42:25 Just like Gaston, his main motivation is to have BELL! (Taco Bell noise.) He really wants this bell that has gems inside, *BECAUSE THE WRITERS DON’T KNOW HOW BELLS WORK.*
Biff weed is the only person who could make a 50 minute review video as a trojan horse to propose a matchup of lightning mcqueen vs the surf's up main penguin
41:37 Okay, let’s start by formulating this problem with all of our assumptions laid out: “In a group of 21 people, there are exactly 2 people from the UK. Each person in the group is given a Lego minifigure pack. Each pack contains exactly one of 18 possible characters, where each character has an equal probability of being in the pack. One of these possible characters is Pochahontas. What is the probability that each person in the group from the UK receives a Pocahontas minifigure, while nobody else in the group does?” We can start by naming the people in this group. Actually, we can just number them: person #1 to person #21. To keep things simple, we can say that the first two people are the people from the UK, since we can number these people in whatever order we want. Now, person #1 has a 1/18 probability of receiving Pochahontas. The same goes for person #2. The probability that *both* of these people receive Pochahontas is (1/18) * (1/18), or (1/18)^2. You can simplify this to 1/324, but I’ll just leave it as (1/18)^2 for now. As for person #3 onward, remember, we want the probability that *none* of them receive Pochahontas-in other words, how likely it is that they all receive one of the other 17 possible characters. Person #3 has a 17/18 probability of receiving a character *other than* Pocahontas. Person #4 has the same 17/18 probability. This holds true for each of the 19 people in the group who are not from the UK. (It’s also true for the other 2, but we’re just focusing on the non-UK people right now.) Multiplying all 19 of these 17/18 probabilities together, we get (17/18)^19. This is the probability that all 19 of these people receive a character other than Pochahontas. We’re almost done. Now we just have to find the probability that both of the UK people receive Pochahontas *and* none of the non-UK people don’t. This just means multiplying the two probabilities we’ve found together, giving us (1/18)^2 * (17/18)^19. With that, we have found the probability we were looking for. If you want the approximate value of this, it’s about 1 in 960. (That’s the probability of getting any given starting position in chess960. Holy hell!) For those curious, we can also start with the assumption that there are exactly 2 Pochahontas minifigures in the mix from the start. That means that there must be exactly 2 people in the group who receive Pochahontas. So, we just need to find out the probability that of the 21 people in the group, the 2 UK people are chosen to receive Pochahontas. The number of ways you can choose 2 people from a group of 21 is called 21 choose 2. For your first choice, where you choose who receives Pochahontas #1, there are 21 possible people to choose; then for your second choice, Pocahontas #2, the remaining number of options is 20. If each Pochahontas minifigure were distinct from each other, then this would give us 21 * 20 = 420 possible ways to choose the 2 people in the group of 21. However, this would be overcounting it, since we don’t care which Pochahontas is given out in what order. To remove the dependence on order, we divide by the number of ways to order the 2 Pochahontas minifigures, which is 2. So we have 420/2 = 210, meaning that 21 choose 2 = 210. Since all the ways of choosing 2 people out of 21 are equally likely, this means that the probability that the two UK people receive the two Pochahontases is 1 in 210. Alright, that about does it for what I wanted to talk about. To me, probability and combinatorics are really interesting topics-well, I guess most things involving math are interesting to me, and probability and combinatorics have a pretty average ranking in that list. I’m kinda disappointed that I didn’t end up getting a good opportunity to talk about Bernoulli trials here (named for Jacob Bernoulli, uncle of Daniel Bernoulli, inventor of Bernoulli’s principle, the namesake of Franceso Bernoulli), but at least I saved myself a bit of work. Anyway, thanks for reading!
That Tim Hill ranking is sounding mighty appetizing, not gonna lie. I'd definitely give it a watch. Also, I am *so* hyped for Schaff's version of this video. I cannot get enough of him ranting about things he despises to the core.
I remember when you brought up your Letterboxd in your Animation Studios' Debut Films ranking, my first assumption was that you and Nem were gonna rank Godzilla movies, so seeing this instead was definitely a shock. Not that I'm complaining though, I always like tuning in to the Biff's videos!
