RMC Teese Wheels of Fire Wah comparison with Crybaby Standard and Kingbee Tele

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 жов 2024
  • Real McCoy WOF Wah-Wah compared side by side to the GCB-95 from Dunlop. The Teese is a vintage style, Macari flavored wah circuit. The pedalboard is from www.blackbirdpe... and I used my www.kingbeeguit... relic telecaster.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 96

  • @guitarnlax36
    @guitarnlax36 14 років тому +4

    i have the teese picture wah and it sounds great. No knobs or anything just a straight up wah supposed to be like the old clyde mccoy wahs which is why its called the picture wah because it has teese's pic on the back instead of clyde lol. I like mine a lot. It works with fuzz and heavy distortion without ossilation too. It also has a monster sweep i love mine

    • @mr.howard1
      @mr.howard1 Рік тому

      Me too... love mine. Also, I have an old Dunlop Hendrix model which is good, but the RMC is better.

  • @DamnDealDone
    @DamnDealDone 10 років тому +9

    When the RMC is actually set up correctly it slays the standard cry baby. The Cry Baby has a perfect sweep and the resonance is placed perfectly, but tonally it is pretty shrill and dull.

    • @kierenmoore3236
      @kierenmoore3236 6 років тому

      The Crybaby sounds 'better' to some, because it is the sound they know - a lot of players have used them ... but the Teeses are better / made much better, and can be dialed in, you're right ... ... :)

  • @psychfan21
    @psychfan21 12 років тому +2

    Still gotta go for the crybaby, this just confirmed it even more. "Fancy" doesn't mean better, it has some cool features, but the original crybaby has that classic tone that YOU make your own, not some tech specs at McCoy :) Thanks man, just ordered my Original GCB-95 Wah Wah yesterday

  • @Laitane93
    @Laitane93 14 років тому +1

    @thephamcookiemonster depends on which crybaby wahpedal you buy, but this one is without the spring. I think its better to have the version without the spring, cause you can leave the wah on to some good-sounding position and then you dont have to be pressing it all the time you play.

  • @Tipperman
    @Tipperman 13 років тому +1

    In my experience, the Teese wahs take a long time to get used to. The only one I have used is the RMC3 (with the internal tuning, not the newer model one). Took me a little over a year of fiddling every day to really get a good grasp on its functionality. The Teese is definitely a better wah once you figure out. My bandmate has a Wheels of Fire, and he melts faces with that thing.

  • @myfairvanity
    @myfairvanity 13 років тому

    do those knobs adjust the top and bottom of the sweep? the RMC is exactly what i'm looking for if the toe side would open a little bit more. i should state that my fav wah solo is "white room".

  • @alexpham095
    @alexpham095 14 років тому

    Does the crybaby stay in one place or does it spring back up?

  • @funkshop77
    @funkshop77 11 років тому

    I think he was talking about the RMC 5, not all the wahs. Anyway, the RMC it's good with all pickup configurations (if you know how to use it, of course)
    Hendrix used an italian Vox "Clyde Mc Coy" model.

  • @epitaph664
    @epitaph664 14 років тому

    the rmc is made to be vintage, and for that it is awesome. for a vintage sounding wah, nothing touches the rmc, but for some more wah tones the crybaby takes this one for $150 dollars left, but i still love the vintage sound of the rmc

  • @liamguitar09
    @liamguitar09 14 років тому

    Just got a Crybaby standard today and i seem to be getting this buzzing going through my amp whenever i turn the wah on, it changes in pitch as i move my foot up and down on it...anyone know how to solve this problem?

  • @TylerAnselmo11
    @TylerAnselmo11 11 років тому

    Hey man..Just a tip this wah wah was build for les pauls..You should of done the demo with a paul not a tele..even though you got the humbucker in the neck...Hence the WHEELS OF FIRE=Cream=Sg/Lespaul/es-335 it really shines on gibsons..Im a gibson man myself and Ive tried numerous wahs trying to find one with a deep enough sweep to actually sound like a fat wah and this ones the best.. by far

  • @guitar4life9
    @guitar4life9 13 років тому

    im looking for a super throaty wah sound, but i can't seem to find it. i have the signature buddy guy wah but it doesn't seem throaty enough to me. i play a les paul.

  • @thesjkexperience
    @thesjkexperience 13 років тому

    @guitar4life9 Try the RMC Wheels of Fire. GMD needs to run a little fuzz or OD after it to bring it to life, but the WOF is the throatiest wha I have played.

  • @ericgonzales2349
    @ericgonzales2349 6 років тому +1

    Plus the Crybaby isn't true bypass so it's still coloring the sound before it even hits the Teese.

