How US Will DESTROY Russia After Putin Uses Nuclear Weapons
Вставка
- Опубліковано 26 кві 2024
- Go to ground.news/militaryshow to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
🌍🚀 In a geopolitical chess game, Russia's nuclear threats in Ukraine have the world on edge. With setbacks and U.S. politics influencing the narrative, Europe may bolster support for Ukraine, challenging Russia's stance. Imagine a world where Western military support empowers Ukraine against Russian aggression. Dive into the intricate dance of warfare, politics, and the looming nuclear shadow, where the stakes couldn't be higher. #GlobalPolitics #NuclearThreat #UkraineCrisis #MilitaryStrategy🔥#europe #NATO #russia #ukraine #ukrainewar #militaryanalysis #militarytech #geopolitics
#themilitaryshow - Наука та технологія
Go to ground.news/militaryshow to stay fully informed. Subscribe through my link for 40% off unlimited access this month.
And why should USA retaliate against Russia for nuking Ukraine ? Why ? Has ukraine signed a defense pact with america ? US will also get nuked to oblivion if they decide to engage in nuclear war with Russia.. Why should the americans risk nuclear war for the sake of an eastern European backwater ?
🖕🫵
Stop spreading fake news, the US will not nuke Russia for using nukes in Ukraine. Ukraine does not hold enough strategic importance to the US to risk US cities being vaporized by a Russian strike. That is the whole point of nuclear deterrence. The US therefore does not / will not face Russia in a conflict directly, only through proxies in limited means. If Russia uses nukes against a NATO state, that is a different conversation.
"Fully informed"?? The only people who might be "fully informed" (as it pertains to the US Military) are the senior Generals and Admirals in the US High Command as well as certain key individuals in the Federal Government (such as the President and Secretary of Defence). As for the rest of us (this also includes "wannabe armchair and video game experts"), all we can do is guess at best.
americans in 2024: was nuking japan justified to end the war faster? yes
same americans if Russians ever start to think like them: WTF thats craaazy
"I don't know what weapons World War 3 will be fought with, but the UA-cam comment section will be full of people who think they are smart because they can quote Albert Einstein."
"I pooped my pants" - Albert Einstein, age 4
I applaud your pettiness 👏 it is something to behold.
@@anonym1984or some guy named Joe age 81
@@mr.monitor. Why don't you just go to Russia now?
@@mr.monitor. No but we have a lot of witness testimony claiming that DJT wears a diaper and freely unloads his bowls during meetings and other times. DJT also wears a man-girdle.
These type of headlines are the same since 2022...😅
And you want to keep that way.... you dont want to say ever: "he really did it"
Why shouldn't they be? They'll probably be the same in 2025 as well.
Still true though.
Russia has been losing the war on the internet since the war started
Because russia has been threatening the world with nuclear war non stop since 2022.
China’s primary fear of Nuclear escalation is they are immediately down wind. 😂
This is why Turkey was denied the F35
US recently said that Turkiye could have F35 planes if it wants to so they started to negotiate the terms again. Moreover, US has already approved 40 units of latest F16 jets and 80 units of F16 upgrade kits for existing fleet of Turkiye.
In addition to that Turkiye has also managed to produce domestically its own fighter jet called "KAAN" and "HURJET".
Because it could be remotely disabled by the USA to ensure it was only used in circumstances explicitly approved by the USA
@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044sandbox guy says that the code thing isn't real
@@charlesburgoyne-probyn6044 you enjoy your charades eh.
@@joshjessicaolson-wg9xb it's the software much like how a Tesla car is controlled
They would likely respond by announcing that Putin had died of a stroke.
He needed democracy.
“If WW3 is fought with nuclear weapons, then WW4 will be fought with bows and arrows” - Prince Charles, now King Charles 3.
Buck Turgidson: "I'm not saying we won't get our hair mussed..."
I understood that reference! I do!
@@kyleparish-aaron5764 20-30 million, tops...
@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks.
"Gentlemen you can't fight here...this is the War Room!!!"
@@Christmas-dg5xc depending on the breaks!
USA wont risk New York for Kyiv.
Will Russia risk Moscow for Ukraine? Don't forget the weapons Russia has the west also has and better.
Will Russia risk St. Petersburg, Moscow, and Vladivostok? This goes both ways comrade.
Love the A-10. The thing about fighter aircraft is that you expect them to be cool, and they look as fast as they are. The A-10 no beauty queen, but it is one of the most badass aircraft ever made.
Someday soon we will wish we had 10,000 A-10s. The fools want to retire them. WW2 was all about quantity.
@@peternorthrup6274 Well that's two different things but related. I believe that in 1939 that both Europe, and the US had no idea what the US could accomplish in WW2, and the results by 1945 were utterly amazing. The A-10 has to be the most kick-ass ground support, and assault aircraft ever. I'm not sure how 10K of them would be used however. I once read where Herman Goering once tried to conquer some part of northern France using only the Luftwaffe - no ground troops. It was complete failure.
