I’m assuming this system is one that only has one pull station because it appears to be brand new. Still have mixed feelings on the whole one pull station for a building thing.
I say to heck with that part of the code: if you ask me manual stations are still very important to have in fire detection & alarm systems, given automatic detection can't always be relied upon.
@@TheCarson116 I mean in new construction they are unnecessary and dangerous. In a school that’s fully sprinklered, has automatic smoke detection where applicable, and has at least one pull station at a main entrance near the office, and where there’s two way communication with the office in each room, what’s the point? Any danger would be automatically suppressed and in the highly unlikely event the automatic detection doesn’t sound the alarm instantly, just call the office and they will do it. I get the short delay, but in modern construction, the delay is perfectly safe.
@@TheCarson116 as long as the building meets all of the previous codes, then even if there was a fire and no alarm system at all, no one would get hurt. Modern schools don’t burn down. Modern schools have shooters that use fire alarms to kill students. It’s pretty simple.
It’s most likely programmed to play the evac message 3 times and then loop the code 3 signal afterwards. A lot of Simplex systems are like that as well.
@@FourtyFiftyEighty The same way most Simplex voice evac systems seem to be set up, instead of alternating between a tone & a message (the latter if you ask me should be the standard way it's done, since the occupants will be repeatedly reminded of the reason they're evacuating for).
@@FourtyFiftyEighty Well alright. I guess it makes sense since temporal 3 is defined as an "evacuation signal", not specifically a "fire alarm signal" (even though the latter is usually what it's used for), & you'd most certainly want to evacuate a building if carbon monoxide was present in it.
Dang! That's a nice system. I've never seen those accordion fire partitions in buildings before.
2:09 - Is that a FIRE CURTAIN!? I’ve never seen one of those before, but that’s freaking COOL!
Great video that’s a nice looking system and a nice building
I love your vids!
Hi Nic!
Wow very epic, i cant wait to see the full series man ! Keep it up man!!!
What is resetting the emergency communication system for?
What a nice building
Dang the fire alarm went OOOOOO BOI TIME TO KILL YOU and thats why its cage
I wanna hear that 9838
ua-cam.com/video/4vKgUPGnu64/v-deo.html
What test pole is that?
I’m assuming this system is one that only has one pull station because it appears to be brand new. Still have mixed feelings on the whole one pull station for a building thing.
I say to heck with that part of the code: if you ask me manual stations are still very important to have in fire detection & alarm systems, given automatic detection can't always be relied upon.
@@TheCarson116 I mean in new construction they are unnecessary and dangerous. In a school that’s fully sprinklered, has automatic smoke detection where applicable, and has at least one pull station at a main entrance near the office, and where there’s two way communication with the office in each room, what’s the point? Any danger would be automatically suppressed and in the highly unlikely event the automatic detection doesn’t sound the alarm instantly, just call the office and they will do it. I get the short delay, but in modern construction, the delay is perfectly safe.
@@dale4231 "Dangerous" my foot, I'd say it's *more* dangerous to not have a manual means to sound the alarm with than to not have such.
@@TheCarson116 as long as the building meets all of the previous codes, then even if there was a fire and no alarm system at all, no one would get hurt. Modern schools don’t burn down. Modern schools have shooters that use fire alarms to kill students. It’s pretty simple.
Wait till he finds out there’s only 11 smokes
when's part 2
Is there a reason why the voice message stops after a certain point? Is that by default in the programming, or did they set that up on purpose?
It’s most likely programmed to play the evac message 3 times and then loop the code 3 signal afterwards. A lot of Simplex systems are like that as well.
Did it get stuck on code 3 halfway through the bell test
It’s programmed to do 3 rounds of voice then loop code 3
@@FourtyFiftyEighty The same way most Simplex voice evac systems seem to be set up, instead of alternating between a tone & a message (the latter if you ask me should be the standard way it's done, since the occupants will be repeatedly reminded of the reason they're evacuating for).
Overall opinion??
Pretty cool system ngl
did you hear pa speaker?
1:04 The alarm's not supposed to do temporal 3 for a CO condition, is it?
Message says “there’s a report of an emergency” not a fire alarm so it’s fine
@@FourtyFiftyEighty Well alright. I guess it makes sense since temporal 3 is defined as an "evacuation signal", not specifically a "fire alarm signal" (even though the latter is usually what it's used for), & you'd most certainly want to evacuate a building if carbon monoxide was present in it.
It is in walk test most likely
@@hulktheman23 Yes it was, didn't you see the scene card?
Welcome back from jail
Why would he go to jail
@@nics-systems-electric for tampering with fire alarms
If you didn’t read the title, he is testing them, not tampering.
Is that a SigCom panel?
Silent knight
@@FourtyFiftyEighty what model?
@@hilo2-est3-elev I was going to say the IFP 2000ECS however it doesn’t appear to be that from what I can see in the video.
Honeywell ifp-2100