Is there a difference between theory and speculation? Leave your thoughts in the comments. Watch Lisa debate truth, theory and ultimate reality with Tim Maudlin, Abby Innes and Bernard Carr: iai.tv/video/truth-theory-and-ultimate-reality?UA-cam&
We humans need to immortal to machines to access 5 d 🌏live ASI forever live thinking 💭 hope u got it think 4 dimension is black hole we humans immortal to access 5 dimensionFGAP and FGAR mandatory
1. Science is a method of deriving objective measurements as objectively as possible. I didnt think the method was to interpret these measurements with objectivity as well, seems like a grain of fantasy, intuition, subjectivity, that instantly gets marked as speculation as if speculation then is a negative. 2. Maybe start to interpret these measurements with the reality we observe, and that we observe that everything we have observed, observes. The box is everything, how can you figure out the whole fundamental anything with the objective x, interpreted and cross referenced with objective x to conclude with x, when objectivity is a part of reality, not the whole reality. Its so on the nose its starting to become nonsensical when all the silos are pointing in the same direction and yet, stagnated, arguing where it is and desperately trying to distance itself from anything that has to do with the other side of the coin.
@@BlumpkinSpice420 it could be she isn’t annoyed at all. But even if she is, I’ve been annoyed and stressed everyday for the past three months, and I’m sure it’s bled over into the rest of my life
@Doc7734, if she is, that's not a problem. She's not an elected official. She's not on our time or our dime. She's 100% a private citizen and owes the public nothing.
@@nolanpenn8428 This interviewer was asking the most trite, click-bait questions. This demonstrates that he wasn't serious or prepared to do this interview.
@@adamwho9801The interviewer was asking the key question that every string theorist should answer: What is the point of theoretical hypotheses that nobody can test?
Title is pretty misleading...like describing how a system works is not only the job of physics, but chemistry, biology, mathematics, systematic psychology all play a part in it.. that is how we describe how systems within systems within systems actually work..
Hi. Randall's phrase which spoke about something being "completely within the context of the scientific method" caught my ear. It makes me think about how we want our science to be complete and comprehensive, and how our science and the scientific method do their jobs to cover such a wide context so that we can have even more and more to talk about as time progresses. Method itself strives for completion, to get a result and to explain how it got there. Thanks for your interview! 😊
Failing to connect math with physical reality has nothing to do with uncertainty. Physics is different than math because it requires experimental confirmation. Physicists without experimental evidence are doing math, not physics.
Neil deGrasse Tyson says there are theories like General & Special Relativity which are well-attested to & there are hypotheses, which are falsifiable speculative statements about the nature of the universe & its laws that haven't been sufficiently tested to determine whether they're theories: not enough of their predictions have been shown accurate/true.
@ take a look at her whole career and what does it add up to? and how much has she been paid? did you listen to how she speaks? It’s a little bit like Kamala Harris. What is she respected for?
I cannot hear the intro. Is it How the LIght Gets In? Is that some sort of British chat show? Podcast? Who is the interviewer. It is unclear from the (voluminous) description who what where when why this interview exists.
I'm guessing - based on her clothes being the same - that this interview happened before the 'Truth, theory and ultimate reality' debate (featuring a clash with Tim Maudlin, which is on UA-cam), which took place at the HowTheLightGetsIn festival (hosted by the Institute of Arts and Ideas) in Hay-on-Wye, Wales in May of 2024. The interviewer would have been one of the several young people the IAI employs, probably because they're inexpensive.
