What if the Nazis won World War 2?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 7 вер 2024
- This is yet another reboot, hope you guys like it. This video has absolutely no relation to Martin Luther King's day, just bad timing.
The link to the Knowing Better video • Out of Context: How to...
Nerdy nitpicks I will have to make.
1.Stalin's purge of the officry was 1937-1939, not just 1939.
2.Vichy France is given the whole of France after the war. This is so that the Germans don't have to hold down the populated areas of the north of France and so they can instead use them for the subjugation of the French colonies. The fear of a British Invasion would also diminish over time.
3.Israel would probably not exist due to the rampant Anti-Semitism that would exist in this world. Also, the world would never really know the true horror of the Holocaust until Nazi Germany would collapse-whenever that would be.
4.I'm not sure if Pakistan would be a Nazi or American ally.
5.Brazil, although a dictatorship, was American aligned during World War 2.
Finally someone realizes that winning WW 2 and conquering the world are two different tasks.
*Not in hoi4 lol*
@@MyUsersDark except for when it takes 2 years to move through canada :(
@@ihatemotionblur_3255 That still applies to my thing tho
Its like vietnam, they won but as far as I know they aren't a super power
@@FelipeJaquez No one won Vietnam. If you think Vietnam won you should really look into that history a lot better.
FDR, 1943: All of Europe has fallen, but don't worry we got Iwo Jima
Is this a bokoen1 reference
Lol I’ve seen that. It’s really funny
@@impitsar2332 exactly
@@teethpuller8247 I knew it
IWO JIIIIIIMAAAA
Can you make a video on "What if my dad never left?"
You would still be getting beat
It’ll be okay.
Hahaha my dog your killing it 😆😂👏👍
tell your mom to be communist and believe me comrad your dad will come back
What if Karen let me keep the kids?
Finally someone who didn’t remind everyone every 2 minutes “it is impossible for Germany to win WW2” so people won’t get mad at them
Was it actually impossible for Germany to win WW2 or was Hitler just incompetent?
Like if he had just held the line against the Communists in non Russian soil and just bombed the absolute shit out of the entire British isles he wouldn't even have to ight America right?
France was already in his pocket and Italy was still on his side at that point.
I mean dday was a miracle, if that didn't happen who knows?
@@tivvy2vs21 soviets would still win....
@@johnmachenzie1613 maybe, don't know as much on that front
I think it's possible for Germany to defeat the Soviet Union, but "winning the war?" Nah. More likely there would be a cold war between the Axis powers and the remaining allies.
literally right when he was talking about how Hitler would have tried to kill all the Slavic people the video stopped, and I got an ad for "why I should date young Slavic women"
the timing
@@morganjalso473 top ten most bruh moments in history.
I’m gonna guess you’re not german because that would just be too much
that happens to me when i watch his videos about china
That's not true
I'm not surprised Hitler had a concept of "Noble Savages" since he read western novels written by Karl May that depicted Native Americans in a positive light when he was a kid.
He did, actually. He abbreviated that term to the Turks
Hitler the Rousseauist
@@bosphiii really
@Louis van der Merwe he read*
@@chompchompmaster2885 YES 🔴🖍️⚒️👠SO🆘RED 💯😻⚒️😸😹
"Hitler and the Radicals" would probably be a good punk rock band name
Green Day will be a flop if that band Exist
I'd listen to it.
hahahahahahaha
Sabaton, but punk
Modern "punk rock" is oddly safe and politically correct. It's not "punk" or "rebellious" at all. They picked a side and they stick to it for the most part like a bunch of conformists.
World War II was so crazy it's almost hard to believe it actually even happened like really the whole story of old war almost seems like a really crazy Fairy Tail
The trojan war was so long ago that it is passed down as a legend, maybe in the future this wars will do to.
You can already see after 75 years that the lines between the good guys and the bad guys had blurred and will blur even more as all the veterans will die of old age, but mostly because the US has lost it's title of Paragon of Democracy.
The next 20 years will be a very interesting period to live in.
that applies to all of history. One of the most defining battles in British history (which would lead to them conquering all of India) was the battle of plassey. They were outnumbered 1000 to 1, and won because of a smart commander and a mangrove
@@leeroy4958 hopefully there aren't any wars between India and China or USA and China
hopefully you survive world war 3
Really? We're still living in a geopolitical paradigm which was largely shaped by the Cold War and Second World War. With a coalition of liberal democracies on one side and (former) communist countries as their adversaries. We're not talking about the War of the Roses here.
'Russia is impossible to invade'
Mongols:hold my beer
russia didnt exist at the time it was just smaller independent slavic states kinda like germany in the 1800s
Lang Hansen the mongols never even conquered siberia
Lang Hansen and the people were not russians, they were called slavs
Lang Hansen when the mongol empire split up the north west became the slavic countries so i guess you were kind of right
Poland took Moscow once and conquered Russia
What a good HOI4 mod
Kaiserreich is still better.
Antike Check out the TNO mod. Its still in The Works but its gonna better Than kaisereich, trust me.
Fatherland
TNO gang
fatherland mod, the guy making it is still working on it tho
But would Stalin invent the typewriter?
But would Tetris exist?
Stalin invented the airplane
Sup putin
Katiușa
*_It's the king of the world_*
The reason it’s so heated is WW2 created the mythology that is destroying the world.
Bingo
What?
@@StarboyXL9what does he mean?
Is the noticing really upon us?
@@anntakamaki1960 liberalization of mankind
One small problem. All borders and scenarios around Finland were off. Finns fought alongside germany in barbarossa and we stopped voluntarily our attack on lake onega. With german succes, finns would take all karelia up the white sea and maybe kola peninsula, if germany wouldn't take it.
It's my understanding that the Finns only took from the Russians what the Russians took from them during the 'Winter War'. No more, no less.
michael wier You are actually wrong. Even since we got out independence we wanted to have the whole of east karelia, so we occupied it during continuation war.
First about it was about Finland regaining lands lost after the Winter War but after that their goal was to create a greater finland
@Metsarebuff 22 That's not true. He was a member of The National Progressive Party, and friend of K.J Ståhlberg, who was kidnapped by the fascists. On the other hand, in this scenario one might think that Ryti would be the most qualified man to lead these areas, but Estonia and Ingria would certainly have been taken over by the Germans.
@Metsarebuff 22 Considering that Finland would be under the German influence, they would let Finland keep eastern Karelia. The same would probably happen in Hungary, Italy etc.
Funny: "the Russians wouldn't stand a Genocidal Maniac to rule", but they had Stalin which was the biggest genocidal maniac after Mao
They survive from the best genocidal dictactor No wonder they are paranaoid as fck hahah
@Metsarebuff 22 No, just around 1.7 million deaths in the Gulag, some 390,000 deaths during kulak forced resettlement and up to 400,000 deaths of persons deported to Forced settlements - with a total of about 3.3 million officially recorded victims. The deaths of at least 5.5 to 6.5 million persons in the famine of 1932-33.