The force multiplier effect can easily overwhelm the enemy even just by using conventional weapons. The enemy would be attacked from many directions all weather , day , night, stealth and with conventional air superiority it would be all over in 24 hours .
'you always have a plan before you get punched in the face"
I second that from a guy who been in a real fight and not on a keyboard on UA-cam.
24 hrs? It took a month just to bring down Iraq's defenses during Desert Storm
YUPP!! And Iraq was a piece of cake while Afghanistan was a stroll in the garden. Also Iran was supposed to be as easy to flip as a pancake. How did all that turn out for y'all, huh?
@@wahyuindrasto8307 Don't get carried away. Iran might be formidable within their borders but outside they are not. Their recent attack on Israel was a joke.
The first move in any war between Russia and NATO is, NATO would most likely seize Kaliningrad
and so what sherlock
Why is Russia against NATO?
Maybe then at least Russia, China and Iran are against NATO.
This will be fair. Although no... Entire NATO doesn't have enough strength even to defeat Russia....economically, lol.
@@avadhutagita3741 That we do not send many weapon systems to Ukraine for fear of them being too overpowered for Russia to hold the line against and Russia resorting to nukes makes it pretty evident that the USA alone would absolutely crush Russia. This is why we are forced to help Ukraine defend itself, otherwise Russia will next get its ass kicked by invading a NATO country and then resort to nukes out of desperation. As demonstrated by the Ukrainians, Russia is not the behemoth conventional adversary it was once believed to be. We assume though, because there exists insufficient evidence, that there is no reason to bet that Russia is no longer a nuclear adversary behemoth like no other. As far as "Why is Russia against NATO?", I suspect Russia's fear of losing the empire's hold over the 100+ conquered ethnicities and nationalistic fantasy of returning to the good old days of the USSR's power play a big role. Certainly NATO's hesitation to embrace a nation that remembers the monster Stalin as a hero plays its role too.
The stealth drone does exist, i saw one in Afghanistan and we were told it doesnt exist and to not take pics or talk about it 😅
so shut up then.
thank you for your service
Would you like a microphone to announce that.
So why did the Americans leave Afghanistan so suddenly? Were the Talibans THAT scary? The impression here is that Americans always cut and run when the going gets tough.
@@wahyuindrasto8307 No, they left because they were training a country who didn’t want to fight for their freedom, therefore it was just completely useless.
For all we know, the US could hack any incoming projectile and send it back to its origin. Ouch!
That is a nice Bed Time Story, but wen Nukes fly the Planet will be Ash.
What Plant?? Dude make sense!
russia china can jam anything,make it go haywire or cease to function--usa,nato knows this so i see nothing going to happen--russia has nuke shelter for over half its people also--all of russian missiles,rockets are shielded,cannot jam
Russia have the best electronic warfare
@@seeitasitis 😆
Can B-2s really fly directly from the US ? Wow !
They have a 9,400 mile range without refueling.
They have often flown 30+ hours round trips to central Asia.
@@elessartelcontar9415 That is amazing - I had no idea. Well I guess it goes without saying there must be a toilet in there, and there must be a crew rotation of some sort.
As it was said in the 1960s, there will be nobody left and who want the same leader to lead again if some survive.
Actually there would be plenty of people that survived, I mean 30 thousand years after the asteroid wiped out 80% of life on the planet there were huge pockets of life already coming back, and humans are the most adaptable animal on the planet, there's been 5 mass extinction events and every time life makes it through, in the permian extinction 97% of all life was killed and it came back bigger and stronger than ever, this would be no diffrent.
Stop being a pacifist.
There are many videos on 'how US would react' and not enough videos on 'how US would prevent'.
The response would be the prevention. If we gave Russia the green light to do ignorant $h!t they would continue to do so. The United States does not have an endless supply of defense weapons to continually shoot down Russian strikes. I don't believe urging them to "talk it out" is a good idea either. Showing them consequences would most likely be the best way to get them to stop.
@@JacobErickson-cx4dy The MAD Doctrine has worked well for decades. Hopefully it will continue to do so.
Usa is thinking to destroy Not Russia..not only Russia..usa can't win any war..any war.only way is that nato retreat on border from1989.
Usa is only country that use nuclear weapons. Remember.usa figts against 75 percent of the world
@@JacobErickson-cx4dy no, prevention happens before, response happens after
Exactly, prevent is more important!
I just had a thought, how technolical are the Nukes? Yes they are nukes, but how accurate are they, how powerful, what condition are they in compared to Western weapons? Are they even operational like the rest of their equipment in Ukraine?
The tritium in Russia's nukes has probably decayed by now.
That is insane…
Russia has in time one of the highest tech Missilse.
Dont think a Nuklear War can be won bey one side.