I am not a theorist. On the other hand I do have a passion for science, the scientific method and learning about the physical world around me, along with the physiology and the psychology within. Though I am not a theorist my education is sufficient that I may form hypotheses based upon the information I've gathered from reliable sources. I estimate that based upon maths prediction 96% of the universe as yet undiscovered there is room for supposition and hypotheses as to the meaning of this.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
To say that we may never find dark matter because of it's properties leaves it as no more than a "fudge factor". You can't prove it exists and you can't prove it does not exist. This is the problem with physics today...too many theories that seem to lead nowhere. Since we still don't have a quantum explanation for gravity, I suspect some of the mysteries like dark matter and dark energy may be explained when that riddle is solved. Then we have the question of the measurement problem. I would stop looking at unverifiable abstractions and concentrate on quantum theory and gravity.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Lisa Randall's statements reveal a troubling dissonance between her role as a prominent physicist and her understanding of the broader implications of scientific inquiry. Her dismissal of the public's "big questions," combined with an uncritical acceptance of theoretical constructs like dark matter and dark energy, points to a significant blind spot in her approach. While she acknowledges the inherent uncertainty within scientific exploration, she simultaneously rebuffs inquiries that fall outside the conventionally accepted scientific framework. This creates a paradox where science claims dominion over knowledge while admitting its limitations and actively resisting alternative modes of exploration. Her defense of dark matter and dark energy, without engaging with the profound philosophical questions they raise, further underscores this intellectual myopia. She fails to address the epistemological challenges inherent in inferring existence based solely on gravitational effects and neglects to consider alternative explanations that might challenge the current paradigm. This, along with her dismissive attitude towards public engagement with fundamental questions, is simply unacceptable for a tenured professor, especially in a field as deeply intertwined with philosophical inquiry as theoretical physics. Her position not only stifles the spirit of open exploration but also undermines the public's trust in the scientific process by presenting a narrow and potentially misleading view of the universe. Such a lack of critical self-reflection and philosophical awareness is unbecoming of someone entrusted with shaping the next generation of scientific thinkers and informing public understanding of the cosmos
"We feel that even if all possible scientific questions be answered, the problems of life have still not been touched at all.“ Wittgenstein I'd like to know when the interview was done because recent results challenge the dark matter and energy hypothesis. The problem is that if both do exist then the Standard Model, which we are repeatedly told is the most verified scientific model ever created, cannot explain 90+% of the universe.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Most of the people commenting on this totally uncontroversial interview appear to be paranoid conspiracy theorists. Randall and the interviewer must both be having a right old chuckle
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@@paulmitchell2916 Find a good video about the Lense Thirring effect as this is a relativistic effect formed by supermassive black holes rotating at the speed of light. Inertial reference frames are being dragged around causing stars in a galaxy to rotate faster than in Newtonian dynamics -- dark matter. The big bang is an infinite negative curvature singularity or a white hole -- divergent, repulsive. A white hole repels matter just like the big bang or an explosion. Gaussian negative curvature is defined using two dual points -- pringle space. Riemann geometry or curvature, gravitation is dual hence singularities must be dual. The universe should be called the dual-verse as it is dual.
@@hyperduality2838 the phrase "save us" directs my thought to the flourishing or suffering of the generations to follow. Current science and technology are more than adequate.. effort in those directions is pursued mostly for ego magnification or worse, military power. What's needed now is progress in understanding the human world. Ethics, social psychology, normative economics and all of the arts. Not sure what your level of competence is in actual science, but from the sound of what you say maybe a good book would be "Visual Differential Geometry" by Tristan Needham.. I can mostly understand it, but I have to work pretty hard. Videos about such topics give only a delusion of understanding..
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@@alex79suited Energy is duality! Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy. Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy is dual. If energy is being conserved then duality is being conserved -- the 5th law of thermodynamics! Everything in physics is made from energy or duality. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
@hyperduality2838 except in an equivalent environment such as the vacuum space. whereas charge is the energy, and once objects lose the ability to carry charge. Once the ability is lost, those objects become just a product of the environment. Charge less mass less objects to the environment, thus becoming dark matter. Peace ✌️ 😎.
What right does this podcast editor have to exclude parts of my statement and research question/hypothesis and that is our s u n contributes 172.8 billion tons of matter into space and the Universe each day..., to say nothing of dark matter and dark energy contributions as well. How do these impact, contributing to the question of an expansion of the universe? This is not a question that should be taken lightly (every pun intended) this is a valid research question worthy of science.
Alive is dual to not alive -- Schrodinger's cat. Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Dr. Randall seems to dismiss the multiverse theory because it's untestable, and that is fair position to take. But on the other hand she admits that we may never know what dark matter is. Does that actually put dark matter on the same, perhaps unscientific, footing? Remember, the multiverse theory is not just speculation. It is a valid theory given the clear yet indirect (as is our data on dark matter) evidence we have for it. I would also like to say that in this video Dr. Randall gives the most clear and accurate statement of what science is and how it works I've heard in a long time. Thank you. I agree completely that the probabalistic nature of all we know should be taught in school, not just as one topic in one high school science class but continually from grade school.
She didn't dismiss the multiverse, she said it's hard to test. And she didn't say "we may never know what dark matter is". Rather she said, "What we don't know is the exact nature of dark matter....because it's literally very hard to see...it doesn't interact with light so far as we know." And that there are at least 8 evidences for it.
That is because the multiverse is not a theory. It can't be proven or disproven. It is a speculation, nothing more. Dark matter is something that can be quantified and effects observed, the theory does not presume to know what it is unlike the multiverse idea. I do see some similarities though because both do try to explain the absence of something expected. I mean they could say oh look dark matter is just a multiverse phenomenon, that is something different (btw I do think that is an actual idea now too).