@@cutalin You are missing about 3 million dead Tschetschens who Stalin despised for some reason.
The winner's write history. The Allies knew of the genocide the Soviets had commited at the time but they didn't give a damn, their focus was to end Nazi Germany but then the cold war happened and I don't think talking shit about Stalin would have been good.
He only killed 2.5% of the whole population.
1939:
- I just went forward in time to see all the possible outcomes
- how many there are?
- 15 million
- In how many does Germany win ww2?
- One
good thing this universe didn't be that one
why
@@Pikasatupu75 Germany couldn't have one. Or atleast their chances were so small as to be completley negligible.
As an offensive, I find this bass player Not really, in any reasonable world, when all of britains continental allies surrendered and the population wanted peace, there should have been a peace. Literally the only reason britain did not make peace with Germany was #1 becouse Churchhill hid all the german peace offers from basically everyone in the UK #2 Churchhill was personally invested and was not acting reasonably at that moment. Britain had no capabilities to actually win the war at that point, their main goal of defending Poland had failed long ago and their main continental european ally (france) had just been crushed. If churchill is slightly reasonable or if anyone else gets elected Britain makes peace with Germany, which means no lend-lease etc to the USSR and the entire wehrmacht focuses on the USSR = the soviet economy collapses during 1941 (which it narrowly avoided due to western aid)
@@hkl1459 I mean France and Britain in 1939 did have better army than Germany... It's just the bad governing in both nations
Hitler’s plan was never to beat Great Britain, he only wanted them to surrender, so he could focus his power on the Soviet Union. The only reason who couldn’t was because Great Britain refused to surrender, was being supplied by the United States, which means either scenario, Germany vs the U.S. would most likely be a thing, unless the United States stayed out completely and elected certain political figures that were Nazi sympathizers. Two, Great Britain had total control over the English Channel and this would mean that an invasion of Great Britain by the Germans would be practically
Impossible because not only did Great Britain have the best navy in the area, but the German navy was most definitely not up to par.
Isn’t your enemy surrendering still defeating them?
Interesting that international capitalism came to the rescue for communism. Really makes you wonder...
@@Bigguy5154 I wonder why bankers and media spend so much time and resources making sure everybody is misinformed on WW2 and Fascism, upon inspecting fascist literature for myself it appears to be nothing like the media or academia says.
It's almost like the victors and rulers of the modern world would not survive in such an anti-oligarchy and anti-freemason system. Makes you think.
The *Italians* had a much better surface navy than the Germans.
@@deriznohappehquite maybe the did. I was always taught that the Britains had the best, but either way, I don’t believe it would make a difference considering Hitler hated the Italians too and thought of himself and the Aryans as superior. The Italians and Mussolini new this and despised him for it. They may have been temporary Allies, but I don’t think the Italian Navy would have moved to the English Channels under Hitler’s orders, simply because they didn’t like him.
Or Brirain accepts Hitlers 1940 peace offer and allows germany to focus on USSR alone. But Churchill must not be prime minister in order for this to work
I'm glad you brought that up it's what I was thinking
Brirain never got an offer because brirain isn’t a country. Do you mean Britain?
Also Britain won’t accept because of Hitler invaded the rest of Czecho-Slovakia Munich conference rule that Hitler would only have Sudetenland
@@AdiPearStudios sorry never noticed that spelling mistake, thank you for pointing it out.
@Metsarebuff 22 British didn't really care about Poland, they were just looking for a reason to go to war with Germany, there was no way to stop them because top officials wanted another war.
What IF Julius Caesar Survived being assassinated?
He invaded Parthia and Annexes Mesopotamia. The Romans don’t have the logistics to conquer more. He might set out client states and Caesar would be very old. His health would have started to fail. He would groom Octavian into his heir and the empire might develop over time peacefully into a centralized empire. Of course Antony might stir up trouble and Augustus would probably assassinate Caesarian just to be sure. He might use Caesarion as propaganda in the Senate as a foreign king looking to carve Rome into his own kingdom and subject it to its “could Nilotic rites” (from HBO show Rome). Augustus would beat him with his badass buddy Agrippa and annex Egypt. If a Trajan comes along in the future he might invade Persia and take more land, or take all of Germany. Germanicus was very close zero doing so.
Justin Pachi Caesarion would probably be used to justify Rome’s legitimacy over Egypt, but I agree, Ceasarion would be a huge threat to Octavian’s legitimacy, and Caesarion would be no joke due to being raised by two of the smartest leaders in history. On the other hand Rome had very little interest in conquering Germany, as it had no recourses that would benefit them. If Rome were to conquer Germany, it would be very underdeveloped and unguarded, more so the Britannia, and would be subjected to raids from Slavic and Scandinavian groups or guerrilla warfare by native Germans. Persia would also be very hard to control, due to its mountainous terrain and the fact that Persians already had a deep history and culture.
I think ironically the republic might survive. Caesar was ambitious and would probably rule until death as dictator but remember in Rome a dictator was expected to relinquish power back to the senate. I don't think he'd groom an heir, at least not one to rule as dictator/emperor. He would implement massive changes to curb the power of the oligarchs making the senate more plebian in nature. But not entirely so, he did believe that they deserved to be helped but that the distinguished should still be in charge, so while I don't see a monarchy arising there would be authoritarianism. Ultimately this would be good for the health of the republic which was corrupt as hell by the end.
As for conquests, if any, he'd take Mesopotamia from Parthia to avenge his colleague Crassus. Knowing his boundless opportunism he would probably set up some client states too in the Caucasus and maybe Arabia while in the region. Small bits of Germany may be taken, especially if a disaster like the one under Augustus happened and he felt his and the honor of Rome itself was diminished. After him Persia beckons as the final frontier of Rome, well Rome proper anyway colonial ambitions may arise in time. all of Arabia would probably be taken in time and from there Rome would slowly expand in all directions at a leisurely pace while its core lands are safe.
Probably Dacia would have been invaded much earlier, since Caesar had plans to conquer it (king Burebista of the dacians supported Pompeii in the Roman civil war, and thus Ceasar wanted to give them a lesson).
yes good topic OK!
Laughed at : Martial Asshole Aristocrat Class
One thing missing, what becomes of Italy and Mussolini in this alternate universe?
Mussolini takes over Germany after they balkanize and fall into civil war
Lmao
There’s -an interesting one, I can’t remember if it’s MonsieurZ or AltHistoryHub, where fascist Europe has a revival of the Protestant Wars, with the Catholics on one side and the Nordic and Slavic nations on the other. When you have Spain, Italy, and France on one side, you’re pretty much SOL. The entire War of Spanish Succession was about preventing an alliance like this to exist in the first place.
He is still hitlers bitch
Better than being a bunch of pathetic last men who just want to be comfortable.