They say the same about their guns, but l wouldn't dare to be at the other end of an Ak47
@@Ademirb123 well AKs at least are by design good quality. They can be dunked in water, mud, sand, and even under a body(according to a tale I heard a long time ago) and still shoot. Everything else Russias has is always over hyped
@@cameronhermann9400 that is why usa used russian rockets for years to go to the space shuttle eh...your brain is over hyped--russia is way advanced in many areas along with china --russia has nuke shelter for over half its people,usa next to none
13:30. That is just gold. Pure gold
“Have no fear for atomic energy, cause non of them can stop the time..” Bob Marley.
Irie!!!!
Don't our satellites keep track of their movable nukes? Can they do it?
Of course
Even with a really limited nuclear exchange (1-2 each side), breaking the nearly 80 year streak of no one using nukes besides for testing (and since the mid 60s only underground tests were allowed) would mean the world could never again be the same. Like how the US was never really the same after 9/11 but this would be on a far greater scale.
Yeah, it would irradiate more steel so that it could not be used for astronomy purposes again in many lifetimes, it would throw off all calculations for carbon 14 in tooth enamel making it harder for criminal investigators to determine the age of corpses, it would possibly require more soil treatment for areas of the most fertile part of Europe and in fourth place it might make some people more likely to use tactical nukes in the future, now that they have actually seen how much damage they cause.
Oh wait, this is like climate change right, one nuke used is one too many?
France did atmospheric tests in Polynesia until 1974.
@@rickfrombohemia9550 And what did the Polynesians have to say about that?
Russia literally nuked someone in London in 2006 if you think about it...
Eure Nation ist die einzige die jemals Atomwaffen gegen ein anderes Land eingesetzt und über Großstädten abgeworfen hat.
Ihr solltet was dieses Thema betrifft mit etwas mehr bedacht herangehen.
Nobody would survive that’s the correct summary of this this video
Feel very safe in Asia. My gold investment will sky rock 🤑
@@leedex😂😂😂
Did you even watch the video?
@@leedexyou think somewhere in Asia is safe? Hope ya got about 10 years of food and water stored up in a deep deep cave!
nuclear war…. It will never ever happen. The scientist that created these weapons leaked the specs to all world powers to make sure one super power has all the power.
Dog barks the loudest doesn’t bite.
Or, as my granny said, "The empty bucket rattles loudest."
Had siberian husky ,pitbull mongrel an he couldn't bark when people came over the fence in the backyard to break in he walked up an grabbed them they never heard it coming all you heard was screams an had to go outback pull him off an call the cops an give him a biscut say good boy
B-52 still going strong. 💪
😂
An ancient fucking TURKEY.
Yep. Ponder this for a second. I'm 60yrs old. The newest B52 is older than I am, and is scheduled to be in service for another ~20yrs. Crazy.
flying targets just like anything that floats,rolls,in a real war they are gone in the first hour and why russia,china have hundreds of thousands of missiles,rockets--usa,nato are stupid
What also Russia can't see is our new B-21 UCAV Stealth Bomber 😁
WW3 will not be fought using Bombers , its 2024 now not 1941
What does that even mean when it won’t have a home to return to it land. This macho and bravado nonsense is useless with nuclear inhalation.
they can see it easily--a farce--anything that flys or floats is a target
You guys are silly. An increased security in Russias airbases= U.S response to nuclear war. Get outta here man
Clarify, what do you mean?
Please add at least some context if you post out such irrationally placed counterclaims?
Ah yeah, and what's "increased security" in Russia? They switch from vodka to coffee? By the time they sobered up, it would all be done. 🤣
"I demolish my bridges behind me, then there is no choice but to move forward." - Fridtjof Nansen
Where do these folks get the idea that Ukraine is losing support. Wake up everyone has doubled down with more help.
Remember when Ukraine was flooded with 200bn weapons for their amazing counteroffensive? Remember what stelar sucess it was? What do you think 60bn will change? It will prolong Ukrainian demise and make it more bloody.
Well, well let me see. Going on three years for a three week "SMO" that didn't happen. Meat waves attacking instead of trained, prepared or equipped soldiers. I like Ukraine's chances of outlasting Moscovia.
@@OleDiaBole remember putin his " 3 days to kyiv " , those days are quite long already?
Russia's best men are gone already, and wich outcome he think he will get from this war?
Embarssed his own country,the red army just proves to be camo wearing folks with guns wich doesnt work properly or are not even trained, the majestical su57 is still a mythe, and they use a lot of outdated material (wich is kinda funny since ukraine had even more older soviet stuff but theirs functioning more than russia's own material)
and offers their own people to either join army and die or go to jail for not joining army and only get out if they do (or they fall out of their windows 🤡)
Best for russia is to retreat and war will end, simple as that
If ukraine stops defending there will be no ukraine left
Either putin retreats or GIVE UKRAINE ALL THE SUPPORT THEY NEED
Because before war, i think everyone would know some russian guy and we all liked them as people we met at travelling, when going out, but their government is fucking that image of russians in general wich this dumb war
@@jw8567 I guess the biggest loss of war (Avdiika) was taken by shovels as well?. kyslivka & Netailove were just taken today: the front lines are collapsing. A Ukrainian brigade fled a Russian advance at Krasnorivka today. If you actually followed the conflict instead of parrot CNN or whatever UA-cam videos you watched from 2022, you will know Russian has advantage of manpower, resources, and time. How can Ukraine outlast Russia when they are literally forcing conscriptions and Russian military is bigger now than it was day of invasion. You are horribly misinformed
Yes , double support , theble losses 😂😂😂
Purely hypothetical. Let's hope that peace can attained beforehand.
