. What landmark? Landslide.🤣, now that's what's gonna happen. 🤣🤣
achor need to improve , it feels as if she is only interested to take the talk to certain direction ( what direction i dnt know ) .. i felt she hasnt done her homework for the topic .
No one wants to be with cheating partners but everyone like to be in affairs....
Sush b exactly
Sush b
Exmp and exmla pension scheme should be stopped or else people will not go to vote
Not everyone want to go affairs out side the marriage. You can not say everyone.
@@Amit60577 haarehue netao ka pension bandh hona chahiye
It's more of a moral crime, not an unlawful one. However, during a divorce settlement, the adulterous partner should be put in a disadvantageous position
Morals are the base for law. Assault for example is illegal because it is immoral and hurts the victim of it, the same goes for Adultery. Marriage is not only a religious thing it is also a governmental contract and as such the punishment for Adultery should include a fee to pay and a loss of many privileges during the trial when it comes to the inevitable divorce.
Punishment in Islam for adultery is stoning till death
The darkest day....now divorce will happen more.
व्यभिचार! सबके मन का विचार,
खुले आम करो यार,
कोई न करेगा वार,
ना होगी जेल करो कितनी बार।
ज़मीर पे एक लात ज़ोरदार, व्यभिचार!
Some outrageous statements in the SC Judgement. Adultery is not a crime anymore but "merely" a civil dispute between 2 persons. What utter debauchery!
Here's my conspiracy theory, by passing controversial & somewhat ridiculous judgements, they want SC to lose credibility as a protector of rights & undermine its efficacy in providing genuine relief to public by addressing litigation. In short reversing the phenomenon of legal & judicial activism which has until now thankfully empowered citizens & checked governments. So when it comes to Judicial appointments, politicians can say with more ferocity, look! your judges know not what they do! let us guide them. Thus ultimately politicians rule the roost.
Absolutely man... New angle ... But very logical one .... What do you think about my main comment ...
Adultery is absolutely criminal otherwise it is as good as a vegetarian become non-vegetarian when you're are served non veg and vice versa.
And in my opinion arranged marriage are likely to commit more adultery than Love marriage, because you can't arrange/fixed someone's Love but likeliness can develop in the union of couple based on wealth, caste, religion etc....
koliikho ko
Exmp and exmla pension scheme should be stopped or else people will not go to vote
koliikho ko, You just nailed it.
dnt do marriage..do love
Your idea of arranged marriage is wrong 🤦♂️🤦♂️
Arranged marriage doesnt mean ladjka dekhe and agle mahine shaadi.
Adultery must be a crime or else no other law makes sense
wow, 12:38 - lady says indian supreme court is a coward and is its aired in primetime show and the anchor didn't say a word to stop.
Now we started bashing the supreme court too...breaking all kinds of contempt of court
Anil s I dont know what she is thinking. She does not sound much informed or educated either
Contempt of Courts Act of 1971 - section 2(c)
(i) Scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to lower the authority of, any court
there is a law on our country for ur kind information which governs the judgement of the court from abuse or suspicion
You can file a contempt case against this person and the channel for allowing this by paying Rs 130/- in the local court and hearing will be in 30 days.
aab iske saada explain karna hai to aapko legal charges deena padega bhai
Anil s
Exmp and exmla pension scheme should be stopped or else people will not go to vote
Sujith Subramanian
Exmp and exmla pension scheme should be stopped or else people will not go to vote
anyone supporting adultery is stupid supreme court lost respect in this
People should make sure that they don't get caught while having an affair.
I do think adultery should be illegal. Obviously. Homewreckers and adulterers
It is a crime anchor mam...adultery is not for soothing someone's need. It's a cheating n theft of personal relationship wid ur spouse
As a Result:
As per the latest HIV estimates report (2019) of the Government, India is estimated to have around 23.49 lakh people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHIV) in 2019.
India's law should be in Indian culture standard . It should not be copy from other country. If necessary law can rectify only giving equality to women keeping offence & crime the adultery. Otherwise not offence adultery is why become so necessary in country like India ? To whom it is more necessary.......
Why adultery is a private decision? Then why did u got married
What the hell... SC is having problem only when we demand death panelty to rapist on ban on alcohol....
Total disappointment
NDTV present british culture. Shame shame shame shame
It should be illegal for many reasons because for some ppl it can cause a rage attack and someone can get hurt in my case I was loyal for 6 years he wasn’t helping me out with anything he cheated on me with his exe that cheated on him and I thank the lord I didn’t see them because honestly idk how I would’ve reacted after waisting 6 years expecting to have a good marriage
Please allow guest to talk and not anchor to disturb them in every second
Ryt
now in india ....children will never gat to know thier fathers..
In short sc is saying marriage is also a choice so dont get married 😂😂😂
Can't hear anything esp., with the sound of rains here. This is the only channel which reduces the volume in the original video before uploading in the UA-cam.
if you don't fucking love your wife or husband leave them and go for somebody else if child is the problem laws should be made to provide the wife with money to support the children govt must force the husband to give money to wife for this purpose or they both should provide for children after divorce.
Supreem court MAKING Randi.
All women in the show are MISSING ONE VERY GRAVE POSSIBLE situation ... Which is actually a very simple logic... I promise you will agree too...
Allow me to tell that ....
