No one has explained the differences between Shia and sunni better than he has. This is the channel that deserves millions of subscribers. Sadly all the reverts go to Asim Hakeem and consume a bunch of nonsense.
Nope, He misrepresented the Sunni perspective by supporting his rafidhi narratives. He misquotes our points and doesn’t tell our proper history. Read the texts to understand the truth. These rafidhis will always lie upon our name and would mislead you. He cunningly says Companions in Sunnis weren't ahl al bayt indirectly while separating ahl al bayt from companions in his religion. If you study the sunni books, the so called Shia Imams start to feel like Sunnis since we have quotes from them. We also have quotes saying they were lied about by misguided people. We have different versions of Ahl Al Bayt in Sunni and Shias. Never learn through yt videos of people of the claim isn't backed by a proper source. (The companions include Ahl Al Bayt as well but not all of them are ahl al bayt)
@@wazzabanzook5028 you don't know the context. I won't bother explaining since after every few replies I get dragged into a comment section debate. You're just trying to fit your own narrative by cherry picking our sources. These claims have already been debunked several times by our scholars. Kindly go and study them instead of listening from weirdos in debates. Check textual evidences. That's all I would say, even if I got the answers I won't answer you because what you desire is something only you can understand through studying, study it instead of wasting time by watching debates where half the times there are baseless claims or lies. 👍 may Allah guide you
It’s interesting when you see that none of the Sunni leaders or countries have raised one single weapon against Israel in defence of the Palestinians and only the Shia have, I see this as a clear sign from Allah that who is the guided and who is the hypocrite. Because in the Quran it is mentioned that the hypocrites sit with the sitters and never go to war against the enemies of Islam. Well we are seeing this in front of our own eyes as a sign. And Allah knows best
@@wazzabanzook5028 Did you even read my comment carefully?? Do you know what sarcasm is? Do you understand the meaning of “your lying eyes”? And what’s up with “cowboy”? …..??? If you can’t comprehend sarcasm when people agree with you….maybe you shouldn’t be commenting on issues🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
The six difference really strongly resonates with me. It’s all the great companions are so blameless and praise worthy as the Sunni like to claim, why therefore, can’t we study and scrutinize them, won’t we be instead, inspired and well guided, rather than confused or misdirected if we do if they are such good examples? Anyone who wants to you believe something sight unseen, proof ungiven, details unverified, questions unwelcome, is hiding something.
You speak very beautifully As a Shia myself I thank you for explaining our point of view very clearly and on point My Allah guide you and your viewers to the truth
He talks in a sophisticated manner lol to confuse the average listener into believing he’s smart. Let’s test this and break down the belief system of the Shia, muta, beating themselves, taqqiya 24/7, hatred for the sahaba and wives of prophet, siding with non Muslims against wars with Muslims for eg Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria in modern times, and the biggest sin idolatry
the moment u look at that thmnail.... u know he got the salafi wahabi schlokar pic and he is talking about shia vs sunni so he will be 1 trillion percent wrong and i cant take this seriously..... first u need to know the diff btw sunni and wahabi to progress further and takl about ismaili, shia and sufis... ignortant and he is wrong
@@flag_bearertruth6257 Attention to detail brother. He put 'Sunni' in inverted commas. The Shia are the real AhlulSunna. The entirity of those who follow Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quharafa are misguided.
@@GatekeeperOfTruth i agree with you. we believe abu bakr is not far from phorah , what he did in saqifa. but what ia m most people dont understand who is salafi -wahabi . khwariji, nasibi and ahle sunnah. the uploader put wahabi scholar picture and in the title, he said, sunnah which is a blatant mistake.
The First invitation of Islam: The feast of "Dawat Dhul-'Asheera" at which Muhammad(saww), the Apostle of God, designated Ali ibn Abi Talib, as his successor, is a historical event, and its authenticity has been affirmed, among others, by the following Arab historians: 1. Tabari, History, Vol. II,p. 217 2. Kamil ibn Atheer, History, Vol. II, p. 22 3. Abul Fida,History, Vol. I, p. 116
This division would not have occurred if we would have listened to the prophet when he appointed Ali as his successor. But no. Everyone was fighting for the thrown.
I always wished someone would come and explain the shia perpective which is extremely important for the faith ,it is really necessary to point out that its not just a political dispute
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Great video. The fact that Abu Baker outlawed the circulation, documentation and narration of Ahadith for a 100 years, to me is a HUGE tell. I wish you had mentioned it. Again, great video, which I’ve saved.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
I never new you had your personal UA-cam channel mehn this is great have been waiting just to see your videos in rafida plus Am a new Shi'a convert and I am very excited about this deep analogy that you bring it Please keep on creating such high quality content regardless if you have many or few viewers we highly appreciate may Allah accept your good deeds
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Malik please keep doing more content no matter if you have very few views, truth never needs widespread preaching it moves on its own pace and the way you are doing this job is phenomenal ❤.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Connecting dot, Hadith Qirtas: Translation] [Hazrat Ibn Abbas(ra) narrated “When the ailment of the Prophet(saww) became worse, he said, ‘Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.’ But Umar said, ‘The Prophet is seriously ill, and we have got Allah’s Book with us and that is sufficient for us.’ But the companions of the Prophet(saww) differed about this and there was a hue and cry. On that, the Prophet(saww) said to them, ‘Get up (and leave me alone). It is not right that you should quarrel in front of me.”] (Sahih al-Bukhari)
Why did it take me so long to find this channel? My brother may Allah swt bless you beyond your comprehension in both worlds, for being open-minded on this topic. I stopped debating people about this very crucial topic because everyone is with the assumption that all the companions are rightly guided and saved by Allah irrespective of their shortcomings. Hence nobody wants to touch this topic and until the ummah wake up to the reality of circumstances that led to the Shia-Sunni division, Muslims will continue to slaughter themselves. It saddens me so much when others pretend to be in the middle by saying they’re just “Muslims”. Is their salat, fasting, beliefs, practices etc the Sunni way or the Shia way? Both ways cannot be true. Only one has. Which of the ways was taught by the prophet (saww)?
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
The Sunni view of leadership ends up with a disaster by design A. You have Shura people get a good leader B. You have a Shura people pick a bad leader C. You have a military takeover and a good leader emerges D. You have a military takeover and a bad leader emerges E. Good leader arranges a Shura which is 50-50% F. Good leader hands over to relative or trusted vizier and again it’s a toss up Every change of power is a coin flip. Even if the Muslims get a good leader takes power there nothing to prevent an evil military strongman from removing him and you have to start from scratch again.
Yes indeed and another thing Sunni claims that Abubakr became the leader of the Muslims by shura ( voting ) but at the same time Umar was not voted by the Muslims he was APOINTED by Abubakr before his death and that’s a contradiction of how the sunnis see the succession process and another thing is how did Abubakr apointe a successor and the Prophet himself didn’t ??? Like some people don’t understand how silly this is a prophet chosen from Allah don’t lead his people to the right path and leaves them to decide on their own ???
@@H00H-H00H there is a verse in the Bible For “God is not a God of confusion but of peace” in the Quran there is a verse “Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.” The question would be to Sunnis what other system designed by God is this chaotic? Imagine if Salat were sometimes Magrib is 1 rakat other times it’s 5 who knows what in the mystery box at the masjid?
@@salimsopari Thank you. Sunnism (Umarism) is appealing to street level and low IQ talking points and deception through words such as Sunni. The brand creates such a false impression as if these guys are the only people who follow the Sunna and everyone else ignores it.
@@luciansilver4113 God damn both of them then. They are in hell. Am I out of Islam for that? It is funny that nothing makes you angrier than saying anything slightly bad about these two guys and yet you are not venerating them.
It’s a mistake to assume the division happened after the prophet died. The division was there from the beginning especially within the first years of Islam. This has been clearly and unmistakably captured by the Quran in many, many verses. Indeed, the exact same division existed in every prophet’s community. This is the way Allah wanted it.
@@nycguycpt Allah must test the community through something difficult for the people to accept or follow. Otherwise what’s the point if everyone is equal in virtue which they will all appear to be in the absence of a test. This theme is mentioned numerous times in the Quran.
@@quranjadeed We don't have the feature of commenting with photos here unfortunately, but I do have the screenshot of you saying the Quran is corrupted saved. Stay away from us Rafida and say what you want.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
The production level is amazing. I used to be a "sunni". Now wouldn't claim to be shia or sunni, but I am way more sympathetic to the shia views. My humble advice is if you point out how the sources of sunni islam are biased (Abu Hurayrah and Aisha: in Bukhari) and make people more aware of the battle of the camel which is never spoken about by sunnis, a lot of "sunnis" will see the shia view and it de-radicalises extremists and ideologues on top of that.
If the people were to choose a leader, they certainly wouldn't have selected Muhammad ﷺ. Abu Sufyan had more leadership qualities and capabilities than others to become the leader. However, after the Sunnis accepted God's choice, they suddenly shifted and decided that they should choose their leader themselves, mixing divine decree with earthly decision. Additionally, the idea that the Prophet would leave the community without a successor is an insult to his wisdom, intelligence, and political acumen.
@@1364FILM Isn't what you said in the beginning about Abu Sufyan being more qualified an insult to the Prophet's (صلى الله عليه وآله) wisdom, intelligence and political acumen? What's wrong with you?
@@MohammedAbdul-Hameed You don't understand correctly! If becoming a prophet was based on earthly criteria, Abu Sufyan would certainly have been superior to Muhammad! He had wealth, was older, and was a leader of Mecca! Muhammad was a simple shepherd who worked for Khadijah! But God knew better and chose Mohammad ﷺ ! This is not insulting , insulting is when you picked Abu Baker just because he was older and ignored Mohammad ﷺ command
@@1364FILM That's a more appropriate way to put it, although even by human standards the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله) was the noblest, most honest and trustworthy man. The pagans of Mecca were ready to make him their king on the condition that he stops insulting their idols.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Thank you for sharing your knowledge, Brother Malik. I am learning so much about Islamic history from your content. I still have much to learn and understand, and one matter that confuses me is the role of Imam Ali (a.s) as a caliph. What does it mean that he became a caliph, and why didn't Muslims come together during his caliphate?
The Jews did not follow the Caliph after Moses, who was Aaron as brothers, and the Messiah did not follow the Caliph who was installed by Jesus, who was Barnabas. Or Shamoun Al-Safa Muslims followed the biography of the first ones and did not follow the Caliph the position which is Imam Ali was appointed by the Prophet Mohamed by Allah in the pledge of allegiance to Alghadeer because he killed the Unbelievers of their people and that is why they hate him The Qur'an said to you Allah and his messenger and those who believe who perform prayer and pay Zakat while kneeling This verse was revealed by Imam Ali and it is an explicit verse that proves the caliphate to Ali and the Quran said and Mohamed is only a messenger that the messengers have been abandoned before him If he dies or is killed you will turn on your heels The Sunnah follows Who overturned after k-illing the raw and burned the house of the daughter of the raw because she did not pledge allegiance to them and the captivity of the women of the raw and ki-lled his grandchildren
being caliph in the Islamic sense is being the representative of Allah on earth as the prophet was, it's not just a political position, within muslims their are the good the bad and the out right hypo,crites just look at the muslims today most look at their brothers in Palestine and just don't care and some conspire against them, only few who are truthful
Caliph means successor. Muslims should have paid their allegiance to Imam Ali (peace be upon him) since day one after the Prophet’s martyrdom (صلى الله عليه وآله). This title (Caliph) has been hijacked and given to hyp,ocrits who climbed to the position of power through plots, schemes and viol,nc. The corruption started by the first three ‘Caliphs’ encouraged other greedy companions to go after power and wealth, and opened the door for rebellion against Imam Ali (peace be upon him).
That's more like it. Being a Sunni, I have always said there is no Union between Shia and Sunni. They are two completely different religions working on different ideology who have no congruency between them. Any attempt of joining them and false brotherhood is nothing but a pipedream. It is better to dwell in your own circle rather than even trying to debate.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Brother you should always cite what you say. I am a Muslim from a Sunni household, but i have come away from sectarian religion. I only call myself a muslim now. Once i found out about ahlul-bayt i was annoyed at the sunni community for not talking about these amazing personalities. The only reason i pray 5 times is because of the events of Karbala. I attend majlis, listen to nohan (iranian and urdu ones) and got a good circle of Shia friends. However some things should remain factual, regarding infallibility this will need to absolutely proven. Second Abu bakr saddique RA and umar RA were not hypocrites but just had a certain way about them that some would agree/disagree with especially the latter (Umar RA). Both are buried next to the prophet saw, what a blessed honour and that wouldn't occur if they were the worst of the companions. I really do believe that a merger between the two sects will set us muslims free. Without ahlul-bayt our Islam isnt complete and without the companions (not all i agree but they are companions as a test for us to learn from) we will not attain the personality of the ahlul-bayt. Hope this message opens the eyes of people and insha'Allah make your deen strong. Ya Hussain ya Hussain ya Hussain haq haq haq.