And if it isn't?
That requires "removing" the KGB Mafia gov't completely.
US will never agree to a peace agreement, they want to fight the Russians until the last Ukrainian
Omg unlike Russia when the US makes threats they're not bullshit ! I love it 😂
Putin threatened to invade Ukraine and he did 🤔
LOL, its amazing the foolery people post in these chats. US won't initiate a nuclear attack unless its been attack first, all that article 5 Bullshit means nothing when millions of your country men could be wipe out in seconds.
With countries with out power. Why they don’t do anything against russia.. and other things, they like to do shits using other countries in front of them. They just provide weapons only.
omg, has been threatening to "tear Russia's economy to shreds" for 10 years now, since the time of Obama (2014).
They are not bullshit against Afghanistan, Iraq and the likes, but not against Russia. It won't dare make that move, or else it would be history. Russia is no joke. Russia is NATO's worst nightmare.
"Unlike Russia, when the U.S. makes military threats it's not prone to bullshit!" 😆
😅It's funny cuz it's true!
Yeah.. Just like in Afghanistan
Just like in Vietnam😅
@aj9969 If Russia goes like Afghanistan, 90% of Russia will be occupied by NATO, including Moscow, and, after Putin gets killed hiding like coward then dumped into the Artic sea, what's left of the Russia government will hide in China until the US decides it's tired of controlling Russian territory and leaves. Sounds acceptable.
Lol I love it when you trolls bring those up. Vietnam was a war to stop the spread of communism, how many communist countries are there today vs then? Afghanistan, we went there because they were harboring terrorists. Any terrorist that mattered and anyone in Taliban leadership at the time is dead now and I can guarantee you that the current Taliban leadership will do everything in its power to make sure we never have a reason to come back. On the other hand the Soviets were there for only 6 years and collapsed shortly after that. I would also like to point out that the RU army has suffered more casualties in 2 years of war in Ukraine than all US casualties combined since WW2.
@@vicdor1031 Just like ORCS.
Pretty sure no one will survive here. Peace and dialog is whats needed.
Considering that the former nuclear power plant in Chernobyl... (Yes, THAT Chernobyl.) is between Kiyv and the border with Belarus, that would seem to make the likelihood of Russian tactical nuclear weapons use a little more possible...
I truly laugh at the analogy that Putin would actually launch a nuclear device in Ukraine knowing the capability of the European Union and the United States to rain down hell on him
Would NATO cause the end of the human race for Ukraine? I think not. I believe that The West would make large conventional attacks, many in Russia itself. But not so destructive for it to cross Putin's line of threatening the survival of Russia. Since, in this scenario, Putin used tactical nukes in Ukraine, would NATO use tactical nukes in our response? I think not for the same reason as too large of a NATO conventional attack.
@@elessartelcontar9415That man is talking poop....
If Russia strikes Ukraine with nukes ...
US would do nothing...if they try to play stupid games and hit any Russian platform
Its an open nuclear war between Russia against every country that makes up NATO 🙇🏻♀️
@@elessartelcontar9415 , having a war criminal on power could also be your end
go to the statistics of nuclea war heads the rest of Europe and all Nato members including USA, UK etc. their nuvlea asernal is less from Russias nuclea asernal.
'Rain down hell'? The only hell possible would be in Europe.
"What do you think?" I think that Russia would escalate to Strategic weapons incliding ICBM MIRVs. And humanity might survive extinction--or it might not.
You forgot to mention nukes can be launched from submarines. They would launch and go back under leaving no way to retaliate directly against the launcher
Exactly how competent is the Russian nuclear weapons? We know how competent the military and equipment are!!! lmao
Хочешь проверить?)
they've been pushing all of nato back with shovels and turtle tanks
So the west overated their weapons and they were all destroyed. How many hundreds of billions of dollars worth of western weapons have been sent to Ukraine? All destroyed by Russian weapons
Why don’t you find out? Hiding behind a keyboard ?? 😅
Brother in arms, blood is thicker than water . Wisdom wins . Preparedness prevents war but assured peace .
Certainly, the US can carry out a strike like this and cause great harm to Russia, but a strike like this will not be a picnic and the Russian response that will come after it will be very ugly and Europe will certainly pay the biggest price
I honestly don’t think they do.. they don’t have the capability to launch tons of nukes at once, they don’t even have good air defence...
