I have listened to a number of interviews of the great Annie Jacobsen, and as always she shined here. However, she was barely given any time to speak on this particular podcast episode as the interviewer dominated the interview with his perspectives. He should learn how to conduct a proper interview from great podcast hosts like Lex Fridman. His three hour episode featuring Annie Jacobsen is the gold standard of interviewing!
I think the podcast is great! I think if you don't appreciate lawrence's style, then perhaps you should continue to watch lex fridmans instead of complaining.
@AFROJOE2323: When the only way the guest (i.e., Annie Jacobsen) can speak is by *apologizing* for interrupting the host, you know something is terribly terribly wrong! 🙄
I’ve heard this many times but again; Annie’s voice and calm demeanor is gentle and calming and in great contrast to her probable inevitable reality topic of self annihilating extinction. I could listen to her all day
Back in the 60’s, my dad was a nuclear ordinance officer. It was his job to launch nuclear weapons on the battlefield, with the assumption it would kill the bad guys only slightly sooner than his own weapons killed him and his team (think nuclear howitzer). We talked about that time when I was an adult, and his weapons system no longer classified. He told me he thought the only thing that worried him was if a nuke was in the hands of someone with nothing left to lose. Russians loved their country, their history; they wouldn’t want to see the Kremlin melting in nuclear fire, any more than he would want to see the Jefferson Memorial atomized. If the leaders were sane, responsible men, who would want to find a way not to kill everyone, we were safe. But he said, “Baby, what scares me is if someone is backed into a corner - maybe about to get dragged out of office and sent to a gulag, or shot in a show trial in Peking. You get the wrong guy, nothing to lose, he could just decide to take us all with him.” My dad’s long gone, but I think of that often these days…an irrational madman, or a man who is ill with no cure, or maybe someone in power who just has a suicidal impulse and decides today’s the day, they won’t lose to whatever group is threatening them and so he sends death into the sky. And no way to call them back.
Doing science, like “doing” the imaginative use of words (poetry, on one definition) is at base also thinking imaginatively. Of course that won’t exist if Annie’s take is plausible.
Thank you, Lawrence Krauss, for having author and journalist with this discourse of nuclear war and the Doomsday scnernario . Congratulations on your new book, Annie. The only suggestion I may offer is Iian McGilchrist's books and lectures, " The Emissary and His Master, " The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World," The Matter With Things," Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World," 2 volumes (2010) In these books , Dr. Iian McGilchrist shares with other scholars in various fields of philosophy, sciences, history, literature, and art in how th change course the direction we have created over centuries of wars and divisions, be it philosophical, religious, or how the left and right side of our brains works. With the deepest appreciation and respect to both of you for keeping the awareness of the destruction, our powers of greed have got it terribly wrong. Human life and nature may we listen together and grow with empathy and joy for everyone. "Nature loves to hide." Heraclitus 🙏❤️🌍🌏🌎🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵💫✨️💫✨️
"A plan is useless. Planning is everything". ~ Dwight D Isenhower This quote speaks volumes on flexibility to me. It is my favorite. I often see remarks on the internet some trying to explain it away by referencing it's context as though afraid... as if he was saying, "Don't plan". The quote needs no context.
How do you imagine achieving this when the most powerful country in the world has to choose a president from such candidates as Biden and Trump. The world seems to be doomed.
Lawrence, this episode was quite frustrating. WHY did you even invite Annie Jacobsen? You talked for 15 minutes straight, then gave her a minute to speak before interrupting and taking over again. This wasn't a podcast conversation with an esteemed guest; it was you monologuing with Annie as a prop to back you up. You could have simply talked about her book yourself and had her introduce it separately, then stitched the two parts together. I like the channel and enjoy listening to you while I'm editing, so you talking isn't the issue. You talking 80% while your guest talks 20% is!
I don't know if you read these comments or not, but it would be a perfect follow-up to interview Jake Broe. He's a previous ICBM missileer and could fill inn many details that you missed out in this mostly excellent dialogue.
"Ive narrowed them down to 5 unthinkable options" "Number 3" "You dont wanna read them first?" "I was elected to lead not to read, number 3!" If you know you know
One wonders, as I have often wondered and been frustratingly puzzled by is why in this world, in this existence and place in time, the voices of people with knowledge, intellegence and wisdom such as we are hearing here are drowned out, relagated to the sidelines, ignored etc., and those in of lesser mind (even childish mentalities as we are now experiencing) in positions of power who ignore, sideline and denegrate these important voices, instead hold sway and influence in media and among the populace of so many countries. We are truly living in an upside down world.
fyi.. Somewhat sophisticated, city-leveling nuclear device is no bigger than a public school classroom fire extinguisher. Very difficult to detect. I lived with 48 of them inside missile tubes and never got a click on my side of the launch tube. Using DOD grade beta/gamma and neutron detectors.
