New Economic World Order? Industrial Policies & De-Risking From China | When Titans Clash 3 - Part 2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 827

  • @jjbully
    @jjbully Рік тому +152

    What China is doing to moving up the value chain and produce higher value added stuff, not de-risking. US and Europe are always making up stories that China is doing the same thing they do, e.g. debt-trap and colonialism and genocide

    • @tjm0112
      @tjm0112 Рік тому +3

      😂😂😂😂

    • @旅人途见
      @旅人途见 Рік тому

      @@polupopus5836Singapore is a Western colony

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому +19

      China does not use the word 'de-risking', they use the word 'self-reliance (自力更生)', which basically is the same thing: Reducing your international exposure by producing everything at home.

    • @jjbully
      @jjbully Рік тому +5

      @@polupopus5836 they didn’t create the content, they interviewed Americans

    • @walking_luggage8105
      @walking_luggage8105 Рік тому

      @@pjacobsen1000 China has to become self reliant because the west can't be trusted. A case in point, look at how the west tried to cast Huawei out of the open market to protect the western tech companies. It is actually good the Chinese government understands the western mentality and saw this coming years ago and so they are prepared for such a day.

  • @jvs333
    @jvs333 Рік тому +95

    What this documentary series fully displays is how brilliantly China approaches everything from a large grand overview of things, while the U.S. does things in a fragmented private for profit interests. There is a master planning long overview by China. The U.S. does things in an reactionary fragmented way, and reacts by trade wars, sanctions, attempting to create conflicts rather than actually developing a long term grand national/industrial plan to develop a future framework to be a legitimate global competitor. You can call the U.S. “Tanya Harding” as it resorts to trying to knee-cap its competitors to keep them from advancing rather than developing a serious competitive agenda. The U.S. military seems to be its only tool, when a hammer sees everything as a nail

    • @exohumer3486
      @exohumer3486 Рік тому +5

      This may be true, but why does it work in China and hasn't worked e.g. in Russia ? They also had a planned economy.

    • @LetsGoUSA
      @LetsGoUSA Рік тому +1

      @@exohumer3486 Why would you interject a whole different country in to the conversation? Russia is totally different from China obviously. ua-cam.com/video/5VHMNbA8MsE/v-deo.htmlsi=r5nf0O1CcuejfLau

    • @blackknight4996
      @blackknight4996 Рік тому +18

      @@exohumer3486
      You can plan for your whole life. But when you fail in execution (like India, no planning and zero execution) it's just a paperwork.

    • @patrickdgarez86
      @patrickdgarez86 Рік тому +6

      Your review of the situation makes China out to be a quiet little angel sitting in its own little corner minding its own business, while stoically just trying to make something of itself. That the big bad west has treated it so unfairly.
      For context, I spent 20 formative years in Singapore (as an expat. My father started his own business there). I first visited China in 1983 (My Father had an office in Beijing). Asia is burnt into my heart and I have great respect for China and its accomplishments and advances.
      With that said, it is much easier to achieve those results when you have a dictatorship that rules with an iron fist. Granted, that power has been used for capitalistic advancement and national improvement but to say that it was done without trade war tactics (currency manipulation, perpetual IP theft which let's face it is the only reason China has been able to jump so far forward so quickly, flooding western markets with artificially cheap goods etc) is disingenuous, at best.
      Of course, the US's economic focus is on fragmented private for-profit interests. Unlike China, our businesses aren't state owned.
      If Xi stopped trying to threaten Taiwan, took a neutral position on Russia and NK (rather than openly supporting them), behaved like a proper trading partner that didn't create new laws that jail foreign business people for fictitious spying accusations, then Xi wouldn't have to travel the the US to beg for companies to "come back".
      While I completely agree that the US has made countless mistakes (not investing in infrastructure, education, etc), I see China as the "Tanya Harding". It is the one that is falling on its own sword thanks to its horrendous trade policies.
      This could be an hour long conversation but the best way that I can sum it up is that the US and Europe are almost never on the same page when it comes to international trade and yet both continents are united in their condemnation of how China conducts business, globally. Where there is smoke there is usually fire.
      Are you suggesting that they shouldn't protect their economies and that Chinese goods have been systematically refused in these markets? A huge percentage of our consumer goods, in the US, are made in China. I am quite content with this fact but how much more open trading borders do you want?
      Some self reflection, on the part of China, might be in order, especially given that it is guilty of the same kind of protectionist policies that it is accusing the west of implementing. After all, while Chinese companies can open business entities in the US, independently, in order for a US company to set up shop in China, it must do so under a joint venture partnership with a Chinese company.

    • @jvs333
      @jvs333 Рік тому

      @@patrickdgarez86 to start with all your criticism and accusations of China sound like they were copied and pasted from the U.S. government/media propaganda and lies.
      After China being exploited by the U.S. in the late 80s and 90s and even into the 2000s. Xi came and "played" the US capitalist game and was smarter at it. Beating the U.S. at their own game of geo-economics/geo-commerce/geo-trade. I find it laughable that you think it is China doing the "Tanya Harding" tactics. Who's been the one using sanctions? Trade wars? Isolation attempts? Using dirty tactics to undermine by threatening/bullying nations to not stray from U.S. anti-China policies? Who's been militarizing encirclements of China? Is China arming Puerto Rico? Cuba? Sending warships off the coast of the U.S.? Etc...
      Seems your so full of brainwashed US anti-China crapola you've lost all sense of reasoning or intelligence.
      Laughable that you mention global community behavior😂😂have you heard of Vietnam? Cambodia? Central America? South America? Middle East? Iraq? Iran? Africa? Syria? Libya? Somalia? Myanmar? Pakistan? Afghanistan? Tienamen Square? Hong Kong? Taiwan? And the dozens of US orchestrated/funded coups/assasinations? The various terrorists groups funded and armed by the U.S.? Or all the times the U.S. has vetoed atrocities that serve their CIA interests.
      As for the economics between the U.S. and China. Let's remember it was the U.S. who wanted to exploit the cheap labor and resources of China starting in the late 1980s. The entire U.S. economy was built on China (retail, industrial parts, freight, shipping, trucking, rail, online shopping, UPS, FedEx, and all the trades and industries that depend on those things.
      There'd be no Walmart, Amazon, Home Depot and all the other retailers and the industries they depend on to make their businesses succeed.
      As for Taiwan. Taiwan is a province of China under the ONE CHINA policy that the US and the ENTIRE WORLD has signed on to and agreed in including the UN. it is the US that is instigating another US "proxy war" (japan, south korea, Philippines, australia and now NATO.
      you seem either ignorant of all the facts and realities in all this or just willfully dishonest to feed your bias.
      China has built itself up by honest hard work of the Chinese people and a smart government.
      the US bs that China has had to resort to theft from the is laughable propaganda to comfort the lagging US ego. yeah China stole 5 and 6G from the US (which doesnt have it) or hypersonic Ai missiles (US doesn't have), Ai statellite technology (US doesn't have), HSR systems (US doesnt have), highly advanced Ai space station (US doesnt have),
      the most advanced infrastructure (US doesnt have), the world's largest EV, robotics, IT, Ai manufacturer, the fastest super computers in the world, 350 million graduate degree youths with skills, abilities and talents needed for the 21st century tech globalized world (oh yeah the US only has 330 million people and half of them believe trump won, etc...
      yeah keep telling yourself whatever falsehoods and bs you need to comfort your alt-reality.
      the REALITY is the US is in decline (thanks to a corrupt government and an ignorant delusional citizenry),
      CHINA, RUSSIA, BRICS are and will be the coming future.
      reality must be a B**ch when it isnt the one you think it is 😂😂😂😂

  • @hanfucolorful9656
    @hanfucolorful9656 Рік тому +1

    3:45 WOW!! that guy (at very right) standing on the edge of the roof

  • @MILABRRA
    @MILABRRA Рік тому +7

    GREAT VIDEO CNA THANKS FOR THIS SEREIS

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 11 місяців тому +23

    FoxConn escapes from the INDIAN TRAP FAST just in time before the Indian Trap closes in ..