“my opinion doesn’t matter because I’m a minor you tuber” damn that’s cold
🤬
he also said in another video "i have a youtube channel so my opinion is demonstrably better than yours" so now I don't know what to believe
@Kāne viewer < small youtuber < big youtuber < The UA-cam Overlord Susan < Google
@@genalynnesanjuan5788 < me BWAHAHAHAH
3:32
Wait, is this true? Are there any credible sources that say this? During all my WW2 research I've *ALWAYS* heard that the German's needed to take the Caucasus oil from the Soviets because they didn't have enough oil to field massive amounts of motorized infantry and they would need it to field more aircraft and tanks on the eastern front. Still, I wouldn't call this bad stragery on Hitler's part, if he could still at least cut the Soviet's off of their oil he would still benefit.
bump
Austin Bosh bad thing was he ordered them to invade early....leaving the 6th
army alone to take Stalingrad
Yes, and cutting the Red Army off from their main fuel supply would have been a lot easier than trying to capture the oil fields intact (the Red Army would have sabotaged them if they had to retreat).
No, it is not.
"Synthetic oil" covered only 50% of army needs, army itself was consuming half of all oil in occupied Europe.
Make the math.
Already by december of 1941 (one year before Stalingrad), Opel had to stop its production of "blitz" army trucks as it didnt have enough fas to even test fuel pumps.
Author is wrong on this topic and severely underestimates HOW MUCH fossil fuels matter in military-industrial complex.
@@prashantaryan3477 The Germans sent their army into the region earlier than planned because the Red Army was disorganized and unprepared at the time, and didn't want to give them room to regroup (they were expecting a push towards Moscow, so the southern front was underdefended). It was either methodically advance and let the Soviets regroup and possibly reinforce the lines, or push the pedal to the metal and push them as far as they could. They chose the latter since they realized they needed a decisive victory- every year the war dragged on the Soviet's industrial capacity would outpace the Germans and they could afford to send more and more equipment and men to the front lines. The Germans knew a war of attrition was suicide and that's why they constantly hoped for a quick death blow like in the Ardennes. Unfortunately for them, it never came.
This has been the most realistic "what if WWII" Timeline I've seen so far, you've talked about gains from spoils of war, the effects on both the USSR and the US, and how the US would act with Germany since the Dutchland isn't the Union and had compatible qualities. How British would fare in a post world war landscape, and how it would lose some and gain some. It's sad to hear how Original France would fade into obscurity while the Jews would face total eradication. The most unique thing is how the descendents would inevitably change the ideologies of Germany from a obsessive one into a somewhat progressive one where they have a softer leniency towards their serfs unlike their forbearers who wanted nothing but subjugation and eradication. Good work 👍
There is no mention of how the Germans deported Jews to Palestine. Eichman as even honored by the Jews for providing funds to Jewish industries in Palestine. The British opposed the Jewish immigrations, and even sunk a couple of German ships carrying migrants before WW2.
There's no mention of how the US lend lease policy might change nor how Roosevelt was seeking any way to get involved in the European Theatre. I have to believe that if Hitler didn't declare war on the US days after Pearl Harbor then Roosevelt would've set up a false flag.
I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I do know that Roosevelt was bending any rule he could to get the US more involved in the European War. I've just discovered this youtuber and I hope this is the last video of his I watch. He seems to ignore certain things at his will (mentioning Nuclear Weapons used by the US, Germany, and the USSR then dropping it?!) because it becomes too hard.
I"m not saying I could do better but I am not putting out multiple videos myself
@@jmw1500When someone doesn’t understand something they claim it’s the jews, so pathetic. Progressivism actually just comes with wealth and comfort on a large scale, as is seen in every nation upon approaching high income.
Some Jews would survive, mainly those in America.
If your a christian you need to repent of your sins PLZ
The only reason Vietnam went communist in our timeline was to ally itself with the USSR and PRC in their fight for independence. With the former crippled and the latter not existing, there's no reason why Vietnam would be communist. If anything they would turn to the nazis for support.
The Japanese would have conquered most of Asia so the Vietnamese would be to busy fighting or joining the Japanese to be worrying about communism or Nazi's.
@@benelmen6051 The communist threat in Indochina actually predated the Japanese takeover. Too many people refuse to recognize that the Viet Quoc fought for independence from France when Ho Chi Minh was still in the French Communist Party, and that the Viet Minh waged war against them before Tokyo took control.
It’s because our presidents changed and the people in the nation didn’t want war. Once the troops pulled out, 2 years later the opposition won and communism took over.
@@ilikepiedontu True, but the consequences of giving up turned out to be more severe that we imagined. America was right about Vietnam all along, even if the communist takeover didn't go according to the Domino Theory.
The MAIN and MOST IMPORTANT reason why Vietnam turned to the USSR was because the USA basically SOLD OUT the Vietnamese. Instead of sticking to it's own ideals, the US Government choose to forget what it is supposed to stand for and go for the short-term solution. And the Vietminh, which had been a ally of the US during WW2 and it's fight against the Japanese was sold out by the US. After WW2 France simply wanted Vietnam back as their colony and the US, wanting France as an ally in Europe, started helping the French, even supplying transport ships for French troops to get to 'French Indo-China'. So, the VietMin, which really wanted national independence, started a war against the French occupiers with help from China the USSR whereas France was supported by the USA.
The French were defeated and left as soon as they understood they could not win. This, of course, was just after the Korean War stalemate which had the US solidly locked into the Cold War and saw no other option than support their puppet 'democratíc' South Vietnamese ally. With led to the long protracted war which the US government insiders new they could not win and but still, persisted in far longer than they should have.
"Russian move their capital to Kazan": in fact the actual contingency plan was to move the capital to the city of Kuybyshev (cooy-bee-shef), currently named Samara. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalin%27s_bunker
should've moved to kara khorum
@Jotaro97 Historical studies usually refer to settlements by their names at the time of the events described, trying to avoid discussion of which name is "correct". E.g. "Kaliningrad was the capital of East Prussia" and "Koenigsberg is the westernmost large city of the Russian Federation" would be equally bad descriptions :)
@@ivankrivyakov5250 yeah pretty much like Istanbul which really only mean to the city
in Turkish the name really becoming a issue in the 1920's when Turkey was Nationalizing itself the city having a lot of different name depending to cultural view greek still calling it Constantinople and some turc calling it Kostantiniyye
Iews wouldn't be replacing us in our homelands with foreign invaders.
True, brother.
Trve
🙄
we'd be living much happier lives
Remember, it's not all fun and games, Without the Jews there no Jesus and no Moses since they were both Jewish, meaning Islam would be nothing like in our own timeline, also, remember, what the jews are doing now is child's play to what the Germans would do to them in this timeline
The explanation was rather over complicated, it would have been a lot faster if you just said the clear and obvious fact that the Germans could have easily won if the used 40 width tank divisions instead of the 20 widths they were using.
source?
@@KyleOber It's a HOI4 related joke if I'm not mistaken, no need to take it seriously
🤣
Or go all in on researching synthetic oil, submarines, CAS, and naval bombers in the 30s and then wait til 1941 unleash them on the Allies - Stalin will always go for Poland with historical AI in 1940.
Until the next patch!
