Розмір відео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показувати елементи керування програвачем
Автоматичне відтворення
Автоповтор
Hi from Nashville and I am fan of your works from very begining! I was looking for the 269 and this video helps me a lot. Thank you!
Thank you. I’m going to sell one of my m269s if you are interested let me know
First, they all sound great. Also, you guys have epic vocals. Congrats on being awesome!1. I’ve owned M269cs and U67s.2. I think the variability can be explained by the power supplies and distances from the mics. All are epic.
3,1 and 2 from my quick listen. Here the number 3 sounded fatter but the number 1 sounded crispier . All are great though!
I'd say #3 is the best with #1 being a close second. Could see #1 being good in the mix being a bit brighter.
Nr.1= midrange (r), nr.2 = bass (m), nr.3 = highs (l). Personally, I prefer mic nr.1, because it captures the most important tonality of the voice.
Hi from Nashville and I am fan of your works from very begining! I was looking for the 269 and this video helps me a lot. Thank you!
Thank you. I’m going to sell one of my m269s if you are interested let me know
First, they all sound great. Also, you guys have epic vocals. Congrats on being awesome!
1. I’ve owned M269cs and U67s.
2. I think the variability can be explained by the power supplies and distances from the mics. All are epic.
3,1 and 2 from my quick listen. Here the number 3 sounded fatter but the number 1 sounded crispier . All are great though!
I'd say #3 is the best with #1 being a close second. Could see #1 being good in the mix being a bit brighter.
Nr.1= midrange (r), nr.2 = bass (m), nr.3 = highs (l). Personally, I prefer mic nr.1, because it captures the most important tonality of the voice.