One problem with being a scientist is that when one is constantly in the company of highly intelligent people it is easy to forget just how stupid the average human really is. This often leads to what can seem like amusingly naive optimism about the motivations & morality of others due judging those outside that tiny bubble based on the mental acuity of those within it. One does not become a dictator by being smart. One becomes a dictator by being ruthless and paranoid. That such individuals would do the smart, logical or rational thing in any situation is not something that I'd wager money on.
I see what you are saying. But how can we get rid of our nuclear weapons unless we are certain that everyone else is doing the same? People don’t trust each other. This is the root of the problem. We need a new generation of leaders and a new world peace movement. Once the people of all the country’s of the world get tired of this madness it will end.
This is a difficult but necessary conversation. Humanity can end anytime the way things are going on with geopolitics with the US in endless wars. My only problem is that the discussion proceeded on the basis of the enemy initiating the nuclear missles and the US is the victim. Therefore, war mongers will clamour for more fund to modernise its nuclear arsenal, again feeding the weapons industry. The only way for humanity to survive is to build greater trust and understanding between nations and engage in more diplomacy. We need an anti-war movement to ensure that the war mongers do not have the upper hand.
Have you ever seen pictures from russia's mass graves in occupied Ukraine? I have seen some, with grandmothers, kids and other civilians. I'm not even allowed to describe them on youtube, but you can stuff your butt with your russian 'peace'. It's nothing else than ISIS with nukes.
This lady is everywhere all of a sudden, but please listen to what she has to say. I've been consumed with nuclear Armageddon my entire life since age 6... it has consumed my nightmares and focus. Understand that people with power in this country DON"T understand this stuff, they don't know the first thing about it and they provide support for clicking the nuke button more efficiently quicker. There are people in politics, who have a wish for end of world, as their book promises them somehow. Belief in magic, and being magically saved fuels focus in the white house. Please listen. Peace ☮💜Love
Something makes a bit of noise about the proposal to do with North Corea attacking the US, but the US not retaliating to them.... but Rusia? In this scenario why North Corea keeps attacking the USA after they detect (1 second later) they launch a ICBM? Doesn't make sense.
Looking for a story. You already have it. Yet the nuances that would reflect the emotional context of the story became a Maria Antoinette perspective in the future. Let the future eat bread.
According to a Chinese academic, detonating around 400 atomic bombs could wipe out humanity. This estimate is based on calculations that assume the same effect as the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which could destroy around 2 billion lives. So why do we need any more than say 20 nuclear weapons or 30 or 10? Because if we launch and Russia launches and Israel, launches and Pakistan launches and United Kingdom and France launches The entire planet is annihilated So what’s the point of 1700 or 1600 nuclear weapons with an arsenal of another 2000 sitting in a warehouse ? It’s freaking pointless. There is no winner in nuclear war so having more weapons is a pointless path to follow Everybody on the planet, even those who have no aggression towards anybody fall victim If any president in the future has the balls to say, I’m dropping our nuclear arsenal down to 50 weapons Who knows what the results might be globally. Because even at 50 American weapons, the entire planet would be destroyed
Of course they first thought a nuclear bomb would set the atmosphere on fire so why would we think anyone exactly knows how devastating nuclear war would be. Chernobyl is in full bloom.
The introductionary photograph on UA-cam shows you both side-by-side , convinced you’re the same person on the left with a wig and on the right without it
The art of presenting the audience with an enlightening discussion is to coerce the guest into revealing their insights and expertise. Allowing them to do most of the talking by feeding them with a short question has proven to be a good technique.
I don’t think nuclear war is a matter of time. I think a nuclear weapon MIGHT be used again by someone in the next 10 years but I don’t think nuclear war is inevitable. I can’t think that. If I thought that I would just give up on life. And I am well versed in what would happen in such a full scale war. In 1967 the United States had a book about what exactly would happen in the event of nuclear war. It was declassified in 1992 and I read it. It’s much worse than you could probably possibly imagine. The lucky people will be the ones that are vaporized instantly.
I will continue in regard to our current candidates for President. Obviously a Person who is President who will work to avoid nuclear war at all costs will be a person who will seek negotiation rather than provocation to settle disagreements peacefully. The person who is more likely to foment nuclear war is the person who will eschew negotiation, avoid it at all costs, and actively provoke an adversary, pushing them into a corner from which they can do nothing but respond with a heavy military hand. Currently Democrats in control of the White House fit this latter description 100% and their current candidate is Vice President. WTAF are we walking into with this election? 😵💫
What is interesting is that these nuclear arsenals have supposedly been built because of differences in economic ideologies and yet no one can advocate mandatory accounting in the schools or tally the annual depreciation of durable consumer goods. Can scientists figure out planned obsolescence in automobiles? LOL
Stop the gaslighting, Annie. There's no madman in North Korea. The madman is in Washington. Right now he's having a wargame in the Korean peninsular and poking the bear in Ukraine.