There's no physical evidence for a multiverse. There is physical evidence for "dark matter" in its gravitational effect, although we don't know what it is.
@@ilikethisnamebetter Yes, there is no physical evidence for the multiverse, but there is still evidence. Many successful, well accepted physics theories provide evidence of a sort that something is going on. Yes, multiverse is speculation, but as Dr. Randall suggests, speculation is part of the game. My point is the notion that "dark matter" is matter at all is also speculation. If one is skeptical about the existence of multiverses then one should also be at least somewhat skeptical of the notion that there is matter that we cannot detect directly. I'm sensitive to this issue only because I engage with people who assert that the notion of the multiverse is mere speculation on the part of people who want to deny the existence of God. Yes, the multiverse is speculative, but so is dark matter. Both instances of speculation are within the true nature of good science.
@@CurtOntheRadio Randall was one of the physicits, who promoted eternal invlaltion since th 90s. The multiverse directly follows from that. So if she now says it´s not more than a speculation, this is a strong hint, that there indeed is not any provable evidence for any multiverse. DM is just a place holder for observations. For multiverses there aren´t any observations and never will be, it´s just a mathematical artifact.
Crisis, survival, advancement -- Bene Gesserit teaching Thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis -- the Hegelian dialectic. Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
The data pointing out dark matter should be made public and even presented here for example, we never know who might come up with a good explanation for it
With due respect, while ago Professor Randall suggested that the source of gravity comes from another world simply because it is a weaker force compared to other fundamental forces of nature. We need to be highly critical of this kind of scientific reasoning. At best, it is philosophy disguised in a scientific veneer.
I think she was pretty clear in this interview about the difference between theory vs. speculation and leaving space for academic freedom for scientists to discuss ideas. I mean, how serious of a forum was her statement made in? Ima guess it was not what intellectuals would call arduous and was likely much more similar to this interview. The IAI and most other UA-cam channels are pretty fluffy when it comes to science. It's sciencey entertainer.
If I said it was obvious gravity was a shadow effect of electromagnetism they would call me crazy, even though the math works but they can say it's from another universe.
@@paulthomas963 if it is allowed to speak about here, in responses, it is not true :D (I know alot of things that are true :D). For somone´s curiosity... would true structure of FinStrConst would be intersting to know?
I like how physicists are trying to find a model that explains reality, while totally ignoring consciousness, the only thing we know for sure exists, and for which materialism has no explanation what so ever.
That is because that is a different topic. They are trying to describe the physical universe. Setting up scientific test for something we can't even define is a whole different field.
@Diogenes76 Exactly. But many physicists don't describe it like you did. They just say that matter is fundamental, and consciousness is an epi-phenomenon, i.e. not relevant in a "theory of everything."
Rational, analytic (mathematics) is dual to empirical. synthetic (physics) -- Immanuel Kant. Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect. Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity. Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein. Dark energy is dual to dark matter. Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature. Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry. "Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@GilesMcRiker Exactly so. A bunch of knuckle draggers too stupid to realize how stupid they are, and therefore have the arrogance to think they know better than a theoretical physicist.
I was annoyed by the philosophical questions. I get the sense so was the prof. I now need to go listen to some geology.. which is far more relevant actually in general.
science education is not the problem but rather a socio/psychological one. this public malaise is a hangover from late 19th Century rationslism where uncertainty became associated with fear/anxiety, lack of power/agency and subjected humanity to the tyranny of hyper-normaiization ... uncertainy became hell on earth as non-conformity became a sin that induces an existential crisis, i.e. access to an earthy future. This tyranny and regime as science as certainty is intolerable to the human psyche and thus induces madness -- pathological radical skepticism, divinization, aliens, astrology, religious fundamentalism, nostalgia for "eden" /past that never was ....
Though I'd maybe even agree, specific context depeding, there is just something rather douchey about even phrasing it that way in the 1st place. Is it supposed to be some sort of woke/religitared shite in disguise ? I mean, what kind of salvation is my guy expecting exactly? 🤔
I agree that there's plenty of evidence for dark matter. However, dark energy is really not so well founded. It might be a mistake, it might be an illusion, or something like timescape model might be what's going on...
We humans need to immortal to machines to access 5 d 🌏live ASI forever live thinking 💭 hope u got it think 4 dimension is black hole we humans immortal to access 5 dimensionFGAP and FGAR mandatory
If you want answers to those questions, try meditating for a long time every day. I'm a psychological scientist. I love science because it assumes NOTHING!
A theory is established empirically. To say speculation is 'a theory' is to tell a boldfaced LIE to the public, who I assume wouldn't be interested in a bunch of maybe's. So this woman knows that and doesn't offend her money flow by a lie of omission.
