only just today heard about these non rotating EBCT machines. never seen one in practice. Our Siemens force does a great job of CTCA and much more, I imagine these EBCT machines are now obsolete.
You’re right the engineering improvements on third gen CT have been impressive and put EBCT out of business. The modern tubes can deliver a lot more x-ray flux than EBCT and 3rd generation CT is also versatile for all anatomy.
Yes, and is not actively manufactured any longer. The basic 3rd generation has continued to get faster along with more coverage and dual source configurations so this configuration is less attractive now.
Your illustration is great 👍 I faced difficulty in understanding the difference between the ct generations but you made it easy so thanks alot.
Thanks Eman, glad they helped. ;)
Great job and great heart. Thanks much.
Thanks
your content is very useful, keep it up
Thanks Letoya, I appreciate your feedback. Feel free to drop suggestions.
thank you so much! this helped me a lot
You’re welcome Anton, glad to help
only just today heard about these non rotating EBCT machines. never seen one in practice. Our Siemens force does a great job of CTCA and much more, I imagine these EBCT machines are now obsolete.
You’re right the engineering improvements on third gen CT have been impressive and put EBCT out of business. The modern tubes can deliver a lot more x-ray flux than EBCT and 3rd generation CT is also versatile for all anatomy.
Well explained
Thanks for the comment 😊
Itz help me a lot sir ✌🏻🌝
You’re welcome
This is only for cardiac scanning?
Yes, and is not actively manufactured any longer. The basic 3rd generation has continued to get faster along with more coverage and dual source configurations so this configuration is less attractive now.
@@HowRadiologyWorks thanks ❤️
Which generation uses cone beam geometry?
We have another video on cone-beam as well, it is built on traditional 3rd generation geometry with source and detector opposed
Poor 5th generation CT 😢