He is not yelling, why are you saying that when we all can see he is not ??? He is passionate trying to convince the jury of his client’s innocence. Imagine listening to a story told by you … that’s why people should always take anything “with a grain of salt “
@@rec.thecriticwell supposedly Wendi had nothing to do with it, but she testified. Bare minimum Donna is in those phone conversations and she could testify to "clear up" any "misunderstandings" in those. To speak on her sons behalf and try to help get him out of trouble, that'd be another good reason to testify. I think we all know why she wouldn't though. Shes next.
I don’t think it would have mattered who testified in Charlie’s defense in Tallahassee. I don’t think a Addelson can get a fair trial there. This case is going on 10 years, who in that town hasn’t heard about it or formed an opinion on their guilt.
Less than 4 hours deliberation just shows you what a fantastic job the prosecution team did 👏 jobs not done yet 😮 donna someone's knocking at your door 😅
How did anyone know Dan Markel's address and his routine? If it didn't come from the Adelson's? Who had the most to gain from the murder? Who had the money for the hit? Common sense. Sit down defense.
The problem, Mr Rashbaum, is that the puzzle pieces DID fit. Ms Cappleman took all the little pieces and put them together, and they gave the true and complete picture of an entitled family who considered themselves above the law. They put their faith in money and privilege, and it failed them. The bumpkins of Tallahassee may not have much money or privilege, but what they did have was discernment and insight. They weren't hoodwinked by a fancy tale that had no logic. So who won? Not the Adelsons.
As we discussed in Jury selection, Charlie is innocent because .... as they say, family is everything. A family who commits the crime together deserves to do the time together. Wendi & Donna sent Charlie. Harvey knew all along. Charlie sent Katie. Katie sent Sigfredo. Like Dan, Sig was a father who fell for a diabolical woman but took Dan's life and is now doing life. Now, Charlie faces life in prison. The circle is almost full. Wendi, Donna, and Harvey are next. Wendi played dumb. Unlike Dan's family, none of Charlie's family members showed up to support him because Donna & Harvey planned on pleading the 5th - HIS OWN FAWKING PARENTS, mind you... Wendi only showed up to testify to try to save her own arse because all four culprits are GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY. I was SO relieved to find out the Jury got it right. They did a fabulous job. Fry in HELL Charlie. Can't WAIT for Donna's, Wendi's, and Harvey's indictment, although Harvey might get away with it.
That is the basic idea. And two different extortions. The weird thing is that everybody had the gut feeling that Donna's extortion was not a real one, that it was the cops looking into tripping them up. But they were not worried. They thought they were untouchable, and look where it has brought them...
That made no sense. Maybe if she had said from the beginning "I am so good in bed that he was paying to have me." it would have made some type of sense. People do that.
She made up stories. Then she had to admit that she lied. it was all a mess. It's not a good look if she has to admit that she has lied twice under oath.
The problem with the defense theory is….the defense theory. It’s to complicated, convenient. It’s like that game “Jenga” where u have to stack pieces of wood on top of one another. The PROBLEM is that if even one of the pieces comes lose the whole story comes crashing down.
Stop rashbaum you are letting a murderer off the hook. Sigfredo was a lose cannon drugs and drink but he was not an extortionist did not even know how to ring the number
But isn’t it the “Latin Kings”???!! It sounds like he pronounces it “Laddin Kings”… I mean: if you’re trying to blame it on someone, you should probably get their name right… maybe I misheard or there’s a different gang that DOES sound like that, but… hmmm
oh Gawd! this winy defense lawyer voice is so annoying, boring! ridiculous, if I was a jury I would be rolling my eyes so many times I would need eye surgery after the trial!
Extortion? BS , it is similar story when Patrizia Gucci, asked one of best frien and confident to if she could find someone who could kill her husband Maurizio Gucci, well .... Her best confident friend found , the 3 killer/rs , thekilling was done to Maurizio Gucci on his way to work building entrance his wife paid the killers, as preaccorded, when the killers reveiled that the victim wife Patrizia Gucci was the master mind of her husband killing, She tried to get away and lied by saying she was insistntely extorted by her husband killers by saying the killers have tried to extort her a lot of money, but, fortunately they did not believe her , she was finally found guilty and ended up in jail , thank God justice was done for the poor Maurizio Gucci, Adelson lawyer is trying to make his client get away with the same story, exrtotion, no no no. premeditate murder this was, all people involved including some members of Wendy family should go to jail.
Defendant ask magbanua if she know someone that can hurt, stupid woman says she does, THOUGHTS OF EVILNESS STARTED HERE, THEN ACTUALLY DOING IT HAPPENED. magbanua should have just said no .