They should just scrap the last generation of TP. Start again. They' e gone off track and gotten lost. When rational people rely on statistically probability for their results something is very wrong. And saying we don't undetstand statistical probability doesn't cut it.
Why bother? It is like comparing Leyton Orient to Liverpool. Professor Randall is a distinguished scientist. Ms. Hossenfelder has a lot of UA-cam followers because she appeals to conspiracy theorists, not scientists.
@@Dan-dg9pi She says that Science is Failing, Academia Sucks, Quantum Computing is Hype and there is somethng wrong with Particle Physics. Many people agree with her.
Sabiene is not especially critical of dark matter research as far as I know. I mean it is one of the most interesting phenomena out there right now. Who would not want to know more about it?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ This person appears to be a grifter………… Soft peddling corrupt behavior, or else she simply is not self-aware. In order of legitimacy there is speculation, followed by hypotheses, followed by theory. Modeling can be included with any of these.
She did a good job answering silly questions. He was asking the most basic, even childish, conceptual questions about science. You dont need a Harvard professor for that, you need google. He literally did not know what a theory was. wasting her time and mine.
Is there a difference between theory and speculation? Leave your thoughts in the comments.
Watch Lisa debate truth, theory and ultimate reality with Tim Maudlin, Abby Innes and Bernard Carr: iai.tv/video/truth-theory-and-ultimate-reality?UA-cam&
We humans need to immortal to machines to access 5 d 🌏live ASI forever live thinking 💭 hope u got it think 4 dimension is black hole we humans immortal to access 5 dimensionFGAP and FGAR mandatory
4:04 universe is one but dimension are Infinite that's y we say our creator is Infinite
How can we save the physicists who no longer can find the box they were trying to think out of?
This Comment Saved 5 People from Suicidal Thoughts...
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I imagine a box so limp and moist ….. well you had better not touch it
@@antoniopacelli It's gone up to 33 people as of now...
1. Science is a method of deriving objective measurements as objectively as possible. I didnt think the method was to interpret these measurements with objectivity as well, seems like a grain of fantasy, intuition, subjectivity, that instantly gets marked as speculation as if speculation then is a negative.
2. Maybe start to interpret these measurements with the reality we observe, and that we observe that everything we have observed, observes.
The box is everything, how can you figure out the whole fundamental anything with the objective x, interpreted and cross referenced with objective x to conclude with x, when objectivity is a part of reality, not the whole reality.
Its so on the nose its starting to become nonsensical when all the silos are pointing in the same direction and yet, stagnated, arguing where it is and desperately trying to distance itself from anything that has to do with the other side of the coin.
@@antoniopacelliwhy do u say that,? Is there some inside joke i don't get?
I just want to know why Dr Randall was so annoyed.
It´s her style, I guess.
Probably gets old entertaining people, just because you're in the field...
Or rubbed the wrong way (in that moment)!
No pun
@@BlumpkinSpice420 it could be she isn’t annoyed at all. But even if she is, I’ve been annoyed and stressed everyday for the past three months, and I’m sure it’s bled over into the rest of my life
She is annoyed her responses will be on UA-cam as long as it exists.
@Doc7734, if she is, that's not a problem. She's not an elected official. She's not on our time or our dime. She's 100% a private citizen and owes the public nothing.
She seems completely done with this idiotic interviewer.
she's treating him like an idiot... but is he? what did he do wrong?
@@nolanpenn8428 This interviewer was asking the most trite, click-bait questions. This demonstrates that he wasn't serious or prepared to do this interview.
@@adamwho9801 Seems that perhaps those are the answers that are needed to produce the new string and dark em physicists.
@@adamwho9801The interviewer was asking the key question that every string theorist should answer: What is the point of theoretical hypotheses that nobody can test?
Title is pretty misleading...like describing how a system works is not only the job of physics, but chemistry, biology, mathematics, systematic psychology all play a part in it.. that is how we describe how systems within systems within systems actually work..
it was click bait and I clicked, mostly 'cause of Dr. Randall.
Hi. Randall's phrase which spoke about something being "completely within the context of the scientific method" caught my ear. It makes me think about how we want our science to be complete and comprehensive, and how our science and the scientific method do their jobs to cover such a wide context so that we can have even more and more to talk about as time progresses. Method itself strives for completion, to get a result and to explain how it got there. Thanks for your interview! 😊
I like that she said “It's a question of what you choose to do on a daily basis too”.
Recommend the book "Lost in Math, How Beauty leads Physics astray, written by Sabine Hossenfelder.