    • @Muneerkhan-y3l
      @Muneerkhan-y3l 7 місяців тому +3

      Fake india has many semiconductor plant and mostly coming soon india setup 20 billion worth of semiconductor plant in india 😅 😅 go and read some than comment

    • @AriSuwitno-d8u
      @AriSuwitno-d8u 4 місяці тому

      A cow country can't possibly be like high-tech China, so don't dream😂😂😂😂

    • @1pasupaty
      @1pasupaty 2 місяці тому

      Foxconn has completed investing thoroughly in Bengaluru.i dnt care uf we don't buy china's 4nm chip.ill buy my nations 10nm chip.its enough for me.

  • @patrickdgarez86
    @patrickdgarez86 Рік тому +4

    Excellent doc. Thank you to the CNA team.

  • @marktrinidad7650
    @marktrinidad7650 Рік тому +44

    The Americans seems it wants to derisk not just in China but the entire world. Glad they are making the first steps in derisking their trade from Asia.

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha Рік тому +3

      its de-risking is centered away from our country not the entire world

    • @benzpinto
      @benzpinto Рік тому +13

      it will be hard for america to do so because labor in america is not cheap. and whatever they produce will not be competative in terms of pricing. perhaps if they only serve their own market and not export, it wil be ok. 😂

    • @lkchoh1454
      @lkchoh1454 Рік тому +8

      Can American/Indian does the same thing like working in 996 system, i.e working 6 days from 9am to 9pm? Especially India as developing country, can they work 8hrs per day in 3 rotation shift for 6 days in a week? If can't how to compete, this concerns working time, don't count skill and innovation.

    • @Ryan-he2qz
      @Ryan-he2qz Рік тому +1

      @@leexinghayou got the point girl

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Рік тому +11

      😂What actually happening is the "Global South" de-risking from G7 . USD.

  • @movingwind89
    @movingwind89 Рік тому +7

    very good episode from different angles from the world

    • @levelazn
      @levelazn 6 місяців тому

      to beat china, u.s has become china lol

  • @stevenliew2507
    @stevenliew2507 Рік тому +61

    This Video is very much anti-China, pro-US and pro-India.
    Apple in India was a poor investment in India and same like many so many others.
    India Government has a very " compulsive " robbery tendency.
    This video also forgotten about ASEAN which will not de-couple in manufacturing or for that matter trade.
    Those who have not been following global geo-political narratives will definitely be hood winked by this video.

    • @Show_what_I_Love
      @Show_what_I_Love Рік тому

      Pro India? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 what a joker u are. And yeah another bad investment from Boeing yesterday in india. Biggest Boeing facility after US is now in india. Now plan a funeral for ur ego.😂😂😂

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Рік тому +7

      😂What actually happening is the "Global South" de-risking from G7 . USD.

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Рік тому +5

      Gxxg1e "The US-funded ‘think tank’ pushing Australia towards war
      By Bruce Haigh - an Australian political commentator and former diplomat.
      Jan 27, 2022"
      Most CNA "expert" are from AUS think tank ...now you know why..

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Рік тому +8

      The US Foreign Policy to keep Asia poor and divided as stated in a top-secret U.S. Foreign Policy document written 76 years ago is still in force.
      February 24, 1948, Declassified U.S. Foreign Policy:
      Furthermore, we have about 50% of the world’s wealth but only 6.3% of its population. This disparity is particularly great as between ourselves and the peoples of Asia. In this situation, we cannot fail to be the object of envy and resentment. Our real task in the coming period is to devise a pattern of relationships which will permit us to maintain this position of disparity without positive detriment to our national security. ... that Japan and the Philippines will be found to be the corner-stones of such a Pacific security system and that if we can contrive to retain effective control over these areas there can be no serious threat to our security from the East within our time.
      Taiwan was added to the Pacific security system after Chiang's army retreated to the island of Taiwan in 1949. South Korea was added after the Korean War in 1953. The attempt with Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia was abandoned in 1975.

    • @CJ-re7bx
      @CJ-re7bx Рік тому

      People will also be hoodwinked by your obviously Chinese or Russian state sponsored comment.

  • @arbaz79
    @arbaz79 Рік тому +3

    Thank you for this two-part amazing documentary series❤.Keep it up 👍

  • @CautionCU
    @CautionCU Рік тому +38

    Good luck to everyone and hoping for a peaceful rest of the century

    • @Jay-v1r2n
      @Jay-v1r2n Рік тому

      Would be nice, but it'll take more than that. War is not organic, never has in all of modern history. Controllers are preparing the globe for the 3rd world war. After will be hyper-globalism, i.e global government, which is the entire point. I've been studying this for over 20 years. We've been "warned" about it for 200 years.

    • @jackytang3683
      @jackytang3683 Рік тому

      World war three is inevitable

  • @pjacobsen1000
    @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому +12

    Another excellent episode in this series. Sober, professional journalism!

  • @daisyxfaith
    @daisyxfaith 3 місяці тому

    This looks SO good, definitely going to try it!

  • @Utoko
    @Utoko 4 місяці тому +1

    The question is if economic de-risking doesn't increase the risk of a big conflict because countries think they can handle it.

  • @urbanstrencan
    @urbanstrencan 8 місяців тому +1

    What a great docu series great work

  • @MetaView7
    @MetaView7 11 місяців тому +4

    Now you know why the Southern border is porous - They need the workers to fill the factories.

  • @zhurongonmars6256
    @zhurongonmars6256 Рік тому +1

    This documentary is beautiful and came at the right time

  • @kshen7485
    @kshen7485 Рік тому +5

    Biggest game changer is government, instead of new chips.

  • @黄文飞-z3w
    @黄文飞-z3w Рік тому +14

    In certain sense, China Is derisking in some areas like Chips, only because we got no choice.
    As Huawei's Chairman once said, we will be very happy to continue to source our chips from USA if they can sell to us even we can manufacture by our own now.
    But at the same time, pls do remmember, China is largest or secend-largest trading parter to 90% of the countries. Deresking means reducing trade, it is not good for China.

    • @bin.s.s.
      @bin.s.s. Рік тому +3

      Largest of 140+ countries at present.

  • @pspsdan
    @pspsdan 9 місяців тому +2

    excellent reporting..

  • @louistan7560
    @louistan7560 Рік тому +23

    Every country outside the G7 and the EU is de-risking from the US$. This means no more investments in US Treasury Bills, property, and industries. And no more joint ventures.