I don’t think there’s much chance of Wendi being arrested. She’s been given partial immunity to testify in all 3 trials and there has been virtually no testimony or evidence pointing to her as a conspirator in the murder. Donna, on the other hand, has been heavily implicated and will probably be arrested and charged if Charlie is convicted…in my opinion.
I watch court TV when it's live, but never ever when it is posted after the fact. Court TV changes and edits the testimonies of those talking during court. Just explaining why I don't watch vids like this one.
One question the defense forget to ask Louis Riviera about that how he knows about the kids custody and had no idea why he was going to Tallahassee with Sefredo Garcia LOl and if Garcia had an arranged plan before ahead why he did not told his partner in crime about the deal
The defense chose to assume the burden of proof when they revealed it was an extortion. The defense closing is poor. He says that Katie said it had to be a murder. Earlier the defense said Katie was frantic when she met charlie saying they went overboard and killed Dan. Too many conflicting stories. Katie was protecting Sigfredo. That's why she didn't take immunity. She regrets every choice she's made.
No she doesn’t! She’s selfish, cunning, and diabolical. A good human being would not even be involved in the planning of a murder. She sure fooled you! 🤯
@@elindemier again she’s selfish only reason she’s testifying against him is because she wants a lesser sentence now to be paroled one day that says a lot you don’t have to know her.
@@elindemier Most importantly if she truly had any remorse she would have admitted to her guilt from the very beginning. She was trying to get free until she was convicted. And now testifying against Charlie for her benefits. You need to use more critical thinking skills!
Reasonable dough should be banned without evidence because many innocent people have gone to prison on Reasonable dough later come to find out that it was all a lie and wrong by the prosecution... i think this guys follow the family
One of the worst defense strategies i have ever witnessed during my 45 years of watching/reading about trials. This attorney was so bad, he actually helped bury Charlie even deeper. He was slow, not interesting, not convincing. If he really thinks that Katie is a criminal mastermind who extorted the Adelson's, then this lawyer is an absolute idiot. But i think that he is a common liar.
Catch up on the FACTS here: www.courttv.com/tag/charlie-adelson/?
Does he understand that he is YELLING at the jury? That he is condescending.
He is not yelling, why are you saying that when we all can see he is not ??? He is passionate trying to convince the jury of his client’s innocence. Imagine listening to a story told by you … that’s why people should always take anything “with a grain of salt “
Reasonable doubt? Good luck!
How come his parents refuse to testify in favor of the accused IF the entire family was not directly involved?
Why would they testify if they had nothing to do with it?? It doesn't make sense
In case they implicate themselves 😮
@@rec.thecriticwell supposedly Wendi had nothing to do with it, but she testified. Bare minimum Donna is in those phone conversations and she could testify to "clear up" any "misunderstandings" in those. To speak on her sons behalf and try to help get him out of trouble, that'd be another good reason to testify. I think we all know why she wouldn't though. Shes next.
I don’t think it would have mattered who testified in Charlie’s defense in Tallahassee. I don’t think a Addelson can get a fair trial there. This case is going on 10 years, who in that town hasn’t heard about it or formed an opinion on their guilt.
@@markbaz that's because they're guilty 😆 the evidence says it all ?
“We’ll get to that” I think one of the worst things for an attorney to say.
That and “Let me back up a bit”
Less than 4 hours deliberation just shows you what a fantastic job the prosecution team did 👏 jobs not done yet 😮 donna someone's knocking at your door 😅
Yes indeed
@@cleew8762 ASAP
How did anyone know Dan Markel's address and his routine? If it didn't come from the Adelson's? Who had the most to gain from the murder? Who had the money for the hit?
Common sense.
Sit down defense.
The only thing that doesn't make sense is this attorney 😂
He better hope there’s a really tough gang of dentists in prison 😂
He'll just say...I can fix that for ya, anytime people throw fists around
They can put him to work being a dentist for the prisoners. For no pay of course. 😂😂
@@catherinewinkeler8587 that’s his only chance for some prison benefits he can be allowed to actually do dental care
@@catherinewinkeler8587no he will be too busy thinking how to win his appeal now.
Nope he can't practice dentistry anymore . His license is GONE .
This will allow the surviving Markels to fight for the custody of the kids.
Markels should have custody of the boys- once all Adelsons are behind bars
I agree. But by the time all of the Adelsons are in prison, the kids will not likely be minors
The extortion is about to happen as soon as he goes to prison.
Charlie was coughing up 300,000 to bribe DM to move to miami(a million $$$ altogether) so don’t act like Wendi and charley weren’t coconspirators
And his attorney said the bribe was legal😂
The problem, Mr Rashbaum, is that the puzzle pieces DID fit.