@@davidnovakreadspoetry We don't all have the same options.
Failing to connect math with physical reality has nothing to do with uncertainty. Physics is different than math because it requires experimental confirmation. Physicists without experimental evidence are doing math, not physics.
Exactly !
Where can I get those chairs
A swap meet in a neighborhood liquidating 70's era furniture.
Neil deGrasse Tyson says there are theories like General & Special Relativity which are well-attested to & there are hypotheses, which are falsifiable speculative statements about the nature of the universe & its laws that haven't been sufficiently tested to determine whether they're theories: not enough of their predictions have been shown accurate/true.
Scientific funding can only be justified if scientific research offers predictive power. Without predictive power, no one can expect more funding.
Would be nice to see Lisa Randall in a talk with Sabine Hossenfelder about these topics.
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ I can’t imagine Hossenfelder having a conversation with this grifter
@99guspuppet8 i disagree. She is a respected physicist .
@ take a look at her whole career and what does it add up to? and how much has she been paid? did you listen to how she speaks? It’s a little bit like Kamala Harris. What is she respected for?
Or Roger Penrose
Sabine is going to hate her
I cannot hear the intro. Is it How the LIght Gets In? Is that some sort of British chat show? Podcast? Who is the interviewer. It is unclear from the (voluminous) description who what where when why this interview exists.
I'm guessing - based on her clothes being the same - that this interview happened before the 'Truth, theory and ultimate reality' debate (featuring a clash with Tim Maudlin, which is on UA-cam), which took place at the HowTheLightGetsIn festival (hosted by the Institute of Arts and Ideas) in Hay-on-Wye, Wales in May of 2024. The interviewer would have been one of the several young people the IAI employs, probably because they're inexpensive.
What a horrible repetitive load of questions about nothing
I am not a theorist. On the other hand I do have a passion for science, the scientific method and learning about the physical world around me, along with the physiology and the psychology within.
Though I am not a theorist my education is sufficient that I may form hypotheses based upon the information I've gathered from reliable sources.
I estimate that based upon maths prediction 96% of the universe as yet undiscovered there is room for supposition and hypotheses as to the meaning of this.
Where's the part about not saving us?
All the action is in the life sciences! 🧪 🔬
I would like to hear what Distler has to say.
at 03:00 why not just use the definition of what Theory is/means? instead they ironically speculate on what it means LOL
I live on Randall Ave., so I can totally relate to her.
I'd like to see if any of the top physicist can come up with at least 3 other gravitational wave detection methods.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@@hyperduality2838 Write a book.
To say that we may never find dark matter because of it's properties leaves it as no more than a "fudge factor". You can't prove it exists and you can't prove it does not exist. This is the problem with physics today...too many theories that seem to lead nowhere. Since we still don't have a quantum explanation for gravity, I suspect some of the mysteries like dark matter and dark energy may be explained when that riddle is solved. Then we have the question of the measurement problem. I would stop looking at unverifiable abstractions and concentrate on quantum theory and gravity.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
What if gravity is just the one big quanta of the universe?
Proposing untestable unfalsifiable theories won't save us indeed.
We do not know what is the ultimate nature of reality
Plato says, "Stay in your cave!"
@@rockets4kids But that is not what Humanity does We have come out of our cave even if it leads to our eventual destruction
@ Wooooooosh!
Postulating the existence of Dark Matter & Dark Energy reminds me of the Sydney Harris "... then a miracle occurs." cartoon.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Stick to your Jesus magic. Leave the science to the adults.
@@davidhoward4715 Jeez!
For me science has always been about explaining how things are rather than why.
@@robsmith1a :
Why always end with God....
We are species of light
Would you know if physics has already been unified?
Lisa Randall's statements reveal a troubling dissonance between her role as a prominent physicist and her understanding of the broader implications of scientific inquiry. Her dismissal of the public's "big questions," combined with an uncritical acceptance of theoretical constructs like dark matter and dark energy, points to a significant blind spot in her approach. While she acknowledges the inherent uncertainty within scientific exploration, she simultaneously rebuffs inquiries that fall outside the conventionally accepted scientific framework. This creates a paradox where science claims dominion over knowledge while admitting its limitations and actively resisting alternative modes of exploration. Her defense of dark matter and dark energy, without engaging with the profound philosophical questions they raise, further underscores this intellectual myopia. She fails to address the epistemological challenges inherent in inferring existence based solely on gravitational effects and neglects to consider alternative explanations that might challenge the current paradigm. This, along with her dismissive attitude towards public engagement with fundamental questions, is simply unacceptable for a tenured professor, especially in a field as deeply intertwined with philosophical inquiry as theoretical physics. Her position not only stifles the spirit of open exploration but also undermines the public's trust in the scientific process by presenting a narrow and potentially misleading view of the universe. Such a lack of critical self-reflection and philosophical awareness is unbecoming of someone entrusted with shaping the next generation of scientific thinkers and informing public understanding of the cosmos
Great comment. Thank you.