19:18 I think you doing an another Pixar ranking but only 2010s film will been alright idea to do or just a cars analysis video all of the films like other reviewers like Unlucky Tug imo Anyway nice weird coincidence ranking of the funny crab man least favorite/worst movies, tbh I think got into Schaffrillas through your 10 favorite channels feature tab on your channel & I been fan of his content ever since his Pixar ranking so thank for that & I did like at you & Nemesis did post same type video on same today again ever since like yours guys reviews on first half of season 9 of db I think? And nice doing something different then db. Once again nice video & can’t wait what new content videos you cooking next.
I’m aware Cars 2 isn’t a good movie, but I always enjoy watching it. It’s never boring, and is so balls to wall that I can’t help but be entertained. It’s the only Pixar film that goes insane, and I kinda like it for that.
48:25 This is an understandably common mistake. 2007 was actually the year when Illumination was founded, upon which approximately 2.3% of members of the Christian faith simultaneously experienced a searing prophetic vision of a horrific Easter-themed film whose release would spell the gradual and painful demise of humanity. Hop itself was released in 2011.
Oh don’t worry I know Hop is from 2011. I used to have a really dumb bit with a friend in high school where we’d say movies that didn’t release in 2007 released in 2007. I don’t know why because there’s no punchline and it wasn’t especially funny, but I decided to throw it in here anyway even though nobody else would ever get it without it being explained. Purely for my own self indulgence.
Nem has pitched to me the idea of ranking the third film in every animated trilogy, but then I double checked what the lineup would be and I just don't think it would be a very fun marathon to go through or an interesting video where 90% of the movies are under Disney or Dreamworks.
If I went through with it I would intentionally leave Open Season 3 out. Even people who ironically love the first movie have said that the third is a completely worthless experience, I'm not subjecting myself to that
41:37 I literally reacted to this like Benny from The Lego Movie did when he was finally allowed to build a spaceship. You will be hearing from me with a very lengthy and math-infused comment soon enough.
41:37 I did the math on this and unless i made an error somewhere (which is entirely possible because this took a while to calculate) there is approximately a 1/859 chance of this happening
Thank you both for your efforts, but I must say, the lack of showing your work is a significant detriment. I will begin working on this problem myself. Also, Golden lily, nice profile picture. Joe Thomas, that's not meant as an insult to your profile picture, but it kinda just looks like the default one. For what it's worth, I like the color blue.
Okay, so I actually did work it out. Just to quickly recap the comment I already wrote, here's how I formulated the problem: “In a group of 21 people, there are exactly 2 people from the UK. Each person in the group is given a Lego minifigure pack. Each pack contains exactly one of 18 possible characters, where each character has an equal probability of being in the pack. One of these possible characters is Pochahontas. What is the probability that each person in the group from the UK receives a Pocahontas minifigure, while nobody else in the group does?" As for the solution, I determined that each UK person has a 1/18 probability of receiving Pochahontas, so that's a (1/18)^2 probability that they both receive one. Then each non-UK person has a 17/18 probability of not receiving Pochahontas, so that's a (17/18)^19 probability that none of them receive Pochahontas. Multiplying these probabilities together, the answer to the original question is (1/18)^2 * (17/18)^19, about 1/960, like Joe Thomas said. Now I'm curious: Golden lily, what did you do to solve this problem? I'm curious how you got the answer you did.
I really got bored from Dinosaur. I almost feel asleep. I like Ready Player One and Ralph 2. I was mildly entertained from Ice Age 5 and was bored with 4. I was somewhat amused with Turbo a little and despise Home. Pocahontas I didn't mind though I think having three animal sidekicks was too much.
I've considered that before, same with ranking all their sequels, but I just don't feel strongly enough about most of those movies to want to actually go through with it. I like most of them, even love some of them, but I just don't have that same level of passion for almost any of them.
Every single movie ranking (SPOILERS) 1: Bottle Rocket 2: Dinosaur 3: Brave 4: Tenet 5: Cars 2 6: Happy Feet 2 7: Ralph Breaks the Internet 8: Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker 9: Ice Age: Collision Course 10: Always 11: Turbo 12: Pocahontas 13: The Hunchback of Notre Dame II 14: Earwig and the Witch 15: Hop 16: Surf's Up 2: Wavemania
The fact this was planned before he announced the final Sandwich Six video is insane timing
We got people making Schaffrillas videos before Schaffrillas does 💀
I call dibs on ranking the dead centers of these lists
I call dibs on ranking his 1st place Mario Kart battle mode stages (I only played 3 Mario Kart games)
Mario Kart always had an even number. Good luck.
