Why the hell does this have so many dislikes? It's a beautiful document of a glorious time. No helmets! Polite players, and true sportsmanship. No hideous Barmy Army (I am English and can't stand them). Both teams had sone amazing players, and if the bowling looks sedate, it really wasn't. Griffith and Hall were easily 90mph bowlers.
It would be marvellous to see ball by ball coverage of these test matches. People would get a shock with the over rate though! In those days bowlers just bowled, got back to their mark and bowled the next delivery. There was no 'dawdling' between overs, no 3 hour conferences to set field placings and the batsmen wouldn't stop the bowler in his run up because he saw a twig fall some 200 yards away!!
Great names of cricket came in the way, like Lance Gibbs, Ken Barrington, Frank Worrell, and more. The commentary was very articulate. The commentators over radio were different. There were sport journaslists from all over the world present at the occassion. True, political developments were getting top stories. Fiedel Castro of Cuba, John F. Kennedy from USA, and Russian politician, Mr Chruchef were in the lime light. Ted Decestor, Tom Greveney, G Sobers, Kehnai, Hall were also in action at least on the field.
A lovely thing to watch. No helmets, neater hairstyles, no visible tattoos, proper white kit with short sleeved sweaters. Dignified celebrations. And did you see how well dressed and respectful the crowd were? There's a degrading awfulness about life today.
Maybe when I'm old and decrepit I'll understand why people hate change so much but until then I'll let other people be who they want to be and if that includes tattoos and hairstyles that aren't neat then so be it. Don't understand why the older generation thought it so important to control what other people did in regards to things that had no effect on them
@@rorybessell8280 I smiled at the thought of you being old and grey in years to come, lamenting the fact that so few people go round looking like crap with hardly a piercing or tattoo in sight as they did in your day. Now they are nicely dressed and have neat hair cuts. What has become of the world you grew up in? Plus ca change, I suppose, in a way.
@@quietenglishman4179 I mean, I personally don't have a single piercing or tattoo and don't particularly like them, but we've moved past the point of politeness and dress being a moral issue because it doesn't infringe upon anyone else
Excellent. I remember the series, we were glued to the screen (or the radio. Dexter was a fine sight, though he tended to get out before making a ton, as here. The pace and aggression of Hall and Griffith marked the summer, and Cowdrey’s broken arm was a reminder that cricket is dangerous. The great hero for England was Close, absolutely fearless and indomitable.
I can't even comprehend why there are people out there who dislike teammates showing appreciation for one another and a bit of enjoyment when succeeding. What a sad existence you must lead, if that's a problem to you
@@rorybessell8280 no problem with teammates sharing success and no sad existence. It’s sad that you perceive that because of a comment on method rather than principle. Just how it’s done now with the American high fives everywhere and queuing up to do that.
The amazing thing about The Mid 1960's in London at, say, The Oval was that England v West Indies was an AWAY game and yet over the last 50 years mass immigration has occurred and yet these days, whereas the crowd was, literally, 80%+ West Indian/Black British when those Guys were just under 2% of Londoners and now when their numbers have increased eight-fold they are only a small percentage of the crowd !
@@Isleofskye There are many reasons, but remember: The people in this clip were actually from the West Indies (and brought up in a cricket-mad culture). Young Black Britons now are their great-grandchildren with far looser ties to the Caribbean and to its culture(s).
I'm more confused that a bowler of that pace could ever play test cricket. Plenty of club cricketers can land it on a spot over and over but will never make even a first-class side
@@rorybessell8280 Uncovered pitches meant there was far more scope for medium pacers. Plus, putting it on the spot is not quite the same as always putting it where it's not quite there to drive against the very best.
At 6:25 - Lance Gibbs bowling off-spin. VERY RARE. There are no other videos of him bowling on You Tube. Interesting because at one point, he was the highest West Indian test wicket taker. Great, historical video. Then at 7:55, the great Frank Worrell bowling. First time I have ever seen that.
There are other videos of Gibbs bowling. I would point you to the "Australia vs West Indies, Test Series 1960/61 Highlights" video which features Gibbs taking a hat trick. Plenty of Alf Valentine as well, such a lovely action.
No high fives for the bowler when a wicket fell in those days. No hugs and hardly any back slapping either and the most he might have expected was a cursory "well done".
At 1:40 Dexter, Close, Cowdrey, Stewart (back) and Shackleton the bowler. 3:05 Edrich & Stewart open batting against two short-legs. Do you see that nowadays?
@@robbdavies7749 Because he now possess the false bravado akin to whoever wields the financial muscle of the day should paint the narrative of the past present and future.