    • @lowwastehighmelanin
      @lowwastehighmelanin Рік тому +2

      lol

    • @tjm0112
      @tjm0112 Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂😂

    • @yootoob-sd1cn
      @yootoob-sd1cn Рік тому

      How many CCP bots are there on this channel?

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому

      Few developing countries can afford to buy US Treasury Bonds. They need that money for their own development. The vast majority of foreign-owned Treasury Bonds are owned by rich economies, including China.

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому

      Through 2023, foreign countries have reduced about 2-3% of their holdings of US Treasury Bonds/Bills. Who have they sold them to? Mostly private investors, mostly in the US itself. America is now investing in itself instead of in other countries.

  • @hapah4894
    @hapah4894 9 місяців тому +1

    Deng Xiao Peng was the man who's responsible for starting China's economic growth.
    His famous for his "Crossing the river carefully by feeling the gravels on your feet" approach.

  • @Vin.1904
    @Vin.1904 8 місяців тому

    Great video👍👍

  • @sheik.2636
    @sheik.2636 11 місяців тому +5

    Hr hr 😂😂”we don’t play politics, we welcome everyone, from the east, west” . Politics is destroying the world indeed, and poorer countries are going to suffer most.

  • @blackknight4996
    @blackknight4996 Рік тому +40

    Using TSMC as an example is very timely, as TSMC is failing in Arizona right in front of our eyes.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 Рік тому +1

      Sadly it won’t give the entitled and arrogant US people a wake up call.

    • @davidrichards1741
      @davidrichards1741 Рік тому

      No, the US tricked TSMC by reneging on the billions of subsidies it promised TSMC to build in the unprofitable uncompetitive inhospitable US, and instead gave all that money to "US" chip firms. They also helped US firms raid TSMC of its thousands of Taiwanese staff that TSMC brought from Taiwan because US engineers were very unsatisfactory and poorly trained compared to all East Asian engineers, as everyone knows is the case today. It was the US gov't plan all along in order to boost US chipmakers via dirty pool against TSMC. The dumb Taiwan DPP Green govt and TSMC Chair fell for it. TSMC should abandon the dishonorable US and return to China where business is better and much more honorably conducted. I know from firsthand experience in the industry on both sides of the ocean.

    • @brotherbig4651
      @brotherbig4651 Рік тому

      @@davidrichards1741 Lol, in your dream. Leader of TSMC does not fall for your CCP propaganda. They know they have no bargaining power when CCP controls them.

    • @blackknight4996
      @blackknight4996 Рік тому +12

      @@davidrichards1741
      Agree with you. But was it "tricked" or "coerced" ? Did Morris Chang have a choice? Probably not...

    • @awesome8975
      @awesome8975 11 місяців тому +10

      And apple failing in India😁😁

  • @desi4lyfe379
    @desi4lyfe379 Рік тому +9

    China mastered reverse engineering & acquired western technologies world wide during 2008 recession. Gradually, China built their own supply chains & took over manufacturing worldwide. The approach to take over was very well calculated & it wont be easy for the entire world refraining from Chinese manufacturing for at least a decade or two. Is it feasible? Yes, but only unity among countries can accomplish that.

    • @jvs333
      @jvs333 Рік тому

      Your assuming China will be sitting idle for a decade or two.
      Also your Western (US) thinking that it had to be reverse engineering that gave China its rise is western (US) ego.
      It was the economy rise of the 90s of China’s manufacturing base and government policies of placing higher education that enabled China to rise technology with all the graduate degree young Chinese in fiends the government emphasized (engineering, technology, research, science) professions/careers the Chinese government needed for its future. This ego idiocy of the west that “oh they must have copied us” is laughable since all developing nations start with whatever came before it (the U.S. took from Europe in its development).
      China is the successful nation it is due to the Chinese people and the Chinese government.
      As for the future look at any nations society today: it’s infrastructure, the education and culture of it populace, it’s economic expenditures, it’s national values. This will explain the decline of todays U.S. and Europe.

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      It’s inevitable. It’s just that no one expected China to go backwards instead of becoming more civilized, they’ve decided to increase their harm to our environment from air, water, to unnecessary wastes.

  • @peterwong2962
    @peterwong2962 9 місяців тому +17

    Apple's India production faces quality issues, about 50% of iPhone housings produced rejected. Tata's Apple factory at Hosur, which make cases or housings for iPhones, had 50 per cent of its produced cases fail Apple's quality control check.17 Feb 2023

    • @Muneerkhan-y3l
      @Muneerkhan-y3l 7 місяців тому

      Fake news china is a leader of fake products india does not make copies😂

    • @AbrahamMani-sy7lx
      @AbrahamMani-sy7lx 7 місяців тому

      Peter wong stupid cheese liar

    • @mteevie1609
      @mteevie1609 5 місяців тому +1

      India was never great at manufacturing electronics. They are better at call center and non-electronic manufacturing like clothing, etc.

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому

      Seriously, it took China 40 years… it will take Mexico and India much less time… at least there will be less of a chance of them trying to bully everyone to give up their land and sea rights after they’ve become rich. China’s the kind of friend that will throw money on the floor at you after they’ve succeeded, not the kind of friend anyone wants.

    • @user-ki1bk5fi8b
      @user-ki1bk5fi8b 4 дні тому

      @@mteevie1609 lol are you kidding when you call chase customer service you can't even understand what they are saying their indian accent is so bad despite being doemesticated by the anglo for 400 years.

  • @danstenis660
    @danstenis660 Рік тому +8

    China started "de-risking" earlier than the Wests because it knows that the USA doesn't just de-risk, but also destroy through sanctions and prohibitive tariffs. China's de-risking doesn't involve hindering others, but involves self-reliance to prepare for the USA's sanctions and prohibitive tariffs. So don't try to make downgrade the USA's economic coercion and war as "de-risking," and don't try to upgrade's China's self-reliance as economic warfare. That is like the USA killing millions of people worldwide and continues to kill in the name of championing democracy and freedom and accusing China as a murderer when China doesn't go around the world invading or killing anyone. Hypocrisy only applies to the USA, not to China. So don't try to paint China with hypocrisy through propaganda and lies. The wold knows who the real Devil is. Continuing to demonize China through propaganda only proves to the world how low and evil the real Devil really is.

  • @buddybuddy5170
    @buddybuddy5170 Рік тому +10

    There is nothing wrong with "de-risking". We all should de-risk, just sound risk management. We are looking at two ways of de-risking: (1) by coupling together such that no one would want to rock the common boat; (2) by de-coupling from each other such that one is free to rock the other boat.

  • @templar1694
    @templar1694 10 місяців тому +3

    Manufacturing coming back to the USA will increase inflation in the USA. Outsourcing manufacturing in China is still profitable and cheaper. But security wise is making the USA vulnerable.

    • @justanghozzst8218
      @justanghozzst8218 3 місяці тому

      You underestimate the leaps and bounds made in automation technology. There's a political bent to this 'derisking' but it's coming at a perfect time technology wise to make industry work using higher skilled, lower staffed workers.

    • @petergilkes7082
      @petergilkes7082 3 місяці тому

      Yes, because TikTok is such a threat to America's national security!