    • @jrockofages5413
      @jrockofages5413 2 роки тому

      Great point that probably few picked up on...me included

  • @LearningTheBlues
    @LearningTheBlues 14 років тому

    What's the song at the beginning & end of this video?

  • @LearningTheBlues
    @LearningTheBlues 14 років тому

    ok, found it myself, song is called 'hong kong, mississippi' by Bodeco from the album 'bone, hair and hide'.

  • @Ncuab
    @Ncuab 14 років тому

    TEESE RMC WHEELS OF FIRE - sounds warmer, smoother, more transparent, and frequency sweep isn't as wide but bassier
    CRYBABY STANDARD - frequency sweep sounds brighter and can sound somewhat harsh at times, which might be what you're looking for
    ***as always, it depends on what other gear you're using, how all of your gear complements/works against each other, what sound you're looking for, how it feels, and what you're willing to pay***

  • @peterbennett26
    @peterbennett26 2 роки тому

    Cry baby seems to have the classic sound as heard from the heyday of the wah effect in the 70s, so gets my vote on this showing. Maybe RMC could be tweaked to match the classic sounding Cry baby, perhaps there’s already a UA-cam video of its versatility being demonstrated, and a set of ‘standard’ settings? Here the RMC sounds more mellow with some of the treble missing, but that could be just the sound someone wants for a guitar part in a song.

  • @CarvinTone
    @CarvinTone 13 років тому

    If you like Crybaby you have to consider the MXR CAE modifed Crybaby by Bob Bradshaw, dual real fazel inductors and boost switch. At $170 is a very decent priced. You see this one on more boards than anything else, it has that circuit diagram on top.
    I have heard a lot about this Tease wah, daddy like! A wah does not really come alive unless it is into an OD or some gain. That is always the true test of a good wah as many do not sound good when stacked, any wah sounds OK clean.

  • @JUMBOpin
    @JUMBOpin 14 років тому

    yes...especially when the potentiometer is so much better at cycling...love it

  • @hamcheesecola
    @hamcheesecola 11 років тому +2

    thanks to jack black for doing this video

  • @TheMidnightOnline
    @TheMidnightOnline 14 років тому

    Come on Jack, What about Roger Mayers Vision Wah??

  • @awesomejohnnet
    @awesomejohnnet 13 років тому

    I think the problem here may be that the Teese wah has so much more options and tweak-ability that it must be dailed in withose knobs properly for what you want. In this demo the Crybaby kicks all kind of ass... but in reality the Teese is by far the better wah.

  • @jovima69
    @jovima69 14 років тому

    Like GMD stated these are TOTALLY different wahs. The RMS is nice, as is the Crybaby. Just different.

  • @joakoPRIMUS
    @joakoPRIMUS 14 років тому

    dude please do a review of the MXR CAE WAH

  • @tenzel1231
    @tenzel1231 11 років тому

    What are u talking about? One of the best wah players ever(Hendrix) USED A STRAT so it doesnt matter what guitar you use.

  • @TheJurgisRud
    @TheJurgisRud 13 років тому

    @guitar4life9 Try the Jerry Cantrell signature Cry Baby by Dunlop. The JC95.

  • @stekks
    @stekks 14 років тому

    The RMC has a volume control and it's set to a lower than the cry baby... In almost all comparison videos the 'louder' one seems to have the better sound.

  • @popomczowzow
    @popomczowzow 14 років тому

    @ronkrisin
    for me the hendrix and the vox are about tied
    I should have said that somehow haha

  • @harryvanmeerveld318
    @harryvanmeerveld318 11 років тому +1

    Jack Black does guitar pedal reviews?

  • @JUMBOpin
    @JUMBOpin 14 років тому

    i think you should have compared it to a comperable crybaby [to me] you should pick up a Crybaby 535 or a 535q...amazing stuff

  • @grandrapidsufo
    @grandrapidsufo 12 років тому

    The Teese has a trimmer pot for the buffer on the inside. Max it out and then compare. Factory setting is too low.

  • @cheezewheel
    @cheezewheel 14 років тому

    crazy, neat sounds

  • @Horsantti
    @Horsantti 13 років тому

    Buy Zakk Wylde's signature series wah pedal. It's frikkin awesom. I recommend. It gives you some sort of little ruff but pretty awesom sound. Buy it and make a demo!

  • @GameLevelEditor
    @GameLevelEditor 14 років тому

    That other RMC is expensive and doesn't sound "great" woah thats nice to see that the standard Dunlop did some whoopin!