Huh? russia has threatened to use nukes all over the place for several years. Except for north korea and russia. No one else has threatened to nuke anyone for decades.
Is humanity's established nuclear warfare capabilities any more insane and incomprehensible than our ecological conundrum or our egregious income disparities? It seems that, as a species, we have bungled every opportunity to do wiser things. Instead of ever-greater cohesion and wisdom we are reverting gut-level tribalism not seen since the "stone age".
:Progress' starts with being honest & loyal to the facts when discussing these grave matters. It has been the US exclusively that unilaterally withdrew from arms control treaties and doesn't include a raft of other international agreements it withdrew from throughout the same period. It started with Bush in 2002 who withdraw the US from the ABM treaty. Trump followed suit by withdrawing from the INF Treaty in 2019 & the OST in 2020. Russia has been the mature & rational actor throughout.
At least the ambassadors from Russia and the United States have not been withdrawn. The Russian ambassador in still in DC and the Russian ambassador is still in Moscow.
Lawrence had a lot of useful information and thoughts to add, so I don't see your problem. You can always buy and read the book if you want to know it in detail.
At aaround 25:20, concering the 'call back' of nuclear weapons and what Reagan thought, with my limited level of knowledge of the nuclear force triad, I think what you are talking about when you're talking about 'recalling' a nuclear weapon is actually _recalling strategic bombers carrying nuclear bombs to be dropped._ Obiviously, nuclear missles cannot be recalled--whether they are land based _or submarine launched_ Reagan likely was talking about strategic bombers, not ICBMs (Although with Reagan and the Republican mind, you may be right about him not knowing.)
You keep saying it's "INSANE", etc. but Russia's policy is perfectly SANE considering the Western penchant for dominance, and backed by historic colonialism and theft. It's the only language the West will understand.
We do have interceptors that can and do intercept ballistic missiles in their mid course and terminal phase. The ones that target the mid course phase aren’t very effective. 52% success rate. ICBMs are harder to shoot down this is true. But on the whole it’s useless.
The United States can shoot down a rogue ballistic missile or 2 or 3 from North Korea. We have interceptors right now in Alaska, California, and Guam specifically because of North Korea. These interceptors I think there are 50 of them in total can shoot down ballistic missiles In their mid course phase so right after the boost phase and before the terminal phase. These missiles aren’t perfect and are about 60% success rate so at least 2 per ballistic missile would have to be launched. In the terminal phase we have Patriot Missiles and THAAD throughout the country. THAAD is in Texas I know for sure not sure where else it can shoot down warheads in their terminal phase our to about 500 miles and they are very accurate. It’s easier to shoot them down in their terminal phase. And if for whatever reason THAAD is unsuccessful we have Patriot which again is VERY accurate. But this is only going to work for a couple of rogue missiles from North Korea or somewhere else. In a full scale war with Russia these defenses would be overwhelmed pretty quickly and while some would be intercepted most would not. It’s a very small comfort at lease. We need a new mass peace movement to sweep the world. Biden will win re election and the Democrats will take back the House of Representatives in November. If this I have little doubts. We need to relegate the maga fascist movement to the dustbin of history. And Putin must be stippped. He must be stopped and he must go if you know what I mean. Russia isn’t going to use a nuclear weapon. I think the chances of that are extraordinarily low. But an accident is what I worry about. In 1983 nuclear war was averted because 1 Russian Colonel did not do as he was told and did not obey orders. His radar said there was a full scale attack by the US underway and his orders were to launch his missiles. He didn’t. It turns out it was geese migrations up to Canada that was mistaken for a missile attack. Most people don’t know about this. EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW. If not for this Russian Colonol disobeying orders civilization would have ended. We need a new peace movement. We need to formally declare we have a no first use policy. China has this policy.
LET YOUR GUEST SPEAK AND STOP TALKING ABOUT YOURSELF! When the guest has to apologize for saying something, you know that your interviewing has gone off the rails. Despite the excellent guests, I had stopped listen to the Origins Podcast because Dr. Krauss' constant telling us "when I was chair..." "when I I I ...." I thought that my now he might have learned his lesson, but if anything he's gotten worse. I'm done with this podcast.... again.