Germany:ah This is hard... Ja...ja pan
Japan:what
Germany: i need help man
Japan:ok *atacks pearl harbor*
Germany: X_X
Japan:hi? ... germany?
WW2 in a nutshell
Uk: * happy British noises *
@@helpiamstuckonthismanshead3385 happy slurping tea noises actually
Well technically the germans urged the Japanese to attack the soviets
Witch resulted in the Japanese having flashbacks of various japanese defeats
And the second time to attack america
I can honestly say that I am proud the allies won on the atlantic front against the Axis powers... the sad fact of the matter is they only won because of Germany's mistakes.
Germany's failures actually began 1 year prior to the battle of Normandy.
The failure was initiated through lack of quality management and foresight by the German Field Marshals.
In regards to the Atlantic coast of Europe.
Had the management been better, Adolf's Field Marshals would've been sufficiently prepared for a Coastal invasion regardless of it being at Normandy or elsewhere.
I learned this while studying the Book of Five Rings by Miyamoto Musashi during my studies of World War 2 history.
Allies strength lies in certain things that needed to be countered and they weren't because of Field Marshal lack of planning and resource management.
They ALSO got the help of Japan TOO LATE. That is a pacific issue that also contributed to the problem.
All of these mistakes made by Germany are what contributed to creating hope for you and I, the Allies.
It's extremely humbling to think we only won because of an enemy's blatantly obvious and pathetic mistakes... I'm glad we won... it's just... not as pride instilling knowing exactly WHY we won. That's all.
"The Nazis were just so evil" or maybe history is just written by the winners and if the Nazis won, we would have been saying "the allies were just so evil", because after all, America, Britain and USSR did many terrible things, but it's okay when they do it because they won
The Nazis killed 12 million innocent people 6 million of them being Jews. Making a dumb claim just for the sake of being different shows your low intelligence.
@Block Master that number you state is dubious at best and even if true pretty sure the allies killed more....
@@blockmaster156 No no 50 million jews were killed in the holocaust and if you say it was even one less than that you're an anti-semitic neo nazi grrrrr!!!!!
True. The early concentration camps were reported by the Soviets as well. It wouldn’t surprise me if Stalin had ordered killings and then blamed it on the Nazis. He depended on western aid
About the Jews in this Scenario , I think the "Madagaskar-Plan " = shipping all Jew to French-Madagaskar-Colonie could also be possible, without the Naval
Threat of GB and USA.
Send em to space
Except they couldn't because they were at war, by the time Germany would have won the war, the ifnal solution was already in effect, so why bother digging up their old madagaskar plan when they had already constructed the camps?
Why do people act like madagascar had no native population? I doubt they'd be ok with jews being forced onto them also Madagascar was a french only and as history showed germany got its ass kicked trying to go near it.
@@armzngunz Because they intended the camps to be manufactoring plants? Because the deal that was struck (The Haavara Agreement) had the Jews keeping their possessions and wealth at the cost of working in the camps until the end of the war, when they would they would get a ship to Madagascar.
@@Reznor1974 No, people were being killed inside and outside the camps before "bombings of supply lines", there were always horrible conditions.
Sources for the red cross please?
The allies aren't responsible for taking in refugees illegaly deported from Germany, nor did the allies forcefully deport jews to Palestine.
What about the natives of Madagascar? How would millions of jews survive in a hostile jungle?
"The Russians would not stand to have genocidal maniacs in control of much of their homeland" They did in our timeline, for decades.
@@Osgfkqgvsu Stalin was Georgian, and Khruschev was Ukrainian.
@@Hitman-889 Well those 2 countries were part of the Russian Empire & only gained independence 30 years ago
yeah the tsar, who was rightfully killed
@@giorgiocecchini9742 -Youre being sarcastic?..Or a POS?..Yeah...murdering children is SO righteous.
Yeah, I mean there was a genocidal famine that doesn't seem to get a whole lot of press...
Australia exists and soes much of the fighting against the japanese for most of 1941 and 1942
Whatifalthist: Americans fight the Japanese alone
Yeh iv noticed a patriotic approach when he makes these vids which is allowed but to the point of deafening out any outside help makes him sound narrow minded.
The Australians really didn’t so much in an overall scale. Besides Indonesia and Australia, they barely faught in the Pacific.
@@Tsunami0950 until early 1943 95% of all troops in the south pacific were Australians.
@@MP-no8yy And what did they accomplish? On the grand scheme? Nothing.
@@Tsunami0950 the first Japanese defeat at Milne Bay and pushing the Japanese back all before the Americans even got into the fight
0:46 says the comment section will be horrible
Me: immediately scrolls to comments
Same man, same
In this alternate timeline, would Anne Frank still invent the ball point pen?
Yes, but nobody would ever know. lol
@@finallimoride4621, good answer.
NO BECAUSE THERE IN ZE ATTIC
@@angryalaskin2479, they can come out now.
The typhus is gone.
Frankly no she wouldn't, living in a loft she would invent the dust buster instead
Well I would not be here because I'm Slavic.
np 1993 same, im jewish
np 1993 You probably would exist, because your family might've been one of the many families who migrated to the new Russian heartland, the stans.
Maybe, if your family moved to your new heartland (central asia), if not then yeah, you're dead
Keen Rays probably not, the African Americans residing in Germany during the time had to be forcibly sterilized. I wouldn’t be here either tho, I’m a Slavic Russian.
@Keen Rays germany won't be able to invade america anyways, sooooo....
Why must he talk like the Burger King Foot Lettuce Guy?
He does the same little down turn in his voice at the end of every sentence..ah
Because they are the same.
I’m thinking more big gay al... lol. Still greatly put together.
Dalton Miller oh Mary don't ask
Why must you whine?
Thanks UA-cam, for recommending this to me on New Year's eve in Germany.
You're not allowed to talk about hitler in Germany
Cuz law n stuff
@@imcloud305 You sure?
@@MyUsersDark yes
If you held the nazi falg then you would mostly likely to be behind the bars
@@imcloud305 theres unironic nazis in germany bro wdym
@@thescarecrow897 they gotta do it in disguise just like the kkk in usa
This would make one hell of a movie.
Think a series would be better
It would be a horror movie.
@@gorgon6680 It certainly would.
@@craftmania_0 Fascism would`ve meant the end for black people.
@@craftmania_0 ua-cam.com/video/KBlpcHOR0XE/v-deo.html
10:33 "the Russians would not stand to have genocidal maniacs in control of much of their homeland"
Should be a correction there.
The Russians would not stand to have foreign* genocidal maniacs, local ones are fine (cough) Stalin (cough)
Also, love how you pronounced "Archangel" as Arch-Angle lol
Arch Angel, Ark- angel, both are technically wrong. The "correct" way is the ugliest sounding name ever, 'ar - khan- guels'.....
Stalin didn't commit genocide
Well not genocide your correct but he did have mass killings of people that were rebellious
@@oskarnymand389 (cough) holodomar (cough)
Stalin is Georgian, although at the time of his birth Georgia was apart of the Russian empire.