  • @popomczowzow
    @popomczowzow 14 років тому

    @bigtophalloween
    I know the Teese Picture (and wizard as well) absolutely rocks, but I was very disappointed at the WOF

  • @1234bainmorgan
    @1234bainmorgan 11 років тому

    i knew he played guitar but i had no idea he knew so much about equipment!!

  • @Rowanb1234
    @Rowanb1234 11 років тому

    think he was specifically talking about the RMC wah..

  • @bugsycline3798
    @bugsycline3798 6 років тому

    the real reason you don't want the crybaby, is because of the cheap components inside that allow radio frequencies to come blasting through your amp in the middle of a song.

  • @ders3286
    @ders3286 9 років тому +4

    Cry Baby wins for me. Even with the volume discrepancy (which I compensated for).

  • @badmuddy
    @badmuddy 10 років тому

    what i NEVER realized, being that i have ser# xxxxxxxx00, the original wof geoff & i collaborated on (& based on my settings), is that mine was made using his stoo-pitly amazing "halo" inductor (previously only used in his orig picture wah), which was his idea to use instead of the inductor he made for the rest of his line. it was my mistake to assume he would continue using the halo in the wof wah (which is what i named the 1st one, a custom job) in hte eventually released model later added to the roster.
    in the ensuing years, i'd been hearing/reading reviews of it that made NO sense to me, AT ALL, including a less-than-whelming opinion of it in about half the user feedback. even the notion of it being based on a macari, which i'd never even heard (knowingly) at the time i came up with the idea. what I was looking for was a vintage sounding wah, but with an outrageous vocal/bass-to-treble (my idea was to suck out the mids to get that, like i'd tried with a friend's rmc3; thank god geoff put in the halo, which smoothed the effect out!) sweep over a longer throw that i was just NOT hearing in anything else being built at the time, a sweep as throaty & wide as what i was getting from my digitech xp100 DIGITAL wah, just without hearing all the steps in between freq's, especially if sweeping slowly. i even played it over the phone to geoffrey. plus, i wanted a vol boost (w/ a center detent, & a click-off at the beginning of that pot, disconnecting a battery) and a q-pot. i wanted jimi-vowels ala "rainy day...," & eric-throat/grain ala "white room."
    geoffrey NAILED that, & that's what i expected others to hear, only, without the KEY magical component, the halo inductor, they never would. so i apologize if i ever misled anyone with my enthusiasm & very vocal support for a pedal that only i possessed, thinking the released version to be the same; they are ENTIRELY different. DAMN, i was lucky, because i seriously considered trading mine for the released red wah with the added bass resonance (a really great idea, as the pedal's bass is pretty pronounced, tho' not really needed on mine, with the halo, as it added some of the mids back in, & to INCREDIBLY rich effect). & thank god geoffrey steered me away from doing so! if i HAD to compare my wof to another wah, it'd be either the one bonamassa had dunlop make for him (hb's on my lp/sg ALSO being a motivation), or scotty smith's old pro analog "supa quack," both very wide & throaty wahs that KILL with humbuckers. but my teese STILL reigns...

  • @777jordan
    @777jordan 14 років тому

    RMC FTW!

  • @5h1b1m4n
    @5h1b1m4n 14 років тому +2

    lol you need to start telling us what the knobs say at least. some of these demos u just spin knobs and never show us the full potential of the pedal.

  • @ErasmusNumber1
    @ErasmusNumber1 14 років тому

    seems like you have to push that red sucker to the floor to make it happen!

  • @popomczowzow
    @popomczowzow 14 років тому

    expensive =\= better
    RMC was way to subtle. I'd take that sexy crybaby sound over it any day.
    I'd say my top favorite wahs are as follows:
    Fulltone Clyde Deluxe> Jimi Hendrix Crybaby > Vox V487> Standard Crybaby

  • @Nimrod9458
    @Nimrod9458 13 років тому

    It sounds like the RMS doesn't have a rich and complete sweep...

  • @83cajht
    @83cajht 14 років тому

    @liamguitar09 yeah ....you go take that to the store and smash in there face, it sounds Brokken mine does that 2 not the buzzing part, but it is 4 years so.... no warrenty, but hey notthing last 4ever. mb try it on a nother amp tjek cabels and so on b4 you start smashing faces.....