  • @urimtefiki226
    @urimtefiki226 6 місяців тому +1

    India has a great potential with the young generation, companies can build their factories there.

  • @RETD_industrylIlIllIlIlIIIIlll
    @RETD_industrylIlIllIlIlIIIIlll 10 місяців тому +1

    Manufacturing is no more just manufacturing. Relying on any other country for key supplies is no more viable. Actually I'm quite surprised that before we were born world leaders decided that globalization is the better option just because of the cost efficiency. I mean I have no reason to believe that countries wouldn't use their economic leverage for geopolitical gains in previous century.

  • @zhjook
    @zhjook Рік тому +21

    De-Risking ? no ,it's De-Industrial what US & EU doing now

    • @amandagrant4331
      @amandagrant4331 Рік тому

      The United States today is not suitable for developing manufacturing.
      Forcing it is against economic laws.

    • @Maviel85
      @Maviel85 4 місяці тому

      Yup, and then our leaders and greedy special interests try to find targets to blame for their own stupidity and ideological kneecapping of our own economies. It is sad to see.

  • @sepam82
    @sepam82 8 місяців тому

    Very clever!!! Well planned. Cannot be faulted

  • @rajeshn5653
    @rajeshn5653 Рік тому

    Great efforts, need to extand in many area

  • @Agatha.wayne0
    @Agatha.wayne0 4 місяці тому +2

    The economy is in such a mess, whether you vote blue or red, they all seem like the same bad government. It's really sad to witness the many struggles our economy is going through right now, with uncertainties, housing problems, bad weather, foreclosures, global changes, and the aftermath of the pandemic all adding to the instability. The increasing inflation, sluggish growth, and trade disruptions urgently need attention from all sectors to restore stability and encourage growth. How do you think we can effectively tackle these issues?

    • @SarachiWowa
      @SarachiWowa 4 місяці тому

      I totally get what you mean! It's kinda worrying to watch the US dollar drop in value because of inflation while other currencies are getting stronger, making things feel uncertain. Even with that, there's still some trust in the dollar's safety. I see your point about being concerned about your $420,000 retirement savings possibly losing value. Thinking about other ways to protect your money seems like a smart idea. Have you thought about any particular alternatives or plans to keep your retirement savings secure?

    • @MaryWilliamson-h2o
      @MaryWilliamson-h2o 4 місяці тому

      With my demanding job, I lack time for investment analysis. For seven years, a fiduciary has managed my portfolio, adapting to market conditions, enabling successful navigation and informed decisions. Consider a similar approach.

    • @JamesFreedon
      @JamesFreedon 4 місяці тому

      This is definitely considerable! Do you think you could suggest any professionals or advisors I can get on the phone with? I'm in dire need of proper portfolio allocation.

  • @stephenyang2844
    @stephenyang2844 11 місяців тому +1

    I‘m curious if iPhones in India offer all Hindi variants ?

    • @souravjaiswal-jr4bj
      @souravjaiswal-jr4bj 11 місяців тому +1

      Most college-educated Indians use English exclusively. Shamefully I have to admit that I find difficulty in reading Hindi, my mother tongue.

  • @willliam1420
    @willliam1420 Рік тому +5

    De-risking is Western Double Speak for Trade War

  • @greatlakes7942
    @greatlakes7942 Рік тому +13

    Please note: what people expect is different from what people will achieve. My opinion is, no country else on earth, even the combination of G7, can compete with China in regards to manufacturing workforce diligence, discipline, skills and the most important factor, scale or quantity, as well as R&D expense

    • @htran3617
      @htran3617 Рік тому

      In that case, then why is China so keen on attracting foreign investments and foreign tech? Western companies are keen to de-risk from China, why should this bother the CCP? If no county on earth can compete with China, then surely the Chinese should celebrate the mass exodus of foreign companies and investments? Reality seemed to say otherwise.

    • @soothinglycool9806
      @soothinglycool9806 Рік тому

      Chinese products lack quality and manufactured by slave labour. It doesn't bother with r & d since it's easier to steal, hack, copy and reverse engineer western technology. Chinese billionaires fleeing China with billions. The yuan has crashed, its stock market on the floor and exports dried up. It's like the Chinese economy has returned to the stone age.

    • @nicholasfernanda367
      @nicholasfernanda367 Рік тому +1

      I mean i have been engaging in International trade in China for 6 years from local to corporate and goverment level and i can assure that , this is true without any doubts !!!!

    • @htran3617
      @htran3617 Рік тому +1

      @@nicholasfernanda367 In that case, then the CCP regime should not be so concern about US/Western companies de-coupling or de-risking from China then.

    • @1HeatWalk
      @1HeatWalk 11 місяців тому

      That's why most people are not having children especially in China. Toxic work culture and high cost.

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 11 місяців тому +4

    THAI Car Factories are preparing to convert diesel engine to electric battery power car productions to cater for market changes and for exports..

  • @LexyDesperado
    @LexyDesperado 8 місяців тому +11

    Can you imagine how wonderful life would be if the entire world was governed with wisdom by Xi and China! No more problems only Win Win for everyone!

    • @brianhlee4781
      @brianhlee4781 4 місяці тому

      You want another virus from china ???

    • @leonortenorio6604
      @leonortenorio6604 2 місяці тому

      @@LexyDesperado base on Philippines experience... china take advantages philippiness natural resources and make people become poor and hopeless.. xi and china are theft.. they export their illegal activities.. china govt become rich because of the china illegal activities and defective manufacturing.. when you deal with china.. no win win situation only china can win.. worst they make your country as narco country... they make other country under there mercy using belt and road initiative.. luckily because of strict Philippines constitutional laws.. Philippines never be part of belt and road project.. china can not fully take advantages the philippiness.. now with Japan and US assistance Philippines infra and economy is the one of the ASEAN fastest economy...

  • @Knowledgeably2023
    @Knowledgeably2023 7 місяців тому +1

    Interesting that TSMC is being run by the Chinese on American soil. Good that they have embraced the Chinese engineering prowess. Just curious, where does BRICS fit into all this for both India and China?

  • @ekobudisetiyo9010
    @ekobudisetiyo9010 11 місяців тому

    Some people do not understand what the meaning of Production Yield Percentage. At the end any company that that have highest Production Yield Percentage will win the battle. Politition can not just create rule that suddenly certain company have good Production Yield Percentage

  • @sed9406
    @sed9406 Рік тому +3

    it is US sanctioning China on chips, not the other way around. even if China reunite with Taiwan, they will probably export chips from them as always.

    • @dinglshingle
      @dinglshingle Рік тому

      i wouldnt call it reunion. conquer fits better

    • @sed9406
      @sed9406 Рік тому

      @@dinglshingle it is a civil war situation. imagine us north vs south, then south lost and fled to puerto rico, then UK intervined to stop the north from liberating the south, you got taiwan situation.

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      If China is not doing all these shady stuff, they would not be sanctioned. China sanctioned Australians as mentioned in part 1. They are not the victim here. Nobody would want change and spend more money to start over again elsewhere if not for the evil intentions shown by China all over the world, from Africa to Philippines to spy infiltration into many countries’ government and corporations.