As a schoolboy I used to cut pictures of these cricket heroes and paste them in old railway timetable books and feel great pleasure in showing to my friends my treasure. Great names like Wes Hall; Charlie Griffith; Ted Dexter; Ken Barrington, Colin Cowdrey. I always longed to see them in action. After so many years it is heavenly to see them in these rare footages . Only a few of them are, I suppose, alive. What a splendid trip back to childhood days!! I would also like to see Vinoo Mankad and Pauly Umrigar in action. --- Sharad Rajimwale
1963 a memorable year in which some historic events took place: The Great Train Robbery, Kim Philby affair, Kristine Keller, assassination of President Kennedy, all thrilled the world.
The Beatles released their first no. 1 LP "Please Please Me", Bobby Moore captained England for the first time, the first episode of "Dr Who" was broadcast and I turned 12.
Doubt it, Hall, Griffith and Trueman would have been quick, but definitely not as rapid as fast bowlers in other periods. Apart from Trueman and Tyson (who didn't play enough), it was a pretty poor period for true, fast bowling
Gentlemen cricket until1975 world cup limited over. Then Vulgarism was brought in by Australia and Ian Chappell brothers and counter attack by Clive Lloyd.
No that is not true. West Indies had recently played the famous tied test in Brisbane, and only narrowly lost that series down under. They won this series here in England 3-1.
No, West Indies were a force to ve reckoned with - Kanhai, Butcher, Nurse, Hunte, Griffiths, Hall, Gibbs, Worrell, and of course Gary Sobers. And that's just off the top of my head.
The bowling's absolutely sublime - really fluid actions (except for Griffith who was proper scary!?) But the batting - Stewart, Close and Barrington all got out to shots where they didn't move their feet.
When you don't helmets,all kinds of guards, thin pads and thinner gloves, this is how your technique looks. Try holding a bat without these against the hard cricket ball on an uncovered wicket facing atleast 130 kmph bowlers and share us your experiences.
Why the hell does this have so many dislikes? It's a beautiful document of a glorious time. No helmets! Polite players, and true sportsmanship. No hideous Barmy Army (I am English and can't stand them). Both teams had sone amazing players, and if the bowling looks sedate, it really wasn't. Griffith and Hall were easily 90mph bowlers.
People probably wanted to see the whole Test to the end.
It would be marvellous to see ball by ball coverage of these test matches. People would get a shock with the over rate though! In those days bowlers just bowled, got back to their mark and bowled the next delivery. There was no 'dawdling' between overs, no 3 hour conferences to set field placings and the batsmen wouldn't stop the bowler in his run up because he saw a twig fall some 200 yards away!!
Wonderful to see Derek Shackleton in action . A great servant to Hampshire cricket for 20 years 1948 to 68
His son played for Gloucestershire but wasn’t quite as successful
Derek Shackleton is the medium-pacer (test debut 1950!). I was at this match and saw Hall and Griffith bowling.
golden days of real cricket ❣️
Deryck Murray, the Windies wicketkeeper was still playing test cricket in the 1980s.
He was only 20 here - it was his second test match.
He actually played his last test in 1980, unfortunately he was not the same keeper
@@rsr4035 So. The 1980s then.
@@rsr4035 He Played 1963---1980
great memories for a then 14 year old cricket mad schoolboy.
Thanks for the upload. A lot of these great names are before my time. It's good see them playing
Great names of cricket came in the way, like Lance Gibbs, Ken Barrington, Frank Worrell, and more. The commentary was very articulate. The commentators over radio were different. There were sport journaslists from all over the world present at the occassion. True, political developments were getting top stories. Fiedel Castro of Cuba, John F. Kennedy from USA, and Russian politician, Mr Chruchef were in the lime light. Ted Decestor, Tom Greveney, G Sobers, Kehnai, Hall were also in action at least on the field.
And not forgetting Jim Parks WK, Ted Dexter’s county team mate.
A magnificent innings from Dexter...
I didn't realise they had action replays this early - interesting.
Isn't it great though to have the slow-motion close-up replays from different angles on a huge hi-def TV?
The field placement of the olden days for pace bowlers is totally alien in nowadays cricket.
A lovely thing to watch. No helmets, neater hairstyles, no visible tattoos, proper white kit with short sleeved sweaters. Dignified celebrations. And did you see how well dressed and respectful the crowd were? There's a degrading awfulness about life today.
"Degrading awfulness" is a bit over the top, isn't it?
@@exessex3522 Have you walked round virtually any town centre recently?
Maybe when I'm old and decrepit I'll understand why people hate change so much but until then I'll let other people be who they want to be and if that includes tattoos and hairstyles that aren't neat then so be it. Don't understand why the older generation thought it so important to control what other people did in regards to things that had no effect on them
@@rorybessell8280 I smiled at the thought of you being old and grey in years to come, lamenting the fact that so few people go round looking like crap with hardly a piercing or tattoo in sight as they did in your day. Now they are nicely dressed and have neat hair cuts. What has become of the world you grew up in? Plus ca change, I suppose, in a way.