As now section 497 is " de - creaminalised " ... In simple words it has actually lifted fear from at least significant PENALTY FEARED MEN (as earlier only married/unmarried men were being prosecuted )
that HE will not now go to jail if gets caught while having extra marital affair with a married woman .... So now these PERSIUT OF HAPPINESS attempts will increase obviously because sexual , mental need excites everyone (THE LAW was deterrent for least some PENALTY FEARED MEN ) this will increase chances of getting caught , which can in tern increase number of divorce ..... And we all agree that such UNPLANNED BROKEN MARRIAGES almost always badly affect ( FINANCIALLY , EMOTIONALLY , PSYCHOLOGICALLY etc ) all the 4 or 3 persons involved in that case ....
REAL Solution of unhappy marriage is trying to solve the exact problem or getting divorce .... though many a times it's difficult to take divorce keeping in mind issues of children , old aged dependents ...
Very sorry to see and surprised that THESE PERTICULAR
( EDUCATED , GOOD JOB HAVING AND SO CALLED SENSIBLE )
WOMEN TALKING ACTUALLY and unconsciously *AGAINST* AT LEAST 75% WOMEN & THE REAL SITUATION THROUGH WHICH 75% INDIAN WOMEN'S ( LESS EDUCATED ,JOBLESS , SKILL LESS ,POOR ,INHERENTLY superstitious , conservative) ARE GOING THROUGH ...
But really happy all men in the show are actually speaking for 75% women ...
I say both man and woman should be be prosecuted under 497... And both man and woman should have the right to file a case against his/her partner and the third person ....
You are totally right, and have illustrated well.... I feel the same thing. There will always be cases (in fact in majority) when sincere spouses will be cheated. The word cheated doesn't begin to do justice to emotional trauma suffered by the innocent spouse, god forbid even his/her children. What about the justice for them? No punishment? It's the point where humans begin relinquishing their humanity & adopt animal-like tendencies(like thousands of years ago, no). Such "freedom" is not honourable. It's evil will, not to be allowed but abhorred. How can people come to accept that shattering someone's dreams in a dishonest & vulgar manner after bonding with them in the first place is alright. It's disgusting moral fraud, a crime. If you don't have the wherewithal to mend differences in a marriage and create an amicable environment, at least get a proper divorce first.
As we all have come to know by now, IPC 497 can be broken down into 2 aspects - Gender Neutrality & Criminality of Adultery. Only the former ought to have been corrected, and it should have been done long ago.
The judgement text says that adultery isn't necessarily a cause for grief in marriage but may be a response to grief in marriage. Are you going to justify & let go wrongs done to innocents then? There can always be apparent explanations for such reactions to circumstances, but it has to be done in the right way. At least in theory, in a legal deterrent, a precedent. If not, then nothing matters and no law or principle need be followed, only the will of individuals.
This judgement indeed has the potential to let people rip with gay abandon and complete impunity. Honest people will be made to suffer, without even a semblance of chance of punishment. Its morally and logically flawed. Massively. It sets a very bad standard, to not have any criminal punishment, only divorce or compensation. I really hope this is just a temporary situation before a proper law is created.
Consider some of the rhetoric in support of this, which is available on quite a few platforms, it's pretty revealing and frankly ridiculous. 1) "No physical activity between 2 consenting persons can be considered a crime in the 21st century." Why? Whats so special about the 21st century. The Era in which u belong has nothing to do with legitimacy or otherwise of human actions. Human values are timeless & universal. Decriminalizing Adultery reveals an indiscriminate short-sightedness; it lacks wisdom. Wisdom is a virtue hidden deep inside the conscience & intellect of every individual bar none. It has to be extricated painstakingly through moral & logical reasoning. This is neither easier today nor was any harder centuries ago. One just has to withdraw a little bit from whats happening in the world and apply their own mind.
2) "Justice Chandrachud is reversing the sins of his father." Meanwhile wasn't this a unanimous judgement, which is even more startling.
I totally agree with you. This abolishment of the law will make impact very much in our society. On the other hand , it is making adultery legal .
Woman are talking about right. But they are not knowing about the consequences of it. They will have to face DIVORCE in future. Be ready woman.
@@dhananjaybarman880
Actually The law and The judges never really care about honest women who's husbands indulge in extra marrital affairs and if seen critically you will know that such cases are majority in the total cases because of our highly patriarchal society ... So Earlier as well as now also the law didn't gave a chance to honest women to seek justice ...
I saw this when the torrential rains stopped & I could listen to the conversation. I feel that Nisha Khanna made a lot of sense when she said that there should be premarital counselling which the non working so called housewife mothers gave their children in the previous gen. Better still 'relationship' can be made a subject to be taught once a week without exams & marks where the students can discuss their domestic problems with a kind listener & be interactive. It was there in joint families of yore. Full marks to Nisha Khanna. At last a psychologist who is worth her salt & tells it as it is & does not speak for the gallery.
If the wall is broke or looks shabby , fix it or Rebuild it!! Instead of that ,the court demolished the entire wall and now calling it a landmark.!!😅. What landmark? Landslide.🤣, now that's what's gonna happen. 🤣🤣
Can the moderator please let the speakers talk?
wow, Gargi for we the people, that's refreshing.
Although I agree with what the anchor stood for, she could have been a little patient while listening to the panelists.
Gargi 😘😘😘😘❤️😍😍😍
achor need to improve , it feels as if she is only interested to take the talk to certain direction ( what direction i dnt know ) .. i felt she hasnt done her homework for the topic .
How can you charge someone and can tell anyone to whom you want to share your bed with
Just make laws as u r referring country hv then u will se this women hypocrisy
Kamal farukhi is Right.
Femanism pagla gya hin.......
Etc etc🙂
Rohit has british culture, shame shame shame