RE-APPOINTMENT IN THE GAME OF LIFE!
Fawful’s Minion cameo 🔥
42:25 Just like Gaston, his main motivation is to have BELL! (Taco Bell noise.) He really wants this bell that has gems inside, *BECAUSE THE WRITERS DON’T KNOW HOW BELLS WORK.*
Biff weed is the only person who could make a 50 minute review video as a trojan horse to propose a matchup of lightning mcqueen vs the surf's up main penguin
41:37 Okay, let’s start by formulating this problem with all of our assumptions laid out:
“In a group of 21 people, there are exactly 2 people from the UK. Each person in the group is given a Lego minifigure pack. Each pack contains exactly one of 18 possible characters, where each character has an equal probability of being in the pack. One of these possible characters is Pochahontas. What is the probability that each person in the group from the UK receives a Pocahontas minifigure, while nobody else in the group does?”
We can start by naming the people in this group. Actually, we can just number them: person #1 to person #21. To keep things simple, we can say that the first two people are the people from the UK, since we can number these people in whatever order we want.
Now, person #1 has a 1/18 probability of receiving Pochahontas. The same goes for person #2. The probability that *both* of these people receive Pochahontas is (1/18) * (1/18), or (1/18)^2. You can simplify this to 1/324, but I’ll just leave it as (1/18)^2 for now.
As for person #3 onward, remember, we want the probability that *none* of them receive Pochahontas-in other words, how likely it is that they all receive one of the other 17 possible characters. Person #3 has a 17/18 probability of receiving a character *other than* Pocahontas. Person #4 has the same 17/18 probability. This holds true for each of the 19 people in the group who are not from the UK. (It’s also true for the other 2, but we’re just focusing on the non-UK people right now.) Multiplying all 19 of these 17/18 probabilities together, we get (17/18)^19. This is the probability that all 19 of these people receive a character other than Pochahontas.
We’re almost done. Now we just have to find the probability that both of the UK people receive Pochahontas *and* none of the non-UK people don’t. This just means multiplying the two probabilities we’ve found together, giving us (1/18)^2 * (17/18)^19. With that, we have found the probability we were looking for. If you want the approximate value of this, it’s about 1 in 960. (That’s the probability of getting any given starting position in chess960. Holy hell!)
For those curious, we can also start with the assumption that there are exactly 2 Pochahontas minifigures in the mix from the start. That means that there must be exactly 2 people in the group who receive Pochahontas. So, we just need to find out the probability that of the 21 people in the group, the 2 UK people are chosen to receive Pochahontas.
The number of ways you can choose 2 people from a group of 21 is called 21 choose 2. For your first choice, where you choose who receives Pochahontas #1, there are 21 possible people to choose; then for your second choice, Pocahontas #2, the remaining number of options is 20. If each Pochahontas minifigure were distinct from each other, then this would give us 21 * 20 = 420 possible ways to choose the 2 people in the group of 21. However, this would be overcounting it, since we don’t care which Pochahontas is given out in what order. To remove the dependence on order, we divide by the number of ways to order the 2 Pochahontas minifigures, which is 2. So we have 420/2 = 210, meaning that 21 choose 2 = 210. Since all the ways of choosing 2 people out of 21 are equally likely, this means that the probability that the two UK people receive the two Pochahontases is 1 in 210.
Alright, that about does it for what I wanted to talk about. To me, probability and combinatorics are really interesting topics-well, I guess most things involving math are interesting to me, and probability and combinatorics have a pretty average ranking in that list. I’m kinda disappointed that I didn’t end up getting a good opportunity to talk about Bernoulli trials here (named for Jacob Bernoulli, uncle of Daniel Bernoulli, inventor of Bernoulli’s principle, the namesake of Franceso Bernoulli), but at least I saved myself a bit of work. Anyway, thanks for reading!
Biff Weed now doing the negative sister video to Nem's positive one? What sport of madness is this?
I'm gonna do a "every schaffrilas halfway point movie ranked" video
I’d watch that!
I'm subscribing to you. You better deliver within 2025
@@mattiismouse1086Oh boy
That Tim Hill ranking is sounding mighty appetizing, not gonna lie. I'd definitely give it a watch.