  • @Alll2017
    @Alll2017 Рік тому +7

    Won’t the focus on AI and robotics solve the aging population issues in China?

    • @nicholasfernanda367
      @nicholasfernanda367 Рік тому +2

      This is true in certain point moreover China always have long-term plan for any problems

    • @takeround8293
      @takeround8293 9 місяців тому

      robots anywhere these days in China.

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      They will be the ones making AI that will annihilate this planet. Moral, ethics, and prolonging human life on earth are not their priority.

  • @apuntecamote
    @apuntecamote 4 місяці тому

    Nice moves

  • @danielwong2333
    @danielwong2333 Рік тому +13

    Now China is in the shining moment and best position to continue the momentum to super high techs and dorminant technology on all fronts including high end Chips. Of course RnD is a going on affairs and China must and should protect its own IP at all cost.

    • @htran3617
      @htran3617 Рік тому

      What IP are you talking about that was invented by the PRC? Everything ever built in the PRC is being copied from other countries, even their political ideology - was socialism/communism invented in China? Socialism with Chinese characteristics? LMAO.

    • @LetsGoUSA
      @LetsGoUSA Рік тому

      ua-cam.com/video/5VHMNbA8MsE/v-deo.htmlsi=r5nf0O1CcuejfLau

    • @mikkelmikkelsen976
      @mikkelmikkelsen976 11 місяців тому

      Sounds like an excellent idea, please do that 😂

    • @MrWheezyE420
      @MrWheezyE420 11 місяців тому

      Another reason for this whole de-risk move is because China doesn't do any of it's own RnD and owns no relevant IP that makes it competitive on a global scale. Their foundation is on stolen technology, stolen RnD and stolen IP. Cheap knockoffs can be found in every manufacturing industry and even in their military tech and hardware. All stolen. Good luck now the game is up and everyone distrusts anything coming out of Chinese officials mouths. Just look how long it took Chinese manufacturers to figure out how to accurately machine the tips for ball point pens and that was still using stolen tech from Germany.

  • @waldenli9232
    @waldenli9232 6 місяців тому

    What is the music around min 12?

  • @eclipsenow5431
    @eclipsenow5431 Рік тому +6

    Russia invaded Ukraine and the EU suddenly realised how dangerous it was to be addicted to Russian gas. "De-risking" from China is the same. Energy is national security. If a super-power like the USA cannot build their own wind and solar and computer chips and EV's - and the country they depend on suddenly invades Taiwan - where does that leave them? "Friend-shoring" is national security, period!

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha Рік тому

      "EU suddenly realised how dangerous it was to be addicted to Russian gas" - u r quiet wrong becoz Russia also depends on the income from its gas. EU chose this by theirselves by following US' order to sanction Russia hence Russia retaliated
      "If a super-power like the USA cannot build their own wind and solar and computer chips and EV's" - it cannot be a superpower to begin with, hence ur scenario is not realistic. to be a superpower, u control almost everything
      ur bootlicking disables your ability to think rationally. i can easily predict wat u r about to say or what u want to say

    • @eclipsenow5431
      @eclipsenow5431 Рік тому

      @@leexingha "EU chose this by theirselves" - sort of - except the German energy minister REALLY got Germany addicted to Russian gas and now works for Gazprom on $1million a year. So there was obviously some revolving doors corruption there. "it cannot be a superpower to begin with" - not sure what you're even saying here? Any economist or military strategist would laugh you out of court. "to be a superpower, u control almost everything" They police the oceans to keep international trade happening - and ARE a super-power - but they've decided they need to de-risk. They are a super-power whether they de-risk or not. One is an American super-power making stupid decisions and leaving their economy vulnerable to the sensitivities of an overseas dictator. Another is an American super-power making wiser decisions and derisking their lines of supply - and having safer trade relationships with friends. You see - China's proved THEMSELVES to be unreliable. China started this. I'm Australian. Our Prime Minister just asked for the W.H.O. to investigate whether or not Covid escaped a lab. China then dropped Australian trade worth $20 BILLION in retaliation. Now China's crying because the West saw that, and decided China was overly sensitive and NOT RELIABLE! And you're crying over it with them? Add all the sabre rattling over Taiwan, and having recently seen Germany on their knees before Putin - and I wouldn't blame them if every western nation decided to DECOUPLE ENTIRELY from China!

    • @sed9406
      @sed9406 Рік тому

      it is US sanctioning China on chips, not the other way around. even China reunite with Taiwan, they will probably export chips from their as always.

  • @lokesh303101
    @lokesh303101 Рік тому +19

    Titans do clash! China 🇨🇳 Advances as it has all means of Superiority in many of Strategic Areas that makes them Rise Above USA 🇺🇲.

    • @teng27
      @teng27 Рік тому

      Nope! China still behind that’s why the US is able to sanction China. If China is ahead you claimed China should be the one who sanctions the US and cutting the US from obtaining china’s high tech not the other way around.
      I bet you can’t name one modern technology we use today that was invented in China.

    • @tjm0112
      @tjm0112 Рік тому +2

      😂😂😂😂😂

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому +2

      Using upper-case letters does not make your claim more valid.

    • @lokesh303101
      @lokesh303101 Рік тому

      @@pjacobsen1000 upper-case is not upper case Bro!

  • @jameskamotho7513
    @jameskamotho7513 Рік тому

    Interesting times ahead...

  • @puskarpokhrel5576
    @puskarpokhrel5576 10 місяців тому +7

    No more unipolar world ,now the era of multipolar world has begun.This is the time of global south

  • @josephwallis8965
    @josephwallis8965 Рік тому +8

    The truth of the matter is 1 modern German machinary in Shanghai can make 7x excessive amount of shoes globally, this tells us that in manufacturing, they can move it to whichever country with cheaper and good labour for low tech, that's also why China is at crossroads itself, industry move onto cheaper labour cost

    • @daphuc502
      @daphuc502 Рік тому +1

      not quite , my country is Vietnam and we have a lot cheaper labour than China but Chinese products are still a hundred to a thousand times cheaper than ours . Just imagine in order to make a shirt, you have to spend 10cents on the linen alone to make it , that is not counting other costs such as labour , electricities ...ect.. , and China is selling a well made brand new product that travelled thousands of miles through numerous middle men and the final prices is still 2 cents. Why ? because it is due to extreme heavy subsidies. China is a communist state, so they used to have state owned companies , in which the government used tax money to finance the whole operations and the companies absolutely have to do nothing and can make huge losses but the workers still get paid by government , because it is a communist worker paradise country. when China joined the global economy and started capitalist free market economy , they used exactly the same state owned companies treatment, but now it is geared towards export oriented industrial private own companies. China can make a car cheaper than they sell it for scrape metals , not because it is cheaper there, but there are extreme subsidies.

    • @wichaipongthadaporn2026
      @wichaipongthadaporn2026 Рік тому +1

      ⁠​⁠@@daphuc502You said like you are not Vietnamese! Vietnam is also a communist country same as China! Why don’t your government subsidize you and others Vietnamese business as China do? And according to the information that I have about subsidies in China, there is not very high as you said especially for the labor intensive manufacturing and business (garment, toys, shoes, etc.). The Chinese government subsidizes a lot more on green energy, EV, chips, space, AI and quantum technologies.

