How One Tech Monopoly Paved the Way for Another

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @hallucinatingsiren
    @hallucinatingsiren 2 місяці тому +14

    Opening antique internet-era sounds was a jump scare 😂

  • @MayorMcC666
    @MayorMcC666 2 місяці тому +4

    thinking about that video of bill jumping over the chair

  • @derpmansderpyskin
    @derpmansderpyskin 2 місяці тому +1

    Am I crazy or are these remedies a little arbitrary? Microsoft used monopoly power to suppress Netscape, in response we: split Windows off from Office? Google pays companies to make their search engine the default, in response we: split chrome and google? Split Android and google?

  • @X862go
    @X862go 2 місяці тому

    Microsoft the monopoly that got away with it.

  • @longshank59
    @longshank59 2 місяці тому +5

    I preferred Netscape far superior to Internet Explorer

  • @longshank59
    @longshank59 2 місяці тому +3

    If I could remember my AOL password I'd have 2 different verified accounts.

    • @macareuxmoine
      @macareuxmoine 2 місяці тому

      There still are AOL email accounts around 😊

  • @amandag4556
    @amandag4556 2 місяці тому

    Google sucks now, hope something changes

  • @fighterck6241
    @fighterck6241 2 місяці тому

    'Bout time.

  • @Ellerich800
    @Ellerich800 2 місяці тому +9

    There was no consumer harm. We don't need equal outcomes for companies. If Google were truly a monopoly, there would be no need to innovate. If all other competitors are locked out, Google could fire all engineers to collect way more money. I suppose the government's remedy is for Google to stop innovating because their search engine is too good. Let the competition catch up, is that the remedy?

    • @zacharyrichard2764
      @zacharyrichard2764 2 місяці тому +9

      Your argument rests on googles being good what if it isn’t so effective and useful or innovative in search. Google isn’t all that good in the other ways like UA-cam would probably be better as separate company. Edit: gen ai’s success is proof that google hasn’t been innovating past page 1 lol

    • @Ellerich800
      @Ellerich800 2 місяці тому

      @@zacharyrichard2764 Why would UA-cam being a separate company be better? I like that Google News and Search adjusts recommendations based on what I like to watch on UA-cam. It makes search, news and Gemini more useful to me. The judgement/ruling had nothing to do with UA-cam. The government didn't like Google paying Apple $20b/year to be the default search engine on an iPhone.

    • @macareuxmoine
      @macareuxmoine 2 місяці тому +7

      Wow. You’re really high on that supply. Actually there always is a cost to stifled competition. You should learn a little about free markets.

    • @zacharyrichard2764
      @zacharyrichard2764 2 місяці тому

      @@macareuxmoine gen ais success is a sign of googles failure in actual search lol what if there were just multiple viable search companies like a hypothetical future UA-cam rather than this rentierist feudal anti democratic nonsense LOL and yeah soaring cause it’s just insane how much reality resembles Fallout lol

    • @zacharyrichard2764
      @zacharyrichard2764 2 місяці тому

      @@macareuxmoinenot stifling competition actually because gen ai’s success is due to googles failures in search lol it became a trophy to them that people never went beyond the first page, they became useless to the original core function of search. UA-cam would likely if separated rise as a competitor search engine to compete and innovate even more.