Also, I am *so* hyped for Schaff's version of this video. I cannot get enough of him ranting about things he despises to the core.
Biff Weed and Schafrillas? Yeah, this will be peak.
Nice Biff-Schafrillas compilation!
Was that silver spoon from inanimate insanity? Yeah it was.
This is the funniest coincidence I’ve seen in a while
47:12 thank god the Sonic movies exist so James Marsden can be in good films 😂.
2:07 yooo fawful's minion
I remember when you brought up your Letterboxd in your Animation Studios' Debut Films ranking, my first assumption was that you and Nem were gonna rank Godzilla movies, so seeing this instead was definitely a shock. Not that I'm complaining though, I always like tuning in to the Biff's videos!
Nah Godzilla is next year hopefully. Haven’t been able to get through as many of those as I wanted while I worked on this
I call dibs on ranking the Star Wars films based on their sound effects before Schaff.
The Biff Weed creativity knows no bounds
Watch, at some point during this list, Biff will start his own version of the Schaffrillas sandwich six
19:22 SILVER SPOON?!?! Biff I lowk never realized you enjoyed peak
OSC W
19:18 I think you doing an another Pixar ranking but only 2010s film will been alright idea to do or just a cars analysis video all of the films like other reviewers like Unlucky Tug imo
Anyway nice weird coincidence ranking of the funny crab man least favorite/worst movies, tbh I think got into Schaffrillas through your 10 favorite channels feature tab on your channel & I been fan of his content ever since his Pixar ranking so thank for that & I did like at you & Nemesis did post same type video on same today again ever since like yours guys reviews on first half of season 9 of db I think? And nice doing something different then db. Once again nice video & can’t wait what new content videos you cooking next.
TIM HILL RANKING OR BUST
I’m aware Cars 2 isn’t a good movie, but I always enjoy watching it. It’s never boring, and is so balls to wall that I can’t help but be entertained. It’s the only Pixar film that goes insane, and I kinda like it for that.
It’s a very quotable and unforgettable movie. It will always be the bomb.
There are Pixar movies that are worse than cars 2
@@gatewoodanimations9753 absolutely.
@@gatewoodanimations9753 i would say yeah after the og pixar ranking video was made I would put Lightyear definitely as the worst one.
As someone who loved cars 2 with all his heart whether ironically or not, I always get sad when people say it’s one of the worst movies of all time
This idea is really funny to me and not a bad one, will watch both videos soon
My poor little 3 year old son will die of sadness unless you do the Tim Hill ranking 😢.
For the best animated features winner, Brave is no longer the last place. It was happy feet 1. Check out his letterbox’s for a proof.
I knew about the change but the idea was just to stick with what ranked last in the original videos.
For some ungodly reason, I watched Cars 2 many times as a kid. Probably because I literally had nothing else to do.
A Tim Hill ranking would be pretty fun, or just a ranking for rather obscure directors.
the tim hill ranking would go hard
2:06 Holy based Fawful’s Minion
Do the Tim Hill ranking, hell if you don't wanna suffer alone, I'm down to collab since I've watched a lot of Tim Hill movies lol
Plz do the tim hill ranking i need to hear youre opinoin on garfield a tale of 2 kittied
28:48 I still remember my entire theatre erupting into laughter at “I’m the spy!” 💀
49:34 Arthur Christmas Mention!
I also bought Garfield: A Tale of Two Kitties
48:25 This is an understandably common mistake. 2007 was actually the year when Illumination was founded, upon which approximately 2.3% of members of the Christian faith simultaneously experienced a searing prophetic vision of a horrific Easter-themed film whose release would spell the gradual and painful demise of humanity. Hop itself was released in 2011.
Oh don’t worry I know Hop is from 2011. I used to have a really dumb bit with a friend in high school where we’d say movies that didn’t release in 2007 released in 2007. I don’t know why because there’s no punchline and it wasn’t especially funny, but I decided to throw it in here anyway even though nobody else would ever get it without it being explained. Purely for my own self indulgence.
@ Cool, glad to have that explained.
As the biggest Happy Feet 2 fan around, I will absolutely take it not being completely hated as a massive W
Now we need someone to do Every Schaffrillas Middle Place Movie Ranked
For Cars 3 you can do "Ranking every 2010 Pixar movies".