    • @daphuc502
      @daphuc502 Рік тому

      @@wichaipongthadaporn2026 we have subsidize state owned companies too , a huge numbers of them went bankrupt after privatizations, some companies such as electricity, water ..ect.. and other public , state owned are subsidized., but not private owned companies. communism subsidize nationalized companies. China is a fascist imperialist country that heavily subsidize privately owned companies , they learned it from imperial Japan back in the days.

    • @ekobudisetiyo9010
      @ekobudisetiyo9010 11 місяців тому

      @@daphuc502 God never stop any country to heavily subsidies any company. Whether the country can do it or the country can not do it that is the real root cause of problem.

    • @oliveryb
      @oliveryb 11 місяців тому

      @@daphuc502this is the only maybe 10% of the root cause, open you eyes and think wilder

  • @cathayview
    @cathayview 29 днів тому

    Derisking and industry policy are totally different. Industry policy for EV in China enables Tesla to benefit from production in China.

  • @seanlcs
    @seanlcs 9 місяців тому

    I think many Americans think bringing home the manufacturing industries is a good idea. But, i doubt the outcomes will be positive. The final products will be too expensive due to high labour cost, utitlities, transportation, storage etc. But, domestic demand only may not be profitable enough for growth, R&D, etc. Unless US government artificially keep USD low and heavily subsidized for export. And, Fed need to reduce inflation tremendously. China knows that they can't keep the labour cost low forever; or maybe keep Yuan low forever....that could be a reason for shifting their factories to Africa and South East Asia.

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 Рік тому +3

    Chinese are changing the Chinese Rail system to replace the Jet engine... Chinese Rail Locomotives will use Nitrogen to push Chinese Train to 600 km / hour..

    • @mvmohan2003
      @mvmohan2003 Рік тому

      China pushes to nowhere, she is best at it.

    • @davidrichards1741
      @davidrichards1741 Рік тому +2

      When I visited recently, the HSR line was 680 km/hr, the fastest on earth, and they're developing a maglev for 1100 km/hr. That's faster than a boeing jet, plus the trains doors and wheels don't fall off like so many Boeing passenger jets nowadays. And their HSR trains are way more spacious & comfortable than any dang airplane, with way better food and baggage space.

    • @vanveakrin276
      @vanveakrin276 11 місяців тому +1

      With Maglev Nitrogen system.... Chinese will replace Jet engine planes with Maglev Nitrogen Train to offer cheaper transport

    • @vanveakrin276
      @vanveakrin276 11 місяців тому

      Chinese must develope the Chinese system for a New Century...to change from Old 20th Century ideas in order to go into the 21 st Century with different concepts different from the Past White Race concept of the past.. Chinese must build a different system for the Chinese people..

  • @kappa633
    @kappa633 8 місяців тому +1

    Globalization was a term given just by US politicians to lining their pockets they outsourced almost every sector to china because of greed if US had retained its manufacturing and not just became a consumer economy like its now. It would still be in good shape. But now all manufacturing sector is lost never to recover to china which has full supply chain and fully integrated and in everything they first made cheap products now they make good products and in future will be fully dependent on everything and will innovate more. US greedy politicians bought this themselves i dont know what so many think tanks were doing in the usa not imagining this inevitable future for decades

  • @vidhanrana
    @vidhanrana Рік тому +2

    May I suggest you something, stop using old slum shots to describe India, true that some parts of the cities do have slums but it's equally true that it's a tiny fraction .. spend some amount of money to buy some.better footage that objectively represent modern India.

    • @AllenWong-d1y
      @AllenWong-d1y 4 місяці тому

      lol True... CNA should take footage of slums in US cities also. CNA is a propaganda machine for the US government and bashes any country that threatens USA.

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 Рік тому +4

    Japanese has changed.. the American went to sleep.. Chinese are changing.. the American is still enjoying the undisturbed long rest in a Disney Fairytale Land

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      Should it matter? They should be allowed to rest if they wish. The problem is we are worried no one will go up against anti-democratic countries, and evil power will take over the world. Not everyone likes to be censored, not being able to access over 250,000 websites and apps because 1 person said so, lack of freedom of speech and mobility, as well as corruption and injustice x1000 of that in a democratic counterpart.

  • @edgardeguzman2809
    @edgardeguzman2809 Рік тому +3

    Indias oldest and best friend is Russia why does US invest so much in India ? Hopefully the wedge will work

    • @danhtran6401
      @danhtran6401 Рік тому

      Because India is half democracy. China is all dictatorial...

    • @shasha0076
      @shasha0076 Рік тому +8

      Instead of asking such stupid questions you should ask why US n west has been pouring investment n business in china from last 4 decades which they consider as their top enemy?🤣🤦 Instead of questioning a non aligned country

  • @whitemoon5752
    @whitemoon5752 8 місяців тому

    Let understand this: US has almost 35 trillions in debt, borrows another total 1.4 trillion towards chips, IRA, infrastructure act at 5% coupon rate to fund and then politicians expect that inflation will go down and also wonder why private investment are not eager to invest using their own money? Ultimately those chips produced in US needs a market to sell, where they will sell to? China is the biggest market in the world for Chips by far. So then US will start dumping those in global markets with almost zero return of capital. All this is done to enhance national security of US. How can you have national security when you are bankrupt?

  • @funpau7549
    @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

    It took China 40 years to go to where it is now. It should take Mexico, India, etc much shorter time. Once the first person climbed Mt Everest, the process gets repeated in much more effective and efficient ways.

    • @hongqi5734
      @hongqi5734 4 місяці тому

      @funpau7549 - -
      India's development began around the same time as China's in the early 1990s, but it is still 15 to 20 years behind. India will always lose to China.

  • @hansbleuer3346
    @hansbleuer3346 Рік тому

    Informstive Video.

  • @partoems9376
    @partoems9376 11 місяців тому +1

    American manufacturing is back with TSMC from China. Where is American Semiconductor Manufacturing Company -ASMC? None.

  • @mack-uv6gn
    @mack-uv6gn Рік тому +10

    This piece is correct China started decoupling first and now they are complaining because others are doing it.🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @lowwastehighmelanin
      @lowwastehighmelanin Рік тому +3

      They're the embodiment of "Rules for thee, not for me!"

    • @AnAverageChinese
      @AnAverageChinese Рік тому +5

      They banned high end chips and techs and many others to sell to China! What do you expect China to do except “de-risking” and make these by themselves?

    • @mack-uv6gn
      @mack-uv6gn Рік тому

      @@AnAverageChinese did you read my comment correctly?

    • @buffaloalice8413
      @buffaloalice8413 Рік тому +1

      Well yeah. In spite of the rhetoric about how they want to be a respected member of a global economy, you’d have to be a complete fool to believe they will simply end it there. It was NEVER about being friends, it’s always been about dominance and control. That’s the whole point behind the Belt and Road initiative. On the surface, they appear to be a friendly ally in the effort to help small countries with weak economies modernize their infrastructures with loans and labor. But if you look beyond that, it is far more sinister and it is at least twofold. First, the borrower is slave to the lender. The borrower will either be under the sway of the lender, or submit to them entirely. Second, the loan would obviously be written to benefit the lender in the event of a default. This would likely give the CCP control over their assets and resources without shedding a drop of blood. So not only does the CCP get their stuff, they now have the infrastructure to continue sourcing it and transport it. It’s predatory lending on an international scale.