Ms Cappleman took all the little pieces and put them together, and they gave the true and complete picture of an entitled family who considered themselves above the law. They put their faith in money and privilege, and it failed them. The bumpkins of Tallahassee may not have much money or privilege, but what they did have was discernment and insight. They weren't hoodwinked by a fancy tale that had no logic. So who won? Not the Adelsons.
Guilty on all charges! Justice for Dan Markel 🙏🕯🙏🌹
Donna and Wendy r next!
Not sure how he could keep a straight face??
As we discussed in Jury selection, Charlie is innocent because .... as they say, family is everything.
A family who commits the crime together deserves to do the time together.
Wendi & Donna sent Charlie. Harvey knew all along. Charlie sent Katie. Katie sent Sigfredo. Like Dan, Sig was a father who fell for a diabolical woman but took Dan's life and is now doing life.
Now, Charlie faces life in prison.
The circle is almost full.
Wendi, Donna, and Harvey are next.
Wendi played dumb.
Unlike Dan's family, none of Charlie's family members showed up to support him because Donna & Harvey planned on pleading the 5th - HIS OWN FAWKING PARENTS, mind you... Wendi only showed up to testify to try to save her own arse because all four culprits are GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY.
I was SO relieved to find out the Jury got it right. They did a fabulous job.
Fry in HELL Charlie.
Can't WAIT for Donna's, Wendi's, and Harvey's indictment, although Harvey might get away with it.
The moral to this story-dont make phone calls when you are high on cocaine!...😅😅
When was this?
Why would someone extort him anyways if they didn't have dirt on him
That is the basic idea. And two different extortions. The weird thing is that everybody had the gut feeling that Donna's extortion was not a real one, that it was the cops looking into tripping them up. But they were not worried. They thought they were untouchable, and look where it has brought them...
My question would be why is he paying $1400 a month to Magbanua,?
That made no sense. Maybe if she had said from the beginning "I am so good in bed that he was paying to have me." it would have made some type of sense. People do that.
She made up stories. Then she had to admit that she lied. it was all a mess. It's not a good look if she has to admit that she has lied twice under oath.
He paid Katie to placate her in hopes she would side with him.
He paid katie for her orchestrating the hit..charlie didnt need Katie or anyone to 'protect' him!
My reasonable doubt is why is this guy free.
The problem with the defense theory is….the defense theory. It’s to complicated, convenient. It’s like that game “Jenga” where u have to stack pieces of wood on top of one another. The PROBLEM is that if even one of the pieces comes lose the whole story comes crashing down.
🤣
This lawyer was one big reason he lost! Should've called Jose Biaz. He'd be eating a steak right now.....
Totally AGREE . He should've hired Baez . This bozo played up to the cameras and tried to manipulate the jury.
Rashbaum wrecked his career today picking up a criminal trying to support him.
@tina
To lose anticipation and patience is to lose the battle
Stop rashbaum you are letting a murderer off the hook. Sigfredo was a lose cannon drugs and drink but he was not an extortionist did not even know how to ring the number
Charlie looks guilty but this closing argument is good
Guilty....
Im PUZZLED
Guilty
The defense attorney has to tone it down. He is constantly yelling. I feel so sorry for the people in that court room.
How long did he go on. He is the most boring talker and his voice is very bad too.
Who benefitted in this mess. Wendi, Charlie, keep looking over your shoulder along with your conniving parents. Three down, four to go!
Way too much reasonable doubt! Great attorney!
Well, he tried. He worked with what he had. He shouldn't have yelled so much in closing. It was 90 minutes of pure yelling.
Reasonable doubt? 🤣🤣🤣 best u put that Meth pipe down and sober up
@@tjjay2438 what a nasty person you are karen
@@LisaSimpsonRules LOL right. You know we are gonna see the mom and wendi next. At least for sure the mom.
🤣 lawyer playing up for the cameras . His client was found GUILTY in record time . A public defender couldve done the same
Honestly he did a good job in closing arguments, but he is guilty so it doesn’t matter. He looks like Michael Scott
At around 50 min. the judge is literally falling asleep
I have to say he's doing a good job
No he is doing a bad job, he doesn’t even know how to hypnotise his audience.
Rushbound is threatening the jurors and tells the jurors what to do. This is scary. He is not a good lawyer. This is not intelligent.
If you vote not guilty and send him home we will give freebies 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
He's HORRIBLE . He is trying to manipulate the jury and they see right through him. Forget about him playing up to the cameras
But isn’t it the “Latin Kings”???!! It sounds like he pronounces it “Laddin Kings”… I mean: if you’re trying to blame it on someone, you should probably get their name right… maybe I misheard or there’s a different gang that DOES sound like that, but… hmmm
Bye bye Charlie, enjoy your forever home and don't worry I'm sure there will be someone to check out your teeth.