Europeans would literally be gengis khans footstool and been annihilated by the Turks if the Russians didn't fight them for so long, same with the Nazis and Napoleon
@@mark.rwho are you referring to?
@@mark.rDon’t Fucc around and find out 🤞☢️
The US is as close as Europe over the North Pole
We can't beat our m , , t without others help.
7:44 No American wants a nuclear war. But don’t think the possibility of one will stop the US and our citizens from defending ourselves and our allies.
what is he gonna do with ukraine if he turns it into nuclear wasteland,makes no sense
But he’s going to nuke because he’s losing. That’s the story you are supposed to be hearing.
Putin will not nuke Ukraine that’s for sure. Fight for the country and then make it wasteland? Nope
@@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Ha ha. Well put. Ukraine has already won the media war.
Considering how effective the US Navy was at helping fight off the Iranian missiles, which are Russian clones, Ukraine is unlikely to come to the point of being attacked in such a matter.
@@andrewalderman9489It's a warned strike, also most of the projectile are bait
Its the fallout from these weapons which would spread to europe.
Video starts after 5mins
The us isn't immune to nukes. What is this title.
@user-nw8zm2wu6o Nukes are not instant nationstate deleters, and we don't need every single city we have to keep going. Do you think a few nukes could cause a nuclear winter or make a wasteland or something? They can't. We've blown up thousands of those things since we invented them. You're aware that Heroshima and Nagasaki were safe to be in after a week, right? Do you think radiation works how it does in Fallout games?
@user-nw8zm2wu6o It's even questionable how many nukes are even functional. There will be a lot of duds. Nukes need a lot of maintance and with the corruption level in russia, the money they get for it might often not used for that. It's hard to say but fising a nuke is not that easy. It needs a well done mechanism, else it's just a rocket loaded with a lot of radioactive material that wouldn't explode.
The type of nuclear weapon and its design influence the radiation produced. There are two main types: fission bombs, which split heavy atomic nuclei like uranium or plutonium, creating radioactive fallout, and fusion bombs, which combine light atomic nuclei, typically producing less fallout but still some radiation. Fusion bombs are often less radioactive because their fusion reactions produce fewer long-lived radioactive isotopes compared to the fission process. Various factors, including yield, design, and detonation conditions, impact the type and amount of radiation released.
@@melonenlord2723 The President of the United States knows more than you. He isn’t taking that risk. That speaks louder than any conjecture you’re making.
@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Sure we shouldn't take that risk. Even one functional nuke coming through would be catastrophic.
What nucleat threat number are we from bunker grandpa and his serfs are we on by today? Number 20?
38
The human race is at a moment of historic danger: The Doomsday Clock is still 90 seconds to midnight! 90 seconds away from the destruction of human civilization and possibly the human race.
Some history helps with context as to the significance of the Clock;
Founded in 1945 by Albert Einstein, J. Robert Oppenheimer, and University of Chicago scientists who helped develop the first atomic weapons in the Manhattan Project, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists created the Doomsday Clock two years later, using the imagery of apocalypse (midnight) and the contemporary idiom of nuclear explosion (countdown to zero) to convey threats to humanity and the planet. The Doomsday Clock is set every year by the Bulletin’s Science and Security Board in consultation with its Board of Sponsors, which includes nine Nobel laureates. The Clock has become a universally recognized indicator of the world’s vulnerability to global catastrophe caused by man-made technologies.
In the 60s we had technology which could read a license plate from 100 miles away. When clouds covered the target the photos weren't available but now it is no problem. We now can even see through jungle canopy plus much more. I would caution Putin not do do something stupid!
Do you know who put the first man in space?
"I don't know what weapons WWIII will be fought with, but UA-camrs will Surely Claim that they are ***'UNDER-RATED!!!'***" 😳😊
United Kingdom/Great Britain 🇬🇧 (UK/GB) vs North Korea 🇰🇵 (NK/DPRK), who would win in a conflict without nukes involved
Where do they fight? Why, and how? They're about as far away as countries can get, as the ship sails...
Brittain would not have to fight alone.
no chance at all if it were to measure up to the west.NK has nooo
If UK invaded NK they lose
If NK invades UK they lose. It's a lose lose situation
I'm not sure North Korea have much animosity towards the UK, there are embassies in both nations.
Delusional! That is a serious problem. Get help.
"Browning their pants" Anyone else catch that one?
In hindsight, maybe we should have brought back the dinosaurs.
I think we'd all be a lot happier and a lot less bored...
I mean, come on, how boring is a nuclear war, but if the dinosaurs invade well, hello...
We'd stop playing video games, and f*** homework,
It's a dinosaur Invasion man!!!!
AAAHHHH!!!!
We’re done….good bye life on earth
So, was Russia that reckless to rely on Western technology for oil refining?
West wasnt expected to backstab and become unfairly hostile post 1995. It slowly tried to harm like boiling a frog
no choice
all russian tech is western tech. russia dosent make anything except war. (they couldnt even make a car. remember the lada?)