  • @guitarstella1
    @guitarstella1 6 років тому +1

    I think the crybaby is ruining the sound of rmc, after all its modelled on the colour sound wah which is known for its fantastic sound and should wipe the floor with the crybaby which is good but not the same

  • @henkkman
    @henkkman 14 років тому +1

    Someone's gonna sell a lot of crybabys :))

  • @otusqueaky
    @otusqueaky 14 років тому

    Man, that crybaby sounds way better

  • @guitarvibe75
    @guitarvibe75 14 років тому

    @guitarvibe75 damn i missed

  • @tenzel1231
    @tenzel1231 11 років тому

    You know what? After I wrote that I reread his comment and felt stupid, Sorry about that Tyler! lol

  • @shanehanson8922
    @shanehanson8922 6 років тому

    Jack Black twisting the knobbys

  • @ciclosonico
    @ciclosonico 14 років тому

    CryBaby all the way!!!

  • @fergambini
    @fergambini 14 років тому

    nice boots

  • @muggo131
    @muggo131 14 років тому

    the rmc sounds average coz the dunlop is not true bypass and sucks all the tone but the rmc is so the cry baby sounds fine

  • @jasonsheppard7428
    @jasonsheppard7428 6 років тому

    The Dunlop sounds better to me. (Checks out the window to make sure the Teese cult aren't outside with pitchforks and torches (and loads of disposable income)).

  • @myfuckinaccount
    @myfuckinaccount 12 років тому

    nice shoes

  • @zeal6742
    @zeal6742 12 років тому +1

    I prefer the Cry Baby.
    The RMC sounds more like a Phaser than a Wah

  • @agastyeet8362
    @agastyeet8362 12 років тому

    Jack Black, Is that you

  • @addy121
    @addy121 13 років тому

    Yes... Back in the shire.. Bahaha GMD.

  • @nymetsrock
    @nymetsrock 13 років тому

    @thesjkexperience dirt-->wah, all day every day

  • @reverb2020x
    @reverb2020x 11 років тому

    i think the classic sounds better.

  • @PureDevilAllenAngel
    @PureDevilAllenAngel 12 років тому

    @5h1b1m4n his vids are all about entertainment dude

  • @guitarjhoel
    @guitarjhoel 9 років тому

    the snake shoes jajaja lol

  • @diegopestanaguitarrista7891
    @diegopestanaguitarrista7891 3 роки тому

    Cry baby is the best Voice (wah)

  • @Livengoodproject
    @Livengoodproject 11 років тому

    I hear the difference, but does it really matter? If you want a wah, you can't get any more 'realistic' than a cry baby.
    I guess if you want something 'custom' with a 'name' eclectronic tweaker guy. go for it.
    But, who is really going to say, 'That wah sound was UNREAL". It's a wah, nothing more or less. Very basic
    My 2 cents worth.

  • @fuzzfreak1967
    @fuzzfreak1967 14 років тому

    I have the W.O.F. wah and do not like it, it has no squeal; chirp; cry; it just wah's

  • @takkieaaa
    @takkieaaa 12 років тому

    I have it too but i don't like it it have a very ugly sweep

  • @6Expendable6Youth6
    @6Expendable6Youth6 13 років тому

    get youself a Gibson Jack!

  • @ropinheiro19
    @ropinheiro19 10 років тому +1

    CRY BABY RULES!!

  • @Kapulaites
    @Kapulaites 14 років тому

    Crybaby sounded nicer to me.

  • @iescoja
    @iescoja 13 років тому

    DEF JACK BLACK

  • @kevinjoe3578
    @kevinjoe3578 12 років тому

    i go for the cry baby!!! :)

  • @math101a
    @math101a 14 років тому

    Cry Baby! It just sounds much more like a wah should sound

  • @bbnatedogg
    @bbnatedogg 13 років тому

    u know what learnt from dis vid? DAT GMD CAN'T SET UP A TEESE WOF FO JACK SHIZNIT!!!!!!!!!

  • @ThomDumdust
    @ThomDumdust 13 років тому

    Crybaby, hands down.

  • @stephensticht
    @stephensticht 13 років тому

    he IS jack black
    he hasn't work in a while

  • @GuitarLessonSarasota
    @GuitarLessonSarasota 14 років тому

    cany beat that good old crybaby

  • @Demmiian
    @Demmiian 13 років тому

    Viva Cry Baby!

  • @i.shadrin
    @i.shadrin 10 років тому +2

    cry baby

  • @bbnatedogg
    @bbnatedogg 13 років тому

    XD

  • @TrippleThreat15
    @TrippleThreat15 14 років тому

    1st 2 comment!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @takkieaaa
    @takkieaaa 12 років тому +1

    not true.. i'm sorry...
    i have the cry baby zw 45 and clean it's fucking ugly

  • @guitarvibe75
    @guitarvibe75 14 років тому

    damn, im first

  • @BLDbassist
    @BLDbassist 13 років тому

    cry baby. :D

  • @Kapulaites
    @Kapulaites 14 років тому

    Crybaby sounded nicer to me.