Salaamun alaikum bro/sis. Shia & Sunni what's real ISLAM? The Muslims would not have been divided and in disagreement had it not been for the Companions, for every disagreement that has been created in the past, or is being created at the present time is due to their disagreement about the Companions. There is one God, one Qur'an, one Messenger and one Qiblah, and they all agree on that, but the disagreement among the Companions started on the first day after the death of the Messenger (saw), in the Saqifah (house) of Bani Saidah, and has continued up to the present day, and will continue for as long as Allah wills it. The main problem with all that was the Companions themselves, for they disagreed about the wish of the Messenger of Allah (saw) to write them a document which would help them to remain on the right path until the Day of Judgment. This disagreement deprived the Islamic nation of a unique virtue, and has thrown it into darkness until it was divided and plagued with internal quarrels and finally ended up as a spent force. It was they who disagreed on the issue of the Caliphate (the successorship of the Prophet), and were divided between a ruling and an opposing party, thus dividing the nation into the followers of ‘Ali and the followers of Muawiyah. It was they who differed in the interpretations of the Book of Allah and the sayings of His Messenger, which led to the creation of the various creeds, groups and subgroups; and from them came many scholars of scholastic theology and schools of thoughts and philosophies inspired by political ambitions with one aim in mind and that was to obtain power. Through my discussions with the Shiite scholars, I discovered that, in their views, the Companions were divided into three categories: The first category included the good Companions who knew Allah and His Messenger truly well, and they acclaimed him (the Messenger) to the last moments of their lives. They were truly his friends by words and deeds, and they never abandoned him, but rather stood their ground with him. Allah - the most High - praised them in many places in His Holy Book, and the Messenger of Allah (saw) also praised them in many places. This group of Companions are mentioned by the Shi’a with reverence and respect, they are also mentioned by the Sunnis with the same reverence and respect. The second category were the Companions who embraced Islam and followed the Messenger of Allah (saw) either through choice or through fear, and they always showed their gratitude to the Messenger of Allah (saw) for their Islam. However, they hurt the Messenger of Allah (saw) on a few occasions, and did not always follow his orders, in fact they often challenged him and challenged the clear text with their points of view, until Allah, through the Holy Qur'an, had to intervene by rebuking them or threatening them. Allah exposed them in many Qur'anic verses, also the Messenger of Allah (saw) warned them in many of his sayings. The Shi’a mention this group of Companions only because of their deeds, and without respect or reverence. The third type of Companions were the hypocrites who accompanied the Messenger of Allah (saw) to deceive him. They pretended to be Muslims but inside themselves they were bent on blasphemy and on deceiving Islam and the Muslims as a whole. Allah has revealed a complete Surah in the Qur'an about them, and mentioned them in many other places, and promised them the lowest level in Hell. Also the Messenger of Allah (saw) mentioned them and issued warnings about them, and even informed some of his close friends about their names and characteristics. The Shi’a and the Sunnis agree in cursing this group of Companions and have nothing to do with them. There was a special group of Companions who distinguished themselves from the others by being relatives of the Prophet (saw), in addition to having possessed ethical and spiritual virtues and personal distinctions from Allah and His Messenger that no one else was honored with. These were Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet's Family) whom Allah cleansed and purified, and ordered us to pray for them in the same way as he ordered us to pray for His Messenger. He made it obligatory for us to pay them one fifth of our income, and that every Muslim must love them as a reward for the Muhammadan Message. They are our leaders and we must obey them; and they are people firmly rooted in knowledge who know the interpretation of the Holy Qur'an and they know the decisive verses of it, as well as those verses which are allegorical. They are the people of al-Dhikr whom the Messenger of Allah equated with the Holy Qur'an in his saying "the two weighty things" (al-Thaqalayn), and ordered us to adhere to them1, He equated them to Noah's Ark: whoever joined it was saved, and whoever left it drowned2. The Companions knew the position of Ahl al-Bayt and revered them and respected them. The Shi’a follow them and put them above any of the Companions, and to support that they have many clear texts as proofs. The Sunnis respect and revere the Companions but do not accept the above classification and do not believe that some of the Companions were hypocrites; rather, they see the Companions as being the best people after the Messenger of Allah. If they classify the Companions then it would be according to their seniority and their merits and their services to Islam. They put the Rightly Guided Caliphs in the first class, then the first six of the ten who were promised with heaven, according to them. Therefore when they pray for the Prophet (saw) and his household they attach with them all the Companions without exception. This is what I know from the Sunni scholars, and that is what I heard from the Shi’i scholars regarding the classification of the Companions; and that is what made me start my detailed study with the issue of the Companions. I promised my God - if He led me on the right path - to rid myself from emotional bias and to be neutral and objective and to listen to what the two sides said, then to follow what was best, basing my conclusions on two premises: 1. A sound and a logical premise: that is to say that I would only depend upon what everybody is in agreement with, regarding the commentary on the Book of Allah, and the correct parts of the honorable Sunnah of the Prophet. 2. The mind: for it is the greatest gift that Allah has given to human beings, and through it He honored them and distinguished them from the rest of creation. Thus, when Allah protests about what His worshippers do, He asks them to use their minds in the best possible way, and He says: Do they not understand? Do they not comprehend? Do they not see? etc." Let my Islam primarily be the belief in Allah, His angels, His Books and His messengers; and that Muhammad is His servant and His Messenger; and that the Religion of Allah is Islam; and that I will never depend on any of the Companions, regardless of his relation to the Messenger or his position, for I am neither Umayyad nor Abbasid nor Fatimid, and I am neither Sunni nor Shi’i, and I have no enmity towards Abu Bakr or Umar or Uthman or ‘Ali or even Wahshi, the killer of our master al-Hamzah, as long as he became a Muslim, and the Messenger of Allah forgave him. Since I had forced myself into this study in order to reach the truth, and since I had rid myself, sincerely, from all my previous beliefs, I decided to start, with the blessing of Allah, by considering the attitudes of the Companions. For further research - click >>> www.al-islam.org/then-i-was-guided-muhammad-al-tijani-al-samawi
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
@@SH-np9vu Woe upon you ignorant muslim! Al- Sadiq, peace be on him told me that pharaoh was the first to use the word 'rafida' (apostates) for those magicians who apostatized the religion of pharaoh and obeyed Moses' orders. Then the rafidi (apostate) is he who renounces what Allah hates and does what Allah orders. Is there such a person in our present time? I am weeping over myself because I am afraid that Allah may set a seal upon my heart while I had accept this noble name (i.e. rafidi) before. So, my Lord will admonish me and say: "Ammar you renounced the false and did the obligations as He said to you." Then that will decreases my degree when He forgives me and causes a severe punishment because he discussed with me, except when the Imams guard (me) against that with their intercession. And as for my weeping over you was because you told a great lie when you called me with a name other than my name and because I felt compassion for you because of the punishment of Allah, the Exalted, when I renounce the holy names and follow the low ones. Then how will you be patient towards the torture of your world?" So, al- Sadiq, peace be on him, said: "If 'Ammar had sins greater than the skies and the earth, Allah would forgive him his sins for these words, and He would increase his rewards for them." These words, as you see, indicate his firm beliefs. Also they show that emotions did not turn him away from his thought. He had a book (a group of traditions). A group of the reliable narrators reported the book. Also a group of the Sunni great figures reported traditions on his authority. In al- Fihrast, b. al- Nadim has mentioned him and regarded him among the Shi'te jurists.
Very well put I cannot agree more w your statement.. also Allah swt already appointed a successor right at his birth Imam Ali a.s being born inside the Kaaba was the BIGGEST endorsement a man can have and to this day the crack keeps appearing as a sign of what happened at the Kaaba 🕋 also we cannot forgive those who sided with Muawiya and yazid they attacked Mecca and Medina not even 100 years after the prophet (saw) passed away 😢 how can one not see the difference
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
my brought up has been from a sunni family but my parents have always preffered love for Ahlul bait more than anything else, my question is that if Abu Bakr and Umar were hypocrites why did Imam Ali A.S did not raise his sword against them. i was told through out my childhood that. Ali's sword will never rise for any injustice.
@@mrhk6470 The reason for that according to Shia Hadith sources is that Imam Ali عليه السلام did not have enough loyal, brave men with him. Many prophets and successors did not rise against the tyrants of their time for the same reason.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933. Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]" Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah, written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
@@mohammedal-nidawi8896 i cannot believe that how have we been brainwashed about tge history. we even see in movies that Prophet SAW his uncle Hamza A.S and his progeny Ahlul Bait were the ones sacrificing everthing and Abu Bakr and Umar are found nowhere but they did convert to islam before the conquet of Makkah lot of confusion after conquest and everything after.
can you tell with authenticity the status of Abu sufiyan and muavia and marwan at the time of abu bakr and umar. i know what was happening at the time of usman. i feel that there was corruption after the conquest because of all the fogy infirmation completely discarding Ali A.S and bringing forth Abu bakr Umar and Usman. Prophet SAW said that narrated by Ume Salma R.A that " Ali is with tge Quran and Quran is with Ali they will stay together until the day of reckoning until they come to me at Kausar"
The enemy of Islam wants us devide and fight each other, whoever doesn’t understand this agenda of the enemy and promote split and hate between Shia and Sunni is working for the enemy. Period.
You are victim to a double bluff. If you think that peace and prosperity is in our personal hands, you’re mistaken. There is precisely one thing and one thing alone that will save mankind, and that is the upright religion His prophets came with. It would be best you align with the movement that aims to revive this upright religion, Shia Islam.
Doing Takfir on prominent figures of other sects will provoke hatred, can't you see this? Had you pay heed to contemporary scholars you would understand this.
@@Echoes_of_Justiceso what if it provokes hatred? islam is a religion that teaches us the difference between right and wrong. the world may criticise the shia today, but atleast we dont praise the killers of the ahlybat as
Well done!! one most compelling argument that could possibly be added to a later video, an argument from logic. Do you believe in a god that would leave the world devoid of his guidance? God has seen how time and time again the clerics of religion have misguided the people after the demise of the prophet or successor, would such a god be called wise if his modus operandi was to leave the nation in the hands of those very clerics without any guidance from himself and then issue a statement saying I have perfected for you your religion? Furthermore would such a god be deserving of the titles "just" and "wise"?
If, after the Prophet, the community had followed his instructions, the atrocities committed during the conquests of other nations wouldn't have occurred. Islam would have spread through hearts instead of by the sword, bloodshed, and crime. These conquests, which are a disgrace to Islam and are celebrated by the Sunnis, would not have taken place. According to which Islamic and Quranic teachings were the massacres and violations by Umar ibn al-Khattab's army in Iran justified?
respectfully, When I was deciding whether to joining the Islam of the Sunnah or Islam of the Shiatul Ali, one thing that made me make my decision was the fact that according to the Shias, Ali got beaten by two old men and then those old men hurt his wife which lead to her miscarrige and eventual death and somehow a year later Ali went to go work for both men for a number of years as an advisor. If you really think that the man who lifted the Gate of Khaybar was too week to defend himself and his wife against two old men, then I'm sorry but Ali didn't deserve to be Khalifa. But then again, You also cannot find a single hadith in any shia books whether the Prophet PBUH praised Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid, or Amr and so many more even though they were close to the Prophet. this shows a clear bias in the Shia group to disregard any companion who did not agree with their false narrative regardless of how beloved they were to Muhammad PBUH.