    • @jxmai7687
      @jxmai7687 Рік тому

      @@mack-uv6gn Who is "they", you made other people confuse. 🙃

  • @critique7767
    @critique7767 4 місяці тому +1

    USA just wake up now after china stole all its tech from US tech companies and its military😂 US never learn her lessons from the past.

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 Рік тому +17

    Good luck if you choose India

  • @brianliew5901
    @brianliew5901 Рік тому +19

    The only for America to compete with China is by mastering Mandarin otherwise the chances will be rather slim.

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому +1

      Ever heard of translators, human or electronic?

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 Рік тому +2

      @@pjacobsen1000 You need to know Chinese to understand how the Chinese think and if you don't, forget it; know yourself, know your enemy, a hundred battles fought, a hundred battles won. Nevermind, you won't understand it.

    • @danhtran6401
      @danhtran6401 Рік тому +2

      US is into high-end products like satellites, nuclear powered submarines, jets, not Thai talking coffee makers.... don't fancy yourself. You're competitive with India....

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому

      @@brianliew5901 I do know Chinese, but business people don't have to know the language of every country they do business in. Chinese business people do business all over the world while only speaking Chinese. It can work, don't worry.

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 Рік тому +1

      @@danhtran6401 What do you know? 😂😂😂😂

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 11 місяців тому +1

    China is building rail lines in Northern part of ASEAN to feed into China ' s RAIL network to offer cheaper transport for NORTHERN ASEAN.. Myanmar to Kun Min ., Vientiane to Kun Min , Bangkok to Kun Min , Phnom Penh to Kun Min via Thailand... Singapore to Kun Min...

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 11 місяців тому

      It will facilitate the transport of goods in either direction helping land locked countries export their produce and products increasing the standard of living for all along the rail network.

    • @leonortenorio6604
      @leonortenorio6604 11 місяців тому

      let see if will happen soon those trail way... possible asean they feed china for food.. 😂😂😂😂

  • @marklee8512
    @marklee8512 Рік тому +3

    These channel merely repeat the "words" by the Western world, but the most important is the "actions". Do we really trust those NATO (no actions, talks only) countries? Let's wait and see the "results".

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      NATO is overtaken by the Chinese. Of course there’s no action, they just want chaos around the world.

  • @orvilleclisby6748
    @orvilleclisby6748 9 місяців тому

    It's hard to green the shipping industry so local production is important.

  • @richiesd1
    @richiesd1 11 місяців тому +1

    De-risking will only add costs and slow down adoption of new technology for the betterment of society. It is better to cooperate and trade with one another without threats of cutting off supply or sanctions. To be honest, it is the west that practices all the risks that it’s trying to prevent. For example, Russia is perfectly happy to sell energy. It is the west that is blocking Russian energy from international markets thus increasing costs for everybody. It is the west that is blocking technology sales to China, not the other way around.

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 11 місяців тому

      Are you a Chinese or a Russian troll bot? I can't tell. I can tell, though, that both nations are feeling awfully sorry for themselves. ;-)

    • @stefanoparlatore7141
      @stefanoparlatore7141 7 місяців тому

      Russia invades to conquer a peaceful neighbouring country. And btw started to increase gas prices before that to pressure Europeans. Natural gas prices was 2-3 times what is now before the invasion.

  • @1pasupaty
    @1pasupaty 11 місяців тому

    We need to figure out someothernway .his right.developimg nations with huge populations need to acquire some kind of tech to power their manufacturing atkeast for local usage

  • @Show_what_I_Love
    @Show_what_I_Love Рік тому +2

    Dont worry, show these 10 percent population pictures to portray whole country as slums. There are thousands of big corporate buildings , millions of homes of middle n upper middle class people. Top class infra, but you will never show that. Only slums. Bravo.

  • @yosifmetodiev3834
    @yosifmetodiev3834 Рік тому +9

    It's de-risking for China, because they already took control over the global supply chains.
    It's decoupling for the USA, but you might as well call it "risk-escalation". Higher public spending, higher debt and higher prices for relocating manufacturing facilities will trigger a higher inflation.
    I think China already won this one.

    • @danhtran6401
      @danhtran6401 Рік тому

      They won the chip ban... imagine when China runs out of chips, they'll be back to making chopsticks.... 😂

    • @happymelon7129
      @happymelon7129 Рік тому +3

      😂What actually happening is the "Global South" de-risking from G7 . USD.

    • @yosifmetodiev3834
      @yosifmetodiev3834 Рік тому +2

      ​@@danhtran6401China has millions of engineers working on chip tech. They (claim to) have significant breakthrough on some of the high end models. The rest they smuggle in through third countries. Also China holds all of the raw materials mining and processing needed for manufacturing the chips. I think they have the upper hand.

    • @leexingha
      @leexingha Рік тому +3

      @@danhtran6401 enjoy the days, my friend. by the time we have the capability to manufacture/create our own nano chip, then u can kiss goodbye to one of the world's largest market & u might even find the rest of the world buying from us and not from the US anymore due to price 😊 cheers!

    • @stevewang2
      @stevewang2 Рік тому +1

      @@leexingha Go China!

  • @garyng743
    @garyng743 Місяць тому

    More competition the more better

  • @netizencapet
    @netizencapet 4 місяці тому

    Please use voiceovers for non-English content, not just subtitles!!

  • @HanonInstruments
    @HanonInstruments Рік тому +2

    人的邪恶在于:人都是先有立场,再有是非观

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 Рік тому +2

    Good Luck Cummins engine

  • @Utube1024
    @Utube1024 Рік тому +1

    America was once the manufacturing house, not any more. America now practicing protectionism when they are not competitive. Sad.

  • @rgolianeh
    @rgolianeh 6 місяців тому

    It looks like US manufacturing is good as long as there is no competition. How does that work?

  • @crawfordm.j.7954
    @crawfordm.j.7954 Рік тому +2

    Most people in the East would not buy iPhone , macbooks from America

  • @albertwong1919
    @albertwong1919 Рік тому +2

    I am always reminded by the laws of nature which Capitalism and economics also adhere to religiously that is the path of least resistance.... not sure what kind of spin and twisted logic this CNA program is trying to send out... for Companies they want to have the most efficient and cost effective place to manufacture and deliver their products this is the reason why Singapore still has a very attractive port and airport because our infrastructure is cost competitive and efficient.
    Just from already tells us this talk about de-risking and supply change arent business decisions by ideological and political decisions to the detriment of these vary companies that are willing to sacrifice their markets and establish supply chains instead of further improvements and ensuring stronger resilience to these chains.
    China is already moving up the technologic chain towards AI, robotics, Quantum computing etc... it has both the brain power and also the financial muscle to do so there will be pains and sacrifices to be made, but the Belt and Road and Xi's vision of the world 20 years ago remains unchanged and has proven him right on his decision to made in China the prove is the current rabid sanctions promoted by the US and its lapdog western allies including S Korea, and Japan.

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      Seriously, if China has moral, ethics, shame and care for our environment, everyone is happy for its advancement. Now, everyone is just freaked out about the bloom of an evil monster.