7:17 anyone else notice a clown face in the bomb cloud?
(I'm aware this may be intentional, just curious if anyone else saw it)
@@calypsohandjack9278 ah thanks for the info :)
Gotcha. But I don't think it's intentional..
Human minds just work that way to want to see faces in everything.
I saw IT
I see a very angry man looking downwards.
There'd no marxists or pride flags 😂
Thinks Aryan "Nazis" couldn't make allies because of racism.
They had allies, non-Aryan allies, you acknowledged they had allies, and thought others may flip to their side.
Get your thinking straight!
No Islamic terrorism since we would let them have their own countries and not murder their children for Israel.
The Germans only allied non-aryans like the Japanese, because they had the same enemies. They didn't realy cooperate or anything, and it's unlikly that they would have had much allies like America had during the Cold War.
@@counc Indeed, but they only allowed them in the war because they were realy needed.
@@stafverstegen2408 On winning the war the nazis would have then turned on those non aryan allies. Remember the night of the long knives
@@christiandauz3742 It horrified SOME nazi's, such as Von Falkenhausen, but others, like Hitler, barely cared.
What if Sigismund III was able to keep control of Sweden and later form the Polish-Lithuanian-Swedish-Commonwealth?
YE PLEASE
In Hitler's mind:
"Polish people are not aryan like us germans, but the iranians are!"
What a hell was wrong with this man? This don't make any sense. Even the white nationalists who follow Hitler would say this is absurd, ironically
Well clearly you don’t know what “history” is and the movement of people around the world. Mainly the indo Europeans. Which the Germanic tribes are inside of. And surprisingly, the Nazis where smart enough to see the genetic similarities between them.
@@rbvfeehfbudenrjAre Polish people more genetically distant from Germans than Persians are?
You clearly don't understand biology at all.
And at that time there was no genetic science.
Iranians were the real aryans.
Just as I always say:
"Professor, what lessons do we learn from History?"
"Well Virginia, we only learn two things from History:
1. We never learn from History
2. Don't march on Moscow with Winter coming."
easily one of the most interesting perspectives I've seen on this topic, accounts for a lot of things most other channels seem afraid to go either for contemporary reasons or for sparking outrage by nazi lovers/armchair generals/soviet lovers among others
holy shit I couldn't stop myself from laughing at the end "nazi Germany would become a feudal slave Society"
yes, because my historical narrative comes from movies and comic books and I have no idea how corporatism works.
@@benitomussolini3108 hey, at least I don't have to use poison gas and tanks to win aginst a country that's smaller than mine
+Teddy Roosevelt the Arditi would crush the Rough Riders
U N D E R W A T E R C A M A N D O S
@@benitomussolini3108 if only the the entire Italian army was so good
+Teddy Roosevelt at least I don't take fake photo ops to LARP as some kind of rugged mountain man when in reality your family was pretty well-off financially
The U.S. had “the bomb” first so the Big H was not going to frack with Uncle Sam.
Superb presentation and thought process of the entire process.
The US had the bomb first because of multiple captured Nazi scientists. If Britain was out and the US and Germany didn't go to war against each other, those same scientists would have given Germany nukes first.
Germany likely would as well. The US created that program via a spy network into Germany. The real reality is this, Germany would have had the bomb years before anyone else in this scenario. They planned to target large population centers to bring a country to surrender on Nazi terms (sound familiar).
Well…..we wouldn’t have any homeless, asylums, or drug addicts
10:30 "The russians would not stand to have genocidal maniacs in control of much of their homeland"
*LAUGHS IN HOLODOMOR*
@Metsarebuff 22 laughs in*
*Also laughs in Katyn forest*
Holodomor wasn't intentional, you think Stalin controls the rain and the food? No, he doesn't
@@Contrarian-C okay, Putin
Metsarebuff 22 laughs in bullshit
Do What If Sweden and The Netherlands kept their New World Colonies
New York City would be New Amsterdam
Yes but would Britain take the rest of America or just Sweden and the Dutch, and if they did took it, would The United States still exist or be as powerful?
Yeah and add up smaller colony states, like Polish Courland, Denmark, Habsburg Empire and others
The Dutch done fucked up by not moving a bit more south and securing Australia.
This from an Australian.
@@stooge_mobile We are smart enough, to not settle a big ass island with animals and plants ready to kill a man. Sincerely a Nederlander (Dutchman)
1:40 “he couldn’t defeat Britain or Russia”
actually, he could’ve defeated Britain or Russia, he just couldn’t at the same time. If he kept attacking Britain and didn’t attack Russia, Britain would’ve fallen. He also came decently close to defeating Russia, and he may have defeated them if he didn’t have to continue to fight Britain
He just couldn’t defeat Britain AND Russia
Alex Trainor He couldn’t defeat Britain before the invasion of the USSR.
@@grahamturner2640 the ussr was planning to invade of london fell. But britian isnt invaded.
Depents if ioseph thinks its because there weak or strong.
He might think there incapable and keep building up to his invasion he planned for like early 50s
this is only true if you assume there’s trade coming in from either side, but if britain puts an embargo on germany while germany declares war on russia they would’ve never won the war due to severe oil shortages. And i’m curious on how you think germany could’ve possibly won against britain
Air born invasion by masive air superiorty
Thou that requires a visonairy in air warfare.
This wouldn't work. Even if the Germans won the battle of Britain and gained air superiority the British navy would be so strong an invasion would be impossible. The only reason the Germans invaded the Soviets was because they needed the oil from the caucuses since Britain was naval blockading them. Even if they went on a middle east campaign the Soviets would invade Germany in winter 1942. Stalin had no intention of following his alliance with Germany. The war would most likely end in 1944 if the Germans didn't invade the Soviets.
I disagree about one thing. I think this would speed up American civil rights. During our timeline’s Cold War the USA did everything it could culturally to appose the soviets. In the alternate timeline it seems that racism would generally be seen as the “enemy”s thing and less people would be outwardly racist but the racists would be emboldened by the nazis.
7:16 look a smiling clown
Lolol
I saw that too. Somebody has to edit that and make it look legit like a clown
I already saw it before reading this
God damn
Rofl My Waffles it gots the Peter chin
tHeY ShOUlD HAve TaKEN MOScow to WiN tHE WAr.
Richard Roberson They took more then Moscow and that wasn't the only divergence.
They'd have had firewood... then what? Moscow would be a loss, but Stalin already had plans for that case. He wouldn't surrender just because he lost a major city, and while Moscow held some logistic value, it wasn't crucial to the war effort.
Both Hitler and Stalin seemed to have understood that it wasn't Moscow that mattered, but Stalingrad, which was the key to the strategic resources.
Even if they took Moscow it wouldn't change the outcome, napoleon did the same thing and even took Moscow and the results were the same
In times of Stalin Moscow was the hearth of the Soviet-Union. Capturing it would have been a critical blow unlike napoleonic era Moscow
@@hatefulgaming1800 I wasn't mocking the video.
*demonitized*
This was the way it should have went.