Disappointment in the Game of Life
19:18 every best film from each Trilogy of animated movies, or every duology could be included too
Nem has pitched to me the idea of ranking the third film in every animated trilogy, but then I double checked what the lineup would be and I just don't think it would be a very fun marathon to go through or an interesting video where 90% of the movies are under Disney or Dreamworks.
@@BiffWeed Oh c'mon, Biff, you telling me you don't wanna watch Open Season 3?
If I went through with it I would intentionally leave Open Season 3 out. Even people who ironically love the first movie have said that the third is a completely worthless experience, I'm not subjecting myself to that
@@BiffWeed Fair enough
It is objectively one of the worst animated films of all time
Disappintment in the game of life
41:37 I literally reacted to this like Benny from The Lego Movie did when he was finally allowed to build a spaceship.
You will be hearing from me with a very lengthy and math-infused comment soon enough.
The villain from Turbo got him into the Grand Prix because it would get him more attention
This should be fun..
29:39 Been in That exact scenario before. Never liked Collision Course, even as a kid who loved Continental Drift.
41:37
I did the math on this and unless i made an error somewhere (which is entirely possible because this took a while to calculate) there is approximately a 1/859 chance of this happening
I got ~1/960.
Thank you both for your efforts, but I must say, the lack of showing your work is a significant detriment. I will begin working on this problem myself.
Also, Golden lily, nice profile picture. Joe Thomas, that's not meant as an insult to your profile picture, but it kinda just looks like the default one. For what it's worth, I like the color blue.
Okay, so I actually did work it out. Just to quickly recap the comment I already wrote, here's how I formulated the problem:
“In a group of 21 people, there are exactly 2 people from the UK. Each person in the group is given a Lego minifigure pack. Each pack contains exactly one of 18 possible characters, where each character has an equal probability of being in the pack. One of these possible characters is Pochahontas. What is the probability that each person in the group from the UK receives a Pocahontas minifigure, while nobody else in the group does?"
As for the solution, I determined that each UK person has a 1/18 probability of receiving Pochahontas, so that's a (1/18)^2 probability that they both receive one. Then each non-UK person has a 17/18 probability of not receiving Pochahontas, so that's a (17/18)^19 probability that none of them receive Pochahontas. Multiplying these probabilities together, the answer to the original question is (1/18)^2 * (17/18)^19, about 1/960, like Joe Thomas said.
Now I'm curious: Golden lily, what did you do to solve this problem? I'm curious how you got the answer you did.
that's an
oddly specific thing to rank i must say
13:49 No way that was an accident, Biff, not a chance.
: )
I’m so glad someone else caught that 😂
I really got bored from Dinosaur. I almost feel asleep.
I like Ready Player One and Ralph 2. I was mildly entertained from Ice Age 5 and was bored with 4.
I was somewhat amused with Turbo a little and despise Home.
Pocahontas I didn't mind though I think having three animal sidekicks was too much.
Yooo didn't know you also watch Schaffrillas.
19:18 I guess just a 2010's Pixar ranking as a sequel to your 2000's one would work
I've considered that before, same with ranking all their sequels, but I just don't feel strongly enough about most of those movies to want to actually go through with it. I like most of them, even love some of them, but I just don't have that same level of passion for almost any of them.
17:46 finally! Someone say this!
I’m sitting here watching a spin off of someone else’s opinions. Some part of my brain must have a diabete.
bro saw the future, can you tell me the lottery numbers
Butter
Can you please make a 2010’s Pixar movie ranking?
Every single movie ranking (SPOILERS)
1: Bottle Rocket
2: Dinosaur
3: Brave
4: Tenet
5: Cars 2
6: Happy Feet 2
7: Ralph Breaks the Internet
8: Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker
9: Ice Age: Collision Course
10: Always
11: Turbo
12: Pocahontas
13: The Hunchback of Notre Dame II
14: Earwig and the Witch
15: Hop
16: Surf's Up 2: Wavemania
Ready Player One was awsome and I'll die on that hill
Wait, I tought this what from another channel.
I thought this was the Schaffrillas video lol.
In hindsight Turbo is indeed a terrible movie but I still have a soft spot for it because the Netflix show IS my childhood.
Ayy, I watched that too.
Not that I remember much.
69th like 😂