@@ronchasr6656 and you are still losing with best nato missiles, drones, tanks, air defense failing against them ? You are losing lol
Stop dreaming mate!!!@@meteorknight999
Roflol!
No one is going to attack Russia over Ukraine.
USA is a quiet beast not russia a Noise Maker
12:50 - "...intercepted BY the target's main hull" would be more accurate
Video was well done, but title was deceptive and at least bordered on clickbait.
This is insanity .
China -> Russia “Knockoff the saber rattling!” Russia -> China “Knock off the saber rattling!” Biden: “Ohooooooooooo! Look at the pretty colors. Le’s get some ice cream!”
Things would get really proportional, really fast.
Aha! A kindred spirit. All praise @FatElectrician !
This is a stupid caption….If the bear uses nukes there won’t be anything left of the nukeee to respond at all…..
Empire Of Lies 🇺🇲
shitting your pants already Ivan?
Russia has been warned. Don't even think of going there!
Lmao 😂
They know it. They would have already used tactical nukes in Ukraine if they thought they could get away with it.
They will... And NATO Will never react.
@@buravan1512 No they won't. The only country with the nerve to actually use nukes in an armed conflict is the US. Russia just talks blah blah blah.
Will any any of the two nations survive it
Nobody win...all of us gonna die in the first 1 hour
The people that started it all will stay alive in their bunkers for years.
it is not about personal win and survival, rather about personal sacrifice for future and survival of your nation!
beautifully said bro☺🤭😵💫👀
@@tomislavivankovic6971
There'll literally be N O T H l N G left. This war is unwinnable apart from negotiating with Russia for peace, otherwise Its beyond any discussion. Extinction is the only path of a nuclear war
Only rats and flies win in wars.
Everyone has a plan until they get punched in the face 😂😂😂
USA had plans on Abram tanks too😂😂
🤣… how many ruzzian tanks are over 😁
@@Gmordor How many NATO tanks are destroyed 😂
@@GmordorSoviet Tanks helped both Ukraine and Russia to gain territories left and right and on the other hand, Abrams,Leopards and Challengers did absolutely nothing except getting barbecued 😂
The idea is to prevent their use.
The US won't be first-use. Putin on the other hand, I'm not so sure
both sides having them is the prevention. Neither side can stop the return volley. Even if Russia nuked the Pentagon, US AWACS aircraft would assume command and control of US nuclear subs around the world. I'm sure Russia had similar redundancies in place if Moscow was hit. There is no escape or "winning" for either side. That is what has prevented nuclear weapons from being used for over 70 years and it's not changing any time soon. Don't bother listening to the saber rattling from Putin. In the 70's and 80's the nuclear rhetoric was even worse than it is now.
This guy lost me when he mentioned 'Desert Storm.'
It took us 6 months to get the necessary men and equipment in place for that attack.
With zero resistance...
1) US has various existing nato air bases already in Europe with shorter routes into the region.
2) US wouldn’t have to send any land forces since its response would be mainly air strikes, therefore wouldn’t need long prep times. In desert storm, 20% of air launched munitions were smart bombs, today it’s more than 90%.
3) You also were lost when he mentioned the fact that the preparation to use nukes would be detected by satellite surveillance/intelligence.
I don't know if automatic by UA-cam or a setting by the content creator but these double ads in the beginning AND middle AND end of this video is excessive
AdBlock exists for a reason
I got tired of ads. Premium is worth it. Other than that, find a good ad blocker
Adblock plus, also works well on X.
U Tube in the last few days has tripled or many more ads I guess they are trying to become Zillionaires in 60 days???
why would china tell putin to knock off the sabre rattling???
They want Russia to lose and at their weakest. Then swoop in and take back Manchuria.
@2girls1shovelquite so as long as both feel in contention with the USA they need eachother if they marginalise the USA the reason to bond will diminish
MAID - MUTUAL ASSURED INTERNET DISCONNECTION
😄😄 clever👍
Among other things but the Great Disconnect might finally wake them up :)
USA will Fart against a thunderstorm.😅😅😅😅😂😂😂😂
THIS CHANNEL is misleading and twisting facts
Because there has to be a narrative. Learn it.
6 companies own all media in the world. So there's that
Who owns the media in Russia? 🤔
@@bixbysnyder-00Putin of course. But who cares? Russia is such a great country that does not invade other nations and threats with nuclear weapons to ensure no one can aid invaded country directly.
There's a line where Dr Strangelove asks the Soviet: 'But why didn't you announce it to the world? It only works as a deterrent if you announce it to the world!' I guess Joe Biden never saw that movie.
You got MAGA on your mind. Good luck!
@@RalphDavis-qk2xy By MAGA you mean the Russian conspiracy with the republican party to overthrow my democracy? They're always on my mind. The kneejerk defense of Joe is out of fear. Being afraid to criticize your candidate honestly is not something winners do. We need a better candidate to defeat fascism. And not just in the election which does little if Joe wins. Globally.