-🤡
Exactly.
what if Oswald Mosley became pm?
Interesting thought.
The Scotsman very interesting. Had Hitler not risen to power that would be a real possibility and maybe the UK could have been the bad guys.
@@kieran40k89
Nice Hearts of Iron playlist you got there m8, tell me more lol. Keep playing your cute games babe, just like the Jews want you to.
It's an interesting question. What a shame the thread was taken over by neo nazis
fnchrstphr
What a shame you're completely oblivious to the fact that we're all fucked, because everyone keeps blaming 'much evil Nazis'.
Do if operation unthinkable was launched
@Metsarebuff 22 ah yes comrade
The soviets would have rolled through the allies and conquered all of europe.
Well that scenario would be...
Unthinkable...
Soviets would counterattack, march 'till they get to the Rhine and be defeated 'till they get to Moscow later.
Francesco Nesi I gave the soviets a little bit of a luck in my timeline, but that’s what will basically happen.
I want to see the Japanese version of this scenario.
he already made the timeline
"Russians would not tolerate genocidal maniacs in control of their homeland"
Stalin???
boiling the entire third position into "muh razisum and enslave da world" I was hoping that third positionist philosophy and economics would play a role in the Cold War scenario i guess not.
nice strawmans btw if you're smart you might be able to succeed in agriculture.
+Marshall Plane the entire history of mankind is war and slaughter, you would be hardpressed to find a civilization, political ideology, or a group of people worth their ink in the history books that didn't kill or conquer. Denouncing an entire philosophy because they killed people is weak and frankly a feminine argument.
should democracy and the representative Republic model be discredited for manifest destiny, and its near constant wars and corrupt finance capitalism?
should the achievements of Rome and the empires of antiquity be also discredited since they too where built on killing and Conquest?
where exactly does Hitler say he wanted to "enslave and conquer the world"
his books? notes from his staff? Any frist hand accounts even?
The whole narrative is retarded in the literal sense, "I think the Nazis are going to conquer and enslave everyone that isn't 100% pure Bavarian phenotype because I saw it in a movie and I played a video game that confirmed it"
+Benito Mussolini economic, cultural, political factors of Nazism and third positionism as a whole?
why read a book when I could just fill it with everything I don't like.
@@benitomussolini3108 You literally have no idea what Generalplan Ost was, do you?
Define to me why the Reichskommissariats were set up, what their purposes were, and what their relation to the Reichsgau was.
You probably never heard Himmler's speech about genociding the jews either, unless you see that as "propaganda".
I guess you wouldn't mind if the nazis came into power now and killed your entire family, because "Well the romans killed people aswell!"
"Generalplan Ost" is literally post war Soviet propoganda. It is complete nonsense that never appeared in contemporary German documentation.
US contribution to the Battle of the Atlantic was minimal until 1944, it was the Canadian navy's expansion, the Royal Navy's effectiveness and operational developments like enigma, long range air cover and OR won the u boat war in 1943. However without the US an invasion of occupied Europe would be impossible.
Wouldn't have been impossible the European theater just would have taken longer. Not saying that we didn't need them though, since they helped a great deal at Omaha and boxing in the Nazis by going through Italy and of course Japan.
Britain was essential because without a free Britain we would have a very hard time trying to touch down in France.
Canada was essential to the Battle of Britain, the liberation of the Low Countries, and helping the US transport supplies to the British.
The Free French, The Polish, the Czechoslovakians, and the Norwegians etc each received training in Britain by British and American forces and assisted both in frontline combat and assisted in gathering intelligence from inside Fortress Europe (examples are Witold Pilecki, and Max Manus and others).
The Danish even under occupation helped to smuggle most of their Jewish population into neutral territories like Sweden saving 7,220 lives.
Soviet Russia had managed to bulldoze their way through Eastern Europe at the expense of over half its army and were the first to penetrate Germany itself and before that even struck fear into the Nazis at the fail of their Blitzkrieg.
Point is, every one of the Allied Nations had a part to play and it wouldn't be fair to narrow it down to a single winner among them.
@Whatifalthist One of the major reasons why the Americans couldn't completely win Vietnam was because of Chinese and Russian support. With that taken out of the picture, the US could easily invade North Vietnam without having to worry about China or the Soviets starting WW3. nbot to mention the Chinese would probably help the Americans win the war invading from the North.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 "Russia won't stand to have a genocidal maniac in control of the Russian heart land" I guess Stalin doesn't count?
Surprisingly well researched and minimally political. Damn near as objective as you can expect on current UA-cam. Subscribed.
"I dont think the Russians cared about Moscow at all." Napoleon to Hitler, 1943
"The Russians wouldn't stand for having genocidal maniacs in control of their homeland."
Lenin, Stalin and their soviets begg to differ.
Lenin, stalin and the soviets being literal genocidal maniacs💀
The difference is, the germans are exterminating them
Great scenario though I’m a little doubtful about Britain being starved out. Britain’s lifeblood was the sea and the German navy was extremely pitiful. Oh, except for the Bismarck but that was sunk just before the invasion of Russia.
Hitler’s best chance at dominating Europe would likely require a ceasefire with the UK, seeing as how Churchill was so adamant about not surrendering.
@@Winston.S.Churchill I doubt it Churchill would have fought tooth and nail before that would happen
We can all agree.
That the Kaiserreich scenario is the best alt-history.
@Germania No fuhrerreich is a alt his about a nightmare
Had to stop watching as his voice gets on my nerves
martin quinn It’s very feminine, isn’t it?
Moscowwwwww
He continuesly butchers a lot of words...
Sounds like a basic girl ordering a "latteeeee" 🙄
He sounds way to cocky and you get the feeling and by reading facts. He is not knowing what he he is talking about. He just played a lot of HOI4 and suddenly he is an expert.
Oh boy the comments are going to be a dumpster fire.
The amount of heat coming from the comments could warm the werchmat all the way to Alaska
Metsarebuff 22 as opposed to flaky witness reports and edited photos?
@@eeeonsphere3327
First one!
lol
Watch EUROPA The Last Battle
One thing you did miss was Stalin was going to pull a Hitler and not leave Moscow. If the Germans did take Moscow, Stalin either gets captured or pulls a Hitler.
I really like how you didn’t just replace the USSR with Germany, and actually gave it some character
"That was the longest video I ever made." Now he has a 30 minute minimum.
Wow! This is a very interesting topic to go over. This video was very interesting.thank you!
The part on Africa is false, the Germans actually had no plan to extertminate the Africans or subjugate them in any way. They were included in volunteer SS and Wehrmacht divisions in North Africa, and were to be allowed to live in Reichkomissariat styled colonies, or even in independent Fascist Adjacent puppet states in the lands not desireable for Germany itself to directly manage. They had the same level of respect for the African peoples than they did for the Japanese. And German propaganda even called the Ku Klux Klan barbarians for their display of anti-african behaviour. Germany during ww2 wasn't just out to murder everyone not German, this is a horrible misconception that people have, for reasons that are obvious to some, and unknown to others.