  • @arielinky2178
    @arielinky2178 Місяць тому

    While this documentary highlights some interesting facts, it's clearly left out details like the conditions of Chinese factories outside China, fake food products from China, repacked in SEA and exported, and CNA is a from Singapore, a Chinese country. The deforestation in Indonesia is just heartbreaking.

  • @RichardB-g3e
    @RichardB-g3e Рік тому +2

    Russia used micro chips to find people in forest in the dark. Can it help rescue Gundam pilots in Space 🌌🚀 for all those love space 🌌🚀 leah too

  • @takeround8293
    @takeround8293 9 місяців тому

    There is an old story in China begin with “卡脖子”, now is de-risk

  • @lowwastehighmelanin
    @lowwastehighmelanin Рік тому +10

    I'm American, we NEED manufacturing jobs back. It's actually taking way too long but we're getting there. My hope is that once everyone's economy stabilizes, we can all be friends again as true equals. It's naive probably but it's what we all deserve. I will continue to hope for this.

    • @haoli5779
      @haoli5779 Рік тому +8

      No one TAKE away American's job away. These jobs are running away from US themself. As long as the US dollar remains the world currency, the US manufacture industry in general will not last good.

    • @DwightMeline
      @DwightMeline Рік тому +9

      How many people can afford American-made products? American-made cars can only be sold locally in the United States, and they are too expensive

    • @jxmai7687
      @jxmai7687 Рік тому +4

      Stop the war machine and invest back to the country first.

    • @ckwong1533
      @ckwong1533 Рік тому +2

      ​@@jxmai7687That the most lucrative industries, how to stop.. I help uncle Sam GDP so much. How the time is coming as USD loses it dominant.. by confiscating Russia foreign reserve. The worst move ever taken..

    • @Jamie-nt3eh
      @Jamie-nt3eh Рік тому +1

      things take long becasue every politician wants their share of the pork

  • @vanveakrin276
    @vanveakrin276 11 місяців тому

    India is a double face nation seeking CASH and OPPORTUNITY following the CASH FLOW for feed its population which needs help as the Rich Indian is fixed strongly in the Indian Upper CASTE to control the Indian Lower CASTE who will be kept in poverty for life..

  • @TanChoonHong
    @TanChoonHong 10 місяців тому

    How does "De-Risking From China" work when the industrial parks & factories are dominated by Chinese enterprises?

  • @NeroXing
    @NeroXing Рік тому +5

    Maybe the next step after free capitalism is state capitalism.
    Industrial policy is not invented by China. I just wondering those companies benefited by Chinese policies are mainly state owned. How the other countries earn back the money spent on their policies?

    • @cyruszielinski5849
      @cyruszielinski5849 Рік тому

      It directly relates to GDP as well as defense prospects. Semiconductor manufacturing is the deciding factor. Everything runs on them and China cannot manufacture them to the quality or scale required to be competitive. It relies on Taiwan.

    • @NeroXing
      @NeroXing Рік тому

      @@cyruszielinski5849 Sorry, I'm not getting your point.

    • @cyruszielinski5849
      @cyruszielinski5849 Рік тому

      @@NeroXing the return on investment is that the United States stays at the top of the current world order and isn’t usurped by China.

  • @Continentalmunkey88
    @Continentalmunkey88 11 місяців тому

    26:48 one generation India. Cross multiples of 800 million public and Dow moves aggresively, Kinley installs BJP not fiberOptic but loose guidance, its not a heat seeking torpedo nor a landfill or subsidy

  • @Việt.Nam.Phiêu.Lưu.Ký
    @Việt.Nam.Phiêu.Lưu.Ký Рік тому +1

    😂 clean up those Space Junks and Rubbishes first before think about how the world gonna move around. Cannot solve space junks. No point to put all developments in building a world running by Eyes from space.

  • @aleonyohan6745
    @aleonyohan6745 10 місяців тому +2

    In 2024 the United States has the best performing economy in the world. Enough said.

    • @AllenWong-d1y
      @AllenWong-d1y 4 місяці тому

      Yet the US government can't take care of it's home front. Homeless, housing affordability, drug addiction, violence and poverty. Capitalism at its best.

    • @4tress300zx
      @4tress300zx 4 місяці тому

      Said Donald Chump!

  • @Roosevalt5
    @Roosevalt5 7 місяців тому

    Jake Sullivan should also say what the IMF achieved for the world.

  • @rubylaser8601
    @rubylaser8601 6 місяців тому +2

    China had been decoupling. America should too.

  • @animeshlahiriwithsrirupa
    @animeshlahiriwithsrirupa Рік тому +23

    This video is very cleverly made to forward Chinese interest and superiority and showing the weak points of its competitors, particularly, India. Its main point is, it is pointless to derisk against China.

    • @Saks6951
      @Saks6951 Рік тому +4

      They did not talk about ughers genocide but they talk about Muslims in india

    • @tonyjiang2328
      @tonyjiang2328 Рік тому +8

      @@Saks6951what genocide

    • @Jamie-nt3eh
      @Jamie-nt3eh Рік тому +9

      india's problems were glossed overed! india's infrastructure is bad and haven't changed since colonial days. still using trains from british masters with all round seating. electricity is way behind stanadards. government bureaucracy and corruption is rampant.

    • @pjacobsen1000
      @pjacobsen1000 Рік тому +4

      That was not my take-away from the video. But as an Indian, you are perhaps especially sensitive to what is being said about your country. Better take off the overly patriotic glasses and face reality: India is improving, but you're not quite there yet. I think you will get there, though, it will just take some time; 5 years, 10 years, 15.....

    • @AManavian
      @AManavian Рік тому

      CNA is Singapore media. Of course they will indirectly support China while pretending they are a neutral trading nation.

  • @thomhodgson2721
    @thomhodgson2721 11 місяців тому

    Which part of the series goes over their surveillance state and human rights violations?

  • @Deepaksingh-fi5qp
    @Deepaksingh-fi5qp 11 місяців тому

    This js extremely shameful that all the news you pointed about India is highly negative and you filtered all the facts also the video stocks footage is the worst quality that you can get. It shows your political bias in the journalism.

  • @willng247
    @willng247 Рік тому +3

    The key difference with China lies in its 10-year plan. Unlike democratic nations, China doesn't need to constantly seek approval from its electorate. It plans and executes policies efficiently, running the country like a successful company. This approach involves selecting the most suitable candidates to drive progress, in contrast to democratic countries where popularity can override qualifications in leadership choices. This highlights the increasing flaws in democratic systems, which often appear disastrously inefficient.

    • @bobsmith3983
      @bobsmith3983 11 місяців тому

      Democracies are inherently inefficient and that is why they are failing. Western democracies were successful in the past because they plundered other countries wealth which glossed over their failed system but times have changed and plunder is no longer viable as France has found out in Africa.

    • @funpau7549
      @funpau7549 4 місяці тому +1

      You are free to move to an authoritarian country. Please leave our democratic countries alone. You wouldn’t be able to leave comments here if you are from China unless if you work for the government, most of the population are not allowed on UA-cam.

  • @thehikimi
    @thehikimi 11 місяців тому +2

    I do not see what India bring to the table 😂