Reminds me of the scene at a missle silo in The Day After right after the weapons are launched and one soldier is trying to keep the soldiers at the silo, and one guys says, “man the war is over. You’re asking me to defend a cotton picking’ hole in the ground.”
Great podcast and I think you did a good job. I’m gonna point out something that all of your viewers are probably noticing maybe have have not told you. You need to trim your hair because that is all. I’m seeing what I’m watching and listening to this podcast.
1500 weapons on hair trigger alert status to be exact Lawrence. And only 450 of them are in silos in the United States. The minutman 3 ICBM can hold and deploy up to 3 warheads but we are treaty limited to have only 1 on them now. Although I think Russia withdrew from that treaty so I don’t know now. The rest are on Ohio class ballistic missile submarines of which we have 14 that carry 16 treaty limited missiles but the subs can carry 20 missiles and the Trudident SLBM’s in the subs are of 2 varieties. Some of them have up to 14 warheads and others have 7. And the rest are deployed with Bombers and yes we have forward deployed weapons in Europe. There are US nuclear gravity bombs in England, Germany, and Italy and tumoured to be in Poland too. Our submarine force by itself would be enough to totally destroy Russia. We still have more ballistic missile subs than the Russians. A lot more. It is the ultimate weapon and keeps the peace. Russia could completely wipe out the continental United States and Russia would still be utterly destroyed. And I head they are loading the subs back with 20 missiles be air again Russia chose to withdraw from a treaty we signed. And as part of that treaty we got rid of all of our nuclear tipped Tomahawk cruise missiles. They are coming back. And the B-52’s can carry 22 Air Launched Cruise missiles with a range of 1700 miles and the missiles have a fail a yield warhead meaning it can be pre selected to have a 5 KT blast or a 50 kt blast. A 16 kt blast destroyed Hiroshima Japan and a 20 Kt blast destroyed Navgasaki.
This would be a great subject for a grownup Doctor Who to tackle, you know someone like David Bradley playing the role of William Hartnell's Doctor Who.
Let me bring an optimistic point of view. For those of us who looking to buy our first house, I bet property values will go down.
Yes, but not for lack of landlords trying to raise them
Frankly, I am glad I am 76yo. Not much time left anyway. My heart bleeds for my 39 nieces and nephews and their kids. They have No Idea!
There will be total devastation.
I have listened to a number of interviews of the great Annie Jacobsen, and as always she shined here. However, she was barely given any time to speak on this particular podcast episode as the interviewer dominated the interview with his perspectives. He should learn how to conduct a proper interview from great podcast hosts like Lex Fridman. His three hour episode featuring Annie Jacobsen is the gold standard of interviewing!
Well you have to understand that Lawrence considers himself to be the main attraction of any interview or discussion. That’s how he rolls.
I think the podcast is great! I think if you don't appreciate lawrence's style, then perhaps you should continue to watch lex fridmans instead of complaining.
Lex is a relentless yawnathon.
@AFROJOE2323: When the only way the guest (i.e., Annie Jacobsen) can speak is by *apologizing* for interrupting the host, you know something is terribly terribly wrong! 🙄
@robertjulianoph.d.1423 if you thought this was bad, go listen to Joe rogans recent episode with Annie. At least this guy stayed on topic
One of the very "best" podcasts thanks to The Origins Podcast. Bravo!
I’ve heard this many times but again; Annie’s voice and calm demeanor is gentle and calming and in great contrast to her probable inevitable reality topic of self annihilating extinction.
I could listen to her all day
Back in the 60’s, my dad was a nuclear ordinance officer. It was his job to launch nuclear weapons on the battlefield, with the assumption it would kill the bad guys only slightly sooner than his own weapons killed him and his team (think nuclear howitzer). We talked about that time when I was an adult, and his weapons system no longer classified. He told me he thought the only thing that worried him was if a nuke was in the hands of someone with nothing left to lose. Russians loved their country, their history; they wouldn’t want to see the Kremlin melting in nuclear fire, any more than he would want to see the Jefferson Memorial atomized. If the leaders were sane, responsible men, who would want to find a way not to kill everyone, we were safe. But he said, “Baby, what scares me is if someone is backed into a corner - maybe about to get dragged out of office and sent to a gulag, or shot in a show trial in Peking. You get the wrong guy, nothing to lose, he could just decide to take us all with him.” My dad’s long gone, but I think of that often these days…an irrational madman, or a man who is ill with no cure, or maybe someone in power who just has a suicidal impulse and decides today’s the day, they won’t lose to whatever group is threatening them and so he sends death into the sky. And no way to call them back.
LK: "yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak, yak." ... "Maybe you can talk about this a little bit as well."
As nuclear weapons become more avalaible to more countries around the world, nuclear war is just a matter of time.