Next !!!
This had me gripped. They def did it
oh Gawd! this winy defense lawyer voice is so annoying, boring! ridiculous, if I was a jury I would be rolling my eyes so many times I would need eye surgery after the trial!
I think the defense lawyer is a good lawyer; he tried. But he was against a strong case with lots of people evidence and a crazy contrived story.
What? Are you for real? He came up with “the hitman hired them self?” defense?! Yeah right.
He's Charlie's attorney right?? But y is he defending Wendy too???!!!! Smells fishy
These are not the droids you’re looking for.
Why is he so angry?
Sorry rashbaum you are supposed to be honest and right beside you have the biggest liar of all.
Extortion? BS , it is similar story when Patrizia Gucci, asked one of best frien and confident to if she could find someone who could kill her husband Maurizio Gucci, well .... Her best confident friend found , the 3 killer/rs , thekilling was done to Maurizio Gucci on his way to work building entrance his wife paid the killers, as preaccorded, when the killers reveiled that the victim wife Patrizia Gucci was the master mind of her husband killing, She tried to get away and lied by saying she was insistntely extorted by her husband killers by saying the killers have tried to extort her a lot of money, but, fortunately they did not believe her , she was finally found guilty and ended up in jail , thank God justice was done for the poor Maurizio Gucci, Adelson lawyer is trying to make his client get away with the same story, exrtotion, no no no. premeditate murder this was, all people involved including some members of Wendy family should go to jail.
Defendant ask magbanua if she know someone that can hurt, stupid woman says she does, THOUGHTS OF EVILNESS STARTED HERE, THEN ACTUALLY DOING IT HAPPENED. magbanua should have just said no .
Is he "rent a lawyer"? I've never seen such a horrible defense. 😅
The prosecution had all the puzzle pieces and they fit.
Wonder who will take care of Dan’s kids when Wendi and her mom get arrested? Because we all KNOW she and her mom were the masterminds behind this.
I don’t think there’s much chance of Wendi being arrested. She’s been given partial immunity to testify in all 3 trials and there has been virtually no testimony or evidence pointing to her as a conspirator in the murder. Donna, on the other hand, has been heavily implicated and will probably be arrested and charged if Charlie is convicted…in my opinion.
For sure
Dan's family!
The Markels
The children has another grandma in Canada that’s interested with the kids.
I watch court TV when it's live, but never ever when it is posted after the fact. Court TV changes and edits the testimonies of those talking during court. Just explaining why I don't watch vids like this one.
Why did he say he was in jail for a year and a half? That's crazy
Because he was.
wth happened to Larry Appleton ?
One question the defense forget to ask Louis Riviera about that how he knows about the kids custody and had no idea why he was going to Tallahassee with Sefredo Garcia LOl and if Garcia had an arranged plan before ahead why he did not told his partner in crime about the deal
Reasonable doubt.
Considering the evidence, im finding this to be a weak closing.
The defense chose to assume the burden of proof when they revealed it was an extortion. The defense closing is poor. He says that Katie said it had to be a murder. Earlier the defense said Katie was frantic when she met charlie saying they went overboard and killed Dan. Too many conflicting stories. Katie was protecting Sigfredo. That's why she didn't take immunity. She regrets every choice she's made.
No she doesn’t! She’s selfish, cunning, and diabolical. A good human being would not even be involved in the planning of a murder. She sure fooled you! 🤯
@@HopefulInterventions I’m sure you know how she feels about her mistakes.
@@elindemier again she’s selfish only reason she’s testifying against him is because she wants a lesser sentence now to be paroled
one day that says a lot you don’t have to know her.
@@elindemier Most importantly if she truly had any remorse she would have admitted to her guilt from the very beginning. She was trying to get free until she was convicted. And now testifying against Charlie for her benefits. You need to use more critical thinking skills!
Judge falling asleep,I wonder if jury falling asleep too, can you blame them?
Was the reading of the verdict not televised? Would have loved to have seen charley’s face
It’s available!
@@charrielyn1231 thx, I think I found it 10 minutes after asking the question, then couldnt find my question to delete it, double bad on me😉
Reasonable dough should be banned without evidence because many innocent people have gone to prison on Reasonable dough later come to find out that it was all a lie and wrong by the prosecution... i think this guys follow the family
Reasonable doubt is what may save a defendant. If the prosecution cannot prove for sure.
@@LisaSimpsonRulesExactly!
One of the worst defense strategies i have ever witnessed during my 45 years of watching/reading about trials. This attorney was so bad, he actually helped bury Charlie even deeper. He was slow, not interesting, not convincing. If he really thinks that Katie is a criminal mastermind who extorted the Adelson's, then this lawyer is an absolute idiot. But i think that he is a common liar.