You can find a hadith about the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him and his family telling Muawiya in Sunni books that may Allah not fill your stomach lol
This is interesting, because as a Shia I’ve never heard until reading this that the imam got ‘beaten up’ before they killed his wife - I’m pretty sure imam ali wasn’t in the house when his wife died
Imam Ali (as) choke slammed umar Why do Sunnis attribute patients of the imam (as) to be a vice but to uthman as a virtue Uthman had his wife groped infront of him and was silent The will of the Nabi (pbuh) was for the Imam (as) to have patients and this he showed it perfectly The Nabi (pbuh) was stoned by the pagans of Mecca and he did not retaliate even though Allah (swt) was by his side You logic is very flawed in this approach and clearly you only followed the Sunni narrative instead of seeking truth Imam Ali (as) talks about his in a sermon in naghal balagha He also said with his hand on the throat of umar that is it was not for the will of the Prophet (pbuh) he would have killed every person that attacked the house and that if they return he would do just that Thus the hypocrites did not return to the holy house As for why he was an advisor (did not work for them) to the Muslims it is the position of an Imam to do just that to help the Muslim ummah from dying even though it was going astray he did his duties I advise you to look into Shia theology and make your choice not just into the flawed Sunni theology and why they falsely claim about Shia faith
@@hussienalaouie3147 Sir with all due respect. The last thing that truly made me to decide which denomination of Islam to accept was when I was researching Imam Jaafar AS and read his own words in Shia books regarding Shia Hadith Narrators. Imam Jaafar AS himself called the Shia narrators as Liars, Fabricators, and asked Allah to curse them for attributing lies in his name. And that was from Shia books, not Sunni books. How do you expect me to believe in an Ideology whose own highest and most revered scholar cursed the Shia Hadith Narrators like Zurarah ibn Ayan, Jabir bin Yazid Al-Joufy, Muhammad ibn Muslim, Abu Basir al-Muradi, Al-Mufaddal ibn ‘Umar (he was called a Kafir by Imam Jaafar) etc. I can go on and on and provide you evidence for every single claim that I made. When your own Imam half cursed these people who have narrated 99% of your Hadiths, then how do you expect me to follow your theology??????
@@SuperAltamish23 are you also going to provide the context of those Hadiths where anyone who was to praise the imam (as) was slaughtered and killed by the cursed ummayid regime you people hold so high Are you also going to show the Hadiths that praise those individuals and show that the answer the Imam (as) gave was dependent on the person who asked for the purpose of saving the lives of his companions Sunnis love the half truths and neglecting what has happened in history to push their fantasy narrative Again if you you’re going to use something as an excuse for your delusional theology use a better one Here is a real reason to be Shia Mubaghala, Hadith thuqulain, ghadeer khom, khaybar, Hadith of the first revaluation Those are all proofs of the wilayah of Imam Ali (as) can you do one hadith at the time of the Nabi (pbuh) that can even suggest Abu bakar as worthy of that position And remember things that happen during the time of the Nabi (pbuh) are usoul al deen so you cannot be Muslim without them
Its ironical that people claim prophet left nation without a successor indirectly putting blame on prrophet for the chios this is disrespectful, how come a man of noble presence who bulit a state so perfectly and ended up in throwing it into chaois ......these.people are no less than than those who opposed prophet during his times infact people are following those who hijacked islam
Salaam, Great presentation. Thank you. As the holy Quran said people follow the path of their fathers [tradition] when invited to the right path (Quran 31:21). Muslims generally do the same thing. They totally ignore the commandments to use intellect (اکثرهم لا بعقلون). That’s the problem!
As a muslim our true guidance will be the life of the prophet and the word of Allah ( the quran). The shia/sunni divide is polital not religious. Allah saw, says in the quran - this day i have completed your religion, so islam was complete. We as muslims are supposed to see beyond the political divide ands recognize that we have more in common than differences. A couple of points for further analysis why didnt the sunnis and shias merge when hazrat Ali became the caliph, also why would hazrat Ali allow one hie daughter to marry hazrat Umar? We shouldnt refrain from criticizing the companion's of the prophet, they were part of the prophets circle because they were meant to be there, if one of them was a traitor or power hungry individual, dont you think that the prophet would have known. Finally, the prophet left no successor because it was test of those left behind to choose unity rather than divide, they failed at that task. On a side note, regarding the paper and pen incident, theres no telling what prophet wanted written down, you cant make assumptions that it was the name of a successor
If Iblis was going to a traitor don't you think Allah (swt) would have known? If Nabi Nuh's wife and son would have disobeyed him, don't you think he would've known? If Nabi Yaqub son, Nabi Yusuf, was going to be thrown in a well by his brother, you don't think he would've known?... I can keep going. Your argument is weak.
Are you seriously unaware of the event of Ghadir Khumm? Maybe research the tafsir of Quran 26:214. The Hadith of the warning. Rasulullah pbuh&hf blatantly named his successor on multiple occasions.
Imama Jaafar AS cursed Shia Hadith Narrators and called them liars and fabricators in Shia books. Jabir bin Yazid Al-Joufy he met Imam Baqir (rah) only once and never met Imam Jafar (rah) "I asked Abu Abdullah (as) about the hadiths of Jabir Al-Jafy, he replied: I saw him only once with my father and he never met me". [Rijal Kashi p:191] Zurarah ibn Ayan al-Kashshi records that Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq cursed Zurarah. The following quotation is but one of several places where his cursing of Zurarah is on record: "By Allah, he has ascribed lies to me! By Allah, he has ascribed lies to me! By Allah, he has ascribed lies to me! May Allah curse Zurarah! May Allah curse Zurarah! May Allah curse Zurarah!" (Ikhtiyar Ma‘`rifat ar-Rijal, vol. 1 p. 361) Muhammad ibn Muslim He claims to have heard 30 000 ahadith from Imam Muhammad al-Baqir, and a further 16 000 from his son Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq (See Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat ar-Rijal vol. 1 p. 391) is also recorded by al-Kashshi to have been cursed by Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq (vol. 1 p. 394). Abu Basir al-Muradi "Abu ‘Abdillah (Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq) used to get annoyed and upset with his presence, and his companions are in disagreement amongst themselves about him. (Ikhtiyar Ma‘`rifat ar-Rijal, vol. 1 p. 397. See also al-Ardabili, Jami‘ ar-Ruwat vol. 3 p. 43) Al-Mufaddal ibn ‘Umar Imam Ja‘far is recorded by al-Kashshi to have addressed by calling him, “You Kafir! You Mushrik!” (See Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat ar-Rijal vol. 2 p. 612) Another lengthier narration of al-Kashshi runs as follows: ‘Abdullah ibn Miskan says: Hujr ibn Za’idah and ‘Amir ibn Judha‘ah al-Azdi came to Abu ‘Abdillah [imam Ja‘far] and told him: “May we be ransomed for you! Mufaddal says that you [the Imams] determine the sustenance of the people.” He [imam Ja‘far said]: “By Allah, no one besides Allah determines our sustenance. One day I needed food for my family. I was under difficult circumstances and thought hard about it, until I managed to secure food for them. Only then did I feel content. May Allah curse him and disown him.” They asked: “Do you curse and disown him?” He replied: “Yes, so you too, curse him and disown him. May Allah and His messenger disown him.” (Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat ar-Rijal vol. 2 p. 614) NOW IF YOU CLAIM THAT IMAM JAAFAR AS WAS DOING TAQIYAH. THEN YOU ALSO HAVE TO ADMIT THAT IMAM AHMED IBN HAMBAL HAD MORE COURAGE AND RESILIENCE THAN IMAM JAAFAR AS DUE TO IMAM AHMED ACCEPTING PRISON AND TORTURE EVERY DAY FOR 2.5 YEARS RATHER THAN RENOUNCING HIS AQEEDAH OR SAYING LIES TO GET RELEASED.
Most of the Muslims division is caused by the Hadiths. We totally abandoned the Quran and followed man made teaching. These Hadiths weren't teaching Prophet Muhammad, but the day we will stand in front of Allah, we will know reality
The shia has it Wright hundred per cent because of this fallacy they claim SAW as being a human being as anyone which is a monstrus lye but you still have to tell us the complexion of the True successor Ameer Al Momineen Seydina Ali AS You portrayed Umar and Aboubacar as black in the movie Lady of Heavens what about Ameer Al Momineen AS please answer thanks
So true. I hate that. They're all from Quraysh but the evil ones have to be portrayed has black and the Prophet (pbuh&hf) and his family are fair skinned. I refuse to watch strictly based on that BS.
Allah and his Prophet PBUH didn't know that there would be a divide in Ummah on the successor of the Prophet PBUH still they didn't choose a successor .....n still Allah said in Quran that he has completed this religion what kind of completion is this that the Ummah divided on a very next day 😂😂
I don't believe that the sahaba were evil hypocrites. I just think they were ignorant. To ignore such a haderth at gadeer khum. Immam Ali (as) was definitely chosen by the Prophet to be successor.
This is against what the Imams (peace be upon them) said and is not what we find in the books of classical Shia scholars such as Sheikh al-Saduq and Sheikh al-Mufid. This is the belief of the Batri sect.
The prophet SAW. Did not mention who will be the first muslim caliph but he did by example when he was very sick on his last days he the prophet let Abuse Bakr to lead the muslims in prayer.
If we take you for your word then why did Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) say in Hasan Hadith that Khilafa will be for 30 years then there will be kingship. By that account the 30 year Khilafa will be at Haq. If Ali (AS) was the only true successor why didn't Prophet (PBUH) say true Khilafa will be only the time span when Ali (AS) was Khalifa? And this Hadith is Hasan btw. Sahih and Hasan Hadith are authentic. The Prophet (PBUH) never lied sir.
Would you be so kind to share who exactly shared that Hadith? Also ain't the people from same people who tried to hide the original Hadith from the from Prophet (Peace be upon them) that I an leaving Quran and Aly ul bait as for the ummah to follow to remain on the true guided path? Or did you not read tge Hadith of Ghadir where all 100,000+ accepted bait for Hazrat Ali as when Prophet(Peace be upon Him) guess what you never did because you are too busy in reading the falsely created Ahadiths created by so called Caliphs and their followers
It's really funny the small things you put in the video to indicate where you stand like always saying "so-called sunni" and putting ❌️s on sunni claims and ✔️ on shia claims 😂 Really great video may Allah reward you inshallah
@@g7dsent666 The prophet didn’t trust any of these people. If he did, why would he ask them to taste the “medicine” that was administered to him ? Why would he prder them to all leave Medina on his death bed? Think about it. Plus, prophets have always been surrounded by traitors who claimed to be believers. Jesus himself was betrayed by one of his so called disciples: Judas. Our Judas or Judas’s are Omar, Abu Bakr, Aisha and Hafsa. Need I say more?
It is a test to see who really is faithful and who is a hypocrite, and umar w abu bakr LA failed the test and so is everyone who follows them. just like Lut's wife and Moses's wife they were not good people. so your comment is invalid. Try again lol
@@ertugrulsulaimanshah4236So our Prophet appointed by God was not able to put forth a leader that was ordained by god ? 2-3 hypocrites were able to stop Allah SWT ? This is essentially what you are saying. Sure Judas might have betrayed Isa AH but was not successful according to us. If you’re christian……. sure he was successful in having God crucified. One thing is to have hypocrites and liars around you and one thing to have them at the forefront and to marry one. Are you saying our Prophet would live with a woman that is a hypocrite?
Shia muslim don't believe Ahlulbaith are like Prophet Muhammad..!! Prophethood end with Muhammad saww and Ahlulbaith are thier khalifa or Wali ..!! just like Ale Ibrahim are khalifa or Imam of Ibrahim as.
@@KnowerofThings The prophet was sent to all people and logically, more so to the sinners and disbelievers than those who already believed in Allah. Hence the inevitable gathering of traitors. Those who claimed to believe but then reneged on their vows did so at their own peril. That does not put into question the Prophets infallibility but puts into question the ulterior motives of the characters who claimed to be muslim but later betrayed the Prophet.
If Iblis was going to be a traitor don't you think Allah (swt) would have known? If Nabi Nuh's wife and son would have disobeyed him, don't you think he would've known? If Nabi Yaqub son, Nabi Yusuf, was going to be thrown in a well by his brother, you don't think he would've known?... I can keep going. Your argument is weak.
@@COPSCheckingOurPublicServants Yes Allah knew ofcourse what these characters were going to do, Iblis or anybody else for that matter, because we as muslims believe He is all knowing. Not sure what is your point. If you’re referring to the notion that Allah should have stopped it, on the contrary. Allah tells us in the quran that prophets will have enemies from amongst their wives and children, and so will regular people. That is by design, not coincidence. Altagahbun 64/14 Alanam 6/112
@@ertugrulsulaimanshah4236 yes that’s my point. Pointing out that his argument of Why the Prophet (sawa) would have these people around him if they going to betray him didn’t make sense.
His job was complete to deliver the quran and give his teachings. Any successor would just be a plain human made into a king/pope like person . There is no reason to have one.