Russell (Bertrand) thought so. No dummy.
Doing science, like “doing” the imaginative use of words (poetry, on one definition) is at base also thinking imaginatively. Of course that won’t exist if Annie’s take is plausible.
MAD: makes no sense, obviously. The residue of a competitive, profit-driven mindset, where that mindset meets the military industrial complex.
Important to note the world wont end, the human race will. Our planet was here before and will be long after we've gone.
We’ll… that’s reassuring
it would be better of without us. humans are just a tiny blip in planets evolution. we are Dodo birds
Why do you have a guest?
Had to order her book after running out of free audiobook time on Spotify.
Thank you, Lawrence Krauss, for having author and journalist with this discourse of nuclear war and the Doomsday scnernario .
Congratulations on your new book, Annie.
The only suggestion I may offer is Iian McGilchrist's books and lectures, " The Emissary and His Master, " The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World," The Matter With Things," Our Brains, Our Delusions and the Unmaking of the World," 2 volumes (2010)
In these books , Dr. Iian McGilchrist shares with other scholars in various fields of philosophy, sciences, history, literature, and art in how th change course the direction we have created over centuries of wars and divisions, be it philosophical, religious, or how the left and right side of our brains works.
With the deepest appreciation and respect to both of you for keeping the awareness of the destruction, our powers of greed have got it terribly wrong.
Human life and nature may we listen together and grow with empathy and joy for everyone.
"Nature loves to hide."
Heraclitus
🙏❤️🌍🌏🌎🌿🕊🎵🎶🎵💫✨️💫✨️
"A plan is useless. Planning is everything". ~ Dwight D Isenhower
This quote speaks volumes on flexibility to me. It is my favorite.
I often see remarks on the internet some trying to explain it away by referencing it's context as though afraid...
as if he was saying, "Don't plan". The quote needs no context.
Disappointed with this “interview”. He did all the talking and the author barely got a word in.
As a species, we need to grow up and do away with violence and warfare.
How do you imagine achieving this when the most powerful country in the world has to choose a president from such candidates as Biden and Trump. The world seems to be doomed.
@@vykintasmorkvenas6839 Well said lol... well said.
We will literally never completely do away with violence and war.
Thank you very much for the great podcast.
Lawrence, this episode was quite frustrating. WHY did you even invite Annie Jacobsen? You talked for 15 minutes straight, then gave her a minute to speak before interrupting and taking over again. This wasn't a podcast conversation with an esteemed guest; it was you monologuing with Annie as a prop to back you up. You could have simply talked about her book yourself and had her introduce it separately, then stitched the two parts together. I like the channel and enjoy listening to you while I'm editing, so you talking isn't the issue. You talking 80% while your guest talks 20% is!
Because Krauss is a bauss..😎
I don't know if you read these comments or not, but it would be a perfect follow-up to interview Jake Broe. He's a previous ICBM missileer and could fill inn many details that you missed out in this mostly excellent dialogue.
this is fascinating and terrifying
"Ive narrowed them down to 5 unthinkable options"
"Number 3"
"You dont wanna read them first?"
"I was elected to lead not to read, number 3!"
If you know you know
With the way "humans" think, I'm surprised it hasn't already happened. But, what's the downside?
I would have liked to hear more from this fascinating guest and far less from the host. I’ll buy the book!
.. that's truly scary. Unthinkable. And if you survived the initial blasts you will wish you hadn't.
Enlightened, and scared shitless. Ordered the book.
“ The nuclear arms race is like two sworn enemies standing waist deep in gasoline, one with three matches, the other with five.” -Carl Sagan.
In the 1990’s and 2000’s we thought the danger had passed.
One of Senator Edward Kennedy's favorite defense budget hearing quips, "How high to you want the rubble to bounce."
One wonders, as I have often wondered and been frustratingly puzzled by is why in this world, in this existence and place in time, the voices of people with knowledge, intellegence and wisdom such as we are hearing here are drowned out, relagated to the sidelines, ignored etc., and those in of lesser mind (even childish mentalities as we are now experiencing) in positions of power who ignore, sideline and denegrate these important voices, instead hold sway and influence in media and among the populace of so many countries. We are truly living in an upside down world.
fyi.. Somewhat sophisticated, city-leveling nuclear device is no bigger than a public school classroom fire extinguisher. Very difficult to detect. I lived with 48 of them inside missile tubes and never got a click on my side of the launch tube. Using DOD grade beta/gamma and neutron detectors.
Finally a useful comment. Thumbs up.
27:36 when you take telecommunications out of the equation the world hasn't changed that much.
I still do NOT believe it will happen.