"We feel that even if all possible scientific questions be answered, the problems of life have still not been touched at all.“
Wittgenstein
I'd like to know when the interview was done because recent results challenge the dark matter and energy hypothesis. The problem is that if both do exist then the Standard Model, which we are repeatedly told is the most verified scientific model ever created, cannot explain 90+% of the universe.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
It's a woman not so!?
Most of the people commenting on this totally uncontroversial interview appear to be paranoid conspiracy theorists. Randall and the interviewer must both be having a right old chuckle
Your comment seems to be the conspiracy theory...
Did anyone ever think physics would save us? In my corner of the world that notion wouldn't even be a conversation starter.
Everything you have now is because of the physics of electricity.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@@hyperduality2838 I don't know what you're trying to say here.
@@paulmitchell2916 Find a good video about the Lense Thirring effect as this is a relativistic effect formed by supermassive black holes rotating at the speed of light. Inertial reference frames are being dragged around causing stars in a galaxy to rotate faster than in Newtonian dynamics -- dark matter.
The big bang is an infinite negative curvature singularity or a white hole -- divergent, repulsive.
A white hole repels matter just like the big bang or an explosion.
Gaussian negative curvature is defined using two dual points -- pringle space.
Riemann geometry or curvature, gravitation is dual hence singularities must be dual.
The universe should be called the dual-verse as it is dual.
@@hyperduality2838 the phrase "save us" directs my thought to the flourishing or suffering of the generations to follow. Current science and technology are more than adequate.. effort in those directions is pursued mostly for ego magnification or worse, military power. What's needed now is progress in understanding the human world. Ethics, social psychology, normative economics and all of the arts. Not sure what your level of competence is in actual science, but from the sound of what you say maybe a good book would be "Visual Differential Geometry" by Tristan Needham.. I can mostly understand it, but I have to work pretty hard. Videos about such topics give only a delusion of understanding..
[I guess the intern forgot to add the title] | [and the speaker name]
Please unsubscribe. Brain rot.
That was an interesting conversation. Thank you both. Looking forward to more. Peace ✌️ 😎.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@hyperduality2838 Dark matter is spent energy. Peace ✌️ 😎.
@@alex79suited Energy is duality!
Potential energy is dual to kinetic energy -- gravitational energy.
Electro is dual to magnetic -- electro-magnetic energy is dual.
If energy is being conserved then duality is being conserved -- the 5th law of thermodynamics!
Everything in physics is made from energy or duality.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
@hyperduality2838 except in an equivalent environment such as the vacuum space. whereas charge is the energy, and once objects lose the ability to carry charge. Once the ability is lost, those objects become just a product of the environment. Charge less mass less objects to the environment, thus becoming dark matter. Peace ✌️ 😎.
She seemed very annoyed with the interviewer.
What right does this podcast editor have to exclude parts of my statement and research question/hypothesis and that is our s u n contributes 172.8 billion tons of matter into space and the Universe each day..., to say nothing of dark matter and dark energy contributions as well. How do these impact, contributing to the question of an expansion of the universe? This is not a question that should be taken lightly (every pun intended) this is a valid research question worthy of science.
Physics is both, dead and alive, until we, actually, observe it ❤
@@Mario-s1c2o random comma placement
@otthoheldring lives on, even, in your, so-called, randomness.
Alive is dual to not alive -- Schrodinger's cat.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
@@otthoheldring no full stop
Beautiful, inside and out
Dr. Randall seems to dismiss the multiverse theory because it's untestable, and that is fair position to take. But on the other hand she admits that we may never know what dark matter is. Does that actually put dark matter on the same, perhaps unscientific, footing? Remember, the multiverse theory is not just speculation. It is a valid theory given the clear yet indirect (as is our data on dark matter) evidence we have for it.
I would also like to say that in this video Dr. Randall gives the most clear and accurate statement of what science is and how it works I've heard in a long time. Thank you. I agree completely that the probabalistic nature of all we know should be taught in school, not just as one topic in one high school science class but continually from grade school.
She didn't dismiss the multiverse, she said it's hard to test. And she didn't say "we may never know what dark matter is". Rather she said, "What we don't know is the exact nature of dark matter....because it's literally very hard to see...it doesn't interact with light so far as we know." And that there are at least 8 evidences for it.