Fun fact: many people who can't stand Joe Biden also can't stand Donald trump!
Weird I know!
He would be too stupid to understand.
You can criticize Biden on many things, but you can't say he does not understand Putin. Biden has been warning about Putin since 1999. Furthermore, the US stance on Russian use of nukes has been communicated to Russia privately since the war began. The Russians know where the US stands
We really need to keep this conflict conventional. No first strike should be the policy of any sane country.
You consider Russia sane?
@@starmnsixty1209I certainly don't trust the United States after what they did in 1945 they'll likely be the one's to initiate a nuclear exchange.
@@starmnsixty1209 You can be evil and sane.
Russia is far from sane
I believe that no first strike IS the policy of all nations that don't have crazy dictators in charge.
People forgot what nuclear war is.but they will be reminded when there faces melt.
Someone who finally gets the point.
so..once russia detonates the nuclear weapon...where do it think the radiation will fall unto? ukraine is attached to nato and russian allie territories...
Maybe a good reason we shouldn't be provoking a nuclear power on the other side of the world over a border dispute.
@@Joe-Przybranowski so..he willing to risk radiation fallout into Belarus and back into Russia? OR where the Russian separatists are near Moldova??? Sounds like a narcissistic dictator...Megatron over decepticon type of shit mentality...HELL. his own effin troops in ukraine??
@@Joe-Przybranowski it's like...how longshank was in braveheart...when his subordinate warned him that if you shoot the arrows...you would hit our own troops sire... lmmaoo..."we got reserve...it will hit theirs as well...ATTACK..." LLMMAOO
Modern nukes have very little fall out compared to the first one's
@Joe-Pryzbranowski This is more than a border dispute. This is a full scale invasion by Russia.
Wouldn't tactical Nukes block Russia's ability to be able to pass through because of radiation. Therefore narrowing lanes they can attack through, making it easier to defend those lines. (Assuming quantities of losses of where they are targeting isn't significant)
Very little long lasting radioactive fallout if the nuclear weapon detonated properly.
The fallout from atomic bombs falls down to a safe level in just a couple of days bion.
@@AdrianFahrenheitTepes Many thanks
Just ask the Russian soldiers who dug all those foxholes in Pripyat how the Russian military feels about fallout...
The real question would be the reaction of China.
For that reason alone I don't think Russia would even consider using nuclear weapons.
A limited response from your enemy is one. Alienating your frenemy is another can of worms.
We should not call them Russia but Putin's forces, so as to distinguish between the peace wanting Russian citizens and the people behing Putin. By doing this we contribute to a separation between the two and a possible revolt in Russia.
Russia has around 6500 nukes, only less than 2000 active, a third of those high yield, 2 thirds low yield. High yield nukes delivered by rockets and missiles probably around 1000 if not less. NATO has similar numbers but 2 thirds are high yield. There are over 20.000 cities in the West, around a billion people. There are some 1100 cities in Russia, some 145 million people. In a full nuclear exchange, Russia must choose its targets carefully, it can not hit them all, not enough nukes. But the West has enough nukes to hit all cities in Russia several times and still have spares. In the absolutely worst case scenario, 300 million westerners would die but Russia would be GONE FOREVER!
You say things on UA-cam but not things that are real on ground.
@@africanintelligentrevoluti1446 What exactly is your point? Enlighten us!
@@3ast3rn3r What I say is,
Actually, western are still having in their minds, the old world but things have changed.
So now there's no America that will still say I am the best in this or no one is that.
US is never again the first power at all for were they tempt to have some advantages, they are beaten somewhere else and annihilating the power.
1-Fort air furtivity, US are not the first or the only one.
2-For missiles, US are not the first or the only one.
3-For the nukes, US are not the first.
4-For Economy, US aren't longer the first.
So they can never carry again any war like before against the 3 firsts like China, Russia or India.
Times have changed
enjoying your life in a fantasy world? so 300 millions lives would be a chicken change?
@@AfiaA.-vb3xz Nobody mentioned any chickens! The point was, if a full blown nuclear war were to happen tomorrow, the West would lose a third of the population, while Russia would be forever gone, erased from history! And under these circumstances, Russia is still the one threatening with nuclear war! If I were Biden, I would remind them publicly what the situation is and advise them to go easy with the threats!
And you think That the US wouldn't be struck back?
No.
@@piotrmontgomerytv7786 5000k ? good luck with that
@@piotrmontgomerytv7786 God? Do you have any proof because the government doesn’t have any on him. If anything God would let millions or billions of people die off.
Russia's barely even able to retaliate when Ukraine throws a few drones at them. Unless they're willing to delete their whole country by starting a full-on nuclear attack, there's nothing they could do to retaliate. Putin might be crazy but he's not dumb
@@Wyomingchief Even if he wanted to attack the U.S./NATO, Putin does not have the unilateral authority to launch weapons from his nation's nuclear arsenal. There are others in the chain of command who don't want their loved ones turned into radioactive ash.
