I've Been Teaching Screenwriting For 25 Years... Here Are The Most Common Mistakes - Matthew Kalil

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 лип 2024
  • BUY THE BOOK - THE THREE WELLS OF SCREENWRITING: Discover Your Deep Sources Of Inspiration - amzn.to/34kbPaP
    Matthew Kalil is a writer, director, script editor, author and speaker. He has written and co-written over 40 produced episodes of TV and has received various grants, development funding and awards. Matthew’s productions have been screened and broadcast in Canada, Denmark, Morocco, New Zealand, Puerto Rico, Kenya, South Africa, Thailand, the United States and the United Kingdom. Since receiving his MA in Screenwriting, he has been teaching, writing and mentoring students for over 20 years. Matthew has developed a unique system of screenwriting theory that helps beginners as well as established screenwriters get in touch with their creative core. His book, The Three Wells of Screenwriting, published by Michael Wiese productions with a foreword by Christopher Vogler, has been describes as a “breakthrough in the writing craft.” His workshops have touched and inspired thousands of participants and his gentle and insightful script editing guidance has helped many writers realize the stories they were always trying to tell. A charismatic speaker, Matthew has enjoyed presenting many times at the London Screenwriting Festival, the Cape Town International Animation Festival and the University Film and Video Association. Matthew is currently an Assistant Professor at the David Lynch MFA in screenwriting in the USA.
    MORE VIDEOS WITH MATTHEW KALIL
    bit.ly/2kMqz05
    CONNECT WITH MATTHEW KALIL
    matthewkalil.com
    CONNECT WITH THE THREE WELLS OF SCREENWRITING
    thethreewells.com
    / the_three_wells
    / the3wells
    / thethreewells
    VIEWERS ALSO WATCHED
    Only Thing Writers Need To Know About Plot - • Only Thing Writers Nee...
    99% Of Screenwriters Make This Mistake When They Begin - • 99% Of Screenwriters M...
    Most Common Mistakes Screenwriters Make In Act 1 - • Most Common Mistakes S...
    7 Deadly Mistakes Screenwriters Make - • 7 Deadly Mistakes Scre...
    27 Dialogue Mistakes - • 27 Dialogue Mistakes
    PERSONALLY SPONSOR FILM COURAGE
    ko-fi.com/filmcourage
    CONNECT WITH FILM COURAGE
    www.FilmCourage.com
    #!/FilmCourage
    / filmcourage
    / filmcourage
    / filmcourage
    / filmcourage
    SUBSCRIBE TO THE FILM COURAGE UA-cam CHANNEL
    bit.ly/18DPN37
    SUPPORT FILM COURAGE BY BECOMING A MEMBER
    / @filmcourage
    SUPPORT FILM COURAGE BY BECOMING A PATRON
    / filmcourage
    LISTEN TO THE FILM COURAGE PODCAST
    / filmcourage-com
    (Affiliates)
    SCRIVENER FREE TRIAL
    tinyurl.com/43uuumc6
    ►WE USE THIS CAMERA (B&H) - buff.ly/3rWqrra
    ►WE USE THIS SOUND RECORDER (AMAZON) - amzn.to/2tbFlM9
    Stuff we use:
    LENS - Most people ask us what camera we use, no one ever asks about the lens which filmmakers always tell us is more important. This lens was a big investment for us and one we wish we could have made sooner. Started using this lens at the end of 2013 - amzn.to/2tbtmOq
    AUDIO
    Rode VideoMic Pro - The Rode mic helps us capture our backup audio. It also helps us sync up our audio in post amzn.to/425k5rG
    Audio Recorder - If we had to do it all over again, this is probably the first item we would have bought - amzn.to/3WEuz0k
    LIGHTS - Although we like to use as much natural light as we can, we often enhance the lighting with this small portable light. We have two of them and they have saved us a number of times - amzn.to/2u5UnHv
    *These are affiliate links, by using them you can help support this channel.
    #writing #screenwriting #writer
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 59

  • @filmcourage
    @filmcourage  21 день тому +11

    Do any of these mistakes ring true for you?

    • @SashaYery
      @SashaYery 21 день тому

      📚📝🤔 I've certainly over explained.

    • @EasyZee69
      @EasyZee69 21 день тому

      I definitely make this mistake all the time, being to vague. Like, INT. HOUSE. DAY. or a man walks into the room. This interview has changed my writing starting right now, I am reworking my current script to fit his advise.

    • @MrXlee1967
      @MrXlee1967 20 днів тому +1

      Can we have you the interviewer give your best tips that you have learnt over the years? Really liked your input. And his advice was really good to. Even for someone who wants to write novels.

