Tank you for all your job. So much interesting and so much encouraging when you believe in organic biologic and human agriculture 😊. Olivier dairy farmer from France
I'm still not seeing any demonstrations of interplanting Cash Crops with 4 - 8 intetcropped cover plants. Does Dr. Jones have any resources (videos/books) showing examples of Cash Crops using diversified Cover Cropping?
Look up Jason Mauk (I believe he's farming in IN), he intercrops wheat and soy, and maize/corn with forage crops. His approach can also be modified to work with all sorts of different crops/combinations (winter wheat & winter pea, Rye and dry bean (like pinto), Kamut or Durum wheat and spring peas, winter barley and Winter Lentil, Corn and Soy, corn and dry beans, Millet and soy, ect. If growing crops that are harvested together (like corn and soy), you would simply need a spiral separator and possibly a rotary cleaner to separate the round seed (soy, beans) from the non-round seeds (wheat, corn, ect).
So if only 10%-40% of the nitrogen applied if taken up by the plant, the average of that is 25%. So when i foliar apply the nitrogen to the plants and get close to 100% absorption, that is why the foliar applied nitrogen is about 4 times more efficient than other applied nitrogen. Interesting
@@veganchiefwarrior6444 Just because food is organic doesnt mean its being farmed regeneratively or even sustainably. This is a whole new level of thinking about how we view the soil.
Your presentations are really enlightening. I am following them and others about soil and carbon for a long time. Living in Spain, I would like to pass them on to my spanish Friends. Are there any translations/subtitles available? Thanks again for your superb work. Rolf
You realize she was using data that is over 5 years old right? So the problem mentioned in the video existed before "the last 3 years" Meanwhile I haven't seen any actual research showing any reproductive effects of any recent vaccines. Just a lot of claims and at best correlations.
Can you please clarify/add context to her statements such as: *Brain cancer is the leading cause of death for children under 15. I feel that this statistic is misleading. Death from natural (and accidental) causes is so rare in children of that age group that when they do die, it's due to some sort of exotic cancer. Compare this to accidental deaths among people over 70. Their rates of death from accidental causes are probably higher than for children under 15 but their rates of death from natural causes are several magnitudes higher. Their rates of death from exotic brain cancers is also probably much higher than children under 15 but their rates of death from heart attack, stroke, cancer, kidney failure, etc. are much MUCH higher. This statistic is rarely cited because it doesn't arouse fear in people. People over 70 dying, regardless of the cause, is expected. No one is shocked by this. But children under 15 dying causes concern in everybody. *Alzheimer's is almost unheard of in developing countries. In the US, Alzheimer's strikes mainly the elderly. In developing countries, so many more people die of infectious diseases, that are routinely treated in the US. Life expectancy in "developing" countries is much lower than it is in the US. Naturally, if a country's life expectancy is much lower than that of a "developed" country, their rates of Alzheimer's disease is going to be much MUCH, lower than a country with a much longer life expectancy. Why doesn't she compare apples to apples? Japan compared to Korea, for example. The US and the UK would be another good comparison. Citing statistics like the ones she did, without giving context, is irresponsible and misleading! It does NOT add to her credibility!
Excellent comment. She seems a great soil scientist, but the appeal to emotion is problematic and not becoming of a seasoned scientist as this. I was particularly disappointed with the misinformation presented about autism. Similar reasons to those you describe about disease in general - ie an unreasonable presentation of statistics, with dubious veracity.
What I found, and it may be what she ment to say, I really can't say, but brain cancer in children is the type of cancer that kills the most, definitely not what kills children the most, but as far as cancer deaths in children, it leads. But I agree, it would be nice to have sited facts to help those of us interested
This misses the broader point on a few levels. We shouldn't have so many acres under production to begin with. We use 10x the land we need to produce enough calories to feed the population. stop eating so much meat and dairy and we could reduce acres underproduction, increase biodiversity, reduce fossil fuel inputs including fertilizers.
she also guesses that the leading diseases of humans are caused by nutrient deficiencies, they are all actually diseases of excess, not deficiency, animal products are carcinogenic to the human body, plus lets not forget to have more respect for the animals feelings and treat them with the same respect we would want to be treated with
@@veganchiefwarrior6444 Well yes, animal products produced by conventional agriculture are toxic in every sense of the word, to the environment, to the farmers bottom line and to the consumer. If you listen to what Dr Jones is actually saying you might realise she is trying to open peoples eyes to a better alternative. I certainly havent seen any solutions coming from Vegans who are part of the problem.
Yes you are right if you are talking about conventional Ag. But this is about Regenerative Ag. Completely different. Animals are used to grow soil and increase biodiversity by mimicing natural systems.