So you know better than Allah (swt)? Are you really unaware of the event of Ghadir Khumm? Or read the tafsirs of Quran 26:214, Hadith of the warning. Allah (swt) made Rasulullah (pbuh&hf) declare his successor JUST AS EVERY PROPHET BEFORE HIM DID.
lol outlining history at this point without hard evidence is just pointless. Just distancing from the truth of sticks who follows the book and the prophet as much as clear which it is thanks to Allah
I have to ask you mention alpt about the corruption of sunni islam Let's say this is true and this cycle you have laid out is accurate Csn you then substantiate the claims found within shia islam and it's imams For refenrce I do not know what they would be I'm just wondering how do you know that what you follow is accurate someone else being wrong doesent male you right (not saying you've said this I'm just making a general point )
Why increase the sectarian discourse finally ali ra was also made caliph and what has happened and happened things happened cant be changed we dont have time machine stop this division in a name a unchangeable past .
@@faizanahmed8067 One should always seek the truth. That’s why in school we have a subject called history to understand what happened in the past and learn from it. Can we say that we don’t want to hear about the bad Nazis because it causes discord with the German people?
There's plenty of evidence in just the Sunni books that paints this exact truthful picture. Once you understand the hatred many people had towards the prophet's family you will begin to question many so-called sahi hadiths. There's plenty of information available online. If you really want to know the sources you can DM me.
I started watching this video so curious and excited to finally understand the topic.... Instead its a hateful onesided very biased and dishonest look of history.
According to all Shia sects, when Allah was revealing verses 33:6, 9:100, 48:29, and 59:8-9, Allah did not know in advance that Aisha (r.a.) would battle against Ali (r.a.) or that many companions would become disbelievers or hypocrites. That is why, they argue, Allah did not exclude them from these verses. Therefore, they have no doubts that these companions should be considered hypocrites. Astagfirullah
The fact your all praising this man shows me shia really hate the sahaba...while imam ali never acted like you people even if he disagreed with them on things
you are wong actually. In Saheeh bukhari and muslim he called them "traitors, thieves, sinners and Liers" also he didn't give his bay'a until Six months later from the death of the profit ! (according to you books)
@ferassalah9695 the same way imam ali a.s acted in history is how shia should act I don't need a cleric to tell me to curse people when I see and have Imam ali as an example to follow
Abbasids the stone idolator is the originator of the religion of islam, a veil to keep and promote the stone idolising. In the start it's the stone in the end it's the stone.
The main reason the “Sunni” term was coined is because in the early years of Islam after the prophets death, the people of Sunnah were those that relied on Ahadeeth transmitted by reliable asaneed to contextualise and understand the deen. This differentiated people from Ahlul Bidaa’ or those that rejected or down right falsified their chains of transmission. Shiaa Islam relies on pigeon hole'd readings, shock value and outright lack of reliable chains of transmission in their books of narrations. That is why the sects within Shiaa Islam differ wildly in the amount of Imaams, the divinity and their general ‘aqeedah of the conception of these Imaams and Allah. I mean if it is such a core component of salvation, and yet you can't decide how many Imaams there are and what powers they posess? The suggestion that that the understanding of Islam is only contextualised by blood, is illogical as humans rely on reports and transmission. For companions in general to be around the prophet, and observe his sayings, decisions, overt and tacit approvals and then not transmit is absurd. It is a proven fact ahlul bayt were not always around when things happened around the prophet, and unless the shiaa are willing to ascribe divinity or supernatural powers to them, as they do their Imaams, it is clear Sunni islam can be repeatedly tested with their academic corpus to prove their positions come from sound, replicate-able evidences backed by sound chains of transmission. The fact that tertiary transmissions of the Prophets actions, words, approvals is so crucial is because it contextualises and gives credence to Islam, of which the Quran will not give. This is evidenced, by the Shiaa attempt to create their own corpus of narrations, of which in the early years you'll find Sunnis creating an unbiased science of verification and transmission to really sift out reliable and unreliable reports, and the shiaa focussed on books of history which press their claims which have no reliable and traceable chains of narration. Finally when they did come with their books of reports it was full of defects in the wordings and their chains never held of to proper scrutiny from the scholars of Jarh wa ta'deel, something which vastly remains unexplored in the Shiaa tradition. So yes, it is a political disagreement amongst the Sahabah that turned into a fitna, and the people of misguidance used that to wedge further divides.
I didn’t read all of that, but I got the general idea. Do you think your points are good enough for someone like Dr. Yasir Qadhi for example to use in a lecture, or that would end their whole career?
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 YQ has struggled and grappled with modernity ever since he left Saudi. His career ended the day he decided to veer into topics that weren't his specialty 🤷🏾 Although, i'm sure you'll find him a welcome guest if you ever wanted to discuss Al-Radhi's non existent chains of narration in Nahj Al-Balagha. 7 generations between Ali ibn Abi Talib رضي الله عنه and Al-Radhi, but he seems to have time travelled and become the primary source somehow.
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 They wouldnt need to because I'm paraphrasing Al-Dhahabi and Ibn Abdil Barr from within the academic tradition. Incidentally, the same people YQ would need to resort to 😂 Dw I won't make the claim that YQ would time travel to primary sources.
@@tonymontana24596 Great, paraphrasing al-Dhahabi who evaluates hadiths based on his “heart” and uses his oath as an argument. Again, you can paraphrase him here as much as you want, it won’t do much damage to your religion. A quick look at these two PhD theses from your Saudi and Qatar universities is enough to show the reality of the cesspool your “academic tradition” is; PhD degrees being given for indoctrination sermons, ١- أثر التشيع على الروايات التاريخية في القرن الأول الهجري - عبد العزيز محمد نور ولي ٢- تحقيق مواقف الصحابة في الفتنة من روايات الإمام الطبري والمحدثين - محمد أمحزون Good luck shifting the focus to Nahj al-Balaghah
I've outlined eight differences as an introduction to those less aware. Would more detailed videos evidencing these differences be useful?
Always cite your readings. That way they can be verified.
Thank you for your efforts akhi, the more information is always the better!! Especially simplified
You planted the seed, the rest is upon them. Continue doing what you do perfection at its finest!
Keep at it. The style is refreshing, original but accurate.
Whats left is we need to clock up more views among shias and non shia alike.
Malik, please do a series about the Ahl al-Kisa.
No one has explained the differences between Shia and sunni better than he has. This is the channel that deserves millions of subscribers. Sadly all the reverts go to Asim Hakeem and consume a bunch of nonsense.
“Next thing you know a two year old is leading you in salat” -asim Hakeem 😅
The Wahhabis have pumped hundreds of millions of dollars to cause further divisions and hatred
Nope, He misrepresented the Sunni perspective by supporting his rafidhi narratives. He misquotes our points and doesn’t tell our proper history. Read the texts to understand the truth. These rafidhis will always lie upon our name and would mislead you. He cunningly says Companions in Sunnis weren't ahl al bayt indirectly while separating ahl al bayt from companions in his religion. If you study the sunni books, the so called Shia Imams start to feel like Sunnis since we have quotes from them. We also have quotes saying they were lied about by misguided people. We have different versions of Ahl Al Bayt in Sunni and Shias. Never learn through yt videos of people of the claim isn't backed by a proper source.
(The companions include Ahl Al Bayt as well but not all of them are ahl al bayt)
@venawmz496 there's only one ahl al hayet in the tut-heer Aya in the Quran. it's even in your books. go read hadith Al Kisa
@@wazzabanzook5028 you don't know the context. I won't bother explaining since after every few replies I get dragged into a comment section debate. You're just trying to fit your own narrative by cherry picking our sources. These claims have already been debunked several times by our scholars. Kindly go and study them instead of listening from weirdos in debates. Check textual evidences. That's all I would say, even if I got the answers I won't answer you because what you desire is something only you can understand through studying, study it instead of wasting time by watching debates where half the times there are baseless claims or lies. 👍 may Allah guide you
It’s interesting when you see that none of the Sunni leaders or countries have raised one single weapon against Israel in defence of the Palestinians and only the Shia have, I see this as a clear sign from Allah that who is the guided and who is the hypocrite. Because in the Quran it is mentioned that the hypocrites sit with the sitters and never go to war against the enemies of Islam. Well we are seeing this in front of our own eyes as a sign. And Allah knows best
Thats neither here nor there. Iran has butchered hundreds of thousands of Sunnis via their proxies in Syria and Iraq.
Be careful friend….with a comment like that you will be accused of believing your lying eyes!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@wazzabanzook5028
Did you even read my comment carefully??
Do you know what sarcasm is?
Do you understand the meaning of “your lying eyes”?
And what’s up with “cowboy”? …..???
If you can’t comprehend sarcasm when people agree with you….maybe you shouldn’t be commenting on issues🤷♂️🤷♂️🤷♂️
@@wowtubeyou sorry akhi, il remove my comment, no I didn't read yours properly I was getting some groceries
We are learning from you in Indonesia, keep up the good job and thank you, our teacher. We converted to Shiite from Sunni about 5 years ago
The six difference really strongly resonates with me. It’s all the great companions are so blameless and praise worthy as the Sunni like to claim, why therefore, can’t we study and scrutinize them, won’t we be instead, inspired and well guided, rather than confused or misdirected if we do if they are such good examples? Anyone who wants to you believe something sight unseen, proof ungiven, details unverified, questions unwelcome, is hiding something.
alhumdulillah Allah showed me the right path true Islam shia
You speak very beautifully
As a Shia myself I thank you for explaining our point of view very clearly and on point
My Allah guide you and your viewers to the truth
may*
I hate mistakes!!!!
Malik, I have no words. Even emojis fail me.
10/10
He talks in a sophisticated manner lol to confuse the average listener into believing he’s smart. Let’s test this and break down the belief system of the Shia, muta, beating themselves, taqqiya 24/7, hatred for the sahaba and wives of prophet, siding with non Muslims against wars with Muslims for eg Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria in modern times, and the biggest sin idolatry
the moment u look at that thmnail.... u know he got the salafi wahabi schlokar pic and he is talking about shia vs sunni so he will be 1 trillion percent wrong and i cant take this seriously..... first u need to know the diff btw sunni and wahabi to progress further and takl about ismaili, shia and sufis... ignortant and he is wrong
@@flag_bearertruth6257
Attention to detail brother. He put 'Sunni' in inverted commas. The Shia are the real AhlulSunna.
The entirity of those who follow Abu Bakr ibn Abi Quharafa are misguided.
@@GatekeeperOfTruth i agree with you. we believe abu bakr is not far from phorah , what he did in saqifa. but what ia m most people dont understand who is salafi -wahabi . khwariji, nasibi and ahle sunnah. the uploader put wahabi scholar picture and in the title, he said, sunnah which is a blatant mistake.
The prophet(saws) also named Ali (as) as his wali & vizer at the beginning of his mission,.. 🎉
The First invitation of Islam:
The feast of "Dawat Dhul-'Asheera" at which Muhammad(saww), the Apostle of God, designated Ali ibn Abi Talib, as his successor, is a historical event, and its authenticity has been affirmed, among others, by the following Arab historians:
1. Tabari, History, Vol. II,p. 217
2. Kamil ibn Atheer, History, Vol. II, p. 22
3. Abul Fida,History, Vol. I, p. 116
@@alibangash5775 thank you 🫡
May Allah (s.w.t.) Bless You. And, THAT'S THE TRUTH.
Man kunto Moula fahaza Ali (a.s) Moula ❤
This division would not have occurred if we would have listened to the prophet when he appointed Ali as his successor.
But no. Everyone was fighting for the thrown.
I always wished someone would come and explain the shia perpective which is extremely important for the faith ,it is really necessary to point out that its not just a political dispute
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Great video. The fact that Abu Baker outlawed the circulation, documentation and narration of Ahadith for a 100 years, to me is a HUGE tell. I wish you had mentioned it. Again, great video, which I’ve saved.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
I never new you had your personal UA-cam channel mehn this is great have been waiting just to see your videos in rafida plus
Am a new Shi'a convert and I am very excited about this deep analogy that you bring it
Please keep on creating such high quality content regardless if you have many or few viewers we highly appreciate may Allah accept your good deeds
Welcome to the religion of truth, the purest path to God. You are truly one of the richest men on earth
@@arkofsalvation1 thanks brother
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Malik please keep doing more content no matter if you have very few views, truth never needs widespread preaching it moves on its own pace and the way you are doing this job is phenomenal ❤.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Connecting dot, Hadith Qirtas:
Translation] [Hazrat Ibn Abbas(ra) narrated “When the ailment of the Prophet(saww) became worse, he said, ‘Bring for me (writing) paper and I will write for you a statement after which you will not go astray.’ But Umar said, ‘The Prophet is seriously ill, and we have got Allah’s Book with us and that is sufficient for us.’ But the companions of the Prophet(saww) differed about this and there was a hue and cry.