P.S: that racial map is extremely incorrect.
The Americans were considered subhuman, besides the few German migrants that maintained German values.
Blacks were treated much like Native Americans in that they were both respected as not aryan but "noble" as it was put there, though no mention of them being savages. So long as they did not mix races, they were left to their own devices.
The only real subhumans according to the Nazis, were Jews, mixed Europeans in the outer colonies, Russians, Communists, the disabled and people with "alternate lifestyles."
😂😂 what do load of BS. We were animals in their eyes they were exterminating Africans before they did thae same acts to Jewish people.
@@admirekashiri9879 Nazeesi Symapthizers and their nonsense. Next they'll say they never hated jews due to the nobel one that hitler liked
Something overlooked in History when it comes to WWII:
"The Greeks delayed by two or more vital months the German attack against Russia; if we did not have this long delay, the outcome of the war would have been different"
- Hitler's Chief Of Staff.
"We Thank the Greek people whose resistance decided WWII...
You fought unarmed and won, small against big...
You gave us time to defend ourselves"
- Joseph Stalin.
@Leo Mittas True.
What's more fascinating is Greece held against the Germans more than any other European country.
While France the "superpower" at the time fell in 43 days.
Greece gave a good fight, stalling the Germans plans by resisting a total of 219 days. More than any other European country.
You're forgetting about Rasputitsa: The season when roads become difficult to traverse due to thawing snow in the spring time....
I really liked this a lot!!! Bravo! One of the best if not the best Nazi alt scenario I have ever watched on UA-cam.
Everything in this video is wrong. From your faulty understanding of National Socialism, "racism", the Soviet Union, WW2, the U.S. and Asia, to the scenario itself, you are dead wrong about everything in this video. Please, find a historical source that isn't American propaganda, and then you’ll have potential as an alternate historian.
@Zeke Bean Okay, I’ll bite.
Here’s my scenario:
Direct funding by Germany leads the National Socialist Movement of Chile to amass greater resources. That is to say, weapons and more propaganda. This propaganda helps them spread their message across Chile, attracting many more followers to their cause. Thus, the 1938 chilean coup attempt ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seguro_Obrero_massacre#Coup ) happens much earlier, in 1935. It’s works out wonderfully. Seeing the success of the coup, the Nazi high command decide to fund more such projects around South America. In our timeline, Hitler amassed great popularity with the Germans in Paraguay. In this timeline, both his popularity and weapons from the German high command lead a National Socialist Party of Paraguay to successfully coup the government in 1936.
This process repeats itself in the following years, with the United States attempting to safeguard their influence by intervening in Peru on Christmas Eve, 1936. With the Great Depression alive and well, and with little popularity amongst both the soldiers and generals, this would fail miserably. The intervention would be seen as an imperialist action by most of Central and South America. Previously, there had been some uncertainty amongst the Central and South Americans on Germany. Some saw them as liberators that fought back against capitalism and corrupt statism, while others saw them as merely making a power play. However, after the intervention, the former view would become the general consensus.
By the start of the war, Chile, Paraguay, Peru and Argentina are all ruled by Fascist or National Socialist governments. A South American council exists amongst the states, with it’s main goal being to ensure economic cooperation, as well as to diplomatically solve border conflicts. The other South American states are all aligned with the U.S. The only exception to this being Brazil. After the soldiers of the American-backed general Mascarenhas clashed with the paramilitary soldiers of Plínio Salgado, nearly bringing the country into civil war, the Brazilian public turned against both the United States and Germany. The Brazilian monarchy was brought back, with the Emperor ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Pedro_Henrique_of_Orléans-Braganza ), holding strong sympathies for the United Kingdom.
When the war begins, the German-aligned South American states cut off all exports to the Allies. Aware of the sympathies of the Brazilian emperor, Britain gets pissed when Brazil refuses to join the war. After enough complaining, and nearly a declaration of war, Brazil too cuts of all exports to the Allies.
The rest of the war goes as it did in our timeline. However, with fewer resources, equipment production in the UK slows to a halt. Thus, the Allies can’t afford to expend as many soldiers. Dunkirk, for an example, isn’t as big as it was in our timeline.
During all this, Germany refuses to ally with Japan. Instead, they focus on building relations with Turkey. Like the non-aggression pact that was signed between the Soviets and Turkey twenty years earlier ( en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Moscow_(1921) ), a peace pact is signed between Turkey and Germany.
With the failed intervention in Peru in mind, intervention is viewed much more negatively in this timeline. The America First Committee gathers a large amount of support from both the American public and elites. A much greater focus is placed on conserving and assisting capitalism, as well as entrepreneurship. With these two factors in mind, the U.S. oil embargo on Japan never happens, as both the general public and rich elite fear the damaging of trade, and the loss of American economic growth. Both the Brits and the Dutch also don't carry out the embargo, due to scant resources. Roosevelt is forced to bow to capitalist pressure, though he still tries to squeeze in some social democratic policies here and there. Truman would suddenly be assassinated in 1943, leading the isolationist Robert Rice Reynolds to become vice-president to Roosevelt (much to the latter's dismay, due to the former’s opposition to Roosevelt’s reforms). Eventually, he himself would become president upon Roosevelt's death.
With fewer Allied soldiers on the western front, more German soldiers are sent to the eastern front. As such, they manage to win the battle of Stalingrad and push into the Caucasus. Initially, their tanks are stopped by the lack of infrastructure in the region, and their soldiers can’t advance on foot due to partisans in the mountains. On the condition that they be given control over their oil fields from Britain, and be granted control over Azerbaijan once the war is over, Iran joins the war on the side of Germany. Though the soviets try to invade them through Central Asia, they are knocked back by Iran when the Luftwaffe gives them a sizable number of planes.
Eventually, peace is signed between the parties. The Soviet Union would soon break into a dozen separate pieces, with ethnic and political tensions dominating life for the Soviet population.
What about Japan, then? As stated, the embargo never happens in this timeline. As such, both the IJA the IJN focus more on China. By 1945, they have managed to conquer most of it, though the terrain of both Northwestern and Southwestern China make the IJA soldiers easy to ambush and hard to supply. As such, the Japanese stop their conquest, for the time being. With the administration of Dutch Indonesia in chaos, the Japanese swoop in and create a puppet state that stretches from Sumatra to the western parts of the Cilacap Regency, with the charismatic Sukarno as leader. Everything beyond this point is under control of the dutch colonists. Seeking a strongman that can unite the peninsula and purge the government of both incompetent and disloyal characters, the economic elite behind the Dutch East India Company put the despotic Raymond Westerling in charge. The city of Semarang would become the post-war Berlin of this timeline, with one section controlled by the Japanese puppet, and the other by the Dutch colonial administration, with both being the administrative capitals of their respective sides.
With german submarines and aircraft harassing the British, they eventually give up the fight and peace out. This greatly angers and demoralizes both the British public, old guard politicians, and aristocracy. Left-wing radicalism soon starts to grow. In 1947, two years after the end of the war, a communist revolution would overthrow both the British parlament and the monarchy. Using the chaos to their advantage, the colonies and dominions soon break away.
