Prof, can you please elaborate further on your programme re Order 37 for the recovery of money with a summary procedure, e.g., if you filed a commercial suit without actually mentioning Order 37, but explaining everything else, e.g., the precise amount of capital that was invested in a trust account and is repatriable along with the accrued interest at the rate of interest as agreed and paid in the past plus the costs of the suit and interest, continuously occurring and constantly acruing till the satisfaction of the decretal amount in toto, but now you want it to be switched to the commercial court cos the issues have still not been framed and you intend to do it before all this actually happens. I mean is it rightfully possible and lawfully interchangeable.
Prof, can you prepare a lecture on this topic, e.g., "are privately practising lawyers really officers of the court; therefore, part of the judicature cos they are always referred to and treated as such by the administration of justice system, or they are simply individuals who are just spectators like their clients or other litigants and have no special privileges in the courts and are without any professional obligations to the courts within the courts' premises or outside of it. There are many occasions where the lawyers are penalised by the presiding judges for neglecting their lawful duties to the administration of justice system, e.g., reckless disregard for the truth, i.e., duty of candour.
Very informative and helpful
Heartedly Thankful dear sir
AOA SIR before hearing objections petition court is bound to comply order 21 rule 23/A is mandatory to furnish security
Prof, can you please elaborate further on your programme re Order 37 for the recovery of money with a summary procedure, e.g., if you filed a commercial suit without actually mentioning Order 37, but explaining everything else, e.g., the precise amount of capital that was invested in a trust account and is repatriable along with the accrued interest at the rate of interest as agreed and paid in the past plus the costs of the suit and interest, continuously occurring and constantly acruing till the satisfaction of the decretal amount in toto, but now you want it to be switched to the commercial court cos the issues have still not been framed and you intend to do it before all this actually happens. I mean is it rightfully possible and lawfully interchangeable.
Prof, can you prepare a lecture on this topic, e.g., "are privately practising lawyers really officers of the court; therefore, part of the judicature cos they are always referred to and treated as such by the administration of justice system, or they are simply individuals who are just spectators like their clients or other litigants and have no special privileges in the courts and are without any professional obligations to the courts within the courts' premises or outside of it. There are many occasions where the lawyers are penalised by the presiding judges for neglecting their lawful duties to the administration of justice system, e.g., reckless disregard for the truth, i.e., duty of candour.
Please make a topic over Or.21 rule 58
AOA SIR HOW ARE YOU sir plz deliver a lacture on consent decree EXECUTABLE thanks GOD bless you
Hello sir if the objection dismess then they field appeal but how much chance the accept appeal in uper court
good lecture sir. I am your fan. u r style is zaberdast. plz deliver detailed lecture on 12(2) cpc
Ajmal Farooq Mohal Advocate plz see 12 (2) is discussed earlier
+Law Lectures by saleem Yaqoob AHC sir family law 1964 family law bata dain details main
I want to cantact you sir about my father's case
Pehlay cha pee lay