On that, the Prophet(saww) said to them, ‘Get up (and leave me alone). It is not right that you should quarrel in front of me.”] (Sahih al-Bukhari)
Thank God I was born a Muslim who follows the path of the prophet and his family peace be upon them
Why did it take me so long to find this channel? My brother may Allah swt bless you beyond your comprehension in both worlds, for being open-minded on this topic.
I stopped debating people about this very crucial topic because everyone is with the assumption that all the companions are rightly guided and saved by Allah irrespective of their shortcomings.
Hence nobody wants to touch this topic and until the ummah wake up to the reality of circumstances that led to the Shia-Sunni division, Muslims will continue to slaughter themselves.
It saddens me so much when others pretend to be in the middle by saying they’re just “Muslims”. Is their salat, fasting, beliefs, practices etc the Sunni way or the Shia way? Both ways cannot be true. Only one has. Which of the ways was taught by the prophet (saww)?
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
The Sunni view of leadership ends up with a disaster by design
A. You have Shura people get a good leader
B. You have a Shura people pick a bad leader
C. You have a military takeover and a good leader emerges
D. You have a military takeover and a bad leader emerges
E. Good leader arranges a Shura which is 50-50%
F. Good leader hands over to relative or trusted vizier and again it’s a toss up
Every change of power is a coin flip. Even if the Muslims get a good leader takes power there nothing to prevent an evil military strongman from removing him and you have to start from scratch again.
Very well put
Yes indeed and another thing Sunni claims that Abubakr became the leader of the Muslims by shura ( voting ) but at the same time Umar was not voted by the Muslims he was APOINTED by Abubakr before his death and that’s a contradiction of how the sunnis see the succession process and another thing is how did Abubakr apointe a successor and the Prophet himself didn’t ??? Like some people don’t understand how silly this is a prophet chosen from Allah don’t lead his people to the right path and leaves them to decide on their own ???
@@H00H-H00H there is a verse in the Bible For “God is not a God of confusion but of peace” in the Quran there is a verse “Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.”
The question would be to Sunnis what other system designed by God is this chaotic?
Imagine if Salat were sometimes Magrib is 1 rakat other times it’s 5 who knows what in the mystery box at the masjid?
Even so called Sunnis are Shia. They are Shia of Umar and Abu Baker.
thank you for pointing that out... funny that most do not know
@@salimsopari Thank you. Sunnism (Umarism) is appealing to street level and low IQ talking points and deception through words such as Sunni. The brand creates such a false impression as if these guys are the only people who follow the Sunna and everyone else ignores it.
No we're not. We don't venerate those two
@@luciansilver4113you more than venerate, who are you kidding
@@luciansilver4113 God damn both of them then. They are in hell. Am I out of Islam for that? It is funny that nothing makes you angrier than saying anything slightly bad about these two guys and yet you are not venerating them.
It’s a mistake to assume the division happened after the prophet died. The division was there from the beginning especially within the first years of Islam. This has been clearly and unmistakably captured by the Quran in many, many verses. Indeed, the exact same division existed in every prophet’s community. This is the way Allah wanted it.
Could you please elaborate. And point me to some references. Thanks.
@@nycguycpt Allah must test the community through something difficult for the people to accept or follow. Otherwise what’s the point if everyone is equal in virtue which they will all appear to be in the absence of a test. This theme is mentioned numerous times in the Quran.
@@quranjadeed We don't have the feature of commenting with photos here unfortunately, but I do have the screenshot of you saying the Quran is corrupted saved. Stay away from us Rafida and say what you want.
Bro you will be viral soon, keep posting
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
May Allah bless you Malik, keep these videos coming they're very informative and eye-opening !
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Excellent job brother ,may Allah bless you and your family.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
اللهم صل على محمد وال محمد
The production level is amazing. I used to be a "sunni". Now wouldn't claim to be shia or sunni, but I am way more sympathetic to the shia views. My humble advice is if you point out how the sources of sunni islam are biased (Abu Hurayrah and Aisha: in Bukhari) and make people more aware of the battle of the camel which is never spoken about by sunnis, a lot of "sunnis" will see the shia view and it de-radicalises extremists and ideologues on top of that.
If the people were to choose a leader, they certainly wouldn't have selected Muhammad ﷺ. Abu Sufyan had more leadership qualities and capabilities than others to become the leader. However, after the Sunnis accepted God's choice, they suddenly shifted and decided that they should choose their leader themselves, mixing divine decree with earthly decision. Additionally, the idea that the Prophet would leave the community without a successor is an insult to his wisdom, intelligence, and political acumen.
@@1364FILM Isn't what you said in the beginning about Abu Sufyan being more qualified an insult to the Prophet's (صلى الله عليه وآله) wisdom, intelligence and political acumen? What's wrong with you?
@@MohammedAbdul-Hameed You don't understand correctly! If becoming a prophet was based on earthly criteria, Abu Sufyan would certainly have been superior to Muhammad! He had wealth, was older, and was a leader of Mecca! Muhammad was a simple shepherd who worked for Khadijah! But God knew better and chose Mohammad ﷺ ! This is not insulting , insulting is when you picked Abu Baker just because he was older and ignored Mohammad ﷺ command
@@1364FILM That's a more appropriate way to put it, although even by human standards the Prophet (صلى الله عليه وآله) was the noblest, most honest and trustworthy man. The pagans of Mecca were ready to make him their king on the condition that he stops insulting their idols.
i would say that Ghadeer e Khum was one the most important events in islamic history
What an outstanding episode we miss you brother ❤
Excellent video may Allah bless you brother.
Great Content. Keep up the Good work brother.
If this video was to be described in one word, it’d be “Truth.”
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Appreciated your great efforts, waiting for series videos.
Thank you for sharing your knowledge, Brother Malik. I am learning so much about Islamic history from your content. I still have much to learn and understand, and one matter that confuses me is the role of Imam Ali (a.s) as a caliph. What does it mean that he became a caliph, and why didn't Muslims come together during his caliphate?
The Jews did not follow the Caliph after Moses, who was Aaron as brothers, and the Messiah did not follow the Caliph who was installed by Jesus, who was Barnabas. Or Shamoun Al-Safa Muslims followed the biography of the first ones and did not follow the Caliph the position which is Imam Ali was appointed by the Prophet Mohamed by Allah in the pledge of allegiance to Alghadeer because he killed the Unbelievers of their people and that is why they hate him The Qur'an said to you Allah and his messenger and those who believe who perform prayer and pay Zakat while kneeling This verse was revealed by Imam Ali and it is an explicit verse that proves the caliphate to Ali and the Quran said and Mohamed is only a messenger that the messengers have been abandoned before him If he dies or is killed you will turn on your heels The Sunnah follows Who overturned after k-illing the raw and burned the house of the daughter of the raw because she did not pledge allegiance to them and the captivity of the women of the raw and ki-lled his grandchildren
being caliph in the Islamic sense is being the representative of Allah on earth as the prophet was, it's not just a political position, within muslims their are the good the bad and the out right hypo,crites just look at the muslims today most look at their brothers in Palestine and just don't care and some conspire against them, only few who are truthful
Caliph means successor. Muslims should have paid their allegiance to Imam Ali (peace be upon him) since day one after the Prophet’s martyrdom (صلى الله عليه وآله). This title (Caliph) has been hijacked and given to hyp,ocrits who climbed to the position of power through plots, schemes and viol,nc. The corruption started by the first three ‘Caliphs’ encouraged other greedy companions to go after power and wealth, and opened the door for rebellion against Imam Ali (peace be upon him).
@shlibak , could you make a video of other differences between Shia and Sunni. Thank you for this informative video.
Lady of heaven is banned here in Pakistan, please share any link where we can watch it thanks
You can watch on google even in pakistan I watched it
@johnabbascheema you mean Google drive ?
@@ashiqhussain6956 no google chrome write there search option name of movie
Tubi app with vpn
Watch on tubi (it is available there)
That's more like it. Being a Sunni, I have always said there is no Union between Shia and Sunni. They are two completely different religions working on different ideology who have no congruency between them. Any attempt of joining them and false brotherhood is nothing but a pipedream. It is better to dwell in your own circle rather than even trying to debate.
We’ll destroy you in debate. So yes, run and hide in your own circles.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Brother you should always cite what you say. I am a Muslim from a Sunni household, but i have come away from sectarian religion. I only call myself a muslim now. Once i found out about ahlul-bayt i was annoyed at the sunni community for not talking about these amazing personalities. The only reason i pray 5 times is because of the events of Karbala. I attend majlis, listen to nohan (iranian and urdu ones) and got a good circle of Shia friends. However some things should remain factual, regarding infallibility this will need to absolutely proven. Second Abu bakr saddique RA and umar RA were not hypocrites but just had a certain way about them that some would agree/disagree with especially the latter (Umar RA). Both are buried next to the prophet saw, what a blessed honour and that wouldn't occur if they were the worst of the companions. I really do believe that a merger between the two sects will set us muslims free. Without ahlul-bayt our Islam isnt complete and without the companions (not all i agree but they are companions as a test for us to learn from) we will not attain the personality of the ahlul-bayt.
Hope this message opens the eyes of people and insha'Allah make your deen strong.
Ya Hussain ya Hussain ya Hussain haq haq haq.
Ya Zahra
Thank you for this
Salaamun alaikum bro/sis.
Shia & Sunni what's real ISLAM?
The Muslims would not have been divided and in disagreement had it not been for the Companions, for every disagreement that has been created in the past, or is being created at the present time is due to their disagreement about the Companions. There is one God, one Qur'an, one Messenger and one Qiblah, and they all agree on that, but the disagreement among the Companions started on the first day after the death of the Messenger (saw), in the Saqifah (house) of Bani Saidah, and has continued up to the present day, and will continue for as long as Allah wills it.
The main problem with all that was the Companions themselves, for they disagreed about the wish of the Messenger of Allah (saw) to write them a document which would help them to remain on the right path until the Day of Judgment. This disagreement deprived the Islamic nation of a unique virtue, and has thrown it into darkness until it was divided and plagued with internal quarrels and finally ended up as a spent force.
It was they who disagreed on the issue of the Caliphate (the successorship of the Prophet), and were divided between a ruling and an opposing party, thus dividing the nation into the followers of ‘Ali and the followers of Muawiyah. It was they who differed in the interpretations of the Book of Allah and the sayings of His Messenger, which led to the creation of the various creeds, groups and subgroups; and from them came many scholars of scholastic theology and schools of thoughts and philosophies inspired by political ambitions with one aim in mind and that was to obtain power.
Through my discussions with the Shiite scholars, I discovered that, in their views, the Companions were divided into three categories:
The first category included the good Companions who knew Allah and His Messenger truly well, and they acclaimed him (the Messenger) to the last moments of their lives. They were truly his friends by words and deeds, and they never abandoned him, but rather stood their ground with him. Allah - the most High - praised them in many places in His Holy Book, and the Messenger of Allah (saw) also praised them in many places. This group of Companions are mentioned by the Shi’a with reverence and respect, they are also mentioned by the Sunnis with the same reverence and respect.
The second category were the Companions who embraced Islam and followed the Messenger of Allah (saw) either through choice or through fear, and they always showed their gratitude to the Messenger of Allah (saw) for their Islam. However, they hurt the Messenger of Allah (saw) on a few occasions, and did not always follow his orders, in fact they often challenged him and challenged the clear text with their points of view, until Allah, through the Holy Qur'an, had to intervene by rebuking them or threatening them. Allah exposed them in many Qur'anic verses, also the Messenger of Allah (saw) warned them in many of his sayings. The Shi’a mention this group of Companions only because of their deeds, and without respect or reverence.
The third type of Companions were the hypocrites who accompanied the Messenger of Allah (saw) to deceive him. They pretended to be Muslims but inside themselves they were bent on blasphemy and on deceiving Islam and the Muslims as a whole. Allah has revealed a complete Surah in the Qur'an about them, and mentioned them in many other places, and promised them the lowest level in Hell. Also the Messenger of Allah (saw) mentioned them and issued warnings about them, and even informed some of his close friends about their names and characteristics. The Shi’a and the Sunnis agree in cursing this group of Companions and have nothing to do with them.
There was a special group of Companions who distinguished themselves from the others by being relatives of the Prophet (saw), in addition to having possessed ethical and spiritual virtues and personal distinctions from Allah and His Messenger that no one else was honored with. These were Ahl al-Bayt (the Prophet's Family) whom Allah cleansed and purified, and ordered us to pray for them in the same way as he ordered us to pray for His Messenger.