Keep guessing that
One problem with being a scientist is that when one is constantly in the company of highly intelligent people it is easy to forget just how stupid the average human really is. This often leads to what can seem like amusingly naive optimism about the motivations & morality of others due judging those outside that tiny bubble based on the mental acuity of those within it. One does not become a dictator by being smart. One becomes a dictator by being ruthless and paranoid. That such individuals would do the smart, logical or rational thing in any situation is not something that I'd wager money on.
OMG Lawrence. Please. SHUT UP and let your guest speak!! The time you spoke vs. Anne is at least 2-1!
"precisely"
I see what you are saying. But how can we get rid of our nuclear weapons unless we are certain that everyone else is doing the same? People don’t trust each other. This is the root of the problem. We need a new generation of leaders and a new world peace movement. Once the people of all the country’s of the world get tired of this madness it will end.
That’s the question I wish someone would ask her.
This is a difficult but necessary conversation. Humanity can end anytime the way things are going on with geopolitics with the US in endless wars.
My only problem is that the discussion proceeded on the basis of the enemy initiating the nuclear missles and the US is the victim. Therefore, war mongers will clamour for more fund to modernise its nuclear arsenal, again feeding the weapons industry.
The only way for humanity to survive is to build greater trust and understanding between nations and engage in more diplomacy. We need an anti-war movement to ensure that the war mongers do not have the upper hand.
Have you ever seen pictures from russia's mass graves in occupied Ukraine? I have seen some, with grandmothers, kids and other civilians. I'm not even allowed to describe them on youtube, but you can stuff your butt with your russian 'peace'. It's nothing else than ISIS with nukes.
This lady is everywhere all of a sudden, but please listen to what she has to say. I've been consumed with nuclear Armageddon my entire life since age 6... it has consumed my nightmares and focus. Understand that people with power in this country DON"T understand this stuff, they don't know the first thing about it and they provide support for clicking the nuke button more efficiently quicker. There are people in politics, who have a wish for end of world, as their book promises them somehow. Belief in magic, and being magically saved fuels focus in the white house. Please listen. Peace ☮💜Love
It's not often mentioned that once the power goes out, the Nation's 54 nuclear power plants would all eventually meltdown.
Whoa!
Annie can phrase that for layman and so can Larry. The small difference Larry knows what he is talking about.
Too bad she wasn't interviewed, just a viewer as we were.
Something makes a bit of noise about the proposal to do with North Corea attacking the US, but the US not retaliating to them.... but Rusia? In this scenario why North Corea keeps attacking the USA after they detect (1 second later) they launch a ICBM? Doesn't make sense.
Looking for a story. You already have it. Yet the nuances that would reflect the emotional context of the story became a Maria Antoinette perspective in the future. Let the future eat bread.
According to a Chinese academic, detonating around 400 atomic bombs could wipe out humanity. This estimate is based on calculations that assume the same effect as the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, which could destroy around 2 billion lives.
So why do we need any more than say 20 nuclear weapons or 30 or 10?
Because if we launch and Russia launches and Israel, launches and Pakistan launches and United Kingdom and France launches The entire planet is annihilated
So what’s the point of 1700 or 1600 nuclear weapons with an arsenal of another 2000 sitting in a warehouse ? It’s freaking pointless.
There is no winner in nuclear war so having more weapons is a pointless path to follow
Everybody on the planet, even those who have no aggression towards anybody fall victim
If any president in the future has the balls to say, I’m dropping our nuclear arsenal down to 50 weapons Who knows what the results might be globally. Because even at 50 American weapons, the entire planet would be destroyed
I read the book...this is not "fiction" folks...why do none of us know these publically available facts?
Last I read on this topic…which admittedly was years ago…the results of the high altitude EMP was theoretical.
Has that been confirmed now?
That is why I always wear clean underwear. Just in case.
Of course they first thought a nuclear bomb would set the atmosphere on fire so why would we think anyone exactly knows how devastating nuclear war would be. Chernobyl is in full bloom.
Larry needs to let his ego go and allow Annie to present her work.
The introductionary photograph on UA-cam shows you both side-by-side , convinced you’re the same person on the left with a wig and on the right without it
Well, there's a happy thought....
But Adversaries dont play by the rules so how long do you really have when there are sub's stationed off shore.
As a rude interrupter would rather yak himself, Lawrence is second only to Dan Ariely. The worst ever. A legend in his own mind.
The art of presenting the audience with an enlightening discussion is to coerce the guest into revealing their insights and expertise. Allowing them to do most of the talking by feeding them with a short question has proven to be a good technique.