@@Forester-qs5mf Do you actually have any facts to support your opinion? Animals are used to grow soil, increase biodiversity by mimicking natural systems.. LOL what a bunch of nonscientific garbage. We clear forest to grow cereals and legumes to feed animals, that doesn't grow soil, increase biodiversity or mimick a natural systems. It's a 20th century monstrosity. We are eating more meat now than at any point in history and we have more people than any any point, and hence we are clearing forests at a record pace. It's not sustainable. I don't care if you put a nice word like "regenerative" infront of Ag. It's lipstick on a PIG. The only solution is to regrow forests where forests naturally exist. For natural grasslands, OK, we can have a separate conversation about pasture raised livestock.
@@veganchiefwarrior6444 Bingo.. lack of nutrients is a completely made up fairy tale to cover for the fact that we consume an unhealthy diet HIGH in meat, dairy, processed fats, sugars, LOW in whole plant foods. That's the real reason we get cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and everything else that people still living on whole food plant based diets in less developed areas never seem to suffer from, despite their "lack of protein"
Tank you for all your job. So much interesting and so much encouraging when you believe in organic biologic and human agriculture 😊. Olivier dairy farmer from France
Thank you so much for the informative video. Thanks, Dr.Chiristine Jones for the enlightening talk.
Another great talk by the Dr.
The best video about soil health I've ever seen. Thank you so much
No reply to comments. Brilliant woman, brilliant lectures.
Wow, this was an amazing presentation! Thanks for sharing, I am very much looking forward to the next on Biostimulants and the fermentation process!
Dear Green Cover Seed, thank you so much for this video. Its an eye opener. Please upload the second presentation as soon as possible. Best Regards.
Bulgarian here . Thank you!
Amazing content!
Nicely broken down so a layperson can understand it, yet packed full of great information.
I'm still not seeing any demonstrations of interplanting Cash Crops with 4 - 8 intetcropped cover plants.
Does Dr. Jones have any resources (videos/books) showing examples of Cash Crops using diversified Cover Cropping?
Gabe Brown grows a mixed cash crop.
Look up Jason Mauk (I believe he's farming in IN), he intercrops wheat and soy, and maize/corn with forage crops.
His approach can also be modified to work with all sorts of different crops/combinations (winter wheat & winter pea, Rye and dry bean (like pinto), Kamut or Durum wheat and spring peas, winter barley and Winter Lentil, Corn and Soy, corn and dry beans, Millet and soy, ect.
If growing crops that are harvested together (like corn and soy), you would simply need a spiral separator and possibly a rotary cleaner to separate the round seed (soy, beans) from the non-round seeds (wheat, corn, ect).
So if only 10%-40% of the nitrogen applied if taken up by the plant, the average of that is 25%. So when i foliar apply the nitrogen to the plants and get close to 100% absorption, that is why the foliar applied nitrogen is about 4 times more efficient than other applied nitrogen. Interesting
I changed at 43 ! Best decision ever made for everyone including the soil and my plants. Oh ya and less garbage and less work
congradulations on surviving 43 years on non organic food! :D
@@veganchiefwarrior6444 Just because food is organic doesnt mean its being farmed regeneratively or even sustainably. This is a whole new level of thinking about how we view the soil.
Thank you very much.
I’m feeling that feeling right now just a sugar addict
You’re so cool Christine. Learned alot
Please post the second part.
So true and so world wide.
What book is she referring to the pictures and articles in? at 1 hour in.
Thankyou very much. Is second part posted?
Your presentations are really enlightening.
I am following them and others about soil and carbon for a long time.
Living in Spain, I would like to pass them on to my spanish Friends.
Are there any translations/subtitles available?
Thanks again for your superb work.
Rolf
If there's something specific you want translated, I could do that for you.
hgrdhrdh
No noticeable drop in human fertility if they didn't take any of the shots in the last 3 years. Great presentation
You realize she was using data that is over 5 years old right?
So the problem mentioned in the video existed before "the last 3 years"
Meanwhile I haven't seen any actual research showing any reproductive effects of any recent vaccines.
Just a lot of claims and at best correlations.
please give the link to the talk on biostimulants and fermentation process
there are many many spelling errors in subtitles, where can i get an article about the video
This didn't appear to have much to do with "Biological Stimulant Compost Workshop". Is there another part somewhere?
This was from out Compost Workshop back in June. We are currently working on the second presentation and will post it soon!
there are many many spelling errors in subtitles
Is the second presentation available?
This was from out Compost Workshop back in June. We are currently working on the second presentation and will post it soon!