He made it obligatory for us to pay them one fifth of our income, and that every Muslim must love them as a reward for the Muhammadan Message. They are our leaders and we must obey them; and they are people firmly rooted in knowledge who know the interpretation of the Holy Qur'an and they know the decisive verses of it, as well as those verses which are allegorical.
They are the people of al-Dhikr whom the Messenger of Allah equated with the Holy Qur'an in his saying "the two weighty things" (al-Thaqalayn), and ordered us to adhere to them1, He equated them to Noah's Ark: whoever joined it was saved, and whoever left it drowned2. The Companions knew the position of Ahl al-Bayt and revered them and respected them. The Shi’a follow them and put them above any of the Companions, and to support that they have many clear texts as proofs.
The Sunnis respect and revere the Companions but do not accept the above classification and do not believe that some of the Companions were hypocrites; rather, they see the Companions as being the best people after the Messenger of Allah. If they classify the Companions then it would be according to their seniority and their merits and their services to Islam. They put the Rightly Guided Caliphs in the first class, then the first six of the ten who were promised with heaven, according to them. Therefore when they pray for the Prophet (saw) and his household they attach with them all the Companions without exception.
This is what I know from the Sunni scholars, and that is what I heard from the Shi’i scholars regarding the classification of the Companions; and that is what made me start my detailed study with the issue of the Companions. I promised my God - if He led me on the right path - to rid myself from emotional bias and to be neutral and objective and to listen to what the two sides said, then to follow what was best, basing my conclusions on two premises:
1. A sound and a logical premise: that is to say that I would only depend upon what everybody is in agreement with, regarding the commentary on the Book of Allah, and the correct parts of the honorable Sunnah of the Prophet.
2. The mind: for it is the greatest gift that Allah has given to human beings, and through it He honored them and distinguished them from the rest of creation. Thus, when Allah protests about what His worshippers do, He asks them to use their minds in the best possible way, and He says: Do they not understand? Do they not comprehend? Do they not see? etc."
Let my Islam primarily be the belief in Allah, His angels, His Books and His messengers; and that Muhammad is His servant and His Messenger; and that the Religion of Allah is Islam; and that I will never depend on any of the Companions, regardless of his relation to the Messenger or his position, for I am neither Umayyad nor Abbasid nor Fatimid, and I am neither Sunni nor Shi’i, and I have no enmity towards Abu Bakr or Umar or Uthman or ‘Ali or even Wahshi, the killer of our master al-Hamzah, as long as he became a Muslim, and the Messenger of Allah forgave him. Since I had forced myself into this study in order to reach the truth, and since I had rid myself, sincerely, from all my previous beliefs, I decided to start, with the blessing of Allah, by considering the attitudes of the Companions.
For further research - click >>> www.al-islam.org/then-i-was-guided-muhammad-al-tijani-al-samawi
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
@@SH-np9vu Woe upon you ignorant muslim! Al- Sadiq, peace be on him told me that pharaoh was the first to use the word 'rafida' (apostates) for those magicians who apostatized the religion of pharaoh and obeyed Moses' orders.
Then the rafidi (apostate) is he who renounces what Allah hates and does what Allah orders.
Is there such a person in our present time?
I am weeping over myself because I am afraid that Allah may set a seal upon my heart while I had accept this noble name (i.e. rafidi) before.
So, my Lord will admonish me and say: "Ammar you renounced the false and did the obligations as He said to you." Then that will decreases my degree when He forgives me and causes a severe punishment because he discussed with me, except when the Imams guard (me) against that with their intercession.
And as for my weeping over you was because you told a great lie when you called me with a name other than my name and because I felt compassion for you because of the punishment of Allah, the Exalted, when I renounce the holy names and follow the low ones. Then how will you be patient towards the torture of your world?"
So, al- Sadiq, peace be on him, said: "If 'Ammar had sins greater than the skies and the earth, Allah would forgive him his sins for these words, and He would increase his rewards for them."
These words, as you see, indicate his firm beliefs. Also they show that emotions did not turn him away from his thought. He had a book (a group of traditions). A group of the reliable narrators reported the book. Also a group of the Sunni great figures reported traditions on his authority. In al- Fihrast, b. al- Nadim has mentioned him and regarded him among the Shi'te jurists.
Very well put I cannot agree more w your statement.. also Allah swt already appointed a successor right at his birth Imam Ali a.s being born inside the Kaaba was the BIGGEST endorsement a man can have and to this day the crack keeps appearing as a sign of what happened at the Kaaba 🕋 also we cannot forgive those who sided with Muawiya and yazid they attacked Mecca and Medina not even 100 years after the prophet (saw) passed away 😢 how can one not see the difference
Excellent job brother my Allah bless you .
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
Oh new channel? Good luck. 👍
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
my brought up has been from a sunni family but my parents have always preffered love for Ahlul bait more than anything else, my question is that if Abu Bakr and Umar were hypocrites why did Imam Ali A.S did not raise his sword against them. i was told through out my childhood that. Ali's sword will never rise for any injustice.
@@mrhk6470 The reason for that according to Shia Hadith sources is that Imam Ali عليه السلام did not have enough loyal, brave men with him. Many prophets and successors did not rise against the tyrants of their time for the same reason.
Indeed there's no comparison of the virtues of Ahlul Bait A.S , but O Muslims beware beware of the fitnah which our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ warned us about. read this and relate this fitnah of these rafidas relating to the hadees of our Prophet Muhammad ﷺ. Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri narrates that the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ was distributing the booty, Abdullah Ibn Dhil-Khuwaisira Tamimi came and said: "Be just, O, Mohammed!" The Prophet ﷺ said angrily: "Woe to you! Who would be just if I were not?" Syedna Umar bin Khattab R.A said: Allow me to cut off his neck!" He said: "Leave him, for (in future) he has companions, and if you compare your prayers with their prayer and your fasting with theirs, you will look down upon your prayer and fasting in comparison to theirs (i.e. those Kharijites will be worshiping too much). Yet they will pass out of the religion as an arrow passes out of the pray and there is nothing at the front, back and the middle part of the arrow and the arrow has been too fast to be smeared by dung and blood. The sign by which these people will be recognized will be a man whose one severed hand will be like the breast of a woman and these people will appear when there will be differences (which took place between Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A and Muawiya R.A) among the people." Syedna Abu Saeed Khudri R.A narrates: I testify that I myself heard this from the Prophet and (also) testify that it was Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A who killed those Kharijites (in the Battle of Nahrawan) while I was with him The dead body of the man (from among those killed from the Kharijites) with the description given by the Prophet ﷺ was brought to Ali. The following Verse was revealed in connection with that person. "And of them are some who accuse you in the matter of (the distribution of) the alms. [At Tauba: 58] Sahih Al Bukhari 6933.
Syedna Abdullah ibn Abbas R.A narrates that when the Haruriyyah (kharijites) rebelled, they secluded themselves in a place. There were 6000 of them. I said to the Chief of the Believers, Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A to delay the prayer (Zuhr) until it is cooler so that I speak to these people (Kharijites). Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A said: I fear that they can harm you. I said. Never! There is no such possibility. So, I put on a very nice garment and combed my hair and I visited them at midday while they were eating. They said (when they saw me). Welcome O son of Abbas! What has brought you here? I replied: I have come to you from amongst the Muhajir and the Ansar companions and from the son of the uncle of the Prophet ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A). And upon their (conditions) descended the Quran, so they are more knowledgeable about the interpretation of Quran than you and there is no one (of virtues) like them amongst you. (The purpose of my arrival is that) I convey to you what they say, and to convey to them what you say. So (upon hearing it) many of them came and sat down beside me. (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) asked them (the Kharijites): Give me the evidence on the basis of which you have enmity against the companions and the son of the uncle of ALLAH's Messenger ﷺ and his ﷺ son-in-law (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A)? They said: There are three reasons of this difference. I said: What are those three reasons? One of them said: The first one is that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib) had men judge in a matter of ALLAH, while ALLAH says: "The judgment is for none but ALLAH. [Al-Anaam: 57]" What have men got to do with the judgment in this matter? I said: this is one objection (i.e.. tell the next objection?) They told the second reason that he (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) fought (with the group of Syedah Aishah R.A in the Battle of Jamal and with the group of Muawiyah R.A in the Battle of Siffin) but he R.A did not take their captives (as concubine and slave) nor did he R.A take the war booty! If they were disbelievers, then their captives are permissbible and if they were believers then it was wrong to fight them in the first place! I said "These are the two things, now tell the third objection? They said: He (Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A) got the word "Chief of the Believers" removed from his name (in the peace treaty with Muawiyah R.A), so if he is not the Chief of the Believers then he is the Chief of the Disbelievers? I said: Do you have any objection other than these three? They said: No! These three are sufficient. I said. Do you agree if I read to you from the Book of ALLAH and from the Sunnah of the Messenger of ALLAH ﷺ which refutes your objections, will you then accept? They said: Yes, of course! I (Syedna Abdullah bin Abbas R.A) said: As for your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A had men judge in the matter of ALLAH (and in this way he committed disbelief), then I will show you from the Book of ALLAH , where ALLAH has delegated judgment to men regarding the value of a quarter of a dirham (which is an insignificant amount) that they judge in this matter. ALLAH says: "O you who believe! Do not kill game while you are on pilgrimage, and whoever among you shall kill it intentionally, the compensation (of it) is the
like of what he killed, from the cattle, as two just persons among you shall judge. [Al-Ma'idah: 95]"
Now see that ALLAH has delegated this ordinary and small judgment to the servants while he himself could have pass this judgment, even then he made the judgment of men permissible. I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the matter of the rabbit (hunted during the pilgrimage) is more important? They (Kharijites) replied: Why not! It (the reconciliation between the Muslims) is more important. (Then I said providing the second evidence :) ALLAH said about the wife and her husband: "If you fear a breach between the two, then appoint a judge from his (husband) people and a judge from her (wife) people. [An-Nisa: 35]" I adjure you by ALLAH, if the reconciliation of disputes of Muslims and prevention of bloodshed for the sake of peace (by the judgment of men) is important and better or the settlement of the marital affairs of a woman? They said: It's ok! Then I said: As far your objection that Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A fought but he did not make (the opposite group) the war captive and did not take booty (from their wealth). Tell me, do you want to take your mother, the Mother of the Believers Syedah Aishah R.A as a war captive? And do you want to make her permissible for yourselves like other war captive women while she is your mother? If you answer is that you make her permissible like other captive women. Then you have committed disbelief. And if you say that she is not your mother, even then you have commited disbelief as ALLAH says. "The Prophet has a greater claim on the faithful than they have on themselves, and his wives are (AS) their (believer's) mothers. [Al-Ahzab. 6] So you are between the two ill judgments. Get out of them? Did you get the answer of the second objection? They said: Yes! Then I said: As for your objection that (It was because of the objection of Muawiyah R.A since Muawiyah R.A did not accept Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A as his caliph, that's why) Syedna Ali Ibn Abi Talib R.A himself got the word 'Chief of the Believers removed, then I will give you a reply that will please you. See! The prophet of ALLAH ﷺ got his name, Muhammad, the Messenger of Allah,
written in the peace treaty of Hudaybiyyah. The disbelievers objected that our fight is based only on
this point that we do not accept you as the messenger of Allah. So, He said to Syedna Ali Ibn Abi talib R.A (who was writing the peace treaty): O Ali! Remove these (words), O ALLAH, you know
that I am your messenger, O Ali! Write this: "Muhammad bin Abdullah". (The rest of the detail is coming under hadith number: 44) I swear by ALLAH that the messenger of ALLAH is much better than Syedna Ali and even then he himself got the word "the Messenger of ALLAH "erased, and erasing this did not erase his prophet-hood Did you get the answer of the third objection? They said Yes! So, (because of this scholarly debate) 2000 of them immediately repented and came back while the remaining 4000 Kharijites were killed at the hands of Muhajir and Ansar companions in the condition of misguidance Sunan Nasai Al-Kubra 8575, Sheikh Ghulam Mustafa Zaheer said in Khasais e Ali. Its chain is authentic]
@@mohammedal-nidawi8896 i cannot believe that how have we been brainwashed about tge history. we even see in movies that Prophet SAW his uncle Hamza A.S and his progeny Ahlul Bait were the ones sacrificing everthing and Abu Bakr and Umar are found nowhere but they did convert to islam before the conquet of Makkah
lot of confusion after conquest and everything after.
can you tell with authenticity the status of Abu sufiyan and muavia and marwan at the time of abu bakr and umar. i know what was happening at the time of usman.
i feel that there was corruption after the conquest because of all the fogy infirmation completely discarding Ali A.S and bringing forth Abu bakr Umar and Usman. Prophet SAW said that narrated by Ume Salma R.A that " Ali is with tge Quran and Quran is with Ali they will stay together until the day of reckoning until they come to me at Kausar"
Brother answer only if you know
Request you to advise who was the teacher of imams Shafi, Hanafi, Hambali, Maliki and during which years. Jazakallah
Following you from Kashmir, why no activity on Rafida plus
Read the reasearch paper of Mohmmad Ali Mirza on Karbala
The enemy of Islam wants us devide and fight each other, whoever doesn’t understand this agenda of the enemy and promote split and hate between Shia and Sunni is working for the enemy. Period.