I don’t think nuclear war is a matter of time. I think a nuclear weapon MIGHT be used again by someone in the next 10 years but I don’t think nuclear war is inevitable. I can’t think that. If I thought that I would just give up on life. And I am well versed in what would happen in such a full scale war. In 1967 the United States had a book about what exactly would happen in the event of nuclear war. It was declassified in 1992 and I read it. It’s much worse than you could probably possibly imagine. The lucky people will be the ones that are vaporized instantly.
Its inevitable
@@AFROJOE2323 Nope
Her voice is so soothing I would love to hear a bedtime story from her. 🤣🤣🤣
I will continue in regard to our current candidates for President. Obviously a Person who is President who will work to avoid nuclear war at all costs will be a person who will seek negotiation rather than provocation to settle disagreements peacefully. The person who is more likely to foment nuclear war is the person who will eschew negotiation, avoid it at all costs, and actively provoke an adversary, pushing them into a corner from which they can do nothing but respond with a heavy military hand. Currently Democrats in control of the White House fit this latter description 100% and their current candidate is Vice President. WTAF are we walking into with this election? 😵💫
mr. Kraus please let the lady talk
Buy the book. And read it. Problem solved.
59:13 This describes all the contradictory crap we were told during Covid.
What is interesting is that these nuclear arsenals have supposedly been built because of differences in economic ideologies and yet no one can advocate mandatory accounting in the schools or tally the annual depreciation of durable consumer goods.
Can scientists figure out planned obsolescence in automobiles? LOL
Stop the gaslighting, Annie. There's no madman in North Korea. The madman is in Washington. Right now he's having a wargame in the Korean peninsular and poking the bear in Ukraine.
Maybe the world will end because the people who talked about it did it with smirky, know-it-all smiles on their faces. Thanks for killing us .
Her voice was muted for few seconds, wonder what she was saying
Every thing I see by Annie Jacobsen is very vague and like shes trying to turn a short story into a 400 page book
Humans have always been MADD!
We are lucky that Russia is more level headed than America when it comes to nuclear war
Huh? russia has threatened to use nukes all over the place for several years. Except for north korea and russia. No one else has threatened to nuke anyone for decades.
Is humanity's established nuclear warfare capabilities any more insane and incomprehensible than our ecological conundrum or our egregious income disparities? It seems that, as a species, we have bungled every opportunity to do wiser things. Instead of ever-greater cohesion and wisdom we are reverting gut-level tribalism not seen since the "stone age".
Not with a whimper but with a bang?
:Progress' starts with being honest & loyal to the facts when discussing these grave matters. It has been the US exclusively that unilaterally withdrew from arms control treaties and doesn't include a raft of other international agreements it withdrew from throughout the same period. It started with Bush in 2002 who withdraw the US from the ABM treaty. Trump followed suit by withdrawing from the INF Treaty in 2019 & the OST in 2020. Russia has been the mature & rational actor throughout.
i miss watching startrek
Jacobsen, all over the place touted as nuclear war 'expert'.
At least the ambassadors from Russia and the United States have not been withdrawn. The Russian ambassador in still in DC and the Russian ambassador is still in Moscow.
Good podcast but would have liked to hear more from Annie Jacobson. If Lawrence hasn't learned to bite his tongue by now it'll never happen...
Lawrence had a lot of useful information and thoughts to add, so I don't see your problem. You can always buy and read the book if you want to know it in detail.
for the love of god, Lawrence, let your guest speak. I love your channel, but enough is enough man.
At aaround 25:20, concering the 'call back' of nuclear weapons and what Reagan thought, with my limited level of knowledge of the nuclear force triad, I think what you are talking about when you're talking about 'recalling' a nuclear weapon is actually _recalling strategic bombers carrying nuclear bombs to be dropped._
Obiviously, nuclear missles cannot be recalled--whether they are land based _or submarine launched_ Reagan likely was talking about strategic bombers, not ICBMs (Although with Reagan and the Republican mind, you may be right about him not knowing.)
Listen and Learn. Then Weep.
Stop talking about yourself and let your guests free
You keep saying it's "INSANE", etc. but Russia's policy is perfectly SANE considering the Western penchant for dominance, and backed by historic colonialism and theft. It's the only language the West will understand.
We do have interceptors that can and do intercept ballistic missiles in their mid course and terminal phase. The ones that target the mid course phase aren’t very effective. 52% success rate. ICBMs are harder to shoot down this is true. But on the whole it’s useless.