@@GreenCoverSeed very much looking forward to it! Thanks so much for sharing this one!!
there are spelling many many errors in subtitles
If it is going in ocean we know micro algae and algae should absorb all of is as most of biomass is in oceans
She and Keith keep mentioning "a book", please enlighten us with the title.
Distribution snd retail se to take to much snd don t pay for farmers a fair value of the product
Primacy drives need in environment. Ash wood coals provide. .
Slash n burn figures
Can you please clarify/add context to her statements such as:
*Brain cancer is the leading cause of death for children under 15. I feel that this statistic is misleading. Death from natural (and accidental) causes is so rare in children of that age group that when they do die, it's due to some sort of exotic cancer. Compare this to accidental deaths among people over 70. Their rates of death from accidental causes are probably higher than for children under 15 but their rates of death from natural causes are several magnitudes higher. Their rates of death from exotic brain cancers is also probably much higher than children under 15 but their rates of death from heart attack, stroke, cancer, kidney failure, etc. are much MUCH higher. This statistic is rarely cited because it doesn't arouse fear in people. People over 70 dying, regardless of the cause, is expected. No one is shocked by this. But children under 15 dying causes concern in everybody.
*Alzheimer's is almost unheard of in developing countries. In the US, Alzheimer's strikes mainly the elderly. In developing countries, so many more people die of infectious diseases, that are routinely treated in the US. Life expectancy in "developing" countries is much lower than it is in the US. Naturally, if a country's life expectancy is much lower than that of a "developed" country, their rates of Alzheimer's disease is going to be much MUCH, lower than a country with a much longer life expectancy. Why doesn't she compare apples to apples? Japan compared to Korea, for example. The US and the UK would be another good comparison.
Citing statistics like the ones she did, without giving context, is irresponsible and misleading! It does NOT add to her credibility!
Excellent comment. She seems a great soil scientist, but the appeal to emotion is problematic and not becoming of a seasoned scientist as this.
I was particularly disappointed with the misinformation presented about autism. Similar reasons to those you describe about disease in general - ie an unreasonable presentation of statistics, with dubious veracity.
What I found, and it may be what she ment to say, I really can't say, but brain cancer in children is the type of cancer that kills the most, definitely not what kills children the most, but as far as cancer deaths in children, it leads. But I agree, it would be nice to have sited facts to help those of us interested
Good question. Kinda left hanging. Let me guess.
This was from out Compost Workshop back in June. We are currently working on the second presentation and will post it soon!
@@GreenCoverSeed any luck yet on the second presentation, kindly share the link
@@GreenCoverSeed Yes please post the second part :)
) has
This misses the broader point on a few levels. We shouldn't have so many acres under production to begin with. We use 10x the land we need to produce enough calories to feed the population. stop eating so much meat and dairy and we could reduce acres underproduction, increase biodiversity, reduce fossil fuel inputs including fertilizers.
she also guesses that the leading diseases of humans are caused by nutrient deficiencies, they are all actually diseases of excess, not deficiency, animal products are carcinogenic to the human body, plus lets not forget to have more respect for the animals feelings and treat them with the same respect we would want to be treated with
@@veganchiefwarrior6444 Well yes, animal products produced by conventional agriculture are toxic in every sense of the word, to the environment, to the farmers bottom line and to the consumer. If you listen to what Dr Jones is actually saying you might realise she is trying to open peoples eyes to a better alternative. I certainly havent seen any solutions coming from Vegans who are part of the problem.
Yes you are right if you are talking about conventional Ag. But this is about Regenerative Ag. Completely different. Animals are used to grow soil and increase biodiversity by mimicing natural systems.
@@Forester-qs5mf Do you actually have any facts to support your opinion? Animals are used to grow soil, increase biodiversity by mimicking natural systems.. LOL what a bunch of nonscientific garbage. We clear forest to grow cereals and legumes to feed animals, that doesn't grow soil, increase biodiversity or mimick a natural systems. It's a 20th century monstrosity. We are eating more meat now than at any point in history and we have more people than any any point, and hence we are clearing forests at a record pace. It's not sustainable. I don't care if you put a nice word like "regenerative" infront of Ag. It's lipstick on a PIG. The only solution is to regrow forests where forests naturally exist. For natural grasslands, OK, we can have a separate conversation about pasture raised livestock.
@@veganchiefwarrior6444 Bingo.. lack of nutrients is a completely made up fairy tale to cover for the fact that we consume an unhealthy diet HIGH in meat, dairy, processed fats, sugars, LOW in whole plant foods. That's the real reason we get cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and everything else that people still living on whole food plant based diets in less developed areas never seem to suffer from, despite their "lack of protein"