You are victim to a double bluff. If you think that peace and prosperity is in our personal hands, you’re mistaken. There is precisely one thing and one thing alone that will save mankind, and that is the upright religion His prophets came with. It would be best you align with the movement that aims to revive this upright religion, Shia Islam.
Doing Takfir on prominent figures of other sects will provoke hatred, can't you see this? Had you pay heed to contemporary scholars you would understand this.
@@Echoes_of_Justiceso what if it provokes hatred? islam is a religion that teaches us the difference between right and wrong. the world may criticise the shia today, but atleast we dont praise the killers of the ahlybat as
@@Echoes_of_Justice”Doing Takfir” is not a decision we make, it’s a theological matter.
Well done!!
one most compelling argument that could possibly be added to a later video,
an argument from logic. Do you believe in a god that would leave the world devoid of his guidance?
God has seen how time and time again the clerics of religion have misguided the people after the demise of the prophet or successor, would such a god be called wise if his modus operandi was to leave the nation in the hands of those very clerics without any guidance from himself and then issue a statement saying I have perfected for you your religion?
Furthermore would such a god be deserving of the titles "just" and "wise"?
Weren't you in rafida plus?
If, after the Prophet, the community had followed his instructions, the atrocities committed during the conquests of other nations wouldn't have occurred. Islam would have spread through hearts instead of by the sword, bloodshed, and crime. These conquests, which are a disgrace to Islam and are celebrated by the Sunnis, would not have taken place. According to which Islamic and Quranic teachings were the massacres and violations by Umar ibn al-Khattab's army in Iran justified?
May Allah bless you brother, I made clips of your Ashura video, hope that's okay.
Of course, feel free to use any content.
respectfully, When I was deciding whether to joining the Islam of the Sunnah or Islam of the Shiatul Ali, one thing that made me make my decision was the fact that according to the Shias, Ali got beaten by two old men and then those old men hurt his wife which lead to her miscarrige and eventual death and somehow a year later Ali went to go work for both men for a number of years as an advisor. If you really think that the man who lifted the Gate of Khaybar was too week to defend himself and his wife against two old men, then I'm sorry but Ali didn't deserve to be Khalifa. But then again, You also cannot find a single hadith in any shia books whether the Prophet PBUH praised Abu Bakr, Umar, Uthman, Khalid, or Amr and so many more even though they were close to the Prophet. this shows a clear bias in the Shia group to disregard any companion who did not agree with their false narrative regardless of how beloved they were to Muhammad PBUH.
You can find a hadith about the Prophet peace and blessings be upon him and his family telling Muawiya in Sunni books that may Allah not fill your stomach lol
This is interesting, because as a Shia I’ve never heard until reading this that the imam got ‘beaten up’ before they killed his wife - I’m pretty sure imam ali wasn’t in the house when his wife died
Imam Ali (as) choke slammed umar
Why do Sunnis attribute patients of the imam (as) to be a vice but to uthman as a virtue
Uthman had his wife groped infront of him and was silent
The will of the Nabi (pbuh) was for the Imam (as) to have patients and this he showed it perfectly
The Nabi (pbuh) was stoned by the pagans of Mecca and he did not retaliate even though Allah (swt) was by his side
You logic is very flawed in this approach and clearly you only followed the Sunni narrative instead of seeking truth
Imam Ali (as) talks about his in a sermon in naghal balagha
He also said with his hand on the throat of umar that is it was not for the will of the Prophet (pbuh) he would have killed every person that attacked the house and that if they return he would do just that
Thus the hypocrites did not return to the holy house
As for why he was an advisor (did not work for them) to the Muslims it is the position of an Imam to do just that to help the Muslim ummah from dying even though it was going astray he did his duties
I advise you to look into Shia theology and make your choice not just into the flawed Sunni theology and why they falsely claim about Shia faith
@@hussienalaouie3147 Sir with all due respect. The last thing that truly made me to decide which denomination of Islam to accept was when I was researching Imam Jaafar AS and read his own words in Shia books regarding Shia Hadith Narrators. Imam Jaafar AS himself called the Shia narrators as Liars, Fabricators, and asked Allah to curse them for attributing lies in his name. And that was from Shia books, not Sunni books. How do you expect me to believe in an Ideology whose own highest and most revered scholar cursed the Shia Hadith Narrators like Zurarah ibn Ayan, Jabir bin Yazid Al-Joufy, Muhammad ibn Muslim, Abu Basir al-Muradi, Al-Mufaddal ibn ‘Umar (he was called a Kafir by Imam Jaafar) etc. I can go on and on and provide you evidence for every single claim that I made. When your own Imam half cursed these people who have narrated 99% of your Hadiths, then how do you expect me to follow your theology??????
@@SuperAltamish23 are you also going to provide the context of those Hadiths where anyone who was to praise the imam (as) was slaughtered and killed by the cursed ummayid regime you people hold so high
Are you also going to show the Hadiths that praise those individuals and show that the answer the Imam (as) gave was dependent on the person who asked for the purpose of saving the lives of his companions
Sunnis love the half truths and neglecting what has happened in history to push their fantasy narrative
Again if you you’re going to use something as an excuse for your delusional theology use a better one
Here is a real reason to be Shia
Mubaghala, Hadith thuqulain, ghadeer khom, khaybar, Hadith of the first revaluation
Those are all proofs of the wilayah of Imam Ali (as) can you do one hadith at the time of the Nabi (pbuh) that can even suggest Abu bakar as worthy of that position
And remember things that happen during the time of the Nabi (pbuh) are usoul al deen so you cannot be Muslim without them
Very good video❤
Mashallah ahsant
Very nice 👍, praise worthy 👏, politely described😊
Its ironical that people claim prophet left nation without a successor indirectly putting blame on prrophet for the chios this is disrespectful, how come a man of noble presence who bulit a state so perfectly and ended up in throwing it into chaois
......these.people are no less than than those who opposed prophet during his times infact people are following those who hijacked islam
@@imranalikariiimi2509 not surprised they respect a man that called him "delirious".
Salaam,
Great presentation. Thank you.
As the holy Quran said people follow the path of their fathers [tradition] when invited to the right path (Quran 31:21). Muslims generally do the same thing.
They totally ignore the commandments to use intellect (اکثرهم لا بعقلون). That’s the problem!
Ahsantom
اللهـــمــ عجـــل لو ليــــڪ الفـــرجـــ🏴
ʾAḥsan-tum! 🖤
As a muslim our true guidance will be the life of the prophet and the word of Allah ( the quran). The shia/sunni divide is polital not religious. Allah saw, says in the quran - this day i have completed your religion, so islam was complete. We as muslims are supposed to see beyond the political divide ands recognize that we have more in common than differences. A couple of points for further analysis why didnt the sunnis and shias merge when hazrat Ali became the caliph, also why would hazrat Ali allow one hie daughter to marry hazrat Umar? We shouldnt refrain from criticizing the companion's of the prophet, they were part of the prophets circle because they were meant to be there, if one of them was a traitor or power hungry individual, dont you think that the prophet would have known. Finally, the prophet left no successor because it was test of those left behind to choose unity rather than divide, they failed at that task. On a side note, regarding the paper and pen incident, theres no telling what prophet wanted written down, you cant make assumptions that it was the name of a successor
If Iblis was going to a traitor don't you think Allah (swt) would have known? If Nabi Nuh's wife and son would have disobeyed him, don't you think he would've known? If Nabi Yaqub son, Nabi Yusuf, was going to be thrown in a well by his brother, you don't think he would've known?... I can keep going. Your argument is weak.
Are you seriously unaware of the event of Ghadir Khumm? Maybe research the tafsir of Quran 26:214. The Hadith of the warning. Rasulullah pbuh&hf blatantly named his successor on multiple occasions.
What was that Shout at 8:53 with later new frame ?
Ya Ali
Imama Jaafar AS cursed Shia Hadith Narrators and called them liars and fabricators in Shia books.
Jabir bin Yazid Al-Joufy
he met Imam Baqir (rah) only once and never met Imam Jafar (rah)
"I asked Abu Abdullah (as) about the hadiths of Jabir Al-Jafy, he replied: I saw him only once with my father and he never met me". [Rijal Kashi p:191]
Zurarah ibn Ayan
al-Kashshi records that Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq cursed Zurarah. The following quotation is but one of several places where his cursing of Zurarah is on record:
"By Allah, he has ascribed lies to me! By Allah, he has ascribed lies to me! By Allah, he has ascribed lies to me! May Allah curse Zurarah! May Allah curse Zurarah! May Allah curse Zurarah!" (Ikhtiyar Ma‘`rifat ar-Rijal, vol. 1 p. 361)
Muhammad ibn Muslim
He claims to have heard 30 000 ahadith from Imam Muhammad al-Baqir, and a further 16 000 from his son Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq (See Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat ar-Rijal vol. 1 p. 391) is also recorded by al-Kashshi to have been cursed by Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq (vol. 1 p. 394).
Abu Basir al-Muradi
"Abu ‘Abdillah (Imam Ja‘far as-Sadiq) used to get annoyed and upset with his presence, and his companions are in disagreement amongst themselves about him.
(Ikhtiyar Ma‘`rifat ar-Rijal, vol. 1 p. 397. See also al-Ardabili, Jami‘ ar-Ruwat vol. 3 p. 43)
Al-Mufaddal ibn ‘Umar
Imam Ja‘far is recorded by al-Kashshi to have addressed by calling him, “You Kafir! You Mushrik!” (See Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat ar-Rijal vol. 2 p. 612)
Another lengthier narration of al-Kashshi runs as follows:
‘Abdullah ibn Miskan says: Hujr ibn Za’idah and ‘Amir ibn Judha‘ah al-Azdi came to Abu ‘Abdillah [imam Ja‘far] and told him: “May we be ransomed for you! Mufaddal says that you [the Imams] determine the sustenance of the people.” He [imam Ja‘far said]: “By Allah, no one besides Allah determines our sustenance. One day I needed food for my family. I was under difficult circumstances and thought hard about it, until I managed to secure food for them. Only then did I feel content. May Allah curse him and disown him.” They asked: “Do you curse and disown him?” He replied: “Yes, so you too, curse him and disown him. May Allah and His messenger disown him.” (Ikhtiyar Ma‘rifat ar-Rijal vol. 2 p. 614)
NOW IF YOU CLAIM THAT IMAM JAAFAR AS WAS DOING TAQIYAH. THEN YOU ALSO HAVE TO ADMIT THAT IMAM AHMED IBN HAMBAL HAD MORE COURAGE AND RESILIENCE THAN IMAM JAAFAR AS DUE TO IMAM AHMED ACCEPTING PRISON AND TORTURE EVERY DAY FOR 2.5 YEARS RATHER THAN RENOUNCING HIS AQEEDAH OR SAYING LIES TO GET RELEASED.
Most of the Muslims division is caused by the Hadiths. We totally abandoned the Quran and followed man made teaching. These Hadiths weren't teaching Prophet Muhammad, but the day we will stand in front of Allah, we will know reality
The shia has it Wright hundred per cent because of this fallacy they claim SAW as being a human being as anyone which is a monstrus lye but you still have to tell us the complexion of the True successor Ameer Al Momineen Seydina Ali AS You portrayed Umar and Aboubacar as black in the movie Lady of Heavens what about Ameer Al Momineen AS please answer thanks
So true. I hate that. They're all from Quraysh but the evil ones have to be portrayed has black and the Prophet (pbuh&hf) and his family are fair skinned. I refuse to watch strictly based on that BS.
I would like to hear you explain the concept of the hidden imam. thx in advance
Fantastic
The Shi'a narrative is never considered.
Prophet Mohammad left Quran for us for guidance, just stick to it.