That is because the multiverse is not a theory. It can't be proven or disproven. It is a speculation, nothing more. Dark matter is something that can be quantified and effects observed, the theory does not presume to know what it is unlike the multiverse idea. I do see some similarities though because both do try to explain the absence of something expected.
I mean they could say oh look dark matter is just a multiverse phenomenon, that is something different (btw I do think that is an actual idea now too).
There's no physical evidence for a multiverse. There is physical evidence for "dark matter" in its gravitational effect, although we don't know what it is.
@@ilikethisnamebetter Yes, there is no physical evidence for the multiverse, but there is still evidence. Many successful, well accepted physics theories provide evidence of a sort that something is going on. Yes, multiverse is speculation, but as Dr. Randall suggests, speculation is part of the game. My point is the notion that "dark matter" is matter at all is also speculation. If one is skeptical about the existence of multiverses then one should also be at least somewhat skeptical of the notion that there is matter that we cannot detect directly. I'm sensitive to this issue only because I engage with people who assert that the notion of the multiverse is mere speculation on the part of people who want to deny the existence of God. Yes, the multiverse is speculative, but so is dark matter. Both instances of speculation are within the true nature of good science.
@@CurtOntheRadio Randall was one of the physicits, who promoted eternal invlaltion since th 90s. The multiverse directly follows from that. So if she now says it´s not more than a speculation, this is a strong hint, that there indeed is not any provable evidence for any multiverse. DM is just a place holder for observations. For multiverses there aren´t any observations and never will be, it´s just a mathematical artifact.
theories develop out of speculation.
[Titolo con parola chiave] | [Relatore]
Word
[commento]
She appears not into the interview, surely a hangover.
The interviewer has no idea of what physica is. The crisis in fundamental physics is an epistimological failure.
He is a philosopher of science who has done influential work on the metaphysical foundations of physics and logic.
Crisis, survival, advancement -- Bene Gesserit teaching
Thesis, anti-thesis, synthesis -- the Hegelian dialectic.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
The data pointing out dark matter should be made public and even presented here for example, we never know who might come up with a good explanation for it
Homero did create more logic theories...
With due respect, while ago Professor Randall suggested that the source of gravity comes from another world simply because it is a weaker force compared to other fundamental forces of nature. We need to be highly critical of this kind of scientific reasoning. At best, it is philosophy disguised in a scientific veneer.
Also her connection of DM and the extinction of dinosaurs is more than speculative. Not clear for me how such smart people come up with this.
I think she was pretty clear in this interview about the difference between theory vs. speculation and leaving space for academic freedom for scientists to discuss ideas.
I mean, how serious of a forum was her statement made in? Ima guess it was not what intellectuals would call arduous and was likely much more similar to this interview.
The IAI and most other UA-cam channels are pretty fluffy when it comes to science.
It's sciencey entertainer.
If I said it was obvious gravity was a shadow effect of electromagnetism they would call me crazy, even though the math works but they can say it's from another universe.
@@paulthomas963 if it is allowed to speak about here, in responses, it is not true :D (I know alot of things that are true :D). For somone´s curiosity... would true structure of FinStrConst would be intersting to know?
@@paulthomas963 .... Truth is known. But not for public, Truman
😂physics will answer only body questions
Religion will answer only stupid questions. 🤣
I like how physicists are trying to find a model that explains reality, while totally ignoring consciousness, the only thing we know for sure exists, and for which materialism has no explanation what so ever.
That is because that is a different topic. They are trying to describe the physical universe. Setting up scientific test for something we can't even define is a whole different field.
This is philosophical blabla, not science. The so called hard problem of consciousness is the last bastion of anthropocentrism.
@Diogenes76 Exactly. But many physicists don't describe it like you did. They just say that matter is fundamental, and consciousness is an epi-phenomenon, i.e. not relevant in a "theory of everything."
@ Concsiusness is explainable as an emergent property of the human brain functions, nothing magic about.
Rational, analytic (mathematics) is dual to empirical. synthetic (physics) -- Immanuel Kant.
Dark matter is the dragging of inertial frames, a relativistic effect -- the Lense Thirring effect.
Dark energy is negative curvature or hyperbolic space -- repulsive gravity.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Singularities are dual -- positive curvature is dual to negative curvature.
Contravariant is dual to covariant -- vectors or a dual basis in Riemann geometry.
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Great
The comments here are a dumpster fire
Then let´s hear your wisdom.
@GilesMcRiker Exactly so. A bunch of knuckle draggers too stupid to realize how stupid they are, and therefore have the arrogance to think they know better than a theoretical physicist.