@@quietenglishman4179 I mean, I personally don't have a single piercing or tattoo and don't particularly like them, but we've moved past the point of politeness and dress being a moral issue because it doesn't infringe upon anyone else
Excellent. I remember the series, we were glued to the screen (or the radio. Dexter was a fine sight, though he tended to get out before making a ton, as here. The pace and aggression of Hall and Griffith marked the summer, and Cowdrey’s broken arm was a reminder that cricket is dangerous. The great hero for England was Close, absolutely fearless and indomitable.
Brilliant footage. Interesting to watch Griffith bowl...his action looks strong and muscular, but not that of a thrower
Great to see footage of Ted Dexter for those of us who were not alive to see him play. RIP.
Close looked the same then as he did against against them in 1976.
Dexter 50 in 45 minutes - England's 200 in 203 minutes and 69 overs. These days you'd be lucky to get 40 overs completed in that time.
If Sobers had bowled all his overs as spin and Gibbs had bowled more then that number of overs would be increased further.
Excellent. No stupid high fiveing after every wicket
I agree. High fiveing is all over the place now.
I can't even comprehend why there are people out there who dislike teammates showing appreciation for one another and a bit of enjoyment when succeeding. What a sad existence you must lead, if that's a problem to you
@@rorybessell8280 no problem with teammates sharing success and no sad existence. It’s sad that you perceive that because of a comment on method rather than principle. Just how it’s done now with the American high fives everywhere and queuing up to do that.
Excellent clarity to video. Thank you.
Where in heavens name did you get this footage. It's absolutely priceless!!
And such good quality for 58-year-old pictures.
Most of these players passed on.truly great players.Dont think anyone hits it harder than Dexter.Ken barrington a champiom
That was exceptional. I am curious as to how much of this the BBC still has in its locker.
And i thought shakelton was an Antarctic explorer !!. By the way, what a great catch by cowdrey .
Real cricket of 60es ..no fixing as the thieves of current era
Soul cricket.those were the days my friend.........
Classic ! The bats are like toothpicks . Seems much more a much balanced battle between bat and ball. Legends galore!
There is no lack of balance between bat and ball in test cricket now, in fact, the ball dominates the bat in the current era
Ian Chappell first saw Ted Dexter bat in the sixties. Chappell said “then I became a believer”.
Thanks Sean...wonderful piece of footage!
It is a memorable moments for me to watch this moments.
The amazing thing about The Mid 1960's in London at, say, The Oval was that England v West Indies was an AWAY game and yet over the last 50 years mass immigration has occurred and yet these days, whereas the crowd was, literally, 80%+ West Indian/Black British when those Guys were just under 2% of Londoners and now when their numbers have increased eight-fold they are only a small percentage of the crowd !
Television and ticket pricing.
Indeed and maybe the fact that THe West Indies are not so dominant as in their golden era...
@@Isleofskye There are many reasons, but remember: The people in this clip were actually from the West Indies (and brought up in a cricket-mad culture). Young Black Britons now are their great-grandchildren with far looser ties to the Caribbean and to its culture(s).
Ted had an average of 47.I think he would do well today
Just read 'On the spot', the autobiography of Derek Shackleton. How did this guy play just 7 tests? It's alluded to by the commentator on this.
I'm more confused that a bowler of that pace could ever play test cricket. Plenty of club cricketers can land it on a spot over and over but will never make even a first-class side
@@rorybessell8280 Uncovered pitches meant there was far more scope for medium pacers. Plus, putting it on the spot is not quite the same as always putting it where it's not quite there to drive against the very best.
Ground Nd pitch almost same..was era of great competitive cricket ..
At 6:25 - Lance Gibbs bowling off-spin. VERY RARE. There are no other videos of him bowling on You Tube. Interesting because at one point, he was the highest West Indian test wicket taker. Great, historical video.
Then at 7:55, the great Frank Worrell bowling. First time I have ever seen that.
There are other videos of Gibbs bowling. I would point you to the "Australia vs West Indies, Test Series 1960/61 Highlights" video which features Gibbs taking a hat trick. Plenty of Alf Valentine as well, such a lovely action.
@@soundbelch1600 Check out the vid 'Cricket in the 60's' too.
Saw lance gibbs bowl as an overseas profssinal in sunderland 1000 a season and he batted 11
No high fives for the bowler when a wicket fell in those days. No hugs and hardly any back slapping either and the most he might have expected was a cursory "well done".
At 1:40 Dexter, Close, Cowdrey, Stewart (back) and Shackleton the bowler. 3:05 Edrich & Stewart open batting against two short-legs. Do you see that nowadays?