Quran and Ahlul Bait (a.s)
Allah and his Prophet PBUH didn't know that there would be a divide in Ummah on the successor of the Prophet PBUH still they didn't choose a successor .....n still Allah said in Quran that he has completed this religion what kind of completion is this that the Ummah divided on a very next day 😂😂
I don't believe that the sahaba were evil hypocrites. I just think they were ignorant. To ignore such a haderth at gadeer khum. Immam Ali (as) was definitely chosen by the Prophet to be successor.
This is against what the Imams (peace be upon them) said and is not what we find in the books of classical Shia scholars such as Sheikh al-Saduq and Sheikh al-Mufid. This is the belief of the Batri sect.
The prophet SAW. Did not mention who will be the first muslim caliph but he did by example when he was very sick on his last days he the prophet let Abuse Bakr to lead the muslims in prayer.
If we take you for your word then why did Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) say in Hasan Hadith that Khilafa will be for 30 years then there will be kingship. By that account the 30 year Khilafa will be at Haq. If Ali (AS) was the only true successor why didn't Prophet (PBUH) say true Khilafa will be only the time span when Ali (AS) was Khalifa? And this Hadith is Hasan btw. Sahih and Hasan Hadith are authentic. The Prophet (PBUH) never lied sir.
Would you be so kind to share who exactly shared that Hadith? Also ain't the people from same people who tried to hide the original Hadith from the from Prophet (Peace be upon them) that I an leaving Quran and Aly ul bait as for the ummah to follow to remain on the true guided path? Or did you not read tge Hadith of Ghadir where all 100,000+ accepted bait for Hazrat Ali as when Prophet(Peace be upon Him) guess what you never did because you are too busy in reading the falsely created Ahadiths created by so called Caliphs and their followers
It's really funny the small things you put in the video to indicate where you stand like always saying "so-called sunni" and putting ❌️s on sunni claims and ✔️ on shia claims 😂
Really great video may Allah reward you inshallah
8:28 according to your logic the nabi صلى الله عليه وسلم wasn’t infallible. He trusted hypocrites. his best mates and wife were crooked?
@@g7dsent666 The prophet didn’t trust any of these people. If he did, why would he ask them to taste the “medicine” that was administered to him ? Why would he prder them to all leave Medina on his death bed? Think about it.
Plus, prophets have always been surrounded by traitors who claimed to be believers. Jesus himself was betrayed by one of his so called disciples: Judas.
Our Judas or Judas’s are Omar, Abu Bakr, Aisha and Hafsa.
Need I say more?
go read your sahih books. it is all there
It is a test to see who really is faithful and who is a hypocrite, and umar w abu bakr LA failed the test and so is everyone who follows them.
just like Lut's wife and Moses's wife they were not good people. so your comment is invalid.
Try again lol
@@ertugrulsulaimanshah4236So our Prophet appointed by God was not able to put forth a leader that was ordained by god ? 2-3 hypocrites were able to stop Allah SWT ?
This is essentially what you are saying.
Sure Judas might have betrayed Isa AH but was not successful according to us. If you’re christian……. sure he was successful in having God crucified.
One thing is to have hypocrites and liars around you and one thing to have them at the forefront and to marry one. Are you saying our Prophet would live with a woman that is a hypocrite?
@@yasandslay3912looks like you’ve mistaken The Seerah for Game of thrones again 🤪
Shia muslim don't believe Ahlulbaith are like Prophet Muhammad..!! Prophethood end with Muhammad saww and Ahlulbaith are thier khalifa or Wali ..!! just like Ale Ibrahim are khalifa or Imam of Ibrahim as.
Who represents Ahle bait now?
Hazrat Muhammad Mustafa (S.A.W)
Hazrat Imam Ali (a.s)
Hazrat Fatima zehra (S.a)
Hazrat Imam Hassan (a.s)
Hazrat Imam Hussain (a.s)
Allahuma salli ‘ala Muhammadin wa ‘ala Muhammad..☝🏿 Masha’ALLAH i luv listening & learning from Yu Aki…🖐🏿🕋🤲🏿🧎🏿♂️
❤❤❤
Shia said Prophet Mohammed is infallible then on the next slide implying the prophet chose all the wrong companions so which is it?
@@KnowerofThings The prophet was sent to all people and logically, more so to the sinners and disbelievers than those who already believed in Allah. Hence the inevitable gathering of traitors. Those who claimed to believe but then reneged on their vows did so at their own peril. That does not put into question the Prophets infallibility but puts into question the ulterior motives of the characters who claimed to be muslim but later betrayed the Prophet.
I don’t think the prophet ‘chose’ who his companions were - rather those companions stood beside the prophet themselves and learnt from his conduct
If Iblis was going to be a traitor don't you think Allah (swt) would have known? If Nabi Nuh's wife and son would have disobeyed him, don't you think he would've known? If Nabi Yaqub son, Nabi Yusuf, was going to be thrown in a well by his brother, you don't think he would've known?... I can keep going. Your argument is weak.
@@COPSCheckingOurPublicServants Yes Allah knew ofcourse what these characters were going to do, Iblis or anybody else for that matter, because we as muslims believe He is all knowing. Not sure what is your point.
If you’re referring to the notion that Allah should have stopped it, on the contrary. Allah tells us in the quran that prophets will have enemies from amongst their wives and children, and so will regular people. That is by design, not coincidence.
Altagahbun 64/14
Alanam 6/112
@@ertugrulsulaimanshah4236 yes that’s my point. Pointing out that his argument of Why the Prophet (sawa) would have these people around him if they going to betray him didn’t make sense.
His job was complete to deliver the quran and give his teachings. Any successor would just be a plain human made into a king/pope like person . There is no reason to have one.
So you know better than Allah (swt)? Are you really unaware of the event of Ghadir Khumm? Or read the tafsirs of Quran 26:214, Hadith of the warning. Allah (swt) made Rasulullah (pbuh&hf) declare his successor JUST AS EVERY PROPHET BEFORE HIM DID.
👏👏
How do you explain the bloodline of Imam Muhammad Baqir's (ع) going to AbuBakr?
Look at the bloodline of Ali al-Akbar, look at the bloodline of Abu Bakr, daughter waging war against her brother
lol outlining history at this point without hard evidence is just pointless. Just distancing from the truth of sticks who follows the book and the prophet as much as clear which it is thanks to Allah
I have to ask you mention alpt about the corruption of sunni islam
Let's say this is true and this cycle you have laid out is accurate
Csn you then substantiate the claims found within shia islam and it's imams
For refenrce I do not know what they would be I'm just wondering how do you know that what you follow is accurate someone else being wrong doesent male you right (not saying you've said this I'm just making a general point )
Yes, it is easily substantiated.
Any Umari here with brain?
Why increase the sectarian discourse finally ali ra was also made caliph and what has happened and happened things happened cant be changed we dont have time machine stop this division in a name a unchangeable past .
then why believe in anything at all, things happened for a reason. all these events happened to show the truth for those who seek the truth
@@faizanahmed8067 One should always seek the truth. That’s why in school we have a subject called history to understand what happened in the past and learn from it. Can we say that we don’t want to hear about the bad Nazis because it causes discord with the German people?
What are the sources? You just state a bunch of things without providing any evidence.
There's plenty of evidence in just the Sunni books that paints this exact truthful picture. Once you understand the hatred many people had towards the prophet's family you will begin to question many so-called sahi hadiths. There's plenty of information available online. If you really want to know the sources you can DM me.
I started watching this video so curious and excited to finally understand the topic.... Instead its a hateful onesided very biased and dishonest look of history.
truth is bitter habibi
Think about the Muslim world today if the leadership stayed in the family..
Make me embarrassed tbh
According to all Shia sects, when Allah was revealing verses 33:6, 9:100, 48:29, and 59:8-9, Allah did not know in advance that Aisha (r.a.) would battle against Ali (r.a.) or that many companions would become disbelievers or hypocrites. That is why, they argue, Allah did not exclude them from these verses. Therefore, they have no doubts that these companions should be considered hypocrites. Astagfirullah
Meaningful words 😂
Ali supported Abubakr to be the CALIPH and there is no recorded fact that he rejected.
The fact your all praising this man shows me shia really hate the sahaba...while imam ali never acted like you people even if he disagreed with them on things
“he disagreed with them on things”
That’s a good step forward
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 I don't need dogma to understand the life of imam ali a.s
you are wong actually. In Saheeh bukhari and muslim he called them "traitors, thieves, sinners and Liers"
also he didn't give his bay'a until Six months later from the death of the profit ! (according to you books)
@ferassalah9695 yes that's history i said I don't need dogma to understand ali history is enough
@ferassalah9695 the same way imam ali a.s acted in history is how shia should act I don't need a cleric to tell me to curse people when I see and have Imam ali as an example to follow
Abbasids the stone idolator is the originator of the religion of islam, a veil to keep and promote the stone idolising.
In the start it's the stone in the end it's the stone.
Ahsant
X
Get well soon mate
The main reason the “Sunni” term was coined is because in the early years of Islam after the prophets death, the people of Sunnah were those that relied on Ahadeeth transmitted by reliable asaneed to contextualise and understand the deen. This differentiated people from Ahlul Bidaa’ or those that rejected or down right falsified their chains of transmission.
Shiaa Islam relies on pigeon hole'd readings, shock value and outright lack of reliable chains of transmission in their books of narrations. That is why the sects within Shiaa Islam differ wildly in the amount of Imaams, the divinity and their general ‘aqeedah of the conception of these Imaams and Allah. I mean if it is such a core component of salvation, and yet you can't decide how many Imaams there are and what powers they posess?
The suggestion that that the understanding of Islam is only contextualised by blood, is illogical as humans rely on reports and transmission. For companions in general to be around the prophet, and observe his sayings, decisions, overt and tacit approvals and then not transmit is absurd. It is a proven fact ahlul bayt were not always around when things happened around the prophet, and unless the shiaa are willing to ascribe divinity or supernatural powers to them, as they do their Imaams, it is clear Sunni islam can be repeatedly tested with their academic corpus to prove their positions come from sound, replicate-able evidences backed by sound chains of transmission.
The fact that tertiary transmissions of the Prophets actions, words, approvals is so crucial is because it contextualises and gives credence to Islam, of which the Quran will not give. This is evidenced, by the Shiaa attempt to create their own corpus of narrations, of which in the early years you'll find Sunnis creating an unbiased science of verification and transmission to really sift out reliable and unreliable reports, and the shiaa focussed on books of history which press their claims which have no reliable and traceable chains of narration. Finally when they did come with their books of reports it was full of defects in the wordings and their chains never held of to proper scrutiny from the scholars of Jarh wa ta'deel, something which vastly remains unexplored in the Shiaa tradition.
So yes, it is a political disagreement amongst the Sahabah that turned into a fitna, and the people of misguidance used that to wedge further divides.
I didn’t read all of that, but I got the general idea. Do you think your points are good enough for someone like Dr. Yasir Qadhi for example to use in a lecture, or that would end their whole career?
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646
YQ has struggled and grappled with modernity ever since he left Saudi. His career ended the day he decided to veer into topics that weren't his specialty 🤷🏾
Although, i'm sure you'll find him a welcome guest if you ever wanted to discuss Al-Radhi's non existent chains of narration in Nahj Al-Balagha.
7 generations between Ali ibn Abi Talib رضي الله عنه and Al-Radhi, but he seems to have time travelled and become the primary source somehow.
@@tonymontana24596 I see.. So your arguments are staying here and will never find their way into a lecture by any respectable academic
@@mohammedal-nedawi6646 They wouldnt need to because I'm paraphrasing Al-Dhahabi and Ibn Abdil Barr from within the academic tradition. Incidentally, the same people YQ would need to resort to 😂
Dw I won't make the claim that YQ would time travel to primary sources.
@@tonymontana24596 Great, paraphrasing al-Dhahabi who evaluates hadiths based on his “heart” and uses his oath as an argument. Again, you can paraphrase him here as much as you want, it won’t do much damage to your religion. A quick look at these two PhD theses from your Saudi and Qatar universities is enough to show the reality of the cesspool your “academic tradition” is; PhD degrees being given for indoctrination sermons,
١- أثر التشيع على الروايات التاريخية في القرن الأول الهجري - عبد العزيز محمد نور ولي
٢- تحقيق مواقف الصحابة في الفتنة من روايات الإمام الطبري والمحدثين - محمد أمحزون
Good luck shifting the focus to Nahj al-Balaghah
This sectarian has disrespected the entire circumstances in a prejudiced way. Stop embarrassing your ancestors.
Pube Head😊