    • @andrewpearson5504
      @andrewpearson5504 14 днів тому

      Not a one.

  • @bigdaddygrim250
    @bigdaddygrim250 21 день тому +30

    The big three he mentions:
    1. No such thing as a "House". (Be a bit more specific in your descriptions of things and people but don't overdo it. Enough to activate the camera in the minds eye but be brief.)
    2. The introduction of your characters should give enough information to aid in casting them. (Your description should capture the 'spirit' of the character and means something very different to a casting agent than to a regular reader.)
    3. The order that we read is the order that we see. (Set scenes and Reveal information with the understanding that all of this is new to a reader and they can't know about anything until you've told them it exists. Finding a fun and interesting way to reveal such is up to you.)

    • @paulpena5040
      @paulpena5040 21 день тому

      1 is b.s. a house is just a house. Let the set designer do their job. Unless it's important to the plot don't try to do other peoples' work. 2. Is good. 3.

    • @otakurocklee
      @otakurocklee 20 днів тому

      @@paulpena5040 Yeah, that's what I've heard as well. Not sure why we need to know the type of tree or type of house if it isn't related to the story.

  • @lonjohnson5161
    @lonjohnson5161 21 день тому +26

    This one might be worth coming back to from time to time.

    • @filmcourage
      @filmcourage  21 день тому +2

      Nothing wrong with that! Cheers Lon!

  • @Lithilic
    @Lithilic 21 день тому +8

    I'm more of a novel writer but I like to see what I can glean from screenplay writing, especially with how to be more direct with descriptions.

    • @filmcourage
      @filmcourage  20 днів тому +3

      We have a new video with a novelist going up tonight at 5pm PST.

  • @wexwuthor1776
    @wexwuthor1776 21 день тому +9

    Lots of new faces. Film Courage is on the grind. 💪🏾💪🏾💪🏾

  • @doityourself949
    @doityourself949 21 день тому +4

    Checks latest script “int bedroom late afternoon”. Damn, he was right. Great video and great tips.

  • @ilovefilm2
    @ilovefilm2 21 день тому +5

    He’s a great teacher!

  • @dramastudiobordeaux8058
    @dramastudiobordeaux8058 19 днів тому +1

    His point about the house is important. Think about the two chairs in the montage at the beginning of the Pixar movie UP. The description of the chairs is essential into conveying ideas - visually and implicitly, who that couple were, the type of people they were and the dynamic of their relationship. Thats really good storytelling. The montage was a film all by itself.

  • @ratemyactors
    @ratemyactors 20 днів тому

    Loved this video! As an aspiring screenwriter, I found Matthew's advice and insights to be incredibly valuable. It's reassuring to know that even experienced writers like myself are prone to common mistakes. Can't wait to dive into his book, The Three Wells of Screenwriting, for more guidance and inspiration. Thanks for sharing your expertise, Matthew!

  • @LeviathantheMighty
    @LeviathantheMighty 20 днів тому +3

    Good info! Thanks!

  • @matthewlavagna6080
    @matthewlavagna6080 21 день тому +3

    Be visually descriptive while using the minimum amount of words.

  • @mrdsjenzie
    @mrdsjenzie 21 день тому +2

    so i'm writing out my first draft script, and i'm experimenting somewhat on the sluglines... EXT. CHARACTER'S HOUSE, and then some info on it; not the whole house; just the rooms in it, and editing it as i go. establish who's house... and there's your anchor. yeah descriptive of the location doesn't have to be a lot, just what is needed for the reader. also if you've already established the location, i'm not continually telling it's in that general location, just the specific location, maybe even the time of the day as well.
    i've not fully detailed some of my main characters, except one, putting in VERY specific things about what they are wearing. to guide and waypoint the reader as to who it is, but it can also be mysterious or unknown, for the time in the story. as for descriptive in character eg "they are like something", i am NOT doing that, just superfluous info for me. for now, apart from any descriptive of the character, parenthesizing their AGE and GENDER... even if it's obvious. anything like that has to have a follow through, in order to have importance.
    yes, describe the SCENE as fully as possible, that's what i didn't at the start, trying to keep things mysterious. and have each character already mentioned too. what you described are BACKGROUND (B), MEDIUM (M) and FOREGROUND (F) details. but that second example of the order wouldn't work, that would be F then B, and that's not logical in terms of shot progression. example being HOUSE OF GAMES, where Margaret arrives at the aforementioned place and looks at the neon sign, and it's shot progression was slightly off, just switching two shots would have made more logical IMO. using the BMF method (tm😅) brings the reader into the story better, instead of jumping around... IMO. you are writing a SCRIPT not a SCREENPLAY, establish what is in the scene.
    the new element of the example (the thousand dollar shoes) is still foreground.
    learning as i type it down, it's all learning.
    look at me with the big words
    first time i've replied to film courage, but i've watched quite a few of your vids, been excellent so far!