We should be worshipping the smart people instead of pointing out they aren't even following the scientific method. How dare we.
I was annoyed by the philosophical questions. I get the sense so was the prof. I now need to go listen to some geology.. which is far more relevant actually in general.
Boy she seems unhappy. Wonder why?
Star Trek the Next Generation lied to me.
"Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement...
Dream of californication..."
I am a ruler and son of light; master of the ceal, scribe and artisan. I am Proteus Augustus. I will take on any brain on the planet.
Good for you
@ what kind of answer is that. You insult me. Another loser. I intend to push string theory into the round file where it belongs. Such a con
Please tell me more about this round file. Do-Re-Mi, it is a string.
science education is not the problem but rather a socio/psychological one. this public malaise is a hangover from late 19th Century rationslism where uncertainty became associated with fear/anxiety, lack of power/agency and subjected humanity to the tyranny of hyper-normaiization ... uncertainy became hell on earth as non-conformity became a sin that induces an existential crisis, i.e. access to an earthy future. This tyranny and regime as science as certainty is intolerable to the human psyche and thus induces madness -- pathological radical skepticism, divinization, aliens, astrology, religious fundamentalism, nostalgia for "eden" /past that never was ....
Dumb questions....😢
You are proof of evolution.
Very likely and truth... There is a big gap 😘
Though I'd maybe even agree, specific context depeding, there is just something rather douchey about even phrasing it that way in the 1st place. Is it supposed to be some sort of woke/religitared shite in disguise ? I mean, what kind of salvation is my guy expecting exactly? 🤔
Intimidating. I shall buy her book.
Gosh you're beautiful !
I AM Balungi Francis (Author) I WAS HERE today 1/31/2025
I agree that there's plenty of evidence for dark matter. However, dark energy is really not so well founded. It might be a mistake, it might be an illusion, or something like timescape model might be what's going on...
Rubbish. A basic understanding of physics will provide the *_overwhelming_* evidence for dark energy..
@davidhoward4715 Basic understanding... 🤣🤣
Do you even know what is the timescape model?
We humans need to immortal to machines to access 5 d 🌏live ASI forever live thinking 💭 hope u got it think 4 dimension is black hole we humans immortal to access 5 dimensionFGAP and FGAR mandatory
Dark energy has been measured? Where are all the noble prizes😂😂😂
The effects are very well measured.
@@Diogenes76 Timescape?
@ Yes, I find that one very interesting. Would be hard as hell to test.
They did give out a Nobel Prize for "dark energy" by which they mean the type A1 supernova data. Which they later discovered was flawed.
@ Indeed!😆
If you want answers to those questions, try meditating for a long time every day. I'm a psychological scientist. I love science because it assumes NOTHING!
A theory is established empirically. To say speculation is 'a theory' is to tell a boldfaced LIE to the public, who I assume wouldn't be interested in a bunch of maybe's. So this woman knows that and doesn't offend her money flow by a lie of omission.
Stick to your Jesus magic. Leave the science to the sane adults.
@@davidhoward4715 You know any?
Why physics won't save us.... Dark matter - Dark Energy exist? So what... Explain the physics of something practical, please.
They should just scrap the last generation of TP. Start again. They' e gone off track and gotten lost.
When rational people rely on statistically probability for their results something is very wrong. And saying we don't undetstand statistical probability doesn't cut it.
Lisa Randall. Beauty with brain
She is in a good shape, despite her age!
Creepy...
Ask Sabine Hossenfelder.
Why bother? It is like comparing Leyton Orient to Liverpool. Professor Randall is a distinguished scientist. Ms. Hossenfelder has a lot of UA-cam followers because she appeals to conspiracy theorists, not scientists.
@@Dan-dg9pi She says that Science is Failing, Academia Sucks, Quantum Computing is Hype and there is somethng wrong with Particle Physics. Many people agree with her.
@@mrtienphysics666 She also points out the fallacy of "Many people agree with her." Anyway, are even two voices too many?
Sabiene is not especially critical of dark matter research as far as I know. I mean it is one of the most interesting phenomena out there right now. Who would not want to know more about it?
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ This person appears to be a grifter………… Soft peddling corrupt behavior, or else she simply is not self-aware. In order of legitimacy there is speculation, followed by hypotheses, followed by theory. Modeling can be included with any of these.
She’s a real bright star isn’t she 🤦♂️ like watching paint called Karen dry
This lady is immature
She did a good job answering silly questions. He was asking the most basic, even childish, conceptual questions about science. You dont need a Harvard professor for that, you need google. He literally did not know what a theory was. wasting her time and mine.
Theoretical physicists are becoming increasing irrelevant with each passing day.