This was the period of test cricket where everyone batted out for draws so there wasn't exactly much danger with using an attacking field
Batsman without Helmet... Amazing
There was respect then. Bouncers were only occasionally bowled at top end batsmen. The Australians changed that code.
Great spectators too.
this video clearly blasts the myth that Hall ran from the sightscreen. his was never the longest run up in the history of cricket.
Why do you make such an irrelevant comment
@@robbdavies7749 Because he now possess the false bravado akin to whoever wields the financial muscle of the day should paint the narrative of the past present and future.
Proper cricket. Proper sportsmanship. better than the silly coloured outfit , music laden , anger fuelled bollocks today.....
Well said, totally agree.
Cricketers look jokers except in Whites.
Yes indeed.
Wonderful cricket ❤
In these time there is no such interest and passion about cricket
Five shots of Dexter's innings - all after he reaches 50. I got there just after he was out........
Great footage but who was the first commentator at the end of the West Indies innings?
+Noel Petty It was Robert Hudson
As a schoolboy I used to cut pictures of these cricket heroes and paste them in old railway timetable books and feel great pleasure in showing to my friends my treasure. Great names like Wes Hall; Charlie Griffith; Ted Dexter; Ken Barrington, Colin Cowdrey. I always longed to see them in action. After so many years it is heavenly to see them in these rare footages . Only a few of them are, I suppose, alive. What a splendid trip back to childhood days!! I would also like to see Vinoo Mankad and Pauly Umrigar in action.
--- Sharad Rajimwale
1963 a memorable year in which some historic events took place: The Great Train Robbery, Kim Philby affair, Kristine Keller, assassination of President Kennedy, all thrilled the world.
The Beatles released their first no. 1 LP "Please Please Me", Bobby Moore captained England for the first time, the first episode of "Dr Who" was broadcast and I turned 12.
Griffith was a thrower . As Dexter said his fast ball was nearly unplayable because he threw it.
The action of West Indian bowlers wassudpected i feel
Great bowler Charly Griffith
wonderful cricket
Everyone looks older than they actually are.
I know look at Close, he is only 33 haha
Smoking, that's why.
Before 'A Hard Days Night'
Tip. Watch this with closed captions on.
Hilarious!
I was born one and half year after.
Jayanta Sarkar how interesting.
Good old jonners with the commentary
Excellent!
I know that Ted Dexter was a pilot of his plane also! Right?👍
Shackleton looks slower than Paul Collingwood!
Guarantee you that Shackleton (opening bowler) got through his overs quicker than some of the spinners who play nowadays!!
I aint no cricketer but Shackleton off btesk leg spin seam i dont know.
Jonners
I bet they were bowling at the speed of 150+ Kmph...
Doubt it, Hall, Griffith and Trueman would have been quick, but definitely not as rapid as fast bowlers in other periods. Apart from Trueman and Tyson (who didn't play enough), it was a pretty poor period for true, fast bowling
If the Beeb has this stuff they should Re run these tests..
grifth bolds very well by short run up
Gentlemen cricket until1975 world cup limited over. Then Vulgarism was brought in by Australia and Ian Chappell brothers and counter attack by Clive Lloyd.
If ya trust ya ability, ya don't need helmet
What a terrible shot close played feet went nowhere
Ken Barrington = Bradman
Everton Week' s average is higher than that of Sachin Tendulkar.Attn Harsha Bogle.
Sobers' ball to dismiss Dexter looks like it pitched about a foot outside leg stump.
Agreed, pretty rough decision there
All very pedestrian
In the 1960s, Windies were considered to be a minnows. In today's context, this contest would be equivalent to England playing Afghanistan or Ireland.
No that is not true. West Indies had recently played the famous tied test in Brisbane, and only narrowly lost that series down under. They won this series here in England 3-1.
No, West Indies were a force to ve reckoned with - Kanhai, Butcher, Nurse, Hunte, Griffiths, Hall, Gibbs, Worrell, and of course Gary Sobers. And that's just off the top of my head.
Farooq, that's totally false, they had some of the best players in the world and in Sobers the greatest cricketer that ever lived
Ya don't know 💩 Windies won this series !
Comment section filled with nostalgic old people.
what a ignorant low I Q txat..
Totally awful techniques in this. Like village cricket. The umpires might have a chance in today's cricket.
p/off
pix046 foggy
The bowling's absolutely sublime - really fluid actions (except for Griffith who was proper scary!?)
But the batting - Stewart, Close and Barrington all got out to shots where they didn't move their feet.
And then today's cricket is also gonna be called "village cricket" 55 years from now...... Lol..... Don't spit on your foundation.
When you don't helmets,all kinds of guards, thin pads and thinner gloves, this is how your technique looks. Try holding a bat without these against the hard cricket ball on an uncovered wicket facing atleast 130 kmph bowlers and share us your experiences.