    • @filmcourage
      @filmcourage  21 день тому +1

      Cheers! Good stuff. Thanks for posting!

  • @Darfaultner
    @Darfaultner 21 день тому +1

    I feel as though this is the first video on UA-cam that has focused on action lines. I've been asking for this for years. Awesome. Thank you... But more please :D

    • @filmcourage
      @filmcourage  20 днів тому

      Here's another one - ua-cam.com/video/rXz0DTX3db0/v-deo.html

  • @user-zd1jh5zz9n
    @user-zd1jh5zz9n 5 днів тому +2

    Wow! Very very good.

  • @katyavictoriajoy
    @katyavictoriajoy 21 день тому +2

    Wonderful information….Thank you Matthew✨

  • @lonjohnson5161
    @lonjohnson5161 21 день тому +4

    I have a writing problem and I'm asking for advice. I have a character who is seen several times by the protagonist, but she never speaks and is barely aware of the protagonist. Do I introduce her on the first page she appears with a generic name like FEMALE STUDENT along with a few words about her character or should I introduce her briefly as a female student and many pages later give a better description of JANE DOE, the female student, just before she speaks?
    I am open to any suggestions for formatting. Thanks.

    • @aarkmish8087
      @aarkmish8087 21 день тому +2

      I think the first one imo. [Requesting others to please reply to this too].
      Later on, more description can be added to her as plot unravels.

    • @mrdsjenzie
      @mrdsjenzie 21 день тому +1

      first time she appears, full name in CAPITALS. what she is is her descript

    • @Lithilic
      @Lithilic 21 день тому +2

      I think it entirely depends on how important the character is to the protagonist. If she's pretty or eye-catching in some way and the protagonist wants to know this person more, then give a first page description to reflect that the protagonist notices her. If she's not that important add the description before she speaks, throwing in something like "I've noticed her here and there before. She normally doesn't say much..." etc.

    • @eugenetswong
      @eugenetswong 21 день тому +1

      I'm not an expert. I'm trying to learn.
      I suggest just writing both, and then choosing when you are almost finished editing.

  • @mjames-ll2ct
    @mjames-ll2ct 16 днів тому

    in writing my pilot script, i have been drawing out locations because it's going to be 2D animation, the main location is a school and i want to look a neglected, somewhat underfunded so i started off made the floors a bit untidy and dusty
    but it's still useful for me to give an effective description of a room for example, because it helps "paint a picture" so to speak, in that it can be a way to convey information to the reader of the script and ultimately the viewer
    i need to learn how to do this for the main characters now lol, it seems choosing the right words is an artform in itself,

  • @mmoan2
    @mmoan2 15 днів тому

    I’ve tried very hard to make sure all of the details are relevant to the story. For example, don’t say a tree… maybe a stunted tree. But why a stunted tree? Is it a comedy featuring an out-of-luck botanist. An enigmatically unkempt house?
    In short, the “No such thing as a house” rule always haunts me because, as he said, I assume the audience can see the story with me. I try to use this urge as an opportunity to add personality that supports the story.

  • @DexterMorgan-sd4jx
    @DexterMorgan-sd4jx 21 день тому +1

    He's a very good teacher, without a doubt I'm going to revisit this video again to study.
    But I disagree with him about the description of the house.
    You should describe the protagonist's house, because it tells about the protagonist's taste and his/her social status.
    Though, you don't have to describe each house of each character, mainly if they are supporting characters.
    I read the oscar nominated screenplay "Babel" by Guillermo Arriaga.
    He sometimes describes the houses and sometimes doesn't.
    For example, in that screenplay there's a mexican woman who takes care of 2 american children:
    int. t.v. room. L.A. house - night
    In the action lines, Arriaga doesn't describe the house.
    You already know that those kids are from an upper middle class family, if their parents can afford a mexican nany and also living in L.A.
    He describes the houses in Morocco, Mexico and Japan because are exotic places

  • @kuramobay2445
    @kuramobay2445 21 день тому +1

    Screenwriting is telling a story to create emotions in the reader that will translate to the screen. If the location is not relevant to the story beyond its practical purpose then what's the point of being specific? Is it not better for the director to know that it's not a particular kind of house and he can choose whatever he prefers or whatever the budget will allow. I just have little patience for people who nitpick and present personal foibles as essential to the work. This only happens in screenwriting. All the other crafts are BS proof. When Roger Deakins or other great DPs talks about cinematography there's never any dogma involved. It's all about expression and communicating intentions.