In the aftermath of the war, the United States public, now long past the great depression, would begin to support more expansionist and aggressive measures. Having generally supported the capitalist views of most Americans at the time, the Republican party would soon take a heel turn and become nationalistic. As they continually support whatever views the public has, the Republican party would be seen as the party of the masses, and would soar in popularity. Storm Thurmond (a member of the Republican party in this timeline) is soon elected, and his first course of action is to seize control over Greenland.
By 1952, the IJN would have managed to conquer most of China and Mongolia, though instability greatly plagues their puppet state. Britain, at this point, would have become interested in spreading the revolution into Ireland, while retaining sour tensions with Germany. Germany begins a giant bunker project along the coast fo France, and has started to put pressure on Spain and Portugal. Japan looks at Australia and New Zealand, helpless without the royal navy, and foams at the mouth. A cold war would has begun to develop between a reinvigorated United States, well-fortified Germany and ambitious Japan.
Which one of these great powers will see the sunlight, in these dark times? Or will they all fight, until it is blocked out forever?
That’s my take on this scenario. Anyone else have an idea regarding how the Germans could have won, as well as the aftermath? I’m genuinely quite curious.
@@icyguy2547 well written mate
@@denizaydemir6756 Thank you
@Zeke Bean I don’t have a channel that posts videos, however, I have a few interesting playlists on my channel. I should also mention that I comment on a lot of alternate history videos, often giving suggestions for scenarios, most notably on Monsieur Z’s channel.
Also, for my source on South American fascism, see this: ua-cam.com/video/Nf0-ui3uKWI/v-deo.html . The rest of the stream is really interesting too, with the way they talk about modern South American history and politics.
@@icyguy2547 Due this is weird but it makes me happy you really had a well thought out scenario of your own to tell in relation to your criticism a lot of people online don't do that but you put in the effort cheers to you mate
Wait? A world where no Red Hammer and Shackle in the Eastern site of the planet? Well, wasn't so bad
Sickle...Not "shackle". Smarten the fuck up.
Eh, I'd probably still be fine in this world.
Maybe a bit poorer.
Nah you won’t exist
@@BirdTurdMemes I wouldn't exist if this world was more racist. Im like 30% asian bro
@@sebastianlee6695 your ancestors can flee to Asia though???
The problem still remains, in the fact that racism between different Asians would still exist
I would probably be fine in this world cause i'm an indigenous Indonesian, but the Chinese-Indonesian and Papuan wouldn't had the same fate though. Indonesian economy might be much larger than it is right now cause we might ally with the US
Loved the video. I hope YT doesn't demonetize it. Nevertheless, good job.
I hope it does
@@aisel1483 - You're a year late. It hasn't been demonetised.
Ok
Lol
Except that UA-cam wouldn't demonetize something that agrees with them, so yeah.
You know i like all your timeline when the germans win worldwar 2 because I believe they are the most accurate.The only thing wrong with them is that stallin saw leaving a city as sign of weakness so he would likely be captured along with most of the russian government ended the war but i like this so much i want to ingore this
"Americans beat both Germany and Japan"
- 80% of German Casualties were on the Eastern Front
- USSR losses only second to China
- USSR took Berlin
- US's biggest application of force up in Europe up to 1944 was lend-leasing to the Soviets
I will not lie and say the US did nothing, actually, the US was the main fighter against Japan, and helped a lot in Europe, but that phrase is filled to the brim with American Exceptionalism. Americans *helped* beat Germany, in that part, most of the heavy lifting was done by the Soviets. On the other hand, aside from the Manchuria Campaign, the USSR barely had any hand in Japan, so that phrase is justified in the second part.
75% of the Luftwaffe was on the Western Front in 1943 and yet they still had air superiority.
We’d be able to afford a house, and our media wouldn’t be so corrupt
????????
Holy shit bitchute is coming at full storm on this comment section
The media would be all propaganda
finally someone who realises that the ussr wouldn’t surrender the second that moscow got captured.
Cmon the us was not the only country that fought against Japan so many others were vital. The first Japanese defeat of the entire war was from the Australians in the Kokoda campaign.
Exactly.
No offense, but while we do appreciate Australia, And ESPECIALLY, China, Australia really didn’t do anything major..
Fun fact: Germany had Slavic, French, African, and Arab soldiers. Muslim and Christians fought shoulder to shoulder with Germany. Germany understood who really was causing the division...
Nope
they were used to fight against colonial nations, yeah. they weren't considered equal.
@@lmao.3661 They were seen as equals. Many of them were allowed to join the waffen SS.
TIK did a video about that and it was all very racial. Plus it was more for propaganda purposes if you could convince English to join you than you can betray the war anyway you want it too. The only thing your other is how effective German propaganda was
Nazi..
Fun fact: Canada was mostly responsible for americas achievements in ww2 when it came to pushing the germans back
16,112,566 Americans served in WW2.
1.1 million Canadians served in WW2.
America had 6,768 ships in WW2.
Canada had 434 Ships in WW2.
108,410 Tanks, 257,390 and Artillery made by America in WW2.
50,000 Canadian tanks made (which was probably just an extension of America’s industry anyway and most where made by America)
295,959 American planes served in WW2
16,000 Canadian planes served in ww2. (Which is probably again an extension of American Industry.)
That doesn’t make any sense💀💀
tbh except for the genocide and nazi ideologies, this scenario sounds a lot better than our timeline.
- no communism in eastern europe
- no/delayed feminism
- no wokeness
- 50 million chinese are saved from famine, and get to enjoy a much higher standard of living
Deranged take
@@TurtleChad1 how are any of the timeline changes I mentioned a bad thing?
In other words:
"The mass genocide and enslavement of Eastern Europeans is better than Soviet apartment blocks"
Also why would the Chinese have a better standard of living lol?
@@TurtleChad1 got triggered?
Then the world would be a better place. We’d have Japanese tech, German philosophy and Italian fashion.
Yep
There is absolutely no way vietnam becomes communist in a timeline where china is nationalist, the only reason the north Vietnamese survived was because there was no way to militarily invade them with ground forces without provoking china. If china was against north vietnam, south vietnam would win.
Good things in this timeline: No crazy leftist movements in the west. Bad things: Everything else
There were tests done during ww2 and it was determined that Britain could survive with no imports
LOLL
*There would be no "What If" videos: The End.*
To be fair, Latin America is white, Most Brazilians descended from Portugeese, more Mexicans descended from Spain, most Argentinians descended from Italians, most Belize people descended from British, Latin Americans are white. Minus the native population of course.
Nop, as a Brazilian my self, there are more blacks then anyone here, but depending on the region u are u will probably see more whites.
Well London wouldn't be Majority Muslim like it is now... Paris wouldn't be on fire....
We'd be living like angels amongst the stars
I Would like to hold a 6 second crying break before we move onto more depressing material
Alternate Title: The timeline that Whatifalthist would love.
Based rudyward