The United States can shoot down a rogue ballistic missile or 2 or 3 from North Korea. We have interceptors right now in Alaska, California, and Guam specifically because of North Korea. These interceptors I think there are 50 of them in total can shoot down ballistic missiles In their mid course phase so right after the boost phase and before the terminal phase. These missiles aren’t perfect and are about 60% success rate so at least 2 per ballistic missile would have to be launched. In the terminal phase we have Patriot Missiles and THAAD throughout the country. THAAD is in Texas I know for sure not sure where else it can shoot down warheads in their terminal phase our to about 500 miles and they are very accurate. It’s easier to shoot them down in their terminal phase. And if for whatever reason THAAD is unsuccessful we have Patriot which again is VERY accurate. But this is only going to work for a couple of rogue missiles from
North Korea or somewhere else. In a full scale war with Russia these defenses would be overwhelmed pretty quickly and while some would be intercepted most would not. It’s a very small comfort at lease. We need a new mass peace movement to sweep the world. Biden will win re election and the Democrats will take back the House of Representatives in November. If this I have little doubts. We need to relegate the maga fascist movement to the dustbin of history. And Putin must be stippped. He must be stopped and he must go if you know what I mean. Russia isn’t going to use a nuclear weapon. I think the chances of that are extraordinarily low. But an accident is what I worry about. In 1983 nuclear war was averted because 1 Russian Colonel did not do as he was told and did not obey orders. His radar said there was a full scale attack by the US underway and his orders were to launch his missiles. He didn’t. It turns out it was geese migrations up to Canada that was mistaken for a missile attack. Most people don’t know about this. EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW. If not for this Russian Colonol disobeying orders civilization would have ended. We need a new peace movement. We need to formally declare we have a no first use policy. China has this policy.
So it's going to happen is what you're telling us
LET YOUR GUEST SPEAK AND STOP TALKING ABOUT YOURSELF! When the guest has to apologize for saying something, you know that your interviewing has gone off the rails. Despite the excellent guests, I had stopped listen to the Origins Podcast because Dr. Krauss' constant telling us "when I was chair..." "when I I I ...." I thought that my now he might have learned his lesson, but if anything he's gotten worse. I'm done with this podcast.... again.
Anti Missile lasers and masers travel at light speed. Soon missile attack will be useless.
The nuke's are end of the war, not the beginning .
Reminds me of the scene at a missle silo in The Day After right after the weapons are launched and one soldier is trying to keep the soldiers at the silo, and one guys says, “man the war is over. You’re asking me to defend a cotton picking’ hole in the ground.”
Get the museums and archives out of D.C. I hate driving past the Pentagon to get to the Smithsonian anyway.
Great podcast and I think you did a good job. I’m gonna point out something that all of your viewers are probably noticing maybe have have not told you. You need to trim your hair because that is all. I’m seeing what I’m watching and listening to this podcast.
Krauss's hair is majestic and wizardry. Every hair is perfectly placed..😎👌
❤❤
Thank you for a good and important podcast. But what's the thing with all the russian trolls, bots and peaceniks in the comment section?
1500 weapons on hair trigger alert status to be exact Lawrence. And only 450 of them are in silos in the United States. The minutman 3 ICBM can hold and deploy up to 3 warheads but we are treaty limited to have only 1 on them now. Although I think Russia withdrew from that treaty so I don’t know now. The rest are on Ohio class ballistic missile submarines of which we have 14 that carry 16 treaty limited missiles but the subs can carry 20 missiles and the Trudident SLBM’s in the subs are of 2 varieties. Some of them have up to 14 warheads and others have 7. And the rest are deployed with Bombers and yes we have forward deployed weapons in Europe. There are US nuclear gravity bombs in England, Germany, and Italy and tumoured to be in Poland too. Our submarine force by itself would be enough to totally destroy Russia. We still have more ballistic missile subs than the Russians. A lot more. It is the ultimate weapon and keeps the peace. Russia could completely wipe out the continental United States and Russia would still be utterly destroyed. And I head they are loading the subs back with 20 missiles be air again Russia chose to withdraw from a treaty we signed. And as part of that treaty we got rid of all of our nuclear tipped Tomahawk cruise missiles. They are coming back. And the B-52’s can carry 22 Air Launched Cruise missiles with a range of 1700 miles and the missiles have a fail a yield warhead meaning it can be pre selected to have a 5 KT blast or a 50 kt blast. A 16 kt blast destroyed Hiroshima Japan and a 20 Kt blast destroyed Navgasaki.
👍
Within one minute Krauss said ‘I’ thousand times , typical atheist
this guy talks way to much let Annie speak about her own book!!!
This would be a great subject for a grownup Doctor Who to tackle, you know someone like David Bradley playing the role of William Hartnell's Doctor Who.
Let the woman talk.
gotta let WHOPPR play tictac toe
terrible edit. Monologue by LK
1:12
Aso que haveis metidi al cirinel diaz caela a crrerse lo del bbva
lego
Donald Trump Space Force
Sexiest voice, hubba❤
This episode is a shit show