  • @dramastudiobordeaux8058
    @dramastudiobordeaux8058 19 днів тому +1

    The writers on the Acolyte (Star Wars) need to hire you for some basic - and I mean basic - classes in screenwriting...... I mean, how did those people get hired in the first place........

  • @AlexKurilovMusic
    @AlexKurilovMusic 18 днів тому

    The last point about symbols is also huge. It's so tempting to be obscure and expect the audience to figure out your intention in this sort of "aaah i get it i get" sort of way. Because it strokes your ego a bit as a creator, and you don't want to give away some deep meaning that you purposefully hidden underneath. But it's important to remember that it's only the best works of art earn that kind of attention of analysis. But before that, you need to create something that will catch attention by itself.
    Lots of scholars probably overanalysed Lord of the Rings and its deeper meanings of devastation of war etc, but it became so popular as it was because it was an imaginative and immersive story first and foremost.

  • @SugarRushTimes2030-gs3qp
    @SugarRushTimes2030-gs3qp 21 день тому +1

    💯

  • @winterwolfsden
    @winterwolfsden 19 днів тому

    I'm curious why "never met a steak he didn't like" isn't a valid character description but "looks like he carries the weight of his world on his shoulders" is. They both conjure a certain "image" and seem like they could even work in tandem.

  • @BA_SO_BA_NE
    @BA_SO_BA_NE 21 день тому

    Is there any channel from you which focus only on the written Novel and everything about it?

    • @filmcourage
      @filmcourage  20 днів тому

      Here are some novelists who we have interviewed - ua-cam.com/video/rQI-XnJgF0s/v-deo.html

  • @quboqut
    @quboqut 19 днів тому

    ye

  • @message_service
    @message_service 21 день тому +2

    🌞👍

  • @BlueBasement66
    @BlueBasement66 21 день тому +1

    🫡🫡🫡

  • @ali773n
    @ali773n 21 день тому

    I HATE how hot he is😂😂😂

  • @lukedalunaticthetruthwitlu9974
    @lukedalunaticthetruthwitlu9974 21 день тому +1

    I'm working on A screenplay I'm working on a kid's cartoon. I also have a reality TV show to pitch. I just need the help being creative is not hard easy for me. If I can get some help. I can make us some money. 💯

    • @patricksleep9787
      @patricksleep9787 21 день тому +6

      Do you really think people are gonna help you just like that?

    • @formulaic78
      @formulaic78 21 день тому

      ​@@patricksleep9787yes, he does. He will learn.

  • @andrewpearson5504
    @andrewpearson5504 14 днів тому

    This is all so basic. Really reminds you how just about everyone thinks he or she can be a screenwriter.

  • @jbchannel88
    @jbchannel88 21 день тому

    Is he writing a new book?

  • @henrycase3788
    @henrycase3788 21 день тому

    Gonna be honest, chief. The advices are sound, but I looked up this dude and I dont see any notable screenwriting work for movies & television. Maybe the info isnt up to date and/or he focuses more on theatre, but... eh. It's a shrug from me.

    • @filmcourage
      @filmcourage  20 днів тому +3

      Matthew's credits may be a little harder to find as he worked in the South African film industry.

  • @dustinalbright5012
    @dustinalbright5012 21 день тому

    Those who can’t do, teach

    • @formulaic78
      @formulaic78 21 день тому +3

      Isn't the statistic something like 10% of published authors make 90% of the money? Clearly there is room for less successful but still talented (have you seen how bad some of the successful stuff produced by working writers is) writers to educate others on the craft who may go on to have more commercial success than the teacher has had. You may also find that teachers also work as consultants. Also, think of football. How many average players have become amazing managers? Quite a few.

    • @Ruylopez778
      @Ruylopez778 21 день тому

      Garry Winogrand taught photography at college level in the 70s to support himself and his family, despite being an established and highly regarded freelance photographer. Even today he is widely known within the photography community as being one of the greatest ever alongside other legends of the craft. I would pity anyone who would dismiss Winogrand's wisdom, work or technique. YMMV

    • @LeviathantheMighty
      @LeviathantheMighty 20 днів тому

      Look at most of what Disney is putting out. They're not teaching and they definitely can't write a story or make a show or movie that appeals to more than 3% of the population.
      I trust this guy more than hollywoke or Disney.

    • @dustinalbright5012
      @dustinalbright5012 20 днів тому

      @@Ruylopez778 cool if I’m ever interested in photography I’ll try to remember that and look him up