Ukraine is toast without the need for nukes. The rest of the supposition is bunk
Pour l'instant, les seuls à avoir utilisé l'arme nucléaire dans une guerre et contre une cible civile sont les États-Unis.
Je ne dis pas qu'ils ont eu tort, car cela a mis fin à la guerre avec des pertes probablement moins importantes que si la guerre avait continué.
A child wrote this title. A child that doesn't understand Russia has missiles with nuclear warheads pointed at the USA
and the US has nuclear missiles pointed at Russia, what's your point?
@@Jadefox32the point is US would do nothing and tremble when Russia hits Ukraine with nukes
@@JusticeGranville-uk8wwthats wrong, and i can prove that in seconds. If ukraine gets hit with nukes, then nuclear fallout and radioactive particles will enter into NATO territory. If you look into the NATO articles, the NATO Members are FORCED to intervene if something like that would happen. So no, youre wrong.
@@Jadefox32 get owned
@@JusticeGranville-uk8ww “the point is US would do nothing and tremble when Russia hits Ukraine with nukes”
You are mistaking a Promise as a Bluff.
I was in US Naval Aviation (P3C) for 10 years during the cold war with the USSR. Tactical Nukes were part of the US Military doctrine.
Our Flight Crews were required to be Nuke Load certified once a year and every so often I would see a bird roped off with a Dummy Nuke sitting on an ordinance rack being loaded by a flight crew. Not once did my thought process go,
“We will never use them.”,
instead in went,
“Someday that could be the real thing.”.
you do understand they have as many assets ready to launch as we do right.... this isn't oh we need to load up first kind of scenario.
Very little thought going on here
Nobody wants to be turned into radioactive ash. Those in control of nuclear missile bases don't want that to happen to their loved ones -- their kids and grandkids.
comes down to capabilities and I'll keep with Western tech because Nato wargear actually works. Eastern wargear depends entirely on how poor an individual is and whether selling the part is worth it.
What are we talking about here us all being dead? 😂
The inevitable will eventually come...the battle between The Bear , The Dragon and The Eagle.
Not a damned bit of GOOD will become of it either.
We are doomed.
russian bots in 3..2..1..
I see the American bots already got started
Russia strong! 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
braaap
Take meds
Controlled 🇷🇺
Russian "bear"😂....koala bear yeah.
plush bear
usa won't do shit.
ah
such pleasant copium
@@electricspeedkiller8950that’s some good copium, where can I get some
Let's all cling to our ignorant perspectives and laugh haha
"Both missiles feature AI, allowing them to pick out targets in an electronically denied environment. Allowing them to differentiate civilian and military targets to a high degree of accuracy"... Well that makes a change for American weapons, maybe should have sent them to Israel instead of the babykiller3000's they currently employ. 🤣
It's clear from the discussion here that we do not know how Russian military will respond to threats. Russian commanders have saved us from WW# more than once in the past but we cannot assume that this will continue.
Russia couldn’t even stop a bunch of farmers.😛
BUNCH OF FARMERS WITH US AND ENTIRE EUROPE WEAPONS DOESNT HAVE A COUNTRY HALF OF IT IS WITH RUSSIA 😂
Still a bunch of farmers. You think Putin would attack a country with an army that could defend it self? No…
keep living in delusions
@@michaelvoisine7075 WELL ENTIRE EUROPE AND NATO HAS SENT BEST ARMS RUSSIANS ARE FIGHTING FOR PAST ONE YEAR UKRAINE COMEDIAN PRESIDENT HAS LOST HALF OF HIS COUNTRY
The same farmers that the US encountered in Iraq and Afghanistan? Oh do not forget Vietnam.
Russia has skyscrapers too. Moscow. You can show it🙄. 2:20-
There's no scenario where it would make military sense for Russia to use nuclear weapons, and Ukraine delivering some retaliation into Russia using Himars or ATACAMS isn't going to trigger nuclear suicide on Russia's part. They'll take their lumps, keep trying to psych the west into not giving Ukraine more of the same weapons, and if that's unsuccessful eventually decide they're not winning more than they're losing, and make the calculation that withdrawing is the best move. JUST LIKE THEY DID IN AFGHANISTAN, ten years and hundreds of thousands of soldiers later.
Using conscripts as cannon fodder doesn't quite work as well in an air war. Maybe putin can find some WWI biplanes in his junkyard.
They are doing pretty well so far being only armed with shovels and convicts right?
No such thing as cannon fodder in this war clown. Every soldier counts for both zelensky and Putin
To jsou správně zvolené zbraně proti USA 😂😢😮😅😊
The aliens will stop a nuclear war
There's actually a possibility that they might
Bleep.
Not likely, because there's evidence in antiquity of devastating nuclear exchange, yet no one stopped it -> see Mahabharata